An essay I wrote for english, taking all I had learned about magical realism and applying it to Gabriel Garcia Marquez's novel, One Hundred Years of Solitude.
Original Title
The Determining of Reality in Application to One Hundred Years Of Solitude
An essay I wrote for english, taking all I had learned about magical realism and applying it to Gabriel Garcia Marquez's novel, One Hundred Years of Solitude.
An essay I wrote for english, taking all I had learned about magical realism and applying it to Gabriel Garcia Marquez's novel, One Hundred Years of Solitude.
actually exist. In One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garca Mrquez, there are many things that seem surreal or outlandish to us, but accepted as reality in the context of this novel. He takes the extraordinary and makes is common place, similarly making the extraordinary seem fantastical. For example, in the beginning of the book, gypsies come by the village and bring magnets and ice, and they are regarded as great, magical things to Aureliano Buenda. In our own reality, ice and magnets are normal, everyday things that most give no second thought to. Perhaps it is the fact that this is before magnets or ice are invented, or if it is simply because the characters call them magic that they are. rsula is going blind and aging rapidly; she comments on the passing of time and how it goes so quickly. The alteration of the perception of time is a common aspect of magic realism that we have learned. So was rsula speaking of
Mrquezs writing time so quickly, or is it just reality for
her? Its harder to tell what is reality when it is just an observation. But I believe that because it is an observation she made, it is her reality. The voice narrating this book is undetermined, so there is no reason to assume the fact that it could be biased toward one certain character or side. Therefore, we have no choice but to accept what happens in the story as truth. Perhaps reality is something that may not be defined, or, is completely dependent on what we accept. Children born of incestuous relationships, in our reality, are in danger of having many health risks and birth defects, where a child born in the book is born with a pigs tail. Our science proves this to be impossible, but in their world, this is as normal as they come. Why? Simply because. The fact that certain things that occur are fantastical and surreal by our standards in no way means that they are any less real. Reality is completely dependent on the interpreter, because everyone experiences the world differently. For the banana workers, they define reality by poor working conditions. But for the government, their reality is that these workers were wrong and needed to get back to work. My reality at that moment is that this is all happening in the pages of a .pdf file on my sisters laptop. Mrquezs
reality is that he is the creator of this world so similar
to his hometown. The fact that they are all seperate in no way means that they are any less real. Perhaps, the realities of the characters are fictional, yes, but Mrquez still wrote it that way, so we must accept it. In Chronicle of a Death Foretold, the story is told through a specific narrators eyes. His experiences make his reality, however his biases warp his seemingly objective telling of Santiago Nasars death. In standing in that newspaper reporter role, he must retell reality as it stands from a collective standpoint, from all possible angles. This differs greatly from One Hundred Years of Solitude where we skip bias altogether and have an objective viewpoint from the start. The narrator in CDF is certainly telling what is real, but its from his own perspective, therefore putting what is the objective reality further into the unknown. What really happened_ Can we trust the narrator? Its uncertain. In OHYAS, its clearer to interpret the realities of the Buendas and other townspeople, even if they are vastly different from