Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welding International
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/twld20
To cite this article: Ricardo R. Ambriz , Gerardo Barrera , Rafael Garca & Victor H. Lpez (2010) Effect of the weld thermal
cycles of the modified indirect electric arc on the mechanical properties of the AA6061-T6 alloy, Welding International, 24:4,
321-328, DOI: 10.1080/09507110903568778
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09507110903568778
Welding International
Vol. 24, No. 4, April 2010, 321328
Selected from Revista de Metalurgia 2009 45(1) 42 51
Effect of the weld thermal cycles of the modified indirect electric arc on the mechanical
properties of the AA6061-T6 alloy
Ricardo R. Ambriz1, Gerardo Barrera2, Rafael Garca3 and Victor H. Lopez
Institute of Metallurgical Investigations, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Morelia, Mich., Mexico
1.
Introduction
322
Table 1.
Alloy
6061-T6
ER4043
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Zn
Ti
Al
0.561
5.25
0.289
0.8
0.310
0.30
0.052
0.05
0.986
0.05
0.067
0.024
0.10
0.018
0.20
Bal.
Bal.
2. Experimental development
2.1 Operational variables, welding conditions and
mechanical properties
The base metal used was an aluminium alloy 6061-T6
(Al Si Mg) in sheets, with a thickness of 12.7 mm. In
6061-T6
ER4043
Flow strength
(MPa)
Stress resistance
(MPa)
Lengthening
(%)
300
164
328
190
14
Welding International
323
2.2
Thermocouple
X (mm)
Y (mm)
Z (mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Bottom
4.0
6.0
3.0
8.0
10.0
212.0
25.0
27.0
211.0
29.0
0
10.0
42.5
75.0
107.5
140.0
10.0
42.5
75.0
107.5
140.0
72.0
2 9.7
2 6.7
2 1.2
2 10.7
2 3.7
2 8.7
2 4.7
2 2.7
2 10.7
2 6.7
2 9.2
3.
324
Table 4.
Preheat
508C
Position
508C
1008C
1508C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
308.8
368.7
409.5
469.8
530.7
383.1
461.7
445.9
Open
610.5
450.8
542.9
430.3
462.9
479.5
421.3
384.1
460.0
456.4
552.2
534.1
497.9
611.8
577.6
553.1
450.2
577.0
574.9
614.4
693.7
1008C
1508C
16.5
8.0
Heating (8C/s) 16.8 (1.0088C/min) (9908C/min) (4808C/min)
0.8
1.0
Cooling (8C/s) 0.6 (368C/min)
(488C/min) (608C/min)
50
100
150
13.8
15.4
17.2
102.7
101.0
106.5
183.0
181.7
179.3
HAZ
HAZ
HAZ
Welding International
Figure 5.
325
Relationship between the microhardness profiles and the failure zone (a) MIEA 508C, (b) MIEA 1008C and (c) MIEA 1508C.
Figure 6.
particles.
326
Figure 7.
T p 2 T i 1157 2 1118C
107:88C=s;
9:7 s
t
498C
64:478C=s:
0:76 s
Welding International
the development of a fine grain size, as shown in the
micrograph of Figure 9, corresponding to the central
portion of the weld for an MIEA joint preheated to 1508C.
Once the maximum temperature has been reached, this
begins to decrease due to the movement of the heat source
according to the weld speed of the welding process,
according to what has been established in investigations into
moving heat sources by Rosenthal18. During cooling, energy
begins to be supplied to the lateral walls of the joint
preparation, experiencing a drop in temperature until a
minimum, corresponding to 7378C, is reached, which is
above the fusion point of the base material (6528C) and of the
filler material (6308C). At this point, the lateral walls are
completely fused and consequently a liberation of the latent
heat of fusion occurs, which represents the energy generated
during the liquidsolid transformation, which is absorbed by
the liquid metal, increasing its temperature by around 758C in
a short time, 1.41 s, reaching a maximum of 8128C.
The classical theory for heterogeneous nucleation
explains that the form in which the latent heat of fusion is
dissipated determines the growth mechanism and final
structure of the solidified material. This theory was the basis
for the development of the ideas of Garcia et al.13, who
explained, schematically, the behaviour of the cooling rate in
traditional welding processes and by IEA (Figure 10).
It can be seen that in the case of solidification for
traditional welding, subsequent to the sub-cooling, there
exists a thermal stabilization (columnar growth) and,
afterwards, if the conditions are present, there may be
equiaxial grain growth due to the constitutional subcooling. However, in the case of welding via IEA, there is
a sub-cooling of the liquid, then a recalescence and,
finally, a continuous cooling at a high-cooling rate.
Consequently, it is important to evaluate the
temperature variation of the molten weld pool GL with
respect to the distance from the heat source, corresponding
to the fusion limit (solid liquid) defined by
327
dT L
:
3
dx
Based on the graph measuring the temperature in the
fusion pool, it is possible to obtain the curve segment
corresponding to the cooling of the liquid welding metal
(Figure 11).
It can be seen that the transformation from liquid to
solid, during the solidification process, occurs in a
continuous manner from the fusion temperature of the
alloy of the filler material (6308C) to the solidification of
the latter (5818C).
Based on the polynomial approximation obtained in
the graph of Figure 11, it is possible to carry out the
calculation corresponding to the temperature variation in
GL
Figure 11.
328
1.
2.
3.
Email: ricraf74@gmail.com
Email: gbarrera@zeus.umich.mx
Email: rgarcia@zeus.umich.mx
4.
Notes
Conclusions
. The cooling rate at any condition of MIEA welding
exceeds the TTT curve of precipitate formation, b 0 ,
and, at a given time, these speeds tend to become
similar, since the mechanical resistance is practically the same due to the transition of precipitates of
the b 00 phase to b 0 .
. The incoherence of phase b 0 with the matrix reduces
the degree of hardening within the HAZ, and the
failure zone, after the traction tests, depends on the
preheating in MIEA welds.
. The measurement of temperature in the molten pool
made it possible to determine the cooling characteristics in the liquid metal and to calculate,
approximately, the type of microstructure expected
in the welding metal following solidification.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the National Council for Science
and Technology for its support, the Universidad Michoacana de
San Nicolas de Hidalgo and, in particular, the Technological
Institute of Morelia for all the facilities loaned for the use of its
laboratories.
References
1. Ambriz RR, Barrera G, Garca R. S&I. 2006;11:10 17.
2. Malin V. Weld J. 1995;74:305s 318s.
3. Li Y, Murr LE, McClure JC. Mat Sci Eng A.
1999;271:213 223.
4. Anderson NA. Instrumentation for process measurement and
control. p. 131 133.
5. ASM. Heat treaters guide: nonferrous alloys. p. 204.
6. Huang C, Kou S. Weld J. 2004;83:111s 122s.
7. Myhr OR, Grong O, Fjaer HG, Marioara CD. Acta Mater.
2004;52:4997 5008.
8. Lu MJ, Kou S. Weld J. 1989;68:382-s 388-s.
9. Hatch JE. Aluminum properties and physical metallurgy.
Metals Park, OH: American Society for Metals; 1993.
p. 134 148.
10. Davies GJ, Garland JG. Int Metall Rev. 1975;20:83 106.
11. Garcia R, Lopez VH. J Mater Sci. 2006;42:7856 7963.
12. Garcia R, Lopez VH, Kennedy AR, Arias G. J Mater Sci.
2007;42:7794 7800.
13. Garcia R, Lopez VH, Bedolla E, Manzano A. J Mater Sci
Lett. 2002;21:1965 1967.
14. Garcia R, Lopez VH, Bedolla E, Manzano A. J Mater Sci.
2003;38:2771 2779.
15. Lopez VH, Garca R, Bedolla E. Metall Mater Trans B.
2002;33:932 937.
16. ASTM. Standard test methods of tension testing wrought and
cast aluminum- and magnesium-alloy products [Metric].
West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 1994. p. 419 429.
17. Grong OO. Metallurgical modelling of welding. London:
The Institute of Materials; 1997. p. 221 278.
18. Rosenthal D. Trans ASME. 1946;68:849 866.
19. Sheppard T. Mater Sci Tech. 1988;4:636.
20. Dutta I, Allen SM. J Mater Sci Lett. 1991;10:323 326.
21. Kluken AO, Bjorneklett B. Weld J. 1997;76:39 44.
22. Guiterrez LA, Neye G, Zschech E. Weld J. 1996;116s 121s.
23. David SA, Vitek JM. Mat Rev. 1989;34:213 245.
24. Kurz W, Fisher DJ. Fundamentals of solidification. Switzerland: Aedermannsdorf; 1989.