Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No.
1934
VOL. 13
www.americanradiohistory.com
ELECTRICAL COMMUNICATION
A Journal of Progress in the
Telephone, Telegraph and Ra dio Art
H. T. KoHLHAAS, Editor
EDITORIAL BOARD
E. A. Brofos
P. K. Condict
G. Deakin
E. M. Deloraine
P. E. Erikson
John W. Foard
F. Gill
James E. Fullam
Frank C. Page
H. M. Pease
G. E. Pingree
2,
S. G. Ordway, Secretary
ENGLAND
Joseph A. Redegeld, Treasurer
Volume XIII
JULY, 1934
Number 1
CONTENTS
IMPROVED TELEPRINTER KEYBOARD TECHNIQUE.. .
By F. R. Thomas
... . . . . .
PAGE
. ... ...
9
14
30
31
51
61
f.
76
92
94
www.americanradiohistory.com
www.americanradiohistory.com
Typewriter Characteristics
Teleprinter Characteristics
The five-unit telegraph code used by Tele
printer Systems provides a maximum of thirty
two signal permutations. After allocating com
binations to the various functions such as carriage
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C AL
C O MMU N I C A T I O N
Figure 1
Principle of Operation
www.americanradiohistory.com
Figure 2
E L E C TR I C A L
C O M M U N I C ATIO N
Figure JA
,,
'
,
:-----
Figure 3B
Storage
Figure JC
0peration
www.americanradiohistory.com
ANSWER BACK
UNIT
TRANSMITTER UNIT
TRANSFER
UNIT
Figure 4
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C TRI C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Figure 6
3 4
'
II 13 15
5
II
IO 12 M 16
1711119
20>
,,
22
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L EC TR I C A L
C O M M U N I C A TI O N
"Run-Out" Key
Another feature introduced in the new key
board is the provision of a "run-out" key.By
holding down this key the combination already
set up in the transfer mechanism by the last
character key depressed is transmitted continu
ously. This facility is not only useful for circuit
testing purposes, but simplifies the work of the
operator when tabulating or underlining. For
example, when typing a continuous line under
the heading of a letter, it is now only necessary
to operate the "hyphen" key (-) once, and then
hold down the "run-out" key.
"Answer-Back" Unit
In Fig. 1 a key is shown marked "Who are
you." The depression of this key transmits a
combination to the distant printer which causes
the release of an "answer-back" mechanism ,
Fig. 4. This consists of a frictionally-driven cyl
inder carrying a number of wards in which are
cut predetermined five-unit combinations. The
cylinder is normally held at rest by a detent
which is disengaged on receipt of the signal trans
mitted by the "Who are you" key. As the cyl
inder rotates the five-unit wards operate suc
cessively upon five selecting levers which are
connected to the second storage bars, 39, Fig. S.
As each combination is set up on these bars, a
separate cam on the "answer-back" cylinder
trips the transmitting shaft, and the combination
is transmitted back to the printer at the other
end of the line. All keys on the keyboard are
locked against operation during the rotation of
the cylinder to prevent interference with the out
going "answer-back" signals. The cylinder is
brought to rest by the detent at the end of one
revolution, and the keybar lock is removed.
This feature was primarily designed for use
in person-to-person communication to enable the
calling subscriber to verify that the correct con
nection had been established, but it is also of
use in point-to-point services when there is no
attendant at the receiving instrument, as it en
ables the sending operator to verify that the
distant machine is working.
www.americanradiohistory.com
In connection with the development af the continuous loaded telephone cable, it has
been found desirable to measure accurately the inductance and ejfective resistance of
very short samples, as well as the magnetic properties of the loading material. Details
are given of a bridge suitable for this purpose.
HE
Introduction
www.americanradiohistory.com
10
E L EC TRIC A L C O M M U NIC A TI O N
OSCILLATOR
INPUT. CONTROL.
"-
JI
Me.A.SURING
INDUCTANCES
METER
Figure 1
resistance and inductance of the sample. Similar main problem was to obtain a total variation of
measurements are made both with a-c. and d-c . , about 10 ohms in increments of 0 .000 1 ohm
and from these the increment o f effective a-c. without appreciable error due to contacts. This
resistance over the d-c. resistance may be com was successfully achieved by adopting the form
puted.
of a five-dial shunted coil variable decade2 re
Any errors due to stray capacities, etc. , are thus sistance, the five decades having ten steps each
seen to be confined to the one arm,CD, of the of 1.0, 0. 1 , 0.01 , 0.00 1 , and 0.0001 ohm, respec
bridge in which the sample is inserted; the re tively. In this arrangement each of five single
maining three arms, being fixed, merely serve to coils is successively shunted by ten coils so as
complete the bridge network, and all errors in to provide a complete decade, with the result
the latter cancel out on account of the double that very small increments of resistance can be
balance.
obtained without any great difficulty in adjusting
The inductance L 1 consists of three separate individual resistance coils and without the in
variable inductances in series, having maximum troduction of errors due to contact resistance of
values of 350, 20, and 0 . 1 microhenries, respec the switches.
tively. Each is constructed astatically, and is
The connections to the shunted coil decades
sufficiently isolated to reduce mutual effects to are so arranged that increasing dial readings de
a negligible value. The chief trouble in connection crease the resistance in the circuit.In the same
with the design of these inductances lay in their way the measuring inductance L i is arranged so
tendency to change their effective resistance with that increasing dial readings actually correspond
different settings but, by using litzendraht wire, to decreasing inductance in the circuit.By this
carefully spacing and supporting the coils by the means the resistance and inductance of the
minimum of solid dielectric material , and sup sample is read on the dials directly if L i andRa
porting them in holders without having resort indicate zero when the sample is short circuited.
to any metal in the form of screws, spindles, and
In order to effect this zero adjustment a small
bushes, such trouble was almost entirely over variable resistance and inductance is provided
come. The smallest inductance is provided mainly in the adjacent AD arm of the bridge. Four
to obtain the high degree of bridge balance shunted coil decades of total variation of about
necessary to observe small changes in resistance.
2 Mueller : Bulletin of Bur. of Stds. No. 13, p. 547, 1916,
In the design of the variable resistanceRa the and No. 1 1 , p. 571, 1915.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L EC TR IC A L C O M M U N IC A T I O N
------- - 71-1'
AC.1NPIJT 0.C.INPUT
0 0 0 0 =
,.I'
Construction
--------__....,
GAL.VO. OUPUT
0 0 0 00
.,
...... COUPLE ,j
m@lil
SAMPLE TERMINALS
KE'{.
OUTPUT SELECTOR
KEYS
KEYS
A..O.INDUCTAMC::E
[] Qo- [!] E
INPUT SELECTOR
<oO R5l
CD oSC.\NP\JT SHUM
11
iPUTTH.ERMO
COUPl-E. METE.R.
:ZERO ""1:).JUSTMENT
Fir;ure 2
www.americanradiohistory.com
12
ELE C TR I C A L
C O M M U NI C A TI O N
Figure 3
Accuracy
'
I
I
.--.--
lo=.:c
i.:Qza
I
I I
I I
0
Ill
L.czr.
:J
Ill
l=
w
l.:c1s. !!!
Ill
w
70K
lcl<!L a:
...
lm:z.. 0
"-"1.a. uJ
A
.--I
zo
v
/.
,/
a:
u
40
'fa-
_I/
I?-
11-
1..---
I/
GOK<
_,,
SOK
40
,_ -
,__
lOK1
,/
I/
r7
'
I I I
I/ !/ I/
I
I/
'
IJ
I/ / I
v
/ /
/ /
17
/
I/
vl7
,v
www.americanradiohistory.com
I/
I/
L-- i....---
60
80
100 IZO 140 160 1eo zoo 22.0 240 260
INDUCTANCE L1 MICROHENRI
Figure 4
77
I/
zso
E L E C TR I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
13
www.americanradiohistory.com
and J. H. HOLMES
International Standard Electric Corporation
EDITOR'S
Oscillator
f),,furbed
Cd
Jeledor
11eter -Lme
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C TR I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Oetec.tor
tfeter - Line
't---------------/m
fb!
15
x
'(__
___
--8
www.americanradiohistory.com
16
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I ON
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T ION
-...
k;G.
Cit.
,.
1.
_,
102
..... -4.5,
... - 2
1l
- '
-.o
,..
.m Km
-i--
i...L-.-
i.--i-:- -
c'9,r;
/If.<
, .
I(
Co""'Vf
hi'. f"!!.J--
HI
'--i-..-
!l.J
1-1- "'
JJ,f.
--
...
.e..
,.";,'=j.
- ,_
n.1
.._.
., 1-1-1-
0.'1tm {f
11!.i'I I!...-i--
-<10 -::;:
1:..
i---.!'6 n.
r
T-"8 -9.
"-'" A<.
_,_-
51.1!.rt".
.. "='".....
lr1
';\K.
.. ey i.-
Ir
'9K.":
!1
- .
'-- ..
f.i'
: I
1-
.. I
; :1
'"
- I
!
I
$.0
,0
'
s..e
..,
--
"'
-1-
-.
f"t9
,___,__
'"-
,_
"1-t.;
I'!
/.
17
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
18
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
'""
-r-- ____
?rliea
Tr. .;..
o.s _
_____
r----i--
! ':-!.,..
n.1.....
..-_. '"''""'
.!t2.
1
2
.3
4
s
6
7
8
9
10
r...stern
But:aresf-Or.;;dea
Cernrivli
/.;,si
"
C(qj
Brarov /YS.I'
2
"
P/oesli ,, 1
,/ ,, 2
""
., .!
caik
1Y
CS3
CIY.3
CS3
OAf
Of
j)f
QI
J)f
01
DI
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
eiL.101..-
Vo s.iegeolJCt:
}_
fi
--
.,
'
\II
I
I
I
""'
--/Set:
\
\
24IJIM
19
]
k
a,
'
'
'I
1
I
j 'II
' I
JJ
..,;,ftec.
10000
..
J\
I '
\ I
\I
'
zeoO(I
.MOt1t1
\\
I
'a0
1,
l '\ I
,
/!
\1
', 4
,..
76
77 79,tlJ
78 79 80
77 7 7S
7o
"
5000
8J
80
8J
87
"
'SV.
.,
m ,
'
(2) ),
..
I -'
114\
Ji -
m ' G ,.u11n
. M 1
JI vr 1
/,.,
,\ , \\ I /- J
I '
I \
;I
iI
f
2 ,-_,,,,
I
\
Q/1
"
I." /j \
'
10
I ; IP\ IV id
A fe
1-"" I
i.q; I
78 7J
76 7JI
-7: 72
I
7J 72
.... ,,.
l'f'.
'" Ov
""' 00
VI. Results
(a) Interpretation of Measured Values
The measured values consist of direct read"mgs
www.americanradiohistory.com
20
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
70
i/
i.
\
\\ \
'
(3)
' t2'I
ona
,,
,I
I
\'
" ' / :.Irl
'=:y
"'
,,
(.;)
,, l r.s' v
'
#iVIO 11 a sy.s in 1
f21.,rnrt "'r-oln.'
I
,,
Q\
'
'
Vci {I.If!!. , ;
,,
71
.,
\
'
ii
\;-.I
B A '
73
72
7J
\
\'
'\
ii
/!\
. .
.
51 '00
67
72
70
67
'
/,
\ ii
\ i
.
"'-...
-
-.
I
i
,,,,
--
-o
'
\
I
'
80
60
lfi'
l\ J I
\ \V/
I
'
- ''\ [\
ii
71
70
63
7J
63
oo
'
,.....
"'
6c
62
76
70
er>
F.l
-
\. ,
67
\ '<
'
14-t
66
'
\
'. '
64
' H
"' "
10000
Figure 17-Far-End Corrected Line Crosstalk between Bucarest-Brasnov D.1 Systems. (15th July, 1932.)
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
Cu. v"'
'JD
LM f
" ' t:ll
l'.i\
Ill
(1J
" @ .se.
" I i<>
"
'" 17V
' SJ
.1
1,
rv"' 'I'm ,;,,
"
'
_I .,,- '
-!:
'10
"*
.'.!
::
I
II'
1\
"'
\ /.r7
vv
.500o
,/
' If- /
,,,,
-?'
!
I/
, ..
......
,,
'
j.Q)
l'3l
\ .I
!
f
;;.
i--,
,_
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
/' .
,v/
""'/sec.
," .,
1;
\ L..--- :"1)
I' "-v
_._
i\!I
10000
21
2nd Q.P.
3rd Q.P.
78
79
80
125
1 12
100
19
78
15
Decibels
Crosstalk Units
Weighted
Total
Mean in D.B.
www.americanradiohistory.com
112
79
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
22
A
Q
3 '%,
6 -
,,
'-;
.I
5,;1am
Pk .t/
_:n
!
ii'.
,,
'' "'
.s V.5 'el
"
-1.1
r_,
79
1.1
7 1 .9 db.
Decibels
Crosstalk Units
Weighted
1st Q.P.
2nd Q.P.
3rd Q.P.
77
77
75
140
175
98
26
140
21
-------- -----
-----
Total
145
Mean in D.B.
7 6 .5
TABLE IV
Measured and Calculated V. F. Crosstalk between Szeged
C.N.3 and Timioara C.N.3 and between Oreadea C.S.3
and Iai C.S.3 Systems in the A -B Direction
Disturbing
1
Or
Or 2
3
Or
Ia;;i 1
Ia;;i 2
la9i 3
Sz 1
Sz 2
Sz 3
T 1
T 2
T 3
Disturbed
Ia;;i 1
Ia;;i 2
Ia;;i 3
Or 1
Or 2
Or 3
T 1
T 2
T 3
Sz 1
Sz 2
Sz 3
Calculated
36.8
47 . 3
68.8
74.9
80.3
92.9
53.5
60.9
63.7
55.7
62. 7
58.7
Measured
46.0
44.0
58.0
80.0
67.5
80.0
54.5
. . . .
....
50.5
58.0
60.5
Szeged
Key : Sz
Timi9oara
T
Or
Oradea
Figure denotes number of channel
=
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
23
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
TABLE V
Measured and Calculated V. F. Crosstalk between Single-Channel Systems Cluj, PloeJti and BraiOV in the A-B Direction
Disturbing System
Disturbed
System
Cl. D.A.1
Br. I
73.1
Pl. I
63.6
Pl. I I
Key : Cl
Br
Pl
65.0
56.0
40.0
=
55.5
53.0
65.0
47.5
2 .8
63.0
50.0
50.0
56.0
Pl I
Disturbing System
Pl I I I
Pl I I
64.5
67.5
Pl I
65.0
68.0
58.5
72.0
Pl I I
65.0
70.0
Pl I I I
66.0
56.0
58.0
65.0
Disturbing
System
Br I
Br I I
58.1
58.0
62.4
Br I I
5 1 .0
63.5
Br I
1 300
= 052
2500
(2500 p :s. is the normal width of band) .
10 log10
48.0
Cluj
Bra9ov
Ploe9ti
DB
46.5
63.0
61.5
5 1 .0
60.0
63.0
63.5
70.5
55.0
53.5
58.0
50.0
53.0
48.0
60.0
47.1
Pl. I I I
53.5
54.5
64.0
60.0
54.0
51.0
53.0
61.0
62.0
5 1 .0
52.0
5 1 .5
58.3
Br. I I
58.0
65.0
46.5
53.0
61.0
54.8
80.3
60.0
62.0
58.3
Br. I
80
71.0
PI. I I I
PI. I I
69.3
59.5
54.0
Cl. D.A.1
Pl. I
Br. I I
63.0
Key: Br
Bra9ov
Pl = Ploe9ti
Roman numerals denote number of system.
Calculated value is in upper left-hand of each square,
measured value in lower right-hand.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
24
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
TABLE VII
Band Reduction Corrections. A-B Direction
C.N.3 I
C.S.3 I
C.S.3 II
4.5
5.0
C. N.3 II
4.5
C.S.3 I I I
C.N.3 I
C.N.3 I I
C.N.3 I I I
0.8
4.5
C .N.3 I I I
D.1
3.5
C.S;3 I
4.5
C.S.3 I I
5.0
C.S.3 I I I
4.5
D.1
2.8
2.8
4. 5
3.5
7.0
C.N.3 I I I
D.1
0.8
7.0
TABLE VIII
Level Reduction Corrections. A -B and B-A Directions
C.S.3 I
C.N.3 I
C.N.3 II
C.S.3 I I
C.S.3 I I I
C.N.3 I
0
1
C.N.3 III
0.5
C.S.3 I
C.S.3 I I
C.S.3 I I I
D.l
C . N.3 I I
1
0
www.americanradiohistory.com
3
0.5
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
25
TABLE IX
Measured and Calculated V. F. Crosstalk between Unlike
Systems. A-B Direction
(a) Between Szeged C.N.3 and Timiioara C.S.3 Sys fems
Disturbing
S.Z.1
S.Z.1
S.Z.2
S.Z.2
S.Z.3
T.1 .
T.2
T.2
T.3
T.3
Disturbed
T.1
T.2
T.2
T.3
T.3
S.Z.1
S.Z.1
S.Z.2
S.Z.2
S.Z.3
Calculated
55.7
55
62
70.2
61.6
58.5
47
5 1 .3
53.2
5 1 .5
Measured
66
..
..
.
59
60
.
60
..
56
.
(b) Between Oradea C.S.3, Iaii C.S.3 and BraiOV and Ploeti
D.1 Systems
Calculated
38.6
35.6
37.6
41.6
70.5
63.5
84.4
72.4
Measured
50.5
38
43
41
....
II
Ill
II
Ill
2
2
3
3
53.2
46.2
65.3
47.3
82.0
73.5
99.4
85.4
54
54
48
56.5
la9i 2
la9i 2
Ia9i 3
Ia;;i 3
Br I
Br I I
Br I
Br I I
Br II
Br I I I
Br I
Br II
Ia;;i 2
la9i 2
la9i 3
la9i 3
75.9
78.9
69.5
79.0
67.2
65.7
79.5
74
la9i 2
la9i 2
la9i 3
la9i 3
Pl II
Pl III
Pl II
Pl I l l
Pl II
Pl III
Pl II
Pl I l l
la9i 2
la9i 2
la9i 3
la9i 3
80.9
75.4
79.5
70.0
67.7
56.7
79.0
62.5
Disturbing
Or 2
Or 2
Or 3
Or 3
Br I
Br II
Br I
Br I I
Or
Or
Or
Or
Pl
Pl
Pl
Pl
2
2
3
3
II
III
II
Ill
Disturbed
Br I
Br II
Br I
Br II
Or 2
Or 2
Or 3
Or 3
Pl
Pl
Pl
Pl
Or
Or
Or
Or
. . .
.
Key: Sz
Szeged
T
Timi;;oara
Or
Oradea
Br
Bra9ov
Pl
Ploe9ti
Roman numerals denote number of system
Arabic numerals denote number of channel
=
=
=
www.americanradiohistory.com
..
....
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
. . . .
.
.
. .
. . . .
. . . .
.
.
.
. . .
..
. .
. . . .
..
.
.
. . . .
.
.. .
26
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
7.5 db.
v co.3) 2 x 2 + (0.4) 2 x 2
0.1 db.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Value
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . .
Line variations
.
..
3.75 db.
"
Plate voltage variations in Szeged . . . . 0.3
"
"
"
" Timi;;oara 0.3
"
Filaent current "
" Szeged .
0.4
"
" Timi;;oara 0.4
. . .
Variation
Value
. . .
+ c2 ) 2
5 . 1 5 db.
27
www.americanradiohistory.com
28
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
VIII.
Conclusion
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
'/()
+.
.i
/)/If.WCi VO/\ A
r1 11'T
:L.
'V
I
v!'-'
6 I \,.J
"
.......,_
:i;
.,,
- -
....
,..,__:_
...,,
,__
. ___
..-
- -
'-
l'l>"
lAl1
l
1.-.<>
rv \..,;
Ir<
'-..'\,.
--
-)
" ..>I
....,.,,
...
...
'<i
r..t
....
1 .._..,.,...
......
DIA 'ECIT/C 8- A .
--
8
,.
....
I;
r-..
' ""
I#
29
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
. .
1,,..., . .
. ...,
<><Ii '\,..,.i,..,
rt..
' ""
.....
Jib-<>
hL---l'o..d
- r.-h I""
-,.__
:--...
I,_,.
1,...,..,
'
r._V\
..
..
8
I;
...... ,,_._.
: c (.1..7
---
\,.., _.{fl,......-
i.-.
""""'rv
.,......
.L
........_ ..;/
Rf!CE. vm
'
I I
2
.!
I
s
.,.
I 1."
,,
J>
A
1r1
..dr---..
II
.fi!
,._,
1-.i
,,,.
lS
..r v
Ii'
1 ...__
)6
.f9
i!O
'
22
2!!
,z;,.
i!5
...,, '
. ......
. .
.2!1'
r
v
! , ., .!fo
:..,.
\,
'
www.americanradiohistory.com
I I I I I I I I I I
..
ti
c
120 c
-_.._
100
.l!
u
...
.l!
c
'
'
>--
_______
....
50 0
L
10
0
1933
Jan., 1932
/
70
20
1932
....
80
30
193 1 - 2
I(""
85
87 Number of Toll Centers
Num ber of Possible Channe Is____ 3570 3741
'
I
'
'
I
Maximum Allowable
Loss /
/ '
\
Aceol'ding
to Toll Fund.
June.
; - plan
/
J
j
.s
./ ' N
I
"
"\.
\
=ZO?. 1 1 '
.s
I/ I J I/
\ '
I/
;
...
v
I\' \\
r\.. ' '
j II J
...
"
_i,.-- , "
I I/J '/'/'.!'
1'.
"
J...-"""
"
l.....L\.i\. 'It\. I" -r-...
,, v V/
,......,,
" t\..
i" _v
""""""
.......
"'1
I'.
v
1'...
.
A
i.....
1'..
r--..
.
'"" -- r--.""""
L...-i"1J!t
"'
II0
90
,,.
/Jan. 1934
_j (June, 1933
.,.. ----Jan.. 1933
--
.0
E
-Jan., 1931
.....
"
Loss in Decibels
30
www.americanradiohistory.com
Introduction
OME indication of the extent to which
lead or lead alloy cable sheaths play their
part in the protection of communication
and power transmission systems throughout the
www.americanradiohistory.com
32
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
33
TABLE I
ALLOYS USED OR PROPOSED FOR CABLE SHEATHING
Composition Percent
Remarks
Alloy
Pb
Pure Lead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0
3 3 Tin Alloy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
97.0
2 3 Tin Alloy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
98.0
1 3 Tin Alloy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
99.0
99.0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sb
Sn
Cd
Bi
Cu
Zn
Ca
Zn
Te
3.0
2 .0
1 .0
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1.0
0.06
97.0
Tin-Antimony Alloy . . . . . . . . . .
98.9
Cadmium Alloy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
98.8
0.5
-
0.25
1 .5 0.25
0.4 0.15
3.0
1.0
0.1
1.0
0.5
1 .2
0.04
0.15
0.14
www.americanradiohistory.com
34
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
. .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
. . .
. .
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
35
1 . Ductility.
3. Fatigue Strength.
5. Corrosion ResiEtance.
1. Cost.
3. Hardness.
4. Fatigue Strength.
1. Fatigue Strength.
3. Cost.
4. Corrosion Resistance.
1 . Hardness.
3. Cost.
4. Corrosion Resistance.
1. Cost.
3. Corrosion Resistance.
www.americanradiohistory.com
4. Hardness.
2. Corrosion Resistance.
2. Hardness.
2. Fatigue Strength.
2. Hardness.
4. Fatigue Strength.
36
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
37
www.americanradiohistory.com
38
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
doubtedly due to electrolytic action by stray obviously carried out under very special condi
currents and cannot be attributed to any tions, while examination of the evidence in the
property of the sheath material, there still remain latter series of tests shows that the results are
a very large number which are caused by chemi hardly so conclusive as claimed. Further, the
cal corrosion. For a general account and a fairly theoretical arguments put forward to explain
comprehensive bibliography of the corrosion of the superior corrosion resistance of the lead-tin
lead and its alloys, reference may be directed to alloys are not in accord with modern views. It
the papers by Brady (5, 6) of the Building is suggested that considerable further evidence
is needed before any marked superiority for tin
Research Station.
alloys can be accepted.
lead
The corrosion of cable sheath by acetic acid
general conclusion from the results of ex
The
vapour liberated under special circumstances
work and from experience is that
perimental
from creosoted wood ducts has been investigated
by Burns and Freed (8) and Burns and Camp success in combating corrosion is most likely to
bell (7). Corrosion by phenol from impregnating be achieved by developing suitable waterproofing
compounds has received attention from Fano coatings which can be applied over the sheath.
(16) , Garre (19) and Haehnel (25 ) . Corrosion of If moisture and air can be kept away from the
flattened cable sheath samples in soil and soil sheath, corrosion cannot take place. At the pres
waters has been investigated by Anderegg and ent time, bituminous compounds are widely used
Achatz (1) , Burns and Salley (9) , and others. for this purpose, reinforced often with bitu
Little of the work on soil corrosion, however, is minised paper, cotton or hessian tapes, or im
convincing. The most valuable is undoubtedly to pregnated jute. Methods of treating the sheath
be found in the results of the soil corrosion chemically to produce an inert film on the sur
studies which are still in progress by the United face, and of rolling small particles of another
States Bureau of Standards (2 7, 28) . Unfortu metal into the surface to afford protection, have
nately, the samples of lead and lead-antimony been suggested from time to time (26, 44, 45, 48) ,
sheath used in this investigation were not equal but none seem to have been sufficiently successful
in size and were flattened before burial in the to receive practical recognition. The problem of
soil. Nevertheless, the results emphasise one producing a really waterproof coating which can
important fact-that in soils as distinct from be relied upon to maintain a continuous protec
acids, the rates of corrosion of both materials tion, appears to have been most nearly solved by
are sm.all, and any differences are minute. It the use of bituminised paper, but its introduction
follows that corrosion tests in soils and soil is relatively recent and further experience is
waters must be carried out under stringently needed for its value to be fully established, es
controlled conditions, otherwise the experimental pecially in connection with steel armoured cables.
error may mask the differences which it is sought
to determine. It is not always recognised that Preparation of Sheath Samples for Present
the relative rates of corrosion of lead or its alloys Investigation
under strongly corrosive conditions are not
The present investigation has been carried out
necessarily the same as in less corrosive con principally on samples of empty cable sheath.,
ditions such as prevail when the materials are 1 inch in outside diameter and having a wall
buried in the ground.
thickness of Ys inch, extruded at 20-40 ft./min.
Arising out of this, the very general opinion from a vertical press fitted with a split die block.
that tin-lead alloys are more corrosion-resistant At least one full charge was extruded from the
than lead antimony or unalloyed lead may be press before the samples were taken , and normal
noted. This has probably received support from extrusion practice was followed, the sheath being
the tests recorded by Beckinsale and Water passed through a water trough to prevent ad
house (4) for the endurance of samples under jacent turns from flattening and sticking when
load immersed in normal acetic acid, and also reeled on the drum, which had a diameter of
from the conclusions of Anderegg and Achatz of 4 feet. In a few cases, additional lengths of sheath
Purdue University ( 1 ) . The former tests were were reeled directly on a drum and allowed to
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
TABLE II
MATERIALS USED FOR SHEATH SAMPLES
Sheath Material
Unalloyed Lead* . . . . . . . . .
0.66% Antimony-Lead . . . .
0 . 66
0.8% Antimony-Lead . . . . .
0 . 80
1.0% Antimony-Lead . . . . .
0 . 98
0 . 48
Sn
Cd
Cu
-- -- --
'
0 . 41
0 . 24
0 . 14
0 . 06
-
Age Hardening
Reference has been made above to the property
i
39
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
40
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
.6.
. .
d
"z
< o
> :t
A._
A
"-A
&--
50
A G E
zoo
lN
O A Y S
Somp!eS Cooled
So.,.,ples Cooled
z 11
0 "
rz
' "
A Y S
o z
.
..
"
. ,
--"""-21-....
4 '----'---'---.1..----'
I
IN
0 A Y 5
A
0
.::21.
0
z .
Ow
..
>.
10
. .
" w
U "
- <
Q z
w z
' 0
> J
IN
DAYS
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Fatigue Strength
The first question which required attention re
garding fatigue strength was how far it was safe
to apply the results of fatigue tests on machined
specimens to the case of extruded sheath. A con
siderable measure of agreement existed between
the published results for the fatigue strength of
unalloyed lead specimens of this type determined
on various types of testing machine, and it was
therefore decided as a first step to endeavour to
carry out similar tests on actual lengths of ex
truded cable sheath.
For this purpose, a rotating-beam type of ma
chine using two-point loading was developed.
This is illustrated in Fig. 5, and is a modified
form of one described by Shelton (36) of the
United States Bureau of Standards, for testing
wires. The essential feature is the use of a speci
men so long that its own weight adds stresses at
the centre (over and above those of the uniform
bending moment produced by the applied load) ,
greater than the local clamping stresses at each
end. In this way, it is possible to ensure that
fracture will occur at the centre, without the
need for using machined test pieces having the
usual reduced section. It then follows from the
beam formula that the maximum fibre stress at
the centre of the specimen,
aW2
W1
- +
2
8
d4
'lt D4
D
32
-
41
D and d
www.americanradiohistory.com
42
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
A
"
" 0
p,..,.,_,.t 1..vesbsat''"' -
e...t.-vd sr-,"tn
Present lnvest.9ot1on - Sheath Si::rotched
e
Wat ;!; .-(4-}Cloth
e
&eckrmso!C' and
Townsend and GreenoII (34)
Schvmochr" <!Ind Bouton (Zb)
..
"
'
.
0
..
"
43
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
44
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Tensile Properties
Tensile tests have been carried out at rates
varying from 0.1 to 0.6 inches per inch per minute on samples of sheath. The samples were
gripped in cable stocking grips, small steel plugs
being inserted first into each end, and a free
length of 5 inches was allowed between grips.
TABLE III
FATIGUE ENDURANCE TESTS O N SHEATH
Material
Days Aged
.
Unalloyed Lead . . . . . . .
SAMPLES
Vickers Diamond
Hardness Number Reversed Stress
.
..
..
..
..
4.5
....
....
....
. . .
480 lbs./in.2
456
407
363
407
1 . 10 x 106
1 . 73
0.83 Antimony-Lead . .
70
76
1 79
9.2
8.8
11.4
1088
1088
1047
3 . 66
2 . 30
6 . 63
1 .03 Antimony-Lead . .
( + 0.063 Cu.)
100
106
135
142
264
12 . 6
12 . 1
12 . 6
12 . 6
13 . 3
1341
1 2 50
1209
1 1 69
1 169
. . .
135
1 75
303
182
9.8
9.3
9.8
9.2
1256
1214
1 1 72
1 13 2
1 . 11
1 ; 33
2 . 69
3 . 92
7 . 58
unbroken
2 . 26
2 . 22
2 . 44
3 . 96
.
.
.
.
Remarks
Endurance
5 . 82
4 . 03
1 . 89
TABLE I V
AVERAGE TENSILE TESTS ON EXTRUDED SHEATH
Material
Unalloyed Lead . . . . . . .
0.683 Antimony . . . . . .
0.83 Antimony . . . . . . .
1.0% Antimony . . . . . . .
Ternary Alloy No. 1 . . .
Ternary Alloy No. 3 . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Age in Days
Vickers
Diamond
Hardness
Number
...
157
131
111
122
322
4.5
10.0
10. 3
12 . 6
9.5
5.3
Tensile Strength
0.1 in)in.
mm.
2 1 05 lbs./in. 2
3820 "
4430 "
5005 "
3940 "
2460 "
0.6 in)in./
mm.
0.1 in./in./
min.
0.6 in ./in./
_
mm.
2250 Jbs./in.2
4200 "
4815 "
5210 "
4210 "
2590 "
1 19 3
393
323
353
463
683
62%
30%
273
283
42 3
543
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
i7oo SEMl-
'"'
.RANOE OF .QE\l!:ASeO
.,
A
7PD
..
Present 1nvesbgot1on Exbuded Sheath E>
100- 1so Do!;!" old w.th VD Hordne.s.s o+. 12 - 1 3
Beckn'50le and \l.bl:er-h<:iuse {4)
TCW'1i;e"d and Greenoll (.34)
Deon and 12ord ( 12)
S.:hvmocher and Bouton (a;}
M I
L L I O N S
..
.,
..
..
..
R. E V E i:t S A L S
l50CI
""'
..
Cl'eep
Creep tests have been carried out on samples
of unalloyed lead sheath both under steady lon
gitudinal loading and under steady internal
bursting pressure. In each case, the time required
for failure to occur was recorded.
Longitudinal loading was effected by dead
weights attached through stocking grips to
samples of sheath previously closed at each end
by steel taper plugs. A typical fracture (after
401 days) is illustrated in Fig. 13, and the results
M I L L I O N S
45
.
R. E. V E R. S A L.. S
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
46
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Loadmg
Under Inter-no! Bur""Sbn9 p,.....s.., ur-e
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
per
per
per
per
in. 2
in. 2
in. 2
in. 2
Time to Failure
1036
68
43
.9
hours
hours
hours
hours
Corrosion
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
L---"'-"'----,
--
Conclusion
The experimental work which has been de
scribed demonstrates that considerable age
hardening effects occur in cable sheaths extruded
from antimony-lead and antimony-cadmium
lead alloys. The antimony-lead alloys age-harden
nearly as rapidly when cooled slowly in air as
47
www.americanradiohistory.com
48
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
TABLE VI
Vickers Diamond
Hardness No.
Weight Before
Tests
Weight After
One Week
Loss of Weight
361 . 00 gms.
357 . 09 "
369 . 09 "
359 . 15 gms .
355 . 20 "
367 . 20 "
1 . 85 gms.
1 . 89 "
1 . 89 "
Material
Age Days
Unalloyed Lead . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
...
...
410
420
10 . 2
10. 2
326. 90
319. 24
"
325 . 37
3 1 7_ 72
450
12. 4
306 . 96 "
305 . 25
280
312
9.5
9. 5
0.8% Antimony-Lead . . . . . . . .
1.0% Antimony-Lead with
0.06% Copper . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ternary Alloy No. 1 . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
...
...
.. .
"
"
339 . 8 1
338 . 12
"
"
"
1 . 53
1 . 52
"
1 . 71
336 . 94 "
335 . 40 "
2 . 87
2 . 72
"
"
"
"
"
TABLE VII
RESULTS OF TESTS ON THE PROPERTIES OF CABLE SHEATHS EXTRUDED FROM VARIOUS ALLOYS *
Vickers Diamond
Hardness No. After Days
Sheath Material
Unalloyed Lead . . . . . .
0.66%
0.8%
Antimony-Lead
4.5
6.0
50
100
4.5
7.5
4.5
4.5
8.5
10.0
10.0
4.5
...
375
lbs./sq. in.
4.5
10.0
119 %
62 %
10.0
10.3
39 %
3 2%
30 %
No special application.
1 1.0
27%
1 1.5
13.0
12.0
12.5
1 165
12.6
35 %
28%
10.0
10.0
9.5
9.0
9.5
9.5
46 %
42%
5.3
5.3
5.3
53
5.3
63 %
54%
Special Applications
10.0
6.5
9.5
1 . . 7.5
3 . . 5.3
Antimony-Lead
(Copper Bearing) . . .
4.5
V.D.
V.D.
Safe Semi-range
Straining
Applications for Which
Straining
Hardness
of Stress for
Hardness
at 0.6
at 0.1
the Material is Recom
No.
1 0 X 10 Cycles
No.
in./in./min. in./in./min.
mended
1 1 .0
8.5
1.03
400
-- -- -- --
6.5
Antimony-Lead.
200
Percent Elongation in
Aged Condition in
Tensile Tests
Fatigue Strength in
Aged Condition
..
lbs./sq. in.
1070 lbs./sq.
in.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
References
1 . Anderegg, F. 0. and Achatz, R. V. : "Self Corrosion in
Lead Cable Sheath,'' Bulletin Eng. Expt. Station,
Lafayette, Indiana, 1924, No. 18.
2 . Archbutt, L.: "Failure of the Lead Sheathing of Elec
tric Cables," Trans. Faraday Soc. 1921, 17, 22-35.
3. Beaver, C . J . : "The Physical Behaviour of Lead
Sheaths in Relation to Failures of High-Voltage
Cables," Elect. Rev. 1929, 104, 96-98, 142-145, 187188, 734-736.
4. Beckinsale, S. and Waterhouse, H . : "The Deteriora
tion of Lead Cable Sheathing by Cracking and Its
Prevention,'' J. Inst. Metals, 1928, 39, 375-406.
5. Brady, F. L . : "The Corrosion of Lead in Buildings,''
Building Research Tech. Paper, 1929, No. 8.
6. Brady, F. L . : "The Corrosion Resistance of the B .N .F.
Ternary Alloys of Lead in Buildings," Metal Ind.,
1932 ' 40, 297-298.
7. Burns, R. M . and Campbell, W. E. : "Electrical Re
sistance Method of Measuring Corrosion," Amer.
Electrochemical Soc. (Advance Copy) 1929, May,
137-151.
8. Burns, R. M. and Freed, B . A. : "Corrosion of Cable
Sheath in Creosoted Wood Conduit," J. Amer. Inst.
Elect. Eng. 1928, 47, 576-579.
9. Burns, R. M . and Salley, D. J . : "Particle Size as a
Factor in the Corrosion of Lead by Soils," Ind. and
Eng. Chem. 1930, 22, 293-297.
10. Clark, C. L. and Upthegrove, C . : "Flow Characteris
tics of Some Lead Cable Sheath at Temperatures
Above Atmospheric," Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. Trans.
1930, 52, 1F.S.P. 249-254.
1 1 . Dean, R. S., Hudson, W. E. and Fogler, M. F . : "The
System Lead-Antimony I I , " J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1925,
17, 1246-1247.
12. Dean, R. S. and Ryjord, J. E.: "Alloys for Cable
Sheathing," Metals and Alloys, 1930, 1, 410-419.
13. Dean, R. S., Zickrick, Lyall and Nix, F. C . : "The
Lead Antimony System and Hardening of Lead
Alloys,'' Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Met. Eng., 1926,
Feb.
14. Dubose: "Tempering of Alloys of Lead and Anti
mony," Reunions des Membres Francais et Beiges,
_
Assoc. Internationale pour l 'essai des matenaux
de
construction, 1905, March 25.
15. Dunsheath, P. and Tunstall, H . A. : "The Physical
Properties of Cable Sheaths," J. Inst. Elect. Eng. 1928,
66 280-289, 638-64 1 .
1 6 . F no, E . Da: "Chemical Corrosion o f Lead i n Pre
sence of Phenol (1)," Giorn. Chim. Ind. Appl., 1932,
14, 18-2 1 .
1 7 . Fano, E. Da : "Catalytic Action o f Phenols i n the Cor
rosion of Lead-Covered Cables, " Telegr. U. Fern
sprechtech. 1932, 21, 267-270.
49
www.americanradiohistory.com
50
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
20 log1 0
zL + z N
ZL - ZN
decibels.
www.americanradiohistory.com
52
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C 0 M M U N I CA T I 0 N
53
"
point below any given value at any prescribed ' one loading point to another and also between
frequency. The more practical problem, however, the inductances of individual coils at each load
is to predict the probable minimum and average ing point. Circuits may be connected at random
values, for all the circuits in a group, of the mini between one loading section and the next so that,
mum singing point of each circuit over a pre for example, a circuit of high capacity in one
scribed frequency range. The present paper gives loading section may be joined through to one of
a solution to this latter problem based on theo low capacity in the next. Variation of mean
retical considerations and involving certain inductance from one loading point to another
empirical assumptions which have been justified can generally be neglected in comparison with
by subsequent results.
variations of inductance from coil to coil at the
It is proposed to explain the application of same loading point. If not, the effect can easily
this solution to practical problems and to be allowed for in the calculations.
In the installation of toll cables, steps may be
recapitulate sufficient information from the
above-mentioned paper by G. Crisson (Electrical taken to reduce the capacity deviations in each
Communication, Vol . IV, p. 98) to enable any loading section by cross-splicing the circuits
one unacquainted therewith to apply this solu according to the results of deviation tests and
tion so as to predict approximately the probable also to reduce variations of capacity along a cir
minimum and average values of the minimum cuit by matching circuits of high capacity in one
singing point over a prescribed frequency range section to circuits of high capacity in the next
for a group of circuits in all cases normally section. The method of calculation herein de
arising in practice. These quantities will be scribed is applicable to cases where such practices
designated "minimum minimum singing point" have been followed and also where no such pre
and "average minimum singing point," respec cautions have been taken.
tively.
It will be recalled that, for any individual cir Data Required
cuit, a current transmitted from one end will
Assuming that it is required to calculate the
give rise to a reflection from each individual probable minimum minimum or average min
irregularity along the circuit. The magnitude of imum singing points, or the fraction of circuits
the total reflected current returned to the send having minimum singing points less than a given
ing end at any particular frequency depends .on value, for a group of similar normal circuits
the magnitude and phase relation of each indi over a range of frequencies from a lower limit
vidual reflection. It would be mathematically f' to an upper limit f, and for given line irregu
possible to predict the exact value of singing larities, the following data are required :
point at any frequency for every circuit in a
(a) The root mean square value of the frac
cable provided that the exact capacity and tional inductance deviation of individual load
inductance in every loading section were known. ing coils from the average of all the coils, at
But in practice this would involve exceedingly the highest frequency, f, in the range considered.
laborious calculations, and it is usually not pos This quantity is denoted by HA.
sible to estimate accurately the capacity and
(b) The root mean square value of the frac
inductance in each circuit in every loading tional deviation of the average capacity of all
section in the cable, but only to estimate average the circuits considered in each loading section
deviations from the mean value.
from the average of the average capacities for
A group of circuits will therefore be considered all the loading sections. This quantity is denoted
as a whole and the theory of probabilities will be by HB
(c) A quantity which will be denoted by He.
invoked in order to achieve the required results.
In general there will be variations of mean capa If no capacity matching is used He will be the
city from one loading section to another and also root mean square value of the fractional devia
variations between the capacities of individual tion of the capacity of each individual circuit
circuits within each loading section. Similarly, in each loading section from the average capac
there will be variations of mean inductance from ity of all the circuits in the section.
www.americanradiohistory.com
-I
54
'
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
20 log10
Vl - W2
w
f
, where W = fc
-4L x
1 -e
o. 1 1s1
1-
antilog10
where T
nL. The values of ST are given on
Fig. 3 (ST is denoted by SN - S in the article
by Mr. Crisson above mentioned) .
Now, at the particular frequency f, the most
probable value of singing point corresponding
to the r.m.s. values of the rectangular compon
ents of the return currents due to the line irreg
ularities is :
=
Sp = SH + Sw + ST - SA
This quantity Sp will
tive singing point at
be noted incidentally
the probable singing
exceeded on
+ of the total
number of circuits
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
+26
+24
+22
+20
FREQUENCY FUNCTION Sw = 20
= j_
\
\
+16
+ 14
+ 12
Lo9 1/' w2
\
I\
+ 10
(/) + e
_J
w
ID
+G
u
w
0
+4
"
I\.
'\
I\.
'\
If) + 2
0
"'
'\
-2
'\
I\
-B
-10
Ol
02
03
04
OS
06
07
OS
09
55
fc
+IB
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
24
ATTENUATION FUNCTION SA :
22
I O
Figure 1
iii
a
1.c
.,,
- 4 l., XQIJ51
LOSS
PER
p9B
LOADIN
,_,___
\'
16
IS
1-e
NOTE:"
SEE IRREC.ULARITIES IN LOADED TELEPHONE
"
CIRCUITS. C.EOR((E CRISSON, EL. COMM VOL.N
20
10 Lo IO
\
\
14
!'2
10
f\
"
I"'-
!'--.
--...
r--.
r-.,...._
4
2
OI
0-2
03
www.americanradiohistory.com
04
o,s
L-DECIBEL.S.
Figure 2
06
01
oa
E L E C T R I C A L
56
1 - --, T
LoglO 2Q
t I r
NOTE:-
.. TOTAL
n"
I\
\
._____
..___
16
"n" SECTIONS
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
._____
._____
'
\
\
c lO
"
I\
O 6
'
04
I'\.
'
......
6
T-OEC IBE LS
......
9
IO
v 7r
Figure 3
minimum singing point over the range 3002200 p :s. shews that this hypothesis is correct
to a very close degree of approximation ; and, for
any normal gauge of medium-heavy loaded side
or phantom circuits, the root mean square devi
ation of the individual minimum singing points
where h
/
V
e-h2s2Q
1
2 X r.m.s. error.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
57
FUNCTION S F" = - 10
Lo9,0 L09e .P
NOT E :"
SEE IRREC,.ULARI T IES IN LOADED TELEPHONE
CIRCUITS . " CiEOR(fE CRISSON , EL. COMM. VOL . N p . 9s.
F
CIRCUITS.
+ 22
+ 20
+IS
+16
+ 14
!I +J2
+ 10
w
ID
i3
w
0
I
IL
Ill
+8
+6
+4
+2
0
<)OJ
-z
-4
-6
-a
..: 10
01
Figure 4
OI
---
0001
www.americanradiohistory.com
---
L-
II
I 0
E L E C T R I C A L
58
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
y - 1L e - h2 sQ2
--/'ff
I
"
ERROR = h./2 = 1 75
h = 0 404
R.M.5.
= 0 228
03
ui
15
02
z
0
i=
!;!
a:
LL
I
,..,
DECIBELS
I\
I
0 1
-6
I/
-S
-4
_b...
l'iT
30
20
\
\
-3
-2
I0
-I
S,,
0
+I
+2
- DECIBELS
+3
't--...
+4
+5
+6
Figure 5
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Summary
To find the probable minimum singing points
for a group of normal loaded circuits, the fol
lowing steps must be taken :
(1) Determine the total representative devia
tion, H, and find the corresponding irregularity
function SH from current ratio tables.
(2) Find Sw from Fig. 1 , SA from Fig. 2
and, for short lines, ST from Fig. 3 . Take Sn
DISTRIBUTION
59
FUNCTION Sq
0 00,
u::ss THAN S.
0'
C' O I
'0
Figure 6
Conclusion
Practical examples have shewn that the
method is capable, if used with caution and
judgment, of giving a useful indication of the
performance which may be expected in any
normal case, provided that the r.m.s. deviations
can be estimated sufficiently accurately.
To obtain absolutely accurate values for the
singing points in any given cable i t would be
necessary to know the deviation of every _m
dividual coil and circuit in every loading section
throughout the cable and the computation in
volved would generally be quite impracticable.
www.americanradiohistory.com
60
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
:r
l
a:
0
z
and
During the flight from Montreal to Chicago and from Chicago to New
York, any of the United States Coast Guard Coast Stations could be reached
by calling NCU on 73 1.7 meters, but no occasion for such emergency communi
cation arose.
With the aid of this chart, the most advantageous station for communica
tion from any point in the area could be selected at a glance.
www.americanradiohistory.com
870 miles
Orbetello--Amsterdam . . . . . . . about
630 "
Amsterdam-Londonderry . . . . . . . . .
930 "
Londonderry-Reykjavik . . . . . . . . . .
Reykjavik-Cartwright . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ,500 "
Cartwright-Shediac . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
800 "
500 "
Shediac-Montreal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
870 "
Montreal-Chicago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
950 "
Chicago--New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
725 "
New York-Shediac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shediac-Shoal Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . .
650 "
Shoal. Harbor-Azores . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,525 "
Azores-Lisbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
968 "
Lisbon-Rome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,351 "
.
www.americanradiohistory.com
62
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Conference of the High Officers of the Cruise: From Left to Right: Capt. Recagno, Capt. Nannini,
.
Gen. Pellegrini, His Excellency Gen. Balbo, Lieut. Col. Longo, Capt. Giordano,
Capt.
Baldini, Capt. Biani and Lieut. Col. Cagna.
Communication Facilities
Regular commercial communications were at
best only seasonal and sporadic at certain places
along the route of the flight, while at others there
existed no communication facilities of any kind.
Complete wire, cable, and radio facilities were
available only at a few of the base sites. Studies
were made of the location and characteristics of
all available communication facilities along the
proposed flight course and steps were taken to
fill in the gaps, through the provision of addi
tional facilities, so as to form an uninterrupted
chain of communications.
The I.T.T. had at its disposal the extensive
network which it possesses in the Western
Hemisphere ; a network comprising the high
power Atlantic coastal and transoceanic stations
of the Mackay Radio System, the high speed
undersea cables of the Commercial Cable Com
pany between North America and Europe, and
the land lines of the Postal Telegraph Company
with its connections to the telegraph system of
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
63
Wavelengths Assigned
In order to avoid interference from com
mercial coastal radio stations and from ships at
sea, various wavelengths were assigned to the
different "Crociera" services as follows :
To communications from assisting vessels and
land bases to and from the flying seaplanes,
840 meters.
To communications exclusively between the
seaplanes themselves, 900 meters.
To radio compass signals from assisting vessels
and Royal Air Force field stations, 900 meters.
To radio compass signals from the yacht
"Alice," 1050 meters.
The yacht "Alice," which was to act as base
ship at Cartwright during the westward flight,
and as base ship at Shoal Harbor during the east
ward flight, arrived at New York toward the end
of April. As had been prearranged, conferences
were held with the Italian officers detailed to the
operation of the ship's radio station and plans
formulated whereby, from the start of the ship's
voyage to the north, daily schedules would be
worked out between the ship and Mackay Radio
stations WSL and WAG, Rockland, Me. This
procedure was necessary to determine the opti
mum frequencies for the various distances and
hourly schedules involved.
These and other tests proved to be particularly
difficult, due to magnetic and electrical storms
to the northward, similar storms near New
York, heavy static, and interference. As a result
of this work, the following conclusions were
reached :
www.americanradiohistory.com
64
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Emergencies
Another phase covered by the communication
system was that of preparing for emergency mes
sages. In order to provide immediate assistance
to any unit of the seaplane squadron while over
65
www.americanradiohistory.com
66
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Lieut. Col. Mario Infante, R.I.A . F., and Lieut. Commander Ellery W. Stone, U.S.N.R., at the
International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation Control Center of the " Crociera. "
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
67
www.americanradiohistory.com
68
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
General
TABLE I
European Wavelength Service Allocation
TYPE
WAVELENGTH
FREQUENCY
SERVICE
RECEIVER
-
SHORT WAVES
MEDIUM WAVES
LONG WAVES
10 to
50 Metres
50 to
200 Metres
200 to
545 Metres
1 ,500 to
550 Kcs.
Broadcasting
545 to
822 Metres
550 to
365 Kcs.
Marine Mobile
822 to
938 Metres
365 to
320 Kcs.
Aircraft Mobile
938 to
1 , 132 Metres
320 to
265 Kcs.
1 , 132 to
1,875 Metres
265 to
160 Kcs.
Broadcasting
1,875 to
3 ,000 Metres
160 to
100 Kcs.
100 to
10 Kcs.
.+-13.5 m
-RM6
--
.+- 250 m
-RM7
-- -
69
www.americanradiohistory.com
.+-1 ,500 m
-RMS
-<-5 ,000 m
.+-22,000 m
70
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I CA L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
BEAT.
osc.
H.F.
AM P.
l5_T OET.
71
2 STAGE
l.F A M P
L.f'
f'ILTER
L.F:
AMP
AUTO
L------t 4AIN
& l . F.
osc.
www.americanradiohistory.com
LIM ITE
E L E C T R I C A L
72
rJ)
J
w
m
w
0
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
10
20
z
0
;:: 30
c(
:l
z
w
IIc(
40
--'-----1..L-
50 '-20
- 10
0
+ I()
+ 20
KILOCYCLES OF"F RESONANCE:.
CURVE
'5
I-
IS
$
g
WITH
c.-
\
L.
I
...._!'--..
"
20
30
'
50
100
soo
1000
F'RQUf;NCY ?ERIOOS PCR SECOHO
5000
10000
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
73
R.M.
Receiver (Long-Wa.ve)
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
74
CURVE
II
I - F'OR
2-
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
TELEPHONE
TELEGRAPH
10
\()
.J
w
CD 20
u
w
0
z 30
0
:::>
z
w 40
I-
50
60 '---'--'----1-l.
- 10
-s
o
+s
+ 10
K I LOCYCLES OFF' RESONANCE: ,
2 STAE
H . F" A M P
DET.
15..! L.F.
AMP
L.F:
f"ILTER
H ET
osc.
www.americanradiohistory.com
2N_DL_f".
AMP
LIMITER
=-'
-
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
75
www.americanradiohistory.com
Civil Aviation
It should be noted that although this study is
based on European practice as regards technique,
the underlying requirements for satisfactory
radio communication for civil aviation are prac
tically universal.
At present the radio services are used for
navigational purposes and not, in general, as a
76
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
77
Open Type Aircraft Used by Standard Telephones and Cables, Limited for
Experiments in Aircraft Radio Communication.
www.americanradiohistory.com
78
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
(b)
www.americanradiohistory.com
79
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
r - - - -- - - - - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
-t--..;;w.t<>- I
----tt
,-t--+----
...JJ
--i----1
IM<
11:1,
91lf'i;
.
---J--"'"::;<W
------
3.
'i"
!: 1:
OOO
PH
:I
I :::,
1 ... r-rc-.-.-.,.,.I
- c.i..o s o
osc:o
F"OR
F'CR
R t;;C El\/INC
TArJS.... 1TT1l".C:i
--.N"""I''"';l;-=
I ;1 ;
I
I
I
I
L
II
__ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ___.
www.americanradiohistory.com
80
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Military Aviation
The full ramifications of military and naval
aviation cannot be described here, but some
general observations are given in connection with
two types of service where radio communication
is vital, viz., Fighter Aircraft and Reconnaissance
Aircraft. Naturally each country has its own
ideas on the function and operation of these two
services but the broad outlines remain the same
in each case, and are briefly described.
Fighter A ircraft-This type of machine is
almost invariably a single seater whose operation
demands all the concentration of the pilot on his
multifarious duties. For this reason radio com
munication must essentially be effected by tele
phony. The functions of the fighter aircraft are to
intercept and destroy enemy machines so that
information is required as to the whereabouts of
hostile formations ; and, once contact has been
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
81
Cabin Type A ircraft Used by Standard Telephones and Cables, J:imited for Experiments
in Aircraft Radio Communication
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
82
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Equipments Developed
The above survey gives some indication as to
the requirements which the radio equipment has
to meet for the various services outlined. Actually
seven distinct types have been developed, several
of them being adaptations of prototypes ; as, for
example, the splitting up of a combined long and
short-wave transmitter into a self-contained long
wave or short-wave model.
The salient features of the various types are
listed below :
The ATR2 equipment is available as a separate
medium-wave equipment (Type ATR4) and a
short-wave equipment (Type ATR5 ) , respec
tively. Similarly, the ATR6 equipment is avail
able as a medium-wave equipment (Type ATR7)
or short-wave (Type ATRS) . The change merely
involves the removal of the short-wave or me
dium-wave tuning unit of the transmitter, as the
case may be. One type of receiver only is used for
all the equipments, whether medium-wave or
short-wave operation, or both, is required. Sim
ilarly, many other pieces of apparatus are com-
Type
WL
Aerial Power
Weight
Notes
ATR2
40/80
500/1000
20w
87 lbs.
ATR3
40/120
20w
77 lbs.
ATR4
500/1000 or
1000/1800
20w
74 lbs.
30/60 or
40/80
20w
75 lbs.
30/60 or
40/80 or
550/ 1 1 00
70w
105 lbs.
ATR7
550/1 100
70w
98 lbs.
ATR8
30/60 or
40/80 or
90/180
70w
98 lbs.
ATRS
ATR6
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
83
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I L---
I
I
I
L----- -- - - - - --------- --------
"'?"
www.americanradiohistory.com
84
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
85
A TR2 Receiver.
www.americanradiohistory.com
86
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
87
www.americanradiohistory.com
88
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
15
(2) Receiver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13%
m.
"
"
7%
(Over cable gland)
Height
11
7
m.
"
6;!4 "
Depth
6 ,Y:l in.
6 Ys
4
"
"
4:\4 in.
5% "
3% "
Weight
19 lbs.
14 lbs.
4 lbs.
22 lbs.
"
4;!4
(Over plug)
2
"
2 lbs. 12 oz.
1 lb.
3 oz.
1 lb.
3 oz.
4 lbs.
5 lbs.
4 lbs.
www.americanradiohistory.com
77 lbs. 2 oz.
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
89
www.americanradiohistory.com
90
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
Height
147,:l in.
11
13 %" "
7 "
6 7,:l "
5% "
7% "
(over cable
gland)
3% "
1 3 Yz in. long
(generator only)
7 in.
in.
Depth
Weight
8 %: in.
(over plug)
1 8 72 lbs.
SY,
"
(over plug)
4 in.
2
"
5 7 in. dia.
4 7,:l "
4 in.
(over plug)
14
lbs.
lbs.
1 7,:l lbs.
22
lbs.
2 % lbs.
2
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
Total Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 5 Yz lbs.
2 7,:l lbs.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
91
www.americanradiohistory.com
92
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
93
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
94
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
CouNTRit:s
NORTH AMERICA:
United States . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Central America . . . . . . .
Mexico . . . . . . . . .
West Indies:
Cuba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Porto Rico . . . . . . . . . .
Other W. I. Places . . . . .
Other No. Am. Places . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
205 . 7 1 1
1 1 ,175
1,427
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOUTH AMERICA:
Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bolivia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Colombia . . . . . .
Ecuador . . . . . . .
. . . . .
Paraguay . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uruguay . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Venezuela . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other So. Am. Places . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. .
. . . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EUROPE:
Austria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
Belgium** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
Bulgaria . . . . . . . .
Czechoslovakia . .
.
Denmark# . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
Finland . . . . .
. .
:nyif: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
.
.
.
.
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . .
. .
. .
.
.
. .
. . .
. . . .
. . .
. .
. .
.
. .
. . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
........
. . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . .
. .
.
:::::: ::::::::
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AFRICA:
Egyp t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Union of South Africa# . . . . . . .
Other Places in Africa . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . .
OCEANIA:
Australia* . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dutch East Indies . . . . . .
Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Zealand# . . . . . . . . . .
Philippine Islands . . . . . .
Other Places in Oceania .
Total . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
.
. .
.
.
13.94
1 1 .98
0.39
0.62
.14%
.04%
.06%
.03%
1.13
0.74
0.31
3.14
226,436
18,673.282
18,899,718
57.37%
1 1.01
318,331
2,018
169.693
44,414
28,652
3.275
2.601
15.279
29,378
22,000
318,331
2,018
1 70,393
44,414
3 1 , 152
6,275
2,601
15.279
29,378
2 2,600
2,770
.96%
.01%
.52%
.13%
.09%
.02%
.01%
.05%
.09%
.07%
.01%
2.74
0.06
0.39
1.02
0.34
0.25
0.30
0.24
1 .49
0.69
0.52
635,641
645 , 2 1 1
1.96%
0.73
.73%
.94%
.06%
.51%
1.08%
.41%
3.92%
8.99%
6.52%
.05%
.34%
.10%
1.42%
.14%
. 18%
1.01%
.60%
.56%
. 1 3%
. 16%
1.73%
.85%
1.75%
1.05%
.34%
3.55
3. 7 7
0.32
1.12
9.82
3.63
3.07
4.51
4.62
0.26
1.26
1.11
1.10
0.33
3.04
4.07
6.96
0.57
0.64
0.28
0.34
1.21
9.33
8.43
1.37
700
2,500
3,000
600
2,770
12,583
239,495
309,861
19.646
167,896
356,573
134,65 1
1 , 292.254
2.960,401
2 , 1 46.409
1 7 , 299
1 1 1 ,285
32 .642
467,066
46,856
58,809
332.858
197.683
183,967
43,531
5 1 ,191
569 , 1 1 1
280,942
577,281
346,205
113,303
9,521 ,996
1.535,219
1 1 ,05 7.215
33.57%
2.01
2 2 , 109
72,000
965,390
153,708
35, 1 83
75.000
19,398
57,292
147 .000
965,390
173,106
.17%
.45%
2.93%
.53%
0.02
0.03
1 .44
0.14
1,213,207
129,581
1,342,788
4.08%
0. 13
45.489
116,360
95,647
1.198
45,489
1 1 6,360
96.845
.14%
.35%
.29%
0.22
1 .40
0.09
257 ,496
1 , 198
258,694
.78%
0.18
3,657
24.206
3 ,803
20.516
228
484,626
43,407
24,206
155,560
26,516
3 ,629
1.47%
. 1 3%
.08%
.47%
.08%
.01%
7.40
0.07
5.90
10.12
0.20
0. 16
2.24%
0.84
100.003
1.61
239.495
299,947
19,646
148,366
15.803
1,651
1,292.254
2,960,401
2 , 146,409
110,565
32,642
46.112
58.809
332,858
1 19,683
95, 1 1 7
10,445
569 , 1 1 1
575,757
346,205
100,720
151.757
6,000
3,401
52.89%
3.83%
.08%
.30%
44.572
1 1 ,874
20,796
1 1 ,379
484,626
39,750
TOTAL WORLD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
1 7 .424,406
1.261 .245
25,342
100,104
Telephones
Per 100
Population
44,087
1 1 ,337
13,695
1 1 ,379
9,570
ASIA:
British India# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
f:;:#: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . ,. .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17,424,406
1 ,055.534
14.167
98.677
Per Cent
of Total
World
485
537
7,101
.
.
NUMBER OF TELEPHONES
Private
Companies
9,914
19,530
340.770
133,000
1 7,299
720
467,066
744
78.000
88,850
33,086
5 1 , 191
280.942
1,524
685,534
52,410
1 1 .914,239
2 1 ,027,331
737,944
32,941,570
www.americanradiohistory.com
_,
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
95
COUNTRIES
NORTH AMERICA:
United States . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Central America . . . . . . .
Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
West Indies:
Cuba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Porto Rico . . . . . . . . . .
Other W. I. Places . . . . .
Other No. Am. Places . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
P.
P.G.
P.G.
P.
87,6 78,000
5 ,089,000
58,000
5 14,000
58.333
3.383
.043
.343
70. 14
48.33
0.88
3.01
2,260,000
366,000
20,000
85,000
34.273
5.553
.303
1.293
1.81
3.48
0.31
0.50
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P.
P.
P.G.
P.
298,000
3 2,000
91,000
19 ,000
.203
.023
.063
.013
7.58
1.99
1.38
5.25
14,000
1 ,000
5 ,500
1 1 ,000
.213
.023
.083
.173
0.36
0.06
0.08
3.04
9;l,779 ,000
62.383
4.64
2 ,762,500
41.893
1.61
10.11
0.17
1.45
4.58
0.81
0.24
0.34
0.74
2.39
1.83
1.04
200,000
5,000
105,000
34,000
2 1,000
4,000
2 ,500
13 ,000
7,500
7,000
500
3.033
.083
1.593
.513
.323
.063
.043
.203
.113
.113
.013
1.72
0.16
0.24
0.78
0.23
0.16
0.28
0.20
0.38
0.21
0.15
1.5 1 3
2.58
399,500
6.063
0.45
.493
1.083
.043
.373
.76%
.22
3 .00 0
10. 1 1 3
6.983
.043
.263
.083
.88
.10 0
.173
.633
.393
.583
.083
.123
.473
.763
1.353
.703
.223
10.85
19.67
1.07
3.71
3 1 .49
9.11
10.69
23.17
22.61
0.95
4.45
4.07
3.14
1.01
13.28
1 1 .63
20.68
2.70
1.65
0.99
0.42
4.91
32.71
25.80
3.94
48,000
32,000
8,000
82,000
1 1 ,000
1 1 ,000
523 ,000
134,000
344,000
34,000
49,000
22 ,000
250,000
5 7,000
4,500
22 ,000
28,000
60,000
14,000
43,000
200,000
9 1 ,000
36,000
16,000
25 ,000
.733
.49%
.123
1.243
.173
.173
7.933
2.033
5.223
.523
.743
.333
3.793
.863
.073
.333
.433
.913
.213
.653
3.033
1.383
.553
.243
.38%
0.71
0.39
0.13
0.55
0.30
0.30
1.24
0.20
0.74
0.52
0.55
0.75
0.59
0.40
0.23
0.27
0.99
0.18
0.20
0.24
0.12
0.39
0.58
0.39
0.30
44,916,000
29.88%
8.16
2, 144,500
32.523
0.39
385,000
474,000
3,470,000
491 ,000
.263
.313
2.313
.33%
0.11
0.11
5.18
0.39
432,000
130,000
184,000
157 ,000
6.553
1.973
2.793
2.38%
0.12
0.03
0.27
0.12
4,820,000
3.2 1 %
0.48
903,000
13.693
0.09
266,000
500,000
239,000
.183
.333
.163
1.26
6.01
0.21
35 ,000
32 ,000
150,000
.533
.493
2.273
0.17
0.39
0.13
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.G.
P.
P.
P.
P.
G.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
G.
G.
G.
P.G.
P.
P.
G.
G.
G.
P.
G.
G.
P.
G.
G.
G.
P.G.
P.G.
P.G.
P.
G.
P.
G.
G.
P.G.
. . . . . . .
.......
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASIA:
British India# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Places in Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . .
AFRICA:
Egypt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Union of South Africaf, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Places in Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . .
. . . . . .
OCEANIA:
Australia* . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dutcq . East Indies . . . . . .
Hawa11. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Zealand# . . . . . . . . . .
Philippine Islands . . . . . .
Other Places in Oceania .
Total .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL WORLD .
. . .
P.G.
P.G.
G.
P.G.
.783
.0043
.433
.133
.053
.0043
.0023
.033
.033
.043
.0043
1 , 1 75,000
5,500
640,000
200,000
74,000
6,000
3 ,000
47,000
47,000
60,000
5 ,500
2 ,263 ,000
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
Number
of Miles
.
.
.
.
EUROPE:
Austria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Belgium** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Czechoslovakia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Denmark# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Germany# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Great Britain & No. Ireland# . .
Greece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Irish Free State# . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jugo-Slavia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Latvia# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Norway* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roumania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Russia I[ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Switzerland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Places in Europe . . . . . . . .
Total . .
Per 100
Population
.
.
.
.
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOUTH AMERICA:
Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bolivia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ecuador . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paraguay . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uruguay . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Venezuela . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other So. Am. Places . .
G.
G.
P.G.
731 ,000
1,617,000
65 ,000
556,000
1 ,1 43 ,000
338,000
4,504,000
15,200,000
10,500,000
62 ,000
393,000
120,000
*1 ,329,000
145,000
257,000
950,000
587,000
877,000
113,000
180,000
700,000
1 , 140,000
2,025 ,000
1 ,060,000
324,000
-----
----
----
.67%
0.71
2 1 7 ,000
3.293
0.15
2,535 ,000
246,000
87 ,000
600,000
64,000
8,000
1.683
.16%
.063
.403
.043
.013
38.71
0.39
21.22
39.04
0.48
0.35
101 ,000
2 7 ,000
0
25,000
1 1 .000
4,000
1.533
.413
.003
.383
.173
.063
1.54
0.04
0.00
1.63
0.08
0.17
1 , 005,000
G.
G.
P.
G.
P.G.
P.G.
3 ,540,000
2.353
4.03
168,000
2.553
0.19
150,323 ,000
100.003
7.36
6,594,500
100.003
0.32
In connection with telephone wire, P. indiNOTE: Telegraph service is operated by Governments. except in the United States and Canada.
cates that the telephone service is wholly or predominantly operated by private companies. G. wholly or predominantly by the Government, and
P.G. by both private companies and the Government. See preceding table.
* June 30, 1932.
** February 28, 1933.
# March 3 1 , 1933.
'II U.S.S.R. including Siberia and Associated Republics.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
96
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
NUMBER OF TELEPHONES
In Communities
In Communities
Service
In Communities
In Communities
of less than
of 50,000
COUNTRY
Operated
of 50,000
of less than
50,000
Population
by
Population
50,000
and Over
Population
(See Note)
and Over
Population
6.43
8.35
208,226
276,400
G.
Australia* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.42
7.57
62,320
177,175
G.
Austria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.13
6.09
102,861
207,000
Belgium** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G.
7.96
21.02
580,245
681,000
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P.G.
0.81
3.61
Czechoslovakia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P.G.
60,547
1 07,349
7.13
17.58
190,437
167,563
Denmark. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P.
2.61
10.49
84,500
50,151
P.
Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.66
8.36
553,236
739,018
G.
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.67
7.22
1 ,043 ,186
1 ,917,215
G.
Germany# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.01
5.99
613 ,800
1,561,800
Great Britain and No. Ireland# . . . . . . . .
G.
0.38
4.93
27,067
84,218
G.
Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.72
3.36
349,513
615,877
G.
Japan#. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.35
6.69
116 ,003
216,855
G.
Netherlands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.62
1 1 .06
New Zealand# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G.
58,845
96,715
18.53
5.04
122,810
74,873
Norway* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P.G.
0.26
2.35
72,825
1 1 1 , 142
Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P.G.
0.62
3.54
113 ,941
167,001
P.
Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.73
348,036
22.45
229,245
G.
Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.88
190,725
18.00
155,480
Switzerland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G.
6.46
52,200
63,400
0.71
Union of South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G.
10.17
7,582
,035
19.52
9,842,371
P.
United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NoTE: P. indicates that the telephone service is wholly or predominantly operated by private companies. G. wholly or predominantly by the
Government, and P.G. by both private companies and the Government. See first table.
* June 30, 1932.
** February 28 , 1933.
# March 3 1 , 1933.
TELEPHONE DEVELOPMENT
I N THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE
WIRE COMMUNICATIONS
PER CENT OF
PER CAPITA
TOTAL WIRE
COMMUNICATIONS
Total Number
Telephone
Telephone
of Wire
Telegrams Total
Conver- Telegrams ConverCommunicasations
sations
tions
62.9
2.1
60.8
3.3
96.7
410,423 ,000
83.1
0.3
82.8
0.3
559,716,000
99.7
28.5
0.8
27.7
2.7
233,287 ,000
97.3
225.5
1.0
224.5
0.4
99.6
2 ,356,509,000
19.1
0.3
18.8
1.6
284,428 ,000
98.4
152.3
0.5
151.8
0.3
99.7
5 5 1 , 145,000
0.1
47.7
47.6
0.3
176,531 ,000
99.7
21.2
0.7
20.5
3.5
96.5
893,074,000
33.3
0.3
33.0
0.8
2 , 1 79,455 ,000
99.2
34.0
1.0
33.0
2.8
1,574,884,000
97.2
15.3
0.2
1.5
15.1
135 ,066,000
98.5
52.4
0.7
51.7
98.6
3,484,352,000
1.4
48.5
0.4
48.1
0.9
393,563 ,000
99.1
208.5
2.7
205.8
1.3
319,177,000
98.7
91.9
1.1
90.8
1.2
260,058,000
98.8
21.3
0.1
2
1
.
2
0.5
686,984,000
99.5
28.8
0.9
27.9
3.0
665,000,000
97.0
138.2
0.6
137.6
0.4
853,653 ,000
99.6
64.2
0.5
63.7
0.8
263,2 74,000
99.2
24.4
0.5
23.9
201,427,000
2.2
97.8
205.8
25 ,648,000,000
204.6
1.2
0.6
99.4
long distance messages. Telegrams include inland and outgoing interna-
January
6.5 %
F R A NC E --- ''"'
4 cyo
ALL OTHER
EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES
J4 C}'o
1903
19 1 3
1923
ALL OTH ER
CANADA ---
4 '%
www.americanradiohistory.com
I . 1 9 33
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
97
Number
of
Telephones
Telephones
Per 100
Population
2,910,000
172, 100
5.91
326,000
334,000
1 ,028,000
1,262 ,000
27 ,656
24,715
92,253
106,472
8.48
7.40
8.97
8.68
167,000
2 ,000,000
8,088
157,432
4.84
7.87
AUSTRIA:
Graz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vienna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BELGIUM :
Antwerp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brussels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liege . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
530,000
958,000
427,000
3 7,363
97,210
2 1 ,605
7.05
10.15
5.06
BRAZIL:
Rio de Janeiro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,700,000
49,850
2.93
990,000
185,700
756,800
191,000
175,672
36,501
193,885
53,644
17.74
19.66
25.62
28.09
1,000,000
850,000
1,500,000
1 ,500,000
7,300
14,620
1 2 , 162
44,605
0.73
1.72
0.81
2.97
CANADA:
Montreal . . .
Ottawa . . . . .
Toronto . . . .
Vancouver . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. , .
CHINA:
Canton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
clfn: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Shanghai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CUBA:
Havana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
750,000
35 ,208
4.69
CZECHOSLOVAKIA:
Prague . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
890,000
37 ,329
4.19
DANZIG:
Free City of Danzig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
240,000
16,765
6.99
DENMARK:
Copenhagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
798,000
151,727
19.01
FINLAND:
Helsingfors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
260,000
35,183
13.53
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
265,000
202,000
665,000
860,000
2,900,000
18,457
16,334
33,471
30,407
434,066
6.96
8.09
5.03
3.54
14.97
4,241 ,000
618,000
743,000
700,000
585,000
649,000
635 ,000
1 ,636,000
771 ,000
736,000
469,270
40,890
63,898
58,2 1 1
23,225
28,426
61 ,427
153,547
64,879
73,569
1 1 .07
6.61
8.60
8.31
3.97
4.38
9.68
9.39
8.42
10.00
415 ,000
1 , 188,000
414,000
442,000
1 , 185,000
5 10,000
1,190,000
9,090,000
1,097,000
470,000
516 ,000
17,516
56,027
20,196
30,497
5 7,833
23,224
56,983
798,153
63,712
19,229
19,287
4.22
4.72
4.88
6.90
4.88
4.55
4.79
8.84
5.81
4.09
3.74
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
138,000
16,189
1 1 .73
1,021 ,000
138,000
73,928
1 ,998
7.24
1.45
. .
419,000
17,601
4.20
FRANCE :
Bordeaux . . . .
Lille . . . . . . . .
Lyons . . . . . . .
Marseilles . . .
Paris . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
GERMANY: #
Berlin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Breslau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cologne . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dresden . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dortmund. . . . . . . . . . . .
Essen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Frankfort-on-Main . . . . .
ton
"
Munich . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . .
,,.,.,
. .
,...........,.....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
rci:: : : .. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
4t1 'i'i
A
lulu .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NO. IRELAND : #
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
,................
. . ,. . . . .. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HUNGARY:
Budapest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Szeged . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IRISH FREE STATE:
Dublin# . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
www.americanradiohistory.com
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
98
ITALY :
Genoat . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Milan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Romet . . . . . . . . . .
JAPAN:#
Kobe . . . . .
Kyoto . . . .
Nagoya . .
Osaka. . . .
Tokio . . . .
LATV.IA:
R1gaj)",.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
29,153
82,120
65,173
4.49
8.11
6.90
820,000
1,000,000
960,000
2,600,000
5,300,000
30,933
39,219
3 1 ,489
1 10,740
184,034
3.77
3.92
..28
4.26
3.47
406,000
2 1 ,732
5.35
1 , 100,000
51 ,492
4.68
775 ,000
155,000
615 ,000
500,000
53 ,080
1 1 ,505
40,3 10
47,283
6.85
7.42
6.55
9.45
210,000
21,011
10.01
250,000
49,562
19.82
388,000
1 7 ,540
4.52
850,000
1 ,200,000
13,679
56,100
1.61
4.68
612 ,000
24,823
4.06
600,000
20,252
3.38
2 ,250,000
3 ,000,000
72,349
106,776
3.21
3.56
1 ,000,000
950,000
45,200
52,116
4.52
5.49
25 1 ,000
1 3 1 ,000
438,000
40,746
20,005
139,407
16.23
15.27
3 1 .83
.
.
NETHERLANDS:
Amsterdam . . .
Haarlem . . . . . .
Rotterdam . . . .
The Hague . . .
. .
. .
. .
..
NEW ZEALAND:
Aukland1;' . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NORWAY:
Oslo* . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS:
Manila. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POLAND:
Lodz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warsaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PORTUGAL:
Lisbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROUMANIA:
Bucharest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RUSSIA:
Leningrad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moscow . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SPAIN:
Barcelona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Madrid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SWEDEN:
Gothenburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Malmo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SWITZERLAND:
Basel. . . . . . . . .
Berne . . . . . . . .
Geneva . . . . . . .
Zurich . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Telephone
Per 100
Populatio1
650,000
1,013 ,000
945,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MEXICO:
Mexico City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number
of
Telephones
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
149,000
1 13,000
145,000
260,000
28,102
22,019
25,860
50,659
18.86
19.49
17.83
19.48
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
.. . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
..
..
7, 1 14,000
3, 52 1 ,000
1,357,000
1 ,000,100
2 1 ,894,600
745,100
672,000
587,800
5,980,800
498,600
4 1 1 ,400
295,500
242 ,000
233,800
1,576,616
831,679
362,597
193,838
4,618,727
138,772
245,196
195,683
1,236,351
1 2 1 ,456
107,083
87,682
52 ,869
6 1 ,691
22.16
23.62
26.72
19.38
21.10
18.62
36.49
33.29
20.67
24.36
26.03
29.67
2 1 .85
26.39
. . . . . . . . . . .
10,270,500
1 , 9 18,542
18.68
38,145,900
7 , 773,620
20.38
NOTE: There are shown, for purposes of comparison with cities in other countries, the total development of all cities in the United States in certai
population groups, and the development of certain representative cities within each of such groups.
t January 1, 1932.
* Jnne 30, 1932.
If March 3 1, 1933.
www.americanradiohistory.com
E L E C T R I C A L
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
The Telephone
R1GDT AnM
OF
99
MooEB,N Bus1NESS
the home office, covers his territory by telephoning his salesmen-a few
A bookkeeper calls the order clerk on the floor below about an irregu
larity in a hill, and without leaving their desks the matter is straightened
out in a few seconds.
Thus millions upon millions of work hours every day are saved to
business through the telephone-multiplying earning power-eliminat
ing untold expense and waste-sweeping away confusion.
Business.
www.americanradiohistory.com
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
E L E C T R I C A L
100
I NTERNATIONAL
TELEPHO N E AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A RTHUR M. A NDERSON
S osTHENES B EHN, President
F. W ILDER B ELLAMY
RUSSELL c. L 1cFFINGWELL
J. P. Morgan & Co.
EDWARD
Chairman,
J. B ERWIND
C LARENCE H
Company
President,
and Comptroller
P HILIP K. CONDICT
Vice-President, International
Corporation
President,
Electric
Standard
uTLER
JoHN W.
Edward B. Smith & Co.
Palmer,
Financier
E. D UNLAP
EORGE
Wardwell
Davis Polit
Coal Mining
Company
President,
H. GARDINER
Gardiner
S. G
& Reed
AU
A . H. GRISWOLD
America
Cables,
Incorporated
WALTER E. OGILVIE
Havana
Terminal
Railrond
HENRY B. 0RDE
Shanghai
Teleohone
Comoany
B RADLEY W. PALMER
Dodge . Barstow.
Boston
'Vi1ldns
E.
Company
& Davis
PINGREE
EORGE
International Standard Electric
Corporation
rnBs
EORGE
President, Postal Telegraph and Cable Corporation
J OIN L M ERRILL
President,
R. FULTON CUTTING
HARLES
President, Berwind-Whito
MACKAY
G.
HoYT
LLEN
Vice-President, The National City Bank of New York
and Cable
GEORGE H. GARDINER
General Counsel
OFFICERS
President
SosTHENES BEHN
Vice-Presidents
LEWIS J. PROCTOR
GEORGE E. P I N GREE
PHILIP K. CONDICT
]AMES E. FULLAM
Vice-President
and
General Attorney
WOLCOTT H. PITKIN
Secretary
SAMUEL G. ORDWAY
JOHN L. 1ERRILL
FRANK w. PHELAN
WILLIAM F. REPP
A. H. GRISWOLD
Vice-President
and
Technical Director
GE RALD DEAKIN
General
Vice-President
and
Con1ptroller
EDWIN F. CHINLUND
Treasurer
J QSEPH A. REDEGELD
'e1
FRANK C. p AGE
Lo G AN N. R o c K
GE O RGE s. G I B B S
www.americanradiohistory.com
Licensee Companies
B ELL TELEPHONE MAN UFACTURING COMPANY
Branches: Brussels.
. A ntwerp, Belgium
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Berne, Switzerland
. . . . . . . The Hague, Holland
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shanghai, China
Branches: Canton, Hankow, Harbin, Hongkong, Peiping, Tientsin.
. .
..
Branches: Osaka, Dairen, Taihoku.
.
..
Aires, A rgentina
Branch Office,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
.
......
. . . Buenos
. ... . . .
Paris, France
Tokyo, Japan
. Copenhagen, Denmark
. . . . . . . Oslo, Norway
0. 0 . .
..
. .
. . . . . . . Warsaw, Poland
'
. ..
Prague, Czechoslovakia
Branch: Bratislava.
STANDARD ELECTRICA ROMANA S/ A . . . . .
'
. . . . . .
'
'
. . . Bucharest, Rumania
s. A . . . . . . . . .
Branches: Barcelona, Santander.
STANDARD ELECTRICA,
'
. . . . Madrid, Spain
. . Lisbon, Portugal
..
. . . . . . . Milan, Italy
Branch: Rome.
.
..
.
London, England
Branches: Birmingham, Glasgow, Leeds, Manchester, Dublin, Cairo, J ohannes
burg, Calcutta, Singapore.
.
. .. .. .. .
Sydney, A ustralia
. . . . Budapest, Hungary
. . . . . . . Osaka, Japan
www.americanradiohistory.com
Austria