Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
Z=
Z1 Z 2 .
Z1 + Z 2
(1)
Z stub =
jZ line
tan r
2
(2)
Z1 Z 2
Z i ,i +1
Z
= 0 ,
J i ,i +1
(3)
50 Access
Port 1
Port 2
Z0
J 0,1
J1, 2
J 2,3
J 3, 4
J 4,5
Z0
with
J 0,1 =
J j , j +1 =
J 4,5 =
GA b w
g 0 g1 w1
(4)
wb
(5)
w1 g j g j +1
GB b w
g 4 g 5 w1
Z C1 = Z C 2
ZC2 = Z0
(6)
(50 in our
terminating
1 when the
the lowpass
tan 2
tan 2
l1
0
l
2
0
(7)
(R S )
(8)
with
R=
l2
l
1 + tan 2 2 2
0
0
tan 2
l1
l1
2
1 + tan 2
S=
0
0
tan 2
(9)
l2
0
l
1
0
(10)
Low frequency
resonators
50 Access
50 Access
Inverter 0,1
Inverter 1,2
Inverter 4,5
Inverter 3,4
Inverter 2,3
High frequency
resonators
f0
Fractional bandwidth
1 GHz
-20
f1
0.7 GHz
f2
1.3 GHz
Characteristic impedance
Z0
50
15%
A. Principle
The use of the multilayer technology for this filter has two
important advantages: the circuits size reduction and the
possibility of create electromagnetic couplings between non
adjacent resonators (DBRs). Fig. 6 illustrates the concept of
this electromagnetic coupling applied to the fourth order filter
[12].
TABLE I.
f0
-40
-60
Measured S
-80
-100
21
Measured S11
Simulated S21
f1
f2
1.4
1.2
1
Frequency [GHz]
0.8
0.6
0.4
Simulated S11
1.8
1.6
J1,3
Z0
J 0,1
J1, 2
J 2,3
J 3, 4
J 4,5
Z0
J 2, 4
Figure 6. Coupling between non-adjacent resonators [12].
TABLE II.
Impedance
()
Width
(mm)
Length
(mm)
42.9
3.7
58.1
92.6
0.8
33
40.8
40.3
38.5
4.35
40.3
52.6
2.65
41.25
Section
-20
C. Results
Fig. 8 shows the simulation comparison between multilayer
and single layer filters. The central frequency of the multilayer
configuration was 983 MHz with fractional bandwidth of
22.07% and insertion losses of 2.3 dB.
f0
-40
-60
-80
-100
Multilayer S11
f1
0.4
0.6
Multilayer S21
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Frequency [GHz]
1.6
1.8
Figure 8. Electrical responses of the single layer and the multilayer filters.
TABLE III.
V.
Section
Impedance
()
Width
(mm)
Length
(mm)
40.4
2.4
58.2
97.4
0.55
33.1
40.4
1.2
51
97.4
0.3
27.4
40.7
0.8
35.7
38.4
1.5
41.6
57.5
0.45
42.6
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Vaisman, A.; Bohrquez, J.C.; Nova, O.; Massy, I.; Pena, N.M.; ,
"Algorithm for synthesis of 3dB-bandwidth Tchebyscheff bandpass
DBR filters," Communications, 2009. LATINCOM '09. IEEE LatinAmerican Conference on , vol., no., pp.1-3, 10-11 Sept. 2009.
Manchec, A.; Clavet, Y.; Quendo, C.; Rius, E.; Favennec, J.F.; Person,
C.; , "Cross-Coupled Microstrip Dual Behavior Resonator (DBR)
Filter," Microwave Conference, 2006. 36th European , vol., no., pp.556559, 10-15 Sept. 2006.
Issa, H.; Duchamp, J.-M.; Ferrari, P.; , "Miniaturized DBR filter:
Formulation and performances improvement," Microwave Symposium
Digest, 2008 IEEE MTT-S International , vol., no., pp.671-674, 15-20
June 2008.
Chang-Zhou Hua; Chen Miao; Wen Wu; , "A novel dual-band bandpass
filter based on DBR," Microwave Conference, 2009. APMC 2009. Asia
Pacific , vol., no., pp.1383-1386, 7-10 Dec. 2009.
Yann Clavet, Dfinition de solutions de filtrage planaires et
multicouches pour les nouvelles gnrations de satellites de
tlcommunications, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Bretagne Occidentale,
Brest, France, 2006.
David Pozar, Microwave Engineering. Second Edition. John Wiley &
Sons, 2008, pp. 6573.
G. L. Matthaei, L. Young, and E. M. T. Jones, Microwave Filters,
Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures. Dedham, MA:
Artech House, 1980, pp. 427433.