Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Alternate Power: A Change Is in the Wind, Business Week, 4 July 2005, 3637.
Bloomberg News, Toyota Says It Plans Eventually to Offer an All-Hybrid
Fleet,
14
September
2005,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/14/
automobiles/14toyota.html.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Allen, J.B. and Ferrand, J.L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy,
and pro-environmental behaviour: A test of Gellers actively caring hypothesis.
Environment and Behavior, 31(3) May, 338-353.
10.
Allenby and Richards, 2007 B. Allenby and D.J. Richards, Applying the triple
bottom line: telework and the environment, Environ Qual Manage 8 (4) (2007),
pp. 310.
11.
12.
Amyx, D.A., Dejong, P.F., Lin, X., Chakraborty, G. and Weiner, J.L. (1994),
Influencers of purchase intentions for ecologically safe products: an exploratory
study, in Park, C.W. and Smith, D.C. (Eds), Marketing Theory and Applications:
The Proceedings of the 1994 American Marketing Associations Winter
Educators Conference, Vol. 5, AMA, Chicago, IL, pp. 341-7.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Bellizzi, Joseph A., Hite, Robert E., 1987. Environmental color, consumer
feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychology and Marketing 9
(September/October), 342363.
24.
25.
26.
Buying Green: The Crucial Role of Public Authorities Local Environment, Vol.
10, No. 2, 201209, April 2005, Catherine Day, Director-General for the
Environment, European Commission, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium. 1354-9839
Print=1469-6711 Online=05=02020109 # 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd.
DOI: 10.1080=1354983042000388214
27.
Castaldo, S., Botti, C., 2001. Lo shopping esperienziale. In: Castaldo, S. (Ed.),
Retailing KPMG, 2009. Indian retail: time to change lanes, March. Retrieved on
14
July,
2010
from
/http://www.in.kpmg.com/TL_Files/Pictures/Indian_Retail_Mar09.pdfS.
28.
29.
CERES:
<www.ceres.org>;
<www.un.org/Depts/ptd/global.htm>;
<www.globalreporting.org/>.
Global
Global
Reporting
Compact:
Initiative:
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Climate Policy Architectures for the Post Kyoto By Joseph .E. Aldy and Robert
.N. Stavins: The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements,
Environment, VOLUME 50 NUMBER 3. MAY/JUNE 2008, Pages 8 17. Copy
right of Heldref Publications
35.
Crosby, L.A., Gill, J.D. and Taylor, J.R. (1981), Consumer/voter behaviour in
the passage of the Michigan container law, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45,
Spring, pp. 19-32.
36.
37.
Davenport and Pearlson, 1998 T.H. Davenport and K. Pearlson, Two cheers for
the virtual office, Sloan Manage Rev 39 (4) (1998), pp. 5166.
38.
Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM. Can sociodemographics still play a role in pro.ling green consumers? A review of the
evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 2003;56(6):46580.
39.
40.
Dwivedi, P.R., 2010. Saturation of malls in metros: prospects in tier II and III
cities. India Retailing, Sunday, July 18, 2010; accessed on 18 July,
/http://www.indiaretailing.com/pramod-ranjan-dwivedi-prospects-tier.asp.
41.
42.
43.
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., Nordlund, A.M. (2008), "Interrupting habitual car use:
the importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use
reduction", Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,
Vol. 11 No.1, pp.10-23.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Farhar, B., 1999. Willingness to pay for electricity from renewable resources: a
review
of
utility
market
researchNREL/TP-550-26148
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/26148.pdf1999.
49.
50.
51.
52.
GM Good and Feed and the Traceability and Labelling of GMOs (available at
http:// www.genewatch.org/cropsandfood/labelling/fsa_evidence.rtf). GM Science
Review Panel (2003), GM Science Review: First Report
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
Guler et al., 2002 I. Guler, M.F. Guilln and J.M. Macpherson, Global
Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The
International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates, Adm Sci Q 47 (2) (2002),
pp. 207232.
58.
Hawken, Lovins, and Lovins, note 4 above; see also A. B. Lovins, L. H. Lovins,
and P. Hawken, A Road Map for Natural Capitalism, Harvard Business Review,
May-June 1999, 14558.
59.
60.
61.
62.
http://europa.eu.int/comm./environment/chemical/reach.htm.
63.
http://www.chemistry.org/portal/a/c/s/1/acsdisplay.html?DOC=greenchemistryins
titute.
64.
http://www.chemsoc.org/gcn.
65.
66.
http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/cultivating_the_green_consumer,
Accessed on 29 June 2011
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
Ingrid Verhaegen, Guido Van Huylenbroeck, Costs and benefits for farmers
participating in innovative marketing channels for quality food products, Journal
of Rural Studies, Volume 17, Issue 4, October 2001, Pages 443-456, ISSN 07430167, DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00017-1. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/ article/pii/S0743016701000171)
72.
Isaak, R. (1998) Green Logic: Ecopreneurship, Theory and Ethics (Sheffield, UK:
Greenleaf Publishing; West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press).
73.
74.
J. Ball, California Sets Emission Goals That Are Stiffer than U.S. Plan, Wall
Street Journal, 2 June 2005; and J. Marglis, Paving the Way for U.S. Emissions
Trading,
Grist
Magazine, 14 June 2005,
www.climatebiz.com/
sections/news_print.dfm?NewsID=28255.
75.
76.
J. Erickson, U.S. Business and Climate Change: Siding with the Marketing?
Sustainability Radar, June, www.climatebiz.com/ sections/new_print.cfm?
NewsID=28204.
77.
J. Jaffe and R. Stavins, Linking Tradable Permit Systems for Greenhouse Gas
Emissions: Opportunities, Implications, and Challenges, report prepared for the
International Emissions Trading Association for the UN Climate Change
Conference, Nusa Dua, Bali,
Indonesia, 34 December 2007,
http://belfercenter.ksg .harvard.edu/files/IETA_Linking_Report.pdf (accessed 16
October2008).
78.
J.Makower, Green Marketing: Lessons from the Leaders, Two Steps Forward,
September
2005,
http://makower.typepad.com/joel_makower/2005/09/green_marketing.html.
79.
Jacobsen, G., 2010. The Al Gore Effect: An Inconvenient Truth and Voluntary
Carbon Offsets. www.econ.ucsb.edu/~jacobsen/JacobsenJMP.pdf.2010.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
Kaiser, F., Hbner, G., Bogner, F., 2005. Contrasting the theory of planned
behaviour with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation
behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (10), 21502170.
88.
Kaiser, F., Ranney, M., Hartig, T., Bowler, P., 1999. Ecological behavior,
environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment.
European Psychologist 4 (2), 5974.
89.
90.
91.
Krn, J., and H. Juslin (1999) Results of the Finnish Forestry Wood Chain
Survey, in E. Rametsteiner, B. Pajari and T. Peck (eds.), Potential Markets for
Certified Forest Products in Europe (EFI Proceedings, 25; Joensuu, Finland:
European Forest Institute): 91-129.
92.
Krn, J., F. Steineck and H. Juslin (2001) Green Marketing of Sawn Timber and
Wood Based Panels in Finland and Sweden, Journal of Forest Economics 7.2:
145-68.
93.
Kassarjian, H.H. (1971). Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: The case
of air pollution. Journal of Marketing, 35(3) July, 61-5.
94.
Keogh, P.D., and M.J. Polonsky (1998) Environmental Commitment: A Basis for
Environmental ntrepreneurship?,
95.
96.
Kinnear, T.C., Taylor, J.R. and Ahmed, S.A. (1974). Ecologically concerned
consumers: Who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38(2) April, 20-24.
97.
98.
99.
100.
Legal lookout. Green marketing claims: FTC enters the fray - Lynn l. Bergeson.
November 2008, www.pollutionengneering.eom page 15 accessed on 28 June
2008
101.
Lessons from the green grave yard: Jaquelyn A Ottman. In BUSINESS May /
June 2003 P.31 from EBSCO, Legal Lookout Lynnt Bergeson / Nov 2008,
www.pollutionengineering.com: P.15
102.
103.
Levy, A.S., B.M. Derby, and B.E. Roe. Health Claims Quantitative Study.
Briefing to the International Food Information Council, October 8, 1996,
Washington DC.
104.
105.
106.
Mall shopping behaviour of Indian small town consumers - Arpita Khare, L.D.C.
I.T.S., Allahabad, India: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 18 (2011)
110118: Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage:
www.elsevier.com/locate/jretconser : Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
107.
Maloney, Michael P., and Braucht, G. Nicholas (1975), "A Levised Scale for the
Measurement of Ecological and Knowledge," American Psychologist. 787-90.
108.
109.
110.
McCarty J.A. and Shrum, L. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal
values, value orientations and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of
recycling behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 30(2), 53-62.
111.
112.
McDonald et al., 2006 S. McDonald, C.J. Oates, C.W. Young and K. Hwang,
Toward sustainable consumption: researching voluntary simplifiers, Psychol
Mark 23 (6) (2006), pp. 515534. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
(16)
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
Moore, C., and J. Ihle. 1999. Renewable energy policy outside the United States.
Issue Brief # 14, October, 1999 for the Renewable Energy Policy Project,
Washington, DC. http://crest.org/repp_pubs/repp_publications.html (last accessed
19 April 2003).
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
News
release,
January
15,
2002.
Washington,
http://www.awea.org/news (last accessed 06 Sep 2001).
125.
Nitin Sethi, Four new proposed nuke plants hit green hurdle, ECON. TIMES, July
20,
2010
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-byindustry/etcetera/Four-new-proposed-nuke-plants-hit-greenhurdle/articleshow/6189664.cms.
126.
127.
Peattie K (1998), Golden Goose or Wild Goose? The hunt for the green
consumer; Business strategy and the Environmental conference, Leeds,
September 1998.
128.
129.
130.
DC:
AWEA.
131.
Poe, G., Clark, J., Rondeau, D., Schulze, W., 2002. Provision point mechanisms
and .eld valdity tests of contingent valuation. Environmental & Resource
Economics 23 (1), 105131.
132.
Polonsky et al., 2003 M.J. Polonsky, L. Carlson and M.L. Fry, The harm chain: a
stakeholder and public policy development perspective, Mark Theory 3 (3)
(2003), pp. 345364 (ERA B).
133.
134.
135.
136.
Porter and Reinhardt, 2007 M.D. Porter and F. Reinhardt, A strategic approach to
climate, Harv Bus Rev 85 (10) (2007), pp. 2226.
137.
Pranab Dhal Samanta, India, France Ink Nuclear Deal, First After NSG Waiver,
INDIAN EXPRESS, Oct. 1, 2008, http://www.indianexpress.com/storyprint/368048
138.
Preferable products mean a healthier earth - Volume 107, Number 4. April 1999
Environmental
Health
Perspectives:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/.../pdf/envhper00509-0018-color.pdf.
Accessed on 21 June 2008
139.
140.
Public power costs less. In Annual Directory & Statistical Report, 32. Gainesville,
FL: Naylor Publications.
141.
142.
R. N. Cooper, Alternatives to Kyoto: The Case for a Carbon Tax, in Aldy and
Stavins, eds., note 13 above, pages 10515; and W. D. Nordhaus, Is the Kyoto
Protocol a Dead Duck? Are There Any Live Ducks Around? Comparison of
Alternative Global Tradable Emissions Regimes, working paper, Department of
Economics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 31 July 1998.
143.
Radha Neelkantan, Facing water crisis, India should look beyond nuclear energy,
REVOLT: WORLDWATCH INST. CLIMATE & ENERGY BLOG (Mar. 19,
2010), http://blogs.worldwatch.org/revolt/facing-a-water-crisis-indiashould-
144.
Reiss, P., White, M., 2008. What changes energy consumption? Prices and public
pressures. The Rand Journal of Economics 39 (3), 636663.
145.
146.
147.
148.
Rural Telecom in India: Marketing Issues and Experiences from other countries
Rajesh K Aithal1* and Arunabha Mukhopadhyay1 http://www.csisigegov.org/3/32_319_3.pdf
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
Shlomo Kalish, Vijay Mahajan, Eitan Muller, Waterfall and sprinkler newproduct strategies in competitive global markets, International Journal of
Research in Marketing, Volume 12, Issue 2, July 1995, Pages 105-119, ISSN
0167-8116,
DOI:
10.1016/0167-8116(94)00008-C.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016781169400008C)
156.
Sika (2007), Fordon vid rsskiftet 2006/2007 Vehicles at the turn of year
2006/2007, Sika, Statens institut fr kommunikationsanalys, Swedish institute
for transport and communications analysis, available at: www.sika-institute.se
(accessed 17 August 2008), .
157.
Sinha, R., 2010. Small towns lead the league for marketers. Retrieved from
http://www.merinews.com/article/small-towns-lead-the-league-for-marketers/
15816847.shtmlS.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
163.
T. Howard, Being Eco- Friendly Can Pay Economically; Green Marketing Sees
Growth in Sales, Ads, USA Today, 15 August 2005; and E. R. Stafford, Energy
Efficiency and the New Green Marketing, Environment, March 2003,
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
The Public Purpose (1998). U.S. public schools and private schools: Performance
and spending compared. 18 (January), http://www.publicpurpose.com/ppedpp.htm (accessed on November 10, 2004).
170.
171.
172.
173.
Tognacci, L.N., Weigel, R.H., Wideen, M.F. and Vernon, D.T.A. (1972),
Environmental quality: how is public concern?, Environment and Behaviour,
Vol. 4, March, pp. 73-86.
174.
175.
176.
U.S. wind industry ends most productive year, more than doubling previous
record for new installations.
from
biomass:
http://www.eere.energy.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
Varey, 2010 R.J. Varey, Marketing means and ends for a sustainable society: a
welfare agenda for transformative change, J Macromarketing 30 (2) (2010), pp.
112126. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)
182.
Vargo and Lusch, 2004 S.L. Vargo and R.F. Lusch, Evolving to a new dominant
logic for marketing, J Mark 68 (1) (2004), pp. 117.
183.
Webster, Frederick E., Jr. (1975), "Determining the Characteristics of the Socially
Conscious consumer," Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188-196.
184.
185.
Winneg, K., M.J. Herrmann, A.S. Levy, and B. Roe. Label Testing: Results of
Mall Intercept Survey. Report to the National Council on Competition and the
Electric Industry, 1998.
186.
WRI (World Resources Institute) (2002) Are Business and Industry Taking
Sustainability
Seriously?(Washington,
DC:
WRI,
www.wri.org/trends/business.html, 25 February 2002).
187.
188.
189.
Yoram (Jerry) Wind, Marketing as an engine of business growth: a crossfunctional perspective, Journal of Business Research, Volume 58, Issue 7, Special
Section: Cross-functional cases in management education, July 2005, Pages 863873,
ISSN
0148-2963,
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.01.002.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296304000141)
190.
191.
ANNEXURE
CONSUMER QUESTIONNAIRE
Some personal data about the respondent is vital for the research analysis. This
information will be kept confidential and solely used for academic purpose. Kindly
provide factual information for precision of results.
Personal Data
Name
Gender
:
: M
Age
Educational
Back ground :
Marital Status
Profession
SSC
: Married
Inter
Graduate
P.G
M Phil
above 60
Doctorate
Unmarried
Self
Employed
Professional
Good
Average
Bad
Very Bad
2. How often do you pay for a product of a company that claims of being made as an
eco-friendly one against the routine made products? (Please put a after the
option in the relevant box)
Always
Very often
Often
Rarely
Never
3. How much extra money (in percentage) are you willing to pay on a product for its
eco-friendly attributes? (Circle the appropriate option)
A. Upto 10%
D. 31% - 40%
B.11% - 20%
E. 41% - 50%
C.21% - 30%
F.Above 50%
4. How often does/did a retailer influence you to buy a product on the basis of ecofriendly aspects (Please put a at the relevant box)
Always
Very often
Often
Rarely
Never
5. Among your family members which age group influences you mostly for buying
eco-friendly?
Age groups between (Please put a at the relevant box)
30 49
15 - 29
50 64
65 & 65+
6. What is your priority for buying a product among the below options? (Assuming
1st rank to your maximum priority, 2nd - a little less priority & ..6thbeing least
priority to you) ( Pls Turn Over)
Attributes
Company Image
Packaging
Ingredients
Price
Eco-friendly claims
Benefits
Your Ranking
7. According to you where among the following options do you feel companies can
make efforts to increase eco-friendly products in the market?
(Circle the appropriate option)
D. In Products total manufacturing process
E. In create awareness about such products benefits.
F. In the products ingredients and packaging alone.
1) A & B
2) A & C
8. At what level are you aware about the below environmental issues/ activities
(Circle the digit you feel is apt on the 4 point scale)
a. Reusable container
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
b. Biodegradable Packaging
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
c. Environmental Labeling
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
d. CFCs (Chloro Flouro Carbons)
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
e. Energy conservation
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
f. Recycled paper
1-------------------2-----------------3--------------------4
Most Aware
Aware
Less Aware
Not Aware
b)16- 30%
c) 31 45%
d) 46 60%
e) 61 75%
f) 76% +
11. What is the involvement level of government on a rating scale of 5 about taking
responsibility of promoting the make of eco-friendly products to companies? (
Circle the number along the line you feel appropriate )
0-----------1-----------2-----------3----------4------------5
No
Maximum
Involvement
________________
Involvement
RETAILER QUESTIONNAIRE
Data from a retailer is vital for the analysis of research. This information will be kept
confidential and solely used for academic purpose. Kindly provide factual information for
precision of results.
1. Name of the Store/ Shop
___________________
2. Address
----------------------------------------------------------------
Departmental
Super
Hyper
Stores
Stores
market
market
4. How often do you trade with a companys (supplier) that claims of making an
eco-friendly product against the routine made products? ( Please put a at the
relevant box )
Always
Very often
Often
Rarely
Never
5. How do you rate a customer who insists for an environment friendly product
versus one who goes for normal products? (Please put a at the relevant box)
Very Good
Good
Average
Bad
Very Bad
6. How many customers who visit your store/shop in a day insist on eco-friendly
products on an average. (Put a after the relevant option.)
0-10%
10-20%
41-50%
50% +
21-30%
31-40%
Men Customers
1--------------------2-----------------3--------------------4--------------------5
Always prefer Mostly prefer Not Particular Rarely Prefer
Never Prefer
Women Customers
1--------------------2-----------------3--------------------4--------------------5
Always prefer Mostly prefer Not Particular Rarely Prefer
Never Prefer
8. On what basis do you rank a company (supplier) from the below criteria to
associate with your business(in order of preference 1 being highest rank and 6
being lowest. 1 highest priority for you, 2 next on rank , 3.., 4, 6 ranked
as least priority for you )
Attributes
Your Ranking
Relation ship
Percentage of trade
commission
Ingredients of the
product
Product can be Recycled
Eco-friendly packaging
Distance (in Km)
9. Inducing a consumer to buy a product because it is made in the lines of ecofriendly aspects. (Put a at the relevant box.)
I Very strongly agree
I disagree a little
I strongly agree
I strongly disagree
I agree a little
Im not sure
10. As a responsible sales person what measures among the following do you suggest
for companies to improve promoting products that are eco friendly
G. Increase Credit sales on such products between channel members i.e.,
among
(Manufactures wholesaler retailer)
H. To elaborately explain the dangers of using products whose ingredients are
harmful to the environment.
I. To elaborately explain the dangers of using products those have
environmentally harmful packing material.
J. To promote about the environmental issues in general to the public
specifically showing the advantages of using eco friendly products.
1) Single option between (A, B, C, D) ____________
2) Any combinations in twos and threes e.g( A,B), (A,C,D) _______________
3) All the four_____________
4) Others (specify) ____________
11. What is the marketing communication that you suggest to increase the sale of
Eco-Friendly products?
(Circle the appropriate option)
a. distributing pamphlets
b. advertising in local papers
c. Creating specific shelves to Eco-Friendly products
d. Others ________________________
12. Do you make specific marketing communication about promoting the sale of EcoFriendly products?
Always
( Yes / No )
Very often
Often
Rarely
Never
13. How do you influence/ induce consumer to accept products at higher prices for
Eco-friendly products when he actually comes to your store for purchase of
products? (Circle the appropriate option)
a. Show them the benefits of using eco-friendly products:
b. Support wisdom in taking eco-friendly products
c. Appraise the social responsibility of companies that are making ecofriendly products
d. Others ___________________________________________________________
14. Do you feel that there is a need for a change in the Consumer attitudes about
preferring eco-friendly products? ( Yes / No ) ____________
15. What is the average percentage of change in attitude levels you think is required
more for consumers to insist on buying eco-friendly products? (Put a after the
relevant option)
a) 0 -15%
e)
61 75%
b)16- 30%
c)31 45%
d)46 60%
f) 76% +
16. What is the involvement level of government on a rating scale of 5 about taking
responsibility of promoting the make of eco friendly products to companies?
(Circle the number along the line you feel appropriate )
0-----------1-----------2-----------3----------4------------5
No
Maximum
Involvement
Involvement
_______________