Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bo Leckner CTH
CONTENT
A general survey of co-combustion
Judgement on advantages and disadvantages of cocombustion in general, including CFB
The role of CFB
Bo Leckner CTH
DEFINITION
Co-combustion or co-firing is to burn or to convert two or
more fuels together in one boiler system
Bo Leckner CTH
PURPOSE OF CO-COMBUSTION
Spontaneousmany applications in FBC
depending on available fuels and prices
Substitution of fossil fuels ---utilization of
biomass and waste for CO2 reduction
Waste reduction with energy utilization
Bo Leckner CTH
1100
1000
10% biomass
900
20% biomass
Average Europe
800
Reference plant
700
Thermie SR
Thermie Ultimo
600
500
% biomass on LHV
400
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
FOUR SITUATIONS:
Additional fuel
a)
Bo Leckner CTH
Coal
Additional fuel
b)
Ash
Additional fuel
Coal
Ash
Main combustor
Coal
Combustor
Combustor
Steam
Main combustor
Ash
Coal
Additional fuel
c)
d)
a)
Bo Leckner CTH
Bo Leckner CTH
Alholmen, Finland
(Manufacturer: Kvaerner Pulping OY)
Bo Leckner CTH
10
Bo Leckner CTH
11
Bo Leckner CTH
12
Bo Leckner CTH
13
Primary
boiler,
800MWth
Bo Leckner CTH
Co-combustor
100MWth
14
Bo Leckner CTH
15
Bo Leckner CTH
16
2.
3.
4.
Bo Leckner CTH
17
Adiabatic temperature K
Coal
2000
Wood
1500
1000
500
Stoichiometric conditions
Approximate data
0
0
20
40
60
80
Bo Leckner CTH
18
Parameter
Coals
Biofuels
Wastes
Sulphur
Chlorine
Potassium
Other alkali
Alumina, silica
Medium to high
Medium
Medium (bound)
Normal
High
Low
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low
Low to high
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low
Low to normal
High
Bo Leckner CTH
19
Synergy effects
Fuel property
Effect
SO2 emissions
Ca
dioxins + furans
Cl
Cu
Na+K
Zn
agglomeration of bed
material
fate of trace elements
Si
Bo Leckner CTH
Trace elements
20
Options
A judicious choice of fuel combinations may have
advantages:
Bo Leckner CTH
21
Presence of chlorine
Inadequate combustion conditions
Insufficient residence time above 800 oC
Presence of catalyst surfaces at 250-450 oC
Bo Leckner CTH
22
(2)
Bo Leckner CTH
23
Bo Leckner CTH
24
Bo Leckner CTH
25
Bo Leckner CTH
26
Ash behaviour
Equilibrium calculations give an idea of the behaviour of
some ash components (potassium in straw in this
example) (From Nielsen et al., 2000)
Bo Leckner CTH
27
Bo Leckner CTH
28
Bo Leckner CTH
29
Bo Leckner CTH
30
Bo Leckner CTH
31
Bo Leckner CTH
(mand et
al. 2007)
32
Bo Leckner CTH
33
Bo Leckner CTH
34
Bo Leckner CTH
35
Bo Leckner CTH
36
Bo Leckner CTH
37
38
ADVANTAGES OF CO-COMBUSTION
It is the cheapest method available for CO2 reduction
from energy conversion of fuels
It is cheaper than monocombustion of biofuels
Wastes can be utilized
Biofuels and wastes can be converted at a high
efficiency and with efficient flue gas cleaning
There may be positive synergy effects
Seasonal variations in the supply of additional fuels can
be handled, and the impact of quality variations can be
Bo Leckner
CTH
39
mitigated
DISADVANTAGES OF CO-COMBUSTION
The additional fuel ash can make secondary utilization of
ashes less favourable.
Biofuels can be more expensive than coal
There may be negative synergy effects
Lack of experience, particularly in case of extreme steam
data
Inactivation of SCR catalysts could occur
Bo Leckner CTH
40
41