Velu Pandian Ravichandran

SPSS Lab 4 : Analysis on the Last page

Question 1 : Describe and interpret the Zscore
Descriptive analysis of the variables
Descriptive Statistics
N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Presentation

36

5.6

8.9

7.437

.9182

Cleanliness

36

2.9

4.6

3.762

.4413

Taste

36

4.0

6.8

5.553

.6322

Balance

36

.0

2.2

.969

.5701

Valid N (listwise)

36

Descriptive analysis of the standardized variables For interpretation purposes Only

Descriptive Statistics
N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Zscore(Presentation)

36

-2.03124

1.54720

.0000000

1.00000000

Zscore(Cleanliness)

36

-2.05019

1.99623

.0000000

1.00000000

Zscore(Taste)

36

-2.45606

1.97276

.0000000

1.00000000

Zscore(Balance)

36

-1.70041

2.15841

.0000000

1.00000000

Valid N (listwise)

36

Normal distribution, 95% of the distribution is between -2 and 2.

Zscore values > 2 or < -2 Extreme Values

Question 2 : Analyse the correlation matrix R and explain why you can run a
factorial analysis.

Correlations
Zscore(Presentat Zscore(Cleanline
ion)
Zscore(Presentation)

Pearson Correlation

ss)

products
Covariance
N
Zscore(Cleanliness)

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sum of Squares and Crossproducts
Covariance
N

Zscore(Taste)

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sum of Squares and Crossproducts
Covariance
N

Zscore(Balance)

Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Sum of Squares and Crossproducts
Covariance
N

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

+/- 2/n =>2/36=+/-0.333

Zscore(Balance)

.712**

.513**

-.398*

.000

.001

.016

35.000

24.922

17.963

-13.928

1.000

.712

.513

-.398

36

36

36

36

-.402*

.023

.015

Sig. (2-tailed)
Sum of Squares and Cross-

Zscore(Taste)

.712

**

.000

.377

24.922

35.000

13.193

-14.072

.712

1.000

.377

-.402

36

36

36

36

.513**

.377*

-.668**

.001

.023

17.963

13.193

35.000

-23.365

.513

.377

1.000

-.668

36

36

36

36

-.398*

-.402*

-.668**

.016

.015

.000

-13.928

-14.072

-23.365

35.000

-.398

-.402

-.668

1.000

36

36

36

36

.000

Matrix is Symmetric and correlations are outside (-0.33,0.33)

Question 3 , 4, 5 & 6 (Explanations and Interpretation Given Below)
Factor Analysis
Total Variance Explained
Initial Eigenvalues
Component

Total

% of Variance

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

2.537

63.417

63.417

2.537

63.417

63.417

.850

21.243

84.660

.850

21.243

84.660

.382

9.562

94.222

.231

5.778

100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Matrixa
Component
1

Zscore(Presentation)

.830

.403

Zscore(Cleanliness)

.783

.504

Zscore(Taste)

.803

-.432

-.769

.497

Zscore(Balance)

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.a

a. 2 components extracted.

Component Score Coefficient Matrix

Component
1

Zscore(Presentation)

.327

.474

Zscore(Cleanliness)

.309

.593

Zscore(Taste)

.317

-.508

-.303

.585

Zscore(Balance)

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Scores.
Component Score Covariance Matrix
Component

1.000

.000

.000

1.000

School
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
School
REGR factor score 1 for

Missing
Percent

Total
Percent

Percent

Cambronn

12

100.0%

0.0%

12

100.0%

Garibald

12

100.0%

0.0%

12

100.0%

Sko

12

100.0%

0.0%

12

100.0%

analysis 1

Descriptives
School
REGR factor score 1 for

Cambronn

Statistic
Mean

-.1948437

analysis 1
95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

-.8845321

Upper Bound

.4948448

for Mean

Std. Error
.31335442

5% Trimmed Mean

-.1478043

Median

.0827993

Variance

1.178

Std. Deviation

Garibald

1.08549156

Minimum

-2.42191

Maximum

1.18552

Range

3.60743

Interquartile Range

1.91646

Skewness

-.715

.637

Kurtosis

-.173

1.232

-.0479483

.25052979

Mean
95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

-.5993607

Upper Bound

.5034640

for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation

-.0368293
.2853231
.753
.86786066

Minimum

-1.33781

Maximum

1.04177

Range

2.37958

Interquartile Range

1.59741

Skewness

-.318

.637

Kurtosis
Sko

Mean
95% Confidence Interval

-1.722

1.232

.2427920

.30850633

Lower Bound

-.4362258

Upper Bound

.9218099

for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean

.3009525

Median

.5931711

Variance
Std. Deviation

1.142
1.06869727

Minimum

-2.07194

Maximum

1.51064

Range

3.58258

Interquartile Range

1.54036

Skewness
Kurtosis

-1.052

.637

.573

1.232

Question 3, 4, 5 & 6:
Quality of F1=1/p=2.537/4 = 63.417%
F1= Zscore(Presentation)*0.327+ Zscore(Cleanliness)*0.309+ Zscore(Taste)*0.317- Zscore(Balance)*(0.303)
F1 is maximum when Cleanliness and balance are high and when balance is low.

Sko seems to have higher scores followed by Garibaldi and finally Cambronne. Garibaldi seems to have more evenly
distributed scores with grade more concentrated.
We believe that there exists a relation between the school and F1.

Quality of F2=2/p=0,850/4=21.243%
F2= Zscore(Presentation)*0. 474+ Zscore(Cleanliness)*0. 593+ Zscore(Balance)*(0.585) - Zscore(Taste)*(0. 508)
F2 is maximum when Cleanliness and presentation are high and when taste and balance are low.
Quality of the projection of F1 & F2 is: (1+2)/4=(2.537+0,850)/4=84.660%
Projection will have ~ 85% of the information.
Sko School: top right Quadrant. This school trains cooks for high quality restaurants and fast food places
Garibaldi school: bottom of the graph. They have a lower standard than other schools

Cambronne School: Majority close to 0 on the F2 axis but spread on the F1 axis. This school trains high presentation
and cleanliness.