Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When the lights flicker for a split second, most people dont read too much into it. It happens
just a fluke. But for one homeowner, who was experiencing ongoing problems for several
weeks straight with lights brightening and dimming when he turned appliances on and off,
there was obviously an underlying problem. In addition, the cable signal on the television
was inconsistent, and the Internet service was dropping on a regular basis. In this Forensic
Casebook, the investigator uncovers the steps leading up to the accident, examining why a
fire broke out in the homes second floor bedroom after a cable technician cut a coaxial
cable.
EMAIL
INSHARE
COMMENTS 10
What is in this article?:
When the lights flicker for a split second, most people dont read too much into it. It
happens just a fluke. But for one homeowner, who was experiencing ongoing
problems for several weeks straight with lights brightening and dimming when he
turned appliances on and off, there was obviously an underlying problem. In
addition, the cable signal on the television was inconsistent, and the Internet service
was dropping on a regular basis.
While trying to identify the source of the issue on his own, the homeowner noticed a
section of coaxial cable on the outside of the house had a melted jacket. At this point,
he called the local electric utility and cable company to file a request for service.
The scene
A lineman for the electric utility, who arrived the next evening, examined the
connections on the pole-mounted transformer. Although it was dark, he noticed
some deterioration on the service drop cable between the electric utility pole and the
house. Because the home was located some distance from the road, the electric utility
was only responsible for the meter, transformer, and wire to the first pole on the
property. In this instance, the electric utility did not own and was not responsible
for the service drop cable. Therefore, the lineman advised the homeowner to get
an electrician out there to check the integrity of the cable. Unfortunately, this
recommendation would prove to be too little, too late.
The fire
A technician from the cable company arrived the following day, at which time the
homeowner showed him the melted jacket on the coaxial cable. After performing
several tests, the technicians supervisor told him to go ahead and cut the coaxial
cable. Once he did, some lights in the house dimmed, others brightened, and a fire
broke out in the second floor master bedroom. Discovering the fire, the son,
accompanied by his mother and father, quickly vacated the house without injury.
They called 911 immediately, and local firefighters were dispatched to extinguish the
fire. The fire left behind damage to the second floor bedrooms as well as smoke and
water damage throughout the house. Although the monetary amount of damage to
the structure and its contents is unknown, the home was ultimately repaired after the
incident.
RELATED
The lawsuit
I was retained as a forensic expert by the homeowners insurance company to
ascertain the cause of the fire. Although the exact failure that caused the fire was not
determined, the electric utility and cable company were named as defendants in the
lawsuit due to evidence that indicated the actions of their employees contributed to
the cause of the fire.
Photo 1. View of the service drop cable showing the severed neutral conductor.
Although it was determined that the fire originated in the master bedroom at the
head of the bed, the exact cause was not determined. The remains of a duplex
receptacle, electric blanket, and radio in the area of origin were examined. However,
extensive damage did not indicate a failure that could have caused the fire.
Examination indicated that the service drop cable to the residence had a severed
neutral, as shown on Photo 1. The failure of the neutral conductor appeared to be
caused by deterioration due to age and possible contact with tree limbs. Examination
of the coaxial cable indicated melted insulation on a bend (Photo 2), indicative of
heat caused by current flowing through the shield.
Photo 2. View of the coaxial cable showing the melted plastic jacket.
Documents produced during the lawsuit included depositions from the lineman and
cable TV technician. The lineman testified that he was dispatched to the house for a
flickering light problem. He was aware that such circumstances could be caused by a
severed neutral conductor and if he had seen any breaks in the wire he would
have de-energized the service cable until repairs were made. This action would have
prevented the fire. However, he arrived after dark and although he saw
deterioration of the cable he did not see any breaks in the neutral.
The cable technician testified that when he measured the voltage on the coax shield,
he got readings of 20V to 35V, which was not normal. He called his supervisor to
discuss the situation and was told to remove the ground connection. After removing
this connection, the voltage measurement increased to 200V on the shield. Realizing
this created an even bigger problem, he reconnected the ground and again called his
supervisor. After another discussion, the technician was directed to cut the coax
(although the reason for this action was not provided).
Theoretically, electrical current flows through all bonding and grounding
connections to return to the electric utility transformer. The lower the resistance
path, the more current will flow. The neutral conductor in the service drop cable
provides the lowest resistive path to the transformer. When the neutral wire in the
service drop cable was severed, electrical current sought other paths to return to the
transformer. Those paths included the ground, through ground rods and a water
pipe, and the cable shield that was bonded to the neutral on the electric utility pole
where the transformer was located. Current flowing through the shield created heat
that caused melting of the jacket. Losing the neutral also eliminated the 0V reference
so that voltage on one line conductor increased while voltage on the other line
conductor decreased. This resulted in the dimming and brightening of lights.
Lessons learned
The case was settled prior to trial, the terms of which were confidential. However,
several lessons can be learned from the sequence of events in this case.
The lineman was aware of the dimming light problem and that it could indicate a
problem with the neutral, but he did not investigate further since the service drop
cable was owned by the homeowner. Although he saw deterioration of the cable, he
testified that if he had visually identified a severed neutral conductor he would have
de-energized the transformer until cable repairs were made, which would have
prevented the fire.
The cable technician testified he was aware that lights dimming and a melted jacket
on the coax were indications of electrical problems. Furthermore, measurements
indicating voltage on the cable shield also indicated an electrical problem. Therefore,
he should have told the homeowner to call an electrician. If he had done so without
cutting the coaxial cable, the fire would not have occurred. It was also noted that the
cable technician violated OSHA requirements by cutting the coax (i.e. working on
energized equipment without wearing personal protective equipment).
EMAIL
INSHARE
COMMENTS 10
What is in this article?: