DESIGN OF WELL FOUNDATION

1.0

HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS
Design discharge through the bridge

2800

LWW

125.00

3.30

HFL

516.95

0.15

dsm

5.647

Maximum depth of scour at Pier

11.29

Maximum depth of scour at Abutments

7.17

P1

497.755

P2

492.416

P3

496.114

A1

505.063

A2

505.063

75

Number of Spans. PSC Girder

Span c/c of Piers

34.8

Skew of the Bridge (Right Crossing)

Nil

Effective linear water way

Maximum mean velocity of flow at HFL
High Flood Level
Afflux assumed
Scour Depths with Silt Factor of 1.25 for Medium Sand
Mean depth of scour

Founding Levels of Wells

Piers

Abutments

Safe Bearing Capacity for Foundations on Sand

2.0

TECHNICAL DATA

Heighest Flood Level

HFL

516.950

Bottom of Deck

BOD

518.784

Road Formation Level

RFL

520.849

Height of Deck + Gradient + W.C

2.065

Height of Pedastal for resting Bearings

0.150

Thickness of Elastomeric Bearings

0.078

Minimum Thickness of Cross Beam

Top of Bed Block

518.556

Bearing Level

518.706

509.916

Low Water Level

LWL

Top of Well cap (150 mm above LWL)

510.066

Outer Diameter of Pier

3.10

Inner Diameter of Pier

1.50

Thickness of Pier

0.80

Depth of Caping Beam

2000

Thickness of Well cap

2.25

Bottom of Well cap

507.816

Scour Levels with dsm

5.647

505.656

For Pier 2 dsm

For Abutment 1.27 dsm

509.77831

506.7854

Clause 222.4 of IRC:6-2000. For Seismic

90% For Pier 1.8 dsm
90% For Abutment 1.143 dsm

510.495479

Bottom of Foundations as per Scour calculations (Well Foundations)

Piers - P2

501.891

Provided considering existing soils

492.416

Abutments - A2

505.063

Linear waterway provided (Right crossing)

125.000

Max. mean Velocity of water flow at HFL

Tilt

=
=

3.30
1 in 80

Shift

Allowable Tilts & Shift of well

Diameter of Wells - Pier

0.15

=
- Abutment

7.00

= Caisson

Thickness of steining

0.900

Slant height of well curb

1.665

Maximum Foundation Pressure

56.880

Maximum Steining Stress

129.27

M.R

2079.66

1192.12

Span length c/c of piers

34.8

Total width of decking

12

Straight Returns Flywings

Design of Caping Beam

3.0

SUPER STRUCTURE AND LOADINGS & TYPE OF SUBSTRUCTURE

Width of roadway in between Crash Barriers

11

Width of Footpaths

Width of Crash Barriers

Type of Superstructure

= PSC Girder

Camber considered in slab in one direction

2.5

Thickness of Uniform Wearing coat in M30

0.078

Type of Substructure

= RCC Hollow Circular Piers

Type of Foundation for Piers

= RCC Circular Well &

NA
0.50

RCC Caisson
Type of Well caps

4.0

= RCC Circular

DESIGN LOADINGS
Unit Weight of Dead Loads as per IRC:6-2000
Unit Weight of PSC

2.50

Unit Weight of RCC

2.40

Unit Weight of PCC

2.30

Weight of Crash Barriers

0.80

Weight of Wearing Coat

0.18

Type of Live Loads

= One lane of Class - 70 R +

One lane of Class A

Seismic Effect:Zone

Seismic Coefficient

II
0.021

Parts of the structure embedded in soil shall not be considered to produce any
Seimic forces.

5.0

Wind force

= As per IRC:6-2000

Type of Bearings

= Elastomeric Bearings

Expansion Joints

= 30 mm Strip seal

Drainage Spouts

= As per IRC Standards

DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE
Span-1, c/c of Piers

34.80

Span-2, c/c of Piers

34.80

Thickness of Expansion Joints

30

Total length of Girder -1

34.05

Total length of Girder -2

34.05

c/c of bearings with end distance of 40 mm

Cumecs
m
m/sec
m
m

m
m
m

m
m
m
m
m
t/m2

Nos
m

m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m

m
m
m
m
mm
m
m
m
m
m

m
m

m
m
m
m
m/sec

m
m

m
m

t/m2
t/m2
t-m
t-m

m
m

%
m

CC Hollow Circular Piers

CC Circular Well &

t/m3
t/m3
t/m3
t/m
t/m2

ne lane of Class - 70 R +

ne lane of Class A

per IRC:6-2000

astomeric Bearings
mm Strip seal
per IRC Standards

m
m
mm

m
m

DESIGN OF PIER CAPING BEAM

1.0

DEAD WEIGHT
Weight of rectangular portion

1100

12.00

3.10

98.21

0.00

Area @ top

37.20

Area @ bottom

15.81

Average area

26.51

Beam
Weight of Tapered portion

Weight of Taper portion

mm
m
m
t
t

sqm
sqm
sqm