Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infrastructure
Review
06 2013
|
03
Executive summary
The decision by the BRICS nations to set up a development bank for infrastructure
programmes in the major emerging economies poses as many questions as it
answers, not least what will it mean for Africa? ..3
The African Development Bank (AfDB) calculates that Africa needs around $390
billion over the medium term and trillions of dollars in the longer term to finance its
infrastructure development but that the continent should play a bigger role in raising
the vast sums of finance that is needed.....31
Chinas interest in Africa is by no means limited to acquiring resources, according to a
new analysis of its spending......32
Table of Contents
News & Analysis
Transport and Distribution....7
Energy...11
Telecommunications 15
Water.............................................19
Inputs.22
Companies.........................26
Finance and Investment29
Policy.....34
Market Indicators ...37
Summary of Recent News ...38
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
The idea may sound fanciful, but plans to connect Brazil, Russia, India, China and
South Africa via a 28,400 km marine telecommunications cable are deeply symbolic.
The proposed link, says South African President Jacob Zuma, will remove
`
dependency
on developed nations, allowing the five BRICS countries to communicate
directly on a south-south basis. The $1.5 billion project is, therefore, about a great
deal more than providing them with sound information and communication technology
infrastructure; it is seen as a tangible indication of the BRICS resolve to enable the
major developing nations to reduce their historic independence on Western institutions
they believe have served them badly.
As ambitious as it may sound, however, the marine cable may prove a lot easier to
bring about than the other ground-breaking initiative dubbed a new paradigm
embarked upon by the five BRICS countries at the start of April. At their Durban
meeting they proposed the establishment of a development bank, possibly armed with
$50 billion of seed capital and a $100 billion cushion in the shape of a contingency
reserve. Its job, to fund infrastructure projects across their own nations, worth anything
up $4.5 trillion. Despite talk of a new rival on the block, the new bank is essentially
being seen as an alternative, though not a replacement, to Western-dominated
financial institutions the Washington-based World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund that were created at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, in 1944,
primarily to promote US interests. BRICS countries may be deeply enmeshed in the
status quo structure of international development finance but, in focusing on their own,
developing world, they believe they will be reflecting a shift in global power and
influence. The time has come, they say, to reflect the seismic shift in geo-political
dynamics by constructing an institution with a different ideology and new value system
that can end dependence on lenders who impose neoliberal conditions ranging from
privatisation to premature market liberalisation.
If a new, post-crisis international monetary order is, indeed, emerging then there is no
doubt that the BRICS nations have a strong hand to play. Together, they represent
43% of the worlds population, something over 20% of global GD a share that is
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
rapidly rising and have combined foreign exchange reserves of more than $4 trillion.
Trade within the group surged to $282 billion in 2012, up from just $27 billion in 2002,
and it may reach $500 billion by 2015. Foreign direct investment into BRICS nations
reached $263 billion last year, accounting for 20% of global FDI flows. Given the
increasing frequency and magnitude of global financial crises, the addition of another
fund that can be rapidly mobilised in times of crisis and a new development bank that
promotes desperately needed infrastructure investment must be welcome. The World
Banks budget is clearly insufficient to finance required levels of global infrastructure,
while the processes involved in the release of its funds are complex and can be quite
burdensome. Neither does the creation of a new institution necessarily imply that it will
find itself competing with the likes of the World Bank and the IMF, especially as the
BRICS nations are deeply integrated in the existing order and are most unlikely to
become decoupled from it; it may be able to secure greater leverage in these
organisations but its foundation will be more of a response to an internal need, as
opposed to an externally focused agenda bent on dominating existing financial
institutions.
But the devil will be in the detail and the banks creation poses as many questions as
answers. The initiative has been met with considerable scepticism, not least in the
developed countries, which is nothing less than its supporters would have expected,
but even its backers acknowledge there is much work to be done before a new
institution can emerge. BRICS leaders meeting in Durban declared the proposal
feasible and viable but some difficult problems have to be resolved before any new
development bank could be up and running. Do they, indeed, have enough in common
and hold enough shared goals to function effectively? Intra-BRICS differences and
tensions are as significant as their similarities and the reality is that, since its first full
meeting in Russia in 2009, its achievements have been limited. As for making common
cause on global economic governance they failed to back a single candidate in the
search for a new IMF chief, resulting in the failure of a Nigerian candidate to get the
top job can they do it when it comes to much broader, bigger issues? Member
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
countries hardly invest in one another, preferring the developed worlds major
economies; just 2.5% of BRICS foreign investment goes to other countries in the
group, while more than 40% goes to the European Union, the US and Japan. Brazil,
South Africa and Russia are big resource exporters while China and India are
importers. There are also border tensions between India and China and a fight for
influence in Central Asia between China and Russia.
A major factor is the likely dominance of China in any new institution set up by the fivenation club, a country that has been much more successful in projecting its economic
power globally than its other partners and which must be wondering what it can
achieve via a BRICS bank that it cannot continue to do through its own, statecontrolled financial institutions. The BRICS states have wide differences in GDP, with
Chinas economy four times larger than Russia or India and around twenty times that
of South Africa, so how, for example, will the initial $50 billion capital be carved up?
Will China inevitably dominate and, essentially, use its seat at the table to leverage
more business not only from other BRICS countries but also from those within their
realm of influence? The Chinese are renowned for offering no-strings development aid,
particularly in Africa, as opposed to the conditional aid demanded by many other
lenders, but the unbalanced nature of its trade links on that continent are already
giving rise to concern. They stand accused of taking a neo-colonialist approach to the
continent and of exploiting its natural resources; it recently doubled to $20 billion its
loan pledge to Africa, sparking a recent warning from President Zuma that Africa
needed to be cautious when entering into partnerships with other economies. The
governor of Nigerias Central Bank said last month that Chinas approach to Africa was
in many ways as exploitative as that of the West, a significant contributor to Africas
de-industrialisation and underdevelopment.
South Africas role and standing in any new development bank is, in itself, a critical
issue. Its inclusion boosts its efforts to become an investment gateway into Africa and,
although the continent has its own, home-grown development banks, access to
another source of funds on the scale held by a BRICS bank offers the chance of a
massive additional injection of infrastructure finance. There are those who question the
validity of South Africa, a relative economic minnow, being a member of BRICS, given
its size and its ability to put up funds like its larger partners but failure to include an
African representative in the line-up would have left a gaping hole in the new
organisations claim to represent the developing world. Few, however, would deny that
the need to develop the continents physical infrastructure is critical to its continuing
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
economic development.
Estimates suggest that Africa will need to invest at least $100 billion over the next
decade to extend and upgrade its infrastructure if it is to maintain its economic growth.
.
Africas
collective GDP is forecast to rise from $1.6 trillion in 2010 to $2.6 trillion by
2015 while its economies will expand by an annual average rate of 5.5% over the
same period. But a recent World Bank study found that the poor state of infrastructure
in sub-Saharan Africa, including electricity, water, ports, roads, rail and IT, reduced
average national economic growth by two percentage points ever year and reduced
business productivity by as much as 40%. With properly targeted infrastructure
development, the continents GDP could rise significantly, although the availability of
specialist skills needed to deliver enabling legislation, regulation and development
itself will be as important as the availability of funds.
But can South Africa, which invited observers from 15 other African nations to the
Durban summit, rise to the challenge? It vehemently defends its inclusion within the
BRICS grouping and claims that, given its comparatively well developed infrastructure,
the country can act as a catalyst within the new organisation to help the entire
continent deliver the infrastructure that is required. Through BRICS, it will be expected
to help encourage the integration of African nations, which in turn should attract
investment flows and encourage intra-Africa trade. The joining together of Rwanda,
Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Burundi under the East African Community umbrella is
considered to be working well, as is the Southern African Development Community, a
socio-economic union of 15 countries. A new development bank should also be able to
assist in the shift away from dependence on agriculture to manufacturing. Existing
development institutions, such as the Development Bank of Southern Africa, certainly
have no problems with the idea, claiming a BRICS development bank would play a
critical role in funding development and regional integration on the continent.
There is another set of questions to be asked if the bank gets off the ground. What will
be its lending criteria? Will it intend to lend at market rates and what policies of
conditionality will, if any, be attached to loans? The World Banks soft loan arm, the
International Development Association, lends money on easy terms, charging little or
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
Analysis
Chinese back Transnet expansion
While the BRICS countries push ahead with plans for their own
development bank, China continues to shore up its role as Africas
major lender with mega-deals such as the March agreement to help
Transnet, South Africas state-owned ports and rail operator, upgrade
its infrastructure. An agreement with China Development Bank to
jointly finance, build and upgrade Transnet assets and also to pursue
cross-border infrastructure projects across the continent came with a
pledged R 46 billion ($5 billion) funding package. Last year, Transnet
announced an unprecedented R 300 billion investment programme
planned over the next seven years to expand railways, ports and
pipelines to help boost commodity exports; it indicated at the time that
the finance would come from its own resources and from fund-raising
on the capital markets. The deal, unsurprisingly, was hailed as an
example of what BRICS nations could achieve together it was
finalized at the BRICS summit in Durban though it also gave weight
to those observers who would claim such deals demonstrate that
creating a BRICS development bank is hardly necessary. Chinas
decision to back Transnet represents another measure of the
importance it attaches to ensuring that badly-needed commodities can
be easily transported, without incurring the bottlenecks that occur even
in countries with relatively well developed infrastructure such as South
Africa. For Transnet, the deal is a critical step in its plans to overcome
a long legacy of under-investment notably high port charges, long
waiting periods and the handling limitations of a rail network in need of
upgrading. Despite such problems, however, South African ports
remain regionally dominant and are unlikely to face serious challenges
to their position, at least in the short term, despite new investment
programmes being undertaken in neighbouring countries. While, for
example, Angolas recently upgraded line between the port of Lobito
and the Zambian border will help ease exports for landlocked countries
it will have minimal impact on South Africa. In similar fashion, Namibia,
Mozambique, Kenya and Tanzania are all planning to improve port
services. The port of Maputo, in Mozambique, for example, has shown
dramatic growth but it remains a comparatively minor player. By 2050,
however, it plans to be handling 50 million tonnes of cargo annually,
against 15 million tonnes currently. But rising competition between
regional ports should also improve the flow of trade in and through
South Africa.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
10
Energy
News
May 25: Tanzania said it would continue building a Chinese-funded
$1.2 billion gas pipeline from the south to Dar es Salaam despite violent
protests over the project.
May 24: Egypt announced an electricity project that will connect it
with Saudi Arabia and allow for the exchange of 3,000 MW of power.
May 19: Democratic Republic of Congo officials announced October
2015 as the start date for work on the $14 billion Inga III hydro-electric
dam.
May 13: Officials said work would start soon on the power connector
between Rwanda and Burundi following agreement on EU funding.
May 9: Nigeria said the 4,000 km Trans-Saharan gas pipeline,
agreed in 2002 between Nigeria and Algeria, was now under review
because of changing gas market conditions.
May 7: The World Bank and African Development Bank said they
will fund 80% of the $1.26 billion cost of the 2,000 MW Ethiopia-Kenya
power transmission line.
May 7: The African Development Banks Climate Investment Fund
approved plans by six north African nations to proceed with an updated
version of a plan to create 1,120 MW of solar-powered energy.
May 6: Construction of the Lake Turkana wind power project should
start by the end of this year, the African Development Bank said.
May 4: South African power utility Eskom said sub-Saharan
countries should together create a super power grid for the region.
April 25: Mozambiques National Hydrocarbon Company said it was
to conduct a study for a 2,100 km gas pipeline that would cost $4 billion
dollars. Work could begin in mid-2015.
April 24: The Power Holding Company of Nigeria and the World
Bank signed a $145 million partial risk guarantee for Nigerias gas
sector, enabling the countrys Egbin power station to secure long-term
gas supplies.
April 24: Zimbabwes Multi-Donor Trust Fund, managed by the
African Development Bank, made $35 million available for improving the
countrys power infrastructure.
May 23: Africa needs an extra 22,000 MW of cross-border
transmission line capacity to close the continents energy gap, according
to the Tanzanian government.
April 15: A World Bank official called Ghanas plan to extend
electrification to rural areas as insane, given that the country already
suffered severe power shortages in its main population centres.
April 10: The Indian Electrical and Electronics Manufacturers
Association said it wanted to boost power transmission and distribution
exports to the African continent.
April 9: The African Development Bank made a $157.6 million loan
to the Republic of the Congo to implement a rural electrification project.
April 8: NamPower of Namibia and Eskom of South Africa said they
intended to acquire stakes in the Kudu power station in Namibia, due to
come on line in 2017.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
11
Analysis
Slow cure for Nigerias ailing power sector
Nigerias dysfunctional power sector has been on the receiving end of so
many political pledges about its impending improvement that
expectations of progress seem are scarce as uninterrupted electricity
supplies. Decades of bad management, political infighting and the
squandering of huge chunks of investment some calculate $40 billion in
two decades intended for the power sector have reduced it to a wholly
inadequate system that generates around 4,000 MW for a country of 170
million people. That is one-tenth that of South Africas, despite the
country being Africas top oil producer and holding the worlds ninth
largest gas reserves. Around $13 billion a year is spent on diesel, most of
it imported. So reforming the countrys power generating and
transmission sector is critical to its economic well-being the current 7%
GDP annual growth rate could hit double figures if it was resolved and,
since his election in 2010, it has been declared to be President Goodluck
Jonathans number one political priority. The countrys Finance Minister
said in May that the country planned to sell $1 billion in Eurobonds to
finance power projects while the Minister of Power said the federal
government was working around the clock to expand grid capacity by
2014. The dismantling of the old state power monopoly reached a
milestone in April when private sector bids worth $2.3 billion were
approved for 15 of the 17 state-owned generation and distribution groups
comprising ten generators and five distribution operations. A sixth plant
was not sold because bids failed to meet technical standards but it is
being re-offered for sale. The identities of some of the new owners have
raised doubts about the chances of success of the newly-unbundled
sector, although the inclusion of several recognized technical partners
such as Siemens has given some cause for optimism. But the
privatization programme itself is months behind schedule and the
government has disclosed that it will need about $3.4 billion to fund the
planned expansion and upgrading of the national grid between now and
2016, simply to enable it to take the generated power available. The
African Development Bank is providing $150 million to help transmission
improvements and some of a $1 billion debut Eurobond will also be
allocated to upgrades. Ministerial suggestions that most of the
investment finance will be provided by government, international
development banks and multilateral agencies was met with complaints
that Nigerian banks could themselves could fund transmission projects.
When President Jonathan launched his electricity reform programme in
2010, he said Nigeria could boost generation from 3,000 MW to 10,000
MW by the end of 2013 (from the present 4,000 MW) and to 40,000 MW
by 2020. That seems unlikely but investor interest has been high, with
companies from India, Israel and Kenya joining those from Europe and
North America. More likely is an increase to around 6,000 MW within the
next two years, rising to around 9,000 MW by 2020. But with potential
demand as high as 140,000 MW, the challenge is daunting. In early May,
the President forecast that, following the completion of the privatisation
programme, an annual investment of $10 billion was likely over the
following ten years. Even so, it could take 50 years before Nigeria attains
the same per capita electricity consumption as South Africa.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
12
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
13
14
Telecommunications
News
May 22: Researchers at IBM said they had redrawn bus routes in
Ivory Coast using mobile phone data. They said such data could be used
for planning infrastructure projects.
May 17: Indias Tata Communications denied suggestions that it
planned to sell Neotel, its South African subsidiary.
May 13: The 17,000 km Africa Coast-to-Europe submarine, fibre optic
cable was inaugurated in Ghana. The $700 million project will link Ghana
with 22 other countries.
May 9: The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
shut down the operations of Eastern Cape-based Amatole
Telecommunications Services for non-payment of licence fees.
May 8: Epsilon Telecommunications linked with the SEACOM and
West Africa Cable System, giving the company undersea sable
connectivity that circumnavigates Africa.
May 3: An internet exchange point being developed in Tunisia should
cut costs and help the countrys efforts to attract business, according to
the Internet Society.
April 26: The Nigerian government enacted long-awaited mobile
number portability (MNP), allowing subscribers on the countrys four
major mobile networks to switch providers but retain their numbers.
April 26: Globacom of Nigeria signed a $750 million deal with Huawei
Technologies to expand the capacity of its Glo network.
April 24: Vodafone Group said it was boosting its investment in Africa
to offset stagnant earnings in Europe.
April 23: The Nigerian arm of MTN of South Africa signed a $3 billion
loan facility to expand its network. The loan was arranged by Nigerias
GT Bank but Citigroup, Standard Chartered and Nedbank were among
the lenders.
April 16: Rwanda was ranked among the top 10 countries in Africa in
a position to benefit from new communication technologies, according to
an index compiled by the World Economic Forum and the European
Institute of Business Administration.
April 10: Mauritius-based Liquid Telecom announced improvements
to its fibre network along the East African coast.
April 9: The Nigerian Communications Commission said that the
countrys CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) operators had lost 1.4
million active subscribers to GSM (Global System for Mobile
Communications) over the previous year.
April 2: Finnish mobile maker Nokia and Indias Bharti Airtel
announced a partnership to sell communications services in Africa.
April 1: France Telecom agreed a deal to outsource more than 2,000
mobile towers across the Ivory Coast and Cameroon to African
infrastructure group IHS.
March 25: Zambia Telecommunications (ZAMTEL) said it would
introduce broadband services to rural areas.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
15
Analysis
Nigerian mobile market still racing ahead
Given that 60% of Nigerians are living below the $2-a-day poverty mark,
millions of people would have to spend around 21 days of their food
budget to buy a basic mobile phone and thats what many of them must
be doing. A new analysis of the Nigerian mobile phone market by Gfk
retail and Technology Nigeria shows Nigerians spent NGN181 billion
($1.2 billion) in buying 21.5 million mobile phones in 2012. Of that total,
smart phones only accounted for about 4% of total sales. The figures
show that, driven by lower prices and a growing demand for broadband
services, subscriber growth rates mean Nigeria, with more than 100
million mobile phone users, has become Africas biggest and one of its
fastest-growing telecom markets.
Such rapid growth has led to problems with network congestion and
quality of service and huge amounts of foreign investment are pouring in
to provide additional base stations and fibre optic transmission systems
to support rising demand for increasingly cheaper bandwidth services.
Major infrastructure sharing deals have been concluded and several
high-speed long-term evolution (LTE) networks are being rolled out,
although commercial launches have been hindered by delays with
frequency spectrum allocations. Despite such rapid development, there is
also plenty of further potential for growth, given that market penetration is
estimated at somewhere between 75%-77%, with rural areas where
network rollouts are expensive yet to catch up.
16
Mathematics by mobile
The advent of mobile telephony has already had a massive impact on the
African economy but the communications revolution is also having an
increasing role to play in education across many parts of the continent.
So-called mobile learning is supporting and extending education in a
variety of ways that were previously impossible. As mobile hardware and
the networks that support them become more powerful, dynamic and
affordable, the mobility of these technologies offers new options for
teaching and learning. An example is Nokia Life, an information service
available in Nigeria, where its information channels deliver exam
preparation tips for middle and high school students and English
language learning. Mxit, Africas largest home-grown mobile social
network, not only allows youngsters to stay in touch but it also provides
live tutoring for mathematics homework. A project launched in 2007 has
already helped 32,000 school pupils work through maths problems by
connecting them with tutors for live instruction. But the barriers to
realizing the full educational potential of mobile technology remain
plentiful; tariffs may be falling but they remain too high for many Africans;
additional obstacles include a shortage of local language content and low
numbers of smartphones and tablets than can enrich and expand the
learning experience. But with 735 million mobile subscriptions already up
and running across the continent, accessibility is rising exponentially,
bringing with it open-ended education opportunities that may help to
compensate for any deficiencies in traditional education services.
17
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
18
Water
News
May 25: The Ghana government said it needs $225 million annually
to construct sustainable water and sanitation facilities.
May 23: Uganda became the first African nation to become a member
of the Water Cost Index, developed by water consultancy Waterfund and
IBM. It will calculate the cost of producing water in an effort to attract
funding for water projects.
May 21: The South African Department of Water Affairs said it would
start rolling out its new interim water supply programme, aimed at
clearing the backlog in municipal water-related services.
May 21: South Africa needs to invest an estimated R670 billion
($69.9 billion) in new water and sanitation infrastructure over the next
decade, the countrys Water Affairs minister said.
May 20: The African Development Bank launched a project to cut the
acute shortage of water in Burkina Faso.
May 20: There could be a shortage of clean water in South Africa if
consumers did not conserve it, the government warned.
May 17: South Africa approved the R12 billion ($1.25 billion) second
phase of the Lesotho Highlands water project, which will supply extra
water and electricity for Lesotho.
May 14: Djibouti was given a $35 million loan by the Arab Fund for
Economic and Social Development to improve drinking water supplies.
May 7: Aging water infrastructure in South Africas Gauteng province
meant 106 trillion gallons of water were lost in 2011-12, according to
official figures.
April 30: The Namibian government reiterated its determination to
continue with the Neckertal Dam, despite challenges to the tender award.
The dam will irrigate 5,000 hectares of land.
April 23: A water supply and sanitation system supported by the
African Development Bank was launched in Malawi. The project will cost
$80 million and supply water to seven centres.
April 16: The Zimbabwe Multi-Donor Trust Fund implemented the
first phase of its $29 million Urgent Water Supply and Sanitation
Rehabilitation project in five municipalities.
April 11: Nigerias Minister of Water Resources said the government
needed to spend $2.4 billion annually to deliver water services to the
population.
April 6: Libyan ministers and officials met a delegation of Egyptian
businessmen to discuss co-operation on water and sanitation
infrastructure projects.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
19
Analysis
Urgent need for South African water skills
South Africa needs to spend an astonishing R670 billion ($74 billion) on
its water resources over the next decade if the country is to meet
demand for clean, potable water. With a huge funding gap already
apparent, the challenge is not only to finance new water infrastructure but
to fund the maintenance and refurbishment of existing systems that
invariably provide insufficient supplies of poor quality. Above all,
however, according to Prof Tally Palmer, director of the Unilever Centre
for Environmental Water Quality at Rhodes University in Grahamstown,
an equally crucial infrastructure issue centres on wastewater treatment
works and the need to improve water management skills which given
the critical shortage of water engineers in the water sector could
provide an important new source of sustainable employment. She claims
that inadequate wastewater treatment is reducing water quality and
diminishing the capabilities of river systems to cope with contaminants
and that industry as well as government has to play a role in improving
standards. In South Africa, the intervention that would make the most
difference to river health is efficient and sufficient waste water treatment.
Many of our treatment works are currently held together and are
operated beyond design capacity by engineers. But with a yawning
funding deficit the countrys National water Resource Strategy has put
it at more than R300 billion significant tariff increases for consumers
somewhere along the line look increasingly inevitable.
20
Source: Unicef
21
Inputs
News
May 21: The Turkish Steel Exporters Association said it wanted to
explore co-operation and business prospects with South African
companies.
May 20: The former Cement and Concrete Institute of South Africa is
to continue as a newly-constituted body the Concrete Institute.
May 19: The Nigerian government said it intended to impose tariffs on
imported bulk cement because of a glut in the domestic market.
May 16: PPC, South Africas biggest cement maker, said it aimed to
see 40% of its production outside its home base by 2016. It plans to
build a $200 million cement plant in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
May 20: Tanzanias government is losing large tax revenues because
of cement smuggling and improperly taxed imports through Zanzibar,
according to Erik Westberg, managing director of Tanga Cement.
May 20: South Africas National Union of Mineworkers said it wanted
pay rises of up to 60% from gold and coal producers.
May 17: South Africas Aggregate and Sand Producers Association
said the countrys quarries were not being used to their full capacity
because of lack of skills.
May 16: Zambias National Council for Construction attacked cement
price increases, warning that they would raise construction costs.
May 16: Double-digit wage hikes in South Africa were unacceptable,
according to the UNI Global Union, which represents 15 million trade
union members worldwide.
May 13: Sasol Chemicals faced a Competition Tribunal to reject
claims that its propylene and polypropylene prices are excessively high.
May 10: South African steel shipments from ArcelorMittal rose by
4.2% in Q1 2013 compared to the last quarter of 2012.
May 9: Dangote Cement said it would build a crude oil refinery in
Nigeria to reduce petrol imports.
April 23: The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa
demanded a 20% across-the-board pay rise for workers in auto
assembly, tyre making, iron, steel and base metal manufacturing sectors.
April 17: Aviation fuel sold in Africa is, on average, 21% more costly
than in other international markets, the International Air Transport
Association said.
April 17: The Cement Manufacturers Association of Nigeria called for
a review of the industrys code of standards to make them more robust
and uniform.
April 17: Shares in steel maker ArcelorMittal rose after news that the
fire-damaged Vanderbijlpark steel plant had resumed output.
April 10: In an effort to stem rising fuel costs, the Zimbabwean
government approved a new ethanol blend 85, in addition to the alreadyapproved E5.
April 10: Egypt-based Suez Cement said it had scaled back output
last year by as much as 30% because lack of fuel supplies hit production.
April 9: South African cement maker Afrisam said it would expand
into other African countries.
March 27: Demand for cement in Zambia may double over the next
10 years, according to the local unit of Lafarge SA. It rose 13% last year.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
22
Analysis
South African steel sector suffers
South Africas steel manufacturing sector has been having tough times,
with production falling sharply in the early months of this year, record
imports of cheaper steel from Japan and Korea, ongoing technical
problems at mills, strikes and a dearth of new mining and other industrial
capital projects. Output, according to the World Steel Association was
down 12.5% in March, having fallen by almost 17% in the previous month
bringing Q1 production down 11.3% year-on-year. Steel producers
usually track growth in GDP but this has not been the case in South
Africa, where both major operators have been recording losses and
failing even to match production with growth in a weakened economy.
Demand from the construction industry has been falling, given delays in
major infrastructure projects and even the automotive sector, the fastestgrowing customer market for steelmakers, has lost steam. Neither does
the outlook appear to be any better, given not only the domestic picture
but the difficult conditions in global markets, where long-term steel pricing
contracts are, increasingly being replaced by spot market prices, driven
by Chinas rapid economic growth. Chinas own steel output the
industry is a major importer of South African iron ore grew by just over
9% year-on-year in Q1 of this year, against a global production increase
of 2.3%. No wonder that some eyebrows are being raised at the
governments apparent enthusiasm for establishing a new steel producer
that, it says, would create competition in a market dominated by
ArcelorMittal and Evraz Highveld. A feasibility study, the Department of
Trade and Industry says, has made significant progress and a number of
overseas investors, including the Chinese, are being approached. Given
the recent funding deal between Transnet and China Development Bank,
the Chinese are being tipped as a likely backer of any new steel
production project, especially given its heavy involvement in the countrys
metals and minerals sector. In the meantime, the government says it is
planning to intervene in the steel sector by setting steel prices, setting
national production targets and limiting exports of iron ore. The idea is to
secure local steel at developmental prices, making it available for
downstream manufacturing industry. Critics say the measures wont do
anything to make South Africas steel industry more competitive in
markets dominated by much bigger players.
23
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
24
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
Petrol
R13.08
$1.43
Companies
News
May 23: Equinox International, the infrastructure technology
company, said it was opening a new headquarters in Lagos, Nigeria.
May 15: South African state rail and ports operator Transnet said it
will invest R15.7 billion ($1.71 billion) in fiscal year 2014, up 12% from
the preceding year.
May 1: General Electric of Nigeria said the sustainable development
of Nigerias infrastructure was a key factor in attracting foreign direct
investment into the country.
April 23: Bharti Airtel, Indias largest telecommunications company,
agreed to buy Warid Telecom in Uganda, The deal will make it the
second-largest telecom operator in the country.
April 23: Total South Africa said that following agreement on a new,
15-year lease with Transnet National Ports Authority in Durban, it would
invest R140 million in upgrading its Durban Island View lubricants plant.
April 14: Indian engineering company Larsen & Toubro said it was
seeking partners in Africa to bid for airport and power projects.
April 12: Telecommunications group MTN said it may spend $8
billion on acquisitions in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
April 4: Rail engineering group Racec, based in Cape Town, said it
had secured short-term finance to fund any dispute resolution
proceedings arising out of a railway project in Sierra Leone.
April 1: Chinese mobile phone maker Tecno has agreed a deal with
local partner Zenco Communications to exclusively market its phones in
Lagos, Nigeria.
March 16: Airports Company South Africa said international
passenger traffic using its airports rose by 2% last year.
March 4: Egyptian authorities barred the chief executive of Orascom
Construction Industries from leaving the country while allegations of tax
evasion are investigated.
Analysis
BPs growing confidence in Africa
BPs decision to invest more than R5 billion in South Africa and
Mozambique over the next five years on building and upgrading
infrastructure represents a clear vote of confidence in its ongoing role
across the African continent. Much of the investment is focused on South
Africa, where the company has recently opened with Sasol a fuel depot
at Alrode outside Johannesburg, and where it will now invest in various
projects, including refinery, terminal and rail network operations.
Upstream, the group is also pursuing business opportunities in Angola,
Algeria, Namibia, Libya and Egypt while, downstream, it is improving and
upgrading fuel import infrastructure in Mozamibique.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
26
27
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
28
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
29
Analysis
AfDB - African capital markets must do more
The African Development Bank (AfDB) calculates that Africa needs
around $390 billion over the medium term and trillions of dollars in the
longer term to finance its infrastructure development and that the
continent should play a bigger role in raising the vast sums of finance
that is needed. Early May brought news that the bank itself is trying to
help solve the problem via the creation of an infrastructure bond that
could be as large as $50 billion, first targeting the foreign reserves of
African banks and, secondly, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and
other global investors. If African banks alone contributed 5% of their
reserves to the bond, the AfDB acting as an investment conduit could
raise $22 billion. The development followed publication of a new report
by the AfDB on structured finance techniques and economic growth in
Africa. It says that rapid economic growth across the continent is creating
a pool of financial resources and now that domestic capital markets are
growing and becoming more sophisticated in several countries, Africa
must start to leverage its own resources more in order to ensure that
badly needed infrastructure projects materialise. It points out that Africas
own natural resource extractive industries will contribute more than $30
billion annually in government revenues over the next 20 years and that
some of these revenues could help fund a substantial part of
development budgets. As a result, AfDB concludes, there are growing
opportunities for the use of project bonds; Kenya, for example, has
launched infrastructure bonds from both central government and from
state-owned enterprises such as state utility KenGen while other
emerging markets, particularly in Latin America, are using bonds as a
way to catalyse investor interest. But no-one is suggesting that the
spread of project bonds will be an easy or a quick fix, given that the
product has no real track record on the continent and that while pension
funds and institutions are interested in buying the cashflows of mature, or
at least completed, infrastructure assets, they will prove a lot more
reluctant to take on such up-front risks. Many project finance deals are
also government linked, so governments will have to demonstrate that
their domestic capital markets operate to the highest standards before
potential investors are ready to participate. Financial market reforms will
also be an essential pre-requisite in many countries before efficient bond
markets develop enough to become a primary course for infrastructure
finance.
30
and their costs added up to $400 million. The fact that we were able to
sell our story shows that we are strong managers of the economy and
committed to implementing new programmes.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
31
32
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
33
Policy
News
May 23: The World Trade Organisation said that East African
governments had to improve roads, ports and trade procedures if the
region was to meet its full economic potential.
May 14: African countries could not afford to adopt a stop-go
approach to infrastructure development and had to ensure that it was a
continuous process if skills were to be retained, Eskom chief executive
Brian Dames said.
May 9: The infrastructure boom in Africa presented governments
with a great opportunity to work with private investors to root ourt
corruption, Deloites South Africa said.
April 23: Large revenues from mineral exploitation could, if used
wisely, fuel economic growth, cut poverty and transform Africas state of
development, the World Bank said.
April 20: Libya said it was going to invest $314 million on building
stadia this year to host the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations, helping to
maintain the countrys double-digit growth rate.
April 18: Africas health sector needs at least $30 billion of
investment over the next ten years to bridge the health infrastructure
gap, a senior World Bank health specialist said.
April 17: South Africas minister of finance unveiled plans to finance
R827 billion worth of infrastructure projects over the next three years, up
from R642 billion over the previous three year period.
April 10: The Angolan Ministry of Energy and water defined the
expansion of the countrys energy networks as its budget priority for the
period up until 2016.
April 8: Gemalto, the Dutch-based digital security specialist, was
appointed prime contractor and turnkey supplier to provide Ghana with
a new border control and management system.
Analysis
World Bank calls for key partnerships
Africas economies may be showing strong growth but their record on
competitiveness remains poor by international standards, demanding
big improvements in public institutions and infrastructure, according to a
new report* on competitiveness published in May by the World Bank. In
order to achieve that, it concludes, far great collaboration between
public and private sector is an urgent priority if Africa is to secure better
roads, efficiently run ports, reliable electricity and other infrastructure
improvements that will make countries more attractive to job-creating
investors. With the World Banks own figures suggesting that the
continent needs $93 billion a year over the next decade to fund its
infrastructure needs (15% of the regions GDP) $60 billion for new
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
34
projects and the rest for maintenance the need for securing finance
from the widest possible range of options is paramount. Enter public
private partnerships (PPP) which increasingly are being considered as
individual nations seek to redress their infrastructure deficits. But this
development finance model, in which the state shares risks and
responsibilities with private companies but, ultimately, retains control of
assets, throws up many challenges if it is to deliver value for money and
give the investor confidence. The most significant can be political
instability and a shortage of capacity and experience in a public sector
that is used to conventional public procurement rather than working in
collaboration with the private sector. Case studies suggest that PPPs are
complex, demanding and time-consuming but that, under the right
conditions and in the right sectors, they can offer benefits to
governments, the private sector and to consumers. Perhaps the biggest
obstacle, however, is convincing consumers that free, undervalued or
heavily-subsidised services and infrastructure cannot be sustained and
that the price of progress, apart from potentially higher user costs, is
conceding the need for increasing, carefully regulated private sector
involvement. *The Africa Competitiveness Report 2013. World Bank.
35
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
36
MARKET INDICATORS
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
37
Energy
Mar 7: Construction work resumed on the Medupi power plant in South Africa following a period of labour unrest.
Mar 4: Denmark agreed to offer technical assistance and DKr 40 million ($6.9 million) financial support for the
development of wind power in South Africa.
Feb 22: The European Union approved a 68 million 88.4 million) grant to improve power generation and
transmission in Burundi.
Feb 21: Sierra Leone energy minister Oluniyi Robin-Coker said output from the countrys Bumbuna hydroelectric
power plant halved to 10 MW due to maintenance work.
Feb 8: The International Atomic Energy Agency concluded a 10-day review of South Africas nuclear infrastructure.
South Africa is expected to make a decision on a nuclear plant building programme by June.
Jan 31: US power group General Electric said it would invest $1 billion in Nigeria over five years building a
manufacturing plant to support power generation and oil production.
Jan 17: Forty eight foreign and local gas plant workers were killed in a terrorist attack on a gas facility in southern
Algeria.
Jan 10: Coal shipments from the Richards Bay coal terminal in South Africa in 2012 rose 4.3% to a six-year high of
68.3 million tonnes.
Jan 1: Botswana Power Corporation entered a new 100 MW three- year firm-basis supply contract with South African
power generator Eskom. It also agreed a 200 MW supply on a non-firm basis to July 31.
Telecommunications
Feb 21: Moroccan telecommunications group Maroc Telecom said net profits for 2012 fell 17% to 6.7 billion dirhams
($783 million).
Feb 8: Econet Wireless Zimbabwe bought out the minority shareholders in local retail financial group TN Bank as part
of its internet banking strategy.
Feb 6: South African mobile phone group MTN agreed to buy the 50% shareholding in MTN Cyprus owned by its
local partner Amaracos Holdings.
Jan 31: Kenyan telecoms group Safaricom suspended a total of 2.5 million unregistered SIM cards as part of a
government crackdown on fraud.
Jan 22: South Sudan will lay a fibre-optic link this year between the capital Juba and offshore submarine cables, state
telecom officials said.
Jan 21: Zambian telecoms group Zamtel said it planned to build 400 new 3G sites this year as part of its plan to
double its subscriber base to 2 million.
Dec 20: Vodacom Tanzania said it would invest Ts250 billion ($153 million) developing its network in Tanzania in
2013.
Dec 14: Angola Cables inaugurated a fibre optic submarine cable linking Angola and Brazil.
Inputs
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
38
Feb 21: Malawian government workers ended a two-week strike following agreement to raise salaries between 5%-61%,
depending on pay grades.
Companies
Feb 25: South African Breweries said it would build a R700 million ($76.4 million) maltings plant in Gauteng, South
Africa.
Feb 25: South African builder WBHO reported a 43% rise in revenue to R12.02 billion for the six months to endDecember, with post-tax profit7.8% higher at R412 million.
Feb 25: South African aluminium group Hulamin boosted headlineearnings 19% to R64 million for the year to end
December. Operatingprofit rose 44% to R245 million.
Feb 21: South African equipment leasing group Eqstra made a R146million offer to buy the remaining 67.2% of
engineering group ProtechKhuthele it does not already own.
Feb 20: South African and US business groups set up the UnitedStates-South Africa Business Council to encourage bilateral tradebetween the two countries.
Feb 18: US beverage group PepsiCo opened a Sh2.6 billion ($30.3million) soft drinks manufacturing plant in Nairobi.
Feb 15: US electrical infrastructure contractor Symbion acquired a67% stake in troubled South African power
transmission and distributiongroup EJ Power.
Feb 15: German group G Power Cement announced plans to build aCFA franc 45 billion ($89.2 million) cement plant in
the coast city ofLimbe, Cameroon. The plant will be operational by 2015 and have anannual output of 800,000 tonnes.
Feb 13: South African building contractor Group Five boostedoperating profit 23% to R270 million in the six months to
end-December.Revenues were 16% higher at R5.1 billion.
Feb 6: South African builder Murray & Roberts cut its Middle Eastworkforce by 28% following a drop-off in business in
Qatar.
Jan 22: JSE-listed construction and engineering group Basil Read was awarded a R279 million two-year contract to
upgrade a 33-km section of South Africas National Route 5.
Dec 12: South African cement group PPC bought a 51% stake in Rwandan cement company Cimerwa for $64.9 million.
Finance
Feb 26: Tanzania set an initial price guide of 600 basis points over Libor for its forthcoming issue of a $500 million sevenyear amortising bond.
Feb 22: Angola announced plans to raise $1 billion in a debut eurobond later this year to pay for infrastructure
development.
Feb 21: Kenyan electricity producer Kengen said it planned to raise Sh30 billion ($350 million) through a 20-year bond to
build geothermal power plants.
Feb 19: The World Bank approved an additional $60 million in financing to improve the availability of electricity in rural
Rwanda.
Feb 4: Botswanan Finance minister Kenneth Mathambo said the troubled Morupule B power station would receive a
further Pula 200 million ($24.3 million) funding in the current financial year.
Jan 31: Zambia Railways said it plans to issue a $500 million eurobond this year to fund expansion of the rail network.
Jan 23: The International Finance Corporation unit of the World Bank announced plans to issue its first nairadenominated bond, worth the equivalent of $50 million, to develop Nigerias domestic capital markets.
Jan 11: Ivory Coast signed a $500 million low-interest loan agreement with China's Export-Import Bank to build a 275
MW hydropower station near Soubre.
Dec 19: Zambia signed a $55 million loan agreement with the African Development Bank to support the 120 MW ItezhiTezhi hydropower and transmission line project.
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
39
Nedbank Capital
Mike Peo
Brett Botha
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
40
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
41
definition of a major US institutional investor in the United States or for use by any citizen or resident
of the United States. The financial instruments described herein may not have been registered under
the US Securities Act of 1933 (the Act) and may not be offered or sold in the United States of
America or to US persons unless they have been registered under such Act, or except in compliance
with an exemption from the registration requirements or such Act. US entitles that are interested in
trading securities listed in this report should contact a US registered broker dealer. Nedbank accepts
responsibility for the issuance of this report when distributed in the United States to US persons who
meet the definition of a US major institutional investor. The distribution of this document in other
jurisdictions may be prohibited by rules, regulations and/or laws of such jurisdiction. Any failure to
comply with such restrictions may constitute a violation of United States securities laws or the laws of
any such other jurisdictions.
Volume 2, Issue 2
_
African Infrastructure Review June/August 2013
42