Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
Aim. The aim of this study was toverify howlistening to instrumental asynchronous music, with tempoof 90bpm,can
affect the aerobic physical performance in elderly women
engaged in a continuous and constant exercising, predominantly aerobic, consisting of walking routines.
Methods. Twenty women(N.=20, age=75.84.2 years)volunteered to the study and underwent a six-week period of physical exercising. All women were previously sedentary, as they
had not trained systematically within the last 5 years. The
experimental group (Eg=10) performed all the exercise sessions and tests listening tomusic. The control group (Cg=10)
performed the same program without listening tomusic. Total distances covered, heart rates before and after the tests
andthe rates of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured.
Results. Significantdifferences between groups(P<0.01)were
foundin RPE. No statistically significant differenceswere observed in total distances covered and heart rates, although
there was an increase of 9.83% in the total distance covered
by the Eg compared to the Cg, in accordance with other previous researches.
Conclusion. The results are in line with those reported by
other authors in differentpopulations and ages, confirming
that music may be considered an important tool in supporting elderly people involved in physical exercising.
Key words: Music - Motor activity - Aged.
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
OTHER AREAS
n Italy, as well as in other Western and Europeancountries, the process ofageingisa social phenomenon ofgreat interest, because of allthe sociocultural and economic challenges that it presents.
The issues of health and preventive activities relatedtotheageing-related degenerative phenomena thus
becomeof increasinginterest toall the agenciesthat
deal with theelderly people. Physical activityis an
Corresponding author: Bruno Ruscello, PhD, Via dei Della Bitta 41,
00148 Rome, Italy. E-mail: bruno.ruscello@uniroma2.it
536
1TorVergataUniversityofRome
FacultyofMedicineandSurgery
SchoolofSportandExerciseScience, Rome, Italy
2FacultyofMotorSciences
SanRaffaeleUniversitTelematica, Rome, Italy
August 2014
RUSCELLO
The sample was then non-randomly split (convenience sampling) into two equal groups (control group,
Cg, N.=10; age=775.03 years and experimental
group, Eg, N.=10; age=74.63.06 years) for practical reasons, involving the structurewhich hostedthe
study: the groups were already formed, consequently
we decided to administer the music treatment only
to one of these existing groups, whose capacities
were tested (Table I). The initial conditions referring
to the investigated physical performance (walking:
total distance covered, TD), the heart rate, (HR, preand postexercise) and the rate of perceived exertion
(RPE) were preliminarly tested, in order to verify
the similarity of those initial conditions and to limit,
partially at least, the influence of the sampling procedure adopted. Participants were first subjected to a
medical check to exclude disabling diseases such as:
acute or chronic debilitating osteoarticulardiseases;
cardiopulmonary or neurological contraindications to physical activity, ranging from light to
moderate intensity.
Written informed consent was obtained from
each participant after the aims of the study were explained. After approval by the University of Rome
Tor Vergata Ethical Committee, the study was conducted in June-July 2011 at a nursing home situated
near Rome, Italy, in accordance with the principles
laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Before
undergoing the training and test procedures, all participants were requested to provide a certificate of
medical fitness.
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
Music alters emotional and physiological arousal and can therefore be used prior to competition
or training as a stimulant, or as a sedative to calm
up or anxious feelings.14 Research has consistently
shown that the synchronization of music with repetitive exercise is associated with increased levels of
work output. This applies to such activities as rowing, cycling, cross-country skiing, and running. Musical tempo can regulate movement and thus prolong
performance. Synchronizing movements with music
also enables athletes to perform more efficiently,
again resulting in greater endurance. Music can also
impact positively on the acquisition of motor skills.13
The type of music, synchronous or asynchronous 15-17andthe tempo, expressed inbeat per minute
(bpm),16, 10, 18 might have different effects on the performers, as several studies already proved.
The purpose of this research was to verify
how listening to instrumental asyncronous music,
withatempoof 90-100bpm,can affectthe physical
performancein elderly women,engagedin acontinuous and constant exercising, predominantly aerobic, consisting ofwalking routines.
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
All the tests and exercising sessions were performed indoors, in the climatized gym of the nursing-home, with an average temperature of 22 C.
Each group trained five days per week for six
Test n. 1
Test n. 2
Test n.3
Vol. 54 - No. 4
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
Mean
(m)
Standard Deviation
N.
206.00
202.00
271.50
255.00
315.50
284.50
21.19
42.37
46.67
29.81
48.33
35.15
10
10
10
10
10
10
537
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
weeks. After a warm-up routine of 15 minutes, walking for 20 minutes on a level treadmill (0 slope) was
considered the core part of each exercising session.
In the first stage of the study, (one week, five exercising sessions) participants were gradually familiarized with treadmill exercising (Panatta Sport, model
BORA, Macerata, Italy) and had the opportunity
to practice walking sessions set at their own pace.
They were also instructed to set the pace individually so to walk as far as you can in six minutes.19
To accomplish this task, participants were instructed
to volitionally increase or decrease the speed of the
treadmill, acting on the relevant control unit. This
was considered a sufficient learning period to avoid
a learning curve,19-21 influencing the validity of the
ongoing study.
In order to measure and compare changes in different aspects of the physical load sustained by the
participants over time (Total Distance reached, Heart
Rates, and RPE) the six minute walk test (6MWT)
performed on a treadmill was used.19, 22, 23, 25
The 6MWT evaluates the general and integrated
responses of the entire body during physical exercise, including the cardiovascular and pulmonary
systems, systemic and peripheral blood circulation,
neuromuscular units, and muscular metabolism.26, 27
The 6MWT is easily managed and well tolerated,
and it reflects activities of daily living better than
other walking tests do; this also applies to patients
with moderate to severe diseases.24
The tests were performed at the beginning of the
exercising period, after the first week of familiarization, after two weeks (intermediate stage), and after
six weeks (final stage).
The treadmill leveled at a 0 slope was used during all testing procedures. The total distance covered
(in meters) and the average speed (km/h) were automatically provided by the treadmill control unit, for
each individual participating.
The Heart Rate (HR) before and after the 6MWT
were recorded using portable cardio-frequency meters (Polar Electro Oy, RS 100, Kempele, Finland).
The Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was measured using the Borg CR-10 Scale 28-33 administered
within thirty minutes from the end of each testing
procedure. A score of ten represented the highest intensity, and a score of zero was the lowest intensity.
We used a scale ranging from zero to ten because
the participants found this notation system more fa-
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
RUSCELLO
538
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (MSD) and 95% Interval of Confidence
(IC95%). The assumption of normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Parametric and
nonparametric statistics were used when appropriate. Student t-test was performed to find significant
differences between groups.
The variables measured in the control
group(Cg)andExperimental Group(Eg) in performing the6MWTwere:the total distancereached (TD),
the heart rate(HR)recordedbefore andafter thetests
and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) measuredbya BorgCR-10 scale.
A 2x3 mixed factorial analysis of variancewas performed [Cg,Eg;Between] x [Repeated 6MWT;Within]. After performingthe Mauclhy Testof sphericity,
theGreenhouse-Geissere, was usedwhen appropriate.
The corresponding P values are provided for
each analysis. The value of statistical significance
was acceptedwith P0.05.
All data were statistically processed using SPSS
15.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
August 2014
Results
The twogroupsdiffer inmean age (74.63.06 vs.
77.05.03 years, EGandCG respectively), butthis
difference is not statisticallysignificant (t14.8=-1.288;
P=0.214; IC 95%=-6.37-1.57; ES=0.57).
Total distances covered
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
The descriptive statistics (MSD) for the distance covered in the three tests performed by the
twogroups arereported(Table I). Mean valuesand
standard errorsof the tests performed are also provided (Figure 1).There is a clearimprovement inphysical performance in both groups over time (within),
with increases of34% (Experimental Group-listening tomusic)and 28% (control group - not listening
tomusic).
This improvement was statistically significant (mixed factorial analysis of variance 2x3:
F1.439,18=44.42; P0.001; partial h2=0.71; power
1.000 with a=0.05 with adjustment GreenhouseGeisser e). Differences between groups on total
distance covered during the tests were found (with
a percentage of difference of 1.94%, 6.08% and
9.83%at the first,second andthird test respectively)
but they were not statistically significant (F1,18=1.89;
P=0.118; partial h2=0.095; power=0.257 with
a=0.05) (Figure 2).
RUSCELLO
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
Figure 1.Total distance (TD) covered during 6MW Test (Mean and Standard Error).
Differences in % (Eg-Cg) are reported.
Vol. 54 - No. 4
539
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
Figure 2.Total distances covered during the three tests. Estimated marginal means (Mixed Factorial Anova) in Eg and in Cg. Note
the different trends between the groups, with a clear improvement in Eg.
Table II.Heart rates (bpm) recorded before the tests (6MWT).
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
RUSCELLO
Groups
Mean
Std. Deviation
Diff. %
(Eg-Cg)
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
82.90
81.00
80.90
80.60
76.70
77.20
5.24
5.03
4.51
5.19
5.81
6.20
10
10
10
10
10
10
-2.35%
540
-0.37%
0.65%
August 2014
Groups
Vol. 54 - No. 4
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
RUSCELLO
Mean
Std. Deviation
N.
Diff. %
(Eg-Cg)
105.00
101.20
101.60
98.20
101.10
98.90
5.64
6.73
6.70
5.71
5.65
9.46
10
10
10
10
10
10
3.62%
3.35%
2.18%
541
Table IV.RPE: Borg Cr-10 scores, recorded after the three Tests (MSD).
Groups
Mean
Std. Deviation
Diff. %
(Eg Cg)
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
Experimental group
Control group
7.30
7.90
4.80
6.10
2.30
5.20
0.82
1.20
1.03
0.88
0.48
0.63
10
10
10
10
10
10
7.59%
21.31%
55.77%
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
Figure 5.RPE scores (CR-10 Borg scale). Differences (%) between groups (Eg-Cg) observed over time.
ing load (Table I). Improvementshave beencontinuous and progressiveover time,during allthe testsfor
both groups (P0.001). Different factors might have
been contributing to these final results, among them
we suggestthe following:
a global learning effect in participants about
walking on a treadmill (better motor coordination);
improvement of fitness, stimulated by the exercising load over time, especially considering the
declared sedentary habits of the participants.
Although no statistically significant differences
were found between groups in term of performance, however we underline the emerging trend, on
the third test the most, where the difference between
groups reached its maximal spread (9.83%). This
difference, although not statistically significant in
this study (F1.18=2.69; P=0.118), seems to strongly
support the idea that listening to music while exercising might be of a positive effect on performance,
as already reported in different populations and
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
RUSCELLO
542
August 2014
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
RUSCELLO
Figure 6.RPE. Estimated marginal means (Mixed Factorial Anova) in Eg and in Cg. Note the different trends between the groups,
with a clear decrease in Eg, in third test the most.
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
Vol. 54 - No. 4
Conclusions
543
of the fear of excessive fatigue. Therefore we encourage those practitioners involved in the elderly health/
fitness care to use music as a powerful tool in order
to promote physical activity as a regular habit of life.
The limited sampleof this studyplaces thisresearch
as apilot study forfuture investigations, nevertheless
the findings we reported in our study seem to substantially agree with similar findings reported in different
studies investigating different ages and populations.
IN
C ER
O V
P A
Y
R M
IG E
H DI
T C
A
References
This document is protected by international copyright laws. No additional reproduction is authorized. It is permitted for personal use to download and save only one file and print only one copy of this Article. It is not permitted to make additional copies
(either sporadically or systematically, either printed or electronic) of the Article for any purpose. It is not permitted to distribute the electronic copy of the article through online internet and/or intranet file sharing systems, electronic mailing or any other
means which may allow access to the Article. The use of all or any part of the Article for any Commercial Use is not permitted. The creation of derivative works from the Article is not permitted. The production of reprints for personal or commercial use is
not permitted. It is not permitted to remove, cover, overlay, obscure, block, or change any copyright notices or terms of use which the Publisher may post on the Article. It is not permitted to frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo,
or other proprietary information of the Publisher.
RUSCELLO
544
August 2014