Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doi: 10.1093/afraf/ads065
The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved
Advance Access Publication 5 December 2012
ABSTRACT
Most analyses of Chinas renewed engagement with Africa treat China as
the driving force, and little recognition is given to the role of African
agency, especially beyond the level of state elites. This article investigates
the extent of African agency in engagements with China and argues that
at various levels African actors have negotiated, shaped, and even driven
Chinese engagements in important ways. Suggesting a theoretical framework that captures agency both within and beyond the state, the article
provides an empirical analysis of African agency rst by showing how elements of the Angolan state created a hybrid set of institutions to broker
Chinese investment projects, and second by discussing how African
social actors have inuenced and derived benets from the activities of
Chinese migrants in Ghana and Nigeria. While both cases demonstrate
African agency, the ability of African actors to exercise such agency is
highly uneven, placing African politics at the heart of any understanding
of ChinaAfrica relations.
CHINAS RESURGENT ROLE IN AFRICA IS OFTEN presented as a relationship in which Chinese actors dominate the agenda and act in coordinated
ways.1 The ipside is that African actors are treated as passive and lacking
agency. Yet recent moves by the Sata government in Zambia to double
mining royalties highlight how African states are acting to leverage benets
from Chinese investment.2 This article explores the role of African agency
in shaping the dynamics and outcomes of Chinas renewed engagement
*Giles Mohan (g.mohan@open.ac.uk) is Professor of International Development and Ben
Lampert (b.lampert@open.ac.uk) is a Research Fellow in the Development Policy and
Practice Group at The Open University. The research for this article was conducted within
two ESRC-funded projects (RES-062-23-0487 and RES 062-23-1893). The authors are
grateful to the editors and three anonymous referees for helpful comments on previous
drafts.
1. See Ted Fishman, China, Inc.: How the rise of the next superpower challenges America and
the world (Simon and Schuster, London, 2005); Joshua Ramo, The Beijing Consensus: Notes
on the new physics of Chinese power (The Foreign Policy Centre, London, 2004).
2. Andrew England, Zambia to double mine royalties, The Financial Times, 11 November
2011, <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5a64a96c-0c8c-11e1-88c6-00144feabdc0.html> (4 October
2012).
92
93
3. Chris Alden and Daniel Large, Chinas exceptionalism and the challenges of delivering
difference in Africa, Journal of Contemporary China 20, 68 (2011), pp. 2138; Daniel Large,
Chinas Sudan engagement: changing northern and southern political trajectories in peace
and war, The China Quarterly 199 (September 2009), pp. 61026.
4. For example, Pdraig Carmody, Godfrey Hampwaye, and Enock Sakala, Globalisation
and the rise of the state? Chinese geogovernance in Zambia, New Political Economy 17, 2
(2012), pp. 20929; Sanusha Naidu, Balancing a strategic partnership? South AfricaChina
Relations in Kweku Ampiah and Sanusha Naidu (eds), Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon?
Africa and China (University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Scottsville, 2008), pp. 167219.
with the continent. While not crudely reversing the analytical lens, we
suggest that African actors also exercise agency outside the connes of the
state, even as these actions are shaped by and in turn shape processes of
state formation and function.
The rst section of this article reviews existing political analyses of
ChinaAfrica relations and shows how these treat China as the dominant
force and acknowledge little African agency beyond that located in the
state. The following section reinserts African agency and advances a
conceptual framework for understanding agency both within and
beyond the state. We then investigate African agency by focusing on
Chinese state investments in Angola, and on Chinese migrants in Ghana
and Nigeria. It is argued that, at a variety of levels, African actors have
negotiated and even shaped Chinese engagements in important ways
and in so doing have carved out more opportunities than is often recognized for their own benet and advancement. However, the ability of
African actors to exercise such agency is highly uneven and can have as
much to do with African politics as it does with the politics of China
Africa relations.
94
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
5. Chris Alden, China in Africa (Zed Books, London, 2007); Denis Tull, Chinas engagement in Africa: scope, signicance and consequences, Journal of Modern African Studies 44,
3 (2006), pp. 45979; Ian Taylor, The International Relations of Sub-Saharan Africa
(Continuum, London, 2010).
6. Dan Haglund, Regulating FDI in weak African states: a case study of Chinese copper
mining in Zambia, Journal of Modern African Studies 46, 4 (2008), pp. 54775; see also
Oliver Hensengerth, Interaction of Chinese Institutions with Host Governments in Dam
Construction: The Bui Dam in Ghana (German Development Institute, Bonn, 2011).
7. Large, Chinas Sudan engagement, p. 613.
8. Pdraig Carmody and Ian Taylor, Flexigemony and force in Chinas geoeconomic
strategy in Africa: Sudan and Zambia compared, Geopolitics 15, 3 (2010), pp. 496515,
p. 497.
9. Jonathan Holslag, China and the coups: coping with political instability in Africa,
African Affairs 110, 440 (2011), pp. 36786. This is echoed in Alden and Larges discussion
of Chinas adaptive impulse, in Chinas exceptionalism, p. 36.
Taylor have all called for a focus on the African state when analysing
Chinas impacts on Africa.5
From this inter-state focus a number of studies usefully highlight relational political dynamics. For example, Dan Haglunds work on Zambia
focuses on the interface between Chinese investors and local regulatory
institutions, or what he terms political embeddedness.6 Likewise Daniel
Larges series of studies on Sudan is based on the premise that Chinas
involvement has developed within, inuenced and itself been affected
by Sudanese politics since 1989.7 Beyond individual cases, Pdraig
Carmody and Ian Taylor use the term exigemony to capture the more
dynamic interactions between China and a differentiated landscape of
African politics. For them exigemony denotes how Chinese actors
adapt their strategies to suit the particular histories and geographies of the
African states with which they engage.8 While useful in examining the
elite nature of these processes, the exi- prex is about Chinas hegemonic intent rather than the agency of African actors, even if this is implicit in the notion of particular histories and geographies.
This tendency to acknowledge African agency but then focus largely on
the exibility of the Chinese also appears in studies that rightly stress the
pragmatism of the Chinese. Jonathan Holslag sees China operating in a
diffuse mercantilist fashion where the Chinese state directs its economic
actors. However, his useful analysis of Chinas responses to African
coups, by its nature, examines the role of Chinese actors rather than
African agency, beyond the reduction of Africa to an unstable place.9
Even in those studies that attempt to drill down into these bilateral relationships the analysis invariably focuses on state elites. Pdraig Carmody,
Godfrey Hampwaye, and Enock Sakala conclude their study of China
Zambia geogovernance by arguing that the relationship is based on an
(il)liberal bargain between domestic and Chinese political elites, and as
we shall see a similar pattern pervades Chinas relations with Angola.
95
96
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
individuals can reproduce or transform these collective identities, although Wight acknowledges not all agents are equally placed or positioned.17 The third dimension of this framework is the roles that agents
inhabit, although Wight prefers the term positioned practices to reect
the non-normative aspect of this. However, these positioned practices or
agency3 are structural in so far as they refer to properties that persist irrespective of the agents that occupy them, as illustrated for example by
the diplomat. For Wight any invocation of agency requires all three
dimensions; that is, they are co-constituted and can only be analysed
empirically.
Two implications arise from a critical engagement with Wights framework. First, while Wight focuses on actors in social context, he underplays
the conditioning effects of economic relations and fails to recognize that
state agents have to be situated in the context of wider capitalist relations.
Capital is fragmented in such a way that state activity and politics cannot
be homogenized by reducing them to the needs of a unitary capital.18
In terms of Chinas heightened role in Africa, one of the important differentiating factors is the scale and type of Chinese enterprise.19 Much of
the debate has focused on the bundling of Chinese aid, trade, and investment but this relates primarily to the ties between key Chinese ministries,
development banks, and large state-owned enterprises.20 These projects
are often spatially enclaved with relatively few multipliers in the local
economy or deep linkages to local society. By contrast we see private
Chinese TNCs entering to compete for sales and contracts in the local
open market, where they often lack the protection afforded by the tying of
loans to investment. Finally there are independent Chinese entrepreneurs
who have established a diverse array of small and medium-scale enterprises, some dating back to the colonial period.
A second analytical implication of Wights tripartite approach to
agency, especially the social context and roles, is to diversify what we
might mean by political action. Here Tobias Hagmann and Didier
Pclard have sought to understand how local, national and transnational
actors forge and remake the state through processes of negotiation, contestation and bricolage.21 Their analytic of statehood is about the
dynamic and always undetermined process of state (de)construction,
97
98
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
26. Ali Askouri, Chinas investment in Sudan: displacing villages and destroying communities, in Firoze Manji and Stephen Marks (eds), African Perspectives on China in Africa
(Pambazuka Books, London, 2007), pp. 7186; Daniel Large, From non-interference
to constructive engagement? Chinas evolving relations with Sudan in Alden, Large,
and Soares de Oliveira (eds), China Returns to Africa, pp. 27594.
27. Tony Hodges, Angola from Afro-Stalinism to Petro-Diamond Capitalism (James Currey,
Oxford, 2011).
28. Corkin, Uneasy allies.
29. Campos and Vines, Angola and China.
30. Marcus Power, Giles Mohan, and May Tan-Mullins, Chinas Resource Diplomacy in
Africa: Powering development? (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2012).
agency to shape the Chinese engagement to their own national and regional aspirations.26
Angolas post-war economy required huge amounts of social and infrastructural investment and so external nancing was actively sought.27
It was in this context that China, in need of energy resources, offered
Angola a series of oil-backed credit lines with little conditionality.28
Chinas Construction Bank provided the rst funding for infrastructure
development in 2002 and a framework agreement was formally signed in
2003. In March 2004 the rst ExIm Bank US$2 billion nancing package
for public investment projects was approved.
Two additional ExIm loans of US$500 million and US$2 billion were
made in 2007 with the repayment terms increased to 15 years and the
interest rate revised downward.29 A further US$1 billion loan from the
China Development Bank was granted in March 2009 (rising to US$1.5
billion in 2010) with a view to supporting the development of Angolan
agriculture. In the rst ofcial estimate of Chinese credit to Angola, the
Chinese ambassador said in 2011 that US$14.5 billion in credit had been
provided since the end of the war from Chinas three state banks.30
Project proposals identied as priorities by the various Angolan ministries
are put forward to the Grupo de Trabalho Conjunto (GTC, Joint Work
Programme), a committee comprising Angolas Ministry of Finance and
Chinas Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM). Implementation then passes
over to a multi-sectoral technical group, the GAT (Gabinete de apoio
tecnico de gesto da linha de crdito da China, Technical Support Ofce
for the Management of the Chinese Credit Line). For each project put to
tender, the Chinese government proposes three to four Chinese companies, while sectoral ministries manage these public works and ensuring that
sufcient staff are trained. Through these institutional arrangements, the
Angolan government has been able to use Chinese credit to undertake
over 100 projects that correspond to its strategy of prioritizing the (re)construction of key infrastructure.
Additionally, oil-backed loans amounting to as much as US$10 billion
have been provided by a private equity rm based in Hong Kong called
99
100
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
legitimacy and support base in the run-up to elections.38 For their part
the Chinese needed access to oil in an environment where other supplier
states were already dominated by Western oil companies; they were also
seeking new markets for Chinese manufacturers.39 For the Chinese, structures like the GRN and GTC are, as Corkin argues, a way of minimizing
risk since their close surveillance allows Chinese actors to monitor expenditure and delivery in a way that less ring-fenced forms of nancing
could not.40
Such agency therefore profoundly questions a unitary understanding of
the state and also highlights state building as an ongoing process involving
actors within and outside the state. Moreover, Chinese relations with
many African countries are maturing and moving beyond state-to-state
deals, implicating many more actors. So, the need to move beyond statist,
elite dialogues is not simply a theoretical exercise, but one made more
pressing by this growing embeddedness of mutual political and economic ties.
101
43. See also Laurence Marfaing and Alena Thiel, Chinese commodity imports in Ghana
and Senegal: demystifying Chinese business strength in urban West Africa (Working Paper
180, German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, 2011).
44. See also Heidi stb Haugen, Chinese exports to Africa: competition, complementarity and cooperation between micro-level actors, Forum for Development Studies 38, 2 (2011),
pp. 15776.
45. Interview, Chinese factory owner, Lagos, 20 December 2010. This is our interpreters
translation from the Chinese.
46. Deborah Brautigam, Close encounters: Chinese business networks as industrial catalysts in sub-Saharan Africa, African Affairs 102, 408 (2003), pp. 44767.
47. See also Dulue Mbachu, Nigerian resources: changing the playing eld, South African
Journal of International Affairs 13 (2006), pp. 7782.
goods in recent years.43 Indeed, Chinese traders in these countries regularly reported that their greatest competition came not from their
co-nationals but rather from African traders who source goods from
China, the latter seen as having a better understanding of the local
market.44 In the sense of Wights agency2, these African traders are
agents embedded in particular cultural contexts that give them a distinct
commercial advantage.
The forging of connections to China by African traders also appears to
be one of the factors that has encouraged Chinese entrepreneurs and
companies to come to the continent. Respondents from Chinese manufacturing companies that have established outlets and/or factories in
Ghana and Nigeria often remarked that they had rst been alerted to the
West African market by the quantity of orders they received from traders
from the region. For example, a Chinese entrepreneur who came to
Nigeria in 2001 to sell textiles and subsequently established a furniture
factory in Lagos in 2006 recalls, I had a small-scale factory in [China]
and we knew that Nigeria was a large market because Nigerians were
importing from my factory . So that was why I knew that theres a
market in Nigeria. So I came to Nigeria.45
Furthermore, we found that Ghanaian and Nigerian entrepreneurs are
playing a much more direct role in encouraging the Chinese presence by
sourcing not only consumer goods but also partners, workers, and capital
goods from China something that Deborah Brautigam noted in the case
of autoparts manufacturers in south-east Nigeria.46 Among manufacturers
in the two countries, purchasing relatively cheap machinery from China
has become an increasingly important way of maintaining production in
the face of almost prohibitively high costs linked largely to unreliable and
expensive power supplies and limited transport infrastructure.47 Central
to this strategy of taking advantage of more affordable Chinese technology
is recruiting Chinese technicians to oversee installation and train their
local counterparts in operating, maintaining, and repairing the machinery.
For example, a Nigerian engineering component manufacturer reported
that when he replaced his ageing Europe-sourced production lines for half
102
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
103
104
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
105
patron, it was clear that their success depended on African actors in the
form of their local workers. Chinese entrepreneurs often emphasized that
employing African labour was central to their business strategy and sustainability; it was not only seen to be considerably cheaper than bringing
in workers from China, but was also deemed essential to understanding
the local market.
For instance, the two Chinese managers of the Nigeria ofce of a
Chinese quarry machinery manufacturing company argue that beyond the
highly competitive price of their product range, it is their two Nigerian
sales directors that have been key to the rapid success of the outlet.59 The
Chinese managers report that while they had a limited ability to communicate in English, and particularly Nigerian English, the Nigerian sales
directors were able to initiate a strategy of visiting local quarries to talk
directly to the owners and that it was through the personal relationships
they initiated that the rst orders came in. Furthermore, the Nigerian
sales directors built on this by contracting some of the initial cohort of
satised customers to act as sales agents for the company, thereby establishing a wide-reaching marketing network.
While management positions tend to be dominated by Chinese staff,
having at least some locals in these roles is often considered useful, particularly in negotiating the demands of government agencies and ofcials
and in recruiting, managing, and motivating local workers, agents, and
subcontractors.60 In some cases, African staff constitute a signicant proportion of management and/or have become their Chinese bosses closest
and most trusted managers. In one of the Chinese-owned manufacturing
companies we visited in Tema, for example, the factory manager is a
Ghanaian who has worked there since the company was founded some 30
years ago.61 Reporting directly to the Chinese owner, he is the most
senior manager at the company and helps oversee not only the 58 local
staff but also the three Chinese technicians.
As this example suggests, African workers have carved out signicant
opportunities for their own advancement. This is especially apparent in
Golden Telecoms, one of the three major Chinese telecommunication
companies that have entered the Nigerian market since the late 1990s.
Golden Telecoms has explicitly pursued a strategy of recruiting a high
proportion of local staff. Former and current local Golden Telecoms staff
report that as a result of this strategy the company has developed the
106
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
107
66. Dobler, Solidarity, xenophobia; Dirk Kohnert, Are the Chinese in Africa More
Innovative than the Africans? Comparing Chinese and Nigerian entrepreneurial cultures of innovation (GIGA, Hamburg, 2010); Margaret Lee, Uganda and China: unleashing the power of
the dragon in Henning Melber (ed.), China in Africa (Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala,
2007); Lee, Raw encounters; Terence McNamee, Africa in Their Words: A study of Chinese
traders in South Africa, Lesotho, Botswana, Zambia and Angola (Brenthurst Foundation,
Johannesburg, 2012); Cyril Obi, Enter the dragon? Chinese oil companies and resistance in
the Niger Delta, Review of African Political Economy 35, 117 (2008), pp. 41734; Barry
Sautman and Yan Hairong, African perspectives on ChinaAfrica links, The China
Quarterly 199 (September 2009), pp. 72859.
67. For other cases see Dobler, Solidarity, xenophobia; Lee, Raw encounters; Human
Rights Watch, Youll Be Fired If You Refuse: Labor abuses in Zambias Chinese state-owned
copper mines (Human Rights Watch, New York, NY, 2011), <http://www.hrw.org/sites/
default/les/reports/zambia1111ForWebUpload.pdf> (4 October 2012).
68. Isaac Idun-Arkhurst, Ghanas Relations with China (South African Institute of
International Affairs, Johannesburg, 2008); Kohnert, Are the Chinese in Africa More
Innovative; Jing Lui, Contact and identity: the experience of China goods in a Ghanaian
marketplace, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 20, 3 (2010), pp. 184201;
Ndubisi Obiorah, Darrean Kew, and Yusuf Tanko, Peaceful rise and human rights: Chinas
expanding relations with Nigeria in Rotberg (ed.), China into Africa, pp. 27295; Alaba
Ogunsanwo, A tale of two giants: Nigeria and China in Ampiah and Naidu (eds),
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon?, pp. 192207.
69. See also Sola Akinrinade and Olukoya Ogen, Globalization and de-industrialization:
SouthSouth neo-liberalism and the collapse of the Nigerian textile industry, The Global
South 2, 2 (2008), pp. 15970; Mbachu, Nigerian resources; Olukoya Ogen,
Contemporary ChinaNigeria economic relations: Chinese imperialism or SouthSouth
mutual partnership?, China aktuell 3 (2008), pp. 78102; Pat Utomi, China and Nigeria
(Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, 2008).
public debate and even protest.66 Some Ghanaian and Nigerian actors
have taken direct action to regulate the activities of the Chinese and on
occasion have attracted some degree of support from elements of the
state. Such action has in some cases produced tangible effects, disrupting
and/or constraining Chinese enterprise and forcing Chinese actors to
adapt their strategies and activities.67 All of this is especially evident in the
response to Chinese traders and their importation of cheap Chinese consumer goods, which has been one of the most contentious issues related
to the Chinese presence in both Ghana and Nigeria.68
In Nigeria, much of the agitation has focused on the China Town in
Lagos discussed earlier. 69 By the time the complex relocated to Ojota
in 2002, prominent Nigerian manufacturers and the Manufacturers
Association of Nigeria had begun to mobilize against it. They argued that
the importation of cheap and often sub-standard Chinese goods was
fatally undermining local producers. Indeed, this agitation only increased
as the new complex became more popular with Chinese traders and
African consumers alike. They challenged it with all their powers, recalls
a Nigerian closely involved with China Town since its early days. They
did not want the inux of these people because they know they will take
over all their markets. So it was bad What they do is they go to the authorities, right from the presidency to every arms of the government,
108
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
70. Interview, Nigerian associate of China Town complex, Lagos, 16 September 2010.
71. Interviews, Nigerian traders association ofcial and Chinese textile outlet manager,
Kano, 18 December 2010.
72. See also Dobler, Solidarity, xenophobia.
73. Haglund, In it for the long term.
to say look at these people their product is not good, their business is
not right, cross check very well.70 As a result of such calls by the manufacturing lobby, the federal government added a number of goods, such
as textiles and furniture, to its import prohibition list between 2003 and
2004. In late 2005, just nine months after the new China Town was ofcially commissioned by President Obasanjos wife, ofcers of the Nigeria
Customs Service descended upon the complex, seized banned imported
goods and closed it for three months.
The impact of this action was considerable. The vast majority of the
Chinese traders lost most or all of their stock. Some simply went out of
business and returned to China. Many others moved to another country
or attempted to relocate within Nigeria. A good number ed to Kano but
here the local traders association promptly banned foreigners from the
citys famous textiles market and sought to restrict the Chinese to wholesaling at the perimeter.71 For those who remained in the Lagos China
Town, business never recovered. Some traders stopped importing the
banned goods while others continued to bring them in, particularly textiles, but faced the increasingly high costs of settling ofcials. With a
reduced quantity and range of goods on offer, the remaining Chinese
traders complain that the complex has won back few of its old customers.
Such political agency enacted by lower-tier ofcials can clearly modify
Chinese behaviours and is arguably a material gain for these street level
bureaucrats.72 However, Haglunds work on the regulatory weaknesses of
the Zambian state shows that weak local political capacity is a toxic cocktail in which Chinese rms are relatively free to abuse labour and environmental laws.73
While Nigerias manufacturers have enjoyed some success in encouraging the state to disrupt the activities of Chinese traders operating in the
country, less elite groups have gained little state support in their attempts
to contest the Chinese presence. In late 2010, the second in what was
planned to be a nation-wide series of protests was held to challenge the
growing tendency of major international and Nigerian rms to employ
large numbers of foreign workers, particularly from India and China.
Organized by a group of trade unions and civil society organizations, one
of the campaigns main targets was the Nigerian-owned Dangote Group,
which stood accused of employing 3,000 Chinese workers in the construction of its new cement factory, many apparently doing low- and
109
Conclusion
Africa cannot be seen as simply a passive space increasingly subject to
intervention by China. While we must be wary of reversing the analytical
lens too far, reinserting African agency into the dominant discourse of
China-in-Africa reveals Sino-African relationships that are more locally
driven and mediated than is generally recognized. Just as Kobena Mercer
noted that identity only becomes an issue when it is threatened, agency
becomes important where it is denied.78 It is here that academics as interlocutors have to avoid overly structural accounts that deny African agency
and simply produce political nihilism that forecloses a future in which
African agency can be realized in more transformative ways.
African actors have been able to shape these relationships in ways that
advance their own interests and aspirations and/or produce forms of
wider social benet. This agency is found at the individual level, but also
74. Interviews, two male Nigerian leaders of the campaign, Lagos, 30 September and 4
October 2010.
75. BBC News, Aliko Dangote opens Nigerias biggestcement plant, 11 June 2012, <http
://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-18400028> (11 June 2012).
76. Doornbos, Researching African statehood; Wight, They shoot dead horses, p. 133.
77. Lee, Raw encounters; Anthony Baah and Herbert Jauch, Chinese Investments in Africa:
A labour perspective (African Labour Research Network, Namibia, 2009); Power, Mohan,
and Tan-Mullins, Chinas Resource Development.
78. Kobena Mercer, Welcome to the jungle: identity and diversity in postmodern politics
in Jonathan Rutherford (ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (Lawrence and Wishart,
London, 1990).
semi-skilled jobs for which Nigerians could have been found easily.74 The
Dangote Group attracted criticism not only because it proudly claims to
be Nigerias foremost indigenous conglomerate but also because its
owner, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, was, rather ironically, the chairman of the
federal governments National Committee on Job Creation. Despite their
well-publicized public protests appealing to the President and ministers,
the campaigners failed to elicit any government response.
It appears that the Dangote Group has continued unhindered in its
utilization of Chinese labour: Chinese workers were conspicuous at the
recent opening of one of its new cement factories.75 In Doornboss terms,
it would seem that the social demands advanced in this case have been
negated rather than negotiated by state elites, reminding us of Wights assertion that not all agents are equally placed or positioned.76 This can
also be seen in the mixed results African trade unions have had in improving the pay and conditions of local workers in Chinese enterprises, where
the quality of leadership and degree of government support have been key
factors in the effectiveness of organized labour.77
110
AFRICAN AFFAIRS
79. John Lonsdale, Agency in tight corners: narrative and initiative in African history,
Journal of African Cultural Studies 13, 1 (2000), pp. 516.
80. Mirjam de Bruijn, Rijk van Dijk, and Jan-Bart Gewald, Social and historical trajectories of agency in Africa in Patrick Chabal, Ulf Engel, and Leo de Haan (eds), African
Alternatives (Brill, Leiden, 2007), pp. 920.
81. See also Christopher Clapham, Fitting China in, in Alden, Large, and Soares de
Oliveira (eds), China Returns to Africa, pp. 3619.
within more organized civil society activity and within parts of the African
state. While cases of John Lonsdales African agency in tight corners
clearly exist, contexts also emerge in which multiple forms of African
agency work to bring some benets to African development.79 However,
the ability of African actors to express this agency is highly contingent:
the space for African agency varies signicantly, and it is thus neither possible nor wise to homogenize or reify this agency outside of particular
contexts.80
Indeed, the African actors that appear to benet most are often political
and business elites and this might reinforce unaccountable modes of political and economic governance as well as highly uneven distributions of
wealth and power. In terms of scale, Chinese and African elites enter relationships at the local level where discourses of local development are
used to legitimate what are largely private agendas. Likewise at the central
state level small elite nodes provide protection, albeit quite fragile, for
Chinese rms to accumulate and deploy the rhetoric of SouthSouth cooperation to legitimize these essentially narrow interests.81 But as the
cases of resistance demonstrate, there are emerging sites in which these
inequalities are being contested within African societies, and not in
straightforwardly anti-Chinese ways.