Professional Documents
Culture Documents
So whats to be done?
There are two actions that all mines
can take to initiate optimisation, improve
productivity and reduce costs in the
backfill system in a rational manner.
The first action is to assign one
person to have overall responsibility
for the backfill system. The key
performance indicators (KPIs) are both
the quantity and quality of the fill placed
underground. Most commonly, this is
a superintendent level management
position who is directly responsible
for all underground backfill activities.
Where management roles are split on a
mine site by surface and underground,
that person also has a leadership role
to assist the other managers. The role
is a coordinating function between
processing, mine planning and operations,
15
UNDERGROUND
and geomechanics. At most mine sites,
however, backfill is a technically complex
system and an engineer is required for this
role.
The second action is to initiate a
backfill system audit. Ideally this should
be a review of the current backfill system
against the backfill management plan.
However, many mines do not have such
a document and the audit then serves
to provide a systematic review that will
initiate this plan.
Tony Grice
AMC Consultants Pty Ltd
Mine Fill 2014 Symposium Chair
MINEFILL
Dr David Stone
Minefill Services, Inc., USA
The evolution of paste backfills
Dr Martyn Bloss
Olympic Dam BHP Billiton, Australia
An operational perspective of mine
backfill
Dr Ed Thomas
Mine Fill Specialist Consultant, Australia
The Mine Fill Symposium series
conception through to middle age
www.minefill2014.com
16
Earlybird
registration
ends 7 April
2014