Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 8, Issue 2 Ver. II (Feb. 2015), PP 18-31
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: Vegetation Indices (VIs) are combinations of surface reflectance at two or more wavelengths
designed to highlight a particular property of vegetation. They are derived using the reflectance properties of
vegetation. The NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) and MSAVI2 (Modified Soil Adjusted
Vegetation Index) differencing methods using Landsat satellite ETM+7 and MSS images were implemented to
assess the relationship between some soil physical-chemical properties and these two vegetation indices in
Baqubah (the capital of Iraq's Diyala Governorate). The relationship between chemical _textural soil properties
and NDVI, MSAVI2 could not be established due mainly to the effect of climatic conditions and some geological
and pedological processes. A significant Pearson correlation was found between MSAVI2and CaCO 3 content at
the 0.05 level (2-tailed) of Landsat ETM+7. It is also observed that there were negative correlation coefficients
between CaCO3 content and the spectral reflectance values of Landsat MSS bands at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
This means that, the soils of the Lower Mesopotamian Plain are extremely calcareous. There were statistically
significant correlation coefficients between sand, clay, and organic matter (O.M.) contents and panchromatic
band of Landsat ETM+7 data. These results are related to the higher spatial resolution of ETM+7
Panchromatic band in comparison to the lower spatial resolution of reflective bands.
Keywords:Remote sensing; MSAVI2; NDVI; Spectral reflectance; Vegetation indices; Landsat-7 ETM+; MSS
data.
I.
Introduction
Remote sensing is the acquisition of information about an object or phenomenon without making
physical contact with the object and thus in contrast to in situ observation. In modern usage, the term generally
refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in
the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation). It may be split into
active remote sensing, when a signal is first emitted from aircraft or satellites) or passive (e.g. sunlight) when
information is merely recorded (Liu andMason, 2009).
Remote sensing is expected to offer possibilities for improving incomplete spatial and thematic
coverage of current regional and global soil databases. Traditionally, remotely sensed imagery have been used to
support segmentation of the landscape into rather homogeneous soillandscape units for which soil composition
can be established by sampling. Soil properties have also been inferred from optical and microwave data using
physically-based and empirical methods. Used as a secondary data source, remotely sensed imagery may
support spatial interpolation of sparsely sampled soil property data (Mulder et al., 2011).
The remotely acquired data and their relationships with soil mineralogy, texture organization, and
pedogenetic process have been well demonstrated by numerous studies. Nevertheless, the majority of these
studies are based on the use of ground spectral data obtained either under lab conditions or directly in the field
(Nanni and Dematt, 2006). Recently, others have tried to apply laboratory spectral analysis methodologies for
use in soil surveying (Dematt et al., 2004).
Remote sensing techniques offer fast access to information about soil conditions and have been applied
over a number of regions worldwide for mapping physical and chemical properties of bare ground. However, in
case of surfaces covered with vegetation it is also possible to estimate of soil conditions using remote sensing
data since vegetation patterns often reflect underlying soil properties. The pixel value on the satellite imagery is
proportional to the amount ofreflected radiation from a vegetated surface. Abundant, non-stressed plants reflect
more near-infrared energy and less visible light than a sparser vegetation cover. Since there are strong
relationships between soil conditions, plant biomass and their spectral response thus green vegetation can serve
as an indirect measure of underlying soils (Piekarczyk et al., 2012).
Alavi Panah and Goossens (2001)have shown thatthe behavior of the MSS and TM wavebands on
surface soil salinity conditions are almost the same.Based on the correlation obtained between the soil salinity
and TM and MSS DN values,they may generally conclude that thermal band of Landsat TM imagery provided
some useful information that may have an important role in soil salinity studies.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
18 | Page
II.
Baqubah is the capital of Iraq's Diyala Governorate.It is geographically situated on latitude33 25 2633 49 02 North and longitude 44 24 43- 44 33 40 East.The city is located some 50 km (31 mi) to the
northeast of Baghdad, on the Diyala River (Fig.1a).
A large portion of the province is drained by the Diyala River, a major tributary of the Tigris river.The
climate in Baqubah is called a desert climate. Throughout the year, there is virtually no rainfall in Baqubah.The
Kppen-Geiger climate classification is BWh (Peel et al., 2007).The average annual temperature in Baqubah is
22.8C. The average annual rainfall is 186 mm (Anderson, 2000).
The soils at this site are composed of very similar material to that in the lower Diyala area. Their parent
material is transported from the soft calcareous fringing upland, composed of Bakhtiari silts, clays, and gravels
overlying Fars marls and sandstones, and is interstratified in lower places with material brought by rivers and
canals.It appears possible that in the past some local sedimentation may have taken place behind Jabal Hamrin
from impounded Diyala flood water, but more recently a lowering of the base level in its gorge rejuvenated all
the upstream area.This has caused the largestwadis to be incised to a depth of as much as 30 feet and has left
raised terraces beside the river, which are particularly important in Upper Diyala where they are used for the
cultivation of rain-fed crops.Typically, the valley alluvium of the study area is a stoneless silty clay loam
containing about 30 percent, calcium carbonate and a small amount of gypsum (Hussein, 2013).
The study area includes one main soil formations;the alluvial flood plain. The land is naturally
vegetated withAgool (Alhagi maurorum).The major soil families at this site is (fine, Smectitic, active,
calcareous, hyperthermic, Typic Torrifluvents) (Soil Survey Staf, 2010).
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
19 | Page
III.
Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+7)imageries among other Satellites provide a number
of bands inthe visible, SWIR and thermal infrared regions, centered onparticular spectral features due to
different kinds of surfacematerial (Drury, 1993).
Theyareavailable and free of charge via theUSGS Global visualization Viewer
(http://glovis.usgs.gov).The selection of the imageries was based on the acquisitiondate, availability and spatial
resolution. A total of four MSS and seven ETM+7 bands,collected on 03/10/2013 (170 km x 185 km) and
03/06/2014 (170 km x 183 km)respectivelyhave been utilized in thisstudy (Fig. 1b, 1c). MSSincludefour
spectral bands with 60 m spatial resolution whilethe selected bands of ETM+7 include band 1through band 5
and band 7 (Visible & Reflected Infrared VNIR) that characterized with 30m spatial resolution. Inaddition to
band 8 as the Panchromatic band (15m). Thethermal Infrared band 6 has been excluded for its low
spatialresolution (60 m).
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
20 | Page
(a)
(b)
Figure 2.(a) Spatial _ Enhancement image of Landsat ETM+7data, (b) Spatial _ Enhancement image of
Landsat MSS data.
Table 1. Calculated Basic Statistics of Landsat ETM+7, MSS Data.
MSS
(p181, r37)
ETM+7
(p169, r37)
Scene
(Path, Row)
68.47
66.53
81.01
76.84
82.56
66.62
27.86
41.15
43.34
Standard
Deviation
17.44
25.14
41.89
32.49
44.73
38.39
21.15
32.64
33.16
Coeficien
ofvariation
25.47
37.78
51.71
42.28
54.17
57.62
75.91
79.32
76.51
33.38
25.45
76.24
Band
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
1
2
3
4
5
7
1
2
3
34
26
13
7
1
1
0
0
0
171
158
186
152
172
143
98
130
128
102
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
22 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
23 | Page
Defining an appropriate soil adjustment factor for pixels across an entire image, where the quantity and
type of vegetation and soil is not constant, is likely to cause non-systematic errors in estimates of variation in
vegetation indices among pixels within or between images. MSAVI2avoids thisproblem by replacing the
constant, empirical, adjustment factor for soil with adynamic,inductive one that varies inversely with the amount
of vegetation present in each pixel (Qi et al.,1994).
Qi et al. (1994)developed an improved SAVI (MSAVI2) with a self-adjustment factor L that does not
appear in the formulation of MSAVI2whichwas calculated from red band and near-infrared band reflectance
using thefollowingequation:
The following Bands from the satellite sensors MSS, ETM+7 were used to calculate NDVI, MSAVI2:
Landsat MSS -- bands 2 (600-700 nm) and 3 (700-800 nm).
Landsat ETM+7 -- bands 3 (630-690 nm) and 4 (750-900 nm).
The algebraic combinations of red and NIR reflectance were designed in particular to minimize the
effect of external influences such as solar irradiance changes due to atmospheric effect and due to variations in
soil background optical properties in the vegetation canopy spectral response (Chabrillat, 2006).
IV.
4.1.Analysis of vegetation density (NDVI, MSAVI2) using Landsat ETM+7, MSS data
We calculated the values of the two vegetation indices (NDVI, MSAVI2)of Landsat ETM+7, MSS
datausing combinations (pairs) of reflectance values in the red and NIR bands (Fig.4, 5).
Fig. 4 (a) shows the spatial distribution of NDVI from the LandsatETM+7 image. The NDVI values
estimated are in the range of 0.060 to 0.828, having a mean value of 0.366 with standard deviation of 0.255. It is
seems that lower NDVI value(dark area) is getting mixed with high dense built-up area on the south-west part of
image. Medium NDVI values (grey areas to bright areas) are observed over agricultural cropland, in the
northern part of the image. It is observed that the dense vegetation (orchids), and sparse vegetation (grass/park)
appear in bright tone, while waste land/bare soil appears in bright to gray tone. Residential (low and high dense
built-up areas) and water bodies (Diyala river) appear in dark tone.
A distribution of vegetation is found in theMSS image Fig. 4 (b), which is represented in range from
0.001 to 0.298, having a mean value of 0.058 with standard deviation of 0.057. It is observed that most of the
agricultural croplands appear in dark tone. It is also observed that some of the sparse vegetation is getting mixed
with low dense built-up and fallow land is getting mixed with waste land/bare soil. This is mainly due to the
lower spatial resolution of Landsat MSS reflective bands (60 m).
Fig. 5 (a) shows the spatial distribution of MSAVI2 from the Landsat ETM+7 image. The MSAVI2
values are represented in the range from -1.00 to -0.062, having a mean value of -0.463 with standard deviation
of 0.261. It is found that higher MSAVI2 value (bright area) corresponds to high dense vegetation (orchids) on
the south-west part of image. It is also observed that agricultural croplands appear in bright tone in the northern
part of the image.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
24 | Page
Figure 4. (a) NDVI (band 3_band 4) of Landsat ETM+7 data, (b)NDVI (band 2_band 3)of
Landsat MSS data.
Figure 5. (a) MSAVI2 (band 3_band 4)of Landsat ETM+7 data, (b)MSAVI2(band 2_band 3)of Landsat
MSS data
4.2. Relationship between vegetationindices and soil spectral properties
To determine the model for the prediction ofNDVI, MSAVI2, different regression types were
investigated. Fig. 6, 7, 8, 9 show the specification of linear, logarithmic,second-third-orderpolynomial, power
and exponential regression types forvegetation indices. The figures shows that the second- third
orderpolynomial equation has the highest correlation withchemical and textural soil properties.
Table 3 shows that regression coefficient (R2) of Landsat ETM+7between clay and CaCO3 contents
with NDVI was found 0.168, 0.160 respectively. It was observed that regression coefficient (R2)of Landsat MSS
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
25 | Page
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
26 | Page
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure7. Regression types of Landsat ETM+7 for predicting NDVI and MSAVI2 with Chemical Soil
properties:
(a) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and ECe.
(b) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and CaCO3content.
(c) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and organic matter (O.M.)content.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 8. Regression types of Landsat MSS for predicting NDVI and MSAVI2 with Textural Soil
properties:
(a) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and Sandcontent.
(b) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and Silt content.
(c) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and Clay content.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
27 | Page
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure9. Regression types of Landsat MSS for predicting NDVI and MSAVI2 with Chemical Soil
properties:
(a) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and ECe.
(a) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and CaCO3content.
(b) Relationship between NDVI, MSAVI2 and organic matter (O.M.) content.
Table 3.Regression types of Landsat ETM+7 for predicting NDVI and MSAVI2with Chemical and
Textural Soil properties.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
28 | Page
Table 5.Correlation coefficients between soil properties and NDVI, MSAVI2 vegetation
indices of Landsat ETM+7, MSS data at the study area.
www.iosrjournals.org
29 | Page
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level;**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 7.Correlation coefficients between soil propertiesand spectral reflectance values of the
MSS bands at the study area.
3. There were negative correlation coefficients between CaCO3 content and the spectral reflectance values of
Landsat MSS bands 1, 2, 3 at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) as shown in Table 7. The parent material of alluvial
soils at this siteis formed by sedimentsof Tigrisriver and is generally calcareous.The lime distribution is
usually homogenous withinthe soil profile,but in recent sedimentsthe top meter has a higher lime
contentwhichincreases with depthand with the age of these sediments (Dost, 2003).
4. There was no significant correlation between electrical conductivity (ECe) and the spectral reflectance
values of Landsat ETM+7, MSS bands, due to the non-saline soils, and deep groundwater table at the study
area. Irrigation water is brought in from the Diyala Weir. After the land has been irrigated, the water drains
away to the lower lying Diyala river which therefore has a higher salt content. The importance and the
effect of good soil drainage is clearly shown in this area (Buringh, 1960).
V.
1.
2.
3.
Conclusions
Based on the results obtained from Landsat ETM+7, MSS images, we may generally conclude:
The spatial distribution of MSAVI2 from the Landsat ETM+7 image shows thathigher MSAVI2 value
(bright area) corresponds to high dense vegetation (orchids) on the south-west part of image. It is also
observed that agricultural croplands appear in bright tone in the northern part of the image. The MSAVI2
can be said to be a more sensitive indicator of vegetation amount overthat of NDVI.
The relationship between chemical _textural soil properties and NDVI, MSAVI2 usingdifferent regression
types could not be established due mainly to the effect of climatic conditions and some geological and
pedological processes.
There was no significantPearsoncorrelation between MSAVI2 and soil physical and chemical properties of
Landsat ETM+7, MSS but a significant correlation was found between MSAVI2and CaCO 3 content at the
0.05 level (2-tailed) of Landsat ETM+7. This means that, the soils of the LowerMesopotamian Plain are
extremely calcareous.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
30 | Page
5.
6.
There werestatistically significant correlation coefficients between sand, clay, andorganic matter (O.M.)
contents andpanchromatic band of Landsat ETM+7data. These results are related to the higher spatial
resolution of ETM+7 Panchromatic band in comparison to the lower spatial resolution of reflective bands.
There were negative correlation coefficients between CaCO3 content and the spectral reflectance values of
Landsat MSS bands 1, 2,3due tothe parent material of alluvial soils at the study area which is formed by
sedimentsof Tigrisriver and is generally calcareous.
There was no significant correlation between electrical conductivity (EC e) and the spectral reflectance
values of Landsat ETM+7, MSS bands, due to the non-saline soils, and deep groundwater table at the study
area.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
[23].
[24].
[25].
[26].
[27].
[28].
Alavi Panah, S. K.; and R. Goossens. 2001.Relationship Between the Landsat TM, MSS DATA and Soil Salinity. J. Agric. Sci.
Technol. 3: 21-31.
Anderson, E. 2000. The Middle East Geography and Geopolitics.New York: Routledge.
Bowman G. M.; and J. Hutka. 2002. Particle size analysis. In Soil Physical Measurement and Interpretation For Land Evaluation.
(Eds. NJ McKenzie, HP Cresswell, KJ Coughlan) pp. 224-239. (CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Victoria).
Buringh, P.1960. Soils and soil conditions in Iraq. Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, Iraq.
Chabrillat, S. 2006. Land degradationindicators: spectral indices. Annals of Arid Zone. 45(3&4): 331-354.
Dematt J.A.M.; R.C. Campos.; M.C. Alves; P.R. Fiorio; and M.R. Nanni. 2004. Visible-NIR reflectance: a new approach on soil
evaluation. Geoderma. 121: 95-112.
Dogana, H. M.; and O. M. Kla. 2013. Modelling and mapping some soil surface properties of Central Kelkit Basin in Turkey by
using Landsat-7 ETM+ images. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 34(15): 5623-5640.
Dost, M.2003. End of Assignment Report, FAO Iraq.
Drury, S. A. 1993. Image interpretation in geology. 2 nded. London: Chapman and Hall.
El-Kuwaz, S. S.2007. Rangelands Management and Development in Iraq. Proceedings of the expert consultation on range
monitoring including under forest systems in the Near East. pp.177-188. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations,
Rome.
Gupta R. Remote Sensing Geology. 2003. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Holben, B.N.; andC.O. Justice. 1981. An examinationof spectral band rationing to reduce the topographic effect on remotely sensed
data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2: 115-121.
Hussein, H. A. 2013."Dependable Discharges of The Upper and Middle Diyala Basins". Journal of Engineering 16(2): 4960-4969.
Lagacherie P.; F. Baret; J. B. Feret; J. M. Netto ; and J. M. Robbez-Masson 2008. Estimation of soil clay and calcium carbonate
using laboratory, field and airborne hyperspectral measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment. 112: 85-95.
Liu, J. G.; and P. J. Mason. 2009. Essential Image Processing for GIS and Remote Sensing. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 4.
Markham, B. L.;and J. L. Barker. 1986. Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamicranges, exoatmospheric reflectance and atsatellite temperatures. EOSAT Landsat TechnicalNotes. 1: 3-8.
Mulder, V.L.; S. de Bruin; M.E. Schaepman; and T.R. Mayr. 2011. The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping A
review. Geoderma. 162: 1-19.
Nanni M.R.; and J.A.M. Dematt. 2006. Spectral reflectance methodology in comparison to traditional soil analysis. Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J. 70: 393-407.
NASA (Ed.) 2011. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook Landsat Project Science Office at NASA's Goddard Space Flight
Center in Greenbelt, 186,Cited at:http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/pdfs/Landsat7_Handbook.pdf
Peel, M. C.;B. L. Finlayson; and T. A. McMahon. 2007. "Updated world map of the KppenGeiger climate classification". Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci. 11: 1633-1644.
Piekarczyk, J.; C. Kazmierowski; and S. Krlewicz. 2012. Relationships between soil properties of the abandonedfields and spectral
data derived from aster image.Advances in Space Research. 49( 2): 280-291.
Qi, J.; A. Chehbouni; A.R. Huete; Y.H. Kerr; and S. Sorooshian. 1994. Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI).
RemoteSensingof Environment. 48:119-126.
Raij B.; J. A. Quaggio; H. Cantarella; M. E. Ferreira; A. S. Lopes; and C. O.Bataglia. 1987. Anlise Qumica do Solo Para Fins de
Fertilidade. Fundao Cargill: Campinas.
Rouse, J. W.; R. H. Haas; J. A. Schell; and D. W. Deering 1973. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS,
Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351 I, 309-317.
Saad, Z. J.; and J. C. Goff. 2006. Geology of Iraq. Published by Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno.
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11 th.ed; 2010. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Verheye, W. 2005. Soils of arid and semi-arid areas. Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Sciences Vol.VII.
Zhang, H.; J. L. Schroder; J. J. Pittman; J. J. Wang; and M. E. Payton. 2005. Soil salinity using saturated paste and 1:1 soil and
water extracts. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69: 1146-1151.
DOI: 10.9790/2380-08221831
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page