Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Experimental and numerical methods are used to study the stability problem of cylindrical
shells with cut-outs. The paper presents parametric research of the shape (square, rectangular,
circular), the dimensions (axial and circumferential sizes, diameter) of the hole. The effect of
the location and the number of the holes are also studied. The analysis indicates that the
critical load is sensitive to the opening angle or circumferential size of the hole. The function
(critical load-opening angle) is linear for large openings and independent of the geometrical
imperfections of the shell. However for small openings, it is necessary to take into account
the coupling between the initial geometrical imperfections and the openings. The linear
approach does not fit because of the importance of the evolution of the displacements near
the openings. These results will be used for the development of European rules. 1998
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Opening; Buckling; Cylindrical shell; Axial compression
1. Introduction
In many industrial applications, shells are equipped with openings of various
shapes, sizes and locations within the lateral surface. The objective of the present
paper is to improve the understanding of the effect of cut-outs on the critical buckling
load of thin cylindrical shells.
Little work has been done in the literature on the subject. Early work dates back
to Tennyson [1], who performed an experimental study on the effect of small circular
* Corresponding author
0263-8231/98/$see front matter 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 6 3 - 8 2 3 1 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 0 3 - 2
188
openings on shells which buckle in the elastic range. This work was followed by
Starnes [2] and Toda [3], who tested shells with a larger range of opening diameters.
Knodel and Schulz [4] were the first to perform tests on steel cylinders with a large
spectrum of imperfections (geometry, loading, material). This gave the possibility for
a statistical evaluation of the buckling strength of shells. At the same time no physical
understanding of the phenomenon was gained.
The first numerical calculations on cylindrical shells with cut-outs were reported
by Almroth and Holmes [5]. Based on the available results, Samuelson and Eggwertz
[6] proposed a simple analytical description of the effect of the diameter of the hole
on the buckling strength of shells.
None of the above-mentioned researches have provided sufficient information to
develop a reliable physical model of the considered problem, or to deduce a general
understanding. Many tests had been carried out with specimens in Mylar, giving a
purely elastic buckling, and the studied parameters did not take into account the
meridional or circumferential size of rectangular openings, or the position of the
opening in relation to the boundaries. Furthermore, the analysis of coupling geometrical imperfections with openings has not been carried out.
In order to achieve this goal, a new study has been performed on steel shells
subjected to uniaxial compressive load. The non-uniform axial stress induced by the
opening induces an internal bending, and is included in this work.
A series of tests have been undertaken with different shapes (square, rectangular,
circular), sizes and positions of openings with respect to the boundaries of the shell.
All tests were of high quality with procedures reproducing all the parameters, like
the initial geometrical imperfections. In fact, it is important to know to what extent
the effect persists in the case of shells with openings. The present paper gives a
clear answer to that question.
In parallel to the physical testing, an extensive parametric numerical study was
performed, in order to develop the know-how for such a complex case, taking into
account the relative influences of all the parameters.
Furthermore, this study gives a guide on developing the design rules.
2. Experimental methods
2.1. Definitions of shells
The notation used is defined in Fig. 1. The upper and lower cross-sections (A and
B) were assumed to remain plane and refrained from warping and/or ovalisation.
The upper cross-section was free to translate and rotate around the axes of the
section, while the lower cross-section was fixed. The loading was applied at the
centre of the upper cross-section by means of a displacement uz.
In the circumferential direction, the opening was defined by the central angle ,
or the curvilinear length 2c r or by the dimensionless length r
r
c
rt
Fig. 1.
189
In the axial direction, the height of square and rectangular cut-outs was defined
by h0. The distance from the lower edge of the opening to the lower cross-section
B of the shell was denoted by hb.
hb f
l h0
2
The experimental study was limited to relatively short shells with approximately
/r 2, with an aspect ratio of r/t 280, diameter 2r 99 mm, thickness t
0.175 mm and length 104 mm.
Different types of square, rectangular and circular openings were made, as shown
in Table 1. Characteristic dimensions of openings and their positions are defined for
the different cases studied (cases 2 to 7), and for comparison the case of a shell
without a cut-out (case 1).
190
Table 1
Characteristic dimensions of openings and their positions
Case 1
Case 2
2c
(mm)
r
(degree)
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Without opening
Dimensions of centrally positioned square opening
Fixed parameter h0 = 2c Variable parameter 2c
8.64
17.28
25.92 38.88
1.47
10
2.94
20
4.40
30
6.61
45
51.84
8.81
60
191
w
(n) 0.9.
t
There were no imperfections in the meridional direction (m 0) except along the
welded generator which shows two half waves (m 2) with an amplitude
w
2w(m) 2 98 m
(m) 0.56 (Fig. 2).
t
Fig. 2.
192
Fig. 3.
Compression of load-deflection curves for cases 1 and 2 showing the effect of hole size.
These observations are visualised in Fig. 4, which shows radial displacements for
two types of square openings at 50 and 80% of the local buckling, at the first local
buckling and finally at the collapse buckling.
A square cut-out in a cylindrical shell subjected to axial compression reduces the
first local buckling load and the global collapse buckling load as compared to the
reference shell without a hole. The drop of critical loads with the dimensionless
geometrical parameter of the opening r is described by a linear function in the studied
range 1.47 r 8.81. The ratio between these two critical loads is a function of
r, with a mean value of approximately 1.1 (Fig. 5). Beyond the point of approximately r 10, the first local buckling does not develop.
For chosen dimensions of the square cut-out r 4.40 the position of the opening
along the meridional direction (axis of a cylinder) with respect to cross-sections A
or B does not change the critical load. This interesting result indicates that the critical
load is not linked to the direct distribution of stresses above or below the hole. The
above conclusion is valid as long as cross-sections A and B remain plane but could
rotate. In practice, this boundary condition could be satisfied by placing reinforcing
rings of sufficient rigidity at these cross-sections, Fig. 5.
Multiple and equidistanced openings over the circumferential direction produce a
similar type of instability (first local buckling followed by collapse buckling) with
a corresponding loss of rigidity. In the case of multiple openings the reduction in
the critical load is smaller when the comparison is made taking the sum of the
opening angle, as shown in Fig. 6. Because of symmetry, the appearance of critical
loads is not accompanied by the development of internal bending. The above
dependence can be converted to a different co-ordinate system in which the abscissa
193
Fig. 4. Evolution of buckling forms (prebuckling, local buckling (LB), global buckling (CB). White
represents peaks and blue represents valleys as viewed from inside.
is not the sum of openings but the width of a single opening. It is interesting to note
that in the above co-ordinate system, the first local buckling load is the same for a
shell with single and multiple openings.
194
Fig. 5. Reduction of critical loads with an opening angle, showing weak effect of the height and position
of a hole in the meridional direction.
Fig. 6.
Reduction of the first local buckling load with the size and number of openings (cases 2 and 6).
195
Fig. 7. Dimensionless critical load versus and opening angle for square and circular holes. Note that there
is no local buckling for a circular opening and a generalised buckling load is the same for both shapes.
196
The above experimental results are confirmed by finite element calculations. The
calculations were run using the three-dimensional code CASTEM 2000, developed
by the French Atomic Energy Commission. The code is capable of dealing with
various types of singularities. Half of the shell was modelled by 3500 triangular
elements DKT (three displacements and three rotations per node), as shown in Fig.
8. Contrary to previous analysis on buckling of shells, linear analysis (LA) was found
to give a smaller critical load than geometrically non-linear analysis (GNA), as
shown in Fig. 9. This can be explained by an inability of the geometrically linear
model to account for large radial displacements around the opening.
In fact, already at 20% of the critical load, radial displacements exceed by approximately two times the displacements predicted by linear theory. Further refinement
of the model by introducing the non-linear material behaviour (GMNA) brings the
level of stresses even lower.
The result of the linear (LA) and non-linear (GMNA) analyses mentioned above
corresponds to loading case (a) when the cross-sections A and B remain parallel.
This condition does not fully reflect reality because a single opening produces an
asymmetry and so-called internal bending. At the same time, the results of calculations with geometrical and material non-linearities referred to in Fig. 9 as case (b)
correspond to the boundary condition in which cross-section A is free to displace
and rotate in all three directions.
It should be noted that for design purposes one has to consider rather conservatively only the first critical buckling load, even though there could be a stable postcritical range until collapse buckling occurs. Remember that for circular holes there
is no first local buckling. Therefore the design should be made on the basis of global
collapse buckling.
Fig. 8.
Finite element mesh of a cylinder with an opening (3500 elements for one half of the shell).
197
Fig. 9. Finite element results for two types of boundary and loading conditions (a) and (b) and linear
(LA) and non-linear (GNA and GMNA) formulations.
198
Fig. 10.
Effect of dimensionless length /r on critical buckling load (numerical study GMNA (b)).
Fig. 11. Comparison of INSA tests with earlier results by Starnes [2].
the parameter r. The range of interest corresponds to angular openings larger than
a limiting value denoted by r.
In the first approximation, the geometrical imperfections are seen not to have any
significant effect compared with the effect of opening beyond the critical limit r.
It is possible to identify a reduction function for a given opening over the range
r > r. From Fig. 11 it transpires that for small openings up to this limiting value,
199
the effect of imperfections must be coupled with that of the cut-out. At the same
time, for very small openings, their size is not important compared with a significant
imperfection sensitivity of cylinders subjected to compressive loads.
As shown in Fig. 12 a comparison between calculations and experimental results
is in full agreement.
The obtained results are limited to the aperture size r 6.61 (i.e.
45) and 212 r/t 400. These limits could be extended in the continuation of
this research.
In Fig. 12, the limits of two distinct zones are clearly identified. In the case of
small openings, it is necessary to include in the analysis a coupling between the
geometrical imperfection and presence of an opening. In the range of moderately
large openings, the existence of geometrical imperfections of any size can be neglected.
A careful examination of post-critical geometry for all cases considered indicates
that the modal geometry is not effected by the presence of openings. This statement
is valid for different dimensions and shapes of shells tested. One can conclude that
the mode numbers n and m are invariants, because they depend on the geometry
of a shell rather than that of an opening.
It should be recalled that the critical load has an asymptote with increasing amplitude of imperfections. It is important to note that the dependence of the critical load
on the hole size has a similar form as the known imperfection sensitivity. There
Fig. 12. Comparison between experimental results and numerical calculations for perfect (GMNA) and
imperfect (GMNIA) shells. Note the existence of two ranges. For small r there is a coupling between
geometrical imperfection and hole size. For medium opening, there is no coupling.
200
the reduction factor reaches a maximum (asymptotic) value where the opening size
corresponds to the half-length of the buckling wave [7,8]. It is shown in Fig. 12 that
geometrical imperfections no longer have any effect on cr for r > 2.94, i.e. for an
opening equal or larger than the half-wave of the Yoshimura pattern.
4.4. Principle of the proposed rule
The proposed rule uses a reduction (knock-down) factor to the critical Donnell
stress cr in the same way as is done for a cylindrical shell without an opening. This
rule is developed for the most unfavourable case, i.e. for cut-outs with sharp corners
(squares, rectangles). For the purpose of evolving a European rule [9], the same
notation is used for the reduction factor , as in the classical buckling analysis of
imperfect shells. The reduction factor is a linear piece-wise function of the geometrical parameter of the openings r, (Fig. 13). In the design rule it is proposed that
three distinct regimes be distinguished, denoted respectively by (1), (2) and (3).
Regime (1) corresponds to very small openings in which the size of the hole has
practically no effect on the critical load. The shell response is dominated by the
geometrical imperfections. The reduction factor is constant with respect to the opening parameter r, and its magnitude is equal to the reduction factor of an imperfect
cylinder without an opening subjected to axial compression.
Responses of shells with relatively large openings are dominated by the presence
of cut-outs rather than geometrical imperfections. This function is described by a
linear dependency given by segment (3) in Fig. 13. For intermediate hole sizes there
is a strong coupling effect between the opening parameter r and geometrical imper-
201
fections. The reduction factor in this range is approximated by a straight line, designated in Fig. 13 as segment (2).
In order to define the position of the above three lines on the r plane it is
necessary to identify six parameters.
5. Conclusion
The above experimental and numerical work leads to the following conclusions,
while enhancing the European rules relating to shell buckling.
The opening parameter r characterizes the effect of a hole on the critical load of
a cylindrical shell with an opening under axial compression;
The behaviour shows two large zones:
for small openings in which there is a coupling between the geometrical imperfection and the presence of an opening;
for a moderately larger opening the existence of geometrical imperfections of any
size can be neglected;
The limit between these two zones is defined by an opening angle equivalent to
the length of the half-wave of the shell without any opening;
The critical mode is independent of an opening;
For a moderately larger opening the reduction of critical load is linear with the
angle of the opening;
The height and the position of the hole have little influence;
The linear bifurcation theory underestimates the carrying capacity because it predicts buckling of the vertical edge of the cut-out.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the CECA-ECSC, which has supported this research
(contract no. 7210-SA/208, part E Enhancement of ECCS design recommendation
and development of Eurocode 3, parts related to shell buckling).
References
[1] Tennyson RC. The effect of unreinforced circular cutouts on the buckling of circular cylindrical shells
under axial compression. Journal of Engineering for Industry 1968;November:5416.
[2] Starnes JH. The effects of cutouts on the buckling of thin shells. In: Fung YC, Sechler EE, editors.
Thin shell structures. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1974:289304.
[3] Toda S. Buckling of cylinders with cutouts under axial compression. Journal of Experimental Mechanics 1983;3:4147.
[4] Knodel P, Schulz U. Stabilite de cheminees dacier a` ouvertures dans les tuyaux. Stahlbau (Der)
1988;57(1):1321.
202
[5] Almroth BO, Holmes AM. Buckling of shells with cutouts. Experimental and analysis. Journal of
Solids Structures 1972;8:1057566.
[6] Samuelson AL, Eggwertz S. Shell stability handbook. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1992:278
pp.
[7] Jullien JF, Limam A. Effect of openings on the buckling of cylindrical shells subjected to axial
compression. International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, Hong Kong, 1114
December 1996.
[8] Al Sarraj M. Effets des ouvertures sur la stabilite des coques cylindriques minces soumises a` compression axiale. These de Doctorat, INSA de Lyon (France), 5 Octobre 1995:260 pp.
[9] ECCS/TWG8.4 Buckling of steel shells. European recommendations, 4th edn, no. 56, 1988.