Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I tried to keep the original sources but often it was not possible due to
Under FAIR use policy of IP we ONLY can use this presentation for our
n been developed based on Six Sigma and other quality materials collected from differen
presentation for our individual or group learning purpose but not for commercial usage
or commercial usages!
Objective/Target of Event
Starting Date
End Date
Team Leader
Team Members
Facilitator
Coach
Process Excludes
MEETING SUMMARY
MEETING INFORMATION
DATE
4/2/2003
PREPARED
Pat
FACILITATOR
Jerry Barron
PLACE
SUMMARY
DECISIONS and
AGREEMENTS
TEAM MEMBERS
Karen
Tom
Helen
Pat
Bob
To present our findings and proposed future states to Dr. Scott and d
eport and prsesentation.
After getting some feedback from Dr. Jerrold, the group has decided to
the design of the system using the budget fomrs that Helen presented
discussed and adjusted to meet the nees of the facility manager
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN
1. Document meeting with area contacts and submit those to Helen
2. Area teams should be sure to meet before next meeting and establish risk considerations for
executive summary.
3. Submit any information that you would like included in the PowerPoint presentation to Tom
before next meeting.
4. The next meeting will be held in the library conference room 101 on April 9th.
ARY
x
x
x
x
BY WHOM?
WHEN?
All
9-Apr
Continuous
Area teams
9-Apr
Area teams
9-Apr
8:30 am
9:00 am
9:30 am
w/ Site Leader
Team Picture
Charter Review - Why are
we here?
Kaizen Overview
Brainstroming
10:00 am
10:30 am
11:00 am
11:30 am
12:00 noon
12:30 pm
1:00 pm
1:30 pm
2:00 pm
2:30 pm
3:00 pm
3:30 pm
4:00 pm
4:30 pm
5:00 pm
Monday
Doing Day
Core Team Sharing
Additional Training as
needed
Prioritize Issues
Brainstorm
Affinity Diagram
Potential Solutions
Lunch
Lunch
Perato
Discovery
VSM As-is
Current State
VSM New
MoM
Weekly Plan
Tuesday
Doing Day
Core Team Sharing
Wednessday
Checking Day
Core Team Sharing
Change Day
Implementing
Try Storming
Validation
Verifying new
Methods
Refining
Lunch
Lunch
Continue Change
Validation
Be prepared to stay
late tonight!
Be prepared to stay
late tonight!
Thursday
Acting Day
Core Team Sharing
Lunch
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:
Goto the 'VSM Template' tab and complete the data boxes
Step 7:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Select CTRL + A
Step 4:
Purchasing
Supplier
Cycle Time
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Operators
100
Stamp
Qty: 6000
Cycle Time
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Operators
100
1200
100
MRP
Trim
Qty: 2500
Cycle Time
100
Cycle Time
100
Up Time (%)
100
Up Time (%)
Yield (%)
100
Yield (%)
# Shifts
100
# Shifts
100
# Operators
# Operators
28000
100
Grind
Polish
Qty: 3200
Cycle Time
100
Cycle Time
100
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Shifts
100
100
# Operators
100
# Operators
1400
100
100
Customer
Takt Time
100
Demand (Units)
100
Frequency
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
15000
Lead Time
Cycle Time
46000
400
Purchasing
Supplier
Cycle Time
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Operators
100
Stamp
Qty: 6000
Cycle Time
100
Cycle Time
100
Up Time (%)
100
Up Time (%)
Yield (%)
100
Yield (%)
# Shifts
100
# Operators
100
# Operators
1200
100
MRP
Trim
Grind
Qty: 2500
Qty: 3200
Cycle Time
100
Cycle Time
100
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Shifts
100
100
# Operators
100
# Operators
28000
100
100
Customer
Takt Time
Demand (Units)
Frequency
Polish
Qty: 3200
Cycle Time
100
100
Up Time (%)
100
Yield (%)
100
# Shifts
100
# Operators
100
1400
15000
100
100
100
100
Lead Time
Cycle Time
46000
400
Production Pull
Production Push
Cycle Time
Change Over Time
Up Time (%)
Yield (%)
100
100
100
# Shifts
100
100
# Operators
100
Data Table
Go See
Emergency Stock
Inventory Withdraw
Operator
Parts Storgae
Qty:
Customer
Process Step A
Inventory
Customer or Supplier
Timeline Elements
Process Step
Transportation
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
LEAD
TIME (s)
VALUE
TIME (s)
0
0
Pareto Analysis
[Herff Jones ]
[Brief Project Description]
[Date]
[Chart Title]
60
100%
50
80%
40
60%
Defects
Cumulative %
30
40%
20
20%
10
[42]
0%
Causes
Vital Few
Useful Many
Labels
Cumulative%
[42]
Cut Off %
# Causes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Glue
Binding
Button
Pressure Applied
Cause # 5
Cause # 6
Cause # 7
Cause # 8
Cause # 9
80%
Defects
Cumulative%
50
30
15
5
3
2
1
1
1
46.3%
74.1%
88.0%
92.6%
95.4%
97.2%
98.1%
99.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Templates by Vertex42.com
As-is
Lead Time
Cycle Time
NEW
46000
400
Differrence
46000
0
400
0
50000
45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Lead Time
As-is
NEW
Differrence
Cycle Time
As-is
NEW
Differrence
Quality Tools
Cause and Effect Diagram
Description
Measurement
Materials
Lab Error
Raw Materials
Analyst
H2O
Improper Calibration
Instructions
Solvent Contamination
Supplier
In lab
Learn More
Exposed Pipe
Tools
Environment
Manpower
Materials
Method
Raw Materials
Analytical Procedure
H2O
Not Followed
City
Calibration
Plant System
Lab Solvent
Contamination
Sampling
Supplier
Iron Tools
Problem Statement
In lab
Dirty Bottles
Iron in Product
Inexperienced Analyst
Materials of Construction
Rusty Pipes
Maintenance
At Reactor
Opening Lines
At Sample Point
Iron Tools
E470
E583
Manpower
Machine
Problem Statement
Iron in Product
Supplier
Input
End User
HRD
HRD
HD Supervirosr
IT Assistants
Vendor
HD Software
Metrics
Response Time
2 Yrs Exp. Of HD Supervisor
ITIL Foundation
99% Availability of HD Software
Process
Output
Resolved TT
Open TT
Log TT
Aanlyse
Troubleshoo
t
Close TT
Metrics
Loging TT < 10 Min
Analysing TT < 2 Min
Assigning Support Engineer TT < 1 Min
P1 Troubleshooting < 2 Hr
P2 Troubleshooting < 8 Hr
P3 Troubleshooting < 16 Hr
P4 Troubleshooting < 5 Business days
P5 Troubleshooting < 30 Business days
Closing TT < 1 Min
Assign
Support
Engineer
Metrics
Resolution or Restoration Time
Workarround / Permanent fix
Customer
End User
Cause
Cause &
& Effect
Effect Matrix
Matrix Linking
Linking
to
to Fishbone
Fishbone and
and SIPOC
SIPOC
Rating importance to Customer (from VOC) --
0 = No Relationship
1 = Minimal Relationship
Relationship
Sl#
3 = Moderate Relationship
9 = Significant
10
Ooutput1 - Great Taste
Change Management
9
1
3
1
1
Those rows with high scores are the ones that indicate important, high-leverage input factors. You can effe
Each of the row needs to be varified again with Pareto Chart too. Then finalize the inputs that
Output3 - Topping
capability
9
1
1
3
1
0
1
9
9
1
Total
135
83
89
79
21
put factors. You can effectively ignore the low scores from further consideration.
nalize the inputs that is more important to take care 1st.
Quality Tools
Flow Chart
Description
Instructions
Receive Order
Start
Text
/ End
Step
Enter Order in
System
Connector
Credit Check
Text
No
Decision
Refuse
Order
OK?
Yes
No
Text
Flowchart
Link
Yes
Check Inventory
Input/
Output
Text
No
Document
OK?
Check Materials
Needed
Yes
Text
OK?
Text
Order Material
Learn More
Order Material
To learn more about other quality tools, visit the ASQ Learn About
Quality web site.
Sl#
Name