Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o
Keywords:
Supplier management
Green purchasing
Sustainability
abstract
Five potential drivers of green supply management performance were identied in the literature
review: green supply management capabilities, the strategic level of the purchasing department, the
level of environmental commitment, the degree of green supplier assessment, and the degree of green
collaboration with suppliers. These constructs were used to form a structural model explaining the
environmental performance and the purchasing performance. The model was analysed with SmartPLS
2.0 using data collected among German purchasers. The results suggest that the degree of green
supplier assessment and the level of green collaboration exert direct inuence on environmental
performance. These two practices are driven by the strategic level of the purchasing department and
the level of environmental commitment of the rm. Whereas commitment inuences green assessment
directly, the impact of commitment on green collaboration is mediated by the capabilities of the
purchasing department. Furthermore, the results show that environmental performance has a positive
impact on purchasing performance.
& 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Protecting the environment is an ethical value in itself. Ethics
establishes moral norms in consideration of the natural environment. Individuals should feel obliged to protect and maintain the
sources of human life. They should have a sense of responsibility
for their actions and the consequences that these actions provoke (Oliveira de Paula and Negra~ o Cavalcanti, 2000, p. 110).
These moral requirements are not only relevant for private
individuals but also for managers acting as representatives of
their companies. Managers have the duty to take into account the
attitudes, values and beliefs of the public regarding environmental protection. Nevertheless, environmental responsibility is not
only an encumbrance to managers. Environmental commitment
could be a source of competitive advantage and sustainable
development of a rm. In summary, environmental performance
is a concern for managers due to reasons ranging from regulatory
and contractual compliance, to public perception and competitive
advantage (Theyel, 2001).
Many rms have realised that customers and other stakeholders do not always distinguish between a single company and
its partners in the supply chain. Also, the lead company in a
Corresponding author. Tel.: 49 711 685 83422; fax: 49 711 685 83594.
E-mail addresses: rudolf.large@bwi.uni-stuttgart.de (R.O. Large),
cristina.gimenez@esade.edu (C. Gimenez Thomsen).
1
Tel.: 34 932 806 162; fax: 34 932 048 105.
1478-4092/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
customers and suppliers and their potential impact on an organisations environmental management. This paper tries to cover
these gaps and focuses on how to extend green practices to
immediate suppliers. The emphasis of this research is on the
greening of suppliercustomer relationships (Green Supply Management), as buying rms are normally in the strategic position to
exert signicant inuence on the environmental behaviour of
their suppliers.
Green Supply Management (GSM) is being adopted by industry, but the extent and mode of implementation vary signicantly
(Rao, 2002). In some instances, it takes the form of questionnaires
or suppliers visits to assess suppliers environmental performance (Noci, 1997). In other cases, companies go for a partnering
and mentoring approach, such as site visits, exchange of personnel, technical assistance, and various other tactics (Lamming and
Hampson, 1996; Handeld et al., 1997; Geffen and Rothenberg,
2000; Zsidisin and Sifert, 2001). Although companies can follow
both approaches simultaneously, few papers have considered the
joint effect of these two different approaches on environmental
performance improvement (see Theyel, 2001; Klassen and
Vachon, 2003; Lee and Klassen, 2008).
Furthermore, only few papers have considered the development process of the preconditions needed to adopt these
approaches of supplier environmental improvement. Bowen
et al. (2001) identied the following potential drivers of green
supply: a more strategic purchasing approach and the supply
capabilities developed by a proactive rms environmental management. There is also a gap in the literature concerning the impact of
environmental performance improvements on purchasing performance. Carter et al. (2000) found evidence for a positive inuence of
environmental purchasing activities on rms nancial performance.
However, from a supply perspective the performance outcome of a
purchasing department (Sanchez-Rodriguez et al., 2005) is more
relevant to evaluate the appropriateness of the assessment and the
collaboration approach than the general nancial performance of
the rm.
Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse the effectiveness of different approaches used to extend sustainable
practices to suppliers. More specically, the research objectives
of this paper are (1) to study the impact of different approaches
(green assessment and green collaboration) on environmental
performance improvement; (2) to analyse the factors that drive or
contribute to the implementation of such efforts; and (3) to
investigate the impact of environmental performance improvement on the performance outcome of a purchasing department.
The structure of the paper is as follows: rst, we provide a
literature review and the conceptual model and related hypotheses. Next, we explain the methodology employed. Then, we
present the results and discuss them. Finally, we highlight the
main conclusions and managerial implications and provide some
directions for future research.
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
of strategic purchasing on supply management practices; however, an indirect effect through supply management capabilities
was identied.
Based on the results of Carr and Pearson (1999) and Lamming
and Hampson (1996) we hypothesise that the higher the strategic
level of purchasing the higher the extent of implementation of
both approaches:
H3. There is a positive relationship between the strategic level of
the purchasing department and the extent of implementation
of the green supplier assessment approach.
H4. There is a positive relationship between the strategic level of
the purchasing department and the extent of implementation of
the collaboration with suppliers approach.
2.4. The environmental commitment of the rm
Antecedent theory proposes that a rms response to the
environmental requirements of its stakeholders is inuenced by
its existing level of environmental commitment (Henriques and
Sadorsky, 1999; Aragon-Correa and Sharma, 2003). Following
Simpson et al. (2007) we measured environmental commitment
through the rms policies, values and employee awareness of
environmental programs.
One of the most cited predictors of the implementation of
green supply is the proactivity of the rms towards environmental management (Bowen et al., 2001). Bowen et al. (2001) found a
positive and direct impact of environmental proactivity on greening the supply process, a construct that shares similarities with
our green supplier assessment approach. Supplier assessment is a
technocratic method based on standardized tools and instruments. If a company usually performs supplier monitoring and
general supplier audits, it would not be challenging to enlarge
these tools to cover environmental issues. Therefore we expect
direct inuence of environmental commitment on green supplier
assessment:
H5. There is a positive relationship between the environmental
commitment of the rm and the implementation of the green
supplier assessment approach.
In comparison to environmental assessment the nature of
collaboration is more focused on human interactions and communications. Therefore, buyers involved in environmental collaboration need specic knowledge and skills in the eld of green
purchasing. Following this basic idea, we anticipate an indirect
relationship between commitment and the collaborative approach.
We expect that environmental commitment leads to the development of green purchasing capabilities which enable the implementation of the collaborative approach. Sharma and Vredenburg
(1998) and Bowen et al. (2001) argue that following a proactive
environmental approach can foster the development of capabilities. Accordingly, we hypothesise that:
H6. There is a direct and positive relationship between the environmental commitment of the rm and purchasing capabilities.
H6.1. There is an indirect and positive impact of the environmental commitment of the rm on the green collaboration with
suppliers approach (mediated by purchasing capabilities).
2.5. Purchasing capabilities
Some studies have analysed the role of purchasing capabilities in
the implementation of green supply (Carter et al., 1998; Bowen et al.,
2001). Capabilities are the internal and external organisational skills,
resources, and functional competences developed within rms to
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
3. Methodology
Strategic
level of
purchasing
H3 +
Green supplier
assessment
Environmental
performance
improvement
Purchasings
environmental
capabilities
H8 +
H6 +
Environmental
commitment
H7 +
Green
collaboration
with suppliers
H10 +
Purchasing
performance
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
this recommendation the sample meets the sample size requirements of PLS. In contrast, AMOS would need about 200 cases
following the recommendations of Bentler and Chou (1987).
3.1. Measurement assessment
Reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis with SPSS
were performed. The evaluation was based on the criteria
provided by Hair et al. (2009). The calculations show sufcient
degrees of reliability (Cronbach Alpha) and convergent validity
(loadings, one-factor solution) after excluding item AS3 (audit)
(Table 1). Only in the case of green collaboration with suppliers
Cronbach Alpha is slightly smaller than the threshold of 0.7.
Nevertheless, we decided not to exclude COL3 because this item
covers an important topic of environmental collaboration.
Finally, SmartPLS was used to evaluate the scales of the model.
Common criteria to evaluate reective measures of PLS path
models are the average variance extracted, the composite reliability and the communality (StoneGeissers Q2) (Chin, 1998). The
results of these calculations are shown in Table 2. The common
quality requirements were met by almost each of the constructs.
Only the average variance extracted of green collaboration with
suppliers (0.56) fails to meet the threshold of 0.6.
4. Results
The path relationships (standardized regression coefcients) of the
model were estimated performing SmartPLS. The bootstrap procedure
(Efron, 1979; Diaconis and Efron, 1983) was used to obtain t-statistics
in order to evaluate the signicance of the parameters. The bootstrap
sample means match with the original sample estimates. Therefore,
bootstrapping is an appropriate method to evaluate the signicance
of the estimators of the proposed model. The results of the parameter
estimation are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 3.
These results provide empirical support for nine of the ten
hypotheses. All regression coefcients are in the predicted direction
and signicant with the exception of the relationship between green
Table 1
Measurement assessment (calculation with SPSS).
Construct
Indicator
Cronbach
alpha 40.7
Loadings
40.7
Variance
explained 450%
Source
POS1
POS2
POS3
EC1
EC2
EC3
CAP1
CAP2
CAP3
AS1
AS2
COL1
COL2
COL3
EF1
EF2
EF3
EF4
EF5
EF6
PERF1
PERF2
PERF3
PERF4
PERF5
0.901
0.874
0.933
0.934
0.947
0.961
0.917
0.920
0.888
0.848
0.922
0.922
0.836
0.820
0.632
0.883
0.896
0.866
0.908
0.890
0.931
0.877
0.787
0.841
0.839
0.853
83.6%
88.7%
78.4%
85.0%
59.0%
80.3%
70.5%
Environmental commitment
Purchasing performance
0.936
0.862
0.804
0.651
0.950
0.892
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
Table 2
Measurement assessment (calculation with SmartPLS).
Scale
POS
EC
CAP
AS
COL
EP
PERF
reective
reective
reective
reective
reective
reective
reective
Average variance
extracted
40.6
Composite
reliability
40.7
StoneGeissers
Q2 (communality)
40
0.83
0.89
0.77
0.85
0.56
0.80
0.71
0.94
0.96
0.91
0.92
0.79
0.96
0.92
0.83
0.89
0.77
0.85
0.56
0.80
0.71
R2 = 0.202
Strategic
level of
purchasing
H3 +
0.273***
Green supplier
assessment
*
**
***
p < 0.1
p < 0.05
p < 0.01
R2 = 0.293
Environmental
performance
improvement
H6 +
0.461***
H8 +
0.406***
Environmental
commitment
Purchasings
environmental
capabilities
H7 +
0.423***
Green
collaboration
with suppliers
Purchasing
performance
H10 +
-0.209*
R2 = 0.365
R2 = 0.299
R2 = 0.212
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
H7
H8
H9
H10
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
pos.
AS ) EP
COL ) EP
POS ) AS
POS ) COL
EC ) AS
EC ) CAP
CAP ) COL
EP ) PERF
AS ) PERF
COL ) PERF
Original
sample (O)
Sample
mean (M)
Standard deviation
(STDEV)
Standard
error (STERR)
Statistics
(9O/STERR9)
Signicance
0.287
0.380
0.273
0.261
0.287
0.461
0.423
0.406
0.396
0.209
0.274
0.395
0.255
0.251
0.291
0.469
0.430
0.417
0.378
0.207
0.115
0.092
0.093
0.103
0.116
0.082
0.081
0.090
0.113
0.113
0.115
0.092
0.093
0.103
0.116
0.082
0.081
0.090
0.113
0.113
2.506
4.143
2.930
2.538
2.475
5.620
5.201
4.531
3.492
1.845
0.012
0.000
0.003
0.011
0.013
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.065
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
5. Discussion
Following Theyel (2001), Klassen and Vachon (2003), and Lee
and Klassen (2008) we developed a conceptual framework which
posited a positive relationship between each approach (green
collaboration and green assessment) and the environmental performance. Our analysis provides empirical support for a direct impact
of the collaborative and assessment approaches on environmental
performance. Theyel (2001) and Klassen and Vachon (2003) only
found a positive effect of assessment on environmental performance. The reason why we may have found a positive impact of
green collaboration on environmental performance can be that
when these two studies were conducted the level of collaboration
with suppliers was considerably lower than the level of adoption of
evaluative practices. In our study, the level of green assessment is
higher than the level of green collaboration but the difference is
marginal. Our results are, however, consistent with the results of a
recent case study: Lee and Klassen (2008) found that the presence of
both monitoring and support-based GSCM provides a synergistic
effect, resulting in a greater rate of development of suppliers
environmental management capabilities.
From Bowen et al. (2001) we incorporated in our framework
some enablers or drivers of these two approaches. Our results
show that the two approaches are driven by the strategic level of
the purchasing department and the level of environmental
commitment of the rm. The positive effect of the strategic level
of purchasing on suppliers assessment and collaboration with
suppliers is consistent with the results of Carr and Pearson (1999)
and Lamming and Hampson (1996). This means that the higher
the participation in the strategic planning process the higher the
implementation of both approaches to improve the rms environmental performance.
Our results show that whereas commitment inuences assessment directly, the impact of environmental commitment on green
collaboration is mediated by the capabilities of the purchasing
department. These results are in accordance with the ndings of
previous studies: First, the direct impact of commitment on green
supplier assessment is consistent with the results of Bowen et al.
(2001). Second, the indirect impact of commitment on green
collaboration with suppliers means that in order to implement
the collaborative approach the rm should possess the appropriate purchasing capabilities, which are in turn inuenced by the
rms environmental commitment. These results are consistent
with the ndings of Bowen et al. (2001). These authors found
that: (1) supply management capabilities are developed by a
proactive corporate environmental approach and (2) supply capabilities have an impact on collaborative approaches whereas
supplier assessment is attempted regardless of whether the rm
has the appropriate capabilities.
Our results show that environmental performance has an
impact on purchasing performance. We did not nd any study
relating the environmental and purchasing performances.
However, our nding may be in line with all those studies that
have found a positive relationship between environmental management and economic performance (see for example, Alvarez-Gil
et al., 2001; Zhu and Sarkis, 2004).
Finally, with regards to the impact of both supplier development
approaches (collaboration and assessment) on purchasing performance the results are contradictory. Whereas green supplier assessment has a positive impact on purchasing performance, green
collaboration with suppliers has a negative effect. The positive effect
of assessment on purchasing performance is consistent with the
results of Krause et al. (2000) and Sanchez-Rodriguez et al. (2005).
However, the possible negative relationship between green collaboration and purchasing performance is contradictory to the ndings of these two previous studies. Our results show that visits to
suppliers, training suppliers and having joint efforts to reduce waste
could have a negative impact on purchasing performance: these
practices may lead to increases in costs and non-conformance,
dissatisfaction of customers departments, non-accomplishment of
quantities, etc. One possible explanation for this is that while green
collaboration with suppliers aimed at improving environmental
performance pays off in terms of environmental results, these
collaborative practices may interfere with other logistics activities.
This interference may result in a negative impact on purchasing
measures such as on-time delivery, target costs, and quantities.
Nevertheless, this effect is only signicant at the 10% level. Furthermore, the total effect of green collaboration on purchasing performance amounts to almost zero ( 0.054), because the negative
direct impact is balanced by the positive indirect inuence mediated
by environmental performance.
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
Acknowledgement
Cristina acknowledges nancial support from research grant
ECO2010-16840 from the Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Appendix
See Table A1.
Table A1
Construct
No.
Item
Phrase
Sources
Strategic level of
purchasing
POS1
Strategy
Planning process
1.80
POS2
POS3
Planning revisions
5.24
1.74
EC1
Policy statement
5.67
1.49
EC2
EC3
Value
Understanding
5.56
5.28
1.55
1.46
CAP1
Training
3.80
1.82
CAP2
CAP3
Goals
Evaluation
4.38
2.54
1.68
1.68
AS1
Evaluation
5.93
1.48
AS2
AS3
Feedback
Audits
5.39
3.67
1.98
2.14
COL1
Visit
4.91
2.01
COL2
Training
2.99
2.08
4.56
5.10
5.39
5.37
5.28
1.69
1.62
1.58
1.47
1.45
5.15
5.36
1.59
1.47
6.21
1.18
5.31
5.66
5.78
5.51
1.11
1.04
1.19
0.92
Environmental
commitment
Purchasings
environmental
capabilities
Green supplier
assessmentn
Green collaboration
with suppliersn
Environmental
performance
improvement
Purchasing
performance
COL3
EF1
EF2
EF3
EF4
Joint efforts
Waste reduction
Compliance
Recycling
Environmental
protection
EF5
Reputation
EF6
Overall
environmental
performance
PERF1 Specications
PERF2
PERF3
PERF5
PERF6
On time delivery
Target cost
Quantities
Internal
satisfaction
Sanchez-Rodriguez et al.
(2005)
Mean SD
1.91
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006
R.O. Large, C. Gimenez Thomsen / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management ] (]]]]) ]]]]]]
References
Alvarez-Gil, M.J., Jimenez, J.B., Lorente, J.C., 2001. An analysis of environmental
management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels.
Omega 29 (6), 457471.
Angell, L.C., Klassen, R.D., 1999. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management 17, 575598.
Aragon-Correa, J., Sharma, S., 2003. A contongent resource-based view of proactive
corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28 (1),
7188.
Bentler, P.M., Chou, C.P., 1987. Practical issues in Structural Modeling. Sociological
Methods & Research 16 (1), 78117.
Bowen, F., Cousins, P., Lamming, R., Faruk, A., 2001. The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management 10
(2), 174189.
Carr, A.S., Pearson, J.N., 1999. Strategically managed buyersupplier relationships
and performance outcomes. Journal of Operations Management 17, 497519.
Carter, C., Carter, J., 1998. Interorganisational determinants of environmental
purchasing: initial evidence from the consumer products industry. Decision
Sciences 29 (3), 659684.
Carter, C., Ellram, L., Ready, K., 1998. Enviromental purchasing: benchmarking our
German counterparts. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials
Management 34 (4), 2838.
Carter, C.R., Kale, R., Grimm, C.M., 2000. Environmental purchasing and rm
performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E:
Logistics and Transportation Review 36 (3), 219228.
Chen, I.J., Paulraj, A., 2004. Towards a theory of supply chain management: the
constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management 22,
119150.
Chin, W., 1998. The Partial Least Squares approach to Structural Equation
Modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research.
Erlbaum, Mahwah and London, pp. 295336.
Chin, W.W., Newsted, P.R., 1999. Structural Equation Modeling analysis with small
samples using Partial Least Squares. In: Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Statistical strategies
for small sample research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 307342.
Daily, B.F., Bishop, J., Steiner, R., 2007. The mediating role of EMS teamwork as it
pertains to HR factors and perceived environmental performance. Journal of
Applied Business Research 23 (1), 95109.
Diaconis, P., Efron, B., 1983. Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Scientic
American 248, 96108.
Drumwright, M.E., 1994. Socially responsible organisational buying: environmental concern as a non-economic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing 58 (3),
119.
Efron, B., 1979. Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. Annals of
Statistics 7, 126.
Ellram, L.M., Carr, A.S., 1994. Strategic purchasing: a story and review of the
literature. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 30
(3), 28.
Florida, R., 1996. Lean and Green: the move to environmentally conscious
manufacturing. California Management Review 39 (1), 80105.
Geffen, C., Rothenberg, S., 2000. Suppliers and environmental innovation: the
automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations and Production
Management 20 (2), 166186.
Grant, D.B., Teller, C., Teller, W., 2005. Web-based Surveys in Logistics Research:
Please cite this article as: Large, R.O., Gimenez Thomsen, C., Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence
from Germany. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006