Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Franz Steiner Verlag is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Historia:
Zeitschrift fr Alte Geschichte.
http://www.jstor.org
2
3
M. Steinbrecher,Der delisch-attischeSeebundund die athenisch-spartanischenBeziehungen in der kimonischen Ara (Stuttgart 1985), 49.
Miszellen
375
Diod Sic. 11.44.2, 11.60.5; Plut. Kim. 12.5; T. Petit, "Pr6senceet influence perses A
Chypre,"AchaemenidHistoryVI (Leiden 1991), 161-178.
8 Hdt. 5.25-8, 6.33; SimonidesF89; Thuc.1.94.2;Diod Sic. 11.44.2-3; Nepos Paus. 2.1-2;
Paus. 3.4.9; Plut. Kim.6.3; W. T. Loomis, "Pausanias,Byzantionand the Formationof
the Delian League. A ChronologicalNote,"Historia 39 (1990), 487-92.
9 J. M. Balcer, "Byzantium,"in E. Yarshatar(ed.), EncyclopaediaIranica, vol. 4, fasc. 6
(London 1990), 599-600.
10 Ionia is absentin Thuc. 1.98-9andDiod Sic. 11.44.2-3;J. M. Balcer,Spardaby the Bitter
Sea (Chico, Calif. 1984) 330-4; J. M. Balcer, "The East Greeks underPersianRule: A
Reassessment,"AchaemenidHistory VI, 557-65; M. Corsaro, "Gli loni tra Greci e
Persiani:il problemadell'identitAionica nell dibattitoculturalee politico del V secolo,"
Achaemenid History VI, 41-55.
376
Miszellen
tributelists for 453 B.C. and thereafter,highly suspect for their many lacunae, we note the
absence of Ionian poleis at the mouthsof the majoreast-west riversin Anatolia,which flow
into the East Greek Ionian region. This strongly suggests that settlementsat those riverine
deltas were not liberated,Greekruled,or membersof the Delian Confederacy,but remained
underPersiancontrol.The Hermosvalley andits small village of Smyrnaformedan important
coastal zone and outlet for the overlandroutefrom Sardisto Smyrnaand the coast. This area
the Persians diligently attemptedto retain. They similarly controlled the rural regions of
Myous, east of Miletos. In losing Ephesos, however, the Persiansno longer controlledthe
terminusof the Royal Road from Sardisto thatreligiouscenter.Yet to the north,the Persians
still claimed the ruralsections of MyrinaandGryneion.Northof Atarneus,in the coastal and
valley regions of the Kaikos River, the exiled SpartanBasileus Damaratosheld the towns of
Pergamum,Teuthrania,and Halisarnafor his sovereign Xerxes who had grantedhim those
2Nearby, the
urbancenters shortlybefore the PersianexpeditionagainstAthens in 480 B.C.'2
EretrianGongylos, also in exile, held the centersof GambreionandPalaigambreionas well as
ruralregions of Myrinaand Gryneion.I3The head of the Gulf of Adramyttionmay also have
remainedsecure under Persian control and bound to the Persian satrapalsystem of strong
vassalage holdings similarto those of Damaratosand Gongylos. This zone, often considered
partof Lesbos' mainlandterritories,remainedthe importantnorthernlittoralfor the satrapyof
Spardacentered in Sardis. In the Troad, the ruralregions of Perkote and Lampsakosalso
continued under Persian control, and the regions of the Proponticcoast east of Kyzikos
remainedunderthe satrapalcontrolof Daskyleion,just south of Kyzikos.'4
The Persians,therefore,had not entirely abandonedtheir controlof Sparda'scoast, but
retained garrisons in several key regions that could be substantiallygoverned during this
turbulentperiod. The areas where the governmentsof Sardis and Daskyleion maintained
militaryand political control,successfullyduringthe secondquarterof the fifth centuryB.C.,
were the major east-west river valleys and their coastal outlets into the Aegean Sea: the
Maeandervalley from Magnesiaand the ruralregions of Myous, the Hermosvalley and the
villages of Nymphaionand Smyrna,the Kaikosvalley and its coastalruralregionsof Myrina
and Gryneion from the up river centers of Pergamum,Teuthrania,and Halisarna,and the
terminusof the inlandroutefrom Sardisto Adramyttionat the headof its gulf.
The geographical structureof the strategically importantriver valleys that traversed
Spardafrom its core westwardto the Aegean providednaturaland militaryviable routesfor
continued Persian control as did the networkof inlandroutes from Sardis and Daskyleion.
Daskyleion's attemptto retaincontrolof the ruralregions of Perkoteand Lampsakosacross
the rugged mountains of Mysia and the Troad, however, did present problems, yet she
maintainedthat connection. In the mid-century,Persianpresence in the Troadjust beyond
Sigeion persistedas a majorproblemfor thatEast Greekpolis.15The majorloss sufferedby
12
13
14
15
Erythrai(includingthe foursubordinatemainlandkomaiin hersyntely),Gargara,Gryneion, Hairai, Isinda, Klazomenai, Kolophon, Kyme, Lamponeia,Lebedos, Maiandros,
Marathesion,Miletos, Myous, Notion, Phokaia,Pitane,Priene,Pygela, andTeos.
Xen. Anab. 2.1-3, 7.8.17, Hell. 3.1.6; Plut. Them.29.7; Paus. 3.7.7; Athen.Deip. 1.29;J.
Hofstetter,Die Griechenin Persien (Berlin 1979), 45-6.
Thuc. 1.128.6; Xen. Hell. 3.1.6; Diod. Sic. 11.44.3; Nepos Paus. 2.2; Hofstetter,Die
Griechenin Persien (cit. n. 12), 70-1.
Thuc. 1.138.5; Xen. Hell. 2.16; Plut. Them.29.1 1; Athen.Deip. 1.29; Schol. Ar. Eq. 84;
ATL 3.196; J. M. Balcer, "FifthCenturyB.C. Ionia: A FrontierRedefined,"Revuedes
ttudes anciennes 87 (1985), 31-42.
IG I3 17; SEG X 13.
Miszellen
377
the Persians due to the Greek liberationof the littoral regions, however, was the Thracian
Chersonesealong the westernshoreof the Hellespontandthe key garrisonof Byzantionon the
Bosporos.Perhapsonly at Alopekonnesoson the westerncoast of the ThracianChersonesedid
Persianforces hold out.16
This implies, within this argument,that the Persian Empire retained control of the
riverinedeltas into the easternAegeanregionandthatthe DelianConfederatedGreekshadnot
liberatedthe entireeasterncoast in the 470s or even later.Persiancontrolof the urbancenters
(aste) of Ionian Erythrai,'7and Miletos, c.454 B.C.,18demonstrablyillustrates continued
Persianinterferencein Ionianaffairswell into the mid-fifthcenturyB.C.
The Ohio State University,Columbus
JackMartinBalcer
16 ATL3.205-6.
17 IG I3. 14; revised text by H. EnglemannandR. Merkelbach,Die Inschriftenvon Erythrai
und KlazomenaiI (Bonn 1972), 38-47; ATL 1.446-7, 484; R. Meiggs, The Athenian
Empire(Oxford 1972), 112-5, 421-2.
18 ATL 1.328, 346; IG I3. 21; [Xen.] Ath. Pol. 3.1 1; Meiggs, AthenianEmpire(cit. n. 17),
115-6; B.D. Meritt,"TheTributeQuotaList of 454/3 B.C.,"Hesperia41 (1972), 406-10;
H.-J. Gehrke,"ZurGeschichteMilets in der Mitte des 5. Jahrhunderts
v. Chr.,"Historia
29 (1980), 17-31; J. M. Balcer, "Miletos (IG 12. 22 [I3. 21]) and the Structuresof
Alliances," in W. Schuller (ed.), Studien zum attischen Seebund:Xenia, Konstanzer
althistorische Vortrageund Forschungen(Konstanz1984), 11-30.
C. ALFIUSFLAVUS
Alfius' shows up in few ancient sources, but those few have not been fully or properly
understood.His unsuccessfulpraetoriancandidacyhas been wronglydated;once we unlearn
that untruth,we can establisha lower terminusfor his date of birthand for his quaestorship.
Early in 562 Cicero spoke publicly aboutthe reactionof Caesarto a recentelection:
C. Caesarem.-dixisse C. Alfium praeteritum permoleste tulisse, quod in homine summam
fidem probitatemque cognosset, graviterque etiam se ferre praetorem aliquem esse
factum qui a suis rationibus dissensisset (Vat. 38).3
2
3
114, and thoughAlfius is not explicitly namedhere, the context ensures that he and his
repulsa are under discussion: non tenuit eum locum in quem, nisi popularis esse voluisset,