Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non-profit, non-political, educational organization, dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. We accept the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment"
to the
Constitution of the United States was meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists are organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning
religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough
understanding
of them, their origins and histories;
to encourage the development and public acceptance of a human ethical system, stressing the mutual
sympathy, understanding
and interdependence
of all people and the corresponding
responsibility of each
individual in relation to society;
to develop and propagate a culture in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of
strength, progress and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the study of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance,
perpetuation and enrichment of human (and other) life;
to engage in such social, educational, legal and cultural activity as will be useful and beneficial to
members of American Atheists and to society as a whole.
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and
aims at establishing a lifestyle and ethical outlook verifiable by experience
and the scientific method,
independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Materialism declares that the cosmos is devoid of immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by its own
inherent, immutable and impersonal laws; that there is no supernatural interference in human life; that man finding his resources within himself - can and must create his own destiny. Materialism restores to man his
dignity and his intellectual integrity. It teaches that we must prize our life on earth and strive always to improve
it. It holds that man is capable of creating a social system based on reason and justice. Materialism's "faith" is in
man and man's ability to transform the world culture by his own efforts. This is a commitment which is in very
essence life asserting. It considers the struggle for progress as a moral obligation and impossible without noble
ideas that inspire man to bold creative works. Materialism holds that humankind's potential for good and for an
outreach to more fulfilling cultural development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited.
********************************************************************
American Atheist Membership
Life membership
Sustaining membership
Family/Couple membership
Individual membership
Senior Citizen/Unemployed*
Student membership*
Categories
membership
$500.00
$100.00/year
$50.00/year
'.. $40.00/year
$20.00/year
S12.00/year
*I.D. required
All membership categories receive our monthly "Insider's Newsletter," membership card(s), a
subscription to American Atheist magazi ne for the duration of the membersh ip period, plus additional
organizational mailings, i.e. new products for sale, convention and meeting announcements, etc.
July, 1984
REGULAR FEATURES
Editorial
Ask A.A
,
The Atheist Next Door
Roots of Atheism
Historical Notes
','
American Atheist Radio Series
Potpourri
2
4
5
8
24
25
27
30
31
32
39
'
Dial-an-Atheist
Poetry
Atheist Masters
Letters to the Editor
SPECIAL FEATURES
Sexual Mutilations and Islam - Soledad de Montalvo-Mielche
Gurus and Genes - Todd R. Grace
In Search of a Story - Mike Kennedy
Did Human Gods Evolve from Ape-Gods? - Brian Lynch
That's Entertainment - Steve Penney
6
17
18
20
22
FEATURED COLUMNISTS
Lions: 35; "Christians''?; 0 - Gerald Tholen
I Am God - Margaret Bhatty
\ ............................
Editor
Robin Murrav-O'Hair
Editor Emeritus
Madalyn Murray O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Assistant Editor
Gerald Tholen
Poetry
Angeline Bennett
Gerald Tholen
Production Staff
Alexander Stevens
BillKight
Richard M. Smith
Gloria Tholen
Non-Resident Staff
G. Stanley Brown
Jeff Frankel
Merrill Holste
Margaret Bhatty
Fred Woodworth
Cover Art
Jeff Greenberg
Address
City
State
_
-L.Zip,
Address
City
State
28
37
_
Zip,
ARE YOU
MOVING?
Please notify us six
weeks in advance to
ensure uninterrupted
delivery.
Send us
both your old and
new addresses. Ifpossible, attach old label
from a recent magazine issue in the bottom address space
provided.
On The Cover
The Summer Solstice (Winter
Solstice south of the Equator) has
passed. Yet, the natural "magic" of
the season is yet' fully with us.
Perhaps it would be well for us to
consider the relatively slow passage
of the days and of time. If it were not
for the fact that Nature moves in a
timely manner, many of the events
that we ordinarily take for granted
would not occur at all.
\
The fruits of Summer take months
to develop, and the scenes of Winter
would would be but a momentary fit
of disagreeable humidity if not given
time to chill the environmental
scene.
Very fortunate indeed are the
folks who have learned to be seasonably patient: to endure, and to enjoy
the best that each season has to
offer.
It occurs to me that, on an average, each of us has only about 300
seasons to enjoy in a lifetime. I
shudder a bit when I realize that I've
already "used up" 220 of mine! It also
is slightly discomforting to note that
they seem to be now passing at an
accelerated pace. So, I've learned
that it is not at all wise to try to "hurry
time" along. I willenjoy every minute
of Summer - no matter whether it's
bit "too warm" now and then. I will
also enjoy the melons and the other
fruits that my local Summer allows
- the same as I did every cold or
overcast day of the Winter just past.
After all, we are simply products of
Nature, just as much as are the other
natural products and/or events at
hand, and in a continuing way.
Savor the seasons for as long as
they last. Appreciate that they are all
too brief.
G. Tholen
July, 1984
Page 1
EDITORIAL /
Jon
Garth Murray
Page 2
July, 1984
THE TRIVIA
fame to present "facts" about her article before we got to the
"emotional" part of the program between Falwell and myself. That
alone was enough to turn me off. The insinuation that Atheism was an
"emotional" thing that one can "grow out of' is ever present. The
station paid my airfare and I flew up to St. Louis and stayed the night
before the morning taping. When I got to the studio that next day, I
was just in time to see Mr. Falwell on the show in question live that
day, by himself with the host, the audience and phone calls. I watched
about the last fifteen minutes of the show in a staging area along with
our former St. Louis Chapter Director Richard Richardson. The
female host was just as sweet to little old "Dr." Falwell as the
proverbial southern belle down on the plantation. She simply fawned
over him in the most dripping way. He was "Dr." Falwell and had to be
shown much respect, had to be treated with much dignity and
decorum. After all, he was a "reverend." The studio audience of not
more than 50 persons were 90%female. They always are. They simply
loved "sweet little old loveable Jerry." It was all very "kissy kissy." Mr.
Falwell'sfive body guards took up the back row on one side. You
could have spotted them for "muscle men" a mile off.
July, 1984
Page 3
ASK A.A.
Dear AA:
About once each year I see a report
published somewhere to the effect that
"once again, the holy bible is the year's best
seller." I wonder why American Atheists has
never challenged the obvious deception
inherent in that ridiculous claim.
It's true that millions of copies of that
disgusting book are printed every year, but
precious few are ever purchased by individuals. Most of them are bought by large
organizations like the Gideon Society and
various christian ministries to be handed out
free of charge to anyone who willtake them.
I personally have fifteen bibles and have
never paid for one.
.
I have written several letters to various
newspapers pointing out the misleading
aspects of this outlandish claim and I would
like to see some type of national publicity on
the matter.
Joe Shanahan
Texas
Dear Joe:
Religionists, particularly those in the bible
business, refuse to giue any real statistics
about the sales. American Atheists has a
room full of bibles and neuer purchased
any. We agree with you.
What is euen worse, with all that bible
distribution, no one reads the damn thing
anymore.
The religionists lie. And they lie. And they
lie.
If you can get any actual figures as to how
many are purchased by what groups,
where and when, and how many are indiuidually purchased by persons walking
into book stores, we willpublish the same in
this magazine. We will also put that information in news releases in a continuing way
and place it on our radio and teleuision
forum programs.
Editor
Page 4
Dear AA:
Has any Atheist written a psychological
review of that great piece of fiction called the
bible? It seems to me that would be the most
logical approach.
In the very beginning of the book women
are degraded in a way that would make any
female feel guilty or have a guilt complex for
her entire life, assuming she were to believe
such nonsense.
The book also contains a lot of violence.
Those are just two examples of how
ridiculous the book actually is.
The book was obviously written by people who not only hated women but who
must also disliked normal human beings
who are more interested in happy, healthy
lives, rather than the violence, death and
destruction, which seems to be the main
theme of the book.
Iam sure ifsome intelligent, logical person
took the time and effort, they could expose
the book called the bible for what it is superstitious nonsense. That would apply to
any form of so-called "religion" as far as I'm
concerned.
David G. Simpson
New Jersey
Dear David:
From time to time we have had psychologists write concerning different aspects of
religion. However, the necessary analysis of
the bible has not really been made. Fragmental portions of the bible haue been
criticized and when those in respect to
underlying psychological precepts are sent
to American Atheists, we print them.
All we can ask is, "Is there anybody out
there who wants to undertake this?" If so,
get to us.
Editor
Dear AA:
I had previously written .to you for brochures on your organization and have found
them very interesting and enlightening. I
have considered a membership, but one
thing has stopped me. You mention many
great Atheists and their accomplishments,
but never have I seen anything on Ayn Rand
who, although she called herself an objectivist, was also an Atheist. I am a great
admirer of her, and though she is dead, she
continues to make a great impact on my life.
It bothers me that I haven't seen any mention of her in the samples I have received
from you. I welcome a reply.
Vicki L. Stevens
Michigan
Dear Vicki:
Ayn Rand is well-known, widely read,
and for many years she put out her own
newsletter, worked through an educational
organization, etc. Since she was so readily
avadoble to all, it simply seemed superfluous for us to add to the adulation. In
addition, Ayn Rand operated under copyright rules like the true laissez [aire capitalist that she was. We could not have printed
euen a paragraph belonging to her without
paying through the nose. And, we tried.
It is our considered opinion that when
Ayn Rand writes about Atheism she is one
of the true great intellectual champions of
that cause. However, we can't pay thousands of dollars to reprint those arguments.
They are availabte in your local library, or in
paperback books euerywhere. Read and
enjoy.
Editor
July, 1984
Do you feel that the general situation for Atheists has grown
better or worse in recent years?
I think it's hard to generalize aboutthat. On one hand, when I was
growing up we had less legalized religion. The nation's motto was "E
Pluribus Unum;" our currency didn't have "In God We Trust," and
the pledge of allegiance did not have "under God." But, on the other
hand, there were no Atheist TV shows or radio programs.
PageS
Soledad de Montalvo-Mielche
~J
July, 1984
Page 7
ROOTS OF A THEISM
DIDEROT
DENIS DIDEROT
(1713-1784)
enis Diderot was born in the old Roman town of Langres in
Champagne, France on the 5th of October, 1713. He was one
of seven children of a master cutler, Didier Diderot, and his
wife Angelique Vigneron Diderot, the daughter of a master tanner.
His parents, being persons of property, were able to provide
schooling for their son. His elementary education was received in his
own home, but at age ten he was qualified to begin his secondary
education, and in November, 1723, he was enrolled in the lowest form
of the jesuit college at Langres. He was an outstanding scholar, often
receiving meritorious citation and commendations.
At age 13, Diderot signed his intention of becoming a priest, and on
August 22,1726 the bishop of Langres conferred the tonsure on him.
As a result of this, he was entitled to be addressed as "abbe." In 1728
or 1729 he left for Paris to finish his last year of study at a Iycee, the
jesuit college of Louis-Ie-Grand.
Very little is known, but much speculation is made, of his lifein this
period. It is thought that he began to study some law in 1730. He was
Page 8
July, 1984
worked for three years on the project and it was brought out in
France in six folio volumes between 1746 and 1748 under the title
Dictionnaire universe! de medecine. He was assisted on the translation by (Marc-Antoine) Eidous and (Francois-Vincent) Toussaint.
The most famous book of the latter was his Les Moeurs, published in
1748 and condemned on May 16th of that year by the Parlement of
Paris. The book set forth arguments for a natural morality unbolstered by any religious belief or public cult. Thus, Diderot was, in
his associations, already in difficulty with the state.
"'The thought that there is no God has never frightened anyone, but rather the thought that
there is one, such as the one that has been described to me.' iPensee JX)"
In 1746 Diderot wrote his Pensees philosophiques,
which was
printed surreptitiously and then sold clandestinely by various book
bootlegging techniques. A family legend has it that the book was
written one weekend, at easter. A slim volume, no more than 10,000
words, it is possible that the feat was done in such short time.
Appended to the work was a short essay on the sufficiency of natural
religion. In this he had risen above the deistical plane of thought and
grappled with the fundamental issues which the deists took for
granted. The gist of the essay was to press the ordinary rationalistic
objections to a supernatural revelation, the rationalism of the day
being used as a convenient point of attack against christianity. This
book, published without license, produced a great sensation. Its
doctrines being thought unsound, it came under the scrutiny of the
highest court in the land, was condemned by the Paris Parlement in
an "Arrest" of July 7,1746, and was ordered to be
"torn up and burned ... by the High Executioner (i.e. the
common hangman) as scandalous, and contrary to Religion
and Morals."
The decree further stated that the Pensees philosophiques:
" ... presents to restless and reckless spirits the venom of the
most criminal and absurd opinions that the depravity of human
reason is capable of; and by an affected uncertainty places all
religions on almost the same level, in order to finish up by not
accepting any."
Much "underground literature" was afloat in France during this
era, but the boldness of Diderot's work set it apart.
"The thought that there is no God has never frightened
anyone, but rather the thought that there is one, such as the
one that has been described to me." i Pensee IX)
In eighteenth century France it was taken for granted that a function
*The title is also given as Shaftesbury's Philosophie morale, ou Melange
raisionne des Principes, Pensees et Reflexions (1745) (Inquiry Concerning
Virtue and Merit).
Austin, Texas
different idea:
"In its brilliant pages may be found a conspectus of the
intellectual life of the day, on the side of the religious problem.
Every type of thinker is' there tersely characterized - the
orthodox, the deist, the Atheist, the sheer skeptic, the scoffer,
the pantheist, the solipsist, and the freethinking libertine, the
last figuring as no small nuisance to the serious unbeliever. So
drastic are the criticisms of orthodoxy that the book was
unprintable in its day; and it was little known even in manuscript. A police agent seized the MS. while searching Diderot's
library and Diderot could not get it back. Malesherbes, the
censor, kept it safe for him by retaining it."
In it he presents the reply to the design argument which was adopted
by David Hume (1711-1776), Scottish philosopher and historian.
Arthur M. Wilson in his Diderot, The Testing Years, 1713-1759 sees
the Promenade in another light. "The allegory about christianity is
particularly searching and savage, giving in very thin disguise a critical
account of biblical history and christian institutions." He quotes the
work:
"Gentleness and peacefulness regulate our proceedings;
theirs are dictated by fury. We employ reason; they accumulate
fagots. * They preach nothing but love, and breathe nothing but
blood. Their words are humane, but their hearts are cruel."
Wilson sees in this work all the attributes of Diderot which were "to
make him the outstanding thinker of his century in the philosophy of
science."
In 1748, however, Diderot published his highly respected Memoires
sur differens sujets de mathematiques.
In this he made some
corrections in Newton's calculations of the effect on pendulums of the
resistance of air. The five mathematical papers dealt with the general
principles of the science of sound, with emphasis on music; a new
compass made of the circule and its involute; examination of a
*A bundle of sticks used to burn humans at stake.
July, 1984
Page 9
July, 1984
In
.-....
I
I
L~
_.
--=9,pu.,
I/?'J.
July, 1984
Page 11
/'/ I.,,"
1:
I'
,\
F'JJ
r:
\
I,:
,11(111,'(''''< t t..,.',.
,f
.....
f.:
'"",h., ..11
Page 12
July, 1984
<i
/'I./J
,.:.
:,.-,::
"'0.'-
:....::.
\cc--""''"'''''!~'--'''.J----'':.,.'----------~I~..r.
Austin, Texas
July, 1984
Page 13
reprintings and all new editions were brought up to 4,200. And, the
publisher asserted that three-fourths of the 4,000+ were taken up in
the provinces or by foreigners. The last of the letterpress was issued
in 1765. But it was 1772 before the subscribers received the final
volumes. At that time, the set consisted of seventeen volumes of text,
eleven volumes of illustrations and two volumes of analytical tables, a
total of23,135 pages and over 3,000 engraved plates. It was the largest
printing ever undertaken. During this twenty-four years, Diderot was
under harassing persecution, sufferings from a cabal of enemies, and
deserted by friends.
The jesuits remained always in "attack" position, particularly in
their Journal de Trevoux which, month after month, returned to the
battlefield. By 1752 it was evident that they were intent on destroying
the Encyclopaedia, and on February 7th of that year an Arret du
Conseil du Roy was issued to suppress its further publication, sale
and distribution.
"His majesty has found that in these two volumes a point has
been made of inserting several maxims tending to destroy the
royal authority, to establish a spirit of independence and revolt,
and, under cover of obscure and ambiguous terminology, to
build the foundations of error, of moral corruption, of irreligion,
and of unbelief."
The works were impounded, a preliminary to the jesuits' being given
the commission to continue with the Encyclopaedia. At this point an
ominous epigram was being circulated:
Je suis bon encyclopediste,
Je connais Ie mal et Ie bien.
Je suit Diderot la piste;
Je connais tout, je ne crois rien.*
Meanwhile, a wealthy family, one of the noblesse de robe of the
ancien regime, had simply purchased into a judgeship, and one son,
Chretien-Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malesherbes, was serving as
director of publications for the nation. He did not accept the
censorship required and wrote that
"It is unjust and impossible to domineer over opinions .... A
man who had read only the books that, when published,
appeared with the express consent of the government the way
the law prescribes, would be behind his contemporaries almost
a century."
In this crisis he suggested that instead of suspending the Encyclopaedia, that some substitute pages be inserted for the most
offending passages. At the same time Mme. de Pompadour, since
1745 the king's mistress, was an enemy of the jesuits and well
disposed toward the Encyclopaedia. In order to continue to issue the
volumes, Malesherbes offered ", . . to have all articles without
exception censored by theologians whome (sic) he would choose
himself." Volumes III, IV, V, VI, and VII were to be censored in
entirety by these three theologians. There was not, then, a single
article the manuscript of which was not initialed by one of the three.
But, at least, through intrigue in the royal house and with a friend as
the director of the publications of the nation, the Encyclopaedia
continued under the direction of Diderot instead of the jesuits.
Actually, one could say that the cultural elite of the time was
responsible for the publication. And, of course, it was Diderot who
continued to lead the fight. In a tiff with a jansenist bishop in 1752
Diderot wrote as follows:
"I know nothing so indecent and injurious to religion as these
vague declamations against reason on the part of some
theologians. One would say, to hear them, that men cannot
enter into the bosom of christianity except as a flock of beasts
enters into a stable, and that one has to renounce common
sense either to embrace our religion or to persist in it. To
establish such principles, I repeat, is to reduce men to the level
of the brute, and place falsehood and truth upon an equal
footing."
Page 14
July, 1984
sont petits." ("You know, Mister President, how great god is." "Yes,
and how small men are.") Upon his death, Diderot was the only man
of letters who was courageous enough to attend his funeral, which
was typical of Diderot and fuel for the fire of his enemies.
From Vol. V onward, Diderot was to begin again with his liberal
political articles. His articles on the "Egyptians" gave him the
opportunity to declare that Moses was a disciple of the Egyptian
priests, thereby undercutting the idea of the mosaic books being,
according to the theologians, histories of the first men. He disarmed
everyone by admitting to plagiarisms from earlier works, by candidly
acknowledging defects in his own writings, by correcting or editing
anew. Time and subsequent articles would take care of everything, he
was certain. He was a man with immense correspondence. Always he
maintained his independent spirit and was reknowned for his brilliant
conversation.
Diderot's candor concerned with his cross-reference system (the
Encyclopaedia was alphabetical) was also amazing. He explained the
organic relationships at great length. One of the purposes of cross
references, he said, was to contrast conflicting principles and to
overthrow ridiculous opinions that could not be frontally attacked.
He called France's established religion "a national prejudice." One
category contained "theology, sacred history, and the history of
superstitions." Throughout it all ran the theme that knowledge, to be
meaningful, had to be related to man. As he returned time and again
to morals and ethics, he expressed a theory that included both
heredity and environment, organization of culture and education of
the individual man.
'
The articles were carefully illustrated with engravings, approximately 1,000 of which finished plates were made by a man named LouisJacques Goussier. Many others were borrowed from the Academic.
The plates were issued in 1762 and 1777. The text from 1751 to 1776.
By the time Vol. VI had appeared, however, it was the least
controversial of all. The country had become educated by the
appearance of the first five and the Encyclopedists were increasing in
number and import. More and more of the most well known names
were by then willingto write for it. Rousseau, however, had begun an
intellectual break with Diderot also, for fundamentally he was a theist
and Diderot an Atheist.
In 1757 he decided to put his hand to playwriting and produced
Entretiens sur Ie Fils naturel (Conversations
regarding a bastard). It
consisted of three dialogues with the hero of the play, in which
numerous aspects of acting and dramatic composition were discussed.1t was a novel in techniques of staging and acting, emphasized
character analysis and had intellectual content. Diderot had become
the theoretician for genre serieux, He felt that the function of the
theater was to hold a mirror up to nature and to natural life.He did not
attack the unities of time, place and plot but rather he desired to show
greater realism, clear the stage of spectators and make the play
contemporaneous. He wanted to show various occupations and
family relationships. He called this sort of playa drame, i.e. a drama.
It was at this time that Frederick the Great singled out Diderot and
d'Alembert for honors. They were members of his Academy and had
brought learning also to his nation. Unfortunately, France was at war
with both England and Prussia and Diderot's general revulsion for the
political system of France was well known. Also on January 5,1757 an
assassin attacked Louis XV in the palace at Versailles with a doublebladed knife, wounding him slightly. The king, thinking that the attack
had come from the radical ideas in circulation, on April 16 promulgated a Royal Declaration that
"All those who shall be convicted of writing or having had
written or of printing any writing tending to attack religion, to
rouse opinion, to impair Our authority, and to trouble the order
and tranquillity of Our States shall be punished by death."
The jesuits were immediately ready to renew the attack just as Vol.
VII was published. The agreement to have a theologian review the
articles had continued with Vol. IIIand most of Vol. IV, but after that
the practice had faltered and stopped. Yet, on January 1, 1758
d'Alembert decided to withdraw from any further association with the
Encyclopaedia and Voltaire joined its critics. Diderot alone fought to
Austin, Texas
July, 1984
Page 15
July, 1984
cheered, such as when talking with d'Holbach who had just returned
from a visit to England in 1765. Of that conversation he wrote
i Memoires de Diderott
" ... the Christian religion is nearly extinct in England. The
deists are innumerable; there are almost no atheists; those who
are so conceal it. And atheist and a scoundrel are almost
synonymous .... "
One of his most intimate friends was Friedrich Grimm (1723-1807),
an author and philosopher. Paris, in Diderot's time, was the capital of
the intellectual activity of Europe, in philosophy, the stage, art,
poetry, literature, and from 1759 to 1779 Diderot wrote art criticism of
the annual exhibitions of paintings for Grimm, titled "Salons."
Generally, his articles on "Beauty" ("Essai sur la peinture") in the
Encyclopaedia shows that he had passed the metaphysical theories
on that subject also, for here again he insisted on the depiction of
mankind and nature. As a criterion of beauty he posited a
dependency of our perception of relationships, a sense of the
importance of context. Beauty is "
passed by way of our senses in
order to reach our understanding
"
Diderot, always, simply continued to write. There was nothing else
for him. In a sense there was no unity or tight theme. He wrote on a
broad span of subjects from a graceful trifle like Regrets sur ma vieille
robe de chambre to Le Reve du d'Alembert which undertakes the
ultimate constitution of matter and the meaning of life. He was a
totally free man, critical, not dogmatic. If method he had, it was to
take a hypothesis and work it out to the end. He contributed passages
to d'Holbach's Systeme de la nature, which was considered to be the
very bible of Atheism, first published in 1770.
Late in his life he attempted to sell his library to obtain a dowry for
his daughter. The empress Catherine of Russia heard of his straights,
bought the library for 1,000 pounds, and told him to keep it until she
needed it, but meanwhile she would pay him a yearly stipend for being
the librarian. He went to Russia in 1773 to thank her, and to have
general discussions with her.
As pointed out earlier, Diderot was a distinguished mathematician.
However, in order to belittle Diderot as an Atheist, a story was
therefore made up and widely disseminated concerned with his visit
to St. Petersburg. There, in the court and at the instigation of the
queen, the Russian philosopher, Leonard Euler (1707-1783), allegedly
offered to prove algebraically the existence of god. Therefore, in the
presence of the queen and the court, he gravely said to Diderot, in a
tone ringing with conviction,
"Sir, a + b" / z = x. Therefore, God exists. Reply."
Diderot's reponse, being other than one of embarrassment at the
nature of the crude proposition, has not been recorded. Later
biographers simply stated that the entire incident was a fabrication.
Diderot was a complete Atheist and Materialist and stayed that way
until the end of his life. He died on July 30th, 1784 and the last remark
he was heard to make to his daughter, shortly before his death, was
that" ... the first step toward philosophy is incredulity."
Todd R. Grace
nthe USA Today newspaper, June 10, 1983, there was a cover
story: "Genes: Science vs. Religion" which was concerned with the
potentials of genetic engineering.
First of all, it talks of all the excited reactionaries. and religionists
who are against people "playing god" and fear that genetic
engineering willturn humans into monsters or other such nonsense,
though it isn't stated quite that way. A quotation from one unmentionable: "Worst fear ... all of lifewould be reduced to ... a Brave
New World." Now, what this means I have absolutely no idea. I have
even seen this man on a talk show. and I still don't know what he is
talking about. Anyway, this man is working up a rousing protest to
genetic engineering, especially where humans are concerned. He has
even made a petition, signed by the leader of the Moral Majority, Inc.
amongst others.
Actually, all of this protest is long ahead of protocol; it willbe a while
before man is capable of applying such principles to human life, such
as cloning. People tend to be excessively jumpy as a whole, it seems.
But that's another matter. The point of my concern is a very
disturbing quotation near the end of the article: "But ... I think we
should have a national conference - theologians, doctors, lawyers,
politicians, to begin to discuss guidelines."
This actually came across as quite a shock to me when I read it, for
several reasons. First, theologians. Of what use, I ask in all
seriousness, are theologians? Theologians represent the religious
community, their religious doctrines and dogmas in particular, which,
it can be seen with a brief look into history, are perhaps the greatest
bar to progress that has ever beset mankind. Religion has been so
violently opposed to scientific progress in the past that I don't see how
a nonbiased account could be derived thereof. After all, what do
theologians know about genetic engineering?
It is important to mention that this conference was in fact held
sometime in late summer of '83, and, sure enough, the theologians,
doctors, lawyers, and politicians were there. Now I'll rephrase that
by DECAY
is YOUR 60D R4LlY
ALl- PDuJERFUt....?
Austin, Texas
July, 1984
,I .,
Page 17
Mike Kennedy
IN SEARCH OF A STORY
A
Suddenly a door opened and from within the craft came a small
creature. It stood only three feet tall and two feet of that length was
neck. Its head resembled the head of a hammerhead shark, without
the teeth. It had stubby legs and lengthy arms, each with six finger-like
extensions. The fingers were long, slender, multi-jointed, and without
visible fingernails.
My wife was not with me. I was alone in the clearing. Alone with an
extraterrestrial. I cursed the blind insistence my wife had exercised in
going to her ritual weekly church service. It seemed she had
dismissed without due consideration the emotional entreaties I had
mixed with reason and logic for her to abstain from the degeneracy of
religious involvement. If only she were here with me. If only someone
were here as a witness.
The extraterrestrial (e.t.) wattled up to me, totally unafraid, and
hung a small black box around my neck, for which I had bent down to
accommodate his efforts. A similar box hung from his long leathery
neck. The box on the e. t.'s neck turned red and a voice, mechanically
reproduced, came from his box.
The e.t. asked, "Are you human?"
I replied, "Yes."
The e.t. asked, "Are you male?"
I replied, "Yes."
The e.t. asked, "Can you speak for all human males?"
I replied, "No."
The e.t.'s black box again glowed red as he spoke, "Who can you
speak for?"
"I can speak for myself," said I.
The e.t. asked, "Is that all?"
My box glowed red as the mechanically reproduced voice
translated my words evenly, without tone or inflection, into the e.t.'s
language, "It is enough."
The e.t. asked, "Where may I find a human willingto speak for allof
humanity?"
"In nazi graveyards," said I.
The e.t. asked, "Anywhere else?"
"And in pulpits," said I.
The e.t. asked, "Do those of the pulpits have rights over others?
And can you deliver me to that central ruling group, those of the
pulpits?"
I asked, "Do you wish me to take you to our leader?"
The e.t. responded, "Yes,"
"We have none," said I.
Page 18
July, 1984
the Earth's lifeare chloroplast cells. Without these all other lifewould
perish."
The e.t. asked, "Are chloroplasts the givers of life?"
I explained, "They are the givers of life in that they are the first and
vital link in the chain of life."
The e.t. deduced, "Then chloroplasts must be the 'church' since
they are in such a commanding position. It seems fit that the givers of
life be the rulers of life."
I corrected the e.t., "No, it is not that which gives life that is
regarded as supreme. Rather it is that which threatens death and
death-beyond-death which rules supreme. It is the 'church', the giver,
liaison, interpreter and justifier of the death realms which is dominant
over life. Chloroplasts are regarded as the lowest form of life since
they do nothing more than provide life for the rest. Therefore,
chloroplasts have little authority beyond their own cell walls."
The e.t. mused, "This is not at all like the movie. Does human virtue
exist outside of cinema fiction?"
I explained, "Human virtue exists outside of church domain."
The e.t. mused some more, "This is all very strange. You seem to
imply that religion, specifically the church, is the universal governing
entity present within all of the Earth's many divergent political
powers. You also imply that the church is not wholly magnanimous.
Yet you say that the church derives power from and exists as a
representative of your deity. Does this mean that the god you worship
is an imperfect or evil being?"
"No," I said.
"The e.t. asked, "How then can your god be good when his
surrogate' order on Earth is not good?"
I answered, "The church made a mistake."
"What mistake?" the e.t. asked.
I replied, "The church had a choice between propagating a selfperpetuating acceptance of universal benevolence, a virtuous
brotherhood and sisterhood of humanity concerned with the truth
and the word of humanity - or to protect itself as an institution. They
chose to justify and secure their acts with the creation of a power
base, illusion."
The e.t. persisted; his red translator light glowing as must have
been his curiosity, "What was the mistake?"
I explained, "Seeking their power illusion, for they had no real
material force, they created god. For in the creation of god, the
church, although having no real power, became the most powerful
and highly placed force of human governance. After the creation of
god the church needed quarters suited for the illusion of their divine
power base and suited for the agents and subalterns within the
hierarchy of church politicals, and suited also to instill a foreboding of
. ancient, instinctual fear. The church built medieval-looking stone
fortress-like castles and called them the temples of god. From the
moment of the laying of the cornerstone of that first church building
and forever more the church has and will continue to protect that
institution of church, while propagating philanthropy willtake second
pew."
The e. t. asked, "What was the mistake? The church had to protect
itself. For if the church had been put under, what then of spreading
the word? What then of infiltrating mankind on a global basis, uniting
and bonding humankind?"
I replied, "The word of god was the purported purpose of the
church, therefore marketing of the word should have been, by the
charter of their business, the church's business."
The e.t. asked, "Is spreading philanthropy, given by god, not the
goal of the church?"
I answered, "No."
The e.t. asked, "Why is that?"
I replied, "Because the church does not serve a god. They created
god to be served by him, not to serve him."
The e.t. said, "But certainly you concede the benefits of global
unity, however serviced. If all the attention and investment of the
church had been applied to the word of unity, then the institution
could have, for want, crumbled. Then the word itself would be
threatened. Only a secure church could be certain of indefinite
propagation of the word."
I said, "But the church made another error."
Austin, Texas
The e.t. said, "I have not understood the first error, but do inform
me of this other."
I explained, "In the course of self-preservation and the adaptations
and manipulations necessary for continued survival in an everchanging world, the word was and is being continuously altered and
refitted into current applicability."
The e.t. asked, "Then the church does not proclaim a consistent
word of god?"
I replied, "Consistent only with their interests. Their interest is
survival and on that basis the church uses any means necessary."
The e.t. asked, "And primarily what means does the church find
necessary in their pursuit of survival?"
I said, "Distortion of the word. Interpretation of the word."
The e.t. shuffled his feet in the dust, and his translator glowed red as
it converted his piping squeaks and whistles into English, as he asked,
"How can man change the word of god?"
I answered, "He who writes the word makes the word. The church
wrote the bible, wherein their god came into being."
The e.t., catching on, inferred, "So then from the pen of man came
the word of god?"
"Yes," said I.
The e.t. exclaimed, "This information willindeed make good copy.
Who, male human, are you that I may attribute this story correctly?"
I was a bit confused and my translator glowed red as I averred,
"What matters my name? I am but a man."
The e.t. said, "Journalism has its rules. We wouldn't want anyone
thinking that from the pen of an extraterrestrial came the word of
man."
Puzzled, I queried, "Journalism? I thought you were on an
exploratory type of zoogeographical tour of the galaxy. Weren't you
gathering samples of life in the movie?"
The e.t. replied, "Oh, that wasn't me. That was a member of
another crew. But I suppose we all look alike to you."
I asked, "Then you are not E.T.?"
The e.t. replied, "I am whatever you wish to call me."
I said, "What do you mean?"
The e.t. explained, "As soon as I leave, you may say whatever you
wish to say about me. From the pen of man came the word of god. So
too, then, when I am gone, from the mouth of man willcome the word
of the e.t."
I insisted, "Not all men behave as does the church."
The e.t. said, "But that we can discuss at a later time. For now I
must be going."
I asked, "Where do you go in such a hurry?"
The e.t. answered, "To make an important phone call."
I asked, "Do you phone home?"
The e.t. replied, "I've really got to leave now. My editor is waiting."
I demanded to know, "What's the hurry?"
The e.t. answered, "Deadlines, always copy deadlines and the trip
took longer than expected so I'm really pressed for time."
I pleaded, "I've got questions to ask you. I've answered some of
your questions, can you not spare me some information about
yourself and your world and your people's power structure and
government and religions?"
The e.t. responded, "What makes you think my people have
religion?"
I asked, "Don't you?"
The e.t. said, "We are intelligent rational creatures."
I asked, "Then what type of global governance do you have?"
The e.t. responded, "I really don't have the time right now to tell
you more."
I said, "Then come back; talk with me again."
The e.t. answered, "Perhaps I will."
I asked, "Why perhaps?"
The e.t. replied, "If my editor likes this copy, perhaps he'll send me
back for a continuation of the story."
The e. t. then took the black translator box from me and gave me a
sort of nodding gesture of his head, which I returned. Then he
boarded his craft and without any noise or fury it was gone. I stood
alone, wondering.
July, 1984
00
Page 19
Brian Lynch
he origin of religion and the idea of god are buried deep in the
past, and it's difficult to know when early man (or manlike apes)
first invented gods to explain what they could not understand. From
what anthropologists, archaeologists and paleontologists have
discovered, religion, priesthoods and god ideas are very ancient. The
earliest gods were either deifications of dead people or mythologies
developed about animals and natural phenomena (known as
animism). Religious rituals and local tribal gods brought about social
control and some unity to the fearful, ignorant savages' lives. The
advent of religion and the idea of gods and unseen spirits as
controlling forces in nature enabled a caste of priests to rise to power
by pretending that they could "appease," interpret or control the
spirits or gods. This primitive dynamic is the basis for all of the
modern world's religions and god ideas.
With the discovery that humans do not comprise the only species
which possesses "intelligence," or a facility for manipulating environment to suit needs, we wonder if human god ideas are the only
ideas of god. It is known, for example, that dogs dream, dolphins and
whales can be taught to "perform," and that chimpanzees can solve
problems with as many as five "levels of ambiguity" (a level of
ambiguity is defined where an array of possibilities exists. For
example, a test where a reward is under either a round or square
cover on a red or green tray - under square if the tray is red, under
round if the tray is green - presents two levels of ambiguity).
Chimpanzees are of particular interest to humans because 99%of our
structural genes are shared with chimps, and because chimp social
interaction so closely resembles that of humans. Behaviorist Jane
Goodall has devoted years of study to chimp behavior, hoping that it
will reveal or give insights into human behavior. Goodall and her
fellowresearchers report that while the environment in which chimps
thrive is being encroached upon by the rapidly expanding populations
of developing African nations and the commercial interests of
temperate-zone nations, no chimp has ever attacked a human, and
chimps seem to comprehend the hierarchy of human organizations,
deferring more readily to "high-ranking" humans than to "lowerranking" ones.
It is always dangerous to ascribe meanings or attempt interpretations of non-human behavior when one doesn't fullyunderstand
the consciousness or brain capabilities of a non-human. It is tempting
Page 20
July, 1984
July, 1984
Chapter
Page 21
Steve Penney
THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT
T
July, 1984
being fought, Basil's youth had been fairly typical (except for the
above-mentioned incident). In 1922 the parson came to the house
requesting he be confirmed. Basil declined the request, which led to a
debate in which the parson asked him if he believed in the various
myths or not, and Basil said "No" to all of them! The parson said he'd
be back in a year, hoping Basil would change his mind. Basil used this
year to explore the validity of his views as to why he disbelieved in the
bible's supernatural tales, and in the process he learned what an
Atheist was. The parson returned; but this time the parson was
dealing with a more learned youth. His mother broke up this second
debate, saying, "If he doesn't want to be confirmed, he doesn't want
to be confirmed." Seeing he'd lost the battle, the parson yelled some
abusive comments to him and left in a huff, this time on a one-way trip.
At fifteen, some friends asked him to sing in a free-methodist
church choir. They put on social evenings - nothing to do with
methodism. Basil wanted to sing with them since he had his eye on
some pretty girls in the choir. He consented to do this, but refrained
from joining the church. They accepted him on his terms, due to his
booming baritone voice. Basil had proved himself as a good choir
singer but had gone beyond what they'd expected of him when he
proved (much to the chagrin of the deeply religious folks) that he, an
Atheist and an amateur, could sing an aria from Handel's Messiah. He
did it to prove to the organist that he could do more than "pop." He
also performed in such light operettas as Princess Chrysanthemum,
Dogs of Devon, and The Sleeping Beauty. (Basil is the type of singer
who is more concerned with a song's structure, rhythm and feeling
rather than its content. He grudgingly acknowledges the fact that
many of the classics and standards of today have a religious "bent.")
At age 21 he came to the U.S. Due to the Depression, he
experienced some lean years after his voyage. Basil had the
misfortune to come to the U.S. in 1929. The first place he tried to get
tooling and machine work had one thousand people in line ahead of
him. He tried for a month, queuing up at many other places when luck
struck. He got a job at Chrysler Plymouth division as a production
lathe operator working from six at night until six in the morning, six
days a week. He transferred to the day shift when the midnight shift
was terminated. He could see that the day shift would soon "get the
axe" also, so he quit Plymouth to get work at LeBaron's Custom
Body Shop as bench hand. He was laid off a few months later. (This
happened quite frequently during the early Depression years; you'd
get hired, only to be laid off in a month or two.) This first year for Basil,
who had come to the U.S. to seek better living conditions like many
other immigrants, had turned to disappointment. This first year
proved to be the same as the next three. In 1934 his luck changed; he
was hired by Ford Motor Co. This job he kept until he retired. In 1937
I
,.
All Night," and "The Age of Aquarius." There are other unpaid
regulars (the writer included), but Basil remains the big draw. He'll
come in and stand at the bar, talking to old friends until the crowd
chants his name. He'll pretend not to hear them at first ("Timing is
important"), but then he'll make his entrance into the main room and
drop his overcoat in the lap of a patron (a la Elvis) and proceed to
warm up the audience before he sings. His famous opening is "My
name is Basil Metabolism. I burn, therefore I am. I take my hat off to a
leaf because it's always taking carbon dioxide from body combustion,
liberating two atoms of oxygen and absorbing the carbon atom so
that I can rebreathe the oxygen. If it weren't for foliage we'd end up
dying of asphyxiation, or of laughter!" His most controversial
comment was when he mentioned the catholics belated apology to
Galileo. He called it "the pope's admission of guilt." Though brave,
honest and sarcastic at times, Basil has never been "skinned alive"
because he provides amusing anecdotes besides. He once met
Emmett Kelley, the clown from the Ringling Brothers Circus, at the
Inn and later fixed up a prop for his act - a radiator that opened up
and had a snake jump out. Basil fixed the spring in the mechanism.
Basil has performed with Van Cliburn, the pianist, at Interlochen,
Michigan. They met by accident at a tavern and decided to do
"Without a Song" and others. Only later did Basil find out with whom
he had performed.
For any Michigan Atheists, or vacationing Atheists, the Dakota Inn
Rathskellar in on John R., two blocks north of Six Mile in Northeast
Detroit. They offer good food, German beer, and a paid piano player.
Come in and introduce yourselves to Basil as members of American
Atheists and pull up a chair. He's usually there every Friday and
Saturday night and wears his Atheist pin. ~
machine and die work on tanks, aircraft wings and tail assemblies.
The Olivers eventually had six children and fifteen grandchildren.
Also a fine carpenter, he built his own home and own cottage up in
northern Michigan (which he recently lent to the Detroit Chapter for
a home base for our annual canoe trip).
Basil often debated fellow workmen in Ford's cafeteria when some
of them brought their religious books to proselytise. Once, a
jehovah's witness tried to convert him by telling him of the awesome
power of Jehovah. Basil corrected him, saying that the Hebrew
Jehovah was the same as the Greek Zeus, the Egyptian Amon, and
the Roman Jupiter. All,he said, were myths invented in b.c.m. (before
christian myth) times that tried to explain the actual planet Jupiter.
This great light in the sky caused ancient peoples to worship Jupiter
as a god. These stories evolved into what we have in a.c.m. (after
christian myth) times as stories of gods as men. Basil continued to
debate him (this time with some seventh-day adventists trying to
come to the witness's rescue); this time about some bible "miracles."
The religionists claimed that gawd put a star over christ's manger.
Basil corrected them, saying that the star was actually a comet
mentioned by the Roman historian Pliny. In this and other lunchroom
debates, Basil usually won the admiration of the workers and
foremen. Even his adversaries developed a grudging respect for him.
When Basil retired in 1968, he again found time to star in a musical.
He played the role of Fagan in Oliver. The part required little effort
since he was just playing himself! He joined the Orpheus Club, an
all-male choral group named after the orphics, a musical religious
movement (circa eighth century b.c.m.) dependent on the legend of
the oracle of Orpheus. (Orpheus was the supposed son of a muse, the
word from which we derived our word "music.")
Nowadays, Basil enjoys retirement by spending two or three nights
a week at the Dakota Inn Rathskellar, a pub at which he's been
leading singalongs since 1941. (The place has a history of its own. It
was a debating place for both pro-Axis and pro-American from '39'41. The FBI came around in late '41 to "case the joint." The alert
owners of the Dakota thought it would be a good idea to change some
of its German decor for the duration.) Basil leads the hundred-plus
audience in such standards as "Fiddler on the Roof," "Danny Boy,"
"Oklahoma," "Moon River," "Old Man River," "I Could Have Danced
i~
Cn.l~R . \N
T"~
lI)i~"~T
,\.\ E
'IN,."'to
C; 'N~1A.9
\~ i~E <5t.~.
~\R'
iN T~ i\-\t.~i~tS i~ i~ t
l. TC,
Austin, Texas
\.,.-c.
~\..~'"_.-
I!l~~
I!I\.A
WI{E.P.E ~~e.~o
CI4URC~
'1'00 Goi~C;
1 \oI~i TO
~tn. iH'
?RSNC
~oc1..
OF
July, 1984
Page 23
HISTORICAL NOTES
200 YEARS AGO ...
The Encyclopedist and Atheist, Diderot,
died. For more on this man, please see the
article on page 8 of this issue.
Page 24
FREETHOUGHT IN
THE EARLY UNITED STATES
Program #427; originally broadcast 1/21/77
When the first installment of a regularly scheduled, 15-minute, weekly American Atheist radio series on
KTBC radio (a station in Austin, Texas owned by then-president Lyndon Baines Johnson) hit the airwaves
on June 3, 1968, the nation was shocked. The programs had to be submitted weeks in advance and were
heavily censored. The series was concluded on October 18, 1975 when no further funding was available.
During the French and Indian War, Timothy Wyett in his Travels in
New England and New York wrote that "In that army there were
many Infidels. In spite of their professions to the contrary, all Infidels
earnestly wished to make proselytes." Well, now, isn't that a shame!
The thrust of the statement is that only the christians have the right to
that game.
Beginning with the period of the Revolution, deism increased by
leaps and bounds until it reached all sections of the country and the
population. Yet fear was abroad in the land, too. Benjamin Franklin
was in Paris and wanted to sell the idea of America to the French, so
he wrote: "Atheism is unknown there (that is the United States),
Infidelity rare and secret; so that persons may live to a great age in
that country without having their piety shocked by meeting with
either an Atheist or an Infidel." Think about that! This is the great
Benjamin Franklin appealing to the religious that their bigotry, hatred,
and intolerance could become dominant because of the fear of the
Atheist or the Infidel to make his position known.
But Franklin also regarded christianity as necessary in order to
inculcate morality in the lower classes. What he felt himself he
revealed in his autobiography: "I was scarce 15, when after doubting
by turns of several points, as I found them disputed in the different
books I read, I began to doubt revelation itself. Some books against
deism fell into my hands. They were said to be the substance of
sermons preached at Boyle's lectures. It happened that they wrought
an effect quite contrary to what was intended by them, for the
arguments of the deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared
to be much stronger than the refutations. In short, I soon became a
thorough deist.
Jefferson wrote simply, "I am a Materialist, which is the ultimate
Atheist position. In his will General Charles Lee desired not to be
buried in any church or churchyard or within one mile of any
presbyterian or anabaptist meeting-house, declaring that "since I
have resided in this country, I have kept so much bad company when
living that I do not choose to continue it when dead." John Randolph
of Roanoke asserted in 1813 that "I had become a deist and, by
consequence, an Atheist." George Washington's religious opinions
were probably a combination of irreligion and rationalism.
In Mecklenburg County, North Carolina a debating society
flourished for many years. What was outstanding about it was that it
circulated a library of Infidel literature. The College of William and
Mary was regarded as a hotbed of Infidelity and was charged to be
such by a bishop - which reminds us that William F. Buckley leapt to
fame in the United States by charging Yale with the same, At the
University of North Carolina one of the teachers donated a volume of
Thomas Paine's works to the University library. Even today we
cannot get Thomas Paine's religious works into university libraries, as
the stranglehold of religion on our institutions has increased, not
diminished, with time.
Thomas Jefferson's Secretary of War, General Henry Dearborn,
reported to have remarked about the churches, "So long as these
temples stand, we cannot hope for order and good government." At
Princeton in 1782 there were only two students who professed
July, 1984
Page 25
themselves to be christians.
Col. Ethan Allen, the hero of Ticonderoga, wrote the first violently
antichristian book, Reason, the Only Oracle of Man, in 1784. A
decade later Thomas Paine's Age of Reason, published in 1794,
became a sensation. The thrust of the book is an attack on
christianity, and it is more difficult to obtain it today in the United
States than in 1794. At one point 15,000 copies of it were shipped from
France in April, 1796 to Philadelphia, consigned to Benjamin Franklin's grandson. It was a bestseller throughout the country then.
Freethought lecturers, societies and periodicals began to appear.
One of the most widely known organizers of these lectures was a
Connecticut Yankee, Elihu Palmer. He attempted to organize
deistical societies; but although men of position and wealth secretly
professed deism, or openly professed it within their own rank, they
did not desire to have the common man accept it. This is shown in
some of the political documents of the time. The Constitution of New
Hampshire noted specifically:
"Morality and piety rightly grounded on evangelical principles will give the best and greatest security to government
and willlay in the hearts of men the strongest obligations to due
subjection."
One would think that the free men and women of New Hampshire
would erase this hypocritical and insulting admonition from their
Constitution, but it is today still contained therein. Palmer spoke in
New York, in Philadelphia, and where he could with lectures publicly
ridiculing bible stories, continuing this activity from about 1790 to
about 1805.
.
"Freethought lecturers, societies and periodicals began to appear. One of the most
widely known organizers of these lectures was
a Connecticut Yankee, Elihu Palmer ....
Palmer spoke in New York, in Philadelphia and
where he could . . ., continuing this activity
from about 1790 to about 1805."
In Newburg, New York a society organized in 1799 is reported by
religious historians to have burnt the bible, administered baptism to
dogs and cats, given the lord's supper to animals, and mimicked
numerous religious rites. The religious historians (and we are
rightfully always wary of them) say that this did not go unpunished, for
some were hung for murder, others shot or drowned, two destroyed
themselves by intemperance, one was eaten by dogs and another by
hogs. That's a likely story, isn't it!
One of the principal ideas which the deists or the rationalists or the
infidels espoused was that of divorcing the idea of morality from
religion. The religious historians, as I have just indicated, showed in
every way they could that morality was a handmaiden of religion, and
that only persons who would be eaten by hogs themselves or who
"destroyed themselves by intemperance" could advocate an irreligious or nonreligious life philosophy.
Palmer was good at this. He stole my theme from me by advocating
it a hundred years before I was born! He denounced religion as the
work of ambitious, designing, and fanatic men and declared that
religion was simply the means of keeping man in ignorance and under
the domination of royal butchers and ecclesiastical impostors. He
saw evilnot as the work of the devil, but as something created by man
since evil was due to ignorance. He believed that if there were an
adequate education given to every man, men would livea rational and
humane existence. And here I am over a hundred years later with the
same theme, and I never heard of Palmer before.
Of course, the French Revolution occurred about the end of the
18th century, and the clergy in the United States seized upon the
event, charging that all the horrors of the bloodshed there were
caused by the Infidel. The clergy scared hell out of the ruling class of
the United States. From the pulpit came a flood of arguments, abuse,
and threats to the rationalists, the deists, the freethinker; and the
Page 26
July, 1984
POTPOURRI
Accomplishments. There is nothing moral, fair or just about most christians. They use the christian moral code to intimidate others and
"ideally" seek to destroy others with it. In short, they use the christian moral code to set up a system of non-merit competition which rewards
appearances of morality, rather than rewarding ability, performance and the kind of merit which adds something in the way of progress to our
society.
Accomplishments, not "moral smokescreens," should stand for merit and garner rewards, ifwe are to grow as individuals and progress as a
society and a species. This is the only way to test and establish any kind of rational morality that will benefit everyone. Ronald B. Zei:
An Old Indian Fable. A young man once stumbled into an Indian village. "Help me!" he cried. "I am a christian."
"Prove it," said one of the Indians.
The young man promptly shot him dead, raped his wife, and burned up his tepee. The frightened Indians ran off to tell their chief what had
happened.
'That was no christian," their chief informed them. "A real christian would have killed all the rest of you, stolen your land and then, yes then,
claimed you were the savages.
.
.
Moral: Organizations and individuals should be judged by their practice rather than their platitudes. John B. Denson
Effective Action. Quotation from the catholic bishops' letter to end nuclear war (see American Atheist, Feb. 1984, article and analysis of letter
by Dr. O'Hair): "We for the cause of peace commit ourselves to fast and abstinence on each Friday of the year. We call upon our people to do
penance on Friday by eating less food and by abstaining from meat. Every Friday should be a day significantly devoted to prayer, penance and
alms-giving for peace."
TRANSLATION: We for the cause of peace commit ourselves to an institution for the insane (where we'll be out of the way and then there'll
be a real chance for peace in this world). We call upon our people - the rest of you can fend for yourselves - to look sinful and skinny on one
day of the week. (This is always Friday, when there's nothing like a good fish fry to get you in the mood to think of god and the end of the world.
Besides, you won't feel so bad starvin' on Friday in case you don't like fish, if you know it is close to the big after-mass Sunday dinner which
should make up for the lack of favorite foods on Friday.)
Sorry about that long-winded digression, but that's our business for you -lottsa words. Now back to Chapter I, verse 1, line 6, ending with
the word "week" - And pep up the fish biz by layin' off meat (but only for that one day 'cause our boss may own stock in a salami company or
Polish sausage factory now). As for those other six days, suit yourself - and aren't you glad you're not jewish? That bacon goes mighty good
with eggs at after-mass Sunday brunch.
But the holiest thing you black and white sheep can do for peace is to watch for our fourth (fifth and sixth) coming drive to raise alms (for
dummies, that means lottsa mazoola, not what you have stickin' out either side of your shoulders). You know, our funny kind of language
always gives our begging business class and distinction - and after all we're very classy and distinctive guys - 'specially when we get dressed
up for our Sunday shows in Liberace-like capes and hats with precious jeweled candelabras and drinking cups sparkling all around us. Hmm,
wonder where he got his decoratin' ideas from? Anyway, you know what willhappen in a nuclear war and you can't say we didn't tell you what
to do to stop it. Just because god slipped up and gave a great gift of this bomb to us (see rants and raves of our gal Phyllis Schlafly on this"), that
doesn't mean we are not obligated to do his dirty work and get rid of it.
So don't worry ifhe seems a little on the deaf and dotty side from listening to trillions and trillions of prayers for thousands of years - and he
missed hearin' all of them. Let's allpull together and give him one more chance 'cause this is gonna be our last one, and don't you forget it when
we pass that collection plate around (twice) to pay for the privilege of talking to god direct and for all the work we do to set up this direct line to
heaven from our beautiful buildings with fancy high steepled antennas in every (preferably rich) neighborhood.
Oh, this is not all we have to say about such an important event as the end of the world. We'll be readin' and writin' more letters - and most
important, doin' our arithmetic when we add up what's in those collection plates. But don't worry if you miss any more letters. They won't be
much different since we haven't had a new thought in our heads or a solution to any problems you've got since we were a cozy cult livin' in the
catacombs; but you can be proud of the progress we have made with allyour sacrifices in giving so much of your money to us so that our simple
cult (which those dumb pagans called weird) could climb out of those dirty, damp catacombs into grand cathedrals where we can pray in the
proper atmosphere befitting our high station in lifeand where it is more comfortable to be able to ask god to help those poor starving people in
the world. Please, you poor moms and pops in South America, Central America, Mexico, Italy, Spain, United States, etc., we'll get to you as
soon as possible; just give us another eight hundred or more years.
So, so long for now and may god bless, and remember you can always bank on (or with) us. Sincerely, The Good God Guys. Louise Bra!
*"The atomic bomb is a marvelous gift that was giLJento our country by a wise god." - Phyllis Schla!ly
Austin, Texas
July, 1984
Page 27
July, 1984
July, 1984
Page 29
DIAL-AN-A THEIST
CHAPTERS OF AMERICAN A THEISTS
The telephone listings below are the various message services
where you may listen to short comments on state/church
separation issues and/or viewpoints originated by the Atheist
community.
DIAL- THE-ATHEIST
Tucson, Arizona
Orange, California
S. Francisco, California
Denver, Colorado
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Tampa Bay, Florida
Atlanta, Georgia
Chicago, Illinois
Central Illinois
Des Moines, Iowa
Lexington, Kentucky
New Orleans, Louisiana
Boston, Massachusetts
Detroit, Michigan
Reno, Nevada
Northern New Jersey
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Portland, Oregon
Houston, Texas
Dial-a-Gay-Atheist
Salt Lake City, Utah
Northern Virginia
Virginia Beach; Virginia
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Schenectady. New York
Page 30
July, 1984
(512) 458-5731
(602) 623-3861
(714) 974-7110
(415) 668-8085
(303) 692-9395
(305) 584-8923
(813) 577-7154
(404) 962-5052
(312) 772-8822
(217) 328-4465
(515) 266-6133
(606) 278-8333
(504) 897-9666
(617) 969-2682
(313) 721-6630
(702) 972-8203
(201 ) 777-0766
(505) 884-7360
(405) 677-4141
(503) 771-6208
(713) 664-7678
(713) 527-9255
(801) 364-4939
(703) 280-4321
(804) 588-0118
(416) 277-4663
(518) 346-1479
The American Atheist
CHARLATANS
I MET A LOVELY LADY
WHO WORKED SO HARD YOU SEE
TO HELP SOME LITTLE CHILDREN
TO LIVE LIKE YOU AND ME.
SHE BUILT A WONDERFUL BUILDING
TO HOUSE THESE LITTLE TYKES;
MY SISTERS
Or we can keep silent and wait for the biggest blast or maybe, if
we lucky, we die before. One by one.
Around our tombstone they gather and say, "Yeah, things is
getting bad. But wasn't she a good girl? Kept her dishes
and her nose clean, And we sure that when she drawed
her curtains down, she just be watching TV."
Wheels keep rolling on and over us. But we used to pain and
we can't see who to blame, so we smile and say, "OK"
(No teeth. Done give them up for the kids or else had them
knocked out.)
And who listens to a flabby-lipped old woman with no bite
anyway?
BANG! CRY LOUDLY! That last door slamming
come soon,
last long.
That sound we hearing is the resurrection chorus and this is
the song:
Wake up Dead Sisters and die early no more!
Paula Lawson
Austin, Texas
Reggie Ball
July, 1984
Page 31
A THEIST MASTERS
July, 1984
But there is no record on the face of the earth that priest with the
bible in his hand ever helped woman to slip her halter.
Yet bible religion flourishes in all these lands like a green bay tree.
The women in the slums of christian London and New York receive
no more consideration than the women in the slums of Pekin, Hong
Kong and Bombay.
If the nations which give the most consideration to women do so
because of their christianity.. then it logically follows that the more
intensely christian a class or individual may be, the greater consideration willbe shown their women.
The most intensely christian people in christendom are Negroes,
yet it is an incontrovertible fact that Negro women receive less
consideration, and are more wronged and abused than any class on
the earth.
The women of the middle and upper classes in the bible lands
receive consideration just in proportion to the amount of intelligence
and worldly goods possessed by their male relatives, while the pauper
classes are abused, subjected and degraded in proportion to the
ignorance and poverty of the men of their class.
The church is the channel through which bible influence flows.
Has the church ever issued an edict that woman must be equal with
man before the canon or the civil law?
Throughout christendom woman is today a silenced subject before
her ecclesiastical and civil lawgivers. Any church councilor national
or state legislature in christendom would spurn the idea of consulting
with women. None of these are yet wise enough to recognize the fact
The American Atheist
July, 1984
Page 33
July, 1984
"Ifthe clergy would fairly discuss bible commands for women with such women as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Helen M. Gardner, Marilla
M. Rucker, Harriet M. Closz and many others,
they would cut a sorry figure; but they will
never do this, ... so they quiet the questionings
of their female flocks by telling them that
women who question are breaking god's law."
Monogamic marriage is the strongest institution of the christian
system.
The bible teaches that all the men of the old testament were
polygamists, and christ and Paul, the central figures of the new
testament, were celibates and condemned marriage by both precept
and example. In christian lands monogamy is strictly demanded of
women, it does not demand a white life for two. In all christian lands
large classes of men practice bigamy, trigamy, and polygamy. These
conditions certainly cannot be claimed to elevate woman.
Largely the majority of men have one legal wife, but assisted by a
small pack of youths and bachelors christendom ma(illegibleed.) ... several millions of outcasts ... (illegible - ed.)
pariahs of
society.
Thousands of wretched women are yearly driven to degradation
and the potter's field, while manhood is degraded by deception and
dissipation. Surely in the face of these actual conditions the claim that
christian civilization alone elevates woman falls to the ground.
I do not say that christianity has caused all the wrongs, miseries,
and woes that women have suffered, but I do say that christianity has
never made an effort to remove them, and yet in the face of these facts
the claim is made that christianity alone has elevated, advanced and
protected woman.
If we, as a nation, desire to be true, heroic, noble and sublime, we
must remove the iron grasp of ecclesiasticism from the brains and
hearts of mothers of the race, we must utilize the mental and moral
forces inherent in woman.
These are far more valuable than the wealth of our coal, iron, oil or
gold fields.
The ownership of the wife promulgated under bible teachings, and
the vow required of woman at the marriage altar to obey the man with
whom she links her fate, is the tap root of the domestic warfare which
reigns throughout christendom today. Women who make a vow to
obey, which they never expect to keep, and never do keep, can only
give birth to cowards, deceivers and criminals, and all priest-ridden
and policed civilizations swarm with these classes.
The christian clergy from their pulpits reprove women for not
bearing more children, in the face of the fact that millions of children
that have been borne by christian women have been targets on the
battlefield, or are homeless tramps, degraded drunkards, inmates of
The American Atheist
READER SERVICE
SEND A GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONI
Addres.s
(Please Print)
Citv
State
--LZip
TO SUBSCRIBE TO AMERICAN
MAGAZINE OR TO RENEW
YOUR PRESENT SUBSCRIPTION!
ATHEIST
_
(Please Print)
Address'
City'
State
Zip
categories are
$40/yr
065+/ unemployed*; $20/yr
Student*; $12/yr
Info packet only; free
o Individual;
o
o
Partner
Name
(please Print)
Address,
City'
State
--LZip,
Sa nk Code'
Signature'
Austin, Texas
July, 1984
_
Exp. Date.e
_
Date
Page 35
L.ETTH
~N.EVE-LET'S
_FORA~WIM!
5~E
=-
Page 36
July, 1984
TheAm encan
.
Ath eist
.
lAM GOD!
lflfr lf~
f~ f1&ifl(,
qnf.N~Rft'fn~ !
ar'J4N 1"1
If ~.
'"
esus has come! All good christians can stop looking for the
messiah, starting NOW! He is Indian, 58, hermaphrodite and
diabetic. He sports an immense golliwogwig which, he says, is his own
hair with every filament standing upright from psychic energy, and his
favourite pastime is conjuring, which includes healing diseases from
any distance, producing holy ash out of the air and coughing up small
stone phalluses. Those who attended the Helsinki World Atheist
Meet last year will remember the kind of magic B. Premanand
demonstrated, and this is particularly used by our "messiah."
What proof has he of his divinity? He says he is mentioned in
revelations 19, which describes christ riding out of heaven on a white
horse, with eyes like flames of fire and a sword emerging from his
mouth to smite the wicked nations of the world. "On his head were
many crowns, and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he
himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood, etc." This,
he claims, refers to his own saffron robe.
However, his horizons are wider than the original jewish preacher.
He also comes as a messiah for the hindus - Kalki on a white horse,
the tenth and final avatar of the god Vishnu, destined to descend to
earth when all spiritual and social life has degenerated to its lowest.
Kalki, too, willride through the earth, holding aloft his fiery sword to
destroy the wicked, renew creation and initiate the mahayug, great
age, equivalent of the christian millenium.
There is much speculation about the actual physiology of this
androgynous messiah, but since Indians still subscribe to the
primitive belief that deformity and physical defects are sometimes
manifestations of divinity, he fits into the scheme of things. His
devotees see him as a living incarnation of the half-and-half concept
seen in the he-she images of Shiva, whose male nature is counterpoised with the one-breasted torso depicting the female principle of
shakti, in the ultimate reconciliation of opposites.
Tal Brookes, an English seeker after "truth," traversed all of India
until he found his spiritual guru at this godman's ashram in Bangalore.
But then he discovered that, in addition to conjuring, the deity
enjoyed debauching young white males among his foreign devotees.
Shaken by his traumatic experience, Brookes returned home to write
an indictment in a book called Lord a/the Air, which he hoped would
be a warning to other christians who stray from the straight and
narrow.
It isn't clear what impact this messiah has on muslims despite his
efforts to out-Mohammed the prophet. He also claims to be the
reincarnation of a famous muslim saint of western India called Sai
Baba of Shirdi. As this man's come-back, he calls himself Satya (true)
Sai Baba. Inasmuch as good muslims go straight to paradise to
disport themselves with houris, it is a little puzzling as to how the soul
of the original Sai Baba chose to return, and that, too, in the body of a
hindu kafir (infidel).
But whereas the original saint was a true ascetic, this incarnation is
among the most' powerful of Indian godmen. Jurists, judges, politicians, eminent scientists, educationists and businessmen are among
his devotees, all overawed by his conjuring. His tentacles spread into
many departments of government, as Premanand discovered when
he tried to get a passport to travel abroad. He owns wealthy trusts,
Austin, Texas
rn~IfR ~GI~
qft 1UfTl( mffitt,
..
!!
fcr:r~ ~f1{
~cr;r''f~,
I!
SIf
..;---t:
~~qllq
~Pl
",,"elf "",
~"$
July, 1984
Page 37
00
ROSE
~ W~
NEXT!
Page 38
July, 1984
Editor,
I have a terrific idea: Print up some toilet
paper with bible scriptures on it (for example, the ten commandments). Then put
some of it in the national Atheist Center in
Austin. The rest of it you could sell to
Atheists all over the country. It would be fun
to wipe with it.
Tom Osmundson, Jr.
Virginia
Editor,
The pope's behavior cannot be condoned, but class people can help neutralize
him with actions other than namecalling of
the type exhibited in the April issue of
American Atheist. The pope is still another
tool of god, whatever that natural power is,
that is a butcher that subsists on pain and
shame and death. Anyone who believes in
the Atheist Manifesto printed opposite page
1 should understand mankind's position in
the evolutionary process, and Atheists
especially should get involved in teaching
and constructive example-setting. The ultrareligious are principally victims of predatory
parenting, a practice which will never be
allowed to cease if god has his way. Except
for the trappings, what has really changed in
the arena of pain and shame and death? Or
perhaps ever will except for the understanding which you are trying to bring
about.
Edward T. Piers
California
Editor,
I would like to share my solution to one of
the disadvantages an individual encounters
when rejecting the viewpoint and lifestyle of
the majority as was pointed out by Clarence
Darrow on page 26 in the April '84 issue of
A.A. magazine. My solution deals specifically with the problem of short and superficial
friendships which can lead to loneliness,
Austin, Texas
Editor,
I recently went to see a movie called
"Children of the Corn." It is based on a short
story by Stephen King. It was not only a
good horror show, but an excellent commentary on the negative aspects of religious
cults.
It centers around a cult started by a child
and consisting of children who kill off their
parents. They take over a whole town and
make child sacrifices also. The cult is foiled
by a newlywed couple who stumble into the
area of the cult's operation (a dismal corn
and bible-belt section of Nebraska) and
after much chasing around finally figure out
what is going on. Near the end we are
treated to some special effects and an
unleashed hideous supernatural creature
that fed off the children's sacrifices and/or
gave the child preacher his mesmeric ability
to captivate audiences.
I didn't think the supernatural was necessary at all, as the movie did very well
without it. It was blood-curdling to the max.
But all in all I think it was most excellent fun
July, 1984
Editor,
I have a book by Thomas Paine, patriot in
the American Revolution, printed by Freethought Press (New York City), called The
Age of Reason. The owner was Joseph
Lewis, who died, and his book publishing
business with him.
If you printed this book in paperback and
gave it to your "followers" for the price of a
membership, you would go far in combatting tremendous religious growth in the
U.S.
I would loan the book to you, if you
promised to return it to me. When and ifyou
read it, you will see what I mean.
Sam Wolfson
Florida
Dear Sam:
We are happy to inform you that at this
very writing we are in the process of reprinting in paperback format Thomas
Paine's Age of Reason. We will be advertising its avai/ability in the very near future.
Thanks for your concerned interest in one
of the world's true literary classics.
Editor
Editor,
I'm pleased to accept membership in
your organization. I like especially your
articles on Atheist history, and Ms. Bhatty's
articles on religions of India.
I wish, however, that you would print
fewer articles attacking judeo-christianity.
Most of us are already turned off by that
religion and that is why we are supporting
your organization. I'd like to see more
articles 1) thoughtfully analyzing eastern
religions and religious cults, 2) covering the
psychological aspects of religion (I am
thoroughly convinced that religion is not so
much a logical exercise as it is an egodefense, which means that our logic falls on
deaf ears), 3) actually developing a humanistic system of ethics based on living in the
here and now, rather than just talking about
it.
Frederick L. Artiss
Maryland
Page 39
Editor,
I just finished reading over again Dr.
O'Hair's speech at the 1982 A.A. Convention in Washington, D.C. I was very moved.
by what she said. What really struck a cord
was the letter from Ellen Mardan. I understand her feelings. As the director of a
Chapter of the Prison Atheist League of
America, I find my biggest problem is all the
fault-finders, criticizers, and just plain lazy
Atheists I have to deal with - not to
mention the religious ITUtSwho are daily
throwing their material into my cell area. I
have enough trouble as it is with the prison
officials without having to listen to a bunch
of my own members argue over petty
gripes. We are Atheists and we have a
serious problem in this country. As you
stated in 1982, we are teetering on the brink
of a Dark Age to which the religious forces in
this country have brought us. I can only
hope that Atheists organize and educate
themselves to the real dangers that we face
here in 1984. To some extent I'm honestly
afraid that we are slipping into a policechurch state, and that would be like going
back in time 200 years.
At the present time our PAL newsletter
has been banned throughout the Virginia
prison system. Mr. Arnold Via still sends me
a lot of Atheist material, so I'm not completely lost for educational books concerning
Atheist precepts. Also, I'm a member of
American Atheists, so I receive newsletters
et cetera from you.
Right now I'm in the hole; so is the
Secretary of the Chapter of PAL here at
Staunton State Prison. We were put here on
drummed up charges for 20 days. The
prison officials also transferred two of my
members to other prisons last week. I
believe this is an attempt to undermine our
organization. That won't be an easy job. My
members are committed Atheists, ifnothing
else. So I hope the pressure that the Chapter of PAL is under here will weed out the
lazy fault-finders and leave me with Atheists
who will band together and stand strong
against the harassments of the religious nuts
who work here and are inmates here. Atheists need to band together more and more.
We don't need petty fights among ourselves; we need respect for each other. We
need to act with intelligence and common
sense. That is the only way we will accomplish our goals: "Freedom from religion"!
I expect to be harassed from time to time.
That's all a part of being an Atheist in a
system made up and put together by religious nuts. We'll keep up the fight on our
end. I know you'll continue the struggle. I do
appreciate all you've done for your fellow
human beings over the years. Your work
Page 40
Dear Leroy:
You are to be commended for "hanging in
there" for Atheism. Your personal fortitude
speaks for itself (as does Arnold Via's). As
you remain confident, better times will
follow. Rest assured that Dr. O'Hair and all
the other determined Atheists will "keep on
keeping on."
Editor
Dear Irving:
Plans are in the works for the use of a
3-columnformat beginning with the September, '84 issue.
- Editor
Editor,
I'm chagrined that I may never meet the
people whom I should be meeting - those
who "see" things the way I do. I'm just a
clerk and can't really afford to attend April's
Kentucky Convention. Today for the first
time I was introduced to your publication I'm almost ashamed, but elated. It is certainly refreshing to know that there are humans
amongst the droves of zombies. I guess
being highly conditionable is both blessing
and curse (Excuse the religious-type words.
At times my vocabulary is quite limited.)
Milton Lumley
New Mexico
Dear Milton:
We're sorry you couldn't make it to our
national convention. But at least you can
experience it vicariously by reading all
about it in the August issue.
Editor
Editor,
I subscribed to American Atheist a few
months back. Though pleased with most of
the content, I find the readability of the 2column per page and the full measure
across the full page difficult to read. As a
retired graphic designer and interested in
the publication, I thought to offer some
suggestionsJ:o improve the readability. The
9/10 point Souvenir Light by 13 picas (i.e. 3
columns per page) is fair enough. When it is
stretched to 22 picas, it is too small, and I
suggest 10/11 and not to go to the full page
width at all, unless some special need has
arisen, and then might consider 11/13. True,
this will mean one or two less articles per
issue; on the other hand, it willbe less tiring
to read. When I designed such periodicals,
my first consideration was the ease with
which they could be read, and I think that
July, 1984
Editor,
Dr. O'Hair and Merrill Holste have done a
splendid job, as usual, in the April issue with
their astral origins of religion and Aten-sunworship. Add some John Allegro and the
picture brightens even more.
Visualize the sun, whose fiery glans is the
great charioteer of the heavens, crossing
the sky, then plunging into the vulva of
mother earth at eventide - and in the
morning coming forth like a bridegroom
from his marriage chamber.
Imagine the first "wise men" contemplating the heavens while nibbling red mushrooms, and becoming "enthused." Why,
these "sons of thunder" sprang from "the
star of wonder"! Each "little god" was the
fruit-of-life from the grand union of Mother
Earth and Heavenly Father. And each "star
of the ground" was a microcosm of the
whole fertility process.
Myth is fascinating stuff - full of power
and pathos. It carries universal messages
symbolically ("spiritually") reflecting our
biological impulses encountering the environment. Lovely to learn from; deadly to
dogmatize.
Ann D. Robertson
Virginia
NOTICE
Letters to the Editor must be either
questions or comments of general concern to Atheists or Atheism. Submission Should be brief and to-the-point.
Space limitations allow that each letter should be 200 words or (preferably)
less. Please confine your letters to a
single issue only. Mail them to:
American Atheists
P.O. Box 2117
Austin, TX 78768-2117
Thank you.
$2.50
AMERICAN ATHEIST
A Journal of Atheist
Twentieth Anniversary
Please send __
Name
@ $5.00 autographed
Address
_
_
City~~------------------------------------State
Total $----
----------------Zip--------------------
AMENDMENT I
CONGRESS
>
tT1
(/)
--l
>
~
-::r:
l'
tr:
~
tT1
--l
o
-n
iO
tT1
-o
z
l'
"
o
iO
"tj
iO
-::r:
ee
--l
--l
::r:
tT1
"Tl
iO
tT1
tT1
tT1
;X
tT1
iO
o
(/)
tT1
:~03}I3H.l