Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGENDA
01
02
Objective
Research
Methodology
03
04
R Square
Conclusion
OVERVIEW
PURPOSE
In this paper we are trying to analyze the impact of Brand Equity on the sales with
respect to various brands .
www.JimsIndia.org
OBJECTIVES
To demonstrate the pattern of sales of three Global FMCG Brands for a period of 8
years.
To Present the Brand Equity of all the three Global FMCG Brands for past 8 Years.
www.JimsIndia.org
INTRODUCTION
Brand Equity is termed as set of asset and liabilities linked with the brand that add or subtract value
provided by the product to firm and its competitors.
In order to analyze impact in global context we have taken three global FMCG brands ( Nestle, Johnson
& Johnson and Danone) which have been listed in top 100 brand in terms of brand equity for the last 8
years by interbrand.com.
The three brands belong to different countries i.e. Johnson & Johnson is U.S based firm, Nestle is
Switzerland based firm and Danone is france based firm.
www.JimsIndia.org
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The Research Design is exploratory in nature. The data used is entirely secondary data collected
from the balance sheets of all the three companies i.e. Nestle, Danone & Johnson & Johnson.
The data for Brand Equity is collected from www.interbrand.com , it is a U.S based brand
consultancy firm.
The data collected has gone through correlation and regression analysis since the data of
dependent and independent variable is in metric form.
For implementing correlation & regression analysis SPSS V 20.0 is used. The sales data and
brand equity data has been analyzed for the past 8 years i.e. 2006-2013. The data is time series
data .
www.JimsIndia.org
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
H1
(0)
H10
(=0)
H2
H20
www.JimsIndia.org
The sales & brand equity for all the three FMCG companies have been listed in the following
table.
Johnson & Johnson
Danone
Nestle
Years
Sales in
Million $
Brand
Equity in
Million $
Sales in
Million
Sales in
Million $
Brand
Equity in
Million $
Sales in
Million $
Brand
Equity in
Million $
2006
53324
3193
12038
15854.05
4638
98500
4932
2007
61095
3445
12776
18807.55
5019
107600
5314
2008
63747
3582
15220
21181.67
5408
109900
5592
2009
61897
3847
14982
21583.07
5960
107600
6319
2010
61587
4155
17010
22728.76
6363
930200
6548
2011
65030
4072
19318
24995.56
6936
836400
6613
2012
67224
4378
20869
27534.56
7498
897200
6916
2013
71312
4777
21298
29372.07
7968
921600
7527
www.JimsIndia.org
10
CORRELATIONS
Correlations
Pearson Correlation
Sales in Million
$ ( Johnson &
Johnson)
Brand Equity in
Million $ (
Johnson &
Johnson)
Sales in Million $
( Johnson & Johnson)
.880**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.004
Pearson Correlation
.880**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.004
www.JimsIndia.org
11
CORRELATIONS
Correlations
Pearson
Correlation
Sales in Million $
(Danone)
Brand Equity in
Million $ ( Danone)
Sales in Million $
(Danone)
.986**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Pearson
Correlation
.986**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
www.JimsIndia.org
12
CORRELATIONS
Correlations
Pearson Correlation
Sales in Million $
( Nestle)
Brand Equity in
Million $
(Nestle)
Sales in Million $
(Nestle)
.842**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.009
Pearson Correlation
.842**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.009
www.JimsIndia.org
13
R SQUARE
Model Summary
Model
R Square
Adjusted R Square
.880a
.775
.737
2682.73789
www.JimsIndia.org
14
R SQUARE
Model Summary
Model
R Square
Adjusted R Square
.986a
.972
.967
809.73669
The value of R square for Danone is 97.2% which indicates that 97.2% of changes in sales of Danone are being
explained by the Brand Equity of Danone.
The Regression equation for sales of Danone is:
YS(D) = -213.176 + 3.691 BE(D)
www.JimsIndia.org
15
R SQUARE
Model Summary
Model
R Square
Adjusted R Square
.842a
.709
.660
246725.13259
The value of R square for nestle is 70.9% which indicates that 70.9% of changes in sales of Nestle are being
explained by the Brand Equity of Nestle. Hence by observing the R square values of all the three FMCG Brands , it
can be estimated that H20 is rejected and H2 is accepted i.e. the Brand Equity does impact sales.
The Regression Equation for sales of Nestle is:
YS(N) = -2038316.246 + 408.262 BE(N)
Where YS(N) is the sales of Nestle and BE(N) is the Brand Equity of Nestle
www.JimsIndia.org
16
CONCLUSION
Results suggest that Brand Equity plays a very important role in enhancing and increasing sales ,
since the study has taken three major FMCG brands which have marked their presence globally and
the data which has been taken is covering a time span of eight years , hence it can be concluded
that the Brand Equity is an important variable which effect sales.
However the results can only be generalized when the research extend beyond the three
companies to each and every company in FMCG sector , it can be regarded as the scope of this
study for the near future.
www.JimsIndia.org
17
REFERENCES
Aaker, David A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: The Free Press, 224 p.
Aaker, David A. and Keller, Kevin Lane (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing, 54, (January), pp. 27-41.
Abhishek Dwivedi, Bill Merrilees, (2013). Brand extension feedback effects: towards a mediated framework, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 30 Iss: 5,
pp.450 461.
Abosag Ibrahim etal. (2012). Examining the relationship between brand emotion and brand extension among supporters of professional football clubs ,
European Journal of Marketing Vol. 46 No. 9, pp. 1233-1251.
Afzal Sarwat (2013). Factors influencing successful brand extension into related and unrelated product categories, Asian Economic and Financial Review,
3(2):216-226.
Dacin, Peter A. and Smith, Daniel C. (1994). The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing
Research, 31 (May), pp. 229-242.
Chernatony, L., de . , L. Hem, E. and M.I. Nina, (2003). Factors influencing successful brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 19: 781-806.
Swaminathan, F. and Reddy., (2001). The impact of brand extension introduction on choice. Journal of Marketing, 65: 1-15.
Ramanathan Jayasankar (2013). Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions: Good to Service and Service to Good, vikalpa, volume 38 No. 2 .
Vanitha Swaminathan, Richard J. Fox, Srinivas K. Reddy (2001). The Impact of Brand Extension Introduction on Choice. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp.
1-15.
Vukasovi Tina (2012). Launching of a new product with the brand extension strategy , Management knowledge and learning International Conference.
www.JimsIndia.org
19
About JIMS
www.JimsIndia.org
Address
3, Institutional Area, Sector-5,
Rohini
(Near Rajiv Gandhi Cancer
Research Institute), Delhi-110085.
Contact Details
Phone : 011-45184000/1/2
Mobile : +91-9871097501
Email : admissions@jimsindia.org
Web Address
www.jimsindia.org
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JimsDelh
GET IN
TOUCH
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/JIMSsec5Rohini
G+:
https://plus.google.com/+jimsrohini
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/user/jimsquery/
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/jaganinstitute-of-management-studies-jims-
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/JimsIndia
Pinterest:
https://www.pinterest.com/jimsrohini/