Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ETSICCP, Polytechnic University of Valencia. Camino de Vera, s/n. 46071 Valencia, Spain
EPS Engineering, Dep. Construction, University of Oviedo. Campus de Viesques, 33203 Gijn, Spain
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 October 2008
Received in revised form 31 January 2009
Accepted 8 February 2009
Available online 13 March 2009
Keywords:
Recycled concrete
Recycled aggregate concrete
Creep and shrinkage
a b s t r a c t
This paper presents the results of experimental research into concrete produced by replacing the natural
aggregates with recycled aggregates coming from construction waste and concrete work demolitions. The
main aim of this work was to determine creep and shrinkage variations experienced in recycled concrete,
made by replacing the main fraction of the natural aggregate with a recycled aggregate coming from
waste concrete and comparing it to a control concrete. The substitution percentages were 20%, 50%
and 100%. Fine natural aggregate was used in all cases and the amount of cement and watercement ratio
remained constant in the mixture. It was possible to state that the evolution of deformation by shrinkage
and creep was similar to a conventional concrete, although the results after a period of 180 days showed
the inuence of the substitution percentage in the recycled aggregates present in the mixture. In the case
when 100% coarse natural aggregate was replaced by recycled aggregate there was an increase in the
deformations by creep of 51% and by shrinkage of 70% as compared to those experienced by the control
concrete.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Under the National Plan of Construction and Demolition Waste
(PNRCD 20012006) carried out in Spain, different studies were
made with the purpose of being able to reuse construction waste
in concrete production.
Currently in Spain several groups of researchers are working
jointly in the development of specic rules that regulate the use
of these materials in concrete production [1,2]. Following these
objectives, with the support of the Spanish Ministry of Environment and coordinated by the Structures and Materials Head Ofce
Laboratory of the Cedex (Training and Experimentation Center for
Public Works), the experimental project of regulatory context
RECNHOR was developed. Our work team participated in this project together with the Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the University of A Corua and the University of Cantabria. Specically,
the team was in charge of evaluating the inuence of recycled
aggregate on the deferred properties of the concrete. It was important to determine these parameters in order to confront the design
of reinforced concrete elements prepared with recycled aggregates
in a safe way.
Snchez de Juan [3], Ammon [4] and Gmez-Sobern [5], who
have worked previously in this line of investigation, presented several conclusions. Shrinkage values between 15% and 60% were obtained by Snchez de Juan [3], higher in recycled aggregate
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 985 181947; fax: +34 985 182055.
E-mail address: serrano@uniovi.es (M.A. Serrano-Lpez).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.018
concretes as compared to those containing natural aggregate. Similar values to the ones obtained for concretes made with aggregates
coming from slag were presented in [4]. In [5] it is concluded that
due to a higher absorption of recycled aggregate, the shrinkage and
creep of the recycled concrete increased. The higher the percentage
of recycled aggregate added, the greater the increase.
2. Experimental program
2.1. Components
The primary concrete components in this work were:
Cement: CEM I 42.5 N/S. The chemical composition is shown in Table 1.
Aggregates: ne aggregate FNA (0/4 mm), coarse aggregate CA (10/20 mm),
coarse aggregate CA (4/10 mm), coarse recycled aggregate RCA (4/20 mm).
Additive: superplastifying Sikament 500.
The coarse recycled aggregate is similar in appearance to the natural crushed
aggregates although its texture is rougher due to adhered mortar waste [6,7], presenting a greater absorption than natural aggregates (Table 2). Another important
factor is the lower density of recycled aggregates due to the presence of mortar adhered to the aggregates [6,7].
Recycled aggregates generally fulll adequate granulometric analysis for concrete production [7]. This granulometric analysis was carried out according to the
European Code UNE-EN 933-1. Fig. 1 shows the granulometric analysis and the
granulometric modulus of the aggregates used.
The aggregates used in the study show a continuous granulometric curve, and
the percentage of declassied material present in the coarse recycled aggregates
is lower than 5%, making them suitable for use.
The most important property that differentiates natural aggregates from recycled ones is the percentage of adhered mortar, determined according to the test
2546
Table 1
Chemical composition of cement.
Loss on ignition
SiO3
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MgO
CaO
SO3
Na2O
K2O
Insoluble residue
2.55
20.30
6.05
2.20
0.16
62.39
2.81
0.27
0.73
0.74
Table 2
Densities, absorption and LA wear coefcient of aggregates.
Material
Dry density
(kg/m3)
Density SSD
(kg/m3)
Absorption
24 h (%)
LA
coefcient (%)
2647
2622
2338
2460
2673
2659
2460
2540
0.98
1.42
5.19
3.22
27.8
31.96
40.22
procedure established in [8]. This method involves applying stresses to the adhered
mortar in order to cause its detachment from the rocky matrix. The sample is
weighed and immersed in water. Next, the sample is heated up in a furnace and,
subsequently, a thermal crash is produced by dipping it again into cold water. Finally, the sample is sieved using a 2 mm sieve. The mortar that is still adhered is removed by hitting the sample with a rubber mallet. Once the cleaning has been
done, the sample is weighed again. The weight difference represents the adhered
mortar.
It can be observed (Table 3) how a greater percentage of adhered mortar is concentrated in the nest fractions.
The consistency of the concrete was measured by the Abrams cone method,
according to the code UNE-EN 12350-2: 2006, obtaining results (Table 5) that show
how a greater presence of recycled aggregate decreases the workability of the concrete. That is the reason why it is necessary to use saturated recycled aggregate [9]
or a greater amount of superplastifying additives.
Following the European Code UNE-EN 12390-2 to carry out the strength tests,
samples in cylindrical specimen of 15 30 cm unmolded the following day were
prepared so as to be cured for 7 days in a chamber at a constant temperature of
20 C and a humidity of over 95%. On the 8th day, the specimens of mixture A were
left in the humidity chamber until day 28, whereas the specimens of mixture B
were taken to a climatic chamber that presented a drying atmosphere of 65% RH
and a temperature of 23 C, where the creep and shrinkage tests were carried out.
Table 3
Adhered mortar in recycled aggregates.
Fraction (mm)
Aggregate (%)
4/8
8/20
68.5
81
31.5
18
2.2. Mixtures
Table 4
Mixture composition.
The dosage rate of the tested concretes can be observed in Table 4. A control
concrete with 40 MPa of compressive strength was used. The recycled concrete
was produced by substituting 20%, 50% and 100% of the natural coarse aggregate
with the recycled aggregate.
Two mixtures (A and B) were prepared for each percentage. Each one was cured
in a different way in order to study the behaviour of its mechanical properties. The
mixture was prepared according to the following procedure: rst, the coarse aggregates and 1/3 of the water were added, giving the mixer a few turns. Later the sand,
the cement and another third of the water was added, mixing it for 3 min and leaving the mixture to rest for another 3 min, covering it to avoid evaporation. Finally,
the remaining third of the water and the additive were added, mixing it for 2 more
minutes, after which the mixture was ready.
Material
Cement (kg)
Water (kg)
FNA (0/4 mm) (kg)
CNA (10/20 mm) (kg)
CNA (4/10 mm) (kg)
RCA (4/20 mm) (kg)
w/c Ratio
Additive (%)
20%
50%
100%
380
190
713.90
882.20
121.59
0
0.5
0.7
380
190
744.45
665.28
91.69
189.24
0.5
0.7
380
190
709.54
414.06
57.07
471.12
0.5
0.7
380
190
714.56
0
0
874.04
0.5
1.4
2547
Percentage
recycled
Slump
(cm)
Density 7 days
(kg/dm3)
Density 28 days
(kg/dm3)
fc 7 days
(MPa)
Coefcient of
variation (%)
fc 28 days
(MPa)
Coefcient of
variation (%)
Elastic modulus
(MPa)
Coefcient of
variation (%)
H40 A
0
20
50
100
17
14
5
19
2.36
2.35
2.34
2.31
2.36
2.35
2.34
2.32
39.5
41.5
40.4
47.3
1.60
1.54
2.14
1.88
45.25
47.40
47.3
54.80
1.83
2.04
2.20
2.34
33,308
32,360
33,516
30,337
0.71
1.42
1.73
1.59
H40 B
0
20
50
100
17
15
5
18
2.37
2.34
2.35
2.31
2.34
2.32
2.32
2.29
45.85
47.70
50.20
54.10
1.90
2.1
2.30
2.51
36,223
32,360
34,072
30,995
1.1
1.83
2.14
2.21
3. Experimental results
The mortar present in recycled aggregate causes a greater wear
rate in the Los Angeles machine (Table 2). Comparing the natural
coarse aggregate to the recycled one, a wear increase between
26% for the CNA (4/10 mm) and 44% for the CNA (10/20 mm)
was observed.
2548
3.2. Creep
The creep function that denes the total elastic deformation of the
concrete under a uniform compression load after 28 days is expressed by:
Jt; t 0 ; t 0
1 Ut; t 0 ; t0
E0
Table 6
Concrete properties, correcting the mix water by effect of aggregate absorption for
mixture A.
Percentage recycled
fc (MPa)
E (MPa)
0
20
50
100
21
21
21
21
42.78
42.70
41.30
41.80
32,153
31,178
31,204
31,589
3.1. Shrinkage
Shrinkage began to be measured after 7 days of curing, registering values (Fig. 3) that clearly showed the inuence of the percentage of recycled aggregates. There was greater deformation by
shrinkage as the percentage of recycled aggregate substitution
increased.
Shrinkage in the recycled concrete with a substitution percentage of 50% was around 20% higher than that of the control concrete,
whereas with a substitution percentage of 100% the shrinkage increase reached 70% after a period of 180 days.
It could also be observed that increases in the chambers relative humidity caused the shrinkage to diminish. In Fig. 3, it can
be seen that the shrinkage curves fell after around 77 days, coinciding with the maximum values of relative humidity in the chamber (Fig. 4).
2549
2550
2551
Fig. 10. Specic experimental creep vs prediction models for H40 control.
At 28 days a uniform compressive load was applied to the specimen, causing an instantaneous elastic deformation and later creep
deformations appeared as the concrete got older. The values of the
shrinkage and creep deformations for the control concrete can be
observed in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively, for comparison with the
results from their prediction models.
As can be seen in the previous gures, the values obtained experimentally for both types of deformations are overestimated by the
prediction models. This trend suggests that the control concrete
in fact presents less extended deformations than predicted and that
estimations based on these models would be conservative.
4.2. Concrete with recycled aggregates
A comparison of the experimental results was also carried out
for the recycled concrete in order to evaluate whether use of the
2552
Fig. 11. Extended deformations of H40-20% concrete compared with prediction models.
Fig. 12. Extended deformations of H4050% concrete compared with prediction models.
Fig. 13. Extended deformations of H40 100% concrete compared with prediction models.
2553