Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development Program
March 2015
Table of Contents
Acronyms................................................................................................................. xiii
Acknowledgements................................................................................................... xv
Executive Summary................................................................................................. xvi
1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 17
2 Background........................................................................................................ 17
3 Situation Analysis............................................................................................... 19
3.1 Nathenje...................................................................................................... 19
3.1.1 General Information...............................................................................19
3.1.2 Available Water Source..........................................................................19
3.1.3 Water Supply Facilities...........................................................................19
3.1.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................20
3.2 Kasiya.......................................................................................................... 20
3.2.1 General information...............................................................................20
3.2.2 Available Water Source..........................................................................20
3.2.3 Water Supply Facilities...........................................................................21
3.2.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................21
3.3 Nsaru........................................................................................................... 21
3.3.1 General Information...............................................................................21
3.3.2 Available Water Source..........................................................................21
3.3.3 Water Supply Facilities...........................................................................22
3.3.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................22
3.4 Ntaja............................................................................................................ 22
3.4.1 General Information...............................................................................22
3.4.2 Available water Sources.........................................................................23
3.4.3 Water supply Facilities...........................................................................23
3.4.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................23
3.5 Nsanama...................................................................................................... 23
3.5.1 General Information...............................................................................23
3.5.2 Current water Source.............................................................................24
3.5.3 Water supply Facilities...........................................................................24
3.5.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................24
3.6 Malosa.......................................................................................................... 25
3.6.1 General Information...............................................................................25
3.6.2 Current water Source.............................................................................25
3.6.3 Water Supply Facilities...........................................................................25
3.6.4 Water Supply Management....................................................................26
3.7 Nkando Thuchila Market Centre................................................................26
3.7.1 General Information...............................................................................26
3.7.2 Water supply Facilities...........................................................................26
4 Water Demand Projections................................................................................. 27
4.1 Population Projections..................................................................................27
4.1.1 Basic Considerations.............................................................................27
4.1.2 Past Population Data.............................................................................. 27
4.1.3 Population Growth Rate.........................................................................28
4.1.4 Population Projections............................................................................28
4.2 Water Demand Design Criteria....................................................................29
4.2.1 General.................................................................................................. 29
4.2.2 Domestic Water Demand.......................................................................30
4.2.1.1 Domestic Demand Categories............................................................30
4.2.1.2 Per Capita Water Demand Adopted for Market Centres......................31
| Photographs
ii
iii
iv
6.2.4 Nsaru..................................................................................................... 70
6.2.4.1 Water Sources.................................................................................... 70
6.2.4.2 Pumping Station.................................................................................71
6.2.4.3 Pumping Mains................................................................................... 71
6.2.4.4 Water Treatment................................................................................. 71
6.2.4.5 Storage Facilities................................................................................ 71
6.2.4.6 Distribution Network...........................................................................71
6.2.5 Ntaja...................................................................................................... 72
6.2.5.1 Water Sources.................................................................................... 72
6.2.5.2 Pumping Station.................................................................................72
6.2.5.3 Pumping Mains................................................................................... 72
6.2.5.4 Water Treatment................................................................................. 73
6.2.5.5 Storage Facilities................................................................................ 73
6.2.5.6 Distribution Network...........................................................................73
6.2.6 Nsanama............................................................................................... 73
6.2.6.1 Water Sources.................................................................................... 73
6.2.6.2 Pumping Station.................................................................................74
6.2.6.3 Pumping Mains................................................................................... 74
6.2.6.4 Water Treatment................................................................................. 74
6.2.6.5 Storage Facilities................................................................................ 74
6.2.6.6 Distribution Network...........................................................................74
6.2.7 Malosa................................................................................................... 74
6.2.7.1 Water Sources.................................................................................... 74
6.2.7.2 Transmission Mains............................................................................. 75
6.2.7.3 Water Treatment Plant........................................................................75
6.2.7.4 Storage Facilities................................................................................ 75
6.2.7.5 Distribution Network...........................................................................75
6.2.8 Nkando.................................................................................................. 75
6.2.8.1 Water Sources.................................................................................... 75
6.2.8.2 Pumping Station.................................................................................76
6.2.8.3 Pumping Mains................................................................................... 76
6.2.8.4 Water Treatment................................................................................. 76
6.2.8.5 Storage Facilities................................................................................ 76
6.2.8.6 Distribution Network...........................................................................76
7 Cost Estimates................................................................................................... 78
7.1 Unit Costs.................................................................................................... 78
7.2 Summary of Cost Estimates for Market Centres..........................................78
7.2.1 Nathenje................................................................................................ 79
7.2.2 Kasiya.................................................................................................... 81
7.2.3 Nsaru..................................................................................................... 83
7.2.4 Ntaja...................................................................................................... 84
7.2.5 Nsanama............................................................................................... 86
7.2.6 Malosa................................................................................................... 88
7.2.7 Nkando.................................................................................................. 89
8 Environmental and Social Issues........................................................................91
8.1 The Validity of the Project............................................................................91
8.2 Existing Sewage Disposal Facilities..............................................................91
8.3 Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project............................................92
8.3.1 Impact from Site Selection.....................................................................92
8.3.2 Impacts from Construction....................................................................92
| Photographs
Figures
FIGURE 1: TYPICAL GROUND WATER SYSTEM ARRANGEMENT...........................................................114
FIGURE 4.1 SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF OPTION 2............................................................................115
Tables
TABLE 4.1: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS OF SELECTED MARKET CENTRES.......................27
TABLE 4.2: ANNUAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE GROWTH RATES FOR SELECTED MARKET CENTRES...........28
TABLE 4.3: POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR MARKET CENTRES............................................................29
TABLE 4.4: ESTIMATE OF BREAKDOWN OF PER CAPITA DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND BASED ON WATER USE
....................................................................................................................................... 31
TABLE 4.5: PER CAPITA WATER DEMAND ADOPTED BY DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS................................32
TABLE 4.6: PER CAPITA WATER DEMAND ADOPTED FOR SELECTED MARKET CENTRES............................32
TABLE 4.7: SELECTED INDICTORS OF LEVEL OF ACCESS TO POTABLE WATER..........................................33
TABLE 4.8: PERCENTAGE USED TO CALCULATE POPULATION TO BE SERVED BY DEMAND CATEGORY...........35
TABLE 4.9: PERCENTAGE WATER DEMAND OF DOMESTIC DEMAND......................................................36
TABLE 4.10: WATER LOSS AS PERCENTAGE OF MAXIMUM DAY DEMAND..............................................37
TABLE 4.11: SUMMARY OF WATER DEMAND FOR NATHENJE...............................................................39
TABLE 4.12: SUMMARY OF WATER DEMAND FOR KASIYA...................................................................40
TABLE 4.13: SUMMARY OF WATER DEMAND FOR NSARU...................................................................41
TABLE 4.14: SUMMARY OF WATER DEMAND FOR NTAJA....................................................................42
TABLE 4.15: SUMMARY FOR WATER DEMAND FOR NSANAMA.............................................................43
TABLE 4.16: SUMMARY FOR WATER DEMAND FOR MALOSA...............................................................44
TABLE 4.17: SUMMARY FOR WATER DEMAND FOR NKANDO...............................................................45
TABLE 5.1: RECOMMENDED LIMITS FOR SELECTED WATER CONSTITUENTS............................................48
TABLE 5.2: BOREHOLE DATA....................................................................................................... 48
TABLE 6.1: HAZEN-WILLIAMS COEFFICIENT....................................................................................64
TABLE 6.2: DESIGN PERIOD AND EXPECTED LIFE TIME OF WATER SUPPLY COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURES 65
| Photographs
vi
Acronyms
AfDB
ACGF
AusAID
AWSP
COMWASH
DFID
DMA
| Photographs
vii
EIB
EU
European Union
GOM
Government of Malawi
HWA
Health Worker
IDA
JICA
JMP
MDG
MDGS
MICS
MIWD
NWDP
NGO
Non-Government Organisation
OPEC
Oil Producing
PCUt
PMU
RWB
RWSS
UNICEF
WATSAN
WSI
WUA
| Photographs
viii
Acknowledgements
The Cardno Acil Pty Ltd wish to express their gratitude to all persons and
organizations involved in the production of this report. The Consultant would like to
particularly extend appreciation and thanks to the Ministry of Irrigation and Water
Development and the Management of National Water Development Program and its
staff for their untiring support in providing information and relevant previous study
documentation, explanations to the Consultant during field visits and various
occasions on operational issues relating to this assignment; and general guidance
and advice on the project.
The Consultant would also like to extend his profound thanks for the contributions
made by the various stakeholders including Lilongwe, Machinga, Zomba and
Mulanje District Assemblies and all government institution officers at all the seven
centres for the valuable ideas and contributions to the project; and also all the
various members who contributed in all aspects to the successful completion of this
report.
| Photographs
ix
Executive Summary
This Baseline Assessment Report outlines the existing system, proposed works and
cost estimates for Seven Market Centres of Nathenje, Nsalu and Kasiya in Lilongwe
District, Malosa in Zomba District, Ntaja and Ulongwe in Machinga District and
Mkando in Mulanje District. AusAID has proposed support for the Government of
Malawis efforts to increase access to water supply and sanitation services in towns
in Malawi. This will be achieved through co-financing the African Development
Banks (AfDB) investment plan in support for National Water Development Program
(NWDP).
Therefore, this report describes all available alternatives and the implication of
choosing any alternative to enable appraisal by AusAID management of the
proposed program to support the NWDP in the seven market centres in four
districts. AusAID funding of AUD17 million is proposed to support the AfDB funded
program over two years FY 09/10 and FY 10/11 through co-financing NWDP to
increase access to water supply services and sanitation in the market centers,
improve water security through improved WRM and provide support for improved
institutional arrangements and capacity building of Regional Water Boards and
Local Government.
Currently, all market centres do not have piped water supply systems apart from
Malosa. The available water supply is through boreholes which are equipped with
hand pumps. Institutions such as Clinics and ADMARCs have boreholes which are
fitted with motorized pumps. Hence water is pumped from the boreholes to
elevated tanks which supply the institutions through a simple reticulation system.
The coverage of these reticulation systems is just the institutions themselves and
their residential houses. Malosa has a gravity fed water supply scheme which gets
its water from Likwenu River. This system supply all the mission establishment at
the centre which include a hospital, nursing school secondary school and a lay
training centre. Apart from the institutional establishments, the market centre is
supplied with boreholes and a rural gravity fed system called Lufani.
The management of the available water facilities is done by the institutions that
own the systems. Community boreholes are managed by water point committees
which comprise of elected members from the beneficiary communities. Vibrancy of
these committees is variable depending on who is elected. The water point
committees are responsible for operation and maintenance of the borehole which is
funded through cash contributions from the beneficiary households.
One main important component of a realistic and viable water supply project is a
well-conceived assessment of population and economic growth, supported by
current/future land use plans, and as far as possible, an accurate projection of water
consumption and demand pattern. Therefore, the Consultant had to work out the
population and water demand estimates for each market centre for design year of
2030. Some of the main issues which were covered included the demand categories
taking into account the present and future development situation of the Town. The
water demand consists of domestic, institutional, commercial, industrial, animal in
some cases and water for fire fighting. Unaccounted for water is also included in the
demand projections to accommodate the losses without affecting the service level
to the consumers.
| Photographs
Below is a table containing the summary of the projected population and the
projected demand for each centre.
Market Centre
2030
Projected Population
Projected Maximum
Day Water Demand
M3/day
Nathenje
9,000
1,250
Kasiya
5,477
738
Nsaru
3,993
507
Ntaja
11,049
1,535
Nsanama
8,286
1,117
Malosa
7,538
1,047
Nkando
3,971
535
49,314
1,255,479
Total
In order to assess the water supply situation at the selected market centres and
hence recommend options for water supply source, the Consultant visited all sites in
December 2009. These visits were complemented with desk studies on existing
water supply systems for the above-mentioned centres. The assessment entailed
both the adequacy of the available water resources to meet the existing and
projected water demand as well as the suitability of the quality of water for human
consumption. The investigations earmarked both groundwater and surface water
sources without taking into account storage facilities. Thus, surface water intakes
were considered where resources were noted to be available in adequate quantity
and quality, with little risk of water pollution or where water pollution could be
economically prevented. Reliability of the supply was another important factor that
was given serious consideration in the investigations.
Water samples were also collected from all possible water sources for the centres
for analysis of physical, chemical and biological composition by the Central Water
Quality Laboratory. The results of samples got from boreholes, generally show that
the water is suitable for human consumption whilst surface water sources require
full scale treatment. Additionally, all samples indicated that the concentrations of
fluoride, iron and sulphate, which are problem elements in the Precambrian
Basement Complex aquifer, are very low apart from surface water source from Mudi
River in Kasiya which has high iron content.
| Photographs
xi
Thereafter, the Consultant had to come up with the proposed water supply systems
for each market centre with associated cost estimates. Below is a summary of the
proposed systems for the market centres.
Market
Centre
Proposed System
Estimated Cost
US$
Nathenje
1,348,400.00
Kasiya
1,160,980.00
Nsaru
978,270.00
Ntaja
1,613,150.00
Nsanama
1,434,670.00
| Photographs
xii
Malosa
2,098,850.00
Nkando
966,750.00
Total
9,601,070.00
| Photographs
xiii
| Photographs
xiv
1 Introduction
This Baseline Assessment Report outlines the existing system, proposed works and cost
estimates for Seven Market Centres of Nathenje, Nsalu and Kasiya in Lilongwe District,
Malosa in Zomba District, Ntaja and Ulongwe in Machinga District and Mkando in Mulanje
District. Therefore, this report describes all available alternatives and the implication of
choosing any alternative to enable appraisal by AusAID management of the proposed
program to support the NWDP in the seven market centres in four districts. The objective
of this consultant service is to provide sufficient information in terms of the details and
cost of the program to enable preparation of a Design Summary Implementation
Document (DSID) that will satisfy AusAID appraisal requirements.
2 Background
Australias $300 million Water and Sanitation Initiative (WSI) will be implemented from July
2009 to June 2011. The Africa Water and Sanitation Program (AWSP) will be the largest
regional/country program supported by the WSI. It will focus on Sub Saharan Africa. The
AWSP will be a key part of Australias expanded support to Africa. AusAID has proposed
support for the Government of Malawis efforts to increase access to water supply and
sanitation services in towns in Malawi. This will be achieved through co-financing the
African Development Banks (AfDB) investment plan in support for National Water
Development Program.
Malawis National Water Development Program (NWDP) is a sector program of approx.
US$300 million that covers all of Malawi and aims at 80% coverage of improved water
supply and sanitation by 2015. Available financing for the rural water supply and
sanitation (RWSS) component (including towns), which will benefit 4.45 million rural and
district people, is approx. US$142 million, and the water resources component, which will
benefit all Malawians, is US$16 million. NWDP has four components: C-1) Urban Water
Supply and Sanitation; C-2) Town, Market Centre and Rural Piped and Point Water Supply
and Sanitation; C-3) Water Resources Management; and C-4) Program Management and
Capacity Building.
AfDBs current funding of US$48 million for NWDP supports work in four districts, Lilongwe,
Zomba, Machinga and Mulanje. Funding includes US$42.5 million from the Africa
Development Fund for C2(c) rural piped water systems, C2(d) rural water supply and
sanitation, C3 Water Resource management and Program Management and Capacity
Building. A further US$5.5 million is provided from RWSSI Trust Fund for C2 (d) rural water
supply and sanitation. AfDB involvement in NWDP has helped leverage five other
development partners into the program.
AWSP funding will focus on increasing services to population centres in rural Malawi
through the following sub components: (C2) Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Systems
Towns and Market Centres; (C 3) Water Resource management; and (C4) Capacity Building.
AusAID will aim to increase the percentage of funds spent under NWDP on sanitation and
hygiene. It is proposed that AWSP funding will support the same four districts on which
AfDB is currently working, Lilongwe, Machinga, Mulanje and Zomba and will focus on the
market centres of Nathenje, Nsalu and Kisiya in Lilongwe District, Malosa in Zomba
District, Ntaja and Ulongwe in Machinga District and Mkando in Mulanje District.
An outline of the proposed AWSP program in support of NWDP is as follows:
| Photographs
15
Provision of piped water supply facilities in the seven market centres including catchment
protection activities in the specific water catchments proposed for water supply to the
centres.
Provision of sanitation facilities in public places such as markets, schools and health
centres in the seven market centres. Support for latrine construction for disadvantaged
groups such as the disabled and the elderly.
Provison of hygiene promotion programs in the seven market centres and possibly in other
centres depending on availability of funding
Provision of district-wide catchment management program in one of the four Districts
Capacity building to the districts for the establishment of water user associations and local
operators.
AusAID funding of AUD17 million is proposed to support the AfDB funded program over
two years FY 09/10 and FY 10/11 through co-financing NWDP to increase access to water
supply services and sanitation in the market centers, improve water security through
improved WRM and provide support for improved institutional arrangements and capacity
building of Regional Water Boards and Local Government.
| Photographs
16
3 Situation Analysis
3.1 Nathenje
3.1.1
General Information
a. Location
Nathenje is found in Lilongwe in Central Region of Malawi. It is designated as a rural
market centre situated approximately 25 km east of Lilongwe City along North and South
sides of LilongweBlantyre (M1) Road. Geographically, the market centre is at 598000 E
and 8443000 N
b. Land Use
As a designated a rural market, Nathenje has an urban structure plan prepared by the
Town and Country Planning Department of Malawi Government. Urban development has
concentrated on the southern side of the Lilongwe Blantyre (M1) Road and west of
Nathenje River.Establishments at the centre include ADMARC Facility, Private Secondary
Schools, Tobacco Grading Centre, Police Post, Islamic Centre, Veterinary Clinic, Health
Clinic, Agriculture Training School, Primary School to the North, Commercial development
restricted to a few shops, restaurants, bars leisure centres and the Nathenje Catholic
Mission
Greater commercial land usage is found on the Southern side where there is a market and
a Trading Centre. There are some medium density housing and villages of traditional
semi-permanent type.
17
which comprise of elected members from the beneficiary communities. Vibrancy of these
committees is variable depending on who is elected. The water point committees are
responsible for operation and maintenance of the borehole which is funded through cash
contributions from the beneficiary households.
3.2 Kasiya
3.2.1 General information
a. Location
Kasiya is located about 50km West-North-West and it is one of the market centres in
Lilongwe district in the Central Region. It is in Traditional Authority Khongoni and is
accessed by two roads namely T346 from M6 and D179 from S117. It is locates at 539000
E and 8478000 N in the Lilongwe plain.
b. Land Use
The centre has government agency offices namely, police unit and a primary school on the
eastern side of Mudi River, Agriculture station, a court, ADMARC depot. There are also local
authority facilities such as market. There is also a Tobacco Association of Malawi Depot.
Apart from the traders who run grocery shops, hawkers, restaurants and rest houses, there
are institutional houses for staff of various establishments in the area. The rest of the
settlements or buildings are residential homes for the resident community members. The
settlements are mainly located along the secondary roads passing through the market
centre
The market centre is surrounded by both smallholder tobacco gardens and small to
medium farms.
18
Each bore hole has two concrete sinks for washing. The waste water is disposed by means
of soak pits. Currently there are sanitation challenges on most of the boreholes: the drains
and soak pits are blocked by solid wastes such as plastic papers and rubbish and there is
stagnant water.
3.3 Nsaru
3.3.1 General Information
a. Location
Nsaru Market Centre is located about 40km West-North-West and it is a market centres in
Traditional Authority Kabudula in Lilongwe district in the Central Region. It is accessed by
secondary road (S117) and a district road (D184 & D185) from M6. It is connected to
Kasiya by S117 and D179. It is locates at 554000 E and 8465000 N in the Lilongwe plain.
b. Land Use
Nsaru is a typical market centre in terms of its land use which comprise of government
institutions such as primary and secondary schools, Agriculture Training Centre, ADMARC
and a trading centre which includes a rural market.
| Photographs
19
3.4 Ntaja
3.4.1 General Information
a. Location
Ntaja is a market centre in Machinga District. It is located 49 kilometres north east of
Liwonde Town Assembly along Bakili Muluzi Highway. Ntaja Market centre is under T/A
Kawinga. Ntaja is a flat area which lies at an altitude of about 50 m above sea level.
Geographically the centre lies between 7701814 and 7702814 easting and 83o5368
and 83o5568 northing.
b. Land use
The market centre has the following land use patterns which are agriculture, settlement,
commercial and public facilities. Settlement and agriculture are dominating ones.
Agricultural land use alone covers about 57 percent of total land.
Commercial structures at the centre include rest houses, Chipiku store, Southern Bottlers
depot, Peoples Trading Centre, groceries and maize and rice mills. Public facilities present
are Ntaja Police station, ADMARC, Ntaja Health Centre, MTL exchange, primary schools and
community day secondary schools
c. Climate
Ntaja market centre is a low lying area which experiences hot to very hot temperatures
throughout the year. Mean annual minimum and maximum temperatures being 24.3 oc and
33.6oc respectively. October and November are the hottest while July is the coldest. The
mean monthly wind speed is 1.9 m/s.
The area has a mean annual precipitation of 1,122.7 mm. The main rainy months are
November to April. The highest rainfall occurs during the month of January while May to
October is the dry season with very little and scattered and rainfall.
20
pump which discharges into 20 m3 elevated tank and supplies the school and seven staff
houses. The system at the Pastoral centre supplies the hostels and the church while the
system at the Health Centre supplies the centre excluding staff houses.
3.5 Nsanama
3.5.1 General Information
a. Location
Nsanama is another market centre in T/A Kawingas area and is about 12 km to Ntaja. It is
located 38 kilometres north east of Liwonde Town Assembly along Bakili Muluzi Highway.
Nsanama is a flat area which lies at an altitude of about 50 m above sea level.
Geographically the area lies between 76o70 and 77o easting and between 83o40 and
83o44 northing.
b. Land use
Land at the market centre is mainly used for agriculture, settlement, commercial and
public facilities. The surrounding arable land is used for cultivation of crops and rearing of
livestock. The main crops grown are tobacco, rice, maize, paprika and soya while livestock
reared include cattle and goats.
Settlement patterns at the centre are not distinct. It is a mixture of traditional, high
density permanent and medium density housing type.
Commercial and public structures at the centre include wholesales, grocery shops, rest
houses, maize & rice mills, schools, Nsanama Health centre, post office and Nsanama
E.P.A.
c. Climate
Nsanama market centre is a low lying area which experiences hot to very hot
temperatures throughout the year. Mean annual minimum and maximum temperatures
are the same as for Ntaja being 24.3 oc and 33.6oc respectively. October and November are
the hottest while July is the coldest. The mean monthly wind speed is 1.9 m/s.
The area has a mean annual precipitation of 1122.7 mm. The main rainy months are
November to April. The highest rainfall occurs during the month of January while May to
October is the dry season with very little and scattered and rainfall.
| Photographs
21
3.6 Malosa
3.6.1 General Information
a. Location
Namwera Turn-off also known as Malosa is located 40 km from Zomba. The area is found in
Zomba District. The average elevation at the centre of the area is about 760 meters above
sea level and its coordinates are 15o 17S and 35o 12E.
b. Land use
Public facilities at the centre include post and telecommunications and ADMARC. There is
St. Luke hospital under Anglican Church, full primary, secondary and nursing schools. The
centre has an urban structure plan and is connected to the national power grid.
Cassava and rice are major cash crops grown at Namwera Turn off with maize as food crop.
Livestock reared are cattle, pigs, goats and chickens.
c. Climate
| Photographs
22
The area is generally warm and partly humid during summer between August and
November. Average monthly temperature is 21.6c. Mean monthly minimum temperature
is 16.3c with the lowest recorded being 11c between June and August. Mean monthly
maximum is 26.9c with the highest recorded being 32.5c between October and
November.
Namwera Turn Off has mean annual rainfall of 1,294mm with the highest recently
recorded being 1,825.2mm in 2001/2002 season and lowest recently recorded being
866.6mm in 2003/2004 season.
Rain season is normally between November and April. Highest rainfall occurs in the month
of January while summer reaches its peak in October.
| Photographs
23
b. Land use
Land in at the Market Centre is mainly used for agriculture, settlement, commercial and
public facilities. The surrounding arable land is used for cultivation of crops and rearing of
livestock. The main crops grown are maize, paprika and soya while livestock reared
include cattle and goats.
Settlement patterns at the centre are not distinct. It is a mixture of traditional, high
density permanent and medium density housing type.
Commercial and public structures in the Market Centre include wholesales, grocery shops,
rest houses, maize & rice mills, schools, Thuchila Health Centre, post office and Thuchila
E.P.A.
| Photographs
24
Population Projections
3.7.2 Basic Considerations
One main important component of a realistic and viable water supply project is a wellconceived assessment of population and economic growth, supported by current/future
land use plans, and as far as possible, an accurate projection of water consumption and
demand pattern. Reliable estimate of present and future demands flows and discharge can
only be determined based on available and agreed demographic and economic
projections.
Therefore, the Consultant has carefully reviewed the past reports on population growth
and discussed with the Client, Physical Planning Department and the National Statistical
Office. The population forecasts of previous studies have been reviewed and adjustment in
conjunction with the 2008 Population Census results.
The Consultant had a discussion with the District Assembly and Physical Planning
Department Officials on the existing land use plans and incorporated the latest domestic,
institutional, commercial and industrial development and planning.
2008
Population
No. of Households
Nathenje
4,598
981
Kasiya
2,798
611
Nsaru
2,040
406
Ntaja
5,891
1,396
Nsanama
4,418
1,013
Malosa
4,876
1,145
Nkando
2,514
648
27,135
6,200
Total
| Photographs
25
The National Statistical Office (NSO) gives the annual population growth rate for districts.
Assuming that the growth rate for the district is the same as that of a selected market
centre the annual growth rate for the selected market centres are as in Table 4.2
Table 4.2: Annual Population Percentage Growth Rates for Selected Market Centres
Selected Market Centre
Annual Population %
Growth Rate
Nathenje
3.1
Kasiya
3.1
Nsaru
3.1
Ntaja
2.9
Nsanama
2.9
Malosa
2.0
Nkando
2.1
| Photographs
26
2008
2010
2015
2020
2030
Nathenje
4,598
4,887
5,694
6,632
9,000
Kasiya
2,798
2,974
3,465
4,036
5,477
Nsaru
2,040
2,168
2,526
2,943
3,993
Ntaja
5,891
6,238
7,196
8,302
11,049
Nsanama
4,418
4,678
5,397
6,226
8,286
Malosa
4,876
5,073
5,601
6,184
7,538
Nkando
2,514
2,621
2,908
3,226
3,971
Total
27,135
28,639
32,787
37,549
49,314
The water demand for the market centres is determined for different user categories
taking into account the present and future development situation of the Town. The water
demand consists of domestic, institutional, commercial, industrial, animal in some cases
and water for fire fighting. Unaccounted for water is also included in the demand
projections to accommodate the losses without affecting the service level to the
consumers.
In assessing the water demand of different groups within a market centre the following
conditions were taken into account:
Hydraulic condition;
Per capita water consumption;
Water demand forecast for domestic groups;
Water required for non domestic consumption;
Connection profiles for different user categories;
Target coverage (service level);
| Photographs
27
Water quality;
Previous study reports and engineering documents have been referred to in the
assessment and establishment of the different water demand parameters. Past
consumption trends by different consumer groups have also been assessed and analyzed
in order to project the future consumption levels for different user groups. The water
demand is therefore considered for domestic, institutional, commercial, animal, fire
fighting and water losses.
3.9.2
Domestic water demand is the daily water requirement for use by a human being for
different domestic purposes. The water required for domestic purpose is mainly used for
drinking, cooking, washing utensils, flushing toilets and for cleansing of the body. In
addition, water can be used for gardening, cleaning vehicles, washing paved compounds
and miscellaneous domestic purposes. The amount of water used for domestic purposes
varies depending on the lifestyle, living standard, climate, mode of service and above all
on the price of water and affordability by the users as well as facilities owned by the
individual.
Categorization of demand as a standard has not been made so far and different countries
and projects use their own categorization depending on the type and water collection
methods and land use pattern of those particular towns or cities.
The domestic water supply service in urban areas supplied by Regional Water Boards is
categorized in the following mode of services:
(CWP)
(HDHA)
(MDHA)
(LDHA)
| Photographs
28
The four demand categories are commonly used in the study and design of different water
supply projects in Malawi. Accordingly, similar demand categories or mode of services will
be used for the market centres domestic water demand analysis.
Table 4.4 presents the estimated water requirement for different uses by mode of service
where there is adequate water supply coverage. The figures are established based on
assessments from different literatures for developed and developing countries and
existing conditions of the market centres water needs.
Table 4.4: Estimate of Breakdown of Per Capita Domestic Water Demand Based on Water Use
Purpose
HDHA
MDHA
LDHA
(Yard Taps)
(House
Connections)
(House
connections)
Drinking
Cooking
10
10
10
25
Ablution
10
20
35
20
25
50
Washing clothes
10
25
25
35
30
30
Other purposes
10
20
Total
36
75
125
200
| Photographs
29
The Consultant has reviewed the standard figures from the Ministry of Irrigation and Water
Development and per capita demands used in several studies for the three Region Water
Boards for similar schemes to come up with the right per capita domestic demands for the
scheme. Previous studies by Carl Bro Internationals, NIRAS and Norconsult in centres
(including Nathenje) with similar characteristics in terms of settlement pattern the
proportion of housing categories were ascertained by estimation. Table 4.5 below shows
the Ministry of Water Development and Irrigation Standard as well as the NRWB first
Business Plan demands.
CWP
HDHA
MDHA
LDHA
36
75
125
200
NRWB
25
50
80
125
CRWB
36
50
80
125
SRWB
36
50
75
Therefore, in view of the above demands and the Consultants observations of the
settlement patterns in the selected market centres, per capita domestic water demands
for each category have been estimated. Table 4.6 below shows the per capita water
demands adopted to be used in the demand projections for centres.
Table 4.6: Per Capita Water Demand Adopted for Selected Market Centres
Demand Category
CWP
36
HDHA
50
MDHA
80
LDHA
125
| Photographs
30
least time of 24.5 minutes. This could be attributed to the settlement patterns and the
type of terrain. Table 4.7 shows the percentages and time for each indicator of access.
Table 4.7: Selected indictors of level of access to potable water
Selected Indicator for Access
to Potable Water
Un
it
Lilong
we
Proportion of household
population with tube-well/borehole as main source of drinking
water
Machin
ga
Zomba
Mulanj
e
38.0
49.9
62.4
47.5
72.0
70.6
81.7
80.7
Proportion of Household
population using drinking water
from all drinking water sources
treated by applying an
appropriate water treatment
method
23.4
8.3
13.7
7.7
17.3
7.0
6.1
21.6
88.0
90.6
86.1
86.6
mi
n
24.5
50.5
39.7
28.4
31
from CWP for safety purpose in estimating the total water requirement of the Centre at the
end of the design period. It is also assumed that the percentage of service coverage would
reach 90% in year 2015 on the condition that connection works will be expedited within
short period after the completion of the project.
Cognizant of the differences in settlements and level of potential for further developments
based on proximity and ease access from major development centres such as cities and
towns the selected market centres have been categorized into high, medium and low
growth centres comparatively.
Ntaja, Nathenje and Malosa are well connected by main tarmac roads as such they
are considered to be high growth centres.
Nsanama, Kasiya and Nkando despite being better connected are slightly remote.
However, they have more institutions and commercial establishments as such it is
considered a medium growth centre
Nsaru is smaller compared to the other centres and is categorized as low growth
centre though it has a very high potential of growth
The estimated population percentage in each demand category for Selected Market
Centres is shown in Table 4.8 below. The estimated percentages of categories given in
the Table 4.8 are proportions of total population of the selected market centre rather than
for population served.
Assumed Centre
Growth Category
Medium Growth
Centres (Kasiya,
Nsanama and
Nkando)
| Photographs
Demand
Category
Year 2010
Year 2015
Year 2020
Year 2030
Not served
100%
50%
90%
0%
CWP
60
30%
31%
22%
HDHA
25
13%
38%
38%
MDHA
13
6%
17%
27%
LDHA
1%
4%
13%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
Not served
100%
50%
90%
0%
CWP
70%
34%
33%
25%
HDHA
20%
10%
37%
37%
MDHA
9%
5%
17%
28%
LDHA
1%
1%
3%
10%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
Not served
100%
50%
90%
0%
CWP
80%
40%
36%
34%
HDHA
16%
8%
36%
30%
MDHA
4%
2%
16%
28%
LDHA
0%
0%
2%
8%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
32
Description
Institutional
High Growth Centres
(Nathenje, Ntaja and Malosa) demand
25%
Commercial
demand
20%
Institutional
demand
27%
Commercial
demand
22%
Institutional
demand
28%
Commercial
demand
23%
| Photographs
33
There are no plans and no information regarding the establishment of any big industries in
selected market centres. Due to this, special consideration is not made for the industrial
demand in the projection of demand.
| Photographs
2025
25%
34
35
| Photographs
36
Year
No.
2008
2010
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
4,598
3.1%
4,887
3.1%
0%
2%
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
-
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
6,632
9,000
3.1%
1%
4%
13%
239
171
1,170
17%
1,015
13%
370
60%
2030
3.1%
6%
25%
27%
2,430
38%
2,268
30%
38%
3,420
31%
22%
0
-
Not Served %
2020
3.1%
28
%
No.
5,694
13%
-
CWP %
2015
%
No.
100.0%
854
100%
4,598
4,887
1,850
50%
2,847
1,980
10%
663
0%
-
No.
%
2,847
5,969
9,000
0.0%
0%
50%
90%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
14
19
31
66
30
81
113
67
291
146
194
171
71
583
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
25%
17
23%
15
0%
0
32
27%
79
20%
58
0%
0
137
28%
163
15%
87
0%
0
251
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
98
21%
21
119
1
143
2
428
22%
94
522
6
626
7
834
25%
208
1042
12
1250
14
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
| Photographs
37
m3/day
m3/h
| Photographs
238
1,044
2,084
10
43
87
38
Year
No.
2008
2010
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
2,798
3.1%
2,974
3.1%
0%
1%
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
100.0%
%
No.
-
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
4,036
1%
3%
10%
109
618
173
2,974
1,534
1,344
37%
2,026
33%
1,199
50%
1,732
28%
37%
34%
589
2,798
548
17%
10%
100%
5,477
3.1%
87
70%
2030
3.1%
5%
20%
2020
3.1%
17
Not Served %
3,465
9%
-
CWP %
2015
25%
1,369
10%
404
0%
-
No.
%
1,732
3,632
5,477
0.0%
0%
50%
90%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
7
9
21
39
14
49
67
43
173
68
123
101
49
342
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
24%
9
25%
10
0%
0
19
25%
43
20%
35
0%
0
78
27%
92
17%
58
0%
0
150
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
58
21%
12
70
1
84
1
251
22%
55
307
4
368
4
492
25%
123
615
7
738
9
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
| Photographs
39
m3/day
m3/h
| Photographs
140
613
1,230
26
51
40
Year
No.
2008
2010
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
2,040
3.1%
2,168
3.1%
0%
0%
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
0.0%
0
%
No.
100.0%
%
No.
-
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
| Photographs
2,943
0%
2%
8%
53
424
101
2,168
1,118
953
30%
1,198
36%
953
50%
1,263
28%
36%
40%
505
2,040
319
16%
8%
100%
3,993
3.1%
25
80%
2030
3.1%
2%
16%
2020
3.1%
Not Served %
2,526
4%
-
CWP %
2015
34%
1,358
10%
294
0%
-
No.
%
1,263
2,648
3,993
0.0%
0%
50%
90%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
18
25
7
34
48
34
123
40
89
60
49
238
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
23%
0
28%
0
0%
0
0
17%
0
28%
0
0%
0
0
20%
5
25%
6
0%
0
11
25%
31
22%
27
0%
0
58
26%
62
16%
38
0%
0
100
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
37
21%
8
44
1
53
1
180
22%
40
220
3
264
3
338
25%
85
423
5
507
6
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
41
89
439
845
18
35
Year
No.
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
%
No.
%
No.
2008
2010
5,891
2.9%
6,238
2.9%
0%
2%
%
No.
-
0.0%
%
No.
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
| Photographs
%
No.
1%
4%
13%
299
5,891
6,238
2,983
2,839
1,079
38%
4,199
31%
2,316
50%
3,598
27%
38%
30%
100%
1,436
17%
1,270
468
11,049
2.9%
13%
60%
2030
2.9%
216
100.0%
8,302
6%
25%
0.0%
2020
2.9%
36
Not Served %
7,196
13%
0.0%
-
CWP %
2015
22%
2,431
10%
830
0%
-
No.
%
3,598
7,472
11,049
0.0%
0%
50%
90%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
17
23
39
84
37
102
142
83
364
180
239
210
88
716
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
25%
21
23%
19
0%
0
40
27%
98
20%
73
0%
0
171
28%
200
15%
107
0%
0
308
m3/day
%
0
20%
0
20%
124
21%
536
22%
1023
25%
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
42
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
150
2
181
2
118
653
8
784
9
256
1279
15
1535
18
| Photographs
301
1,307
2,558
13
54
107
43
Year
No.
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
%
No.
%
No.
CWP %
Not Served %
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
2008
4,
418
2.9%
2010
4,
678
2.9%
2015
5,
397
2.9%
2020
6,
226
2.9%
2030
8,
286
2.9%
0%
1%
1%
3%
10%
0.0%
9%
27
5%
168
17%
0.0%
20%
135
10%
0.0%
70%
270
34%
100.0%
4,
418
100%
4,
678
917
50%
2,
698
953
37%
2,
073
33%
1,
849
10%
829
28%
2,
320
37%
3,
066
25%
2,
072
0%
623
0.0%
0%
2,
698
50%
5,
603
90%
8,
286
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
11
13
33
61
21
76
104
67
267
104
186
153
75
517
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
24%
15
25%
15
0%
0
30
25%
67
20%
53
0%
0
120
27%
140
17%
88
0%
0
228
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
0
25%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
90
21%
19
109
1
131
2
388
22%
85
473
5
568
7
745
25%
186
931
11
1117
13
1
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
No.
%
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
| Photographs
44
m3/day
m3/h
| Photographs
219
946
,861
39
78
45
Year
No.
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
(Served)
Low Density (%)
%
No.
%
No.
2008
2010
4,876
2.0%
5,073
2.0%
0%
2%
%
No.
-
0.0%
%
No.
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
%
No.
1%
4%
13%
223
4,876
5,073
2,035
2,115
840
38%
2,865
31%
1,725
50%
2,800
27%
38%
30%
100%
980
17%
946
364
7,538
2.0%
13%
60%
2030
2.0%
168
100.0%
6,184
6%
25%
0.0%
2020
2.0%
28
Not Served %
5,601
13%
0.0%
-
CWP %
2015
22%
1,658
10%
618
0%
-
No.
%
2,800
5,566
7,538
0.0%
0%
50%
90%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
13
18
30
65
28
76
106
62
271
122
163
143
60
488
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
20%
0
25%
0
0%
0
0
25%
16
23%
15
0%
0
31
27%
73
20%
54
0%
0
128
28%
137
15%
73
0%
0
210
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
0
25%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
97
21%
20
117
1
141
2
399
22%
88
487
6
584
7
698
25%
175
873
10
1047
12
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
| Photographs
46
m3/day
m3/h
| Photographs
234
973
1,745
10
41
73
47
Year
No.
Growth Rate
Population Distribution
Low Density (%)
%
No.
%
No.
2008
2010
2,514
2.1%
2,621
2.1%
0%
1%
%
No.
-
%
No.
Demand Projections
Total Present Population
Served
% Population Served
Per Capita Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Domestic Demand
LDHA
MDHA
HDHA
CWP
Sub Total
Public Demand
Commercial
Institutional
Industrial
Sub Total Public + Industrial
Total Domestic + Public
Industrial
Losses
Total Average Demand
Maximum Day Demand (1.2)
%
No.
2.1%
1%
3%
10%
48
2,514
2,621
1,112
597
494
37%
1,469
33%
532
50%
1,454
28%
37%
34%
100%
397
17%
274
145
3,971
2.1%
10%
70%
100.0%
3,226
2030
2.1%
73
2020
5%
20%
0.0%
-
Not Served %
9%
0.0%
-
CWP %
2,908
15
0.0%
-
2015
25%
993
50%
1,613
0%
-
No.
%
1,454
1,613
3,971
0.0%
0%
50%
50%
100%
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
125
80
50
36
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
m3/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
7
18
33
6
22
30
19
77
50
89
73
36
248
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
22%
0
27%
0
0%
0
0
24%
8
25%
8
0%
0
16
25%
19
20%
15
0%
0
35
27%
67
17%
42
0%
0
109
m3/day
%
m3/day
m3/day
l/s
m3/day
l/s
0
25%
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
0
0
0
0
0
49
21%
10
59
1
71
1
112
22%
25
136
2
163
2
357
25%
89
446
5
535
6
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
l/c/d
| Photographs
118
272
892
48
m3/h
-
| Photographs
11
37
49
4.1 Methodology
The approach adopted for identifying reliable sources of water supply for each of the
seven selected centres mainly comprised desk studies and field assessments.
Desk studies involved a review of existing reports on previous studies as well as reports on
the water supply situation in Malawi in general and in market centers in particular as
documented by the Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development. The documents
reviewed during the desk study included the Water Resources Master Plan of 1986
(Department of Water / UNDP, 1986), the National and Shire Irrigation Study (NSIS, 1980),
the Integrated Water Resources Management and Water Efficiency Plan (2007), the Water
SWAp (2008) and various reports on ground water data for existing boreholes in the
market centres. Desk studies covered both surface and ground water resources and were
complemented with field visits to the seven selected market centres.
| Photographs
50
As alluded to in the preceding discussion, the Consultant followed the following principal
stages of planning but not limited to:
i. Review of reports on previous studies, assessment of topographical and geological
maps, and analysis of hydrological and hydro-geological information;
ii. Conducting topographic surveys to delineate the extent and characteristics of all land
use types within the designated area of the market centre, and also noting maximum
flood levels within the premises of the market centres.
iii. Review of data on rainfall, stream-flow, evaporation and other climatological data,
and sediment and erosion data.
It should be noted that each source capable of meeting the projected water demand up to
the year 2030 planning horizon was fully investigated and constituted an alternative
option of water supply source for the market centre under study.
Field assessment of existing water supply sources for the seven market centres were
carried out during the month of December in 2009. The assessment entailed observation
of stream flows and boreholes yields, as well as the quality of water resources. Although
the Team did not conduct discharge measurements in the few existing rivers and streams,
professional experience guided the Team to make informed decisions on the suitability of
stream flows to sustain the proposed water demand for the centres. Rough estimates of
borehole yields were made by filling a 20-litre bucket and noting the time taken to do so.
The observed discharge was then compared with the yield recorded during pumping tests.
In most cases, the two values were very similar.
After conducting discharge measurements, water samples were corrected from surface
and ground (boreholes) water sources for physical, chemical, and biological analysis. The
results were compared with standards for domestic water supply set by the World Health
Organization (WHO), Malawi Bureau of Standards (MBS), and the Ministry of Irrigation and
Water Development (MIWD). MIWD Standards are still being improved upon hence the
ones being used are temporary. This comparison was carried out with a view to
determining the suitability of the water for human consumption WHO and Malawi.
Parameters of particular interest were sulphate, iron, fluoride, chloride, hardness and
turbidity (Table 5.1)
| Photographs
51
Unit
WHO
MBS
MIWD
Sulphate
mg/L
400
400
800
Iron
mg/L
Fluoride
mg/L
1.5
Chloride
mg/L
600
600
750
Hardness
(CaCO)
mg/L
500
500
800
Turbidity
NTU
25
Nathenje
Kasiya
| Photographs
Location
Borehole Depth
(m)
Yield (L/s)
Kaduna Village
30.81
1.26
Maxing Clothing
30.81
1.14
Nathenje Catholic
21.35
0.44
Mwalawamkango
48.8
1.0
Nathenje TC
36.6
0.95
Nathenje Tobacco
29.99
3.64
Nathenje Hospital
53.38
2.85
Nathenje
33.55
1.3
Kasiya Police
33.5
0.9
Kasiya Stores
51.85
1.23
Kasiya School
45.75
3.0
Kasiya Unit
61.0
0.81
52
Nsaru
Malosa
Nkando
Ntaja
Nsanama
Nsaru Agriculture
46.36
0.49
Nsaru Tobacco
76.25
Nsaru
45.75
0.5
Nsaru Unit
45.75
0.9
Kalesi
38.13
1.9
Nsaru Station
61.0
0.94
Nsaru
39.0
0.54
Malosa Agr.
Station
42.7
1.1
Malunga Village
34.1
0.43
Agri. TC
31.72
0.38
Thuchila Farm
64.05
1.2
30.5
0.97
Ntaja
28.06
0.84
Ntaja RTC
40.36
1.1
Mahuta
26.23
0.43
Mtimbwilimi
30.5
0.91
Nsanama
37.21
0.5
Nsanama H.C.
43.31
0.68
Mgodi Farm
39.04
1.1
Nsanama
45.75
53
defined as the volume of flow through a full vertical section of the aquifer of lateral unit
width under unit hydraulic in unit time. Hydraulic conductivity (permeability) may be
defined as the volume of flow through unit area of the aquifer under unit gradient in unit
time. Storage Coefficient (storativity) may be defined as the volume of water an aquifer
releases from a vertical storage column per unit surface area per unit change in head.
Nkando, Ntaja and Nsanama comprise alluvial aquifers of the Lake Chilwa-Phalombe Plain.
Generally, alluvial aquifers vary in thickness from 50 to 150 metres (NSIS, 1980); and the
thickness is usually irregular because of the undulating and tilted nature of the basement
floor. Boreholes constructed under the National and Shire Irrigation Study (NSIS, 1980)
showed that alluvial aquifers may have yields higher than 45 litres per second and high
transmissivity values, ranging from 50 m 2/day to 300 m2/day. Permeabilities and
storativities of alluvial aquifers vary from 10-20 m/day and 1*10 -2 to 5*10-2, respectively
(Water Department / UNDP, 1986; NSIS, 1980).
Water Department / UNDP (1986) showed that water quality data for boreholes drilled in
the Precambrian Basement Complex aquifer exhibit low mineralization, implying that the
weathered zone is highly leached of soluble minerals and that ground water was derived
from relatively recent recharge. Ground water in plateau areas is generally classified
predominantly as calcium-bicarbonate type (Water Department / UNDP, 1986). Generally,
the biological quality of the water was noted to suitable for human consumption, with a
very small number of coliform counts.
The main feature of water quality in alluvial aquifers is the extreme heterogeneity in the
extent of mineralization and the chemical composition even over short distances. Where
electrical conductivity values are low (i.e., less than 1000 S/cm), the composition is
usually calcium-bicarbonate type implying recent recharge and processes of solution and
hydrolysis of silicate minerals controlling water quality. More saline ground waters with EC
exceeding 2000 S/cm usually have high concentration of sulphate and/or chloride,
derived from gypsum and common salt (NaCl) respectively.
| Photographs
54
4.4.1 Nathenje
From desk studies and field surveys, three water source options were identified for
Nathenje Market Centre. This was done after a thorough analysis of the available water
resources within easy reach of the market centre. These comprised are surface and ground
water resources.
Discharge records from existing gauging stations on Nathenje River show very low flows
during the dry season, making the surface water option an unacceptable alternative /
option for Nathenje Water Supply using direct abstraction.
There are three dams south of Nathenje Market Centre; and from the Carl Bro report, it is
clear that these dams would not be an ideal source of water supply for the market centre
because of their inadequate storage. This is further compounded by the limited areal
extent of the catchment, which limits inflows into the reservoirs and volume of storage.
55
As stated in the preceding discussion, ground water in this area is suitable for domestic
consumption.
Option 2
This option entails conjunctive use of ground water and surface water resources, i.e.,
abstracting water from Nathenje River and complementing the supply with ground water
from boreholes sited within the fault zone mentioned under Option 1. The abstraction
point along Nathenje River would be identified through detailed surveys, but would be
located upstream of the bridge on M1.
Option 3
This will involve the abstraction of water from two exploratory boreholes located at
8445300 and 593600 on the Nathenje 1:50,000 Map and drilled in a fault zone about 6 km
away from Nathenje towards the City of Lilongwe. The two boreholes were drilled in the
1980s and tested over a 24-hour period at a discharge rate of 5 litres per second, with a
total drawdown of about one metre. However, the Consultant was not able to retrieve
information from the archives at the Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development; but a
member of the consultancy team was involved in the project in the supervision of the
project. The only constraint with using these boreholes as a source of water supply for
| Photographs
56
Nathenje Market Center is the cost of trenching and piping to convey water from the well
field to the market center.
4.4.2 Kasiya
Findings from desk studies and field surveys indicate that Kasiya Market Centre may be
supplied from ground water resources considering that the Mudi River may not sustain
adequate flows during the dry season and that water abstraction from the Bua River may
not be a viable option. The Consultant came to this conclusion after a thorough analysis of
the available water resources within easy reach of the market centre. These comprised are
surface and ground water resources.
57
mineral content than on the western side, it would be advisable to concentrate borehole
siting efforts on the western side of the dambo if water quality problems are going to be
averted.
Option 2
This would entail conjunctive use of surface water abstraction from the Mudi River and the
development of the well field at the location mentioned under Option. Surface water
abstraction would require storage facilities.
Option 1
| Photographs
58
The main option for Nsaru Market Centre is to develop of a well field at 8465700 and
554800 on the 1:50,000 Map of Nsaru.
| Photographs
59
8317300 and 750800 on the 1:50,000 Map of Malosa and conveying it to a central
treatment plant at 8317600 and 751000.
Option 2
This would involve the development of the well field at 8316600 and 753400 on the
1:50,000 Map of Malosa. The major constraint with this option is the associated
operational costs.
| Photographs
60
Option 1
This option will involve the development of a well field at 8238800 and 752800 on the
1:50,000 Map of Nkando.
Option 2
This would involve tapping water from the exiting gravity fed rural piped water scheme.
| Photographs
61
Option 1
The main option for Ntaja Market Centre is to develop a well field at 8554700 and 772300
on the 1:50,000 Map of Ntaja.
Option 2
This would involve the rehabilitation of Kawinga Gravity Fed Rural Piped Water scheme to
complement ground water resources.
| Photographs
62
Option 1
The main option for Nsanama Market Centre is to develop a well field at 8341200 and
769400 on the 1:50,000 Map of Nsanama.
Option 2
This would involve the rehabilitation of Kawinga Gravity Fed Rural Piped Water scheme to
complement ground water resources.
4.4.8
A number of boreholes in Malawi perform below their optimum capacity because of poor
well completion and lack of adherence to recommended borehole development
procedures. It is highly likely that boreholes will yield turbid waters, if wells are backfilled
with filter of smaller media than the installed screen. Also, where very little time is
devoted to well development to clean the aquifer, it takes a long time for the water from
the aquifer to become clear, and encourages silting of wells, a phenomenon that causes
serious damages to pumps. In the light of the above, it is recommended that the
construction of boreholes for the above listed market centers should be done by very
competent and proficient drillers, under close supervision of a professional hydrogeologist.
Lack of adherence to this recommended procedure would result in the construction of low
yielding boreholes.
Malosa Water Supply will get its water from abstracting Likwenu and Lifani Rivers.
| Photographs
63
intake structure;
pumps and pumping stations;
water treatment facilities;
chemical dosing and disinfection / chlorination;
rising and gravity transmission mains;
distribution network;
water storage facilities;
service connections / water points;
access and service roads;
power supply (HT lines);
auxiliary buildings
Other standard design criteria not captured at this stage will be referred to during the
course of the design activities. The design criteria will serve as guidelines for the
subsequent detailed engineering design.
64
pumps will lift the water to service reservoirs. Boreholes will be as far apart as so
that no borehole is located within a zones of influence of another borehole.
5.1.3 Pipelines
In general, the network will be designed as a looped system as much as possible so that it
will be suitable and advantageous in operation. The network analysis will be made using
the WaterCAD software on computer. The WaterCAD will be used that can be linked to the
Town Plan Drawings in order to get a lot of information from the analysis.
65
stage up to 20 years design life. All chemical dosing units will be designed to have
minimum two units with 100% standby capacity.
The filtration capacity of the treatment plants and the type of treatment plant to be used
will be decided depending on the raw water quality of the source to be developed and the
cost of the treatment plant.
If ground water source is going to be used, the water treatment which will be required will
be disinfection and as already indicated all chemical dosing units will be designed to have
minimum two units with 100% standby capacity.
| Photographs
66
UPVC
Steel
DCI/GI
New Pipe *
130
100
110
Existing
110
80
100
Design velocity in the transmission and/or gravity pipelines will be minimum of 0.6 m/s
and maximum of 1.2 m/s for economical operation of the system.
67
Isolating valves, air relief valves and pressure reducing valves shall be provided
wherever they are required in the distribution network and in the rising mains to
facilitate smooth operation and maintenance of the system.
5.1.13.1
The raw water source shall be free from the dangers of chemical pollution. In addition,
intake structures should be free from human and animal interactions and should be
fenced.
5.1.13.2
The bacteriological, chemical and physical qualities of the treated water shall be within
the drinking water standards specified by the Temporary Guidelines used by the
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development of Malawi, Malawi Bureau of Standards
and the World Health Organization Guide Lines for water quality. Non-disinfected
supplies and distribution systems will not be recommended.
Intake structure
50
Dams
50
5-10 *
Treatment structures
50
Dosing pumps
10
| Photographs
68
Reservoir
50
40
UPVC pips
25
Buildings
50
| Photographs
69
| Photographs
70
driving
tapped
will be
ESCOM
Switch gears and control panels shall be installed in all power control points to regulate
power supply to different elements of the water supply system.
5.2.2 Nathenje
20
30
14
6
2020
7
2
2015
2
1
2010
0
0
Based on the maximum day demand for 2030, 6No boreholes equipped with submersible
pumps are proposed for Nathenje market centre
| Photographs
71
5.2.3 Kasiya
| Photographs
20
30
14
4
2020
7
2
2015
2
0
2010
0
0
72
4 No boreholes equipped with submersible pumps have been proposed for Kasiya market
centre
5.2.4 Nsaru
| Photographs
73
20
30
6
2
2020
3
1
2015
1
0
2010
0
0
3 No boreholes equipped with submersible pumps have been proposed for Kasiya market
centre. One borehole will be on standby.
| Photographs
74
5.2.5 Ntaja
20
30
18
6
2020
6
3
2015
2
1
2010
0
0
7No boreholes equipped with submersible pumps have been proposed for Ntaja market
centre. One borehole will be on standby.
| Photographs
75
5.2.6 Nsanama
20
30
13
4
2020
7
2
2015
2
1
2010
0
0
5No boreholes equipped with submersible pumps have been proposed for Ntaja market
centre. One borehole will be on standby.
76
5.2.7 Malosa
| Photographs
77
5.2.8 Nkando
20
30
6
1
2020
2
0
2015
1
0
2010
0
0
2No boreholes equipped with submersible pumps have been proposed for Nkando market
centre. One borehole will be on standby.
78
| Photographs
79
6 Cost Estimates
6.1 Unit Costs
Preliminary estimates for financial requirements for the different options of project
implementation have been prepared based on the costs incurred on similar projects
already implemented by the NWDP and from the Consultants experience.
The following assumptions for unit costs have been taken into account:
Unit construction costs for production intake = US$ 200 per m 3/d. The maximum
day demand has been used in the calculation of preliminary costs for the
production.
Treatment Works cost = US$150 per m3/d.
Storage unit construction cost = US$ 250 per m3
Transmission unit construction cost = US$ 50 per m
Main distribution line unit construction cost = US$ 50 per m
Secondary distribution unit construction cost = US$ 50 per m
Service Connection = US$ 50 per m, although 36% contribution is made by the
customer
| Photographs
80
6.2.1 Nathenje
Table 7.1: Project costs for Option 1 for Nathenje (Groundwater System).
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Preliminary general
LS
1.00
No.
Rate
(US$)
180,000.0
0
15,000.00
6.00
m3
380.00
50.00
Treatment works
m3
1,2
10.00
2,8
50.00
8,4
50.00
50.00
Transmission lines
m
00.00
Distribution lines
m
50.00
Electro-mechanical
equipment
Storage tanks
LS
80,000.00
1.00
m3
380.00
50.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
600.00
80.00
Access roads
50.00
00.00
CWP
No
2,200.00
12.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
LS
35,000.00
1.00
TOTAL
| Photographs
Cost (US$)
180,
000.00
90,
000.00
19,
000.00
12,
500.00
140,
000.00
422,
500.00
80,
000.00
285,
000.00
48,
000.00
10,
000.00
26,
400.00
1,313,
400.00
35,
000.00
1,348,
400.00
81
Table 7.2: The project costs for Option B for Nathenje (Conjunctive Ground water and Surface
Water System)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate (US$)
Cost (US$)
Preliminary general
LS
1.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
Intake construction
m3
1,250.00
200.00
250,000.00
No.
2.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50.00
380.00
19,000.00
Treatment works
m3
1,250.00
150.00
187,500.00
Transmission lines
2,800.00
50.00
140,000.00
Distribution lines
8,450.00
50.00
422,500.00
Electro-mechanical equipment
LS
1.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
Storage tanks
m3
750.00
380.00
285,000.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80.00
600.00
48,000.00
Access roads
400.00
50.00
20,000.00
CWP
No
12.00
2,200.00
26,400.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
1,798,400.00
LS
1.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
1,833,400.00
82
6.2.2 Kasiya
Table 7.3: Cost Estimates for Option 1 for Kasiya ( Ground water system)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
150,000.00
No.
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50
Treatment works
m3
738
10.00
Transmission lines
3,000
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
8,500
50.00
LS
Storage tanks
m3
420
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80
600.00
Access roads
200
CWP
No
10
LS
380.00
60,000.00
50.00
2,200.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
35,000.00
Cost (US$)
150,
000.00
75,
000.00
19,
000.00
7,
380.00
150,
000.00
425,
000.00
60,
000.00
159,
600.00
48,
000.00
10,
000.00
22,
000.00
1,125,
980.00
35,
000.00
1,160,
980.00
83
Table 7.4: Cost Estimates for Option 2 for Kasiya (Surface water system)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate (US$)
Cost (US$)
Preliminary general
LS
1.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
Intake construction
m3
738.00
200.00
147,600.00
No.
2.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50.00
380.00
19,000.00
Treatment works
m3
738.00
150.00
110,700.00
Transmission lines
3,000.00
50.00
150,000.00
Distribution lines
8,500.00
50.00
425,000.00
Electro-mechanical equipment
LS
1.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
Storage tanks
m3
420.00
380.00
159,600.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80.00
600.00
48,000.00
Access roads
200.00
50.00
10,000.00
CWP
No
10.00
2,200.00
22,000.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
1,391,900.00
LS
1.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
1,426,900.00
84
6.2.3 Nsaru
Table 7.5: Cost Estimates for Option 1 for Nsaru (Groundwater system)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
150,000.00
No.
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50
Treatment works
m3
507
10.00
Transmission lines
2,200
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
7,600
50.00
LS
Storage tanks
m3
280
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80
600.00
Access roads
200
CWP
No
2,200.00
LS
35,000.00
380.00
50,000.00
50.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
Cost (US$)
150,
000.00
45,
000.00
19,
000.00
5,
070.00
110,
000.00
380,
000.00
50,
000.00
106,
400.00
48,
000.00
10,
000.00
19,
800.00
943,
270.00
35,
000.00
978,
270.00
85
6.2.4 Ntaja
Table 7.6: Cost Estimates for Option 1 for Ntaja (Groundwater system)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
200,000.00
No.
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50
Treatment works
m3
1,535
10.00
Transmission lines
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
3,000
1
1,700
LS
Storage tanks
m3
850
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
100
600.00
Access roads
200
50.00
CWP
No
14
LS
380.00
50.00
80,000.00
2,200.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
35,000.00
Cost (US$)
200,
000.00
105,
000.00
19,
000.00
15,
350.00
150,
000.00
585,
000.00
80,
000.00
323,
000.00
60,
000.00
10,
000.00
30,
800.00
1,578,
150.00
35,
000.00
1,613,
150.00
86
Table 7.7: Cost Estimates for Ntaja Conjunctive Groundwater and Surface Water System (Option
2)
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
LS
1.00
200,000.00
LS
1.00
100,000.00
No.
2.00
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50.00
380.00
Treatment works
m3
1,535
10.00
Transmission lines
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
3,000
1
1,700
LS
Storage tanks
m3
850
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
100
600.00
Access roads
200
50.00
CWP
No
14
LS
Activity
50.00
80,000.00
2,200.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
35,000.00
Cost (US$)
200,
000.00
100,
000.00
30,
000.00
19,
000.00
15,
350.00
150,
000.00
585,
000.00
80,
000.00
323,
000.00
60,
000.00
10,
000.00
30,
800.00
1,603,
150.00
35,
000.00
1,638,
150.00
87
6.2.5 Nsanama
Table 7.8: Cost Estimates for Ground Water System at Nsanama (Option 1)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
200,000.00
No.
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50
Treatment works
m3
1,117
10.00
Transmission lines
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
2,750
1
1,500
LS
Storage tanks
m3
620
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
100
600.00
Access roads
300
50.00
CWP
No
12
TOTAL
| Photographs
380.00
50.00
80,000.00
2,200.00
Cost (US$)
200,
000.00
75,
000.00
19,
000.00
11,
170.00
137,
500.00
575,
000.00
80,
000.00
235,
600.00
60,
000.00
15,
000.00
26,
400.00
1,434,
670.00
88
Table 7.9: Cost Estimate for Nsanama Conjunctive Ground and surface Water System at
Nsanama
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
LS
1.00
200,000.00
Preliminary general
Connect with Kawinga
Gravity Sch
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
1.00
100,000.00
No.
2.00
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50.00
380.00
Treatment works
m3
1,117
10.00
Transmission lines
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
2,750
1
1,500
LS
Storage tanks
m3
620
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
100
600.00
Access roads
300
50.00
CWP
No
12
LS
50.00
80,000.00
2,200.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
35,000.00
Cost (US$)
200,
000.00
100,
000.00
30,
000.00
19,
000.00
11,
170.00
137,
500.00
575,
000.00
80,
000.00
235,
600.00
60,
000.00
15,
000.00
26,
400.00
1,489,
670.00
35,
000.00
1,524,
670.00
89
6.2.6 Malosa
Table 7.10: Cost Estimates for a Surface Water System at Malosa
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
LS
1.00
250,000.00
Preliminary general
Intake construction
(Lufani and Likwenu
Rivers)
m3
Treatment works
m3
Transmission lines
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
m
LS
1,0
47.00
1,0
47.00
4,5
00.00
16,4
00.00
1.00
200.00
150.00
50.00
50.00
40,000.00
5
Storage tanks
m3
80.00
380.00
1
Auxiliary buildings
m2
Access roads
00.00
1,2
00.00
CWP
No
10.00
2,200.00
LS
1.00
35,000.00
600.00
50.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
Cost (US$)
250,
000.00
209,
400.00
157,
050.00
225,
000.00
820,
000.00
40,
000.00
220,
400.00
60,
000.00
60,
000.00
22,
000.00
2,063,
850.00
35,
000.00
2,098,
850.00
90
6.2.7 Nkando
Table 7.11: Cost Estimates for Nkando Ground Water System (Option 1)
Activity
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Borehole Drilling and
Development
LS
150,000.00
No.
15,000.00
Pumping Sump
m3
50
Treatment works
m3
535
10.00
Transmission lines
1,800
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
7,600
50.00
LS
Storage tanks
m3
300
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80
600.00
Access roads
400
CWP
No
2,200.00
LS
35,000.00
380.00
60,000.00
50.00
SUB TOTAL
Catchment protection
TOTAL
| Photographs
Cost (US$)
150,
000.00
30,
000.00
19,
000.00
5,
350.00
90,
000.00
380,
000.00
60,
000.00
114,
000.00
48,
000.00
20,
000.00
15,
400.00
931,
750.00
35,
000.00
966,
750.00
91
Table 7: 12: Cost Estimates for Nkando Surface Water System (Option 2)
Unit
Quantity
Rate
(US$)
Preliminary general
Connect with Namitambo
Gravity Fed Scheme
LS
1.00
150,000.00
LS
1.00
100,000.00
Treatment works
m3
535
10.00
Transmission lines
1,800
50.00
Distribution lines
Electro-mechanical
equipment
7,600
50.00
LS
Storage tanks
m3
300
380.00
Auxiliary buildings
m2
80
600.00
Access roads
400
CWP
No
Activity
TOTAL
| Photographs
80,000.00
50.00
2,200.00
Cost (US$)
150,
000.00
100,
000.00
5,
350.00
90,
000.00
380,
000.00
80,
000.00
114,
000.00
48,
000.00
20,
000.00
15,
400.00
1,002,
750.00
92
Excavator
Bull dozer
Lorry
Concrete mixers
Vibrator
Grader
Water Booster
These market centres are generally trading areas with some institutional establishment
depended on the area. The common institutional offices available are ADMARC, Health
Centres and schools. Most of these centres are surrounded by agricultural land hence
there are physical limits to outward growth due to agricultural activities in the peripheral
areas. Therefore, the probable major growth will take place in the present centre areas
leading to high population densities hence a need of better services to improve the area.
Due to lack of portable water supply for medium and low density houses, they also use pit
latrines and waste water from the bathrooms and kitchens is diverted to open drainage as
well.
| Photographs
93
Most of the institutions have their own water supply which consist of motorized boreholes
which pump water to elevated tanks. Therefore offices, hotels, boarding schools, big
shops, hospitals and rest houses have waterborne toilets connected to septic tanks.
Whenever consumers need to empty their septic tanks, they either approach the nearest
City Assemblies of Lilongwe, Zomba and Blantyre, or Malawi Housing Corporation or
Department of plant and Vehicle Hire under the Ministry of Transport and Public Works.
94
Forward planning for effective settlement programme for the affected people.
Planning the site and scale to avoid the water supply sources conflicting with
other users e.g. safe yield of rivers.
Taking the consideration of the potential social problem of the population of the
utilising the project facilities, gaining public corporation, incorporating
neighbourhood improvements.
Conforming to land-use planning and strengthening land use controls to regulate
secondary development.
Considering small community systems in water short areas e.g. provision of the
Communal Water Points.
95
Hygienic.
Since each of these market centres have a current population of less than 10,000 people it
is expected that a full EIA will not be required, therefore the impacts will be suitably
addresses through the adequate engineering and construction methods which have been
outlined.
8 Estimated Beneficiaries
8.1 Rationale
Any development project brings change in area which causes economic growth and
poverty reduction. Therefore the rationale behind this project is to provide potable water
supply and sanitation services to the project areas. In return, to ensure that the areas have
healthy people who will be able to contribute to the development welfare as well as that of
the country and achieve economic growth and poverty reduction.
| Photographs
96
9,000
3,993
5,477
11,049
8,286
7,538
3,971
49,314
| Photographs
97
9 References
1. Birdie G.S, Water Supply and Sanitary Engineering, Dhanpat Rai and Sons, 1987
2. Carbro Consultants, Master Study for Urban and Rural Centres Water Supply in
Malawi, 1986
3. Government of Malawi, Integrated Water Resources Management and Water Efficiency Plan
(2007),
4. Government of Malawi, Market Centre and Rural Piped Water Supply and
Sanitation Programme. Guidelines for establishment of Water Users Association
in Malawi, April 2009.
5. Government of Malawi, National Gender Policy, 2000
6. Government of Malawi, National Sanitation Policy. December 2008
7. Government of Malawi, National and Shire Irrigation Study (NSIS, 1980),
8. Government of
December 2000
9. Government of
December 2000
10.Government of
December 2000
11.Government of
December 2000
14.National Statistical
September 2009.
15.National Statistical
2005
16.National Statistical
District, 2006.
17.National Statistical
2006.
18.Twort A.C, Hoather
Edition, 1984.
| Photographs
98
10 Annexes
10.1 Water Quality Results
| Photographs
99
Attached, please find physical, chemical and bacteriological test results of 21 water samples collected from different
water point/source types in Lilongwe (9), Zomba (3), Mulanje (2), Chiradzulu (1) and Machinga (6) districts.
Sampling exercise was conducted by our personnel during the period 10-18th December, 2009.
Of the total water samples, 17 were from groundwater sources (boreholes) and the remainder from surface water
sources (Rivers and water supply taps from gravity fed piped water supply schemes).
Analysis of the parameters requested was conducted in accordance with Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water & Wastewater, 21st Edition.
One of the key elements in the quality control of drinking water is microbiological examination of the water. In the water
samples under review, two bacteria types namely, Faecal coliform and Faecal streptococci were enumerated. The group of
| Photographs
100
coliform organisms as a whole is taken as indicators of faecal pollution. However, the presence of Faecal (thermotolerant)
coliform organisms in particular, provides definite evidence of faecal pollution and that pathogens could be present.
Bacteria values registered in the water samples ranged from 0-1,098 and 0-660 counts per 100ml for Faecal coliform and
Faecal streptococci types of bacteria respectively. The highest values registered on Faecal coliform type of bacteria was as
expected from a surface water source (Munde River) while on Faecal streptococci, it was from a borehole at Kasiya Primary
school.
It is worth noting that as expected, all the surface water sources registered the two bacteria types enumerated and the values
ranged from 32-1,098 and 55-432 counts per 100ml for Faecal coliform and Faecal streptococci types of bacteria respectively.
Five of the total water samples (29.4%) from boreholes registered zero Faecal coliform count per 1O0ml and 12 of the total
samples from boreholes (70.6%) were at the time of sampling delivering water with Faecal coliform values within the
acceptable limits according to the National Standards for drinking water delivered from Boreholes and Shallow Wells
(MS733:2005).
Chemically, water delivered from these water points/sources under review can be said to be ranging from very soft to very
hard and acidic to alkaline. This classification is based on the Total Hardness (CaCO3) and power of hydrogen ion (pH) values
observed which ranged from 3.0-566 mg/I and 6.78-8.04 respectively.
As expected, very soft water was mostly observed being delivered from surface water sources (e.g Majikuta Village water
supply Tap) and very hard water from groundwater sources (e.g. Mkando Mosque). Very soft and acidic water is normally
aggressive to metals and metallic plumbing materials while very hard water tends to be laxative and consumes a lot of soap
before formation of foam. Hard water also tends to form scales in heating elements and people drinking such water for the first
time may find it not palatable.
Iron in the water samples ranged from <0.001-8.61 mg/I. It is worth noting that only two of the total water samples registered
values above 1.0 mg/l and are all located in Traditional Authority (T/A) Khongoni in Lilongwe district. Only one registered a
value above the National Standarqs of 3.0mg/l for drinking water delivered from Boreholes and Shallow Wells (MS733:2005).
The highest Value of Iron (8.61 mg/I) was registered in a surface water source (Munde River). High Iron content tends to be a
nuisance in water for drinking and other domestic purposes because of the bitter taste it imparts, corrosion of plumbing
materials, colouring of white materials and proliferation of bacteria.
| Photographs
101
In general, most of the parameters tested registered values that are within the acceptable limits according to the Malawi
Standards for drinking water delivered from boreholes and shallow wells (MS733:2005).
2. Remark(s)/Recommendation(s)
Please note that whatever remarks that have been made in this report are based on this single set of data collected from
these water samples analysed.
.
Bacteriologically, 16 of the total water points (76.2%) registered bacteria counts of <50 's counts per 100ml
(MS733:2005). Five of the total 17 borehole (29.4%) registered zero Faecal coliform counts per 100ml and as expected, all
the surface water sources registered the two bacteria types enumerated and values ranged from 32-1,098 and 55-432 counts
per 100ml for Faecal coliform and Faecal streptococci types of bacteria respectively.
It is worth noting that of far more serious consequences than the health hazards associated with chemical substances in
drinking water are diseases related to contaminated water that are spread by a biological agent of disease (pathogen). In
general, most of the water points were at the time of sampling delivered water that was not safe for human consumption
without any mode of treatment.
You may therefore wish to consider this element bacteriological quality so seriously if you intend to construct public drinking
water supply networks. It is also worth noting that bacteriological quality standards for drinking water in public drinking water
supply network (MS678:2005) is so stringent compared to that of Boreholes and Shallow Wells (MS733:2005).
.
Chemically, water delivered from these water points/sources under review can be said to be ranging from very soft to
very hard and acidic to alkaline. Very soft water was mostly from gravity fed piped water schemes (e.g. Majikuta village in
Chiradzulu district) and very hard water was observed in groundwater sources (e.g. Mkango mosque in Mulanje district). Note
that hard water tends to consume a lot of soap before foam formation leading to reduction in its cleansing action, and cause
sc,ale in water distribution mains and hot-water heaters.
It is however, important to note that the highest value observed for Total Hardness (566mg/l) is within the National Standards
value of 800 mg/I for water delivered from Boreholes and Shallow Wells.
Iron value was observed to be above the limit of 3.0 mg/I (MS733:2005) in a water sample from a surface water source,
Munde River, located at Kasiya in Lilongwe district. If water from this water source is to be used for human consumption, you
| Photographs
102
may wish to consider reducing the Iron concentration value observed. Reduction in Iron concentration may also lead to
reduction in bacteria content as Iron tends to encourage the proliferation of Iron type of bacteria.
Also attached to this report is our invoice No. 0854417 for the sum of One hundred fifty-one thousand (MK 151,000.00) Malawi
kwacha only. The Charge is for the laboratory services rendered to your Organization.
Please feel free to contact this office should you need more clarification in the laboratory test results provided.
cc:
The Director for Water Resources, Ministry of Water Development, Private Bag 390, Capital City, Lilongwe 3.
The Deputy Director of water Resources (Groundwater), Ministry of Irrigation & Water Development, Private Bag
390, Capital City, Lilongwe 3.
103
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
328
12
48
28
20
660
156
1098
432
78
160
0
102
0
55
0
32
28
20
1
96
0
0
100
20
36
176
28
0
0
| Photographs
614
101,1 2/09
21/12/09
-
615
10/12/09
21/12/09
-
616
10/12/09
21/12/09
-
104
PAULENDO PRIVATE
KABUTHU CDSS
NSALU TRADING
SECONDARY
SCHOOL BOREHOLE,
T/A KABUDULA, NSALU,
BOREHOLE,
T/A KABUDULA,
NSALU
CENTRE BOREHOLE,
T/A KABUDULA,
NSALU,
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (\-IS/em at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mq/l
7.76
350
207
7.75
381
211
9.94
340
204
14
134
19
5.9
0.0030.20
12
148
23
7.3
0.006
0.16
0.00
154
22
8.2
<0.001
0.54
12.9
1.2
34
13.6
<0.001
-
20.1
2.6
41
0.108
-
20.9
1.1
26
15.3
0.152
-
142
141
22
2.0
<0.01
128
126
34
2.0
<0.01
618
10/12/09
21/12/09
-
619
10/12/09
21/12/09
-
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
140
133
42
4.0
2.0
9.7
LAB No.
DATE SAMPLED
DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED
WATER RESOURCE UNIT
| Photographs
617
10/12/09
21/12/09
-
105
KASIYA PRIMARYSCHOOL
BOREHOLE,
T/A KHONGONI,
KASIY A,
KASIYA TRADING
CENTRE BOREHOLE,
T/A KHONGONI,
KASIY A,
MUNDE RIVER,
AT KASIYA TC
ROAD BRIDGE,
KASIY A,
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (uS/em at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mq/I
7.87
1202
640
7.70
618
302
7.33
588
326
29
79
37
40
208
24
12
114
26
5.7
340
0.005
0.31
0.406
0.10
111
0.021
<0.01
28
10.6
119
29.2
1.036
-
21
3.2
72
16.5
0.047
-
22.7
0.70
60
12
8.61
-
419
113
46
4.0
2.0
248
237
40
<0.01
<0.01
214
113
17
24
26
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
LAB No.
DATE SAMPLED
DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED
WATER RESOURCE UNIT
MAP SHEET/GRID REF.
| Photographs
620
.11/12/09
21/12/09
622
11/12/09
21/12/09
621
11/12/09
21/12/09
-
106
LlKWENU RIVER,
MALOSA GRAVITY FED
WATER SUPPLY
INTAKE,
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
SAMBAISA PRIMARY
SCHOOL BOREHOLE,
T/A MALENGA
ZOMBA DISTRICT
ZOMBA DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (!-IS/em at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mQII
MALOSA MOSQUE
WATER SUPPLY
TAP,
T/A MALENGA,
MALOSA,
ZOMBA DISTRICT
7.54
56
35
6.78
129
78
7.28
52
29
0.00
12
9.0
2.3
0.008
0.43
0.00
48
12
4.0
0.021
0.27
0.00
8.0
8.2
3.4
0.048
0.46
6.8
1.2
2.8
0.9
0.194
-
9.3
2.1
8.2
5.3
0.011
-
5.2
1.2
3.4
0.60
0.075
-
11
10
9
2.0
<0.01
42
39
16
1.8
<0.01
11
7.0
5.0
1.0
<0.01
'
623
12/12/09
21/12/09
-
624
12/12/09
21/12/09
625
12/12/09
21/12/09
107
MKANDO MOSQUE
THUCHIRA POST
MAJIKUTA VILLAGE
BOREHOLE,
MKANDO TC,
T/A JUMA,
OFFICE BOREHOLE,
MKANDO TC,
T/A JUMA,
MULANJE DISTRICT
MULANJE DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (uS/em at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mQ/1
7.25
1570
770
7.68
934
480
6.97
18
11
13
617
124
21.4
0.053
0.66
12
452
36.1
14.9
0.458
0.70
0.00
2.0
3.0
2.8
0.028
<0.01
86
1.6
146
49
<0.001
29
1.5
120
23.4
0.085
2.1
0.20
0.9
0.3
0.025
566
527
19
2.0
<0.01
396
390
23
1.0
<0.01
3.0
1.6
3.0
2.0
<0.01
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
| Photographs
108
.......
626
13/12/09
21/12/09
-
627
13/12/09
21/12/09
-
NTAJA HEALTH
BATA AT NTAJA
CENTRE BOREHOLE,
T/A LlWONDE,
MACHINGA DISTRICT
TRADING CENTRE
BOREHOLE,
T/A LlWONDE,
DATE SAMPLED
DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED
WATER RESOURCE UNIT
MAP SHEET/GRID REF.
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
MACHINGA DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (j.JS/cm at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mQ/1
628 /
13/12/09
21/12/09
-
7.81
428
230
AGRICULTURE (RDP)
BOREHOLE,
T/A LlWONDE,
NT AJA,
MACHINGA DISTRICT
6.82
360
,7.69
326
200
187
10
132
18
3.9
0.775
0.39
6.0
204
22
3.5
0.399
0.57
0.00
156
32
2.7
0.993
0.49
14.2
1.3
48
15
0.056
-
20.6
2.8
30
13.6
<0.001
-
181
177
21
1.2
<0.01
131
128
24
1.3
<0.01
10.9
2.1
38
9.7
0.140
135
125
32
2.0
<0.01
| Photographs
109
LAB No,
DATE SAMPLED
DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED
WATER RESOURCE UNIT
629
13/12/09
21/12/09
-
630
13/12/09
21/12/09
-
631
13/12/09
21/12/09
NSANAMA CDSS
NSANAMA MOSQUE
MGODI FARM
BOREHOLE,
T/A NSANAMA,
NSANAMA,
BOREHOLE
AT NSANAMA TC,
T/A NSANAMA,
BOREHOLE,
T/A NSANAMA,
NSANAMA,
MACHINGA DISTRICT
MACHINGA DISTRICT
MACHINGA DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (IJS/cm at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mg/I
7.73
540
290
8.04
805
426
,7.41
425
244
4.0
270
26
2.8
0.013
0.38
9.0
320
62
9.5
0.050
0.62
4.0
164
37
5.5
0.045
0.47
20.5
2.6
59
20
0.008
-
42.4
1.4
98
15,3
0.158
26
2.7
34
13.7
0.364
-
230
228
26
1.8
<0.01
277
32
2.0
<0.01
142
141
37
2.0
<0.01
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
308
| Photographs
110
LAB No.
DATE SAMPLED
DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED
WATER RESOURCE UNIT
MAP SHEET/GRID REF.
640
18/12/09
21/12/09
-
641
18/12/09
21/12/09
-
642
18/12/09
21/12/09
-
MWATIBU PRIMARY
RURAL HOUSING
MAYE VILLAGE
SCHool BOREHOLE,
T/A CHADZA,
NATHENJE,
OFFICE BOREHOLE,
T/A CHADZA,
NA THENJE,
BOREHOLE,
T/A CHADZA,
NATHENJE,
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
LILONGWE DISTRICT
pH Value
CONDUCTIVITY (j.JS/cm at 25C)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS, mQ/I
7.65
466
237
7.68
840
7,62
750
426
389
4.0
220
26
7.1
0.165
0.16
12
384
46
10.3
0.298
0.28
2.0
354
44
10.7
0.024
0.34
16.8
1.5
43
21.4
0.120
30.2
2.7
102
21.4
0.067
32
2.3
88
19
0.082
-
195
187
11
3.5
2.0
343
335
15
6.0
4.0
298
293
17
<0.01
<0.01
SOURCE IDENTITY/LOCATION
| Photographs
111
Chemical
dosing
unit
Pumping
Main
Clear
water
Reservoir
Distributio
n Network
Reservoir
Borehole
s
| Photographs
112
Elevated
tank
Chemical
dosing
unit
Dosing Chamber
Compressor &
back wash
pump house
Pressure filters
Sedi,
basin
Floating river
Intake River
Pumping
Main
Clear
water
Reservoir
Raw
water
pumping
station
| Photographs
113
| Photographs
114
DAY/
TIME
ACTIVITY
PARTICIPANTS
VENUE
DATE
Monday
07.30
07/12/09
09:00
AfDB
Mission Team2
Tikwere
House
City Centre
CardNo and Local Consultants
Chapita
House
09.00
08/12/09
Capital Hill
Tikwere
House
Lilongwe
13:00
Wednesda
y
09/12/09
Lilongwe
District
Thursday
Lilongwe
District
10/10/09
1
2
| Photographs
115
DAY/
TIME
ACTIVITY
PARTICIPANTS
VENUE
DATE
Friday
11/12/09
Machinga &
Zomba
District
Mulanje
District
Machinga
District
Travelling
back to LL
15.00
Saturday
12/12/09
Sunday
13/12/09
Monday
14/12/09
Tuesday
Arrive in Lilongwe
15/12/09
| Photographs
116
DAY/
TIME
ACTIVITY
9.00
PARTICIPANTS
VENUE
DATE
Wednesda
y
Lilongwe
Lilongwe
Lilongwe
16/12/09
Thursday
17/12/09
Friday
18/12/09
Saturday
Lilongwe
19/12/09
| Photographs
117
NAME
DESIGNATION/LOCATION
1.
Project Coodinator
NWDP, Lilongwe.
2.
Mr. Mikuwa
Chief
Water
Resources
Officer, Ministry of Irrigation
and
Water
Development,
Lilongwe
3.
Mr. P. Mleta
Chief
Hydrogeologist,
Ministry of Irrigation and
Water
Development,
Lilongwe
4.
Mr. E. Chiundira
Hydrologist,
Ministry
of
Irrigation
and
Water
Development, Lilongwe
5.
6.
7.
Mr. G. Segeme
8.
Mr. S. Dzinkambani
Engineer,
Central
Region
Water Board, Lilongwe.
9.
Mr. M. Saulosi
10.
Mr. B. Mwabutwa
11.
District
Commissioner,
Lilongwe District Assembly,
Lilongwe
12
Mrs. R. Kalonga
13.
Health
Area
Manager,
Nathenje, Lilongwe.
| Photographs
(ADB),
DATE
118
14.
MISO/Ag.
Director
of
Administration,
Machinga
District Assembly, Machinga
15.
16.
17.
Mr. S. Gondwe
Environmental Development
Officer,
Zomba
District
Assembly, Zomba
18.
Mr. J. Monjeza
19.
Mr. G. Mkwanda
20.
Mr. L. Kumwenda
21.
22.
Mr. J. Kumwenda
23.
Mr. Kantukule
Hydrologist,
Ministry
of
Irrigation
and
Water
Development, Lilongwe
24.
Mr. R. Kampala
25.
Mr. B. Nyirenda
26.
Mr. M. Mpasa
Director
of
Sanitation,
Ministry of Irrigation and
Water
Development,
Lilongwe
| Photographs
119
13 Photographs
stream
| Photographs
120
Market Centre
| Photographs
121
| Photographs
122