Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities,
in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest
to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of
education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the
timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.
1 +, 1 +
01 ' 5
Jawaharlal Nehru
! $ ' +-
Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda
! > 0 B
BharthariNtiatakam
Indian
Standard
ICS 91.120.25
(3 BIS 2005
BUREAU
MANAK
August
2005
OF
BHAVAN,
INDIAN
STANDARDS
9 BAHADUR
SHAH
NEW DELHI
110002
ZAFAR
MARG
Price Group 9
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard (Part 4) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council.
Hinlalayan-Naga Lushai region, Indo-Gangetic Plain, Western Indi% Kutch and Kathiawar regions are geologically
unstable parts of the country where some devastating earthquakes of the world have occurred. A major part of
the peninsular India has also been visited by strong earthquakes, but these were relatively few in number occurring
at much larger time intervals at any site, and had considerably lesser intensity. The earthquake resistant-design
of structures, taking into account seismic data from studies of these Indian earthquakes, has become very essential,
particularly in view of heavy construction programme at present all over the country. It is to serve this purpose
that IS 1893 : 1962 Recommendations for earthquake resistant design of structures was published and
subsequently revised in 1966, 1970, 1975 and 1984.
in view of the present state of knowledge and in order to update this standard, the committee has decided to
cover the provisions for different types of structures in separate parts. This standard has been split into five
parts. Other parts in this series are :
Part 1 General provisions and buildings
Pafl.2 Liquid retaining tanks-elevated and ground supported
Part3 Bridges and retaining walls
Part 5 Dams and embankments
Part I contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to a[l types of structures. Also, it contains
provisions that are specific to buildings only. Unless stated otherwise, the provisions in Part 2 to Part 5 shall be
read necessarily in conjunction with Part 1.
This standard contains provisions on earthquake resistant design of industrial structures including stack-like
structures. Industrial structures are covered in Section 1 and Stack-like structures are covered in Section 2.
All sub-clauses under the main clause 0.0 of 1S 1893 (Part 1) are also applicable to this part except the 0.4.1.
In the preparation of this standard considerable assistance has been provided by BHEL, IIT Roorkee, IIT Bombay,
[IT Kanpur, NTPC, EIL, TCE, DCE, NPC and various other organizations.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value,
observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall be -rounded off in accordance with
IS 2: 1960 Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised). The number of significant places retained in the
rounded off value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.
Indian
Standard
1 SCOPE
1.1 The industrial structures shall be designed and
constructed to resist the earthquake effects in
accordance with the requirements and provisions of
this standard. This standard describes the procedures
for earthquake resistant design of industrial structures.
It provides the estimates of earthquake loading for
design of such structures.
a) Process industries;
b) Power plants;
c) Petroleum,
industries;
fertilizers
and petro-chemical
1S No.
f) Cement industrie~
g.) Automobile industries;
h) Sugar and alcohol industries;
Title
456:.2000
800:1984
revision)
875
in) *Foundries;
n) Electrical and electronic industries;
P) Consumer product industries;
q) Structures for sewage and water treatment
plants and pump houses;
r) Leather industries;
t) Mill structures;
11)Telephone exchanges;
(second revision)
1343:1980
w) Paper plants.
This standard shall also be considered applicable to
the other industries not mentioned above.
1888:1982
1S No.
1893 (Part 1) :
2002
ELX
EL
Title
4326: 1993
EL,
4998 (Part 1) :
1992
Criteria
for design of reinforced
Part
1
concrete
chimneys:
Assessment
of loads (second
ELZ
e.s>
revision)
6403: 1981
1989
SP 6 (6) :
3 GENERAL
EARTHQUAKE
TERM-INOLOGY
ENGINEERING
M,
h,
s,
S;g
SIDL
Zone factor
Oj
Qik
Q.
c1
ub
combination
Wi
Complete
method
Spectral acceleration
SRSS
FOR INDUSTRIAL
5 SYMBOLS
Cd,
M,
DL
CQC
FOR
Importance factor
972
M,
19C 3
revision)
13920:
IL
6533 (Part 2)
s
-
g
Spectral acceleration
rock and soil sites
w,
w,
Total weight
of the structure
including weight .of lining and contents
above the base
CT
Coefficient
depending
upon
slenderness ratio of the structure
Dvj D,m
the
structural shell
g
[
l
,),
n
v,
i5i
6 GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Ah
D Max
Zone factor
in mode i, j, k
for
coefficient
Importance factor
Moment of inertia of pile section
Number of piles
3
of Structures
four
c) Category 3 :
6.2 Assumptions
The following assumptions shall be made in the
earthquake resistant design of structures:
whose
failure,
Structures
although expensive, does not
lead to serious hazard within the
plant complex.
where
cracking
may be
Earthquake
EL=
Loaak (EL)
Factors
for
Plastic
Design
Thecombination
proceduresof 7.3.2.1and7.3.2.2
applytothesameresponse quantity (say, moment in a coI umn
NOTE
of Steel
b)
c)
NOTE
shall not
b)
c)
d)
NOTE
Stresses in Materials
a)
arc to
7.4.2
Increase in Allowable
Pressures
in Soils
shall not
include erection
-where
z. zone factor, given in Annex A [This is in
accordance with Table 2 of IS 1893 (Part 1)].
spectral acceleration coefficient for rock and
soil sites given in Annex B [This is in
accordance with Fig. 1 of IS 1893 (Part l)].
I= importance factor given in TabIe 2 is relative
importance assigned to the structure to take into
account consequences of its damage.
~. response reduction factor to take into account
themargins of safety, redundancy and ductility
of the structure given in Table 3.
s~g =
(DBE)
8 DESIGN SPECTRUM
8.1 For all important projects, and all industries
deal ing with highly hazardous chemicals, evaluation
of site-specific spectra for earthquake with probability
of exceedence of 2 percent in 50 years (MCE) and
10 percent in 50 years (DBE) is recommended. All
Category 1 industrial structures shall be analyzed using
site-specific spectra. However, if site-specific studies
arc not carried out, the code specified spectra may be
used with modifications as per 8.3.2. If time-history
analysis is to be carried out, spectra-compliant timehistory shall be determined based on the site-specific
spectra.
9 MATHEMATICAL
9.2 Interaction
Equipment
[/1
s=
and
(R;l)
s,
Interaction
where
MODELLING
A,, =
structure and
are given h-t
(RJI)
Foundation
Constituting
the Foundation
\
/
Type I Rock or Hard Soils:
Type 1[ Medium
gravel
or
and
mixtures
without
with
clay binder,
Soils: All
Type
III
Soft
Soils:
15
SB,
SW
and
S()
(2)
i)
(3)
(4)
(5)
50
so
so
25
25
iii)
Raft foundations
50
50
50
iv)
Combined
50
25
25
50
25
25
/ Isolated
Well foundations
NOTES
I
The allowable
If anv increase in bearing Dressure has alrcadv been Dermitted lor forces other than seismic forces. the total increase in allowable
force is also inciuded shall not exceed the limits specified above
S1 No.
Seismic Zone
Depth Below
Remarks
N Values
Ground Level
(m)
i)
Ill, IVand
<5
15
210
25
For
values
linear
ii)
II
55
15
210
20
of depths
between 5 m uod
interpolation
10 m,
is
recommended.
If soils of smaller Nvahses are met, compaction maybe adopted Io.achieve these values or deep pile foundations going to strooger
strata should be used.
4
The piles should be designed for lateral loads neglecting lateral resistance ofsoi[ layers liable to Iiquify.
Following
a) IS 1498 Classification
b) IS2131
capidy
of
SIMI1OWfouodatioos.
Categories
S1 No.
Importance
of Structures
Factnr
(see 7.1 )
(2)
(3)
Structures in Category 1
2.00
(1)
ii)
Structures in Category 2
1.75
iii)
Structures in Category 3
1,50
iv)
Structures in Category 4
1.00
NOTE Higher importance factor may be assigned to different structures at the discretion of the project authorities
M,=
~R
9.2.1.2
M,
If
Ms + M.
< 0.25
;]
01
Participation
where
A4= mass matrix of the structural system,
M =
(r,)
Lateral
(1)
(2)
(3)
Ordinary RC MomentResisting
ii)
Special RC MomentResisting
iii)
iv)
Frame (OMRF))
3.0
Frame (SMRF))
5.0
a)
Concentric brace
4,0
b)
Eccentric braces
5,0
5.0
v)
a)
Unreinforced
1.5
b)
2.5
3.0
c)
3.0
vii)
4,0
I)
viii)
3.0
ix)
4.0
x)
4.5
xi)
5.0
The
Va]ues
of response reduction factors are to be used for buildings with lateral load resisting elements, and not just for the
OMRF
are those designed and detailed as per IS 456 or IS 800. However, OMRF
in IS 13920.
x)
4)
Buildings with shear walls also include boildings having walls and frames, but where:
Reinforcement
1,)
7)
Ductile shear walls are those designed and detailed as per IS 13920,
*)
Buildings with dual systems consist of shear walls (or braced frames) and moment resisting frames such that:
a) the two systems are designed to resist the total design force in proportion to their lateral stiffness considering the
interaction of the dual system at all floor levels, and
b) the moment resisting frames ar-edesigned to independently resist at least 25 percent of the design seismic base shear.
NOTE
A=
,
M.
PI
where
M,, = (I /Dci);
@c,= the mode vector value from the primary
(3Tc,M,, @ci= 1;
~,.
Multisupport
T = 21T ~ sec
[ g
3~T
$/ 9
=J-S
MS
3.0
-M*
MP+M
2.5
MCXM A
=1-~
-s
2
Model C
4-
2.0
Explanetion
$
i
~
ModelB
a of
secmdary system
1,5
Ii
primary s@em
1.0
0.5
00
iical
0.010
MS
0.100
WITH
SINGLEPOINT
.Om
9.4 Damping
10 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
to direction of force.
only if the total area of all the cut-outs at that level is less than
25 percent of its plan floor area.
analysis
may be used for structures
10.1.4 Simplified
of Category 4 in all seismic zones. However, those
structures of Category 4, which could be identified as
buildings, may be analysed as per provisions of
IS 1893 (Part 1),
Reinforced
Effect
MCE
(3)
(4)
Aluminium
0.02
0.04
ii)
Steel
0.02
0.04
iii)
Reinforced Concrete
0.05
0.07
S1 No.
Material
(2)
(1)
O
NOTE For combined structures, damping ratio coefficient shall be determined based on well established procedures, if a composite
damping ratio coefficient is not evaluated, it shall be taken as that corresponding to material having lower damping.
II
[1
5 w, @,k
,=,
~i .
~ (Q
A =
/
5, w, (O,k)
,..
k= I
where
2, = absolute value of quantity, in mode k; and
where
acceleration due to gravity,
spectrum
performed
using
the
method
design
of
analysis
shall
be
2 =x A=
c
spectrum.
of modes shall be
used for analysis to include the influence of at least
90 percent of the total seismic mass. The model
seismic mass shall be calculated as per the provisions
of 10.2.4.1.
10.2.5.1
Sufficiently
large
number
x, =
g, =
11 DEFORMATIONS
where
. . ..
P,, =
8(2(l+fl).fl5
(1-p)+
4(p
(I+p)
a.
frequency ratio = --#
t
O.)j= circular frequency, inJh
mode; and
12.I Foundations
( Clause 7.1 )
S1 No.
Structures
Category
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Administration
building
2.
2.
3.
Air pre-heaters
4.
5.
Ash dyke
6.
7.
8.
9,
Auto base
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15,
Canteen building
16.
Caustic tanks
17,
Chiller plant
18.
19.
Clarifloculator
20.
21.
22.
Compressor foundation
23.
Compressor house
13 DESIGN CRITERIA
24.
25.
Construction workshop
26.
27.
Control building
28.
29,
Converters
30.
Conveyor galleries
31.
32.
33.
Crusher house
34.
Crushers
35,
(ethylene)
36.
13
Table 5 Concluded
S1 No.
Structures
Category
S1 No.
Structures
Category
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
37.
CW pump house
74.
Polymerisation building
38.
DG hall
75.
39.
76.
40.
DM plant
77.
Process column/vessel/reactors
41.
42,
43.
44.
Extrusion
45.
46.
47.
48.
Filter
building
49,
50.
Fire station
51.
Fire tender
52.
53,
54
55.
on low
RCC pedestal
78.
79.
80.
81.
RCC chimney
82.
Regeneration-building
83.
Scrubber
84.
85.
86.
Silos
87,
2
2
88.
Sphere/bullets
89,
Start-up transformer,
90.
56.
Generator transformer
57.
Hj plant building
58.
Heater /furnace
59.
60.
on
elevated structure
91.
92.
-stores
93.
Substation
94.
Substation buildings
61,
Intake structure
95.
Switch-gear building
62,
Laboratory building
96.
Switchyard
63.
LPG storage
97.
Switchyard structures
64.
98.
65.
99.
Technological
100.
Track hopper
10I.
102.
structures inRCC/steel
or both
bunker bay)
66.
Make-up
67.
Microwave
68.
OD ducts
69.
103,
Tunnel/trenches
70,
104,
Wagon tippler
71.
105.
Warehouse
72.
Pipe rack
106.
73.
107.
Workshop
2
2
14
h
E,.A.g
where
15 DAMPING
The damping factor to be used in determining S./g
depends upon the material and type of construction of
the structure and the strain level. The following
damping factors are recommended as guidance for
different materials for fixed base condition and are
given in the Table 7.
16 HORIZONTAL
of elasticity
structural shell,
of material
of the
SEISMIC FORCE
where
14.2 The fundamental time period, T of a stackIike structure can be determined by Rayleighs
approximation for fundamental mode of vibration as
follows :
and
Sa
/
where
with the
N.
g.
NOTES
i
or column
analogy
or matrix
method
For determining
The simplified method can be used for ordinary stackIike structures. The design shear force, V,and design
15
IS 1893 (Part
4) :2005
Table 6 Values crfC, and Cv
(Clauses
S1 No.
k = hire
(1)
(2)
Cocfticient,
CT
Coetllcicnt,
(3)
(4)
14.4
1.02
ii)
10
21.2
1.12
ii)
15
29.6
1.19
iv)
20
38.4
.25
25
47.2
.30
vi)
30
56.0
.35
vii)
35
65.0
.39
viii)
40
73.8
I.43
ix)
45
82.8
1,47
50 or more
1.8k
1,50
v)
x)
Cv
Table 7 Material
(Cfause
Damping
Factor
1 5)
DIIE
MCE
(3)
(4)
Steel
0.02
0.04
ii)
Reinforced Concrete
0.05
0.07
iii)
0.07
0.10
S1 No.
Material
(1)
(2)
Noms
I
[or elastic base represented by raft on sofi soil or pile found~ltion, the damping may be worked out m weighted
damping based on
For riveted steel stsscks/chimneys, etc, a 5 percent of critical damping may be adopted to account for the frictional losses.
in case of multi-flue
a)
V=
b)
M = Ah WtiDn,
Cv.
W,=
D,, D,m=
where
Al, =
Ah W,. D v
C, = coefficient
of shear force depending
slenderness ratio k given in Table 6,
is recommended.
on
design
horizontal
seismic
coefficient
determined in accordance with 16,
Type
importance Factor
of Structure
(2)
(1)
(3)
1.5
1.5
iii)
1.5
iv)
Un-reinforced
O
ii)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
1.5
t3ectric/trzdlic
Iigbt poles
Steel stack
1.5
Silos
1.5
NorEs
I
In case of important factor given in Table 2 and Table 8 found different, higher values shall be considered.
Tbc valocs of irnpomancc factor, / given in this table are for goidance. A designer may choose suitable values depending on the
Reduction-Factor,
Type of Structure
(2)
(1)
(3)
.
3,0
3.0
iii)
3.0
iv)
2.0
Steel chimney
2.0
2.0
i)
ii)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
Un-reinforced
Reinforced electric/traffic
(Spectrum
1,0
2.0
pote
Modal
17.2.1 Mathematical
Model
Moment-Distribution (DJ
X/hi)
~
F~xed
Soil
Pile
C-A-,
Fixed
Soil
Pile
Foundation
Foundation
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ii)
0.05
0.09
0.13
0.11
0.28
0.21
0,14
iii)
0.10
0.13
0.19
0.16
0.42
0.27
0.19
iv)
0.20
0.18
0.27
0.22
0.64
0.34
0.26
v)
0.30
0.22
0.33
0.28
0.83
0.38
0.31
vi)
0.40
0.27
0.39
0.33
1.00
0.41
0.35
vii)
0.50
0.32
0.45
0.38
I .00
0.44
0.40
viii)
0.60
0.39
0.52
0.45
I .00
0.49
0.46
ix)
0.70
0.48
0.60
0.54
I .00
0.55
0.54
x)
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.65
1.00
0.65
0.65
xi)
0.90
0.77
0.83
O.go
1.00
0.80
0.80
xii)
0.95
0.88
0.91
0.89
I .00
0.89
0.89
xiii)
I .00
I .00
1.00
1.00
1.00
I .00
I .00
(1)
1)A- is the distance from top and h is the height of chimney above the base.
17.1)
S1 No.
D.
Dv
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
04[H2
06[34
1[3
07[3
09[34
but S I
ii)
Rali on soil
(based on N values)
iii)
Pile foundation
04[+111[3
-07[3
065[3
05[8
05[$)4
066[32-020[3+
18
Type of Foundation
Stiffness
(1)
(2)
(3)
I)
K, = 32( 1- u) Gr(,/(7-8u)
2)
Kr=8GrJ/3
(1-u)
Annular raft:
ii)
1)
2)
Translational
To =
(EJm/ Vh)fi
of pile material,
r,, =
foundation,
2
Classification
When soil structure interaction effects are to be considered; shear wave velocities are to be determined by suitable methods.
Minimum
The maximum lateral deflection of.the top of a stacklike structure under all service conditions, prior to the
application of load factors, shall not exceed the limits
set forth by the following equation:
D Max = 0.003 h
where
D=
Max
h =
ANNEX
11
0.10
u Thezoningis as per IS
111
0.16
20
IV
0.24
0.36
ANNEX
(Clauses
B
8.2)
DESIGN SPECTRUM
3.0
2.0
1.5
:
1.0
0.5 -0.0
0.0
~...,
Type II (Medium Soil)
1 .,
i, ,,
Type Ill (Soft Soil)
1 ,
,.
! .
, ..
t .
! .,.
t ..
, ,,
\. ..$.
.
\,, ..
. .... ...
~:
.
..
%.%. %..
...-.. ...............
-.....
............
-------s--...............
-----------......... .................
-------- -----------------I
0.5
1.0
1.5
I
2.0
,
-2.5
3.o
3.5
Period (s)
FIG. 2 RESPONSE
SPECTRA
FORROCKANDSOILSims FOR5 PERCENT
DAMPING
21
4.o
Bureau
of Indian
Standards
BIS is a statutory
institution
established
under
the Bureau
of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and
attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the
copyright
of
all
its publications.
No
part
of these
publications
-may
be reproduced
in any
form
permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing
the standard, of necessary details, such as-symbols and sizes, type or grade designations. Enquiries relating to
copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.
without
the prior
Review of Indian
Standards
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the b%sisof comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are
needed; if the review indicates that changes. are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue of
BIS Catalogue and Standards: Monthly Additions.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Dot: No. CED 39 (5743).
Amendments Issued Since Publication
Amend No.
Date of Issue
Text Affected
23230131,23233375,2323
9402
website: www.bis.org.in
Regional Offices:
Telephones
Central
Eastern
Northern
Southern
22541216,22541442
{ 22542519,22542315
Western
28329295,28327858
{ 28327891,28327892
Branches
23237617
{ 23233841
23378499,23378561
{ 23378626,23379120
2603843
{ 2609285