Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a n d J. D. M A T T H E W S
1. I N T R O D U C T I O N
The most prevalent cause of deterioration of reinforced
concrete is corrosion of the steel reinforcement. Consequently, the ability of the concrete cover to protect the
steel is of paramount importance in determining concrete
durability. In order to maintain the steel in a depassivated
state the concrete cover must resist the penetration of
carbon dioxide and chloride ions to the depth of the steel.
Although the chemistry of the concrete may influence the
rate of penetration of these agents, physical resistance is
provided by the general low permeability of concrete. In
addition, if depassivation of the steel occurs, the rate of
corrosion will depend on the permeability of the concrete
to oxygen and water. The permeability of the concrete
cover can therefore be seen as a key factor in determining
the overall durability of reinforced concrete.
It has been well established that the partial replacement
of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) by fly ash can lead
to a significant reduction in permeability of both
hardened cement paste I-1,2] and concrete I-3]. This
reduction may be attributed to a combination of the
reduction in water content for a given workability and
the pore structure refinement due to pozzolanic reaction.
Due to the long-term nature of the pozzolanic reaction,
the benefits associated with it are more evident in
well-cured concrete, and it has been generally considered
that fly ash concrete has a greater susceptibility to poor
curing than OPC concrete.
In this study the permeability of fly ash concrete, with
a range of fly ash contents, is compared with control
* Present address: Civil Research Department, Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5S4,
Canada..
0025-5432/92 9 RILEM
2.1 Materials
A single source of ordinary Portland cement complying
with BS 12 [4] was used throughout this study and its
chemical analysis and Bogue compositions are given in
Table 1. Three samples of fly ash were used and these
were selected to provide ashes with a range of 45 I~m
sieve retention values. The physical and chemical
properties of these ashes are given, in Table 1. Thames
Valley gravel aggregates were used for all concrete mixes.
389
OPC
Fly ash
P1
P2
P3
SiOz
AIzO 3
Fe203
CaO
MgO
K20
Na20
TiO 2
P:O 5
MnzO 3
BaO
SrO
SO 3
Cr/O3
LOI
20.55
5.07
3.10
64.51
1.53
0.73
0.15
0.26
0.19
<0.01
0.01
0.18
2.53
n.d.
1.58
48.2
26.7
11.6
1.71
1.62
3.18
0.65
0.88
0.33
0.02
0.15
0.05
0.83
0.03
4.34
48.1
24.0
10.6
6.12
1.61
1.83
0.79
1.00
0.63
0.11
0.14
0.07
0.90
0.03
4.49
Total
100.39
100.41
100.53
Free lime
52.4
26.0
9.4
1.69
1.54
2.87
1.32
0.94
0.21
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.85
0.03
2.80
100.34
0.96
Total C (included
in LOI)
3.83
4.10
1.98
45 gm sieve residue
11.34
19.45
5.53
Relative density
2.46
2.44
2.46
Bogue composition
C3S
C2S
C3A
C4AF
57
16
8
9
series
series
series
series
series
series
A, G a n d H: 20~
B:
20~
C:
20~
D:
20~
E:
5~
F:
5~
and
and
and
and
and
and
65% RH.
40}/0 RH.
8 0 ~ RH.
90~o RH.
6 5 ~ RH.
80% RH.
AtoF
Control
mix
cement
content
(kg m- 3)
Mix
No.
300 (35N)
1
2
3
4
5
6
15~ P1
30~ PI
50% P1
30% P2
30% P3
300
271
242
196
1
2
3
4
5
6
15~ P1
30% P1
50% P1
30~ P2
30~ P3
250
226
202
162
1
2
3
4
5
6
15~ P1
30% P1
50% P1
30~ P2
30% P3
350
314
280
226
250 (25 N)
350 (45 N)
Fly
ash
content
Fly
ash
Total
water
Estimated
'free'
Thames Valley aggregate w/(c + f)
<5 mm
48
104
196
40
87
162
55
120
226
10-5
mm
20-10
mm
Workability
tests
Slump
(mm)
CF
Wet
density
(k9 m- 3)
28-day
water-cured
compressive
strength
(MN m -z)
188
180
173
162
655
635
603
577
As mix A3
As mix A3
405
411
418
418
810
822
835
836
0.57
0.51
0.45
0.37
50
45
40
30
50
50
0.89
0.89
0.87
0.85
0.87
0.88
2365
2370
2375
2370
2370
2375
41.5
44.5
45.5
41.5
49.5
47.0
189
181
174
162
691
653
633
590
As mixG3
As mixG3
402
423
428
438
819
845
855
876
0.68
0.61
0.54
0.44
60
55
30
40
35
55
0.91
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.89
0.88
2335
2360
2375
2370
2360
2370
32.5
33.0
34.5
33.0
33.5
33.5
188
180
173
162
564
564
541
514
As mixH3
As mixH3
419
418
420
419
837
836
841
838
0.49
0.44
0.39
0.32
40
35
50
30
35
35
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.80
0.87
0.85
2365
2360
2375
2370
2360
2370
50.0
50.0
53.0
48.0
50.5
50.5
390
T h o m a s and M a t t h e w s
2QLtIP~
K o -
10-1s[/
>,
~ 10-17
5C
.c.
10-1a
Fly ash content (% Pl)
P )A
391
Control
cement
content
(kg m - 3)
Air-storage
conditions
Temp.
(~
A1
2
3
3
5
6
300
20
B1
2
3
4
300
20
C1
2
3
4
300
D1
2
3
4
Fly ash
content
(~o)
RH
(~)
Air-stored following
specified curing period
i day
3 days
7 days
4.74
2.10
1.10
0.64
1.08
1.98
47.5
34.2
31.9
32.2
26.5
27.4
30.9
29.0
17.9
16.7
13.6
17.0
24.2
18.6
16.5
8.94
12.1
11.8
40
0
15 P1
30 P1
50 P1
5.11
2.21
1.00
0.91
65.4
32.3
36.1
35.1
32.5
25.7
26.9
11.3
26.2
16.2
16.5
6.02
20
80
0
15 P1
30 P1
50 P1
5.68
2.57
1.92
0.80
43.0
24.3
22.4
22.6
29.8
14.4
14.3
6.33
16.9
13.7
10.9
6.49
300
20
90
0
15 P1
30 P1
50 P1
3.52
1.89
1.08
0.25
18.8
13.6
12.2
11.2
14.2
14.0
10.9
7.55
12.1
9.62
4.80
4.60
E1
2
3
4
5
6
300
65
0
15
30
50
30
30
P1
P1
P1
P2
P3
4.85
2.15
1.61
1.73
2.64
1.58
44.8
31.2
43.1
65.4
43.9
31.8
25.7
17.8
21.9
28.8
19.6
15.4
9.14
5.32
5.30
6.53
10.7
8.06
F1
2
3
4
300
80
0
15 P1
30 P1
50 P1
5.96
3.04
3.14
1.60
42.4
25.3
30.3
21.7
16.0
6.26
13.8
8.12
12.6
6.60
3.44
4.80
G1
2
3
4
5
6
250
20
65
0
15
30
50
30
30
P1
P1
P1
P2
P3
5.26
4.60
3.28
1.06
4.97
2.21
65.2
61.5
54.1
40.7
43.8
29.1
36.2
32.3
22.0
11.4
22.3
16.3
25.3
17.3
16.1
10.4
8.06
21.3
H1
2
3
4
5
6
350
0
15
30
50
30
30
PI
P1
P1
P2
P3
2.94
1.15
0.84
0.25
0.86
1.05
43.7
24.5
18.2
15.8
14.5
16.3
24.3
18.4
9.76
3.24
16.3
12.2
19.6
12.7
8.59
3.23
6.20
8.60
65
0
15
30
50
30
30
Water-cured
for
28 days
P1
P1
P1
P2
P3
20
65
392
10-1s
Air-storage conditions
Curing
period
5~ & 65%rh
20~
& 65%rh
1 day
- - -o- --
w,
3 days
- - .-~ - - .
7 days
---z~ . . . .
.t
.J
/
~ o I~
25
~
o
"5
10-1~
\
I
J
x
"izx. . . . . . . . .
15
~ .......
10-15
~fJ
30
50
Fly a s h c o n t e n t (% P 1 )
o
o
=
300
=
v
350
lt5
3t0
'o
393
10-~s
Concretes air-stored
at 20~ (mixes A to D)
f,
"O
O
10"~s
.-'"
a'"
Fly ash
content
4'0
Curingperiod:
7 days
"~,
1 day
15%P1
~"
.... ~---
30%P1
. . . . v. . . .
50%Pl
. . . . t3. . . .
6'o
s'0
"x
"'o
g'o
8'0
7'0
10-1s
0%
A
e~
..
:-E
"\
~..]o_-..r.
*
Oo
"<J ~
~.,oo
"~,...
o .O
~ I0-16
**..
~-~.~
15% P1
"-'-""-..z=-o.s27
"6
3 0 % P1
-o--
----
50% P1
oo "%\
o9
%=-o.9o8
\
\
\
10-I;
i
20
31o
i
40
30%P2
30%P3
50
394
T h o m a s and Matthews
10-1s,
15% P1
/]
"-o~ o
~ - ~
o
~~
a i 0-,,/~
r=--0.957
o. " - - - - . - ~
""-o_.~
\..:..
D -~,~ r = -- 0.923~
30% P1
:-'---_
0.a77
~..~
--~------50%P1
~
o
r = - - 0.900
30% P2
30% P3
10-I; 0 '
2'0
1;
3~0
4~0
Fig. 6 Relationship between the compressive strength at the end of curing and permeability of concrete.
IO-iS
g
10.ls
E
&
Q
at 2O~
and
65% rh
-~ 10-17.
Curing period:
1 day 7 days 28 days
9
o
~ 0 '/,,fly ash
9
v
(~) 15%P1
9
~
| 30% P1, P2 or P3
50% P1
1o-la
0.3
014
015
016
0.7
395
permeability (and thus durability). Fly ash concretes are
considerably less permeable than equal-strength OPC
concretes (by up to five times for concretes with a strength
of 50 MN m -2 at 28 days). In addition, it was shown
that poorly-cured high-grade concretes may be considerably more permeable than well-cured low-grade concretes of the same actual 28-day air-stored strength.
The relationship in Fig. 7 shows that the permeability
of concrete for given curing and exposure conditions is
closely related to its water to total cementitious material
ratio [-w/(c + f)] irrespective of the level of fly ash
replacement. This would suggest that, in terms of
permeability, fly ash is as effective as an equal mass of
OPC. In practice, the inclusion of fly ash in the mix
allows the water content to be reduced, resulting in a
lower w/(c + f) ratio and consequently reduced permeability.
Although these results refer to a single source of OPC,
it has recently been reported [11] that differences in the
composition of Portland cement have a significantly
smaller effect on the permeability of concrete than factors
such as curing or water/cement ratio.
The results of this study conclusively show that the
incorporation of fly ash results in a concrete of reduced
permeability and consequently increased durability.
Although these improvements are more noticeable in
well-cured high-strength concretes, fly ash concrete
remains less permeable even when inadequately cured.
These results are consistent with the reported findings
[,12-14] from an investigation of the properties of OPC
and fly ash concretes taken from a range of in-service
concrete structures. In each case examined, the cover
50mm of the fly ash concrete was found to be less
permeable than the comparable OPC concrete (comparisons based on equal grade or cementitious content)
taken from the same structure.
5. CONCLUSIONS
1. For concretes that were water-cured for 28 days,
those containing fly ash were of lower permeability than
equal-grade OPC concretes, the differences increasing
with fly ash content.
2. The permeability of all the concretes examined was
highest at the shortest curing time, especially when the
ambient relative humidity was low.
3. As the ambient relative humidity during storage
increased, permeability decreased and the effects of the
duration of moist curing became less significant.
4. For concretes cured and exposed at 20~ fly ash
concretes were of lower permeability than equal-grade
OPC concrete even under the poorest curing and storage
conditions (one-day cure, low ambient relative humidity).
5. For concretes cured and exposed at 5~ concrete
with 50% fly ash was more permeable than the
equal-grade OPC concrete unless adequate curing was
provided. Concretes with 15 or 30% fly ash remained less
permeable than the control concrete when cured for only
1 day and exposed to low ambient relative humidity.
396
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The work described has been carried out at the Building
Research Establishment in collaboration with a National
Power/Imperial College Research Fellowship. The authors would like to thank Mr Charles Haynes for carrying
out the laboratory work.
7.
8.
9.
REFERENCES
RESUME
Perm6abilit6 du b6ton aux cendres volantes
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.