Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................4
2.
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.
4.
5.
4.2
APPENDIX A1:
APPENDIX A2:
APPENDIX A3:
Page 2 of 35
Page 3 of 35
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
National Grid has approached UK Power Networks to request that the 132kV dual circuit overhead line between
Twinstead Tee and Burstall Bridge be transferred to National Grid ownership to be dismantled and replaced by a
400kV overhead line.
This document provides information to demonstrate what is necessary to allow UK Power Networks to continue to
provide a safe and reliable electricity supply to homes and businesses in the area following the transfer of the 132kV
dual circuit overhead line along with technical, environmental and economical comparison of alternative
reconfigurations or reinforcement options. In addition it details the recommended proposal to construct a new
400/132kV Substation to the West of Twinstead, Essex.
The existing 132kV double circuit currently runs open, with the HV bows broken at tower PCB16 in an area known as
Burstall Bridge, approximately 3km from Bramford substation. The removal of the 132kV circuits to Bramford will
result in an increased risk to the supply of existing customers and UK Power Networks not complying with the
distribution networks planning standard P2/6, a requirement by Ofgem for a licence to operate an electricity
distribution network. This planning standard requires there to be back up capacity so that if a circuit faults or needs
to be closed down for maintenance a second circuit can provide sufficient power based on normal summer usage.
The removal of the existing line results in insufficient 33kV transfer capacity to cater for a summer second circuit
outage (N-2) of the 132kV overhead line between Pelham and Thaxted Grid. It is also expected that Belchamp Grid
will be transferred to Bramford GSP on a permanent basis to maintain P2/6 compliance as the 132kV circuit from
Belchamp Tee to Bramford already provides the required transfer capability
Each potential option has been assessed to ensure that it meets the need case to provide an alternative supply to
the existing 132kV circuits, that the resultant distribution system is compliant with the various statutory and licence
obligations and does not leave UK Power Networks customers at a greater risk.
It has been confirmed that a new Grid Supply Point (GSP), a substation where UK Power Networks takes energy from
National Grid at 400kV and steps it down to 132kV for distribution locally, in the vicinity of Twinstead is the
appropriate distribution network reinforcement that should be considered in the context of transferring the existing
132kV overhead line between Twinstead Tee and Burstall Bridge. It has been determined that a 400/132kV Super
Grid Transformer (SGT) connected to a single section 132kV busbar via a SGT LV circuit breaker with two 132kV
feeder circuit breakers to the existing 132kV OHL is the preferred initial configuration for Twinstead GSP, to be
designed to accommodate future expansion as the DNO network evolves. It is proposed to run the new GSP in
parallel to Pelham with the bus coupler open at Pelham Grid Supply Point.
Page 4 of 35
UK Power Networks (EDF Energy Networks at the time) were requested to undertake an investigation into whether the
ownership of the 132kV double circuit overhead line could be transferred to National Grid. An initial report was
produced by UK Power Networks in 2009 which identified several viable solutions and served as the basis for route
feasibility studies.
Initial results recommended the transfer of Belchamp and Thaxted Grid to the new GSP, equipped with a 132kV
double busbar and supplied by two 400/132kV 240MVA Super Grid Transformers (SGT). This configuration is
reviewed as part of this document in light of further information regarding planned modifications to the 400kV
network and the impact of a revised 132kV running arrangement on the distribution network.
The UKPN business case supersedes the previous reports and is built around the following structure:
Section 2
Brief explanation of the 132kV and 33kV network for the Pelham/Wymondley GSP group;
Reasoning behind reinforcement projects currently in the NAMP plan;
Compliance issues arising from the transfer and removal of the 132kV circuits between
Twinstead Tee and Burstall Bridge;
Section 3
Review of strategic options;
Section 4
Evaluation of the strategic options;
Recommended option for a new 400/132kV GSP near Twinstead;
Technical assessment of the different configurations and running arrangements for Twinstead;
2.1
770/843 A
176/193 MVA
Due to the predominantly rural nature of this area of North Essex, especially in the vicinity of Twinstead and Castle
Hedingham, the distribution network is predominantly radial with long lengths of 11kV overhead line supplied from
small/medium size primary substations with firm capacity below 24MVA such as Cornard, Halstead and Wethersfield
primaries and larger load centres in the towns of Sudbury, Haverhill and Saffron Walden. These primaries are fed
from three different Grid substations of Braintree, Belchamp and Thaxted and are part of two different GSP groups of
Pelham - Wymondley and Braintree.
<PCB211>
<PCB273>
<PCB323>
<P
CB
5
>
Braintree GSP is equipped with 2x240MVA 400/132kV SGT and is interconnected with Rayleigh GSP via a double
circuit 132kV overhead line fitted with 175mm2 ACSR conductors (PSB-PSA) with a 2.2km section of 500mm2 OF Cu
cable and supplies Braintree local (2x90MVA), Chelmsford North (2x30/30MVA), Chelmsford East no2 (1x90MVA)
and BR Springfield (1 x 14MVA) rail load. Braintree forms a P2/6 Class D with an average cold spell (ACS) maximum
Page 5 of 35
2.2
Overall Pelham - Wymondley network comprises seven 132/33kV Grid substations with associated 33/11kV primary
substations and a 132/25kV Grid substation which form a P2/6 Class E supply group with an average cold spell
(ACS) maximum winter corrected demand of 492.6MW in winter 2010/11. According to the 2011 Planning Load
Estimates (PLE) the demand is expected to reach 591MW in 2021/22 (figure 2).
MW
700.0
600.0
500.0
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
Actual
0.0
05/06
07/08
Predicted
09/10
11/12
13/14
15/16
17/18
19/20
21/22
23/24
25/26 Year
Figure 2. Pelham & Wymondley - Winter Maximum Demand (Actual and Predicted)
Page 6 of 35
The existing network is in compliance with P2/6 security of supply. The 132kV circuits between Pelham and Bramford
run normally open at the tower PCB16 and this configuration can be altered by making the HV bows on the tower as
part of pre outage planning scenarios to guarantee supply to the group while works on other 132kV sections are
taking place, a situation that will occur more frequently as the load in the system increases.
A P2/6 assessment of the existing running arrangement has been carried out for various winter First Circuit Outage
(FCO) and summer Second Circuit Outage (SCO) taking into account the predicted loads up to 2020 as per the table
below.
P2/6 Scenario
Exit Point
Fault scenario
Pelham 132kV
Wymondley 132kV
Pelham 132kV
Wymondley 132kV
No significant issues arise for both 3 phase and earth fault studies.
No issues of note
No issues of note
P2/6 assessment
The loss of Pelham SGT1 results in 851A (97% rating) flowing between
Pelham and Wymondley 132kV ;
P2/6 assessment
SCO Summer 2016
LETCHWORTH
132/33kV S/S
MELBOURNE
BELCHAMP
132/33kV S/S
WYMONDLEY
GRID
THAXTED
799/875 A
181/199 MVA
132/33kV S/S
WYMONDLEY GSP
751 A
517 A
679 A
400/132kV S/S
2x240MVA SGT
132/33kV S/S
132/33kV S/S
354 A
NO.1
PELHAM GSP
NO.1
447 A
NO.2
400/132kV S/S
2x240MVA SGT
NO.2
433/539 A
99/123 MVA
112 A
STEVENAGE
153 A
290 A
156 A
745/925 A
172/211 MVA
123 A
BISHOPS
STORTFORD
132/33kV S/S
269 A
433/539 A
99/123 MVA
HV Bows Off
25kV
BR UGLEY
132/33kV S/S
2.3
The combined demand of Thaxted and Belchamp is expected to increase due to new developments, in particular due
to connection activity and developments at Haverhill and Sudbury, supplied from Belchamp Grid. The 400mm2
section of the PCB circuit between Pelham and Thaxted is rated at 211MVA and the 2010 combined demand reached
163MVA in winter 2010/11. According to the estimates, the demand will reach the circuit capacity in 2021/22.
LETCHWORTH
132/33kV S/S
MELBOURNE
BELCHAMP
132/33kV S/S
WYMONDLEY
GRID
THAXTED
799/875 A
181/199 MVA
132/33kV S/S
WYMONDLEY GSP
400/132kV S/S
2x240MVA SGT
265 A
227 A
NO.1
PELHAM GSP
NO.1
540 A
337 A
NO.2
400/132kV S/S
2x240MVA SGT
NO.2
433/539 A
99/123 MVA
STEVENAGE
132/33kV S/S
132/33kV S/S
132/33kV S/S
112 A
921 A
465 A
745/925 A
172/211 MVA
123 A
BISHOPS
STORTFORD
132/33kV S/S
433/539 A
99/123 MVA
HV Bows Off
25kV
BR UGLEY
Page 8 of 35
2.4
The combined winter demand of Thaxted and Belchamp is classed as group D under ENA recommendation P2/6
security of supply, with a peak demand of 163MW as seen on the 132kV circuits from Pelham GSP in 2010 (20th
December). At present there is no generation connected at 33/132kV in the area to be taken into account and there
is limited interconnection to Thaxted and Belchamp Group to support the load in the event of summer N-2 scenario
for the loss of the 132kV circuits between Pelham GSP and Thaxted. The minimum demand to be met in this group
under outage conditions is detailed in the P2/6 table below:
Circuit outage
Within 3 hours: Smaller of Group demand minus 100MW or 1/3 Group demand
54.3MW (1/3 of Winter demand)
Within time to restore arranged outage: Group Demand
Network modelling results are shown below, for a N-2 scenario for the 132kV circuits between Pelham and Thaxted
with a combined demand of 103.7MVA equivalent to 2011 summer maximum demand. This scenario results in the
loss of Thaxted, Belchamp and a rail supply incoming circuits and enabling the backfeed by series of remote/manual
switching on the 33kV network to supply the affected areas from Bury, Braintree and Stowmarket Grid substations.
Belchamp Grid
A total of 22.5MVA demand can be permanently supported for a N-2 on the 132kV circuits from
Pelham to Thaxted Grid via switching of the normal open points, excluding the demand from
Groton T2 and Boxted T1 which is normally supplied from Bury Grid and Stowmarket Grid:
16.5MVA support available from Bury Grid on the Boxted T2 single circuit by remote control
of 33kV circuit breakers and manual switching of the 33kV isolators. Circuit total length via
Boxted Primary is 23km and via Drinkstone tee is 42km.
6MVA support available from Stowmarket Grid on the Hadleigh T1 / Groton T1 single circuit
by manual switching of 33kV disconnector. 33kV total circuit length via Groton Primary is
24km.
A total of 38.4MVA demand can be temporarily supported via rota shed. This includes the town
of Haverhill and Sudbury.
Page 9 of 35
A total of 30MVA demand can be permanently supported for a N-2 of the 132kV circuits from
Pelham to Thaxted Grid:
14.2MVA support available from Braintree Grid on the Halstead tee/Wethersfield dual circuit
by manual switching of 33kV isolators. 33kV total circuit length via Wethersfield Primary is
26km.
15.8VA support available from Braintree Grid on the West Braintree / Dunmow Primary dual
circuit by manual switching of 33kV. 33kV total circuit length via Dunmow tee is 26.5km.
A total of 12.7MVA demand can be supported temporarily via rota shed for Saffron Walden and
Acrows primaries.
In summary, a total of 52.5MVA demand can be permanently supported following a series of manual and remote
switching. This equates to approximately 48.5MW which is below the requirements of P2/6 of 54.3MW. The removal
of the 132kV circuits to Bramford will result in insufficient 33kV transfer capacity to cater for a summer second circuit
outage (N-2) of the SMA/PCB overhead line between Pelham and Thaxted Grid and P2/6 non compliance of the
Thaxted and Belchamp group.
In addition, UKPN cannot guarantee that the required Grid substations and all seven 33kV circuits mentioned above
will be available to support the required demand and that the voltage on the 11kV feeders, emanating from the
substations supplied via rota shed, will be within limits.
The figure below illustrates the areas normally supplied from Belchamp and Thaxted Grid and the effect of a 132kV
N-2 scenario in terms of areas that can be permanently supplied or areas under rota shed (4h supply rota to
individual primary substations). This result in the loss of the rail supply and approximately 35,180 customers
supplied via rota shed and a substantial impact in the towns of Haverhill, Sudbury and Saffron Walden with a
combined population above 50,000.
WRATTING
HAVERHIL
ACROWS
SAFFRON WALDEN
WIXDE
PUMPING
SUDBURY
132kV N-2
Page 10 of 35
UK Power Networks investigated several options that could resolve the predicted compliance issues. The range of
options considered at the initial investigation stage included the creation of a new Grid Supply Point as well as the
extension of the 132kV network infrastructure and will be the subject of a revaluation as part of this briefing paper. A
summary of the following options is available in Appendix A3:
Reference
Option
Option 1
Do Nothing
Option 2
Option 3
Option 4
Option 5
4.2
Reinforce Braintree GSP and install new 132kV circuits to Rushley Green
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.2.1
5.2.1
Option 6
Option 7
Option 8
New Grid Supply Point at Earls Colne (New 132kV OHL circuits)
New Grid Supply Point at Earls Colne (New 132KV UG circuits)
Option 1 - Do Nothing
This option covers UK Power Networks transfer of the 132kV circuits between Twinstead and Burstall Bridge without
appropriate distribution network reinforcement in place. The existing 132kV double circuit provides up to
198/246MVA of transfer capacity (summer/winter on a double 132kV circuit) between Pelham-Wymondley Group
and Bramford, sufficient to provide a firm supply to Thaxted and Belchamp Grid substations and maintain both Grid
substations supplied during 132kV outage scenarios.
This option has been rejected because it would be in breach UKPNs distribution licence condition in terms of
security of supply as it results in P2/6 non compliance of the class D group. The current infrastructure is unable to
permanently support the demand at Belchamp and Thaxted Grids without the backup offered by the 132kV circuits to
Bramford and would increase the risk of loss of supply to the existing customers.
Option 2 - Replace 132kV circuits between Twinstead Tee and Burstall Bridge
Option 2 would maintain the existing N-1 transfer capacity between Pelham and Bramford by the replacement of an
existing 26km of 132kV double circuit overhead line with two 132kV underground circuits to PCB5 near Bramford
GSP.
Page 11 of 35
This option has been discounted due to the high cost, environmental impact, complex wayleave negotiations and
long timescale.
Page 12 of 35
Option 3.1
To fully implement option 3.1, new 132kV circuits are required between Twinstead and Lawford 132kV. This option
involves:
a.
Page 13 of 35
Option 3.2
To fully implement option 3.2, new 132kV circuits are required between Twinstead and Abberton 132kV. This option
involves:
a. Installation of two 132kV circuits along a 22km route.
Option 3.2.1 is for an overhead line route with 175mm2 conductors each capable of 99/123MVA;
Option 3.2.2 is for an underground route with single core cables with a minimum size of 300mm Al,
each capable of 107/126MVA, in ducted trefoil formation, 20% in carriage way;
b. Construction of a 132kV terminal tower and modifications to existing 132kV towers east of Belchamp Tee;
c. Modification to the existing 132kV OHL near Bramford;
Summary of Option 3.1.1 and 3.1.2
Route length 22km (minimum). Route initially assessed.
Capacity available through connection: 198/246MVA (OHL) or 214/252MVA (UG);
Environmental and ecological issues:
o Close proximity to the Dedham vale area of outstanding natural beauty;
o Close proximity to Ancient woodland areas and identified archaeological areas;
Special Engineering Difficulties
o Crossing of the Bramford Rayleigh Pelham 400kV circuit;
o River crossings: Colne and Roman;
o Major roads: A12, A1124 A120, A1071;
o Network rail: London Liverpool street main line and Sudbury Marks Tey rural line.
A detailed assessment is required to identify reinforcement of the 132kV circuits and increased SGT capacity
on the Bramford/Rayleigh group depending on the location of the 132kV injection at Colchester.
Estimate cost of reinforcement works at Bramford is 12.8m for reinforcing the 132kV circuit from Lawford to
Bramford and 45m for 132kV switchgear replacement due to fault level.
Estimate costs for reinforcement of the 132kV circuits to Rayleigh is 50m.
Option 3.2.1 132kV Overhead line, Estimate cost 21.3m
Estimate total cost including reinforcement works at Bramford is 79m
Estimate total cost including 132kV reinforcement works towards Rayleigh is 75m
Estimate time to implement 6-7 years (2-3 years consents negotiations, 3-4 years approval + construction)
Option 3.2.2 132kV Underground cable, Estimate cost 38.5m
Page 14 of 35
Page 15 of 35
132kV N-2
Option 4.1
The 33kV network is restricted by the long length and small section of overhead line to Grid sources that form part of
different supply groups. An option to resolve the 33kV constraints would be to replace the existing small conductors
with larger ones, capable of providing extra capacity and with lower impedance that would result in increased voltage
support. This option would involve installing remote switching in the network and replacing the limiting overhead
line circuits.
Estimate total cost of reinforcement at 33kV is 9.4m. Studies suggest that completing the above works would
resolve the circuit overloads and provide 7MVA of additional capacity, capable of supporting the demand increase
up to 2017 but would result in 11kV voltage outside of statutory limits at Haverhill (10.3kV) and Cornard (10.17kV).
This option has been discounted due to technical constraints in particular 300mm2 construction or upgrade, voltage
limitations, inability to permanently supply Haverhill, Sudbury and Saffron Walden for a N-2 on the 132kV OHL and is
seen as a loss of capacity when compared to the capacity provided by the existing 132kV circuits.
Option 4.2
33kV interconnection from Belchamp and Thaxted can be enhanced by constructing new 33kV interconnectors. There
are several projects within UKPN investment plan to provide additional circuits and improve the resilience of the
network within the area and enhance 33kV interconnection.
Estimate total cost of reinforcement at 33kV is 20m. Like option 4.1, the increase in interconnection would resolve
the immediate issues but wont provide sufficient capacity to cater for the developments expected in the area.
This option has been discounted due to technical constraints (voltage limitations), inability to permanently supply
Haverhill, Sudbury and Saffron Walden for a N-2 on the 132kV OHL and limited capacity increase.
Option 5.1
New 132kV dual circuits between Braintree and the 132kV PCB OHL
To fully implement option 5.1, new 132kV circuits are required between Braintree GSP and the PCB overhead line. A
desktop route feasibility study was done in 2010 in response to National Grid East Anglia generation connection
enquires which indentified several overhead line routes. This option involves:
a.
Installation of two 132kV circuits between Braintree and the 132kV PCB OHL:
Option 5.1.1 is for a overhead line with 175mm2 conductors each capable of 99/123MVA along a 18km
route;
Option 5.1.2 is for an underground route with single core cables with a minimum size of 300mm Al,
each capable of 107/126MVA, in ducted trefoil formation along a 17km route, 50% in carriage way;
b. For the underground solution: 5 directional drills;
c. Construction of a 132kV terminal tower and modifications to existing 132kV towers east of Belchamp Tee;
d. Modification to the existing 132kV OHL near Bramford;
Page 17 of 35
Figure 10. Simplified single line diagram for Option 5.1 and 5.2
This option has been discounted due to the high cost, high risk factor (archaeological and environmental), complex
wayleave negotiations and long timescale.
Option 5.2
To fully implement option 5.2, new 132kV overhead line circuits are required between Coggeshall and the PCB
circuits. A desktop route feasibility study was done in 2010 in response to National Grid East Anglia generation
connection enquires which indentified several overhead line routes. This option involves:
a.
Braintree GSP
Coggeshall Grid
New
Figure 11. Simplified single line diagram for Option 5.1 and 5.2 (132kV connections shown)
This option has been discounted due high risk factor (archaeological and environmental), complex wayleave
negotiations, long timescale and public awareness of new 132kV overhead lines.
Summary of Option 6
132kV Route length between 200m and 1.5km, dependant on the site location;
Capacity available through connection: 198/246MVA (restricted by the existing 132kV OHL circuit);
Wayleave consents are required for site 3;
Environmental and ecological issues:
o Close proximity to Ancient woodland areas;
Special Engineering Difficulties
o No major engineering difficulties indentified.
This option has been previously discussed with National Grid who appointed TEP to undertake an environmental and
planning assessment of the feasibility of sitting a new Grid Supply Point between Twinstead Tee and Thaxted. Out of
a total of 9 potential sites, the study identified 3 sites to further investigate.
Page 19 of 35
Twinstead GSP
3
Figure 12. Simplified single line diagram for Option 6 including the 3 identified sites
GSP Site 1 Butlers Wood and Waldegrave Wood: The 400kV overhead line runs between the two woodlands and
there is insufficient space for the GSP beneath the line but potential sites have been identified in the immediate
vicinity of the overhead line and directly accessible from the A131. The dense woodland at Butlers and Waldegrave
Wood offers screening potential. This site is the furthest away from the 132kV overhead line, approximately 1.5km.
GSP Site 2 Delvyns Lane: This site is adjacent to Ramacre Wood approximately 1.5km to the north east of Castle
Hedingham and is a field currently used for pasture. The site is sufficiently sized to accommodate the footprint of the
GSP. The existing 400kV overhead line passes to the north of Ramacre Wood and the 132kV overhead line crosses
the south west corner of the site.
GSP Site 3 Colne Valley Farm Park: A site adjacent to the A1017 on the fringes of urban development at Castle
Hedingham and adjacent to the existing overhead line to the north of Colne Valley Farm Park, a tourist attraction
featuring rare breeds and including a woodland picnic area and a walk along the River Colne. A flood risk zone
associated with the river covers part of the site. Both the 400kV and the 132kV OHL are located in the vicinity.
Estimate cost for UK Power Networks elements:
Site 1:
3.6m (2x1000mm2 Al 132kV underground circuits, 1500m in length)
Site 2/3: 2.3m (2x1000mm2 Al 132kV underground circuits, 200m in length)
Estimate time to implement 3-4 years (1 year consents negotiations, 3 years approval + construction)
A geographical overview and photos of the sites are included in Appendix A2. This is the recommended option and
will be investigated further in section 6 of this document.
Coggeshall
GSP
Figure 13. Simplified single line diagram for Option 5.1 and 5.2 (132kV connections shown)
Page 21 of 35
Page 22 of 35
Earls Colne
GSP
Figure 14. Simplified single line diagram for Option 5.1 and 5.2 (132kV connections shown)
Page 23 of 35
The options evaluation takes into account several criteria which consider relevant technical aspects, financial,
deliverability, environmental and interactions with National Grid reinforcement programme.
Each potential option has been assessed to ensure that it meets the need case to provide an alternative supply to
the existing 132kV circuits between Twinstead Tee and Bramford and that the resultant distribution system is
compliant with the various statutory and licence obligations. The implications on both the local and regional
distribution system have been fully assessed and the impact on the current infrastructure development plan is
understood.
4.1
Recommended Option
It has been confirmed that Option 6 for a new Grid Supply Point in the proximity of Twinstead is the appropriate
distribution network reinforcement that should be considered in the context of transferring the existing 132kV
overhead line between Twinstead Tee and Burstall Bridge.
The configuration of a new Grid Supply Point will depend on technical and operational considerations. Several
configurations and running arrangements have been initially considered and are detailed in the table below along
with the justification for non acceptance:
Configuration of a new GSP
Comments
Outcome
Reject
Reject
This option provides a limited use of the SGTs at Twinstead and no further
benefit to variations 1, 2 and 3. Possible voltage step change issues.
Reject
This option provides a limited use of the SGTs at Twinstead and no further
benefit to variations 1, 2 and 3. Possible voltage step change issues.
Reject
Recommended
Considered
Considered
Considered
Page 24 of 35
Several 132kV running arrangement have been analysed for the Twinstead-Pelham-Wymondley Group which also
provide further justification to the 132kV at Twinstead GSP.
The preferred arrangement is for the 132kV busbar to run solid where fault level constraints permit and for all SGT to
run in parallel. A typical double busbar arrangement is employed providing main and reserve busbars each with a
bus section circuit breaker thereby providing discrete sections of the busbar to which a SGT is connected. The main
and reserve busbar are coupled by means of a bus coupling circuit breaker. This configuration applies to both AIS
and GIS designs.
It has been determined that a 400/132kV SGT connected to a single section 132kV busbar with two 132kV feeder
circuit breakers to the existing 132kV OHL is the preferred initial configuration for Twinstead GSP designed to
accommodate future expansion to a 2xSGT and a double busbar 132kV with at least 4 feeder breakers as the DNO
network evolves.
The estimate total cost of the option is dependant on the location of the Grid Supply Point and is between 20.2 and
21.5m:
Substation Site
5.
NG S/S element
3x132kV CB
2x132kV cct
Estimate total
cost
17.9m
3.6m
21.5m
17.9m
2.3m
20.2m
17.9m
2.3m
20.2m
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
Reference
Description
Appendix A1
Appendix A2
Appendix A3
DOCUMENTS
Date
Description
October 2009
October 2009
June 2011
June 2011
Bramford to Twinstead Tee Need case for the east Anglia region
Page 25 of 35
Page 26 of 35
Site 1
~1.5km
Page 27 of 35
Site 2
Page 28 of 35
Site 3
PCB123 132kV
Page 29 of 35
PCB 88B
PCB 88A
Page 30 of 35
Page 31 of 35
Brief description
Option 1 - Do Nothing
N/A
Scope of Works
N/A
Major Risks
The current infrastructure is unable to permanently support the demand at Belchamp and
Thaxted Grids without the backup offered by the 132kV circuits to Bramford.
Cost / Time
Result
N/A
Discount
Rejected
Rejected
Page 32 of 35
Rejected
Rejected
The increase in interconnection would resolve the immediate issues but wont provide
sufficient capacity to cater for the developments expected in the area
Rejected
Option 5 - Reinforce Braintree GSP and install new 132kV circuits to Rushley Green
Common works for option 5:
Maintain the existing N-1 transfer
capacity between Pelham and Bramford
a. Modifications to the 400kV arrangement at Braintree
by the replacement of the existing 26km
by National Grid;
of 132kV double circuit overhead line
b. Installation of a 3rd 400/132kV SGT by National Grid;
with two 132kV circuits to Braintree GSP
c. Installation of two 132kV circuit breakers and
associated equipment;
Page 33 of 35
Rejected
Rejected
Recomm
end
Page 34 of 35
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Option 8 - New Grid Supply Point at Earls Colne
a.
Creation of a new Grid Supply Point near
b.
Earls Colne, supplied from the 400kV
c.
circuits Bramford-Rayleigh.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Rejected
Rejected
Page 35 of 35