Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 (2015)
Page |1
ABSTRACT
During a chemical reaction, chemical kinetics explains how fast or slow the reaction occurs and it is expressed in reaction rates. The
iodine clock reaction aids to explain this concepts. It shows how the factors like concentration, temperature, and catalysts affect the
reaction rate between the persulfate ion,
S 2 O8
S 2 O8
and
were
prepared in different concentrations to find the rate law using the initial rate methods and graphical methods. Another runs of run 2
were prepared under different temperatures, at ambient (300 K), hot (328 K), and cold (278 K) conditions to explain the effect of
temperature and catalyst on the reaction rate. Consequently, the calculated activation energy (
Ea
(A) values were solved by using the Arrhenius equation. The last set at constant concentration and constant temperature were
prepared for the addition of
CuS O4
Page |2
1. Introduction
Spontaneity does not imply how fast or slow a
reaction because there are many spontaneous reactions
that are either fast or slow. Factors that affects the rate
of reaction is governed by chemical kinetics. Chemical
kinetics is the area of chemistry that is concerned about
reaction rates that deals with the speed at which
changes occur. It can be described in a reaction rate, the
change in the concentration of a reactant or product per
unit of time, Zumdahl. (2012). For example, in the
reaction of the experiment Iodine Clock Reaction is the
reaction between persulfate ion,
2
S 2 O8
iodide ion,
The variable
[B]
and
CuS O4
2+ I 2
2 S O4
2+ 2 I
S 2 O8
[A]
as a
KI ,KCl
2
S2 O 8
2
S O4
Rate=
K 2 S 2 O8 , K 2 S O4
Na 2 S2 O3
2
S 2 O8
R=k
(3)
Na 2 S2 O3
,
, mL
, mL
, mL
mL
, mL
1
10
0
5
5
5
2
5
5
5
5
5
3
2.5
7.5
5
5
5
4
5
5
7.5
2.5
5
5
5
5
10
0
5
All temperature and time were measured each run.
After the color turned blue, a stopwatch timer is used for
measuring time.
The rate of reaction for the first group was calculated
using the rate law. The order of the reaction was known
by using the initial rate method, graphing ln rate vs ln
S 2 O8
or ln
Runs
Ea
activation energy (
(A):
ln k =
Ea 1
+ ln A
R T
( )
(m)
the y-intercept
( b)
E a / R
is equivalent to
ln A
is equivalent to
y=mx +b
CuS O4
0.02
0.02
0.0008
361
0.00277
0.03
0.04
0.0008
105
0.00952
0.04
0.04
0.0008
60
S 2 O8
0.00746
0.0167
2
S 2 O8
2
S 2 O8
R=k
increases. This
affected the
(6)
and
is constant). In
87
134
0.0008
0.0008
0.0115
],M
(5)
(since
Rate,
1/s
0.02
0.02
2
S 2 O8
2
S 2 O3
Reactio
n time,
s
1
2
concentration of
concentration of
,M
0.08
0.04
and
],M
(4)
2
S 2 O8
the line.
For the effect of temperature group from sets of run 2
were prepared by using a hot plate and an ice bath. The
temperatures were set at ambient (300 K), hot (328 K),
and cold (278 K) conditions. Since the temperatures were
give, the Arrhenius Equation is useful for solving the
Page |3
S 2 O8
of the graph of
ln rate vs. ln [
2
S 2 O8
Page |4
2
S 2 O8
I
R=k
S 2 O8
(7)
]
To compare the two different rate laws, Table 3 shows
the comparison of calculated rate constants using
different rate laws (6 and 7). It showed a large difference
in rate constant values (see Appendix C for calculations).
Table 3. Reaction rate and calculated rate constants of
different rate laws
Rate, 1/s
k 1 (m=0.
k 2 (m=1;
[S 2 O8 ]
ln
1
2
3
4
5
ln rate
which
601;
n=0.623)
0.582
0.581
0.332
0.581
0.858
0.0115
0.00746
0.00277
0.00952
0.0167
n=1)
7.1875
9.325
6.925
7.933
10.4375
( aq)
3
+ S 2 O slow [I S 2 O 8 ](aq)
I (aq)
fast I 2 (aq)+ 2 S O4 ( 8)
Figure 2. Graph of ln rate vs. ln [
3
[ I S2 O 8 ](aq)
+I
ln rate
is step 2, because
[I ]
lnf(x)
= 0.93x + 1.49
R = 0.95
B is to consume
I2
2
S 2 O3
in beaker
I2
were consumed,
2
S 2 O3
ions
I2
Page |5
I2
because
ln A
J/mol and
2+ I 2
slow 2 S O 4
), the graph of ln k
(see
Appendix
calculated values of
Mechanism:
Ea
2.697 108
Ea
,
E a / R
with
for
and
calculations)
The
were 45,734.4826
respectively.
2+2 I
S 2 O8
2
2 fast 2 I +S 4 O 6
I 2 + 2 S2 O 3
I 2 +starch slow complex
S 2 O8
R=k
k 1
K
n time,
k 2
s
1
300
134
0.00746
727.187
9.325
2
328
2.64
0.378
36,846.7 473.4
6
75
3
278
506.77
0.00197
192.352 2.466
5
*where m=1.601; n=1.623
**where m=1; n=1
Table 4 above shows that the temperature affected
the temperature directly. When the temperature was
increased, the reaction time for the mixture to turn blue
decreased. Since the reaction rate used is the reciprocal
of the reaction time, it would increase.
A=1.919 10 15
Ea
is 80,250.885
2
S 2 O8
I
R=k
accounted
as
errors
in
solution
preparations,
temperature readings, or time readings. This may be
caused by human error, or environmental factors.
4. Summary and Conclusions
The different reactant concentration affected the
reaction rate. From the given initial rates, the m and n
values were 0.601 and 0.623, respectively. The
exponents were approximately to 1 and can be deduced
as a second order reaction. The graph of ln rate vs. ln [
S 2 O8
y=0.9264x
occur. While
Page |6
Ea
and
] that has a
linear equation of
From the experiment, there were factors that affect the
reaction rate. First, the different reactant concentration
affected the reaction time as well as the reaction rate. It
affected the reaction time inversely and the reaction rate
directly. Another factor that affects the reaction was
temperature. When the temperature was increased, the
reaction rate also increased. Thus, temperature affects
the rate directly. Lastly, the addition of catalyst also
affected the reaction rate significantly because it rapidly
increased the reaction rate by decreasing its activation
energy.
References
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Kinetics/Rate_L
aws/Reaction_Mechanisms/Reaction_Mechanisms
Aiken, G., McKnight, D.M., Harnish, R., Wershaw, R., 1996.
Geochemistry of aquatic humic substances in the Lake Fryxell
Basin, Antarctica . Biogeochemistry 34, 157188.
as the
to react.
The last run which is adding of
CuS O 4
Ea
or the energy
required to react.
The results of this experiment did not display any
significant difference compared to the past studies.
There may be a small difference because it may be
/RJBCruz