You are on page 1of 4

Toolbox talk 6: Supervisors instructions

ASSET
INTEGRITY

Locked Open / Locked Closed Valves

This toolbox talk is designed to:


Help your team understand the significance of a locked valve
and why it is locked
Inform your team of the importance of following procedure
when changing the position of a locked valve
Identify likely areas where locked valves might be
encountered on a facility
Carry out this toolbox talk before commencing a new
task/job involving a change in status of a Locked Open
or Locked Closed valve.

It is best to complete this talk in small groups maximum ten


people. Additional information and training may be required at
the discretion of local management.
1) Give a copy of the Group Sheet to your group.
2) Using the flow chart given below discuss the process that
must be followed to change (and reinstate) the status of a
locked open / locked closed valve. Ask the Group to identify
who is the responsible person for each of the stages in the
process by marking or colouring the boxes as applicable.
3) Ask the Group to study the diagrams on the Group Sheet
showing the various classifications of LO/LC valve types.
Ask the Group to identify the hazard that might arise if
they move the valve from its status designated in the LO/LC
Register without applying suitable controls or mitigation.
4) Use the diagrams on the Group Sheet to discuss the
mitigations/controls that should be put in place prior to
moving the position of the LO/LC valves in each case.
5) At the end of the Toolbox Talk, provide the Group with their
own copy of the Supervisors Sheet for them to keep as a
reference; Know the Process, Know the controls.
6) Ask what the team should do if they become aware of any
improperly locked valves or broken locks (first step would
be to report them to their supervisor).

MAJOR HAZARDS AWARENESS

LO/LC valves Flow chart of approval process

Start
Request approval to
change valve status

Confirm
classification

Identify Mitigation
and controls needed

Authorise and sign


LOLC register and
issue keys

Apply Mitigation
and Controls

Remote PA confirms
to Authorising
Authority controls
in place

Complete Task
Part of Isolation
Certificate

Yes

Update tags with


status change

Move valve

No
Approve
de-isolation

Part of Isolation
Certificate

Yes
Return valve to
normal position

Update tags with


status change

Remote PA confirms to Authorising


Authority Valve returned to normal
position and tags updated

Key
Performing
Authority

No

Authorising
Person

Apply Isolation TAG


to valve

Sign LOLC register


activities complete
-valve returned to
normal status

Toolbox talk 6: Supervisors instructions

Answers
1

PSV

LC

Vent/ flare/ LP system

Flare/Vent
LO

LO

Spec
Break
Spec
Break

LO
PCV

LC

NC
Blow down valve

LO

LO
LCV

Spec
Break
LO

Type A 1 & 2 Single PSV with


Isolation Valves

Hazard: There is a risk of loss of containment


if an over pressure event occurs and the PSV is
isolated from the system under pressure.
Mitigation: The system being protected should
be isolated and depressured before changing
from LO to LC.

Hazard: If the BDV is isolated when the


system is pressurised it will not be possible
to depressurise the system in an emergency.
This could lead to overpressure and loss of
containment in a fire event.
Mitigation: The system being protected should
be isolated and depressurised before changing
from LO to LC.

Vent/ flare/ LP system


LO

Type A 3 Blow down valve with


Isolation Valve(s)

Atmospheric
Vent

Air/
Hydraulics

LO

LC

LO

LO

HIPS / ESD
Trip function
transmitter
LO

LO

LO

Hazard: If a LC manual valve is opened when


the system is pressurised there is a risk of loss of
containment and uncontrolled discharge of gas,
hydrocarbons or toxic fluids.
Mitigation: The system to be depressurised /
drained should be isolated from the pressure
source before changing from LC to LO.

Mitigation: The system being protected should


be isolated and depressured before changing
from LO to LC.

To Vent/Flare Stack

LoLo/ Hi Hi
Level trips
LT
Corrosion
monitoring

Vent/Flare Header

Pilot gas
supply
LO

LO
Fiscal/critical
metering &,
Analysers

Hazard: If the PCV/LCV is isolated when the


system is pressurised there is a risk of loss
of containment if an over pressure / overfill
event occurs.

To Flare Pilot

Source of
pressure/fluids

Type A 5 Manual isolation from


vent, atmosphere or drains

Type A 4 Pressure/ Level Control


Valve with Isolation Valve(s) and
atmospheric vent

LO

PT

ESDV

LP system/
drains

LP system/
drains

6
LoLo/ Hi Hi
Pressure trips

LC

Atmospheric
Vent

Vent/Flare
KO Drum

Purge Gas
supply into
vent/flare
header

LO

LO

Type B Control of Safety Critical


Instruments and High Integrity
Protection Devices (HIPS)

Hazard: If manual valves are closed safety


critical devices will not function.
Mitigation: Over-ride process to be used with
risk assessment. The downstream primary SCE
to be fully functional keeping at least 1 barrier
in place.

Type C 1 Protection against


ingress of air/ gas into a system/
Equipment / flare purge systems

Hazard: If purge valves are closed there is a risk


that air will enter the vent allowing an explosive
atmosphere to develop inside the vent system
with a risk of internal explosion. If the pilot gas
valves are closed there is a risk of flare flame-out
resulting in (potentially toxic) process streams
being vented to atmosphere.
Mitigation: If no pilot gas; facility shutdown or
alternative flare ignition method in place. If no
purge gas; facility shutdown if no alternative
purge system available.

MAJOR HAZARDS AWARENESS

Toolbox talk 6: Supervisors instructions

Answers
7

ESD

LC

LCV/ PCV
LO

Pressurised
instrument
cabinet

LC

Plant/
Equipment

LC

LC

LC

Spec
Break

Air or Inert
Purge gas

LO

Spec
Break

Spec
Break
LC
LC

Type C 2 Protection against


ingress of gas into a Pressurised
instrument cabinets

Type D 1, 2 Protection of
Downstream Facilities against
adverse conditions

Hazard: If purge valves are closed and


flammable gas enters the cabinet there is a
risk of an internal explosion in the cabinet.

Hazard: Loss of control of volumes/pressure


can occur when by-passes/ start up lines are
left open.

Mitigation: Gas checks negative, power isolated,


Facility should be shutdown if no alternative
purge system is available and the instrument
cabinet is in a classified area.

Mitigation: Adherence to procedure and


isolation standards. (does not apply to
automatic start up facilities and by passes
controlled by PLC).

LT Spec

HT Spec

HT Spec

LT Spec

LO

Type D 3, 4, 6 Protection of
downstream facilities against
adverse conditions

Hazard: Open by passes have the potential


to increase flow / pressure on downstream
equipment and lead to loss of containment.
Exposure of downstream systems to
temperature extremes may cause low
temperature embrittlement, or weakened
material due to high temperatures.
Mitigation: Correct engineering design.
Specified Safe Operating Envelope limits.
Compliance with procedures. Valves should only
be opened when temperatures have normalised.

10

PSV

PSV

11

12
Non-Nace piping

LO

LO

Nace piping

INTERLOCK
LO

LC

LC

Spec
Break
Chemical
Storage

High H2S
Stream

FT
LO

LO

PT

LO

LO
Off Spec fluid

Type D 5 Protection against


adverse downstream conditions
dual PSVs

Hazard: There is a risk of loss of containment if


an over pressure event occurs and both PSVs are
isolated from the system under pressure.
Mitigation: Interlock procedure used to ensure
one PSV is on line at all times.

LC

Type E 1, 2 Isolation valves


preventing off spec fluids
reaching downstream facilities

Hazard: Open valves would allow high H2S stream


to enter a non-Nace spec piping/ equipment
with potential for failure of equipment. Open
valves would allow off-spec fluid to mix with
on-spec fluids with potential for scale formation,
napthenates or off-spec product.
Mitigation: There are no circumstances where high
H2S should be allowed to enter non-Nace facilities.
Specified Safe Operating Envelope limits should
be applied. Off-spec fluid should only be allowed
to mix with on-spec fluids where appropriate
procedures and mitigations are in place.

LO

Type E 3 Protection of
Downstream Facilities Protected
by Chemical Injection

Hazard: Loss of protective chemicals


(e.g. corrosion inhibitor) can lead to
adverse downstream conditions and a
risk of loss of integrity.
Mitigation: Adherence to procedure and
isolation standards. Apply Management of
Change (MOC) procedures if changes required.

MAJOR HAZARDS AWARENESS

You might also like