Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THD3-2
M. N. Abdul Kadir
Malaya University
Department of Electrical Engineering
50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Email: makadr@yahoo.com
Saad Mekhilef
Malaya University
Department of Electrical Engineering
50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Email: saad@um.edu.my
I.
INTRODUCTION
978-1-4244-1872-5/08/$25.00 20081EEE
A.
1196
VAN]
[VBN =
VCN
[10 01 0]0 [X
Xb
(3)
Xc
(6)
-1
1
(4)
-1
2
-1
(5)
Vc
2 -130]
i [-1
-1-..J3
(7)
a,b,c
= round (
V
s
(8)
A.
(a)
13Vs
_ _ 12Vs
11Vs
__
Vs
-Vs
where Vd,q and id,q are the motor voltage and current
components, related to the actual quantities by the inverse
transformation of equation (7), Rs, Ld and Lq are the stator
circuit resistance and direct and quadrature inductances, OJ is
the electrical synchronous speed and flJj is the rotor flux.And
the motor torque expression is given by
-12Vs
1- 13Vs
(b)
Fig. 1. (a) 3-cell, 27-level asymmetrical cascaded H-bridge inverter (b) the
voltage levels corresponding to one inverter arm.
1197
IV.
(13)
V.
Therefore the next reference stator voltage vector is
defined as:
V;Ck)*
= r;Ck -
l)R s
+ L1qJs
T
(14)
3C x c lookup table
XC9
A.
XC3 XC1
-13 -1
-1
-1
-12
-1
-1
-11
-1
-1
Torque ripple
To cel1-1 gees
Vpklef
Cell 2
Va
111
-1
12
131
Celie
1198
Tm *
to
cell3
Voltage
__________________________________________________________
and
current
measur
2-cell ML inwrter
3-cell ML inwrter
3.66
3.66
3.66
3.64
3.64
3.64
3.62
3.62
3.62
3.6
3.6
3.58
3.58
3.56
3.56
0.105
0.11
0.115
0.12
3.58
3.56
time
3.6
time
time
Fig. 5. The torque ripple comparison of the DTC-PMSM drive with, from left, SVM controlled inverter, 2-cell per arm and 3-cell per arm asymmetrical
multilevel inverters with switching interval of lOO/-lsec.
SVM inwrter
2-cell ML inwrter
3-cell inwrter
3.66,----,-----,--------,--------,
3.66,----,----------.----,------,
3.66,----,-----.,-----,..-----,
3.64
3.64
3.64
3.62
3.56
3.6
3.6
3.58
3.58
3.56
3.56
time
time
Fig. 6. The torque ripple comparison of the DTC-PMSM drive with, from left, SVM controlled inverter, 2-cell per arm and 3-cell per arm asymmetrical
multilevel inverters with switching interval of 50/-lsec.
1199
TABLE I
PARAMETERS OF THE IPMSM USED IN THE COMPUTER
SIMULATION
B.
1000
138.56
0.533
4
6
1500
5.8
44.8
102.7
0.001
. Switching losses
CONCLUSION
The DTC control strategy is similar to the one used for the
SVM DTC-PMSM drive. This strategy produces a
continuous reference voltage vector. The inverter controller
approximates this reference vector to the nearest vector that
can be produced by one inverter switching state, and the
inverter holds this state during the following switching
interval.
The proposed drive system has been modeled and, for the
purpose of performance evaluation, it has been compared
with the SVM drive of the same switching interval. The
results obtained demonstrate that the 2-cell drive has a torque
ripple level comparable to that of the SVM drive, and the 3cell drive has a torque ripple level much lower than the SVM
However, the results
drive at switching interval of 1
show that the SVM torque ripple reduces by decreasing the
switching time interval while the torque ripple of the
multilevel inverter, with the proposed controller, has a
minimum ripple level after which increasing the controller
frequency does not reduce it. By comparing the number of
switching pulses per arm it has been shown that the
multilevel drive has much lower switching losses compared
to the SVM drive.
Besides the advantages of the torque ripple and the
switching losses reduction, the proposed drive inherits the
features of the asymmetrical multilevel inverter drive, such
as low voltage stress and the highest power stage operates at
the lowest switching frequency.
The drive has two main drawbacks; first the higher
number of switching devices and second the requirement for
a number of dc power supplies equal to the number of Hbridge cells applied. However it sensible to suggest the
system for battery powered drives or for high power or high
voltage drives
Other aspects may be further investigated, issues like:
modifying the inverter topology to accommodate SVM
technique to reduce the ripple and developing a dedicated
DTC concepts for this type of inverters.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
1200
2-oe" ML inverter
3-oe" ML inverter
6000
2000
5000
1200
1500
4000
'l
'l
1000
'tJ
'tJ
1000
200
o l':....-._-----L_ _- L - _ - - - - - - I ._ _---'
o
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.2
time
0.2
time
time
0.4
Fig. 7. The number of switching pulses of the three switching signals ofDTC-PMSM drive with, from left, SVM controlled inverter, 2-cell per arm
and 3-cell per arm asymmetrical multilevel inverters with switching interval of 100J-lsec.
SVM Iverter
2-oe" ML inverter
14000
3-oe" ML inverter
3000
4000
3600
"
3000
j.#'
,;"
2000
'tJ
It"
'tJ
'tJ
,,',1
6000
2600
"
/
I
1000
2000
i
1600
l'
/'
4000
/.l
600
,l"
<....
0
0.1
0.2
time
"
..... ,. ......
.......
_......
0.2
time
0.3
0.4
Fig. 8. The number of switching pulses of the three switching signals of the DTC-PMSM drive with, from left, SVM controlled inverter, 2-cell per
arm and 3-cell per arm asymmetrical multilevel inverters with switching interval of 50J-lsec.
[7] M. F. Rahman, L. Zhong, andM. E. Haque, "A Direct TorqueControlled Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive
Without a Speed Sensor", IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,
Vol. 18, No 1, March 2003, pp 17-22
[8] L. Tang, L. Zhong, M.F. Rahman, and Y. Hu, '" A novel direct torque
controlled interior permanent magnet synchronous machine drive with
low ripple in flux and torque and fixed switching frequency", IEEE
Trans. Power electron., vol. 19, no. 2, pp 346-354, March 2004.
[9] L. Tang, L. Zhong, M.F. Rahman, and Y.
"A novel direct torque
control for interior permanent magnet synchronous machine drive with
low ripple in torque and flux-A speed-sensorless approach", IEEE
Trans. On Industry Applications, Vol. 39, No.6, pp. 1748-1756,
November 2003
[10] K.E.B. Quindere, F. Ruppert and M.E. de Oliveira, "Direct torque
control of permanent magnet synchronous motor drive with a threelevel inverter", Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2006. PESC
'06. 37th IEEE, pp: 1 - 6,18-22 June 2006
1201