Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHENNAI
THE HINDU
17
Jail Document-2
In the Court of the special magistrate,
Lahore
Crown VS. Sukhdev & Others
Charged under section 121N 302+120 B.
This humble petition of the accused
Bhagat Singh most humbly shweth
(states)
1. That the petitioner is going unrepresented in the case.
2. That evidence has been produced in
this court entangling the petitioner in the
murders of Mr. Saunders and Sardar Chanan Singh,
3. That the petitioner may be able to
effectively cross-examine the witnesses,
that (as in Bhagat Singhs own handwriting) it is necessary that the petitioner may
be given an opportunity to visit the spot
and see the roads and other surroundings
in connection with the alleged incident.
4. That the petitioner therefore prays
that proper facilities to be afforded him
for the said Purpose and that the production of further witnesses regarding the
particular incident may be postponed till
the petitioner has been able to examine
the locality.
D/4th Nov.29
Sd./ Bhagat Singh
Petitioner
(Letters written by Bhagat Singh in his
own hand, have been tried to be kept as
close to the original as possible.)
Jail Document-3
To
The Registrar,
The Special Tribunal
Lahore Conspiracy case
Lahore
Sir,
Kindly supply me with an attested copy
of the order of the special magistrate, dated 3rd May 1930, according to which the
inquiry proceedings in that court were
stayed.
Thanking you in anticipation
Yours etc.
D/19th June 1930
Sd./Bhagat Singh
Undertrial
Lahore conspiracy case
Lahore
To,
The Registrar,
Special Tribunal, Poonch House,
Lahore
Through
The Superintendent,
Central jail, Lahore
Noting No.7 by D/20th June 1930
Forwarded to the Registrar, Special
Tribunal Poonch House Lahore, for fa-
D/26/8/30
Sd./ Bhagat Singh
Petitioner
Central Jail, Lahore
Seen by all the members of Tribunal.
Placed on record.
Sd. / d. 27/8/30
Jail Document-10
In the court of the Special Tribunal
Lahore Conspiracy case, Lahore
Crown VS. Sukhdev & others
Charged under sections 121, 121A, 302,
120B etc.
Most Respectfully Shweth:1. That yesterday on 29th August30 the
petitioner was informed by the jail authorities that orders have been received
from the local govt. to allow him interviews with the legal advisers, relatives and
co-accused for discussing and deciding finally about our defence in this case on
29th, 30th and 31st August 30.
2. That father of the petitioner who is at
Ludhiana standing his own trial, has been
sent for and is expected today.
3. That the petitioner shall have an interview with his co-accused tomorrow viz
31st August30.
4. That in the present circumstances,
the petitioner shall be able to decide about
his defence and will inform the court
about the same on Monday i.e. 1st September 1930.
5. That it is therefore prayed that the
learned court be pleased to postpone the
passing of any final orders on the question
of defence till Monday when the petitioner shall be in a position to inform the
court of his final decision regarding the
same.
D/30th Aug: 30
Sd./Bhagat Singh
Petitioner
No. 182-c D/ 30.8.30
Forwarded to the Registrar to the court
of Special Tribunal Lahore Conspiracy
case Lahore for favour of disposal.
Lahore Central Jail Sd./30.8.30 Supdt./
Central Jail
Jail Document-11
In the Court of the Special Magistrate,
Lahore
Crown Versus Sukhdev Etc.
It is submitted as follows:That on 21st [October, 1929] instant, an
unhappy incident occurred in the court.
While an approver named Jai Gopal was
giving his evidence standing in the dock,
he adopted such a provocative posture
that apart from twisting his moustaches,
he addressed the accused, Janab ye Sab ap
ke kartut Hai Sachchi Sachi Baten keh
raha hun [Sirs, these are all your misdeeds, telling the true incidents!]. In these
most provocative circumstances the
youngest of all the accused, Prem Dutt
[who was just 18 years at that time, born in
1911], got excited and threw a slipper at
the approver. All the accused disapproved
of his act and disassociated themselves
from it. They wanted to make a statement
in connection with that affair. But their
statement was not recorded. They then
submitted a joint statement. In spite of
their statement to that effect, orders were
passed against all the accused and all were
subjected to undergo humiliation for the
fault of one person, which was against the
principle of Justice.
Comrade Bijoy Kumar Sinha has already submitted a statement about what
happened in the Borstal Jail on 22nd instant. On the 23rd Bhagat Singh and B.K.
Dutt were brought to the gate of the court
by the Jail authorities. But the notice
wanted to handcuff them on both hands
which they refused. Then a large number
of policemen and a few sub-inspectors
and inspector pounced upon them. A few
sat on their bodies and others xxxxx (word
cancelled after writing) continued violently kicking and beating. These blows