Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA
SCANDINAVICA
Significant outcomes
Younger female suicide attempters with severe personality disorders are prone to repeated suicide
attempts.
The severity of personality disorders was not related to the severity or the lethality of suicide
attempts.
Limitations
Introduction
Blasco-Fontecilla et al.
co-occurrence of PDs in more than one cluster
signicantly elevates suicide risk (1). Furthermore, greater personality disturbance in suicide
attempters is associated with repeated suicidal
behavior (2). There is high comorbidity among
Axis II disorders (39). Thus, a diagnosis of
specic PD might be of limited use in terms of
the estimation of suicide risk.
Tyrer and Johnson (10) developed a simplied
method of rating the severity of PDs, which has
proven to be clinically useful in separating patients
initial assessments and outcomes. This new system
represents an improvement on existing methods
and allows ratings to be made easily from DSM-IV
and ICD-10. With regard to the severity of PD,
Tyrer and Johnson (10) suggested a classication
of PDs that considered comorbidity (or, more
strictly speaking, overlap) of PD as a measure of
severity. This classication is based on four levels
of severity: no PD, personality diculty, simple
PD and diuse PD (Table 1).
The category of simple PD had a correspondence
with either a single PD or multiple PDs within the
same cluster in both DSM-IV and ICD-10 classications. The category of diffuse PD (10) had a
correspondence with two or more PDs from
dierent clusters. Patients with no PD had the
lowest initial symptom scores and the best outcomes, and those subjects diagnosed with a diuse
PD have more severe personality psychopathology,
the highest initial levels of symptoms (by using the
Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale)
and the poorest outcome over a 2 years follow-up
(10).
Aims of the study
Table 1. Classification of the severity of personality disorder by Tyrer and Johnson (10, 24)
Level
Classification
No personality disorder
Personality difficulty*
150
Description
Good capacity to form relationships, reasonable personal resources to draw
on in times of adversity
Tendency for enduring patterns of behaviour to interfere with social functioning
in times of particular stress and vulnerability but not at other times
Particular and persistent personality abnormalities that create major problems
in occupational, social and or personal relationships (present cutoff point
for personality disorder in ICD-10 and DSM-IV)
Widespread personality abnormalities covering more than one cluster of personality disorder
The diagnosis of PD was made by using the DSMIV version of the International Personality Disorder Questionnaire Screening Questionnaire
(IPDE-SQ). The DSM-IV version, in contrast to
the ICD-10, includes the diagnoses of narcissistic
and schizotypal PDs. The IPDE-SQ is a brief and
ecient screening questionnaire (13). In order to
increase specicity, we included one or two additional criteria besides those suggested by the IPDE
authors to adjust the rates of PDs in our sample of
controls to the rates of PDs in the general
population (14). We included one more criterion
to diagnose paranoid, schizoid, histrionic, dependent and avoidant PDs (for example, ve out of
seven criteria to diagnose paranoid PD instead of
the four criteria scheduled by IPDE authors), and
two more criteria for the remaining PDs. This
strategy has previously been used by others (15, 16)
with similar results (17).
The patients diagnosed with a PD were then
classied by PD severity into three groups, according to Tyrer & Johnsons classication (10): no PD,
simple PD or diuse PD (the category personality
difculty was not used, as Tyrer and Johnson
considered their ndings to provide little support
for the subclassication of personality diculty).
We compared no PD suicide attempters, simple PD
suicide attempters and diuse PD suicide attempters in terms of suicide intent, risk and rescue
factors, lethality of the suicide attempt and the
number of past suicide attempts. According to the
classication by Tyrer & Johnson (10), 26%
(115 446) of suicide attempters in our sample had
no PD, 36% (161 446) had a simple PD and 38%
(170 446) had a diuse PD.
Severity and lethality of suicide attempts were
measured by the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS), the
Risk-Rescue Rating Scale (RRRS) and the Lethality Rating Scale (LRS). Regarding the SIS (18), in
a previous work (11), we performed an exploratory
factor analysis of SIS. We found two factors:
expected lethality (S1) and planning (S2). The S1
factor was essentially loaded by items 4 (act to get
help), 9 (purpose of attempt), 10 (expectations of
fatality), 11 (concept of lethality), 12 (seriousness),
13 (ambivalence about living) and 14 (concept of
rescuability). The planning subscale (S2) includes
the items comprising the traditional denition of
attempt impulsivity of the SIS items 6 and 15
plus another six items: 1 (isolation), 2 (timing), 3
(precautions), 5 (nal acts), 7 (note) and 8 (communication). Both factors showed a high internal
consistency. The RRRS (19) allows clinicians to
assess suicide risk and rescue expectancies. High
Blasco-Fontecilla et al.
diuse PD had more past suicide attempts than
patients with simple or no PD, and attempters with
simple PD had more past suicide attempts than
those without PD (Table 2).
There were no signicant relationships between
the severity of PD according to Tyrer and Johnson
(10) and lethality of the suicide attempt, risk and
rescue scores, and suicide intent (Table 3).
The prevalence of diuse PD among suicide
attempters was lower in the older age groups (41%,
95 229 in those aged 1835; 39%, 50 127 in the
3650 age group; 25%, 12 48 among those aged
5165; and nally, 24%, 5 21 among those older
than 65).
After stratication by age groups, the association between PD severity and number of past
suicide attempts remained signicant only in the
youngest age group (1835 years). The results for
those older than 65 years should be interpreted
with caution, as there were no cases in certain
categories (Table 4).
After gender stratication, we found that the
relationship between the severity of PD and the
number of past suicide attempts remained significant only in women (Table 5).
We observed that the rates of Axis I diagnoses
were signicantly dierent among subjects without
PD (85%, 95 112), with simple PD (87%,
Table 4. Number of past suicide attempts in suicide attempters without personality disorder (PD), with simple and diffuse PD across age groups
No PD
Simple PD*
Diffuse PD
Age
82
38
37
157
(52)
(24)
(24)
(100)
66
60
42
168
(39)
(36)
(25)
(100)
3650
5165
Median
SD
152
1835
>65
P (ANOVA)
Number of past
suicide attempts
None
1 or 2
3
Total
None
1 or 2
3
Total
None
1 or 2
3
Total
None
1 or 2
3
Total
No PD
34
7
3
44
20
7
9
36
10
6
1
17
12
1
0
13
(77)
(16)
(7)
(100)
(56)
(19)
(25)
(100)
(59)
(35)
(6)
(100)
(92)
(8)
(0)
(100)
Simple PD*
45
26
19
90
24
8
9
41
11
4
4
19
1
0
2
3
(50)
(29)
(21)
(100)
(59)
(19)
(22)
(100)
(58)
(21)
(21)
(100)
(33)
(0)
(67)
(100)
Diffuse PD
37
33
25
95
19
18
13
50
4
4
4
12
3
2
0
5
(39)
(35)
(26)
(100
(38)
(36)
(26)
(100)
(34)
(33)
(33)
(100)
(60)
(40)
(0)
(100)
Total
116
66
47
229
63
33
31
127
25
14
9
48
16
3
2
21
(51)
(29)
(20)
(100)
(50)
(26
(24)
(100)
(52)
(29)
(19)
(100)
(76)
(14)
(10)
(100)
0.506
0.299
Table 5. Number of past suicide attempts in attempters without PD, and with
simple and diffuse PD in females and males
0.949
Sex
Number of past
suicide attempts
No PD
Simple PD*
Diffuse PD
Total
0.514
Female
0.571
Male
0.504
None
1 or 2
3
Total
None
1 or 2
3
Total
56
14
8
78
21
8
5
34
(72)
(18)
(10)
(100)
(62)
(23)
(15)
(100)
57
32
24
113
25
6
13
44
(50)
(28)
(2)
(100)
(57)
(14)
(29)
(100)
34
40
27
101
32
20
15
67
(34)
(40)
(26)
(100)
(48)
(30)
(22)
(100)
147
86
59
292
78
34
33
145
(50)
(30)
(20)
(100)
(54)
(23)
(23)
(100)
Blasco-Fontecilla et al.
The main limitation of our study is the use of a
screening questionnaire to diagnose PDs. The
IPDE-SQ is not recommended for making PD
diagnoses because of the lack of specicity and the
high rate of false positives typical of screening
questionnaires (14). In order to increase specicity,
we used an adjusted cut-o point. This strategy has
previously been used by others (15, 16). Perez et al.
(16) used a cut-o point of six criteria to diagnose
each PD. Ekselius et al. (15) added one more
criterion to the diagnosis of each PD when using
the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R
personality disorders-screening questionnaire.
They found good concordance between the results
of the adjusted cut-o screening questionnaire, the
full interview and the diagnosis made by clinicians.
Moreover, the percentages of PDs we found in our
sample of suicide attempters are slightly lower than
those reported by Dirks (17) using the Standardized
Assessment of Personality in a sample of 120
consecutive in-patients evaluated in the emergency
room after parasuicide, suggesting that we may
have used more stringent criteria for diagnosing
PDs.
Another limitation is that we did not control for
the levels of impulsivity, which might be a confounding factor in the association between PD
severity and suicidal behaviors.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Acknowledgements
This article was supported by the National Alliance for Research
on Schizophrenia and Aective Disorders (NARSAD), the
Spanish Ministry of Health (Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria,
FIS, PI060092 and RD06 0011 0016; Instituto de Salud Carlos
III, CIBERSAM), the Conchita Rabago Foundation, and the
Harriet and Esteban Vicente Foundation. Dr Baca-Garcia is the
Lilly Suicide Scholar at Columbia University.
17.
18.
19.
20.
References
1. Schneider B, Wetterling T, Sargk D et al. Axis I disorders
and personality disorders as risk factors for suicide. Eur
Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256:1727.
2. Laget J, Plancherel B, Stephan P et al. Personality and
repeated suicide attempts in dependent adolescents and
young adults. Crisis 2006;27:164171.
3. Blais MA, Norman DK. A psychometric evaluation of the
DSM-IV personality disorder criteria. J Personal Disord
1997;11:168176.
4. Hyler SE, Skodol AE, Oldham JM, Kellman HD, Doidge N.
Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: a replication in an outpatient sample.
Compr Psychiatry 1992;33:7377.
5. Lewin TJ, Slade T, Andrews G, Carr VJ, Hornabrook CW.
Assessing personality disorders in a national mental health
survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:87
98.
6. McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Skodol AE et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: baseline
154
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34. Horesh N, Orbach I, Gothelf D, Efrati M, Apter A. Comparison of the suicidal behavior of adolescent inpatients
with borderline personality disorder and major depression.
J Nerv Ment Dis 2003;191:582588.
35. Brieger P, Ehrt U, Bloeink R, Marneros A. Consequences
of comorbid personality disorders in major depression.
J Nerv Ment Dis 2002;190:304309.
36. Shah A. The relationship between suicide rates and age: an
analysis of multinational data from the World Health
Organization. Int Psychogeriatr 2007;19:11411152.
37. Corruble E, Hatem N, Damy C et al. Defense styles,
impulsivity and suicide attempts in major depression.
Psychopathology 2003;36:279284.
38. Grunebaum MF, Galfalvy HC, Oquendo MA, Burke AK,
Mann JJ. Melancholia and the probability and lethality of
suicide attempts. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:534535.
39. Zalsman G, Braun M, Arendt M et al. A comparison of the
medical lethality of suicide attempts in bipolar and major
depressive disorders. Bipolar Disord 2006;8(5 Pt 2):558
565.
40. Mann JJ, Waternaux C, Haas GL, Malone KM. Toward a
clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients.
Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:181189.
155