Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Iyad Mohammad (2004): The Theory of Perception in the Aesthetic Conception
of Helmut Lachenmann: A 'Redefinition' Trial of the 'Functional' Aspect of Music, Contemporary
Music Review, 23:3-4, 91-95
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0749446042000285708
One of the main keys to understanding the works of the contemporary German
composer Helmut Lachenmann is his concept of musical perception, in which he
develops a new type of music listening, a new approach to the essence of this art and
its functions in modern society. Working out a new attitude of man toward music is
an issue that is central to some of Lachenmanns most celebrated essays. Wholly
dedicated to this subject are such articles as Vier Grundbestimmungen des
Musikhorens (Four fundamental provisions for listening, 1979), Horen ist
ber Moglichkeiten und Schwierigkeiten (Listening is
wehrlosohne Horen. U
defenceless without listening. On possibilities and difculties, 1985) and Herausforderungen an das Horen (Gesprach mit Reinhold Urmetzer) (The challenges of
listening [conversation with Reinhold Urmetzer], 1991), all of which appear in the
1996 collection of Lachenmanns writings, Musik als existentielle Erfahrung. In his
articles the composer strives for an innovative conception of listening that embodies
the existential idea of acting out of knowledge and, as such, differs from the
traditional understanding of listening as a passive act of perception. According to
Lachenmann, listening is a process of perception, in which the composer, as well as
the performer and listener, touches his way through the musical material together
with the factors predetermining its tonal, corporal, structural and associative
ISSN 0749-4467 (print)/ISSN 1477-2256 (online) 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd
DOI: 10.1080/0749446042000285708
92
I. Mohammad
contexts, at the same time opposing himself to the latter. While in this process of
recognising the factors that predetermine the character of the musical material, the
listener becomes aware of his own predetermination, of the inner factors that
predetermine his act of perception itself and thus limit the range (scope) of his
apprehension and experiencing of earlier unknown musical events. To listen, writes
Lachenmann (1996, pp. 117 118),
means to discover ones own ability to change and to oppose it against the just
recognised non-freedom as a resistance; to listen means to rediscover oneself,
means to change oneself. . .. It is a question of a new, a changed perception.
What has been called here the process of touching ones way through the musical
material is what Lachenmann names in German abtasten, one of the main
compositional categories of the composers aesthetics. It indicates both the cognitive
and physical aspects of the process. The word awakens the image of a blind man
trying to construct in his mind a viewa picture of the world around him without
being able to really see itonly by using the sense of touch. One might even be
reminded of Maurice Maeterlincks Les Aveugles. Hearing, performing and
composing become processes of touching the way through the offered and given
musical material, through the composition and through the structures and relations
existing in it. Thus they are described as acts of searching and exploration, as
cognition.
The material side of this touching is on one hand closely related to the purely
physical and acoustic features of the musical material, named by the composer in
Vier Grundbestimmungen des Musikhorens as corporeality (Korperlichkeit)
(Lachenmann, 1996, p. 58). This term, dened in his later article Zum Problem
des Strukturalismus (On the problem of structuralism, 1990) as the acousticphysical experience (Lachenmann, 1996, p. 88), generalises in its turn the acoustic
experience of Lachenmanns classication of sound-types made in his early article
Klangtypen der Neuen Musik (Sound types of New Music, 1966). On the other
hand, it is not less related to the extremely material, physical attitude of Lachenmann
toward musical instruments that materialises in his unique world of sound referred to
by him as musique concre`te instrumentale.
No less determined by Lachenmanns material approach to musical categories is
the cognitive aspect of touching. The choice of the word abtasten itself is very
signicant. The direct material impression it gives and the sensuality it attributes to
94
I. Mohammad
function of musical form, rather than the traditional constructive one. The music of
Lachenmann is one of gradually unfolding structural and acoustic processes. Each of
the innovative acoustic and technical elements for which Lachenmanns music has
come to be famous is not as important in itself as its context within a compositional
process, whether acoustic or technical. The what of the musical event is subordinated
to its how, to the issue of organisation of the material in time. The qualitative aspect
of the musical material is what is organised and developed in the musical process; it is
the manifestation of the latter.
This analogy between the relation of the qualitative aspect and the overall process
of the act of perception on the one hand and the musical material and compositional
technique on the other is related to the basic structural orientation of Lachenmanns
thinking.
As structural experience hearing is orientated not only positively toward the
qualitative aspects of the acoustic object, but explores the position of this object in
its surrounding. The perception of music becomes narrower or wider simultaneously with these interrelations, unfolding themselves in time and space between
it and the nearer and farther surrounding. (Lachenmann, 1996, p. 118)
Lachenmann, H. (1996). Musik als existentielle Erfahrung. Schriften 1966 1995 (J. Hausler, Ed.).
Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Hartel.