Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A REPORT ON
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SUBMITTED BY: POSHAN KARKI
BCT STUDENT
Report Number:-R3
A REPORT ON
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
KAPIL GAJUREL
CIVIL ENGINEER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are highly indebted to all our respected instructors of IOE, Pulchowk
Campus for their exquisite remarks and precious guidance with which they
guided us through every academic task forwarded by this institute in
different engineering assignments and tasks to boost the students capability
as a diligent engineer.
We are highly thankful to our project supervisor Dr.Kamal
Thapawhose encouragement and trendsetting guidance helped us
understand this project better. His perpetual guidance and willingness to
share his vast knowledge made us undertake this project and its
manifestations in great depths and helped us complete the assigned project
titled
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING. This project wouldnt have been a success
without his kind support, untiring efforts and encouragements in each and
every task.
We would like express our gratitude to Campus Chief Dr. Arvinda
Kumar Mishra and our Head of the Department VishwaNathKhanal for
their extended support.
Also, we are extremely thankful towards Prof.Dr. PremNathMaskey,
Prof. Dr. Hikmat Raj Joshi, Dr. RajanSuwal, Er. SujanTripathi,
Er.PradipKoirala, Er.Siddhartha Shankarandwho laid the foundations on
structure during B.E. courses through semesters first to eight. We would
certainly anticipate their kind comments on our project works on the basis of
their long experiences and professional knowledge.
We would not be able to stand out without basic foundation books
written and published by author. Dr. GokarnaBadahurMotra, Suresh
Hadafor letting us acquainted with the basics of structures. Finally, we would
like to show appreciationto all the personalities who supported us directly or
indirectly in completion of project work and to prepare this wonderful report.
We would like to acknowledge each of our group members for their jovial
understanding and reinforcement.
ABSTRACT
Tribhuvan University, Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Campus offers
a four year course on Bachelor Degree in Civil Engineering at the final
semester as the practical application of the theoretical knowledge that we
acquired during the four year. Project on different topics are performed which
may be allocated by the institute to the students.
One of the major causes of failure of any structure is its improper
analysis and design. So, proper knowledge on analysis and design of
structure is utmost importance. This project work on ANALYSIS AND
DESIGN OF BUILDING presents the analysis and design of structural
components of an Commercial Complex. We prepared the drawings of the
building using AutoCAD 2013. Structural design is carried out: initially by
Preliminary Design and then Detail Design. A preliminary design is carried
out for the structural components of the building using IS-456 and SP-16.
Then, the load calculation is done using IS-875 (Part I V) and IS-1893.
The loads acting on the building comprised of dead loads, live loads and
earthquake loads. After identification and evaluation of all the loads acting in
the building, analysis of structure is done by providing different load
combinations in the computer software SAP 2000 v15. After SAP analysis,
results are extracted. Then, Detail Design is carried out taking the results of
severest combination of loads from SAP analysis. The Detail Design of
structural elements is also based on the provisions provided by the relevant
codes. After detail design, the results are tabulated and the structural
drawings (detailing) are drawn showing the results in a prescribed format
governed by relevant codes. Thus, the designed building is ready for
construction.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 6
INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 BACKGROUND:
1.2 THEME OF THE PROJECT
1.3 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPES
1.4 DESIGN
1.5 DETAILING
6
6
7
7
7
CHAPTER 2 8
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
2.1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
2.2 STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN
2.3 NEED OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN
8
8
8
8
CHAPTER 3 9
LOAD ASSESSMENT
9
3.1
INTRODUCTION
3.1.1 Dead Loads:
3.1.2 Live Loads:
3.1.3
Seismic Loads:
3.2 UNIT WEIGHTS FOR DEAD LOAD CALCULATION
3.3 LIVE LOADS
3.4 SEISMIC LOAD
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
CHAPTER 4 16
MODELING AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 16
4.1 SALIENT FEATURE OF SAP2000
4.2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 5 17
CONCLUSION
17
BIBLIOGRAPHY
18
16
16
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background:
1.4 Design
The following materials are adopted for the design of the elements:
Concrete grade M25 for beam, column and slab
Reinforcement steel-Fe415
Limit state method is used for the design of RC elements. The design is
based on IS:456 2000, SP-16, IS:1893-2002, SP-34 and reinforced concrete
designers handbook are extensively used in the process of design.
1.5 Detailing
Space frame is considered as a special moment resisting frame (SMRF)
with a special detailing to provide the ductile behavior and comply with
the requirements given in IS1893, IS 13920-1993, Handbook on concrete
reinforcement and detailing (SP34) are extensively used.
CHAPTER 2
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
CHAPTER 3
LOAD ASSESSMENT
3.1 Introduction
As described earlier, the building is a RCC framed structure, located
in the Kathmandu valley. Thus wind loads, snow loads, and other special
types of loads described by IS 875 (part 5):1987 can be taken as negligible
as compared to the dead, live and seismic loads.
3.1.3
Seismic Loads:
These are the load resulting from the vibration of the ground
underneath the superstructure during the earthquake. The earthquake is an
unpredictable natural phenomenon. Nobody knows the exact timing and
magnitude of such loads. Seismic loads are to be determined essentially to
produce an earthquake resistant design.
8
Seismic loads on the building may be incorporated by1. Response Spectrum Method: In this method the design earthquake
forces are determined adopting IS 1893:2002. These design forces for the
buildings located along two perpendicular directions may be assumed to
act separately along each of these two horizontal directions.
2. Time History Analysis: In it the ground is subjected to a
predetermined acceleration and subsequent stress in the structural
elements are determined by appropriate methods.
3.2
3.3
Live Loads
3.4
Seismic Load
Z I Sa
2Rg
Where,
Z = Zone factor given by IS 1893 (Part I):2002 Table 2, Here for Zone
V,
9
Z = 0.36
I = Importance Factor,
I = 1 for commercial building.
R = Response reduction factor given by IS 1893 (Part I): 2002 Table 7,
R = 5.0
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient which depends on
Fundamental natural period of vibration (Ta).
According to IS 1893 (Part I): 2002 Cl. No. 7.6.1
The approximate fundamental natural period of vibration (T a) in second of
moment resisting frame building with brick infill panel may be estimated by
empirical expression:
0.09h
TX,Y = d 1 /2
for RC frame building considering infill wall
Where,
h= height of building in metre. This excludes the basement storeys, where
basement walls are connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between
the building columns. But, it includes the basement storeys, when they are
not so connected.
z I Sa 0.36 1
A h= =
2.5=0.18
2 R g
2
5
According to IS 1893 (Part I) : 2002 Cl. No. 7.5.3 the total design lateral
force or design seismic base shear (V B) along any principle direction is
given by
VB = Ah x W
Where, W = Seismic weight of the building
W= 118755.82 KN
Then,Vb=0.18*118755.82 KN= 21376.05 KN
The total base shear is firstly distributed horizontally in basement in
proportion to the stiffness. Then according to IS 1893 (part I):2002 C.L. No.
7.7.1 the design base shear (VB) computed above shall be distributed along
the height of the building as per the following expression:
Qi=
Vb(Wih i2 )
n
Wih i2
j=1
10
Store
y
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Weight(
w) (KN)
1913.3
13745.3
7
14087.1
15603.2
7
14547.8
1
14547.8
1
14547.8
1
14440.2
4
15323.1
1
hi
(m)
32.9
4
29.2
8
25.6
2
21.9
6
18.3
14.6
4
10.9
8
7.32
3.66
wihi^2
2076013.
92
11784158
.62
9246552.
68
7524545.
89
4871916.
09
3118026.
3
1753889.
79
773742.7
2
205262.2
5
11
Wi
(KN)
1073.1
6091.2
6
4779.5
7
3889.4
6
2518.3
1
1611.7
2
906.59
399.95
106.09
Vi (KN)
1073.1
7164.3
6
11943.
93
15833.
39
18351.
7
19963.
42
20870.
01
21269.
96
21376.
05
118755.
82
41354108
.26
21376.
05
10
Storey no.
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Lateral force(KN)
12
5000
6000
7000
Joint Displacements
Joint
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
U1
-0.012582
-0.012285
-0.01183
-0.011248
-0.010007
-0.008428
-0.006564
-0.004479
-0.002244
drift(m)
0.000297
0.000455
0.000582
0.001241
0.001579
0.001864
0.002085
0.002235
0.002244
0.012582
0.012285
0.01183
0.011248
0.010007
0.008428
0.006564
0.004479
0.002244
Allowable drift
13
drift(mm)
0.297
0.455
0.582
1.241
1.579
1.864
2.085
2.235
2.244
14.63 mm, Hence
O.K.
Storey Drift
10
9
8
7
6
Storey no.
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Drift(mm)
CM
(')
(Moment EL-Y)
CS
(')
e (')
9 15.76
16
-0.24
1.76
-1.57
Force
(KN)
536.5
5
8 53.84
3.615
0.225
1.75
-1.58
6091.
26
10659.7
1
7 54.71
54
1.97
14
-1.43
4779.
57
9415.75
0.71
eda(
m)
edb(m
)
Ta(KNm)
944.33
Tb(KN
m)
-842.38
9624.1
9
6834.7
9
6 52.89
54
-1.11
2.15
-1.31
5 52.85
54
-1.15
2.17
-1.3
3889.
46
2518.
31
8362.34
5095.1
9
5464.73
-3273.8
CHAPTER 4
MODELING AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Three-dimensional frames
Three-dimensional trusses
Planar frames
Planar grillages
Planar trusses
4.2 Structural Analysis
The structural analysis is done using the SAP 2000(V14). Since the design is
aimed for the adequate resistance to the earthquake, the analysis is done by
both methods of analysis namely Static and Dynamic analysis.For the static
analysis, the design lateral force is distributed to the various floor levels
which is then distributed to individual lateral load resisting elements
depending on floor diaphragm action. In SAP 2000, the modeling for rigid
15
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Seismic analysis was done during the project by taking design basis
earthquake which makes our building earthquake resistant. Earthquake
force in a building was determined by using Seismic Co-efficient Method.
While calculating lateral load, the Base Shears obtained by mass
lumped at floor level. The value of Base Shear was 21376.05KN and total
mass of the building was 118755.82KN.
The net bearing capacity of soil was assumed to 110 KN/m 2 for the
particular site.
With increase in load with time, steel will attain yield strength before
concrete attains its full strength. The column will carry further load
because steel will sustain yield stress while concrete will carry additional
load until it attains its full strength.
The maximum axial load and moments acting along the length of the
column was considered for the design of the column section by Limit State
Method. The design required determination of area of longitudinal steel
(load carrying capacity) and its distribution and transverse steel.
The Section of all the floors was same except for that of the basement
column.
16
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCE BOOKS:
REFERENCE CODES:
IS 456 : 2000
Concrete
IS 875 : 1987
and
17