Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cu crystallites dispersed on different forms of carbon, i.e., activated carbon, graphitized carbon fibers, and diamond, were prepared and characterized by CO chemisorption, N2O decomposition,
X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, temperatureprogrammed reduction, and diffuse reflectance Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS). Both surface and bulk properties
of these carbons had an impact on the dispersion as well as the reducibility of Cu. Increasing the concentration of oxygen-containing
groups on the surface of the activated carbon by a nitric acid treatment prior to Cu impregnation was beneficial in terms of rendering
a higher dispersion of Cu; however, Cu was better stabilized in the
higher oxidation states over a high-temperature-treated activated
carbon. A higher dispersion of Cu was obtained with the diamond
support compared with the graphitized fibers when prepared via
a wet impregnation technique, and it is attributed to the stabilization of Cu through interactive dangling bonds on the diamond
surface. Cu dispersed by an ion-exchange method was stabilized on
the graphitized fibers in two morphologically different forms: aggregates of globular particles deposited on top of graphitic basal planes
and smaller crystallites at the edges of and at defects within these
planes. These morphological differences changed the reducibility of
these particles and also may have altered the electronic properties
of these crystallites. c 1999 Academic Press
INTRODUCTION
131
0021-9517/99 $30.00
c 1999 by Academic Press
Copyright
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
132
which have been extensively used for industrial hydrogenation reactions (56). Consequently, Cu crystallites dispersed
on different forms of carbon, i.e., activated carbon, graphitized carbon fibers, and diamond, were prepared and characterized, the effect of different surface and bulk properties
of the carbons on properties of the resulting Cu catalysts
was examined, and the catalytic behavior of these catalysts in crotonaldehyde hydrogenation was studied after
different reduction pretreatments. A detailed characterization of the pure carbon supports used in this study has
been presented elsewhere (57). This paper describes the
characterization of Cu supported on these carbons by CO
chemisorption, oxygen chemisorption via N2O decomposition, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy,
and temperature-programmed reduction. In addition, diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was employed to probe the chemical
state of surface Cu sites using subambient CO adsorption
to identify oxidation states. The consequent effect on the
kinetics of crotonaldehyde hydrogenation are described in
a following paper (58).
EXPERIMENTAL
Carbon Supports
The activated carbon used in this study was obtained from
Norit Corp (Norit A8933), designated AC-ASIS, and it had
a specified surface area of 800 m2/g. This sample was subjected to two different pretreatments to modify its surface
chemistry (59, 60). A high-temperature treatment (HTT)
under flowing H2 for 6 h at 1223 K was used to remove oxygen and any sulfur impurities from the carbon surface. This
sample, labeled AC-HTT-H2, was stored in a N2-purged
glove box. The third sample, AC-HNO3, was prepared by
heating AC-ASIS in 12 N nitric acid for 12 h at 363 K, washing and filtering with water to achieve a pH of 7, and then
drying overnight at 393 K. The highly graphitic carbon fibers
(GF) used in this study were pitch-based commercial fibers
(P-25, Amoco Performance Products). The fibers were cut
and manually ground to yield a fine powder with a BET surface area of 6 m2/g. The synthetic diamond powder (DM)
was obtained from Alfa Aesar and had a BET surface area
of 25 m2/g.
Catalyst Preparation
A standard wet impregnation technique (WI) was used
to prepare approximately 5 wt% Cu catalysts with all
three activated carbons, the graphitized fibers, and the diamond powder. After impregnation with an aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2, using deionized doubly distilled water, all five catalysts, i.e., Cu/AC-ASIS, Cu/AC-HTT-H2,
Cu/AC-HNO3, Cu/DM, and Cu/GF-WI, were dried in an
oven overnight at 393 K. In addition, a 1.8 wt% Cu/GF sam-
133
Chemisorption
A typical set of isotherms for CO adsorption is shown
in Fig. 1 for the Cu/DM catalyst; others are provided
elsewhere (62). Table 1 lists the corresponding total and
irreversible CO uptakes at 100 Torr on the six catalysts
after pretreatment at different temperatures. For the
Cu/AC-HNO3 catalyst, increasing the reduction temperature from 423 to 573 K resulted in a decrease in both the
total and reversible uptakes. However, for Cu/AC-HTT-H2,
both total and irreversible uptakes increased following
an increase in the reduction temperature. In the case of
Cu/DM, both the total and irreversible uptakes passed
134
TABLE 1
CO Uptakes, Apparent Cu Dispersions, and Cu Particle Sizes
CO uptake (mol/g)a
Tred
(K)
Total
4.8% Cu/AC-HNO3
423
473
573
4.6% Cu/AC-ASIS
dcrys (nm)
Irreversible
COT/CuT
COIrr/CuT
(Cu1+
s /CuT )
183
163
140
52
25
10
0.24
0.22
0.19
0.069
0.033
0.013
4.6
5.4
6.2
19
35
88
423
573
142
130
89
26
0.20
0.18
0.12
0.036
6.2
7.0
10
34
4.9% Cu/AC-HTT-H2
423
573
96
102
22
20
0.12
0.13
0.029
0.026
9.4
8.6
41
45
5.1% Cu/DM
423
473
573
673
67
74
84
60
55
45
35
10
0.083
0.092
0.11
0.076
0.069
0.057
0.044
0.012
13.2
12
11
15
16
20
26
91
5.1% Cu/GF-WI
423
473
573
673
10
10
9
10
5
7
6
5
0.013
0.013
0.012
0.013
0.0065
0.009
0.0077
0.0065
88
88
98
88
1.8% Cu/GF-IE
423
473
573
673
122
141
113
68
25
0
0
0
0.44
0.49
0.39
0.24
0.082
0
0
0
2.7
2.3
2.9
4.7
13
Cu Powdere
Catalyst
9.6
d1 b,c
d2 b,d
176
126
147
176
At 100 Torr.
d (nm) = 1.2 (CO/Cu).
c
Based on total CO uptake.
d
Based on irreversible CO uptake.
e
Cleaned in H2 at 573 K for 1 h.
f
No measurable uptake.
b
through a maximum as the reduction temperature was increased from 423 to 673 K. In comparison, both the total and
the irreversible CO uptakes were low on Cu/GF-WI and did
not vary much as a function of reduction temperature. In
contrast, large total uptakes were obtained on the Cu/GFIE catalyst, although no irreversible uptake was detected
after reduction above 473 K. Using a 1 : 1 stoichiometry for
COads : Cus, where Cus represents a surface Cu atom (67),
Cu dispersions were estimated based on both the total and
irreversible CO uptakes and are reported in Table 1. It
should be noted here that the reversible uptake per gram
of catalyst was always higher than the reversible uptake on
the pure support, which was subtracted from the uptake
to provide the total uptake values in Table 1. Based on the
rationale discussed earlier (67), the irreversible adsorption
at 300 K can be associated with the stabilization of CO on
Cu+ sites, while the difference in the reversible uptakes
on the pretreated catalysts and the respective supports can
be attributed to weak reversible adsorption of CO on surface Cu0 and residual Cu2+ species. The dispersion based
on the total CO uptake on each catalyst, after correcting for
the reversible uptake on the pure support, could provide
TABLE 2
Oxygen Adsorption via N2O Decomposition
on Cu Catalysts at 363 K
Tred
(K)
O uptake
(mol/g)
Cu /CuT
dcrys a
(nm)
4.8% Cu/AC-HNO3
423
473
573
110
77
56
0.280
0.20
0.15
4.0
5.7
7.4
4.6% Cu/AC-ASIS
423
573
0
55
0
0.15
7.4
4.9% Cu/AC-HTT-H2
423
573
0
42
0
0.11
10.5
5.0% Cu/DM
423
473
573
673
0
19
25
35
0
0.048
0.064
0.09
23
18
13
5.1% Cu/GF-WI
423
473
573
673
1.8% Cu/GF-IE
423
473
573
673
41
55
64
31
6
0.29
0.39
0.45
0.22
3.7
2.8
2.4
5.0
Catalyst
Cu powderb
a
b
135
in Table 2. Once again, the Cu0 dispersions were dependent on both the support and the reduction temperature.
The highest dispersion with any activated carbon was obtained for Cu/AC-HNO3 reduced at 423 K. In contrast, the
Cu/AC-HTT-H2 showed no O uptake after reduction at
423 K, although a significant uptake was observed after reduction at 573 K. For the Cu/AC-ASIS catalyst, the uptake
after reduction at 423 K was also nil, but after reduction at
573 K it was similar to that for Cu/AC-HNO3 and higher
than that for Cu/AC-HTT-H2. In the case of Cu/DM, no significant change in the uptake was observed when reduced
at or above 473 K, and the dispersions were lower than
those obtained with any of the AC catalysts. No O uptake
was detected on the Cu/GF-WI catalyst after any pretreatment, presumably because the dispersion was so low that
any weight gain was within the sensitivity of the gravimetric apparatus used for the measurement. In contrast, with
Cu/GF-IE, significant uptakes were observed that did not
vary significantly with reduction temperatures of 473 K and
above. Exposure of the pure supports to N2O showed no
significant uptakes, indicating that the increase in weight
of the catalysts was due to the reaction of N2O with surface Cu0 species. The measurement of Cu0 surface atoms
by N2O decomposition, therefore, should be more accurate
than that obtained from the reversible CO uptake, which
involved correction for uptake on the support as well as uncertain adsorption stoichiometries. However, as discussed
FIG. 2. Increase in weight during O chemisorption via N2O decomposition at 363 K over (A) Cu/AC-HNO3 reduced at 423 K and (B) pure
AC-HNO3 after treatment in H2 at 423 K.
136
FIG. 3. XRD patterns for Cu/AC-HNO3 after (A) He treatment at 423 K, (B) reduction at 423 K, and (C) reduction at 573 K.
X-ray Diffraction
The XRD patterns for Cu/AC-HNO3 and Cu/GF-IE after pretreatment at different temperatures, shown respectively in Figs. 3 and 4, are typical and others are provided
FIG. 4. XRD patterns for Cu/GF-WI after (A) He treatment at 423 K, (B) reduction at 423 K, (C) reduction at 573 K, and (D) reduction at 673 K.
137
TABLE 3
Average Cu Crystallite Sizes (nm) from Adsorption, XRD, and TEM Methods
Catalyst
Tred
(K)
Adsorption
(COIrr + 2Oad)/CuT
XRD
dsurf
Cu2O
TEM
Cu
dnum
dsurf
5.6
6.4
dvol
4.8% Cu/AC-HNO3
423
473
573
0.36
0.24
0.16
3.2
4.9
7.2
1.3
1.1
2.9
4.9
4.6% Cu/AC-ASIS
423
573
0.12
0.19
6.2
7.5
9.2
6.8
5.8
7.0
10
11
4.9% Cu/AC-HTT-H2
423
573
0.03
0.13
9.2
8.5
11
10
9.8
23
14
29
36
5.0% Cu/DM
423
473
573
673
0.07
0.11
0.11
0.10
12
13
9
13
13
12
17
14
18
13
10
15
13
19
23
423
473
573
673
0.012a
0.012a
0.011a
0.012a
88a
88a
98a
88a
19
21
51
78
100
94
136
154
423
473
573
673
0.31
0.42
0.48
0.25
30
81
100
5.1% Cu/GF-WI
1.8% Cu/GF-IE
2.9
2.8
2.4
5.0
1.5
39
48
6.7
elsewhere (62). The peaks corresponding to the carbon supports have been analyzed elsewhere (57). Depending on the
reduction temperature, broad peaks of varying intensities
at 35.3 , 36.5 , and 42.9 , corresponding to the primary reflections of the CuO, Cu2O, and Cu0 phases, are seen in
these spectra. As the reduction temperature is increased
from 423 K, gradual changes occur in the peak intensities that are indicative of a progressive transition of the
Cu oxidation state. The corresponding Cu crystallite sizes,
based on both cuprous oxide and metallic Cu, are listed in
Table 3.
Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy
Representative transmission electron micrographs for
Cu/AC-HNO3 and Cu/DM reduced at 573 K are shown
in Figs. 5A and 6A, and the corresponding Cu particle size
distributions based on approximately 120150 particles for
each are shown in Figs. 5B and 6B. Those for other catalysts are provided
(62). The number-average diP elsewhere
P
n i di / P
n i , surface area-weighted average
ameter, dn = P
n i di3P
/ n i di2P
, and volume-weighted avdiameter, ds =
n i di4 / n i di3 , of the Cu particles
erage diameter, dv =
in each catalyst after a given pretreatment are listed in
Table 3. Fairly narrow Cu particle size distributions were
obtained with any of the three activated carbon supports
after reduction at 573 K. The smallest Cu particles were
observed on the AC-HNO3 support, whereas the largest
were seen on AC-HTT-H2, thus suggesting a favorable in-
fluence of the oxygen-containing surface groups on the dispersion and sintering resistance of the supported Cu particles. In the case of Cu/DM, a wider distribution of particle size was seen, although the average particle sizes were
comparable to those on AC-HTT-H2. This was surprising
given the huge difference in BET surface areas between the
two supports, and it suggests a role of interactive stabilizing forces between the precursor and the support surface
(40).
Because of the nature and texture of the graphitized carbon fibers used, instrumental limitations prevented the observation of any discernible features in the transmission
electron micrographs of these Cu/GF catalysts. Only features present at the edges of the fiber fragments could
be observed; consequently, the samples were also examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Representative transmission electron micrographs of the Cu/GF-WI
and Cu/GF-IE catalysts reduced at 573 K are shown in
Fig. 7, while corresponding scanning electron micrographs
of these two samples are provided elsewhere (62). The combined particle size distributions for these samples, based on
both the SEM and TEM image analyses, are shown in Fig. 8.
As seen in Fig. 8A, a broad distribution of much larger Cu
particles occurred in Cu/GF-WI, with sizes ranging from
30 to 240 nm, whereas in Cu/GF-IE, a bimodal Cu particle size distribution existed, with maxima around 5 and
45 nm. With the latter catalyst, the larger particles were
observed in the SEM images and could be attributed to excess Cu deposited on the graphitic basal planes during the
138
FIG. 5. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of Cu/AC-HNO3 after a 573 K reduction. (B) Corresponding Cu particle size distribution.
139
FIG. 6. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of Cu/DM after a 573 K reduction. (B) Corresponding Cu particle size distribution.
140
FIG. 7. Transmission electron micrographs of (A) Cu/GF-WI and (B) Cu/GF-IE after a 573 K reduction.
DRIFTS
The FTIR spectra of the three AC-supported catalysts
prior to any pretreatment are shown in Fig. 9. The reference
spectra used here are those of the corresponding untreated
pure supports (diluted with CaF2). The bands in these spectra therefore essentially represent the nature of the impregnated Cu species. The spectrum of Cu/AC-HNO3 exhibits
broad overlapping bands in the region between 1200 and
1800 cm1, with peaks at 1285, 1355, 1419, 1596, 1669, and
1740 cm1, along with weaker absorbance bands at 967,
2029, and 2918 cm1. In addition, a significant drop in the
absorbance intensity is seen around 31003500 cm1. As
mentioned earlier, since the reference spectrum in this case
is that of pure AC-HNO3, this drop in intensity would imply a loss of surface functional groups present on the original carbon after interaction with Cu precursor solution.
The spectrum of the Cu/AC-ASIS shows fewer absorption
bands in the same region, i.e., at 960, 1245, 1355, 1419, and
1582 cm1. The spectrum of the Cu/AC-HTT-H2 is simi-
141
142
FIG. 9. DRIFT spectra of untreated Cu/AC catalysts: (A) Cu/AC-HNO3, (B) Cu/AC-ASIS, (C) Cu/AC-HTT-H2. Reference spectra are those of
the corresponding pure carbons.
FIG. 10. DRIFT spectra of Cu/AC-HNO3 (A) before any pretreatment, (B) after reduction at 423 K, and (C) after reduction at 573 K. Reference
spectra are those of the corresponding pretreated pure AC-HNO3.
143
FIG. 11. DRIFT spectra of Cu/DM (A) before any pretreatment, (B) after reduction at 423 K, (C) after reduction at 573 K, and (D) after reduction
at 673 K. Reference spectra are those of the corresponding pretreated DM.
FIG. 12. DRIFT spectra of Cu/GF-IE (A) before any pretreatment, (B) after reduction at 423 K, and (C) after reduction at 573 K. Reference
spectra are those of the corresponding pretreated pure GF.
144
FIG. 13. DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/AC catalysts after reduction at 423 K; Tadsn = 173 K.
FIG. 14. DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/AC catalysts after reduction at 573 K; Tadsn = 173 K.
145
FIG. 15. DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/DM after (A) treatment in Ar at 423 K and reduction at (B) 423 K, (C) 473 K, (D) 573 K, and
(E) 673 K; Tadsn = 173 K.
more intense band at 2108 cm1 remains (Fig. 14). In contrast, the spectrum of Cu/AC-HTT-H2 exhibits a strong absorption peak around 2158 cm1 after the low-temperature
treatment along with a weaker peak at 2126 cm1. After reduction at 573 K, the 2158 cm1 peak disappears while that
near 2122 cm1 intensifies and a new sharp peak appears at
2109 cm1. The spectra for Cu/AC-ASIS exhibit intermediate features compared with those of the other AC catalysts.
The absorption band at 2158 cm1 corresponds to CO adsorption on Cu2+ sites, those from 2122 to 2127 cm1 can be
assigned to CO adsorbed on Cu+ sites, while adsorption at
frequencies of 2110 cm1 and below can be associated with
surface Cu0 sites (6769).
The DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/DM at 173 K
after different pretreatments are shown in Fig. 15. The
spectrum of the catalyst treated in Ar at 423 K for 1 h exhibits a broad band at 2158 cm1 along with another one at
2120 cm1. After reduction at 423 K, the 2120 cm1 peak intensifies and shifts to 2122 cm1 while the 2158 cm1 peak
is reduced significantly. Reduction at 473 K removes the
higher-frequency band and shifts the peak at 2122 cm1 to
2130 cm1. Reduction at 573 K results in a decrease in the
intensity of this latter peak and the appearance of a new
peak at 2110 cm1. Finally, after reduction at 673 K, the
2130 cm1 peak disappears and the 2110 cm1 peak intensifies.
146
FIG. 16. DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/GF-WI after (A) treatment in Ar at 423 K and reduction at (B) 423 K, (C) 573 K, and (D) 673 K;
Tadsn = 173 K.
FIG. 17.
DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on Cu/GF-IE after (A) treatment in Ar at 423 K and reduction at (B) 423 K and (C) 473 K; Tadsn = 173 K.
147
148
149
150
151
TABLE 4
Distribution of Cu Oxidation States in Cu/Carbon Catalysts
Chemisorption
XRD
Tred
( C)
Cu2+
Cu+
Cu0
Cu2+
Cu+
Cu0
Cu2+
Cu+
Cu0
4.8% Cu/AC-HNO3
423
473
573
0
0
0
0.19
0.14
0.08
0.81
0.86
0.92
0
0
0
0.60
0.11
0
0.40
0.89
1.0
0.24
0.11
0.76
0.89
4.6% Cu/AC-ASIS
423
573
0.37
0
0.63
0.19
0
0.81
0.40
0
0.60
0.28
0
0.72
0.22
0
0.31
0.20
0.47
0.80
4.9% Cu/AC-HTT-H2
423
573
0.77
0
0.23
0.19
0
0.81
0.70
0
0.30
0.39
0
0.61
0.36
0
0.30
0.18
0.34
0.82
5.0% Cu/DM
423
473
573
673
0.32
0
0
0
0.68
0.54
0.41
0.13
0
0.46
0.59
0.87
0.15
0
0
0
0.85
0.78
0.38
0
0
0.22
0.62
1.0
0.63
0.19
0
0
0.37
0.31
0.27
0.12
0
0.60
0.73
0.88
5.1% Cu/GF-WI
423
473
573
673
0.5a
0.3a
0
0
0.5a
0.7a
0.66a
0.5a
0a
0a
0.33a
0.5a
0.65
0.32
0
0
0.35
0.68
0.44
0
0
0
0.56
1.0
0
0
0.50
0.36
0
0.50
0.64
1
1.8% Cu/GF-IE
423
473
573
673
0.13
0
0
0
0.21
0
0
0
0.66
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0.24
0
0
0
0.76
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0.05
0
0
0
0.95
1.0
1.0
1.0
Catalyst
152
REFERENCES
1. Radovic, L. R., and Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Chem. Phys. Carbon 25,
243 (1997).
2. Stiles, A. B., Catalyst Supports and Supported Catalysts. Butterworths, Boston, 1987.
3. Cameron, D. S., Cooper, S. J., Dodgson, I. L., Harrison, B., and
Jenkins, J. W., Catal. Today 7, 113 (1990).
4. Radovic, L. R., and Sudhakar, C., in Introduction to Carbon
Technologies (H. Marsh, E. A. Heintz, and F. Rodriguez-Reinoso,
Eds.). Univ. of Alicante Press, Alicante, Spain, 1996.
5. Bird, A. J., in Catalyst Supports and Supported Catalysts (A. B.
Stiles, Ed.). Butterworths, Boston, 1987.
6. Augustine, R. L., Heterogeneous Catalysis for the Synthetic
Chemist. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996.
7. Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., in Porosity in Carbons: Characterization and
Applications (J. W. Patrick, Ed.). Edward Arnold, London, 1995.
8. Ehrburger, P., Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 7, 275 (1984).
9. Juntgen, H., Fuel 65, 1436 (1986).
10. Leon y Leon, C. A., and Radovic, L. R., Chem. Phys. Carbon 24, 213
(1996).
11. Baetzold, R. C., Surf. Sci. 36, 123 (1972).
12. Carley, A. F., Rajumon, M. K., and Roberts, M. W., J. Solid State
Chem. 106, 156 (1993).
13. Jirka, I., Surf. Sci. 232, 307 (1990).
14. De Crescenzi, M., Diociaiuti, M., Lozzi, L., Picozzi, P., Santucci, S.,
Battistoni, C., and Mattogno, G., Surf. Sci. 178, 282 (1986).
15. Srinivasan, R., and Gopalan, P., Surf. Sci. 338, 31 (1995).
16. Noronha, F. B., Schmal, M., Nicot, C., Moraweck, B., and Frety, R.,
J. Catal. 168, 42 (1997).
17. Guerrero Ruiz, A., Lopez Gonzalez, J. D., and Rodriguez Ramos, I.,
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1681 (1984).
18. Phillips, J., Clausen, B., and Dumesic, J. A., J. Phys. Chem. 84, 1814
(1980).
19. Medina, F., Salagre, P., Sueiras, J. E., and Fierro, J. L. G., Appl.
Catal. A 99, 115 (1993).
20. Nedorezova, P. M., Saratovskikh, S. L., Kolbanev, I. V., Tsvetkova, V. I.,
Babkina, O. N., and Dyachkovskii, F. S., Kinet. Catal. 31, 151 (1990).
21. Self, V. A., and Sermon, P. A., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 834
(1990).
153
22. Takasu, Y., Sakuma, T., and Matsuda, Y., Chem. Lett., 1179 (1985).
23. Richard, D., and Gallezot, P., in Preparation of Catalysts IV
(B. Delmon, P. Grange, P. A. Jacobs, and G. Poncelet, Eds.), p. 71.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987.
24. Giroir-Fendler, A., Richard, D., and Gallezot, P., in Heterogeneous
Catalysis and Fine Chemicals (M. Guisnet, et al., Eds.), p. 171.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
25. Richard, D., Gallezot, P., Neibecker, D., and Tkatchenko, I., Catal.
Today 6, 171 (1989).
26. Yeung, K. L., and Wolf, E. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 798 (1991).
27. Vannice, M. A., and Garten, R. L., J. Catal. 56, 236 (1979).
28. Kuwahara, M., Ogawa, S., and Ichikawa, S., Surf. Sci. 344, L1259
(1995).
29. Fournier, J., Brossard, L., Tilquin, J., Cote, R., Dodelet, J., Guay, D.,
and Menard, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 919 (1996).
30. Imai, J., Suzuki, T., and Kaneko, K., Catal. Lett. 20, 133 (1991).
31. Mahmood, T., Williams, J. O., Miles, R., and McNicol, B. D., J. Catal.
72, 218 (1981).
32. Savoia, D., Trombini, C., and Umani-Ronchi, A., Pure Appl. Chem.
57, 1887 (1985).
33. Baker, R. T. K., Prestridge, E. B., and Garten, R. L., J. Catal. 56, 390
(1979).
34. Atamny, F., Duff, D., and Baiker, A., Catal. Lett. 34, 305 (1995).
35. Lineares-Solano, A., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., de Lecea, C. S. M.,
Mahajan, O. P., and Walker, P. L., Jr., Carbon 20, 177 (1982).
36. Ehrburger, P., Mahajan, O. P., and Walker, P. L., Jr., J. Catal. 43, 61
(1976).
37. Schlogl, R., Bowen, P., Millward, G. R., Jones, W., and Boehm, H. P.,
J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1, 1793 (1983).
38. Parkash, S., Chakrabarttup, S. K., and Hooley, J. G., Carbon 16, 231
(1978).
39. Schlogl, R., in Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis (G. Ertl,
H. Knozinger,
154
61. Kohler, M. A., Lee, J. C., Trimm, D. L., Cant, N. W., and Wainwright,
M. S., Appl. Catal. 31, 309 (1987).
62. Dandekar, A., Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1998.
63. Na, B. K., Walters, A. B., and Vannice, M. A., Appl. Spectrosc. 140,
585 (1993).
64. Chinchen, G. C., Hay, C. M., Vandervell, M. D., and Waugh, K. C.,
J. Catal. 103, 79 (1987).
65. Venter, J. J., and Vannice, M. A., Appl. Spectrosc. 42, 1096 (1988).
66. Fanning, P. E., and Vannice, M. A., Carbon 31, 721 (1993).
67. Dandekar, A., and Vannice, M. A., J. Catal. 178, 621 (1998).
68. Davydov, A. A., Infrared Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Species on the
Surface of Transition Metal Oxides. Wiley, London, 1990.
69. Choi, K. I., and Vannice, M. A., J. Catal. 131, 22 (1991).
70. Park, S. H., McClain, S., Tain, Z. R., Suib, S. L., and Karwacki, C.,
Chem. Mater. 9, 176 (1997).
71. Stoch, J., and Gablankowska-Kukucz, J., Surf. Interface Anal. 17, 165
(1991).
72. Desimoni, E., Casella, G. I., Salvi, A. M., Catadi, T. R. I., and Morone,
A., Carbon 30, 527 (1992).
73. Morra, M., Occhiello, E., and Garbassi, F., Surf. Interface Anal. 16,
412 (1990).
74. Parmigiani, F., Pacchioni, G., Illas, F., and Bagus, P. S., Jr., J. Electron
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 59, 255 (1992).
75. Socrates, G., Infrared Characteristic Group Frequencies. Wiley,
Chichester, 1980.
76. Colthup, N. B., Daly, L. H., and Wiberley, S. E., Introduction of Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, 3rd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
77. Suh, D. J., Park, T., and Ihm, S., Carbon 31, 427 (1993).
78. Morikawa, K., Shirasaki, T., and Okada, M., Adv. Catal. 20, 97
(1969).
79. Ma, J., Rodriquez, N. M., Vannice, M. A., and Baker, R. T. K.,
J. Catal., in press.
80. Prado-Burguete, C., Linares-Solano, A., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., and
Salinas-Martinez De Lecea, C., J. Catal. 115, 98 (1989).
81. Ehrburger, P., Mongilardi, A., and Lahaye, J., J. Colloid Interface Sci.
21, 275 (1984).
82. Coloma, F., Sepulveda-Escribano, A., and Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.,
Appl. Catal. A 123, L1 (1995).
83. Antonucci, P. L., Alderucci, V., Giordano, N., Cocke, D. L., and Kim,
H., J. Appl. Electrochem. 24, 58 (1994).
84. Robertson, S. D., Mcnicol, B. D., de Baas, J. H., and Kloet, S. C.,
J. Catal. 37, 424 (1975).
85. Padley, M. B., Rochester, C. H., Hutchings, G. J., and King, F., J. Catal.
148, 438 (1994).
86. Hadjiivanov, K. I., Kantcheva, M. M., and Klissurski, D. G., J. Chem.
Soc. Faraday Trans. 92, 4595 (1996).
87. Shepotko, M., Davydov, A., and Budneva, A., Kinet. Katal. 35, 612
(1994).
88. Pieplu, T., Poignant, F., Vallet, A., Saussey, J., and Lavalley, J. C., Stud.
Surf. Sci. Catal. 96, 619 (1995).
89. Amores, G. M. G., Sanchez-Escribano, V., Busca, G., and Lorenzelli,
V., J. Mater. Chem. 41, 965 (1994).
90. Yacaman, M. J., and Daminguez, E. J. M., J. Catal. 64, 213
(1980).