Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plan establish objectives and make plans (analyze your organization's situation, establish your overall
objectives and set your interim targets, and develop plans to achieve them).
Do implement your plans (do what you planned do).
Pag 1/13
Check measure your results (measure/monitor how far your actual achievements meet your planned
objectives).
Act correct and improve your plans and how you put them into practice (correct and learn from your mistakes to
improve your plans in order to achieve better results next time).
Benefits
This section explains how ISO management system standards put state-of-the-art practices within
the reach of all organization.
In a very small organization, there may be no "system", just "our way of doing things", and "our way" is
probably not written down, but all in the head of the manager or owner.
The larger the organization, and the more people involved, the more the likelihood that there are written
procedures, instructions, forms or records. These help ensure that everyone is not just "doing his or her own
thing", and that the organization goes about its business in an orderly and structured way. This means that
time, money and other resources are utilized efficiently.
To be really efficient and effective, the organization can manage its way of doing things by
systemizing it. This ensures that nothing important is left out and that everyone is clear about who is
responsible for doing what, when, how, why and where.
Large organizations, or ones with complicated processes, could not function well without management
systems. Companies in such fields as aerospace, automobiles, defence, or health care devices have been
operating management systems for years.
ISO's management system standards make this good management practice available to organizations of
all sizes, in all sectors, everywhere in the world.
Pag 2/13
An EMS meeting the requirements of ISO 14001:2004 is a management tool enabling an organization of any
size or type to:
identify and control the environmental impact of its activities, products or services, and to
implement a systematic approach to setting environmental objectives and targets, to achieving these
and to demonstrating that they have been achieved.
How it works
ISO 14001:2004 does not specify levels of environmental performance. If it specified levels of environmental
performance, they would have to be specific to each business activity and this would require a specific EMS
standard for each business. That is not the intention.
ISO has many other standards dealing with specific environmental issues. The intention of ISO 14001:2004
is to provide a framework for a holistic, strategic approach to the organization's environmental policy,
plans and actions.
ISO 14001:2004 gives the generic requirements for an environmental management system. The underlying
philosophy is that whatever the organization's activity, the requirements of an effective EMS are the same.
This has the effect of establishing a common reference for communicating about environmental
management issues between organizations and their customers, regulators, the public and other
stakeholders.
Because ISO 14001:2004 does not lay down levels of environmental performance, the standard can to be
implemented by a wide variety of organizations, whatever their current level of environmental maturity.
However, a commitment to compliance with applicable environmental legislation and regulations is
required, along with a commitment to continual improvement for which the EMS provides the framework.
The EMS standards
ISO 14004:2004 provides guidelines on the elements of an environmental management system and its
implementation, and discusses principal issues involved.
ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for such an environmental management system. Fulfilling
these requirements demands objective evidence which can be audited to demonstrate that the
environmental management system is operating effectively in conformity to the standard.
What can be achieved
ISO 14001:2004 is a tool that can be used to meet internal objectives:
provide assurance to management that it is in control of the organizational processes and activities
having an impact on the environment
assure employees that they are working for an environmentally responsible organization.
Pag 3/13
support the organization's claims and communication about its own environmental policies, plans and
actions
Pag 4/13
The importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)to economies around the world is beyond
dispute. Surveys have shown that, on a global basis, more than 90 % of all businesses are SMEs.
Experience shows that SMEs can implement an effective EMS and can realize a variety of benefits from
doing so. However, EMS implementation in smaller enterprises can present significant challenges. An SME
Task Group at ISO has developed recommendations to change that perception, and make it easier for
SMEs to benefit from implementing an EMS based on ISO 14001:2000.
Taking the first steps
This article from ISO Management Systems magazine explains clearly how an SME can implement an
environmental management system so that the process is not a series of hurdles, but rather a set of practical
steps towards raising environmental and business performance.
Pag 5/13
ISO/TR 14062, Environmental management - Integrating environmental aspects into product design
and development, enables organizations to identify the likely effects on the environment of their future
products and make effective decisions during the design and development stages to improve their
environmental performance.
Fourthly, ISO/TC 207 is helping to meet the new challenge of climate change by developing the new ISO
14064 standard for greenhouse gas verification and accounting.
Certification
Certification is not a requirement of any of ISO's management system standards. This section
provides a basic understanding of what certification and related terms mean.
Certification, registration and accreditation
In the context of ISO 9001:2000 or ISO 14001:2004, certification refers to the issuing of written assurance
(the certificate) by an independent external body that it has audited a management system and verified that it
conforms to the requirements specified in the standard.
Registration means that the auditing body then records the certification in its client register. So, the
organizations management system has been both certified and registered.
Therefore, in the ISO 9001:2000 or ISO 14001:2004 context, the difference between the two terms is not
significant and both are acceptable for general use. Certification is the term most widely used
worldwide, although registration is often preferred in North America, and the two are used
interchangeably.
On the contrary, using accreditation as an interchangeable alternative for certification or registration is a
mistake, because it means something different.
Pag 6/13
In the ISO 9001:2000 or ISO 14001:2004 context, accreditation refers to the formal recognition by a
specialized body an accreditation body that a certification body is competent to carry out ISO
9001:2000 or ISO 14001:2004 certification in specified business sectors.
In simple terms, accreditation is like certification of the certification body. Certificates issued by accredited
certification bodies may be perceived on the market as having increased credibility.
See ISO/IEC 17000:2004, Conformity assessment - Vocabulary and general principles.
Pag 7/13
Conformity assessment
The first part of this section gives a detailed overview to answer such questions as what is conformity
assessment, what does it imply, how does it work and what exactly do the various terms mean. Explanations
are given to help both companies beginning to explore the possibility of obtaining certification for themselves
or their products. and customers who are seeking clarification of the various certification claims they
encounter.
A further part gives information on the objectives, structure and workings of CASCO, the ISO Committee on
conformity assessment, which has been actively addressing questions of conformity assessment since it was
founded in 1970. A link to the working area (password-protected) of CASCO members is included.
Finally, information is given on the various publications, press releases, communiqus and workshops which
directly result from CASCO's work or are related to ISO's activities in conformity assessment.
Inspecting the manufacturing process of a product to ensure that it is manufactured in a safe manner and
according to regulations (e.g. fire extinguishers).
Pag 8/13
Pag 9/13
We can therefore say that conformity assessment is a series of three functions (functional approach) that
satisfy a need or a demand for demonstration that specified requirements are fulfilled. These three functions
are:
1.
Selection
2.
Determination
3.
Such determination adds credibility to claims that specified requirements are fulfilled, giving users greater
confidence in such claims. ISO standards are used as the specified requirements.
Conformity assessment may be applied to products which includes services, process and systems for
example management systems.
Pag 11/13
A listing of all CASCO documents (referred to collectively as the CASCO toolbox) is available under the
section Publications and Resources.
Accreditation
Accreditation is the procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that a body or person
is competent to carry out specific tasks.
In relation to management systems, an accreditation body will evaluate the competence of a certification
body to perform the certifications for which it wishes to be accredited. Once accredited, this indicates to the
client of the certification body that its competence to do the certifications has been independently confirmed.
Accreditation of testing laboratories, product certification and inspection bodies is also carried out. This again
is independent verification that they are competent to perform the activities for which they are accredited.
Some conformity assessment bodies may wish to distinguish themselves from their competitors by having an
impartial evaluation of their competence by an accreditation body based on internationally-recognized
criteria. These criteria are contained in ISO/IEC 17011 Conformity assessment - General requirements for
accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies. These conformity assessment bodies are
then said to be accredited.
Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRA's)
The primary objective of conformity assessment is to give its users confidence that requirements applicable
to products, services, systems, processes and materials have been met. One of the reasons why
internationally-traded goods and services are subject to repeated conformity assessment controls is a lack of
confidence by users of conformity assessment in one country regarding the competence of bodies carrying
out conformity assessment activities in other countries. Therefore, measures are needed to increase the
confidence of both private and public sector purchasers, and of regulators, in the work of conformity
assessment bodies and accreditation bodies - particularly those in other countries.
Such confidence can be achieved through cross-border cooperation among conformity assessment bodies
and also among accreditation bodies. This cooperation is formalized in what are known as Mutual
Recognition Agreements/Arrangements (MRAs) whereby the parties involved agree to recognize the results
of each other's testing, inspection, certification or accreditation. MRAs can be an important step towards
reducing the multiple conformity assessment that products, services, systems, processes and materials may
need to undergo, especially when they are traded across borders. Since MRAs facilitate the acceptance of
goods and services everywhere on the basis of a single assessment in one country, they contribute to the
efficiency of the international trading system to the benefit of suppliers and customers alike.
ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002 provides an introduction to the development, issuance and operation of
arrangements for the recognition and acceptance of results produced by bodies undertaking similar
conformity assessment and related activities.
Supplier's declaration of conformity (SDoC)
Pag 12/13
By making a self-declaration of conformity, a supplier organization avoids the costs of third-party assessment
but commits that they do in fact meet the criteria and should be able to demonstrate this should they be so
requested. A supplier may decide to take this option if it believes that it enjoys a sufficiently high market
reputation for it to dispense with independent confirmation of conformity. However, a supplier's declaration
may not be appropriate in all cases, particularly where the health, safety or environmental risks of the
product concerned are high. A self-declaration does not exempt the supplier from its responsibility to meet
relevant regulations - for example, in relation to product liability - and such declarations generally need to be
accompanied by effective post-market surveillance.
ISO/IEC 17050 specifies the general criteria for a supplier's declaration of conformity in relation to
International Standards.
Related information
Related links
Pag 13/13