Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT ASSESSMENT
STUDENT
Surname & Initials:
University number:
Project Title:
EK Herrmann
Mr.
Ms
21687080
Hot water geyser management system
EXAMINER
Surname & Initials:
Affiliation:
Prof JA de Kock
NWU
Evaluation criteria
Weight
Mark out
of 100
PROBLEM FORMULATION
issues to be addressed
design is clear
C
Weighted
Mark
80
8.0
0.10
8.0
80
0.10
80
32.0
0.40
80
0.20
90
16.0
18.0
0.20
/500
1,00
82
/100
Category:
Legend:
Totally Unacceptable
Poor
Acceptable
Good
Exceptional
0% 30 %
30% 50%
50% 65%
65% 75%
75% +
MJ Grobler 2012-11-08
Compliance:
Motivation:
Section C (DESIGN )
> 50%
Yes
No
Section D
(IMPLEMENTATION ,
EVALUATION AND
CONCLUSION)
> 50%
Yes
No
Solid design
Well executed
Excellent report
Section E (WRITTEN
COMMUNICATION)
> 50%
Yes
No
Compliance
Motivation:
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
10
Engineering professionalism
Yes
No
No
Very professional
No
COMMENTS
Examiner
Project Administrator
20 Nov 2013
20 Nov 2013
Date
Supervisor
Date
Date
MJ Grobler 2012-11-08
ANNEXURE
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ECSA EXIT LEVEL OUTCOME ADHERANCE:
The following minimum requirements must be demonstrated in order for the student to adhere
to ECSAs exit level outcomes:
EXIT LEVEL OUTCOME 3: ENGINEERING DESIGN
Learning outcome: Demonstrate competence to perform creative, procedural and nonprocedural design and synthesis of components, systems, engineering works, products or
processes.
Associated Assessment Criteria:
The candidate executes an acceptable design process encompassing the following:
1. Identifies and formulates the design problem to satisfy user needs, applicable
standards, codes of practice and legislation;
2. Plans and manages the design process: focusses on important issues, recognises
and deals with constraints;
3. Acquires and evaluates the requisite knowledge, information and resources: applies
correct principles, evaluates and uses design tools;
4. Performs design tasks including analysis, quantitative modelling and optimisation;
5. Evaluates alternatives and preferred solution: exercises judgment, tests
implementability and performs techno-economic analyses;
6. Assesses impacts and benefits of the design: social, legal, health, safety, and
environmental;
7. Communicates the design logic and information.
Learning outcome: Demonstrate critical awareness of the need to act professionally and
ethically and
to exercise judgment and take responsibility within own limits of competence.
MJ Grobler 2012-11-08