FY2001 Approved Budget (263 Pages)

APPROVED FISCAL 2001
ANNUAL BUDGET
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
FISCAL 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary 1
Annual Budget Summary ..............•..•......................... 3
Organization and Staffing ...........•........................•.•••.. 9
Operating Budget 17
Ridership and Revenues 29
Metrobus .......•...•••.•.........•..........•......•..•.......••...... 39
Financial Tables .•...................................•..•...•.•. 42
Statistics •...................•.........•..•....••..•......•....... 45
Regional I Non-regional Costs .....•....•.••......•........ 53
Metrorail •...............•........•..............................•..•.•. 61
Financial Tables .................•......•.....•.••...•.••....... 64
Statistics ...•........•......•.............................•••..... 67
Metro Access ................•.......•...........•..••.••............. 81
Debt Service •..••.......•..........••...••....•..•...............••... 87
Professional and Technical Services .••.•.....•...........••.. 91
Union Statistics •........•......•........•...•....•..••...•........... 95
Fringe Benefits ..........•..••..•........•....•................••.•... 99
Infrastructure Renewal Program........................................ 103

Overview ........................••.....•..•......................•..• 105
Financial Tables ..............................•.• "' ....•..........• 107
Project Descriptions •..............................••..•.......... 11 2
Rail Construction Program 139

Financial Summary .................................•.............. 141
Funding Sources ...............•.......•........................... 144
Project Summaries
Franconia/Springfield Line 147
Glenmont Line ......•.....................••••................ 149
Mid-City Green Line 151
Branch Avenue Line ...............•.......••..............• 153
Reimbursable Projects 155

Operating Projects ......•................•••......••............... 157
System Improvement and Expansion 161
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction 165

Operating .............•...••.............. 0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 167
Infrastructure and Renewal Program 183
Rail Construction Program II 190
Resolutions of the Board of Directors 197

" ;' . I ":': 1. -.
- . ~. I'
I.;; ..
:1 \. I ~
;. ; t 1
/
j ." r· " ,
i
j
J
I \
I ..
~ ;
";
I
.~
I
-'
,j
iI
..:.r-, _.
' l '~
I ;' :.:.
'i
II \ r
I
11
.~
1 ,f
I I
j This Page Not Used

I
,I
:1
I,
;I I,
i '. ~ \ '~ •
I:
''''': . -~.~ ..
". :)'," . /'
',.,',', .,1:". I
I
'\,
I
I,
I:
,i
I
h
. ,r. .t:
I~ •
'I. ,.'.'
ANNUAL BUDGET
SUMMARY
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Summary
Page 1
This Page Not Used
Summary
Page 2
APPROVED FISCAL 2001 ANNUAL BUDGET
OVERVIEW
WMATAts Fiscal 2001 Combined Operating and Capital Budget exceeds $1.7 billion and
is approximately $600 million larger than the Approved Fiscal 2000 Budget. It includes
five elements:
System Operating Budget $755.9 million

Includes the cost to operate Metrorail, Metrobus and MetroAccess Paratransit
services, and Debt Service
Infrastructure Renewal Program $677.3 million

Includes funds to repair and replace Metrorail and Metrobus assets
Rail Construction Budget $ 84.8 million

Funds completion of the 103-mile Metrorail system, the construction of a rail yard
at Branch Avenue and the purchase of rail cars
System Improvement and Expansion Budget $229.9 million

Includes Capital Reimbursable Projects requested by individual local
governments or other entities, and funds to work on projects in the Board
Approved Transit Service Expansion Plan,' such as the Addison Road/Seat
Pleasant to Largo Town Center extension of the Metrorail Blue Line, and
preliminary work on a new Metrorail station 'at New York Avenue and a transit
extension to Tysons Corner and Dulles Airport.
Reimbursable Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $11.7 million

Includes operating funds for reimbursable services requested by individual local
governments or other entities, such as the operation of the Potomac and
Rappahannock Transportation Commission bus service, selected Montgomery
County Ride On bus routes, Falls Church Hybrid - Electric Bus service program,
and providing technical expertise and resources to support the District of
Columbia's Department of Public Works.
There are a number of significant changes and program initiatives included in fiscal
2001. While the 103-mile rail constructi<?n budget continues to decrease as work on the
originally planned system is completed, new commitments are being made to further
system expansion. This year funds are included to begin construction on a two station
extension of the Metrorail Blue Line from Addison Road/Seat Pleasant to Largo Town
Center in Prince George's County, Maryland. In addition, WMATA will" work with its
local, state and federal partners to pursue transit system improvement and expansion
projects that will meet the current and future needs of the Washington metropolitan area.
Improvements at the Mt. Vernon Square/UDC Metrorail station on the Green and Yellow
Lines will provide convenient, direct access to the new convention center.
Improvements at a number of stations in Arlington County, Virginia, will enhance
passenger access. Other initiatives will also be advanced, such as work on a new "in-
fiJi" station on the Red Line at New York Avenue in the District of Columbia and a study
Summary
Paae 3
on a transit extension to Tysons Corner and Dulles Airport. These initiatives will ensure
that this region is prepared to meet the transportation challenges that will be posed over
the next twenty-five years.
Reinvestment in existing MetroraH and Metrobus assets remains a critical priority to

ensure the continued reliability of the system. It also represents a significant growth
area in the proposed budget, including a $398 million program to rehabilitate 364 Breda
rail cars, a multi-year $90 million program to overhaul escalators and elevators and a
program to purchase new bus fareboxes that will include SmarTrip capability thereby
enhancing the integration of the bus and rail system for our customers.
The approved operating budget also includes a number of actions that will bring
immediate benefit to the region through added bus and rail service, and customer
service initiatives. Among these actions are the opening of the Branch Avenue
extension of the Metrorail Green Line, new bus routes in the District of Columbia,
Maryland, and Virginia, and marketing initiatives. In addition, the WMATA Board of
Directors has approved the extension of Metro operating hours on weekends to 1:00 AM
and a demonstration further extending hours to 2:00 AM. Also included is an added
emphasis on investments in workforce development through enhanced training and the
implementation of programs to develop critical skills, such as an escalator/elevator
technical apprenticeship program that will move individuals into hard-to-fill areas that are
critical to ensuring the continued reliable operation of the bus and rail system.
The Fiscal 2001 Budget presents many challenges, including the need to adequately
reinvest in system assets, to develop plans for system expansion to meet future needs,
and to invest in human capital. This budget also builds on WMATA's successes. It will
produce clear benefits and a measurable return for the Washington metropolitan area
through added service, improved system reliability, and enhanced opportunities for
future transit system growth.
Summary
Page 4
WMATA Budget
Fiscal 2001 Approved: $1.8 Billion
Where it Comes From
Federal I Other $1,031.2

Revenues $389.6
Gross Subsidy $338.8
Where it Goes
System Improvements Reimbursable Projects
& Expansion $11.7
$229.9
Rail Construction $84.8 Operations
$728.4
Infrastructure
Renewal
$677.3
Debt Service $27.5
$ Millions
Summary
Page 5
FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET
(Dollars in Millions)
REVENUE AND FEDERAL I LOCAL FUNDING
FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001

Budget Budget Budget
OPERATING BUDGET-
Revenue $372.6 $357,1 $389.6
Local Operating Subsidy 280.5 316,2 338.8
$653.1 $673.3 $728.4
Local Debt Service Payment $27.5 $27.5 $27.5
$680,6 $700.8 $755.9
INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-

ISTEA:
Federal Funding $6.5 $6.5 $6.5
Local Assistance 1.6 1,6 1.6
$8.1 $8.1 . $8.1
Section 5307:
Local Assistance 15.4 17.1 19.7
$77,1 $85.4 $98.5
Section 5309:
$25.6 $41.7 $55.8
Additional Local Assistance
(Ramp Up) $0.0 $1.4 $2.2
Line of Credit Financing $0.0 $47.6 $481.3
Repairable Parts Reserve:

Local Assistance $5.0 $5.0 $5.0
Bond Refinancing, IGF and

Reprogrammed Funds $15.5 $43.5 $26.4
$131.3 $232.7 $677.3
RAIL CONSTRUCTION -
103 Mile System:
Federal Funding $5().1 $0.0 $0.0
$80.1 $0.0 $0.0
Construction In Progress $60.6 $140.8 $80.0
$140.7 $140.8 $80.0
89.5 Mile System $16.2 $10.0 $4.8

$156.9 $150.8 $84.8
REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS $11.7
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION $8.0 $57.2 $229.9
TOTAL REVENUE & FUNDING $976.7 $1,141.5 $1,759.6
Note: Reimbursable Projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001.
Summary
Page 6
FISCAL 2001
Budget
BUDGETED RECEIPTS:
Operating Budget
Local Operating Subsidy $338.8 19%
Revenues 389.6 22%
$728.4
Debt Service Payment 27.5 2%
$755.9
Infrastructure Renewal Program

Federal Grants $129.9 7%
Financing 481.3 27%
Local Assistance 39.6 2%
Other 26.5 2%
$677.3
Rail Construction
Federal Funding $0.0 0%
Local Assistance 0.0 0%
Construction In Progress 80.0 5%
89.5 Mile System 4.8 0%
$84.8
Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%
System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%
BUDGETED COSTS:
Operating Budget
Operating Expenses $728.4 41%
Debt Service 27.5 2%
$755.9
Infrastructure Renewal Program 677.3 38%
Rail Construction 84.8 5%
Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%
System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%
TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%
Summary
Page 7
MULTI YEAR BUDGET SUMMARY

Budget Budget Budget
OPERATING BUDGET -
Metrobus $272.6 $274.5 $297.1
Metrorail 367.5 384.5 406.7
Metro Access 13.0 14.3 24.6
$653.1 $673.3 $728.4
DEBT SERVICE - 27.5 27.5 27.5
$680.6 $700.8 $755.9
INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-

Rail Car Rehabilitation $0.0 $0.0 $398.3
Bus Procurements 32.6 19.0 34.3
Bus Preventative Maintenance 10.2 10.2 10.2
Escalator Overhaul & Maintenance 14.7 23.4 6.8
Rail Car Preventative Maintenance 7.8 7.8 10.9
Other Bus and Rail Projects 66.0 172.3 216.8
$131.3 $232.7 $677.3
RAIL CONSTRUCTION -
103 Mile System:
Blue Line $6.2 $0.0 $0.0
Red Line 14.1 7.9 0.3
Inner Green Line 21.1 17.8 5.1
Outer Green Line 99.3 68.9 55.1
Branch Ave. Yard 0.0 7.8 12.6
Rail Cars 0.0 38.4 6.9
$140.7 $140.8 $80.0
89.5 Mile System 16.2 10.0 4.8

$156.9 $150.8 $84.8
REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS 11.7
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION 8.0 57.2 229.9
TOTAL BUDGET $976.7 $1.141.5 $1,759.6
Note: Operating Budget is accrued expenses; IRP and Rail Construction budgets are obligations.
Reimbursable projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001
Summary
Page 8
ORGANIZATION
AND
STAFFING
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Summary -- Organization and Staffing

Page 9
~.
This Page Not Used

Page 10
TABLE OF ORGANIZATION
FISCAL 2001
9,419 POSITIONS
Richard A. White
General Manager
James Gallagher (A)

Deputy General
Manager,
Operations
I I
Harold Bartlett Cheryl Burke Jack Requa Lemuel Proctor (A)
Secretary & General COO COO
Chief of Staff Counsel Bus Operations Rail Operations
James Stewart Fred Goodine

Auditor Chief Safety
General - Officer
Barry McDevitt
Chief,
Metro Transit
Police
I I I I
Peter Benjamin P. Takis Salpeas Gail Charles Leona Agouridis
AGM AGM AGM AGM
Finance & Program Transit System lA.dministrative Services Communications
Development Development

Page 11
FISCAL 2001 APPROVED STAFFING
STAFFING SUMMARY BY OFFICE
FY2000 FY2001 Net

Amended Approved Change
General Manager 2 2 0
Secretary - Chief of Staff 5 6 1
Auditor General 30 27 -3
General Counsel 47 53 6
Safety 26 28 2
Metro Transit Police 406 423 17
Executive Offices 516 539 23
Asst. General Manager - COMP 3 4 1

Accounting 67 70 3
Financial Management 28 27 -1
Treasurer 131 135 4
Risk Management 51 51 0
Business Planning & Development 9 10 1
Property Development & Mgmt 29 27 -2
Business and Financial Planning 2 2. 0
Finance and Program Development 320 326 6
Deputy General Manager - Operations 5 6 1

Infrastructure Renewal Program 14 14 0
Plant Maintenance 773 845 72
Operations Planning and Admin Spt 161 269 108
Americans With Disabilities Act 5 6 1
Operations Support 958 1,140 182
Chief Operating Officer - Rail 3 3 0

Rail Car Maintenance 775 810 35
Rail Transportation 1,084 1,147 63
Rail Systems Maintenance 716 758 42
Track and Structures 323 347 24
Department of Rail Operations 2,901 3,065 164
Chief Operating Officer - Bus 6 6 0

Bus Transportation 2,454 2,526 72
Bus Maintenance 829 873 44
Department of Bus Operations 3,289 3,405 116
Chief Engineer 1 6 5
Operations Engineering 19 58 39
Quality Enhancement and Analysis 29 23 -6
Operations Support 47 40 -7
Chief Engineer 96 127 31
Department of Operations 7,244 7,737 493
Continued Next Page."""

Page 12
FY2000 FY 2001 Net

Amended Approved Change
Asst. General Manager - TSDV 4 5 1

Construction 109 47 -62
Engineering and Architecture 37 43 6
Systems 13 16 3
Major Capital Projects 29 27 -2
Administration - TSDV 25 23 -2
Renovations 33 12 -21
Extensions 42 45 3
Transit Systems Development 292 218 -74
Asst. General Manager - ADMN 27 32 5

Information and Technology Service 113 122 9
Organizational Development 14 14 0
Civil Rights 16 16 0
Procurement and Materials 184 179 -5
Human Resource & Mgmt Planning 50 60 10
Employee and Labor Relations 8 8 0
Administrative Services 412 431 19
AGM - Communications 6 4 -2
Media Relations 5 5 0
Government and Community Relations 5 11 6
Strategic Marketing & Communication 47 64 17
Customer Service 99 84 -15
Communications 162 168 6
Authority Total 8,946 9,419 473

Page 13
Operating Capital
Total Para- Reimb. Reimb Rail Service
Office FTE's Bus Rail transit ~ Capital Constr. .....!BL Expansion
General Manager 2.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00
Secretary - Chief of Staff 6.00 2.37 3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00
Auditor General 27.34 5.40 9.32 0.00 0.00 0.45 9.17 3.00 0.00
General Counsel 52.00 20.26 17.35 0.20 2.14 1.76 6.17 4.12 0.00
Safety 26.17 10.30 12.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 1.70 0.00
Metro Transit Police 423.00 72.94 336.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.60 0.00 0.00
Executive Offices 536.51 112.07 378.98 0.20 2.14 2.21 31.09 9.82 0.00
Asst. General Manager - COMP 4.00 0.62 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.11 2.09 0.00
Accounting 68.41 23.91 28.67 0.38 1.03 2.08 4.19 8.15 0.00
Financial Management 27.00 5.65 10.69 0.39 0.02 1.29 0.87 8.09 0.00
Treasurer 131.16 23.72 101.21 0.62 0.00 0.37 1.18 4.07 0.00
Risk Management 51.00 17.03 32.83 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.68 0.19 0.00
Business Planning & Development 10.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Property Development & Mgmt 26.50 0.88 23.32 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.07 1.08 0.00
Business and Financial Planning 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Finance and Program Development 320.07 71.81 208.84 1.39 2.32 4.95 7.10 23.67 0.00
Deputy General Manager - Operations 6.00 2.70 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00
Infrastructure Renewal Program 14.00· 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00
Plant Maintenance 835.50t 119.21 634.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.10 71.95 0.00
Operations Planning and Admin Spt 269.00 ~ 150.55 117.41 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00
Americans With Disabilities Act 5.83 0.00 0.00 5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Support 1,130.33 272.46 754.75 5.83 1.00 0.00 10.14 86.15 0.00
Chief Operating Officer· Rail 3.00 0.05 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00
Rail Car Maintenance 795.88 1.23 763.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.74 17.10 0.00
Rail Transportation 1,114.43 0.50 1,097.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.42 0.00 0.00
Rail Systems Maintenance 753.57 36.36 682.53 0.00 0.00 0.05 14.07 20.56 0.00
Track and Structures 342.49 0.00 263.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.45 74.30 0.00
Department of Rail Operations 3.009.37 38.14 2,810.49 0.00 0.00 0.05 48.68 112.01 0.00
Chief Operating Officer - Bus 6.00 2.96 0.02 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Bus Transportation 2,349.69 2,254.54 5.17 0.00 85.95 0.00 0.00 4.03 0.00
Bus Maintenance 871.17 819.47 21.02 0.00 30.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Department of Bus Operations 3,226.86 3,076.97 26.21 0.00 119.63 0.00 0.00 4.05 0.00
Chief Engineer 6.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Operations Engineering 58.00 7.45 28.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.36 17.59 0.00
Quality Enhancement and Analysis 23.00 7.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Operations Support 40.00 3.45 29.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.65 0.00
Chief Engineer 127.00 17.90 78.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.36 20.24 0.00
Department of Operations 7,493.56 3,405.47 3,669.95 5.83 120.63 0.05 69.18 222.45 0.00
Continued next page...

Page 14
Operating Capital
Total Para· Reimb. Reimb Rail Service
Office ~ Bys Rail transit ...DRm:.- Capital Constr --lBL Expansion
Asst. General Manager - TSDV 5.00 0.00 0;50 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.50 1.00
Construction 90.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89.82 0.75 0.00
Engineering and Architecture 40.17 0.00 7.32 0.00 0.00 4.16 13.37 1.32 14.00
Systems 16.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 2.85 9.00 1.00
Major Capital Projects 26.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.20 1.05 0.00 0.00
Administration - T$DV 23.91 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 2.28 14.08 2.95 4.00
Renovations 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 11.00 0.00
Extensions 53.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 44.90 0.10 0.00 0.00
Transit Systems Development 267AO 0.00 10.42 0.00 8.50 80.19 122.77 25.52 20.00
Asst. General Manager - ADMN 32.00 12.70 17.36 0.07 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.24 0.00
Infonnation and Technology Service 122.00 39.93 61.90 0.50 0.00 0.00 3.47 15.20 1.00
Organizational Development 14.00 6.20 6.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.85 0.00
Civil Rights 16.00 5.35 6.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 2.92 0.00
Procurement and Materials 179.00 61.03 79.20 0.00 0.00 2.23 20.40 16.14 0.00
Human Resource & Mgmt Planning 60.00 26.64 26.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.00 0.00
Employee and Labor Relations 8.00 3.75 4.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00
Administrative Services 431.00 155.60 202.30 0.57 0.00 2.23 28.75 40.55 1.00
AGM - COmmunications 4.00 1.80 2.10 0.00 Q.1lQ 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00
Media Relations 5.00 2.00 2.88 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00
Government and Community Relations 11.00 1.43 6.49 0.07 0.00 3.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Strategic Marketing & Communication 64.00 20.95 40.85 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.67 1.30 0.00
Customer Service 84.00 43.18 38.77 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Communications 168.00 69.36 91.09 2.21 0.20 3.00 0.70 1.44 0.00
Authority Total 9,216.54 3,814.31 4,561.58 10.20 133.79 92.63 259.59 323.45 21.00

Page 15
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Fiscal 2001 Approved Annual Budget
Staffing by Union Category
Category Position FIE's
Permanent Non Rep TA 884 898.83

Non Rep TS 627 613.56
Local-2 TA 522 552.10
Local-2 TS 93 93.00
Local-922 303 300.00
Local-6S9 6,297 6,247.92
Transit Police 271 271.00
Special Police 65 65.00
9,062 9,041.41
Temporary Non Rep TA & TS 0 0.00

Local-2 TA & TS 0 0.00
0 0.0
Full Time 9,062 9,041.41
Part Time Non Rep TA & TS 0 0.00

Local-2 TA & TS 7 3.50
Local-922 Bus Op 67 33.50
Local-6S9 Bus Op 2S3 13S.24
Local-689 Station Mgr 0 0.00
357 175.24
Total Positions 9,419 9,216.65

Page 16
OPERATING
BUDGET
."
-
.'
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget
Page 17
This Page Not Used
Operating Budget
Page 18
FISCAL 2001 OPERATING BUDGET
The Approved Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget for the Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority totals $728.4 million, or $55.2 million more than the fiscal 2000
budget. The operating budget consists of three service delivery areas, or modes:
Metrobus, Metrorail, and MetroAccess paratransit.
METROBUS
The Metrobus budget totals $297.1 million, of which labor costs are more than 85
percent. Of the remaining costs, the single largest item is the purchase of materials
and supplies for operating and maintaining the bus fleet. Metrobus revenues total
$106.7 million, resulting in a gross operating subsidy of $190.4 million.
METRORAIL
Metrorail operating costs total $406.7 million, excluding $27.5 million in debt service
payments. Like Metrobus, the single largest cost is in labor, 74 percent of the total.
Metrorail requires a significant annual investment in other expenses categories,
specifically for services, materials and supplies to maintain the infrastructure, and in
electric power for rail cars, stations and facilities. Metrorail revenues total $281.6
million, resulting in a gross operating subsidy of $125.2 million, in addition to an
annual debt service payment of $27.5 million.
METROACCESS
MetroAccess is WMATA's paratransit service as mandated by the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. The fiscal 2001 budget totals $24.6 million composed
almost exclusively of contracted services, as all paratransit service is operated under
contract to WMATA. Revenues total $1.3 million. The total jurisdictional payments
for fiscal 2001 are $23.3 million.
Operating Budget
Page 19
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Total 2001 Metrobys Metrorail MetroAccess
REVENUES
Passenger $344,985.0 $91,096.6 $252,542.4 $1,346.0
Other Passenger 3,000.0 2,100.0 900.0 0.0
Parking 9,586.8 0.0 9,586.8 0.0
Charter 1,442.2 1,442.2 0.0 0.0
Advertising 13,886.9 9,304.1 4,582.8 0.0
Joint Development 4,758.4 . 0.0 4,758.4 0.0
Other 11,846.7 2,732.6 9,114.0 0.0
Employee Parking 132.4 66.2 66.2 0.0
Total Revenues $389,638.3 $106,741.7 $281,550.6 $1,346.0
EXPENSES
Personnel $555,374.0 $253.431.1 $301,151.8 $791.2
Services 62,494.7 12,535.6 26.432.0 23,527.1
Materials & Supplies 52,749.3 23,827.0 28,904.3 18.0
Fuel & Propulsion Power 37,712.5 10,050.6 27,661.8 0.1
Utilities 20,828.9 3,933.0 16,892.7 3.3
Casualty & Liability 8,115.2 5,447.7 2,667.5 0.0
Leases & Rentals 3,726.9 1,385.1 2,141.1 200.7
Miscellaneous 6,883.0 4,534.3 2,290.9 57.8
Preventive Maintenance -$19,400.0 -$18,000.0 -$1,400.0 $0.0
Total Expenses $728,484.6 $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2
GROSS SUBSIDY $338,846.3 $190,402.7 $125,191.4 $23,252.2
Gross Subsidy $338,846.3 $190,402.7 $125,191.4 $23,252.2

Less: Audit Adjustment -20,516.0 -4,978.0 -17,548.0 2,010.0
Plus: Debt Service 27.484.2 0.0 27.484.2 0.0
Net Local Subsidy $345,814.5 $185,424.7 $135,127.6 $25,262.2
Cost Recovery Ratio 53.5% 35.9% 69.2% 5.5%
Operating Budget
Page 20
Operating Budget
Fiscal 2001 Approved: $728.4 Million
Where it Comes From

Paratransit $1.3
Rail Revenues $281.6 Bus Revenues $106.7
Where it Goes
Personnel $ 5 55.4
Other $20.1
Fuel/Propulsion $37.7
Materials $52.7
Services $62.5 $ Millions
Operating Budget
Page 21
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· OPERATING
DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT
Ejscal1999 Ejscal2000 Ejscal20Q1 Change
REVENUES
Passenger $332,730.5 $322,940.6 $344,985.0 $22,044.4
Other Passenger 2,728.4 3,000.0 3,000.0 0.0
Parking 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1
Charter 2,101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 -19.1
Advertising 10,077.2 8,578.0 13,886.9 5,308.9
Joint Development 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9
Other 10,626.9 7,975.6 11,846.7 3,871.1
Total Revenues $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 $32,563.2
EXPENSES
Personnel $491,010.6 $523,525.3 $555,374.0 $31,848.7
Services 49,905.3 46,557.1 62,494.7 15,937.6
Materials & Supplies 48,308.8 53,845.9 52,749.3 -1,096.6
Fuel & Propulsion Power 33,944.8 38,260.9 37,712.5 -548.4
Utilities 18,613.0 20,468.3 20,828.9 360.6
Casualty & Liability 9,064.2 8,148.2 8,115.2 -33.0
Leases & Rentals 2,641.8 3,365.0 3,726.9 361.9
Miscellaneous -443.8 93.0 6,883.0 6,790.0
Preventive Maintenance * -21,000.0 -19,400.0 1,600.0
Total Expenses $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 $55,220.9
GROSS SUBSIDY $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 $22,657.7
Gross Subsidy $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 $22,657.7

Less: Audit Adjustment 14,683.1 -11,453.0 -20,516.0 -9,063.0
Plus: Debt Service Cost 27,484.2 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0
Cost Recovery Ratio 57.1 % 53.0% 53.5% 0.45%
"Preventative Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above
Operating Budget
Page 22
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES
DISPLAYED BY MODE
Fjscal1999 Fiscal 2000 Ejscal2oo1 Change
REVENUES
Bus Operations $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 -$10,838.2
Rail Operations 273,629.4 260,633.1 281,550.6 -20,917.5
Paratransit 406.0 538.5 1,346.0 -807.5
TOTAL REVENUES $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 -$32,563.2
EXPENSES·
Bus Operations $272,575.9 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 -$22,691.3
Rail Operations 367,470.3 384,466.4 406,742.0 -22,275.6
Paratransit 12,998.4 14,344.2 24,598.2 -10,254.0
TOTAL EXPENSES $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 -$55,220.9
GROSS SUBSIDY $280,460.1 $316,188.6 $338,846.3 -$22,657.7
Gross Subsidy $280,460.10 $316,188.60 $338,846.30 -$22,657.70

Less: Audit Service 14,683.10 -11,453.00 -20,516.00 -9,063.00
Plus: Debt Service Cost 27,484.2 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0
Net Local Subsidy $322,627.4 $332,219.8 $345,814.5 -$31,720.7
Cost Recovery Ratio 57.1% 53.0% 53.5% 0.40/0
Operating Budget
Page 23
OPERATING EXPENSE BY OFFICE
FY 1999 FY2000 FY 2001 Change

General Manager 584.9 497.4 520.7 23.3
Secretary - Chief of Staff 478.6 620.9 821.2 200.3
General Counsel 3,371.2 3,821.1 3,816.0 -5.1
Auditor General 1,195.4 1,239.8 1.168.1 -71.7
Safety 1,657.6 2,425.9 2,363.0 -62.9
Metro Transit Police 26.838.7 28,552.9 29.533.7 980.8
Executive Offices $34,126.4 $37.158.0 $38,222.6 $1,064.6
Asst. General Manager - COMP 202.3 208.5 334.0 125.5
Accounting 3,087.1 3.688.0 3,556.4 -131.7
Financial Management 1,368.3 1,983.9 2,453.0 469.1
Treasurer 7,280.8 8,134.5 10,105.1 1,970.6
Risk Management 23,005.8 19,919.3 20.252.3 333.0
Business Planning & Development 1.284.3 2,094.5 2.274.0 179.5
Property Development & Mgmt 4,203.5 5.008.1 5,307.1 299.0
Business and Financial Planning 0.0 188.0 140.7 -47.3
Finance & Program Development $40,432.1 $41.224.9 544,422.7 $3.197.8
Deputy General Manager - Operations 494.8 993.4 583.5 -409.8
Plant Maintenance 53,719.7 . 52,356.7 63,393.1 11,036.5
Operations Planning and Administrative Support 9,613.0 10,773.9 12,937.8 2,164.0
Americans With Disabilities Act 12.792.4 14,096.2 24,193.0 10,096.8
Operations $76.620.0 $78,220.1 $101.107.5 $22,887.4
Chief Operating Officer - Bus 223.3 295.7 314.8 19.1
Bus Transportation 136,091.4 144,578.7 155,688.2 11,109.5
Bus Maintenance 63,181.8 78,340.9 83,375.0 5,034.1
Bus Service $199,496.5 $223.215.4 $239,378.0 $16.162.7
Chief Operating Officer - Rail 238.7 295.0 328.1 33.1
Rail Car Maintenance 53.095.9 58,760.3 58,333.7 -426.6
Rail Transportation 73,068.1 75,683.8 78,347.8 2,664.0
Rail Systems Maintenance 93,697.7 50,673.6 56,235.9 5,562.2
Track and Structures 15,983.9 19,764.5 18.338.4 -1,426.1
Rail Service $236,084.2 $205,177.1 $211.583.8
Office of the Chief Engineer 0.0 0.0 502.3 502.3
Operations Engineering 8,513.3 5,903.0 5,767.7 -135.3
Quality Enhancement and Analysis 0.0 2,421.5 1,633.0 -788.5
Operations Support 0.0 49.251.3 48.343.3 -908.0
Chief Engineer $8,513.3 $57.575.8 $56,246.3 -$1.329.5
Asst. General Manager - TSDV 49.8 8.6 63.8 55.2
Construction 303.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Engineering and Architecture 662.8 304.2 487.6 183.4
Systems 555.9 173.4 332.9 159.5
Major Capital Projects 593.8 2.0 0.0 -2.0
Administration - TSDV 145.8 40.8 58.7 17.9
Renovations 0.0 456.1 0.0 -456.1
Transit System Development $2,311.3 $985.1 $943.0 -$42.1
Asst. General Manager - ADMN 3.329.3 4.288.7 4,304.4 15.7
Information and Technology Service 10,897.9 13,214.0 14,822.5 1.608.5
Procurement and Materials 9,763.1 10,839.4 10,720.6 -118.9
Human Resource & Mgmt Planning 6,833.0 7,190.4 5,950.6 -1,239.8
Employee and Labor Relations 1,040.0 1,110.5 1,215.9 105.4
Civil Rights 1,035.3 1,083.6 1.109.6 26.0
Organizational Development 0.0 0.0 3,000.8 3,000.8
Administrative Services $32,898.5 $37,726.6 $41.124.3 $3,397.7
Media Relations 468.2 531.9 647.0 115.1
Govemment and Community Relations 596.4 608.2 1.024.6 416.4
AGM - Communications 626.0 1,008.0 645.5 -362.5
Customer Service 4.883.8 5,789.5 5,099.3 -690.2
Strategic Marketing and Communication 3.871.7 5.043.2 7,440.0 2.396.8
Communications $10,446.1 $12,980.8 $14,856.3 $1,875.5
Less: Preventive Maintenance -$21,000.0 -$19,400.0 $1,600.0
TOTAL COST $640,928.4 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 $55,220.9
• Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above
Operating Budget
Page 24
FISCAL 2001 DISTRIBUTION BY MODE AND OFFICE
Bus Rail Paratransit Operating
General Manager 241.1 279.6 0.0 520.7

Secretary - Chief of Staff 375.8 445.3 0.0 821.2
General Counsel 1.871.3 1,923.2 21.4 3,816.0
Auditor General 435.7 732.4 0.0 1,168.1
Safety 966.1 1,396.9 0.0 2,363.0
Metro Transit Police 5,073.7 24.460.0 0.0 29,533.7
Executive Offices $8,963.7 $29,237.5 $21.4 $38,222.6
Asst. General Manager - COMP 198.2 135.7 0.0 334.0
Accounting 1,574.4 1.952.2 29.8 3,556.4
Financial Management 1,008.2 1,410.6 34.3 2,453.0
Treasurer 1,596.4 8.466.3 42.4 10,105.1
Risk Management 11,363.6 8,888.7 0.0 20.252.3
Business Planning & Development 0.0 2,274.0 0.0 2,274.0
Property Development & Mgmt 79.9 5,227.2 0.0 5,307.1
Business and Financial Planning 3.0 137.7 0.0 140.7
Finance & Program Development $15,823.6 $28,492.6 $106.4 $44,422.7
Deputy General Manager· Operation 236.3 347.2 0.0 583.5
Plant Maintenance 11,081.2 52.311.9 0.0 63,393.1
Operations Planning and Administrati 7,254.4 5.683.4 0.0 12,937.8
Americans With Disabilities Act 0.0 0.0 24,193.0 24,193.0
Infrastructure Renewel Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Operations $18,572.0 $58,342.5 $24,193.0 $101,107.5
Chief Operating Officer - Bus 311.8 3.0 0.0 314.8
Bus Transportation 155,172.0 516.3 0.0 155,688.2
Bus Maintenance 80.400.2 2,974.7 0.0 83,375.0
Bus Service $235,884.0 $3,494.0 $0.0 $239,378.0
Chief Operating Officer - Rail 7.5 320.7 0.0 328.1
Rail car Maintenance 52.0 58,281.7 0.0 58.333.7
Rail Transportation 32.1 78,315.7 0.0 78.347.8
Rail Systems Maintenance 3,772.1 52,460.4 3.3 56.235.9
Track and Structures 115.0 18,223.4 0.0 18.338.4
Rail Service $3,978.7 $207,601.9 $3.3 $211,583.8
Office of the Chief Engineer 0.5 501.8 0.0 502.3
Operations Engineering 2,764.2 3,003.5 0.0 5,767.7
Quality Enhancement and Analysis 545.9 1,087.1 0.0 1,633.0
Operations Support 2,863.7 45,479.5 0.0 48,343.3
Chief Engineer $6.174.4 $50,071.9 $0.0 $56,246.3
Asst. General Manager - TSDV 0.0 63.8 0.0 63.8
Construction 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Engineering and Architecture 0.0 487.6 0.0 487.6
Systems 0.0 332.9 0.0 332.9
Major Capital Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Administration - TSDV 0.0 58.7 0.0 58.7
Renovations 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Extensions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Transit System Development $0.0 $943.0 $0.0 $943.0
Asst. General Manager - ADMN 1,547.1 2,713.3 44.0 4,304.4
Information and Technology Service 6,498.8 8,274.0 49.7 14,822.5
Procurement and Materials 4,612.5 6,097.5 10.6 10,720.6
Human Resource & Mgmt Planning 3,137.6 2,813.1 0.0 5,950.6
Employee and Labor Relations 597.2 618.7 0.0 1,215.9
Civil Rights 503.6 606.0 0.0 1,109.6
Organizational Development 1.663.0 1.337.7 0.0 3.000.8
Administrative Services $18,559.8 $22,460.2 $104.3 $41.124.3
Media Relations 283.9 357.8 5.3 647.0
Govemment and Community Relatior 195.1 824.1 5.4 1.024.6
AGM - Communications 308.4 337.1 0.0 645.5
Customer Service 2,582.4 2.391.0 125.9 5,099.3
Strategic Marketing and Communicat 3.818.5 3,588.4 33.1 7,440.0
Communications $7,188.2 $7,498.4 $169.7 $14,856.3
Less: Preventive Maintenance -18.000.0 -1,400.0 0.0 -19,400.0
TOTAL COST $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2 $728,484.6
Operating Budget
Page 25
FISCAL 2001 OPERATING MODAL DISTRIBUTION
Total Bus Rail Paratransit

Full-Time Salaries 118,300.3 38,057.2 79,566.9 676.2
Temporary Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Part Time Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Salary Lapse -6,748.0 -2,388.0 -4,316.4 -43.6
Overtime Salaries 4,777.4 990.9 3,786.2 0.2
Salaries (Total) $116,329.7 $36,660.2 $79,036.7 $632.8
Operator Wages 164,484.7 114,868.3 49,616.4 0.0
Full Time Wages 158,007.7 49,579.9 108,422.5 5.3
Part Time Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Temporary Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wage Lapse -6,598.7 -2,119.6 -4,479.0 -0.1
Overtime Wages 11,700.5 3,988.6 7,711.5 0.4
Wages (Total) $327,594.2 $166,317.2 $161,271.4 $5.6
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $443,923.9 $202,977.4 $240,308.1 $638.4
Fringe Benefits 102,536.9 46,062.7 56,321.5 152.8
Other Fringe Benefits 3,355.3 1,589.3 1,766.0 0.0
Workers Compensation 5,557.9 2,801.7 2,756.2 0.0
Fringes (Total) $111,450.1 $50,453.7 $60,843.7 $152.8
TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $555,374.0 $253,431.1 $301,151.8 $791.2
Management Fee 2,638.5 0.0 2,638.5 0.0

Professional & Technical 13,320.1 5,528.5 7,700.6 91.0
Temporary Help 1,108.2 239.2 833.6 35.3
Contract Maintenance 14,925.3 3,399.5 11,502.0 23.7
Custodial Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Paratransit 23,273.2 0.0 0.0 23,273.2
Other 7,229.6 3,368.4 3,757.3 103.9
Services (Total) $62,494.7 $12,535.6 $26,432.0 $23,527.1
Fuel and Lubricants 1,537.6 905.6 632.0 0.0
Tires 1,844.9 1,770.3 74.6 0.0
Other 49,366.8 21,151.2 28,197.7 18.0
Materials & Supplies (Total) $52,749.3 $23,827.0 $28,904.3 $18.0
Diesel Fuel 10,407.0 10,311.5 95.4 0.1
Propulsion Power 27,305.5 -260.9 27,566.4 0.0
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $37,712.5 $10,050.6 $27,661.8 $0.1
Electricity and Gas 17,089.5 2,505.7 14,583.8 0.0
Utilities - Other 3,739.4 1,427.3 2,308.9 3.3
Utilities (Total) $20,828.9 $3,933.0 $16,892.7 $3.3
Insurance 2,296.7 1,066.7 1,230.0 0.0
Claims 5,818.6 4,381.1 1,437.5 0.0
Casualty & Liability (Total) $8,115.2 $5,447.7 $2,667.5 $0.0
Property 1,108.8 654.2 254.6 200.0
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equipment 2,618.1 730.9 1,886.5 0.7
Leases (Total) $3,726.9 $1,385.1 $2,141.1 $200.7
Dues And Subscriptions 382.6 159.5 221.7 1.4
Conferences and Meetings 220.8 78.5 129.0 13.3
Business Travel/Public Hrg 351.0 109.8 239.2 2.0
Interview & Relocation 1,056.9 457.0 600.0 0.0
Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 2,114.4 1',071.4 1,043.0 0.0
Other 5,591.1 2,733.2 2,816.8 41.1
Miscellaneous (Total) $9,716.8 $4,609.3 $5,049.6 $57.8
Reimbursements -2,833.8 -75.0 -2,758.8 0.0
Reimbursements (Total) -$2,833.8 -$75.0 -$2,758.8 0.0
TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST $192,510.6 $61,713.4 $106,990.2 $23,807.0
Less: Preventive Maintenance -19,400.0 -18,000.0 -1,400.0 0.0
TOTAL OPERATING COST $728,484.6 $297,144.4 $406,742.0 $24,598.2
Operating Budget
Page 26
THREE YEAR OPERATING COST COMPARISON
Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Change
Full-Time Salaries 84,967.4 106,850.2 118,300.3 11,450.1

Temporary Salaries 634.7 143.8 0.0 -143.8
Part Time Salaries 127.0 36.2 0.0 -36.2
Salary Lapse 0.0 -2,643.6 -6,748.0 -4,104.4
Overtime Salaries 5,815.4 3,840.5 4,777.4 936.9
Salaries (Total) $91,544.5 $108,227.1 $116,329.7 $8,102.6
Operator Wages 156,237.0 150,958.6 164,484.7 13,526.1
Full Time Wages 123,896.8 149,154.4 158,007.7 8,853.3
Wage Lapse 0.0 -1,983.2 -6,598.7 -4,615.5
Overtime Wages 15,737.0 4,576.1 11,700.5 7,124.4
Wages (Total) $295,870.7 $302,705.9 $327,594.2 $24,888.3
TOTAL SAlARIES AND WAGES $387,415.2 $410,933.0 $443,923.9 $32,990.9
Fringe Benefits 93,102.4 103,343.0 102,536.9 -806.0
Workers Compensation 7,481.0 5,912.4 5,557.9 -354.5
Fringes (Total) $103,595.5 $112,592.3 $111,450.1 -$1,142.1
TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $491,010.6 $523,525.3 $555,374.0 $31,848.7

Management Fee 2,194.2 2,638.5 2,638.5 0.0
Professional & Technical 22,256.6 11,052.5 13,320.1 2,267.6
Temporary Help 1,027.7 978.4 1,108.2 129.8
Contract Maintenance 7,630.9 12,544.1 14,925.3 2,381.2
Paratransit 12,400.2 13,384.0 23,273.2 9,889.2
Other 4,395.7 5,959.6 7,229.6 1,270.0
Services (Total) $49,905.3 $46,557.1 $62,494.7 $15,937.6
Fuel and Lubricants 1,003.6 1,465.6 1,537.6 72.0
Tires 2,143.6 1,794.3 1,844.9 50.6
Other 45,161.6 50,586.0 49,366.8 -1,219.2
Materials & Supplies (Total) $48,308.8 $53,845.9 $52,749.3 -$1,096.6
Diesel Fuel 6,950.3 8,461.1 10,407.0 1,945.9
Propulsion Power 26,994.5 29,799.8 27,305.5 -2,494.3
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $33,944.8 $38,260.9 $37.712.5 -$548.4
Electricity and Gas 15.120.8 16,801.7 17,089.5 287.8
Utilities - Other 3.492.2 3,666.6 3,739.4 72.8
Utilities (Total) $18,613.0 $20,468.3 $20,828.9 $360.6
Insurance 1,887.2 2,398.2 2,296.7 -101.5
Claims 7,177.0 5,750.0 5,818.6 68.6
Casualty & Liability (Total) $9,064.2 $8,148.2 $8,115.2 -$33.0
Property 728.9 587.4 1,108.8 521.4
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equipment 1,912.8 2,777.6 2,618.1 -159.5
Leases (Total) $2,641.8 $3,365.0 $3,726.9 $361.9
Interview & Relocation 795.9 595.5 1,056.9 461.4
Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 1,051.6 1,113.9 2,114.4 1,000.5
Other 389.7 505.3 5,591.1 5,085.8
Miscellaneous (Total) $2,878.9 $2,910.6 $9,716.8 $6,806.2
Reimbursements (Total) -$3,322.7 -$2,817.6 -$2.833.8 -$16.2
Reimbursements -3,322.7 -2,817.6 -2,833.8 -16.2
."
Less Preventive Maintenance -21,000.0 -19,400.0 1.600.0
TOTAL OPERATING COST $653,044.6 $673,263.7 $728,484.6 $55,220.9
·Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above
Operating Budget
Page 27
This Page Not Used
Operating Budget
Pag.e 28
RIDERSHIP
AND
REVENUE
FISCAL 200 1 BUDGET
Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenue

Page 29
r:
This Page Not Used

Page 30
FISCAL 2001 REVENUES
Total operating revenues for fiscal 2001 are projected at $389.6 million, comprised
of $345.0 million in passenger revenue and $44.6 million in other revenue. The fiscal
2001 revenues are $32.6 million higher than the approved fiscal 2000 budget, with
passenger revenues increasing by $22.0 million and non-passenger revenues increasing
by$10.5 million.
I. PASSENGER REVENUES
Metrorail passenger revenues for fiscal 2001, net of revenue integration, are projected
at $252.5 million, $14.5 million over the approved fiscal 2000 budget. A large part
of the increase reflects continued ridership growth associated with strong economic
development, opening of new Inner Green Line stations and increased tourism.
System changes in fiscal 2001 include the January 2001 opening of the five Outer
Green Line Stations to Branch Avenue and the February 2001 opening of a new garage
at the Vienna Metrorail Station. The increase in new rail trips generated by the Branch
Avenue segment is projected at 22,000 daily trips, 18,000 new trips and 4,000
diversions from existing stations. The Vienna garage will provide approximately 2,200
parking spaces and is expected to provide a net increase of over 2,000 daily trips.
Metrobus passenger revenues, net of revenue integration, for fiscal 2001 are projected
at $91.1 million, $6.7 million higher than the approved fiscal 2000 budget. Ridership
growth and the addition of new service to address overcrowding on some routes will
add bus passenger revenue. A decrease in bus ridership along the Branch Avenue
Corridor is projected due to the diversion of riders to the five new Metrorail stations.
The fiscal 2001 approved budget continues the Board approved integration of rail and
bus passenger revenues initiated in fiscal 2000 as a result of the fare simplification
program. In the fiscal 2000 budget, $4.9 million in passenger revenues were
transferred from rail to bus to share the discount between the two modes. Also, fare
integration had resulted in $3.8 million being transferred from Metrorail to Metrobus
passenger revenue. The fiscal 2001 budget will transfer an additional $4.9 million
from Metrorail to Metrobus passenger revenue.
Total Metrorail and Metrobus ridership during fiscal 2001 is expected to reach 166.0
million and 141.1 million trips respectively. This is 6.8 percent higher than the
combined rail and bus ridership budgeted for fiscal 2000.

Page 31
Passenger revenues
(In thousands)
METRORAIL METROBUS PARATRANSIT
Approved Fiscal 2000 Base Revenue $238,039.7 $84,362.4 $538.5
Adjustment to Base 11,799.8 896.6 29.8

Fiscal 2001 Service
Annualize Inner Green Line 936.0
Growth 2,498.4 227.6 777.7
Branch Avenue (January 2001) 3,700.5 (160.0)
Vienna Garage (February 2001) ·468.0
Guidance Based Bus Service 670.0
Fiscal 2001 New Bus Service 200.0
Revenue Integration (4,900.0) 4,900.0
Fiscal 2001 Approved Passenger Revenues $252.542.4 $91 ,096.6 $1 .346.0
Ridership 166,002.0 141,142.0 782.9
II. OTHER PASSENGER REVENUE - SCHOOL SUBSIDY
The fiscal 2001 school subsidy reimbursement from the District of Columbia is $0.9
million for rail and $2.1 million for bus, the same as the budgeted amount for fiscal
2000. The District of Columbia subsidizes school student fares when District school
students use Metrorail and/or Metrobus to attend school and school related activities.
The District students, when using Metrorail and/or Metrobus, pay $0.55 or one-half
the Metrobus base fare of $1.10. The students pay the $0.55 fare using a special
farecard on Metrorail or a special token or ticket on Metrobus. With the student
paying one-half the base bus fare or $0.55 per trip, the District of Columbia reimburses
the Authority $0.55 for each student trip on Metrobus. On Metrorail, the District
reimburses the Authority for the difference between the $0.55 paid by the students
and the full regular fare for the trips made by the students.
III. PARKING
Parking revenues at rail stations are $9.6 million in fiscal 2001, or $0.7 million over
the fiscal 2000 budget. The increase is primary attributable to the opening of the
Branch Avenue extension. The total fiscal 2001 available parking spaces include
45,305 daily spaces, 2,458 metered spaces, and 1,365 monthly permit spaces for a
total of 49, 128 spaces.

Page 32
IV. ADVERTISING
Advertising revenue in fiscal 2001 is estimated at $13.9 million, $4.6 million for rail
and $9.3 million for bus. The increases over fiscal 2000 of $1.7 million in the rail
mode and $3.6 million in the bus mode reflect an increase in the annual guaranteed
revenues provided in the advertising contracts between the Authority and the sales
contractor and a multi-year advertising contract awarded to the Authority.
V. JOINT DEVELOPMENT
Joint development revenue is comprised of long-term leases of WMATA property and

air rights for property adjacent to the rail stations. The fiscal 2001 joint development
revenue, credited to the rail mode, of $4.8 million is $0.6 million more than the fiscal
2000 budget. The increase results from additional lease arrangements.
VI. CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT SERVICE
Contract bus service is provided to member jurisdictions at an amount equal to

operating costs plus a portion of overhead costs, while subcontract bus service is at
a per hour premium rate to generate a profit. Subcontract bus service is provided to
any able and available organization engaged in surface transportation that either: 1)
lacks the capacity; or 2) lacks the equipment to perform the requested service. The
fiscal 2001 budget assumes the continued operation of limited peak period service, in
addition to the service provided in the off-peak period. The combined revenue for
contract and subcontract bus services for fiscal 2001 is $1.4 million, which is $0.1
million under the fiscal 2000 budget. This decrease is due to reduction~ in the
contract service to the Lorton facility.
VII. OTHER REVENUES
Other revenues included in the fiscal 2001 budget are from: vending machines; pay
telephones; cellular telephones; bike programs; fiber optics; and miscellaneous
revenues, such as subrogation collections, scrap metal and surplus property sales. The
fiscal 2001 revenues of $8.9 million are $3.0 million higher than fiscal 2000. The
increase is attributed to the lease of extended and new fiber optic cable contracts.
VIII. INVESTMENT INCOME
The fiscal 2001 budget of $2.9 million is based on an adjusted average monthly
investment portfolio of 58.3 million at an earning rate of 5.00 percent. Investment
income is allocated to the rail and bus modes using the subsidy distribution from the
fiscal 2000 budget.

Page 33
IX. JGB PARKING FACILITY
In fiscal 2001, revenues from the JGB parking facility are $132,400 and are allocated
equally between the rail and bus modes. This amount is equivalent to the previous
year and includes 28 spaces at a monthly rate of $120 per space; 70 spaces at a
monthly rate of $110 per space; and four spaces at a monthly rate of $40 per space,
adjusted for an average of three spaces which may be vacant during the year due to
transitions.

Page 34
, ~ .

FISCAL 1998 THROUGH FISCAL 2001
0 REVENUE COMPARISON
"C (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
..,
CD
m
r-+ Change
::l From
ce
Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2000
OJ
c Actual Actual Approved Approved Approved
a.
<0
(t) BUS MODE
,.-to
Passenger Revenue (includes revenue integration) $83,845.5 $85,145.2 $84.362.4 $91,096.6 $6,734.2
Other Passenger - School Subsidy 1,740.1 1.916.1 2,100.0 2.100.0 $0.0
:D Contract/Subcontract 1,735.8 2.101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 ($19.1)
c:
..,
CD
Advertising 5,392.6 6,192.5 5.720.0 9.281.9 $3,561.9
rn
::r Advertising on Timetables 11.5 0.9 17.8 22.2 $4.4
-c Total Advertising 5,404.1 6,193.3 5,737.8 9.304.1 $3.566.3
Q)
::J 927.6 947.3 841.7 867.9 $26.2
c. Miscellaneous Revenues
::n
CD Interest 1,867.5 2.186.7 1,334.1 1,864.7 $530.6
<
CD
Employee Parking 53.1 59.4 66.2 66.2 $0.0
::J
c Total Bus Mode Revenues $95,573.7 $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 $10,838.2
(D
RAIL MODE
Passenger Revenue $241.227.1 $247,179.3 $238,039.7 $252,542.4 $14,502.7
Other Passenger - Schoof Subsidy 901.9 812.3 900.0 900.0 $0.0
Parking 8,572.3 9,289.0 8,856.7 9.586.8 $730.1
Advertising 2,569.9 3.859.0 2.782.4 4,510.8 $1,728.4

Advertising on Timetabfe 17.1 24.8 57.8 72.0 $14.2
Total Advertising 2.587.0 3,883.8 2,840.2 4,582.8 $1,742.6
Joint Development 4,428.9 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 $627.9
Fiber Optics 2,056.3 4,114.7 4.163.1 7,200.0 $3,036.9

Miscellaneous Revenues 1,469.6 1,709.6 886.2 865.1 ($21.1)
Total Other Revenues 3,526.0 5.824.2 5,049.3 8,065.1 $3,015.8
Interest 729.0 1,668.6 750.5 1,048.9 $298.4

"U Employee Parking 53.1 59.4 66.2 66.2 $0.0
w
(C
CD Total Rail Mode Revenues $262,025.3 $273,629.4 $260,633.1 $281,550.6 $20,917.5
W
01
Continued Next Page...
FISCAL 1998 THROUGH FISCAL 2001
REVENUE COMPARISON
-cO
Q)-c (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
COco
en """l
W~ Change
0) S' From
(C
Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2000
tD Actual Actual Approved Approved Approved
c
a.
ce
CD PARATRANSIT MODE
.-+
Paratransit Passenger Revenue $383.8 $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5

:D
c.:
CD Total Paratransit Mode Revenue $383.8 $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5
"""l
en
::r
"0
Q)
REVENUE COMPARISON SUMMARY
::J
a. Passenger Revenue $325,456.5 $332,730.5 $322,940.6 $344,985.0 $22 044.4
1
:c Other Passenger - School Subsidy 2,641.9 2,728.4 3,000.0 3,000.0 0.0

CD
<
CD
Contract/Subcontract 1,735.8 2,101.0 1,461.3 1,442.2 (19.1)
::J Parking 8,572.3 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1
c:
(1)
Advertising 7,962.5 10,051.5 8,502.4 13,792.7 5,290.3
Advertising on Timetable 28.6 25.7 75.6 94.2 18.6
Total Advertising 7,991.2 10,077.2 8,578.0 13,886.9 5,308.9
Joint Development 4,428.9 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9
Fiber Optics 2.056.3 4,114.7 4.163.1 7,200.0 3,036.9

Miscellaneous Revenues 2,397.3 2,656.9 1,727.9 1,733.0 5.1
Total Other Revenues 4,453.6 6.771.6 5,891.0 8,933.0 3,042.0
Interest 2,596.5 3,855.3 2,084.6 2,913.7 829.1

Employee Parking 106.3 118.9 132.4 132.4 0.0
Total Revenues $357,982.8 $372,584.5 $357,075.1 $389,638.3 $32,563.2

o
"C
CD
.....
Q) RIDERSHIP BY SERVICE
~.
::s FOR FISCAL YEARS 1994-THROUGH 2001
eo
OJ (in thousands)
c:
C-
eo
CD
r-+
::JJ
a:
...,
CD
en Fiscal 1994 Fiscal 1995 Fiscal 1996 Fiscal 1997 Fiscal 1998 Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001
':3"
u Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Approved
Q)
:I Metrobus Ridership Trips 147,854.8 140,168.6 118,750.9 117,865.8 120,827.7 124,530.9 138,481.0 141 142.0
t
a.
:XI Metrorail Ridership Trips 149,731.0 153,640.0 145,738.0 148,040.0 156,192.0 157,220.0 163,275.0 166,002.0
CD
<
CD
::J Total 297,585.8 293,808.6 264,488.9 265,905.8 277,019.7 281,750.9 301,756.0 307,144.0
C
CD
Note - Bus ridership has been restated to report unlinked trips. With fare simplification and fare integration, a comparison of bus ridership can only
be made by reporting total boardings. Total boardings include cash, bus transfer, rail transfer, and pass riders. Previously, bus transfers were not
included in order to record each rider only once. The implementation of fare simplification provides a regional bus transfer program regional One
Day pass (sold and accepted by all local bus systems) and a flash pass program recognized and accepted by all local bus systems.
This Page Not, Used

Page 38
METROBUS
• REVENUE
• EXPENSE
• STATISTICS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget -- Metrobus

Page 39
This Page Not Used
~.

Page 40
Bus Service
Where it Comes From
Revenues $106.7
Where it Goes
Fuel $10.1
Personnel $253.4
$ Millions

Page 41
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - METROBUS
Fjscal1999 Fjscal2000 Fjscal2001 Change
REVENUES
Passenger $85,145.2 $84.362.4 $91,096.6 $6,734.2
Other Passenger 1.916.1 2.100.0 2.100.0 0.0
Charter 2.101.0 1.461.3 1,442.2 -19.1
Advertising 6,193.3 5,737.8 9,304.1 3,566.3
Other 3,134.0 2,175.8 2,732.6 556.8
Total Revenues $98,549.1 $95,903.5 $106,741.7 $10,838.2
EXPENSES
Personnel $217,873.8 $238,596.1 $253,431.1 $14,834.9
Services 15,394.2 11,044.0 12,535.6 1,491.6
Materials & Supplies 19,777.1 22,677.6 23,827.0 1,149.4
Fuel & Propulsion Power 6,946.6 8,410.1 10,050.6 1,640.5
Utilities 3.509.8 3,886.2 3,933.0 46.8
Casualty & Liability 6,574.1 5,416.1 5,447.7 31.6
Leases & Rentals 1,511.4 1,335.7 1,385.1 49.4
Miscellaneous 988.9 1,087.3 4.534.3 3,447.0
Preventive Maintenance * -18,000.0 -18,000.0 0.0
Total Expenses $272,575.9 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 $22,691.3
GROSS SUBSIDY $174,026.8 $178,549.6 $190,402.7 $11,853.1
Gross Subsidy $174,026.8 $178,875.6 $195,380.7 $16,505.1

Less: Audit Adjustment 0.0 -326.0 -4,978.0 -4,652.0
Cost Recovery Ratio 36.2% 34.90/0 35.90/0 1.00/0
*Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above
Operating Budget -- Metrobus Financial Tables

Page 42
METROBUS BUDGET SUMMARY
Full-Time Salaries 27,010.4 32,651.7 38,057.2 5,405.5

Part Time Salaries 73.3 20.8 0.0 -20.8
Salary Lapse 0.0 -344.7 -2,388.0 -2,043.3
Overtime Salaries 719.8 733.5 990.9 257.4
Salaries (Total) $27,941.9 $33,139.8 $36,660.2 $3,520.4
Operator Wages 102,147.2 102,780.8 114,868.3 12,087.5
Full Time Wages 37,918.0 49,958.6 49,579.9 -378.7
Wage Lapse 0.0 -381.8 -2,119.6 -1,737.8
Overtime Wages 3,640.3 1,860.8 3,988.6 2,127.8
Wages (Total) $143,705.5 $154,218.4 $166,317.2 $12,098.8
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $171,647.4 $187,358.2 $202,977.4 $15,619.2
Fringe Benefits 41.177.5 46,653.2 46,062.7 -590.6
Other Fringe Benefits 1.682.5 1,628.5 1,589.3 -39.2
Fringes (Total) $46,226.4 $51,237.9 $50,453.7 -$784.3
Management Fee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Professional & Technical 9,964.1 3,918.9 5,528.5 1,609.6
Temporary Help 453.8 249.5 239.2 -10.3
Contract Maintenance 2,491.1 3.241.9 3,399.5 157.6
Paratransit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 2,485.3 3,633.7 3,368.4 -265.3
Services (Total) $15,394.2 $11,044.0 $12,535.6 $1,491.6
Fuel and Lubricants 683.6 934.3 905.6 -28.7
Tires 2,090.6 1,727.3 1,770.3 43.0
Other 17.002.9 20,016.0 21,151.2 1,135.2
Materials & Supplies (Total) $19,777.1 $22,677.6 $23,827.0 $1,149.4
Diesel Fuel 6,946.6 8.410.1 10,311.5 1,901.4
Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 -260.9 -260.9
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $6,946.6 $8,410.1 $10,050.6 $1,640.5
Electricity and Gas 2.236.0 2,507.4 2,505.7 -1.7
Utilities - Other 1,273.8 1,378.8 1,427.3 48.5
Utilities (Total) $3,509.8 $3,886.2 $3,933.0 $46.8
Insurance 994.4 1,103.6 1,066.7 -36.9
Claims 5,579.7 4,312.5 4,381.1 68.6
Casualty & Uability (Total) $6,574.1 $5,416.1 $5,447.7 $31.6
Property 661.6 512.0 654.2 142.2
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equipment 849.8 823.7 730.9 -92.8
Leases (Total) $1,511.4 $1,335.7 $1,385.1 $49.4
Business TraveVPublic Hrg 72.3 72.7 109.8 37.1
Interview & Relocation 361.3 222.6 457.0 234.4
Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 502.6 518.4 1,071.4 553.0
Other 210.0 180.7 2,733.2 2,552.5
Reimbursements -308.6 -75.0 -75.0 0.0
Reimbursements (Total) -$308.6 -$75.0 -$75.0 $0.0
Less Preventive Maintenance -18,000.0 -18,000.0
TOTAL METROBUS COST $269,066.1 $274,453.1 $297,144.4 $22,691.3
9Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Page 43
FISCAL 2001
BUS SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS
• 250 Weekdays, 58 Saturdays, 57 Sundays.
• Saturday Schedule - Holiday - July 4th , Columbus Day, Veteran's Day,

Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day
• Sunday Schedule - Holiday - Labor Day, ThanksgiVing Day, Christmas Day,

New Year's Day, Memorial Day
• Eight Bus Garages will be available for all of Fiscal 2001
• Southern Avenue Annex will continue to operate peak period only service
• Arlington Garage will be a full service weekday facility
• Base for budget is the June 25,2000 schedule
• Ridership expansion and growth programs to be implemented during September

2000 and January 2001
• The Branch Avenue Green Line extension bus turnback plan will be effective
January 13, 2001
• Does not include reimbursable bus service

Page 44
METROBUS STATISTICS
For The Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY1998 FY 1999 FY2000 FY2001

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED
STATISTICS:
Total Bus Miles (000s) 42,181 41,343 40.875 41,749 42,342 45,723
Scheduled (bUdget) Bus Miles (ODDs) 41,242 40,507 39.991 40,907 41,483 44,864
* Total Passengers (OOOs) 107,763 105,703 108,524 124,531 128,240 141,142
Bus Fleet Size (Year End) 1,366 1,279 1,287 1,314 1,361 1,421
Scheduled Buses (Maximum) 1.179 1,138 1.119 1,141 1,182 1,235
Total Passenger Revenue (OOOS) $ 86.580 $ 85,422 $ 85,586 $ 87,061 $ 86,331 $ 93,197
Total Operating Revenue (OOOs) $ 95,418 $ 93,822 $ 95,574 $ 98,549 $ 95,904 $ 106,742
Total Operating Net Expenses (OOOs) $ 276,532 $ 276,573 $ 271,013 $ 272.576 $ 274,453 $ 297,144
Total Operating Assistance (OOOs) $ 181,114 $ 182,751 $ 175,439 $ 174,027 $ 178,549 $ 190,403
RATIOS:
Passengers Per Scheduled Bus Mile 2.61 2.61 2.71 3.04 3.09 3.15
Passengers Per Scheduled Bus 91,402 92,885 96,983 109,142 108,494 114,285
Cost Per Total Bus Mile 6.56 6.69 6.63 6.53 6.48 6.50
Garages Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile nla nla nla nla 0.12 0.12
Heavy Overhaul Shop Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile nla nla nla nla 0.25 0.25
Total Bus Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile 0.27 0.30 0.25 0.33 0.37 0.37
Cost Per Passenger $ 2.57 $ 2.62 $ 2.50 $ 2.19 $ 2.14 $ 2.11
* * Average Passenger Fare $ 0.80 $ 0.81 $ 0.79 $ 0.70 $ 0.67 $ 0.66
Passenger Revenue Per Scheduled Mile $ 2.10 $ 2.11 $ 2.14 $ 2.13 $ 2.08 $ 2.08
Operating Assistance Per Passenger $ 1.68 $ 1.73 $ 1.62 $ 1.40 $ 1.39 $ 1.35
Operating Assistance Per Bus-Total Fleet $ 132,587 $ 142,886 $ 136,316 $ 132,441 $ 131.190 S 133,992
Percentage of Operating Assistance to Cost 65.5% 66.1% 64.7% 63.8% 65.1% 64.1%
Percentage of Passenger Revenue to Cost 31.3% 30.9% 31.6% 31.9% 31.5% 31.4%
Percentage of Operating Revenue to Cost 34.5% 33.9% 35.3% 36.2% 34.9% 35.9%
* Bus ridership for fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001 have been restated to report unlinked trips. With fare simplification and fare integration,
a comparison of bus ridership can only be made by reporting total boardings. Total boardings include cash, bus transfer, rail transfer
and pass riders. Previously, bus transfers were not included in order to record each rider only once. The implementation of fare
simplification provides a regional bus transfer program, regional One Day pass (sold and accepted by all local bus systems) and a
flash pass program recognized and accepted by all local bus systems.
*,. Average is lower than base fare due to transfers and flash pass impact.
Operating Budget -- Metrobus Statistics

Page 45
COMPARISON OF BUS MILES OPERATED
FISCAL YEARS 1999 THROUGH 2001
FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001

ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVED
Regular Route 40,777,079 41,340,209 42,985,337

Scheduled Contract 39,979 26,691 25,953
September 2000 Service Plan 601,362
Dulles Reverse 539,270
January 2001 Service Plan 222,885
Branch Avenue Service Plan 287,663
Strategic 89,445 89,445 201,696
TOTAL SCHEDULED 40,906,503 41,456,345 44,864,166
Charter 140,536 175,000 175,000

Special Service 100,000 100,000 100,000
Change-Ofts 275,000 275,000 275,000
Yard Work 441,795 423,765 423,765
Missed Trips (115,000) (115,000) (115,000)
TOTAL UNSCHEDULED 842,331 858,765 858,765
TOTAL MILES 41,748,834 42,315,110 45,722,931
Estimated Articulated Bus

included in above 2,089,519 2,089,519 2,089,519

Page 46
DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICE
BUS OPERATORS
BY DIVISION AND CLASSIFICATION
FISCAL 2000 APPROVED FISCAL 2001 APPROVED

Fyll-Time part.Time Fyll-Time part.Time New Service
Bladensburg 344 24 343 30 13

Southeastern 256 14 258 2
Northern 270 4 263 17
Western 197 14 215 20
Southern Avenue Annex 28 13 25 28 9
Arlington 87 22 111 13 9
FourMile Run 210 52 200 49 9
Royal 96 20 76 29
Landover 212 40 216 40 4
Montgomery ~ ..1.3 2a1 22 §
Total 1924 216 1938 250 50
Does not include 16 new service operators assigned to the Montgomery County Ride-On

BUS OPERATORS
BY PROGRAM
Full Timel
Special Part·Time New Service
Fiscal 2000 Approved Budget (Actual) 1,906 248 22

- September 2000 Bus Program 14 1 6
- January 2001 Schedule Program 18 1 22
Fiscal 2001 End of Year 1,938 250 50
Does not include Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission or Montgomery County
Ride-One contracts

Page 47
FISCAL 2001 APPROVED
BUS OPERATOR PAY HOURS
FY 1999 FY2000 FY2001

ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED
SCHEDULED HOURS
Full-Time Operators 3,706,473 3,713,807 3,677,776
Part-Time Operators 309,163
New Service Operators 44,275
September 2000 Service Plan 60,761
Dulles Reverse 18,680
January 2001 Service Plan 19,188
Branch Avenue Service Plan 20,373
Subtotal· Scheduled 3,706,473 3,713,807 4,150,216
UNSCHEDULED HOURS
Overtime Extra Service 419,346 579,937 200,294
Utility 133,564 137,067 110,926
Standing Extra 23,440 20,039 26,571
Subcontract Charter 26,088 31,049 30,800
Miscellaneous 53,387 60,335 47,834
Training 73,633 147,848 200,789
Subtotal· Unscheduled 729,458 976,275 617,214
HOURS FOR PAID LEAVE

Vacation 380,570 367,433 378,912
Sick 139,280 163,794 140,434
Holiday 168,266 168,757 187,242
Funeral! Other 10,806 9,855 11,002
Subtotal- Paid Leave 698,922 709,839 717,590
TOTAL PAY HOURS 5,134,853 5,399,921 5,485,020
New Service Operators includes Lorton Contract Service.

Total pay hours does not include Montgomery County Ride-On Contract.

Page 48
FISCAL 2001
BUS FLEET
MAXIMUM TOTAL
SCHEDULED ACTIVE
FLEET FLEET
Fiscal 1999 End of Year (Actual) 1179 1357
o September 2000 Bus Programs 20 23
o Falls Church Electric Bus 2 4
o January 2001 Schedule Program 22 25
o Strategic Buses 12 12
Fiscal 2001 End of Year 1235 1421
Exclude 10 scheduled and 2 spares assigned to the

Montgomery County Ride-One Contract.
ACTIVE BUS FLEET

AVERAGE AGE
END OF FISCAL YEAR 2001
NUMBER AVERAGE
MANUFACTURER YEAR OF BUSES AGE
MAN 1983 31 18.0

METRO FLXIBLE 1986 89 15.0
GILLIG 1988 20 13.0
ORION 1992 60 9.0
IKARUS 1995 45 6.0
ORION 1998 172 3.0
ORION 1999 108 2.0
ORION II 2000 2 0.0
ORION V 2000 130 0.0
ORION VI 2Q.QQ 1QQ M
TOTAL 1,369

Page 49
BUS FLEET SIZE BY GARAGE
FISCAL YEARS 2000 AND 2001
FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
SCHEDULED TOTAL SCHEDULED TOTAL SPARE
FLEET FLEET FLEET (a) FLEET (a) RATIO
Bladensburg 191 224 207 242 16.910/0
Southeastern 110 129 117 137 17.090/0
Northern 138 164 133 158 18.80%
Western 113 131 118 137 16.10%
Southern Avenue Annex 56 65 60 70 16.67%
Arlington 68 76 67 76 13.43%
Four Mile Run 141 160 150 170 13.330/0
Royal 75 83 75 83 10.67°1'0
Landover 146 165 145 164 13.100k
Montgomery 144 164 151 172 13.91°k
Strategic ' 12 12 0.00%
SYSTEM TOTAL 1,182 1,361 1,235 1,421 15.06%
(a) Does not include 10 scheduled and 2 spares assigned to the Montgomery County Ride-On Contract

Page 50
0 DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICE
"C
..,Q)
CD
MECHANICS BY DIVISION
~.
::J
co
ro
c FISCAL 2000 APPROVED FISCAL 2001 APPROVED
c.
co MILEAGE MILES PER MILEAGE MILES PER
CD
r-+ W/OCHARTER MECHANICS MECHANIC W/OCHARTER MECHANICS MECHANIC
I
I
s:
CD
BLADENSBURG 7,355,559 104 70,727 6,614,796 107 61,821
..,
,.-+
SOUTHEASTERN 4,113,102 50 82,262 4.407,913 57 77,332
0
c- NORTHERN 3,960,212 58 68,280 3,937,768 64 61,528
c:
en WESTERN 3,223,952 38 84,841 3,617,160 42 86,123
en
r+
Q) ARLINGTON 2.663,811 22 121,082 3,045,493 27 112,796
,-to
iii" FOUR MILE RUN 5,724.369 56 102,221 6,275,500 63 99,611
d.
n
fJ) ROYAL 2,475.665 23 107,638 2,475,558 27 91,687
LANDOVER 6,585,958 59 111,626 6,797,340 64 106.208
MONTGOMERY 6,198,802 59 105.064 6,973,487 67 104,082
SOUTHERN AVENUE ANNEX 1,402,916 11 127,538
DIVISION TOTAL 42,301,430 469 90,195 45,547,931 529 86,102
BLADENSBURG SHOP 201 208

SYSTEM TOTAL 42,301,430 670 63,136 45,547,931 737 61,802
SERVICE VEHICLE SHOP 27 37
TOTAL MECHANICS 697 774
"U
Q)
co
CD
C11
~
DIESEL FUEL COSTS
Miles Cost of
FY2001 Per Total Diesel@
Total Miles * Gallon Gallons $O.74/Gal
BLADENSBURG 6,644,982 3.11 2,133,827 1,579,032
SOUTHEASTERN 4,422,010 2.77 1,595,342 1,180,553
NORTHERN 3,970,671 2.56 1,548,998 1,146,259
WESTERN 3,628,477 2.73 1,329,433 983,780
SOUTHERN AVENUE ANNEX 1,402,916 3.26 429,883 318,113
ARLINGTON 3,045,493 3.92 777,789 575,564
FOUR MILE RUN 6,299,584 3.59 1,754,451 1,298,294
ROYAL 2,478,577 4.02 616,279 456,046
LANDOVER 6,813,211 3.60 1,891,987 1,400,070
MONTGOMERY 7,017,010 3.39 2,070,017 1,531,813
GARAGE TOTAL 45,722,931 3.23 14,148,006 10,469,524
SHOPS 120,299 89,021
TOTAL DIESEL COSTS 45,722,931 14,268,305 10,558,546
* Does not include reimbursable services

Page 52
Fiscal 2001 Budget Summary
Regional/Non-Regional Costs
Metrobus service is designated by route as either regional or non-regional. The factors

used in determining whether a route is considered regional or non-regional include: the
alignment of inter-jurisdictional routes, routes operating on arterial streets, routes that
serve specific regional activity centers, and route cost effectiveness. These criteria
effectively allow for a delineation of all Metrobus service into th~ categories of regional
or non-regional routes, and the results are displayed by jurisdiction and by route on the
following pages.
This splitting of the Metrobus route system into regional and non-regional routes leads
in turn to an allocation of Metrobus operating costs into these same categories. The
approved fiscal 2001 total budget for Metrobus operating expenses (excluding
demonstration and reimbursable bus service) is approved at $297.1 million, which
represents the base of costs to be allocated between the categories of regional and
non-regional. A marginal costs analysis has been completed whereby those Metrobus
costs associated with the production of regional service have been identified and
segregated into a regional classification. The remaining costs are therefore, by
definition, non-regional.
To measure costs on a unit basis, platform hours are divided into the regional and non-
regional costs. Platform hours are measured from the time a bus leaves a garage until
it returns to a garage, and are associated with trips that are regular (in-service) trips
and non-revenue (deadhead) trips. The following table identifies the unit costs for bus
service as approved in the fiscal 2001 budget.
Platform Approved Cost Per

Hours Budget Hour
Regional .•.•••. 2,836,089 ..... 244,729,100 $86.29

Non-Regional • . . . 785,013. . . $52,415,300 $66.77
Total •....... 3,621,102 .... $297,144,400
Note: Figures do not contain platform hours or budgeted costs for demonstration and/or reimbursable bus service.
Operating Budget -- Regional/Non-Regional Bus Costs

Page 53
METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY
ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS

Base September 2000 January 2001
June 26, 2000 Service Service
Schedule Changes Changes Total
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REGIONAL 1.394,263 16.292 10.775 1.421.330

NON-REGIONAL 330,249 3,152 10.915 344.316
:tJ
CD MARYLAND REGIONAL 753.541 16.890 14.244 784.675
CO
312,372 330 1.742 314.444
o'
::J
NON-REGIONAL
D> VIRGINIA REGIONAL 616.694 13,390 0 630,084

NON-REGIONAL 123.473 2.781 0 126 254
1
z
o TOTAL REGIONAL 2.764.498 46,572 25.018 2.836.089
::1 NON-REGIONAL 766,094 6.262 12,657 785.013
I
:JJ
CD TOTAL - REGULAR ROUTE SERVICE 3,530,592 52,835 37,675 3,621,102
CO
o DEMONSTRATION 27,447 17.966 0 45.413
::J
Q) OTHER 24,571 0 0 24.571
III TOTAL PLATFORM HOURS 3,582,609 70,801 37.675 3,691,086

c:
C/)
n
o
~
en
Platform hours relating to the Friday and Saturday 1:00 a.m. and 2:00 s.m. Metrorail closing Is contained within the base schedule.
0
'"C METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY
..,
CD
Q)
r-+
:J ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
CO
OJ
C ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS
C.
(Q Base September 2000 January 2001
(1) DISTRICT OF June 26, 2000 Service Service
r+
COLUMBIA ROUTES LINEHAME Schedule Changes Changes Total
:IJ 30,32.34,35,36 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE 146.170 1.133 6,194 153.497

CD 42 MOUNT PLEASANT 61,078 0 61.078
CO
o· 52,53,54
60,62,64
14TH STREET
PETWORTH -11TH STREET
80.937
21,665
412
0
81.349
21.665
:J
Q) 62 TAKOMA-PETWORTH 19,794 0 19.794
66.68 PETWORTH - 11TH STREET 35,486 0 35A86
"""-
70.71 GEORGIA AVE-7TH ST 90,773 0 90.773
Z 80 NORTH CAPITOL ST 51.156 0 51,156
0
::J 90.92 U ST-GARFIELD 94,917 0 2.102 97,019
J
91,93 GARFIELD OWL 5,854 0 256 6,110
:0
CD 94.95 STANTONRO 12,015 0 (140) 11,875
(Q 96.97 EAST CAPITOL ST-CARDOZO 47,846 0 47,846
0 A2.3,6.7,8.42.46,48 ANACOSTIA-CONGRESS HEIGHTS 76,424 0 (1,884) 74,540
::J A4,A5 ANACOSTIA-FORT DRUM 20,274 0 20.274
Q)
A9 SOUTH CAPITOL ST 9,360 0 9.360
m
c::
82 BLADENSBURG RD-ANACOSTIA 54.280 (2,145) 52.136
01.3.6 SIBLEY HOSPITAL-STADIUM ARMORY 66.860 412 67.272
VJ
05 MACARTHUR BLVD...GEORGETOWN 3,792 0 3,792
n E2,E3.E4 MILITARY RO-CROSSTOWN 45,931 0 45.931
0 24,858
en G2 P ST-lEDROIT PARK 0 24,858
,-+
en G8 RHODE ISLAND AVE 33,039 0 33.039
H1 BROOKLAND-POTOMAC PARK 4,738 4,738
H2,H3. H4 CROSSTOWN 49.681 0 49,681
L1,L2 CONNECTICUT AVE 36,290 0 36,290
l4 CONNECTICUT AVENUE 3.914 3,914
N1,N2,N3.N4 MASSACHUSETTS AVE 41,743 0 41143
S1 16TH ST-POTOMAC PARK 9.118 0 9,118
52.54 16TH ST 93.257 0 93.257
U2 MINNESOTA AVENUE-ANACOSTIA 7,828 7,828
V5 FAIRFAX VllLAGE-l'ENFANT PLAZA 7,465 0 (667) 6,798
V6,V7,V8,V9 MINNESOTA AVE-M ST 41.683 0 41.683
W4 DEANWOOD-ALABAMA AVE 40,960 0 40,960
W9 DEFENSE FACILITIES SHUTTLE 2,913 0 2.913
Xi BENNING RD-POTOMAC PARK 9,195 0 9,195
"'U X2 BENNING RD-H ST 59,446 0 59,446
Q)
CO NAVY YARD 4,914 4,914
CD
01 TOTAL D.C. REGIONAL 1,394,263 16,292 10.775 1,421.330
01
METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON·REGIONAl ROUTE SUMMARY
ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS

Base September 2000 January 2001
June 26. 2000 Service Service
MARYLAND ROUTES LINE NAMES Schedule Changes Changes Total
JJ 81.82,83,86 MARYLAND AVE 49.488 49,488

CD 84,85 RHODE ISLAND AVE-NEW CARROLLTON 16,904 16,904
CO
A11.A12.A15 M L KING JR HWY 40,317 40,317
o C2,C4 GREENBEL~TWINBROOK 64.322 6,796 71,118
::J
Q) C7,C9 GREENBELT-GLENMONT LINE 10.094 10,094
C8 GLENMONT-COLLEGE PARK 11 17,229 17,229
C11.C13 CLINTON EXPRESS 9,920 (2.504) 7,416
z
o C12,C14 HILLCREST HEIGHTS 9.244 507 9,751
:::J
I
012,S12 EASTOVER-MARLOW HEIGHTS 12,921 1.184 14.105
:JJ F1.F2 CHILLUMRD 22,404 22,404
(1) F4,F6 PRINCE GEORGE'S-SILVER SPRING 46,806 46,806
CO 22,949
H11.12.14 MARLOW HEIGHTS (4,948) 18,001
o J1,J2.J3 BETHESDA-SILVER SPRING 55,886 55,886
::J
Q) K6 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE·MARYLAND 35.988 35,988
K12,K19 FORESTVILLE 20,926 748 21,673
OJ M11 SUITLAND 8,700 (4,072) 4.628
c
en N7 MONTG MALL-FED TRIANGLE EXPRESS 4.138 4,138
n P12 EASTOVERMADDISON RD 31.934 4,436 36.370
o P13 EASTOVER-PENTAGON EXPRESS 2,138 2.138
en
,.... P17,18,19 OXON HILL-FORT WASHINGTON 16,093 (585) 15,508
(J)
Q1.02 VEIRS MILL RD 62,962 62.962
R1.2,5 RIGGSRD 24,696 24,696
T18 ANNAPOLIS RO 26,937 26,937
V12 ADDISON RO-POTOMAC AVE 13,839 (722) 13,117
W11,12,15.17 EASTOVER-INDIAN HEAD HWY 19,017 7,096 26,113
W13,W14 BOCKRD 9.593 234 9.827
Y7,8,9 GEORGIA AVE-MARYLAND 57,627 57.627
Z8 FAIRLAND 31,473 31,473
14ABM BETHESDA-TYSONS EXPRESS 9,525 9,525
14C,14D LAKEFOREST-TYSONS EXPRESS 9,568 9.568
BRANCH AVE-KrNG ST 0 12,870 12.870
TOTAL MARYLAND REGIONAL 753.541 16.890 14,244 784,675
1/ Mld.day and Sa'urrlay service was added September 28. 1998 as experimental service; made permanent In July 1999. Does not Include the proposed extension of this line to White Flint.
" l -
0 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY

"'C FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET
..,
CD
Q)
cr. ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
::s
CO
CD ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS
c Base September 2000 January 2001
a. June 26, 2000 Service Service
CO
CD VIRGINIA ROUTES LINE NAMES Schedule Changes Changes Total
r-+
:JJ 1BCDEFZ WILSON BLVD-FAIRFAX 38,886 38,886

CD 2ABCG WASHINGTON BLVD 42,092 42,092
CO
O· 3ABEF LEEHWY 36.224 36,224
:::J 4ABEHS PERSHING DR-ARLINGTON BLVD 23,848 23,848
Q) 7ABCDEFHPWX L1NCOLNIA-NORTH FAIRLINGTON 40.073 40,073
'- 8SWXZ FOXCHASE-SEMINARY VALLEY 12,800 12,800
9AE FORT BELVOIR-PENTAGON 46,382 46,382
Z 9N,9P ALEXANDRIA-POTOMAC YARD C. 0 12,978 12,978
0
:::J 10AE HUNTING TOWERS-PENTAGON 23,174 23,174
I
:D 10BCD ALEXANDRIA-ARLINGTON 38,397 38,397
CD 11Y MT VERNON EXPRESS 3,018 412 3,430
CO 13ABFGM NATL AIRPORT-PENTAGON-WASHINGTON 15,425 15,425
0 14T,W TYSON'S WEST PARK SHUTILE 8,295 8,295
:::J 15KL CHAIN BRIDGE RD 10,487 10,487
Q)
16ABCDEFGJL COLUMBIA PIKE 49,819 49,819
OJ 16SUWX SHIRLINGTON-PENTAGON 11,120 11,120
C 22ABCF WALKER CHAPEL-PENTAGON 21,853 21,853
rn
23ABCT MCLEAN-CRYSTAL CITY 44,649 44,649
(')
0
24MP BALLSTON-PENTAGON 7,796 7,796
rn
r-+
25AFGJPR BALLSTON-BRADLEE-PENTAGON 18,083 18,083
rn 258 LANDMARK-BALLSTON 14,826 14,826
28AB ALEXANDRIA-TYSONS CORNER 40,048 40,048
28FG SKYLINE CITY 4,363 4,363
29CEGHX ANNANDALE 20,043 20,043
29KMN ALEXANDRIA-FAIRFAX 19,636 19,636
38B BALLSTON-FARRAGUT SQUARE 19.606 19,606
VARIOUS 5.751 5,751
TOTAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL 616,694 13,390 0 630.084
""U
Q)
CO
CD
(J1
"'-J
-00 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY
OlU FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET
COm
CD..,
C1I~ NON-REGIONAL ROUTES
005·
r.c
m ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS
c
C. Base September 2000 January 2001
(Q June 28, 2000 Service Service
DISTRICT OF
CD
r-+ COLUMBIA ROUTES LINE NAME Schedule Changes Changes Total
88.89 FORT LINCOLN SHUTTLE 5,730 309 6,039

:IJ
CD D2 GLOVER PARK-DUPONT CIRCLE 16,180 41 16.221
CO D4 IVY CITY-UNION STATION 16,842 16.842
o·
::J
D8 HOSPITAL CENTER 25.418 968 26,386
Q) E6 CHEVY CHASE 5,530 5.530
H5,7 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS-MOUNT PLEASANT 3,683 3,683
.........
H6 BROOKLAND-FORT LINCOLN LOOP 18,811 18,811
Z H8,H9 PARK RD-BROOKLAND 22,736 906 23,643
0
K2 TAKOMA-FORT TOTTEN 5.958 5,958
:J , L30~34 OYSTER/LEWIS SCHOOL 2,080 2,080
JJ
CD M4 NEBRASKA AVE 10,450 10.450
CO M6 FAIRFAX VILLAGE 4,668 2,775 7,443
o·
~
M20 SE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SHUTTLE 13.101 2,138 15.238
N8 VAN NESS-WESLEY HEIGHTS LOOP 11,594 11,594
~ ANACOSTIA-ECKINGTON 39,499 39.499
P1.P2,P6
OJ U4 SHERIFF RD-RIVER TERRACE 10,560 927 11,487
C
en U5.U6 MAYFAIR-MARSHALL HEIGHTS 21,665 21,665
U8 CAPITOL HEIGHTS-BENNING HEIGHTS 28,549 28,549
n W1,W2 FT STANTON-WASHINGTON OVERLOOK 15,773 1.440 17,212
0
,....
(J)
W6.W8 GARFIELD-ANACOSTIA LOOP 27.165 27.165
en X8 MARYLAND AVE 8,017 8.017
98 ADAMS MORGAN-U STREET LINK 7.231 7,231
99 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS-WOODLEY PARK LOOP 1,768 1.768
SCHOOL SERVICE (VARIOUS) 7,243 7,243
New Routes reo Branch 4.563 4,563
TOTAL DC NON-REGIONAL 330,249 3,152 10,915 344,316

0 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY
U FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET
,
CD
,....
Q) NON-REGIONAL ROUTES
:::J
CO ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS
CD Base September 2000 January 2001
c: June 26, 2000 Service Service
a. MARYLAND ROUTeS LINE NAME Schedule Changes Changes Total
CO
CD
r+ 87,88 LAUREL EXPRESS 8,925 8,925 Prince George's County
89,89M LAUREL 6,600 329.6 6.930 Prince George's County
821,822 BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY 7,350 7,350 Prince George's County
JJ 823,824 BOWIE-BELAIR 9,163 9,163 Prince George's County
CD 825 BOWIE-NEW CARROLLTON 3.375 3.375 Prince George's County
ce C7 TWINBROOK·SILVER SPRING 4.000 4,000 Montgomery County
0 C21,22,23,24.25,26,29 CENTRAL AVENUE 23,198 23,198 Prince George's County
:::J
OJ C28 POINTER RIDGE 5,795 5.795 Prince George's County
FB PRINCE GEORGE'S-LANGLEY PARK 16.404 16.404 Prince George's County
........... 6,405 6,405
F12 ARDWICK INDUSTRiAl PARK SHUITLE Prince George's County
Z F13 CHEVERLY-WASH BUSINESS PARK 8,333 8,333 Prince George's County
0 F14 SHERIFF RD 14,650 1,742 16.392 Prince George's County
::J J8.9 1-270 EXPRESS 7.355 7,355 Montgomery County
•
:D J11.12.13.14.15 MARLBORO PIKE 15,420 15,420 Prince George's County
CD L7.L8 CONNECTICUT AVE·MARYlAND 22,078 22.078 Montgomery COunty
CO R3 GREENBELT-FORT TOTTEN 14,813 14,813 Prince George's County
0 R4 QUEENS CHAPEL RD 12.049 12.049 Prince George's County
::J R12 KENILWORTH AVE·NEW CARROLLTON 22,967 22.967 Prince George's County
Q)
T2 RIVERRD 19.265 19,265 Montgomery County
T15,16,17 GREENBELT 14,143 14.143 Prince George's County
tD
c: V14,15 DISTRICT HEIGHTS 16,373 16,373 Prince George's COunty
(J) Z1.4 GLENMONT-SILVER SPRING 10,475 10,475 Montgomery County
n
0
Z315
Z2
COLESVILLE..FAIRLAND EXPRESS
COLESVILLE RD
6.033
15.313
6.033
15.313
Montgomery County
Montgomery County
en
..... Z7,9,17,19 OLD COLUMBIA PIKE EXPRESS 8,550 8,550 Montgomery County
en Z11 BRIGGS CHANEY PARK & RIDE EXPRESS 9,818 9,818 Montgomery County
229 BURTONSVilLE EXPRESS 3,525 3,525 Montgomery County
TOTAL MARYLAND NON-REGIONAL 312,372 330 1.742 314.444
MONTGOMERY COUNTY - NON-REGIONAL 106,410 0 0 106,410

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY - NON-REGIONAL 205,962 330 1742 208,034
TOTAL MARYLAND NON-REGIONAL 312,372 330 1,742 314.444
\J
w
CO
CD
01
CD
-00 METROBUS REGIONAL AND NON-REGIONAL ROUTE SUMMARY
0)-0
COco FISCAL 2001 APPROVED BUDGET
(0..,
mS NON-REGIONAL ROUTES
OS'
ee
OJ ANNUAL PLATFORM HOURS
c: Base September 2000 January 2001
C-
eo Juno 26, 2000 Service ServIce
CD Schedule Changes Changes
r-+
VIRGINIA ROUTES LINE NAME
:0 2W VIENNA-OAKTON 2,200 2,200 Fairfax County

CD
CO 3WZ WESTPARK-WEST FALLS CHURCH 3,863 3.863 Fairfax County
o· 11P ALEXANDRIA-NATIONAL AIRPORT 1.680 1.680 Alexandria
::J 12CD CENTREVILLE NORTH 4.280 4.280 Fairfax County
Q)
12EF CENTREVILLE SOUTH 5,488 8,269 Fairfax County
12lM LITTLE ROCKY RUN-VIENNA 4,143 4,143 Fairfax County
o
z 12RS
17ABFM
SULLY STATION-VIENNA
KINGS PARK
6.905
13,663
6,905 Fairfax County
Fairfax County
13,663
::J 17GHKL KINGS PARK EXPRESS 20.680 20,680 Fairfax County
r
::0 18EF SPRINGFIELD 4,263 4,263 Fairfax County
CD 18GHJ ORANGE HUNT 9,308 9,308 Fairfax County
eo
O· 18P,18R,18S
20FVWXY
BURKE CENTRE
CHANTILLY-GREENBRIAR
17,003
8,258
17,003
8.258
Fairfax County
Fairfax County
:::J
Q) 21ABCDF LANDMARK-PENTAGON 11,468 11,468 Alexandria
24T MCLEAN HAMLET-EAST FALLS CHURCH 3,680 3.680 Fairfax County
m
c 28C KING ST. - NVCC 6,595 6,595 Alexandria
(J)
n TOTAL VIRGINIA NON..REGIONAL 123,473 2,781 o 126,254

o
en
r-+
en DEMO
G1 GREENBELT PK LOT SHUTIlE 2,220 2,220
829 CROFTON-NEW CARROLLTON 2.388 2,388
891 SPRINGFIELD SHUTTLE 2,330 2,330
S80,81 SPRINGFIELD LOOP 11,495 11,495
26A.E ELECTRIC BUS EAST FALLS CHURCH 6,957 6,957
26W ELECTRIC BUS WEST FALLS CHURCH 2,058 2,058
DULLES REVERSE 17.966 17 t 966
190 LORTON 3.341 3.341
23 Shelter OCCU CTR 75 75
899 Operator Shuttres 8,235 8.235
Farebox 12,920 12.920
METRORAIL
• REVENUE
• EXPENSE
• STATISTICS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
-, Operating Budget -- Metrorail

Page 61
This Page Not Used
Operating Budget-- Metrorail

Page 62
Rail Service
Where it Comes From

Revenues $281.6
Where it Goes
Propulsion $ 27.7
Materials $28.9
Services $26.4
Personnel $301.2
$ Millions
Operating Budget -- Metrorail

Page 63
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - METRORAIL
Fjscal1999 Fjscal2000 Fjscal2001 Change
REVENUES
Passenger $247,179.3 $238,039.7 $252,542.4 $14,502.7
Other Passenger 812.3 900.0 900.0 0.0
Parking 9,289.0 8,856.7 9,586.8 730.1
Advertising 3,883.9 2,840.2 4,582.8 1,742.6
Joint Development 4,912.7 4,130.5 4,758.4 627.9
Other 7A92.8 5,799.8 9,114.0 3,314.2
Total Revenues $273,629.4 $260,633.1 $281,550.6 $20,917.5
EXPENSES
Personnel $272,703.5 $284,172.3 $301,151.8 $16,979.5
Services 22,014.8 21,939.3 26,432.0 4,492.7
Materials & Supplies 28,481.8 31,163.8 28,904.3 -2,259.5
Fuel & Propulsion Power 26,998.2 29,850.8 27,661.8 -2,189.0
Utilities 15,099.3 16,578.6 16,892.7 314.1
Casualty & Liability 2,490.1 2 732.1
1 2,667.5 -64.6
Leases & Rentals 1 130.3
1 2,029.0 2,141.1 112.1
Miscellaneous -1,447.7 -999.5 2,290.9 3,290.4
Preventive Maintenance 0.0 -3,000.0 -1 AOO.O 1,600.0
Total Expenses $367,470.3 $384,466.4 $406,742.0 $22,275.6
GROSS SUBSIDY $93,840.9 $123,833.3$125,191.4 $1,358.1
Gross Subsidy $93,840.9 $123,833.3 $123,833.3 $1,358.1

Less: Audit Adjustment 13,844.8 -13,166.0 -17,548.0 -4,382.0
Plus Debt Service 27,484 27,484.2 27,484.2 0.0
Net Local Subsidy $135,169.9 $138,151.5 $133 769.5

1 -$3,023.9
Operating Budget -- Metrorail Financial Tables

Page 64
METRO~LBUDGETSUMMARY
Fjscal1999 Ejscal2QQQ Ejscal2QQ1 .c.biI.Dsm

Full-TIme Salaries 57,676.0 73,597.4 79.566.9 5.969.5
Part TIme Salaries 53.8 15.4 0.0 -15.4
Salary Lapse 0.0 -2,294.7 -4,316.4 -2,021.7
Overtime Salaries 5,086.5 3,106.8 3,786.2 679.4
Salaries (Total) $63,312.5 $74,490.2 $79,036.7 $4,546.5
Operator Wages 54,062.6 48,177.8 49,616.4 1,438.6
Full TIme Wages 85,968.2 99,188.7 108,422.5 9,233.9
Part TIme Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wage Lapse 0.0 -1,601.3 -4,479.0 -2,877.7
Overtime Wages 12,074.5 2,714.9 7,711.5 4,996.6
Wages (Total) $152,105.3 $148,480.0 $161,271.4 $12,791.4
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $215,417.8 $222,970.2 $240,308.1 $17,337.9
Fringe Benefits 51,841.7 56,537.4 56,321.5 -216.0
Fringes (Total) $57,285.8 $61,202.0 $60,843.7 -$358.4
Management Fee 2,194.2 2,638.5 2,638.5 0.0

Professional &Technical 12,243.8 7,025.5 7,700.6 675.1
Temporary Help 573.9 717.1 833.6 116.5
Contract Maintenance 5,114.7 9,276.7 11,502.0 2,225.3
Paratransit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 1,888.2 2,281.5 3,757.3 1.475.8
Services (Total) $22,014.8 $21,939.3 $26,432.0 $4,492.7
Fuel and Lubricants 320.0 531.3 632.0 100.7
Tires 53.0 67.0 74.6 7.6
Other 28,108.8 30,565.5 28,197.7 -2.367.8
Materials & Supplies (Total) $28,481.8 $31,163.8 $28,904.3 -$2,259.5
Diesel Fuel 3.7 51.0 95.4 44.4
Propulsion Power 26,994.5 29,799.8 27,566.4 -2,233.4
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $26,998.2 $29,850.8 $27,661.8 -$2,189.0
Electricity and Gas 12,884.8 14,294.3 14,583.8 289.5
Utilities - Other 2.214.4 2.284.3 2,308.9 24.6
Utilities (Total) $15,099.3 $16,578.6 $16,892.7 $314.1
Insurance 892.8 1.294.6 1.230.0 -64.6
Claims 1.597.3 1,437.5 1,437.5 0.0
Casualty & Uability (Total) $2,490.1 $2,732.1 $2,667.5 464.6
Property 67.3 75.4 254.6 179.2
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equipment 1,063.0 1,953.6 1,886.5 -67.1
Leases (Total) $1,130.3 $2,029.0 $2,141.1 $112.1
Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 549.0 595.5 1.043.0 447.5
Other 178.3 322.0 2,816.8 2,494.8
Reimbursements -3,014.1 -2,742.6 -2,758.8 -16.2
Reimbursements (Total) -$3,014.1 -$2,742.6 -$2,758.8 -516.2
TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST $94,766.8 $103,294.1 $106,990.2 $3,696.1
Less: Preventive Maintenance . -3,000.0 -1.400.0 1.600.0
TOTAL METRORAIL COST $367,470.3 $384,466.4 $406,742.0 $22,275.6
"Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Page 65
FISCAL 2001
RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS
• 250 Weekdays, 58 Saturdays, 57 Sundays.
• Saturday Schedule - Holiday - July 4th , Columbus Day*, Veteran's Day*,

Martin Luther King's Birthday*, - President's Day*, (* Indicates 5:30AM Opening)
• Sunday Schedule - Holiday - Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day,

New Year's Day, Memorial Day
• Base for budget is the June 25, 2000 schedule which includes the late opening
until 2:00AM Fridays and Saturdays
• Convert three Orange Line trippers to six-cars for opening of new Vienna Garage
January 1, 2001
• Branch Avenue Service Extension:

• Pre-revenue operation commences December 24, 2000
• Revenue operation commences January 13, 2001
• Station Manager pick effective January 7, 2001
• Train/Consist Requirement: 12 Four-Car and 5 Six-Car Trains
• Branch Avenue tail track used for overnight storage and reporting location for
station managers/train operators
• No Red Line expansion to Shady Grove
• Seasonal Operation to reflect current weekday and weekend car consists
• Mel Center car miles to reflect system growth to Branch Avenue

Page 66
METRORAIL STATISTICS
For The Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY 2001

STATISTICS:
Total car Miles (OOOs) 44,823 43,408 48,790 50,394 50,835 56,399
Revenue Car Miles (OOOs) 43,403 41,988 47,190 48,794 49,700 54,799
Total Passengers (OOOs) 145,739 148,041 156,192 157,220 158,975 166,002
Total Passenger Revenue (OOOs) $ 222,681 $ 225,973 $ 242,129 $ 247,992 $ 238,940 $ 253,442
Total Operating Revenue (OOOs) $ 239,286 $ 244,469 $ 262,025 $ 273,629 $ 260,633 $ 281,551
Total Operating Net Expensese (OOOs) $ 334,130 $ 337,512 $ 353,509 $ 367,470 $ 384,466 $ 406,742
Total Opearting Assistance (OOOs) $ 94,844 $ 93,043 $ 91,484 $ 93,841 $ 123,833 $ 125,191
RATIOS:
Passengers Per Scheduled Car Mile 3.36 3.53 3.31 3.22 3.20 3.03
Cost Per Scheduled Car Mile $ 7.70 $ 8.04 S 7.49 $ 7.53 $ 7.74 $ 7.42
Rail Maintenance Parts Costs Per Mile $ 0.21 $ 0.21 $ 0.19 $ 0.14 $ 0.13 $ 0.13
~tPerPassenger $ 2.29 $ 2.28 $ 2.26 $ 2.34 S 2.42 $ 2.45
Average Passenger Fare $ 1.53 $ 1.53 $ 1.55 $ 1.58 $ 1.50 $ 1.53
Operating Assistance Per Passenger $ 0.65 $ 0.63 $ 0.59 $ 0.60 $ 0.78 S 0.75
Percentage of Operating Assistance to Cost 28.4% 27.6% 25.9% 25.5% 32.2% 30.8%
Percentage of Passenger Revenue to Total Cost 66.6% 67.0% 68.5% 67.5% 62.1% 62.3%
Percentage of Operating Revenue to Cost 71.6% 72.4% 74.1% 74.5% 67.8% 69.2%
Operating Budget -- Metrorail Statistics

Page 67
-00
D)u WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
(Qm RAIL SERVICE LEVELS
CD ..,
O>~ FISCAL YEAR 1999 THROUGH 2001
OJ ::r
co
OJ Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-End
c
c-
eo
,....
CD Red Line Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove
Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor
s:
CD Blue Line Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield Addison Rd/Franconia-Springfield
~
~
...,
0
m Orange Line New CarrolltonNienna New CarrolitonNienna New CarrolltonNienna
-
,...
U>
Yellow Line Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square Huntingotn/Mt. Vernon Square Huntingotn/Mt. Vernon Square
m
I""fo
C;;.
d'. Green Line AnacostialU Street-Cardozo GreenbeltlAnacostia Greenbelt/Branch Avenue
n
en
Rush Hour Trains

Red Line 37 37 37
Blue Line 21 21 21
Orange Line 31 31 31
Yellow Line 10 10 10
Green Line
Anacostia to U St Cardozo 6
Greenbelt to Farragut North 8
Greenbelt to Anacostia 13
Greenbelt to Branch Ave 17
Gap 7 7 7
Start-UP 1 1 1
TOTAL 121 120 124

r l, I ,(
I .;;.,.( ,. I - . ~ • t ~
Rail Lines 1999 Year-End 2000 Year-End 2001 Year-End

0
"C
CD Cars Per Train Rush Hours
-.
Q) Red Line 37..6's 37-6's 37-6's
~.
:J Blue Line 17-4's/4-6'8 17-4'8/4-6's 17-4's/4-6's
co 11-4l s/20-6's 84's/23-6's
Orange Line 11 ..4's/20-6's
[D
c Yellow Line 10-4'8 10-4's 10-4'8
0-
ce Green Line
,....
CD
Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 6-4'8
Greenbelt to Farragut North a-6's
~ Greenbelt to Anacostia 13-4's
,....
CD
.., Greenbelt to Branch Ave 12-4'5/5-6'8
..,
0
Q) Gap 7-6'8 7-6'5 7-6'8
- Start-UP 1-4 1-4 1-4
U>
,..... Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2000 5..2's 5-2'5
Q)
d". Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2001 5-2's
en
d". Cars Per Train Weekday Base/Nlght
\)
en Red Line (B) 4/4 4/4 4/4
Blue Line 4/2 4/4 4/4
Orange Line (B) 4/4 4/4 4/4
Yellow Line 4/2 4/4 4/4
Green Line
Anacostia to U St./Cardozo 2/2
Greenbelt to Ft. Totten 2/2
Greenbelt to Anacostia 4/4
Greenbelt to Branch Ave 4/4
Cars Per Train Saturday/Sunday
Red Line
Glenmont .. Shady Grove 4/4 4/4 4/4
Silver Spring - Gorsvenor 4/2 4/4 4/4
Blue Line (A) 4/4 4/4 4/4
Oragne Line (A) 4/4 4/4 4/4
Yellow Line (A) 2/2 4/4
"'U Green Line
Q.1
co Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 2/2
CD Greenbelt to Ft. Totten 2/2
m Greenbelt to Anacostia (A) 4/4
CD
Acacostia to Branch Ave (A) 4/4
(A) Saturday & Sunday Night, 2 Car Consist Is Utilized
(8) During Peak Tourist Season, 6 Car Consist Utilized On Red Line (Silver Spring-Grosvenor), Orange Line
-00
0>-0
com
CD .,
Peak Scheduled Rail Cars
~~ Red Line 222 222 222
05· Blue Line 92 92 92
(Q
Orange Line 164 164 170
(D
c Yellow Line 40 40 40
a.
(0 Green Line
<D
,..... Anacostia to U St.lCardozo 24
Greenbelt to Ft. Totten/Farragut North 48
~ Greenbelt to Anacostia 52
m
r-+ Greenbelt to Branch Ave 78
-,
0
~
m Gap 42 42 42
(J) Start-UP 4 4 4
r-+
Q) Ridership Pattern Adjustment - Fiscal 2000 10 10
r-+
,.....
iii" Ridership Pattem Fiscal- Fiscal 2001
o·
en Total Scheduled Car Requirement 636 626 658
Spares (20%) 128 126 132
Revenue Collection 4 4 4
Total Car Requirement 768 756 794
Hourse of Operation
Weekday 18.5 18.5 18.5
Saturday 16 16 16
Sunday 16 16 16
Days of Operation
Weekday (1) 251 (1) 252 (1) 250
Saturday (2) 57 (2) 57 (2) 58
Sunday (3) 57 (3) 57 (3) 57
(1) Extended Service New Year's Eve.

(2) Saturday Schedule - ** Columbus Day. ** Veteran's Day. **Martin Luther King's Birthday, **President's Day, 4th of July modified.
(3) Sunday Schedule - Thanksgiving. Christmas. New Years Day. Memorial Day. Labor Day.
• I I ~ , I , I , t I I ;. •

0
-c Rush Hour Headways (Minutes Between Trains)
(1)
...,
,....
OJ Red Line
::J Glenmont - Shady Grove 6 6 6
(C
Silver Spring - Shady Grove 3 3 3
mc Orange Line 6# 6# 6#
a. Blue Line 6 6 6
co
,....
CD
Yellow line 6 6 6
I
I Green Line
s:
CD
Anacostia to U St./Cardozo 6
,......
., Greenbelt to Farragut North 9
.,0 Greenbelt to Anacostia 6
Q)
Aca~ostia to Branch Ave 6
-
en
~
m Non-Rush Hour • Mldday-Weekday/SaUSu" • Minytes Between Trains
.....
en"
,..... Red Line
o·
(JJ
Glenmont - Shady Grove 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15
Silver Spring • Gorsvenor 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15
Blue Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15
Oragne Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15
Yellow Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15
Green Line
Anacostia to U St./Cardozo 12/12/15 12/12/15
Greenbelt to Ft Totten 12/12/15 12/12/15
Greenbelt to Anacostia 12/12/15
Acacostia to Branch Ave 12/12/15
# During times of observed peaking in ridership tripper trains are operated.

RAIL CAR MILES
FISCAL 2001
FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001
Red Line 19,409,626 21,074,812

Blue Line 8,939,916 9,504,308
Orange Lin 10,992,371 11,932,571
Yellow Line 2,987,752 3,430,277
Green Line ( Inner) 1,326,525 4,838,237
Green Line (Outer) 2,268,925
Mid-City Green 461,236 **
Enhanced Red Line 464,400
Branch Avenue Extension 1,489,608
MCI Arena 1,696,856 1,704,635
Ridership Pattern 650,000 325,000
Gap Trains 500,000 500,000
Sub-Total Revenue Miles 49,697,607 54,799,448
Start-Up/Breda Testing 200,000 200,000

Revenue Collection 700,000 700,000
Other 700,000 700,000
Total Car Miles 51,297,607 56,399,448
** Included in Green Line Above

Page 72
RAIL OPERATORS
PAYHOURS
FISCAL 2001

ACTUAL APPROVED APPROVEP
Scheduled 663,789 782,118 799,398
Start-up 12,356 9,408 18,426
Interlocking 70,477 63,410 63,237
Mid-City Green Line 3,516 (A)
Enhanced Red Line 5,400
Branch Avenue Extension 11,354
Subtoal Scheduled Pay Hours 746,622 863,852 892,415
Over Schedule 210,056 90,084 96,629

Start-Up Overtime 3,321 3,485 3,485
Standing Extra 194 800 800
Branch Avenue ~,880 5,760
Utility 56,022 47,044 46,844
Training I Retraining 57,784 44,300 44,300
Miscellaneous 7,105 5,700 5,700
Funeral 2,410 1,413 1,413
Vacation 97,429 111,622 111,622
Sick 29,951 30,412 30,412
Holiday 33,214 38,866 38,866
Subtotal Non-Scheduled 497,486 376,606 385,831
Total Pay Hours 1,244,108 1,240,458 1,278,246
t (A) Included in scheduled pay hours

Page 73
RAIL OPERATORS yEAR END FISCAL 2001
SUBTOTAL ABSENT. TOTAL

WEEK SAI s.u.ti OPERATORS EElSM OPERATORS
ALEXANPRIA
YARD 7 6 6
GAP 3 3 4
REVENUE 45 30 26
TREASURY 2 0 0
SUBTOTAL 57 39 36 71 11 82
BRENTWOOP
YARD 7 6 6
GAP 2 0 0
REVENUE 18 11 7
SUBTOTAL 27 17 13 32 6 38
NEW CARROLLTON
YARD 7 6 6
GAP 4 2 2
REVENUE 34 27 22
SUBTOTAL 45 35 30 58 8 66
SHADY GROVE
YARD 7 6 6
GAP 2 2 2
REVENUE 35 20 18
SUBTOTAL 44 28 26 54 8 62
GLENMONT
YARD 6 6 6
GAP 0 0 0
REVENUE 22 12 11
SUBTOTAL 28 18 17 35 4 39
WEST FALLS CHURCH

YARD 7 6 6
GAP 2 2 2
REVENUE 31 12 9
SUBTOTAL 40 20 17 47 7 54
GREENBELT
YARD 6 6 6
GAP 2 21 2
REVENUE 31 16 14
SUBTOTAL 39 43 22 48 6 54
SYSTEM TOTAL
YARD 47 42 42
GAP 15 11 12
REVENUE 216 128 107
TREASURY 2
TOTAL 280 181 161 345 50 395
START·UP 8
TRAINING 8
RETRAINING 8"
UTJUTY 10
BRANCH AVENUE 12
TOTAL 441
Page 74
INTERLOCKING OPERATORS YEAR END FISCAL 2001
SUBTOTAL ABSENT- TOTAL

WEEK SAl SW3I. OPERATORS EEISM OPERATORS
ALEXANDRIA 3 3 3 4 1 5
BRENTWOOD 3 3 3 4 1 5
NEW CARROLLTON 3 3 3 4 1 5
GREENBELT 3 3 3 4 0 4
SHADY GROVE 3 3 3 4 1 5
GLENMONT 3 3 3 4 0 4
WEST FALLS CHURCH 3 3 3 4 1 5
SYSTEM TOTAL 21 21 21 28 5 33

Page 75
RAIL OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS
FISCAL 2001
Treasury 2
Revenue 261
Yard 64
Interlocking 33
Gap 19
Utility 10
Training 8
Retraining 8
Spares 49
Start-Up 8
Branch Avenue 12
TOTAL 474
SUMMARY OF OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS

BY LOCATION
RAIL
OPERATORS INTERLOCKING TOTAL
New Carrollton 66 5 71
West Falls Church 54 5 59
Shady Grove 62 5 67
Brentwood 38 5 43
Greenbelt 54 4 58
Alexandria 82 5 87
Glenmont 39 4 43
Training 8 8
Retraining 8 8
Utility 10 10
Start-Up 8 8
Branch Avenue 12 12
TOTAL 441 33 474

Page 76
STATION MANAGER PAY HOURS
FISCAL 2001
EISCAl2000 FISCAL 2001
Scheduled 736,146 777,848 (A)

Mid City Green Line 13,736 (B)
Branch Avenue 18,675
Subtotal Schedule Pay Hours 749,882 796,523
Unscheduled Overtime/Add') Service 52,747 52,747

Extraboard 800 804
Utility 10,200 10,200
Training/Retraining/Recert. 21,847 21,884
Mid-E Training 2,160
Branch Ave Training
Miscellaneous 3,500 3,516
Subtotal Revenue 841,136 885,674
Vacation 94,292 95,867

Sick 31,658 32,187
Holiday 34,806 35,209
Other 1,582 1,589
Subtotal 162,338 164,852
TOTAL 1,003,474 1,050,526
(A) Based on schedules to be effective July 1, 2000

(B) Included in scheduled pay hours

Page 77
STATION MANAGER STAFFING REQUIREMENTS
FISCAL 2001
Position Weekday Saturday Synday Iml Absenteeism
SHAPYGRQVE
Full Time 33 26 26 43 8 51
Semi-Retiree 4 4 4
BRENTWOOP
Full Time 39 28 28 50 7 57
Semi-Retiree 3 3 3
WEST FALLS CHURCH

Full Time 35 26 26 45 7 52
Semi-Retiree 5 5 5
ALEXANDRIA
Full Time 32 26 26 44 7 51
Semi-Retiree 6 6 6
NEW CARROLLTON
Full Time 49 38 38 63 9
Semi-Retiree 5 5 5
GREENBELT
Full Time 40 34 34 54 8 62
Semi-Retiree 9 9 9
GLENMONT
Full Time 25 20 20 35 5 40
Semi-Retiree 4 4 4
SysrEM TOTAL
Full Time 253 198 198 334 51 385
Semi-Retiree 36 36 36
Branch Ave. Full Time 21

Branch Ave. Part Time 2
Training 8
Utility 3
TOTAL 455

Page 78
WMATA PARK AND RIDE
FY 2001 PROJECTED PARKING MANAGEMENT FEE
DISTRIBUTION BY STATION/CASHIER
#of BASEl AVGTRANS FY 2001

STATIONILOT LOT Days SURCHARGE %OFLOT PAY APPROVED
REGION CAP Collected FEE FEE CAPACITY MODE MGMTFEE
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Grosvenor 639 251 1.00 I 1.25 97.5% EXIT $27,826
White Flint 991 251 1.00 I 1.25 65.0% EXIT 79,502
Twinbrook East 843 251 1.00 I 1.25 64.1% EXIT 79,502
Twinbrook West 255 251 1.00 I 1.25 64.0% EXIT 39,751
Rockville 538 251 1.00 I 1.25 90.4% EXIT 31,801
Shady Grove East #1 1,514 251 1.00 I 1.25 80.0% EXIT 68,326
Shady Grove East #2 515 251 1.00 / 1.25 80.0% EXIT 27,826
Shady Grove West 922 251 1.00 / 1.25 80.0% EXIT 55,651
Wheaton 971 251 1.00 I 1.25 22.1% ENTRY 59,626
Forest Glen 588 251 1.00 I 1.25 81.2% EXIT 31,801
Glenmont 1,761 251 1.00 I 1.25 88.5% EXIT 83,477
Silver Spring 715 Monthly 30.00 / 20.00
Wheaton/Amherst 250 Monthly 30.00 I 20.00
Mont. Co. TOTAL 10,502 585,088
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

New carrollton #1 208 251 1.00 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT 27,826
New carrollton #2 357 251 1.00 I 0.50 94.8% EXIT 27.826
New carrollton #3 590 251 1.00 J 0.50 90.0% EXIT 27,826
New Carrollton #4 793 251 1.00 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT 43,726
Landover South 1,185 251 1.25 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT 55,651
Landover North 681 251 1.25 J 0.50 75.0% EXIT 27,826
Cheverly 530 251 1.25 / 0.50 87.3% EXIT 27,826
Addison Road Garage 1,268 251 1.25 / 0.50 90.0% EXIT 63,601
Capitol Heights 373 251 1.25 I 0.50 94.4% ENTRY 19,875
Greenbelt 3,364 251 1.25 I 0.50 74.1% EXIT 143,103
College Park 530 251 1.25 I 0.50 100.0% EXIT 27,826
Prince George's Plaza 1,068 251 1.25 I 0.50 90.0% EXIT 55,651
West Hyattsville 453 251 1.25 I 0.50 64.4% EXIT 27,826
Southem Avenue 1,980 251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT 12,300
Naylor Road 396 251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT 6,150
Suitland 1,890 251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT 12,300
Branch Avenue 3,100 251 1.25 I 0.50 30.0% EXIT 30,750
New carrollton Gar. 400 Monthly 30.00 I 10.00
P.G. Co. TOTAL 19,166 637.888
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Deanwood 194 251 2.00 / 92.0% ENTRY 19,875
Minnesota Avenue 333 251 2.00 I 22.3% ENTRY 19,875
Rhode Island Avenue 342 251 2.00 I 97.4% ENTRY 19,875
Fort Totten 408 251 2.00 I 94.9% ENTRY 19,875
Anacostia 808 251 2.00 I 90.0% EXIT 31,801
D.C. TOTAL 2,085 111,303
NO. VA - FAIRFAX & ARLINGTON COUNTIES, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

Huntington N. Gar. 1,281 251 1.00 I 1.25 88.0% EXIT 47,701
Huntington S. Gar. 885 251 1.00 I 1.25 87.6% EXIT 63.601
Huntington South 924 251 1.00 I 1.25 58.0% EXIT 31,801
West Falls Church 1,064 251 1.25 I 1.00 86.1% EXIT 63,601
Dunn Loring 1,319 251 1.00 I 1.25 86.4% EXIT 63,601
Vienna #1 515 251 1.00 I 1.25 93.4% EXIT 31,801
Vienna North Garage 1,865 251 1.00 J 1.25 89.1% EXIT 95,402
Vienna #3 615 251 1.00 J 1.25 95.4% EXIT 31,801
Vienna South Garage 2,187 251 1.00 I 1.25 89.5% EXIT 46,158
Van Dom Street 361 251 1.87 J 0.38 89.0% EXIT 31.801
East Falls Church 422 251 1.25 I 1.00 89.0% EXIT 31,801
Franconia-Springfield 3,864 251 1.00 I 1.25 40.0% EXIT 159,004
No. VA TOTAL 15,302 698.073
TOTAL 47,055 2,032,352
Carpool Parking Program 12.312
TOTAL 2.044,664

Page 79
This Page Not Used
, ,:

Page 80
METRO ACCESS
• REVENUE
• EXPENSE
• STATISTICS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget -- Metro Access

Page 81
This Page Not Used
('

Page 82
Paratransit Service
Where it Comes From
Gross Subsidy $23.3
Revenues $1.3
Where it Goes
Services $23.6
~~~~::::1 Supplies & Other $0.2

Personnel $0.8
$ Millions

Page 83
REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· METRO ACCESS PARATRANSIT
Fjscal1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Change
REVENUES
Passenger $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5
Total Revenues $406.0 $538.5 $1,346.0 $807.5
EXPENSES
Personnel $433.3 $756.9 $791.2 $34.3
Services 12,496.3 13,573.8 23,527.1 9,953.3
Materials & Supplies 49.9 4.5 18.0 13.5
Fuel & Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Utilities 3.9 3.5 3.3 -0.2
Leases & Rentals 0.0 0.3 200.7 200.4
Miscellaneous 15.0 5.2 57.8 52.6
Total Expenses $12,998.4 $14,344.2 $24,598.2 $10,254.0
GROSS SUBSIDY $12,592.4 $13,805.7 $23,252.2 $9,446.5
Gross Subsidy $12,592.4 $13,805.7 $23,252.2 $9,446.5

Less: Audit Adjustment 0.0 2,039.0 2 010.0
1 -29.0

Page 84
METRO ACCESS PARATRANSIT BUDGET SUMMARY
Full-TIme Salaries 281.0 601.1 676.2 75.1

Temporary Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Part Time Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Salary Lapse 0.0 -4.2 -43.6 -39.4
Overtime Salaries 9.1 0.2 0.2 0.0
Salaries (Total) $290.1 $597.1 $632.8 $35.7
Operator Wages 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Full Time Wages 10.6 7.2 5.3 -1.9
Part TIme Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wage Lapse 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0
Overtime Wages 22.1 0.4 0.4 0.0
Wages (Total) $59.9 $7.5 $5.6 -$1.9
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $350.0 $604.6 $638.4 $33.8
Fringe Benefits 83.3 152.3 152.8 0.5
Other Fringe Benefits 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Workers Compensation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fringes (Total) $83.3 $152.3 $152.8 $0.5
TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $433.3 $756.9 $791.2 $34.3
Management Fee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Professional & Technical 48.7 108.1 91.0 -17.1
Temporary Help 0.0 11.8 35.3 23.5
Contract Maintenance 25.1 25.5 23.7 -1.8
Paratransit 12,400.2 13,384.0 23,273.2 9.889.2
Other 22.2 44.4 103.9 59.5
Services (Total) $12,496.3 $13,573.8 $23,527.1 $9,953.3
Fuel and Lubricants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tires 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 49.9 4.5 18.0 13.5
Materials & Supplies (Total) $49.9 $4.5 $18.0 $13.5
Diesel Fuel 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.1 $0.1
Electricity and Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Utilities - Other 3.9 3.5 3.3 -0.2
Utilities (Total) $3.9 $3.5 $3.3 -$0.2
Insurance 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Claims 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Casualty & Liability (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Property 0.0 0.0 200.0 200.0
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equipment 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.4
Leases (Total) $0.0 $0.3 $200.7 $200.4
Dues And Subscriptions . 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.9

Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 1.4 2.6 41.1 38.5
Miscellaneous (Total) $15.0 $5.2 $57.8 $52.6
Reimbursements 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Reimbursements (Total) $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
TOTAL METRO ACCESSS COST $12,998.4 $14,344.2 $24,598.2 $10,254.0

Page 85
METROACCESS STATISTICS
For the Fiscal Years 1996 Through 2001
FY1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY2000 FY2001

STATISTICS:
Total Number of Registrants 6,305 8,856 10,396 13,850 15,136 15,936
Total Registrant Trips Requested 283,944 356,894 414,986 661,873 897,022 996,294
Contract Carrier· Number of Vehicles 45 51 62 76 80 139
Trips Transmitted to Core Carriers 116,010 130,565 152,619 136,643 148,365 102,804
Trips Completed by Contract Carriers 123,404 202,375 262,367 340,276 509,692 782,861

Page 86
DEBT SERVICE
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget -- Debt Service

Page 87
This Page Not Used

Page 88
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET SUMMARY
DEBT SERVICE
In December 1993, WMATA and the Federal government refinanced $997 million oftransit
revenue bonds issued in the 1970's for construction of the Metrorail Adopted Regional
System. The Authority refinanced its one-third share ($332.3 million) of the original bond
issue by issuing $334,015,000 of gross revenue transit refunding bonds at varying coupon
rates ranging from 2.750/0 to 6.0%.
The terms of the new bond issuance are set forth in the Gross Revenue Transit Bond
Refunding Resolution and Official Statement. The bonds are tax exempt and are not
subject to the federal guarantee in effect on the original issuance. A bond fund has been
established comprised of a principal I sinking fund installment account and a separate
interest account. The bond fund is held in the custody of a trustee, Chemical Bank.
Deposits of bond interest payments provided by local jurisdictions equal to one-fourth of
$27,480,409 must be made into the bond fund on the first business day of each quarter.
If the bond fund is not whole ten days after the beginning of the quarter, WMATA must
make the fund whole by depositing funds from other income sources that are equal to the
shortfall.
The payments required of the jurisdictions in fiscal 2001 will fund the folloWing:
Principal Interest Total Due

Due to Bondholders 1/1/2001 $7,125,000 $6,615,361 $13,740,361
Due to Bondholders 7/1/2001 7.285.000 6.455.048 13.740,048
$14,410,000 $13,070A09 $27,480A09
Applied to future payments 3,785
Total jurisdictional debt service requirement $27.484,194
The debt service payments by the jurisdictions are pledged to the gross revenue transit
refunding bonds. The Authority's gross revenue receipts are subject to lien if the required
payments are not made into the bond fund. The full principal, interest and total annual
debt service requirements are displayed in the follOWing table.

Page 89
DEBT SERVICE
Semi-Annual Amount
Payment Date Principal Interest Payment Due
07/01/94 $4,060,000 $11,009,803 $15,069,803 $15,069,803
($1 330.351)
$13,739.452 *
01/01195 $5,540,000 $8,201,527 $13,741,527
07/01/95 5.630.000 8,111.502 13,741,502 $27.483,029
01/01/96 5,725,000 8,016,496 13,741.496
07/01/96 5.825,000 7,912,014 13,737,014 27,478,510
01/01/97 5,935,000 7,805.708 13,740.708
07/01/97 6,050,000 7,689.976 13,739,976 27.480.684
01/01198 6,165,000 7.572,001 13,737.001
07/01198 6,295,000 . 7,445,618 13,740.618 27,4n.619
01/01/99 6,485,000 7,256,768 13,741,768
07/01199 6,620,000 7,117,341 13,737,341 27,479,109
01/01/00 6,820,000 6,918,741 13,738,741
07/01/00 6,970,000 6,768,701 13,738,701 27.4n.442
01101/01 7,125,000 6,615,361 13,740,361
07101/01 7,285,000 6,455,048 13,740,048 27,480,409
01/01/02 7.450,000 6.291,136 13,741.136
07/01/02 7,620,000 6,119,786 13,739,786 27,480,922
01/01/03 7.795,000 5,944,526 13,739,526
07/01/03 7,980.000 5,761,343 13,741,343 27,480,869
01/01/04 8,165.000 5,573,813 13,738,813
07/01104 8,360,000 5,3n,853 13,737,853 27,476,666
01101105 8,570,000 5,168,853 13,738,853
07/01/05 8,780,000 4.958,888 13,738,888 27,477,741
01/01106 8,995,000 4,743,n8 13,738,778
07/01/06 9,220,000 4,518,903 13,738,903 27,4n,681
01/01/07 9.450,000 4,288,403 13,738,403
07/01107 9,685.000 4,052,153 13,737,153 27,475,556
01/01108 9,980,000 3,761.603 13,741,603
07/01/08 10,235.000 3,505,866 13,740,866 27.482.469
01/01109 10,540,000 3,198,816 13,738,816
07/01/09 10,810,000 2,928,728 13,738.728 27,477,544
01/01/10 11,135,000 2,604,428 13,739,428
07/01/10 11,420.000 2,319.094 13,739,094 27,478,522
01101/11 11,765,000 1,976,494 13,741,494
07/01/11 12,070,000 1,667,663 13,737,663 27,479,156
01101/12 12,390,000 1,350,825 13,740,825
07/01/12 12,715,000 1,025.588 13.740,588 27,481,412
01/01113 7,615,000 691,819 8,306,819
07/01/13 7,405,000 491,925 7,896,925 16,203,743
01/01/14 5,660,000 297,544 5,957,544
07/01/14 5,675,000 148,968 5,823,968 11,781,511
$334,015,000 $203,665,397 $537,680,397 $357,734,201

Outstanding
* Net of $1,330,351.14 accrued interest.

Page 90
PROFESSIONAL AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget -- Professional and Technical Services

Page 91
This Page Not Used

Page 92
PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS
IDOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
FY 2000 FY 2001
OFFICE / ACCOUNT APPROVED APPROVED OPERATING CAPITAL PURPOSE
SECT
Acct./Audit. consultants $150.0 $200.0 $200.0 WMATA annual and management audits.
COUN
Special litigation-outside counsel 500.0 500.0 450.0 50.0 Use of outside counsel as needed basis.
Eng./Arch. consultants 21.9 21.9 3.0 18.9 Adjudication of contract disputes, Army Corps of
Engineers Board of Contract Appeals.
Witness & court fees 328.0 328.0 304.0 24.0 Court expenses (court reporting, witnesses, etc.).
SAFE
Transportation consultants 200.0 200.0 200.0 Safety experts and safety training.
Other consultants 30.0 30.0 30.0 Technical experts.
MTPD
Employment/training 270.2 283.8 283.8 Police training.
Medical consultants 12.0 12.0 12.0 Psychological services for new applicant testing.
Other consultants 1.2 1.2 1.2 Polygraph examinations.
ACCT
Other consultants 335.8 Data warehousing for financial reports.
FIMA
Transportation consultants 375.0 450.0 450.0 Metrobus passenger survey, management analysis.
Computer consultants 187.0 200.0 200.0 Budget system improvements.
Other consultants 48.0 10.0 10.0 Designing budget book.
TRES
Investment consultants 56.0 57.5 57.5 Financial advice on WMATA financial plan.
Other consultants Bond fiscal agent.
RISK
Claims adjusters 1,030.2 1,142.0 1,142.0 Settlement of worker's compensation claims.
Other consultants 1,286.6 1,635.0 1,635.0 Insurance brokers,. worker's compensation support.
Employment/training 24.0 24.0 Insurance related technical training.
BPAD
Transportation consultants 395.0 700.0 700.0 Customer satisfaction survey, new markets evaluation,
and service area usage & consumer awareness research.
Other consultants 855.8 800.0 800.0 Business process reengineering studies, employee
satisfaction study and ITS evaluation.
LAND
Real estate consultants 173.4 200.0 200.0 Joint development, appraisal, survey, marketing
consultants, land surveys.
OPER
Transportation consultants 600.0 100.0 100.0 Operating and maintenance performance studies.
OPAS
Employee training 175.0 175.0 175.0 Scarce skilled technical training.
Transportation consultants 150.0 150.0 150.0 Formal technical apprenticeship program.
ENSP
Eng./Arch. consultants 500.0 400.0 400.0 Adjacent construction engineering evaluations.
Other consultants 70.0 70.0 70.0 Energy management system & power rate
consultants.
OENG
Eng./Arch. consultants 800.0 800.0 Facilities Maintenance Engineering Consulting services.
Stray current surveying.
ADAP
Computer service consultants 35.0 Modifications to Paratransit MIS software.
Transportation consultants 78.0 Paratransit ridership study.
Other consultants 80.0 80.0 Annual demand study to estimate ridership and
customer satisfaction study.

Page 93
PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS
FY 2000 FY 2001
OFFICE / ACCOUNT APPROVED APPROVED OPERATING CAPITAL. PURPOSE
BUSV
Other consultants 1.5 27.1 21.7 Evaluate quality control program.
BTRA
Other consultants 101.5 101.5 Spot checkers for bus operations.
SYSP
Eng.lArch. consultants 30.0 Intelligent transportation system.
Real estate consultants GIS I Ownership maps.
ADMN
Employee Training 30.0 16.0 15.6 0.4 Specialized training for staff development.
Other consultants 75.0 61.4 7.6 Development and implementation of the Authority's
work place violence prevention program.
ffSV
Employment/training 141.0 192.0 192.0 Training of staff on various computer system.
Computer service consultants 257.0 400.0 400.0 Specialist support basic ordering agreement.
ODEV
Employment/training 919.9 1,257.4 1,139.7 111.7 Training for WMATA employees, in-house &. outside.
Other consultants 120.0 118.0 2.0 Specialist to support HR software function.
PROC
Computer Consultants 20.0 15.0 5.0 Support for PIMS system.
Other consultants 340.0 360.0 360.0 Quality control program for quality checks on inventory
items.
HRMP
Medical consultants 414.8 480.0 432.0 48.0 Four part-time physicians, misc. medical service.
Other consultants 675.0 670.0 593.1 76.9 Actuarial services, performance appraisal, drug
testing.
LASR
Other consultants 307.9 414.0 372.6 41.4 Labor legal services, arbitration, court reporting services.
CIVR
Other consultants 200.0 175.0 175.0 Technical assistance to DBE firms.
.COM
Other consultants 450.0 200.0 200.0 Communications research and development,
MREL
Employment/training 2.0 2.0
Other consultants 12.0 192.0 192.0 Media training for senior staff.
GOVR
Other consultants 75.0 175.0 115.0 Government legislative consultants.
STRK
Computer service consultants 123.0 123.0 Web page design and maintenance. Metro system
route maps & Bus stop information.
Other consultants 251.0 251.0 Sales commission for outsourcing Metrocheck.
CSCV
Computer service consultants . 40.0 65.0 65.0 Upgrade ARTS &. data base.
TOTAL WMATA $11,758.2 $13,887.0 $13,320.1 $666.9

Page 94
UNION
STATISTICS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget - Union Statistics

Page 95
This Page Not Used
,.
Operating BUdget - Union Statistics

Page 96
UNION STATISTICS
The fiscal 2001 budget contains 9,419 authorized positions of which 84% or 7,908 are
members of the five union locals on the property, representing employees loosely
categorized by job function. Two of these locals represent the hourly wage work force, one
local represents a portion of the professional and administrative work force, and two other
locals cover the police and security positions. The remaining classifications of
administrative and management employees are not covered by union contracts.
The following terms are widely used to describe the various unions and employees at
WMATA:
Hourly (Wage) Employee Unions:

Local 689 Amalgamated Transit Union, (except Landover hourly).
Local 922 Teamsters Union at Landover Bus Garage.
Salary Employee Unions:

Local 2 Office and Professional Employees International Union.
Local 246 Teamsters representing Transit Police Officers.
Local2246 Teamsters representing Special Police Officers.
Non-Represented Employees (Le., not represented by a union):

Salaried positions in the management, administrative, supervisory orclerical
work force that have been exempted from union participation.
FY 2001
Union Category Positions Distribution
Local 689 . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6,580 69.86%
Local 922 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370. . . . . . . . .. 3.93%
Union Wage Subtotal .. 6,950 . . . . . . . .. 73.790/0
Local 2 622 . . . . . . . . .. 6.600/0

Local 246 271 2.88°A,
Local 2246 -2§ . . . . . . . . .. 0.69%
Union Salaried Subtotal .. 958 . . . . . . . . .. 9.860/0
Union Subtotal .. . . . . . .. 7,908 . . . . . . . .. 83.960/0
Non-Union 1,511 16.04%
Total Positions . . . . . . . .. 9,419 . . . . . . . . . . . 100 %

Page 97
Average Pay By Union Category:
L-689 & L-922 $49,900
L-2 $58,900
L-246 $55,000
L-2246 $31,500
IIPay" includes all base, progressions, overtime, vacation, sick, holiday, shift and differential pay.
Average Fringe Benefit Cost and Ratios by Position, for each Union:
L-689 & 922 . . . . . . .. $11,900 per staff year or 230/0 of pay
L-2 $12,300 per staff year or 20% of pay
L-246 $19,400 per staff year or 37°t'o of pay
L-2246 . . . . . . . . . .. $6,600 per staff year or 230/0 of pay
"Fringe Benefits" include health insurance, retirement, payroll taxes, life and disability insurance.
Annual Average Pay by Job Category: . . . . . . . . .. Without Fringe With Fringe

Bus Operator (L-689 & L-922) $49,300 $60,600
Bus Mechanic (L-689 & L-922) $50,700 $62,400
Train Operator (L-689) $58,200 $71,600
Station Manager (L-689) $52,400 $64,500
Rail Mechanic (L-689) $52,900 $65,100
* Non-Op (L-689 & L922) $49,400 $60,800
Salaried (L-2) $58,900 $70,700
Police (L-246) $55,000 $75,400
Hourly Rates of Pay by Job Category: New Hire Rate Senior Rate
Bus Operator (L689 & L922) $11.31 $22.11
Bus Mechanic (L689 & L922) $8.82 $24.76
Train Operator (L-689) $11.31 $22.11
Station Manager (L-689) $10.74 $21.00
Rail Mechanic $8.82 $24.76
These are the hourly pay rates in effect at the beginning of the fiscal year.
* Note: flOp" and "Non-Op" wage positions.

The three position classifications of Bus Operator, Train Operator and Station Manager are
referred to as Op positions. They are budgeted based on the daily operating schedules for
Metrobus and Metrorail. Bus Operator and Station Manager positions can be either full-
time or part-time.
Non-Op refers to any wage position other than Bus Operator, Train Operator or Station
Manager. Non-Op positions are budgeted by work location based on shift assignments
and work levels at each facility in the Metro system.

Page 98
FRINGE BENEFITS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Operating Budget - Fringe Benefits

Page 99
This Page Not Used

Page 100
FRINGE BENEFITS
Fringe benefit costs at WMATA comprise the normal business expenses incurred by an
employer that are above and beyond the cost of employee pay. WMATA's fringe
benefits are comprised of the insurance and retirement plans required to attract and
maintain a large professional workforce, plus government mandated costs such as
unemployment insurance, workers' compensation coverage and payroll taxes.
All fringe benefits at WMATA fall into one of three categories of cost. The first category
is allocated fringe benefits, which are calculated on an Authority-wide basis and then
charged out to all offices and all modes for reporting purposes. Health insurance, life
insurance, and pension costs are all examples of allocated fringe benefits. These fringe
benefit expenses are allocated to each office based upon the budgeted payroll per
office and then allocated by mode based on the budgeted payroll by mode. The fiscal
2001 total budget for allocated fringe benefits is $113.7 million.
Second, unallocated fringe benefits (also referred to as "other" fringe benefits) are
budgeted by office in amounts specific to the needs of each office. These "other"
fringes are typically things such as meal reimbursements for employees working beyond
their regular hours, tool allowances and costs for work uniforms. Detail on the $3.4
million fiscal 2001 total for this expense is made available in each office budget where
this cost occurs.
The third category of fringe benefit expense is workers' compensation cost. The fiscal
2001 budget requirement of $5.6 million is largely determined by actuarial analysis and
governmental requirements. This line item expense is budgeted in the Office of Risk
Management.
In total for fiscal 2001, fringe benefit costs are:
Allocated Fringe Benefits $113,739,800

Other Fringe Benefits 3,421,300
Workers' Compensation 5.635,800
Total Fringe Benefits $122.796,900

Page 101
PERSONNEL AND FRINGE BENEFITS BY UNION
AFLoCIO Local 246 Local 2246 AFLoClO

OPIEU Transit Special SALARY ATU Teamsters HOURLY AUTHORITY
Non-llnion Local·2 Police Police TOTAL Local-689 Local·922 TOTAL TOTAL
POSITIONS:
Full Time 1,511 615 271 65 2,462 6,297 303 6,600 9,062
Part Time 0 7 nla nla 7 283 67 350 357
1,511 622 271 65 2,469 6,580 370 6,950 9.419
FULL·TIME EQUIVALENTS:
Full Time 1,512.39 645.10 271.00 65.00 2,493.49 6,247.92 300.00 6,547.92 9,041.41
Part Time 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 3.50 138.24 33.50 171.74 175.24
1,512.39 648.60 271.00 65.00 2,496.99 6,386.16 333.50 6,719.66 9,216.65
PAYROLL COSTS:
Full Time Pay $96,256,139 $37,066,801 514,787,103 $2,005,109 $150,115,152 $314,943.421 515,448,439 $330,391,860 $480,507,012
Part Time Pay $127,500 $127,500 $6,885,500 S1,286,500 $8,172,000 $8,299,500
Overtime Pay $1,255,800 $2,686,704 $1,079,300 $109,900 $5,131,704 $15.004.311 $264,037 $15,268,348 $20.400,052
Less: Turnover Savings ($5,118,300) ($1,971,000) ($786,300) ($106,600) (S7,982,167) ($7.234.874) ($165,411) ($7.400,285) ($15.382.452)
Budgeted Payroll S92,393,639 537,910.005 $15,080,103 52.008,409 $147,392.189 $329,598.358 $16.833,565 $346.431,923 $493,824,112
ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS

Budgeted By Position:
CIGNAPPO 54,771,000 $1.807.400 $6,578,400 $6,578.400
Kaiser Permanente $1,992,800 51,001.300 $156,100 $3,150,200 SO $3,150,200
GW Health Plan $678,300 5377,800 $79,700 $1,135,800 $0 $1,135.800
Blue Cross $206,900 $1.862,100 $2,069.000 $0 $2,069,000
Health Trusts $0 $44,509,700 $2,379,200 $46,888,900 546,888,900
Dental $315,100 $132,600 $30,100 $477,800 $0 $477,800
Retiree Health $1,814,800 $747,000 $2.561,800 $4,538,000 $250.800 $4,788,800 $7,350,600
Health Insurance 59,778,900 $4,066,100 $1.862,100 $265,900 $15,973,000 549,047,700 $2,630.000 $51,677,700 $67,650,700
Budgeted By Payroll:
FICA Taxes $6,652,300 $2,729.500 $1,085.800 5153.600 S1 0,621,200 $25,049,500 $1,279,400 $26,328,900 $36.950,100
Defined Benefit Pensions SO SO $2,314,200 $0 $2,314,200 $0 S1.262,500 $1,262,500 $3,576,700
Defined Contribution Pensions $819,000 $336,000 $1.155,000 $1,155,000
Life Insurance $434,000 $180,700 $93,700 $8,200 $716,600 $0 $716,600
Long Term Disability $548,500 $237,000 $1,800 59,300 $796,600 $2.472,000 $2,472,000 $3,268.600
Accident Insurance $0 $15,100 $6.300 $700 $22,100 $0 $22,100
Unemployment $74,800 $30.700 $12,200 $1,600 $119,300 $267.100 $13,600 $280,700 $400,000
Taxes I Pension I Other $8,528,600 $3,529,000 $3,514,000 $173.400 $15,745,000 527,788,600 $2,555,500 $30.344,100 $46,089,100
ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS $18,307,500 $7,595,100 $5,376,100 $439,300 $31.718,000 $76,836,300 $5,185.500 $82.021,800 $113,739,800
Unallocated Fringe Benefits S548,800 $225,900 $98.400 $23,600 $896,700 $2.390.100 $134,400 $2,524,500 $3,421,300
Workers' Compensation $1,054,400 $432.700 5172.100 $22,900 $1,682,100 $3,761.600 $192,100 $3,953,700 $5.635,800
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS: $122.796,900
Allocated Fringe Benefits

Budgeting Rates:
Average Annual Pay 561,100 $58,400 $55,600 $30,900 $59.000 $51,600 $50,500 $51.600 $53.600
Full Frinae Rate 20% 20% 36% 22% 22% 23"1. 31% 24% 23%
Variable Cost on Pavroll 10.4% 10.5% 24.4% 9.8% 11.8% 9.60/. 16.3% 9.9% 10.5%
Fixed Cost Per F.T.E. $6,500 S6,300 $6,900 $4.100 $6,400 $7,700 $7,900 $7,700 $7,300

Page 102
INFRASTRUCTURE
RENEWAL
PROGRAM
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Page 103
This Pa~e Not Used

Page 104
FISCAL 2001 • 2006 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority maintains and operates the second
largest rail and fourth largest bus system in America, measured in terms of ridership.
Metro provides intermodal bus and rail transportation for residents ofthe metropolitan area
as well as visitors to the nation's capital from across the country and around the world.
A sizable capital investment has been made by Federal, state and local governments to
provide such a system and care must be taken to ensure that this investment is maintained
to the highest standard so that it continues to provide safe, clean, reliable, and comfortable
service.
The adopted Fiscal 2001 - 2006 Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) has been
developed to reflect several changes that have occurred within the last year. The program
excludes any system expansion element, and provides only a limited amount of system
enhancements as assets are replaced, thus the name IRP truly reflects the nature of the
program. The program is consistent with the Inter-jurisdictional Funding Agreement
through fiscal 2003, Board Guidance and the Independent Consultant's recommendations.
The fiscal 2001 program is approved for implementation and the fiscal 2002-2006 program
is approved for planning purposes.
The program is driven by the need to rehabilitate and replace rolling stock which accounts
for 720/0 of the funds required in the approved fiscal 2001 program. Major projects
approved in fiscal 2001 include the procurement of rail cars, the rehabilitation of the Breda
cars, the continuing need for escalator overhaul and elevator rehabilitation, the
acceleration of escalator canopy installation, station enhancement and parking lot
rehabilitation. New projects include the lease/purchase of the Pennsy Drive Facility to
meet maintenance and training needs, and the inclusion of Information Technology
projects under one focused program. The Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program
(ERRP), adopted by the Board on April 22, 1999 continues in it's second year. This plan
will reduce passenger off-loads and delays, stabilize critical system components, address
targeted facility deficiencies that are highly visible to customers and ensure that the core
system can adequately support future growth.
FUNDING LEVELS
The funding for the adopted Fiscal 2001 - 2006 CIP totals $1,495 million, including
financing. This reflects the levels of funding contained in the program approved by the
Board last year, additional Federal funds, $24.9 million from prior years reprogrammed
Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Overview

Page 105
funds in fiscal 2001 and the one year extension through fiscal 2006. The sequencing of
the projects results in obligations and expenditures exceeding available funding in some
years. To accommodate this, the program includes the use of a loan guarantee up to $600
million under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998
(TIFIA). The Board is currently re-examining the out-year funding needs of the IRP in
Fiscal 2006 and beyond, the projected ridership increases, the required vehicles and the
facilities needed to accommodate this growth from fiscal 2001-2025. These findings will
be considered dUring the preparation of the next IRP.
Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Overview

Page 106
:J
~
""'1
Q)
en
FY 2001 - 2006
..,
r-+
C
(")
rl
...,
C
Funding and Requirements
CD
:JJ
CD
::l
CD
~
Q)
Funding Reguirements
..,
"U
o by Fund Source by CateQQ.Q!
..,
CO
m
3
System $103.5 ---7
Passenger
Facilities $210.1------1'
""U
0)
co
CD ITotal $1494.91 $ in millions
I
Total $1494.91
o
"" ;'Chart 1
--o-
w :::J
CO=:'
CD Q)
en
FY 2001
~,.....
02
000 ,...
c
-,
Funding and Requirements
CD
:D.
CD
:::J
(1)
:E
Q)
Funding Requirements
"'U
-, by Fund Source by Category
o
co
..,
Q)
Rolling Stock -Rail $445.4W
3 .----~--
Passenger
Facilities $39.4
System $37.2
If\Information
LTechnology$22.9
Program Management J Rolling Stock -Bus $44.5

and Support $4.2
Tracks & Structures $13.4
1Total $677.31 ITotal $677.31

$ in millions
1<,' - .;
i'::'(~hart>2 .
~. .
:::J TABLE NO. 1
...,
-t..
FY 2001 • 2006
Q)
en
.....
..,
C
0 Pro ram be ond FY 06 Is for Information onl
rl
C DEstRU~tioN FY01 FV02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06 TOTAL. FY07 FY08 FY08 ::FY10'- TOTAL TOTAL
.., FY01008. FY01·10 FY01..10
CD
:n ROLLING STOCK: BUS
CD
::::J BUS REPLACEMENT 34.270 20,843 21.328 38,386 20.38D 19,543 152.548 152,548
CD
TOTAL 34,270 20,643 21.328 38,386 20.380 152,148 38,389
~
18.543 43780 51.882 57,922 188883 342,511
OJ
ROLLIHG STOCK: RAIL
..,
"'0
0 EMERGENCY RAIL REHABILITATION 10,300 3,800 2,500 0 0 0 18,800 16.800
CO RAILCAR ENHANCEMENTS 1,858 1,858 897 484 484 0 5,337 5,337
RAIL CAR PURCHASE 0
~
Q)
RAIL CAR REHABIUTATION
24,000
398.2;2 ~ ~
0 0
_ _ _0_
0
_ _ _0_ °0 24,000
409,230
24,000
409,230
3 TOTAL 434,448 11.125 8,888 484 484 0 455.167 3393 ----!.!!!.. ~ ----l.lli.... 22648 477,815
::n
::J
PASSENGER FACIU11ES
Q) ESCALATOR REHABIUTATIONIMAINTENANCE 6,783 37,823
t10 14,727 11,736 11,500 83.259 83,259
::::J ELEVATOR REHABIUTATION 2,257 749
748 749 749 1,700 8,953 8,953
0 ESCALATOR CANOPIES 8,230 8,500
8,500 0 0 0 26,230 28,230
OJ STAnONENHANCEMENTPROGRAM 8,324 4,817
4.808 4,906 4.808 4,900 32,759 32.759
PARKING lOT REHABIUTATION 8.608 6,243
4,130 4,646 2.894 3,033 27,654 27.654
-i MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION ----!J!!... ~ ~ ~ 5.807 5.720 33.228 33,228
D)
0- TOTAL 39,356 62,887 24,173 30.522 ~ 28,853 210,083 34136 ~ 29,930 ~ 129757 339,840
CD
(JJ
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
RAIUBUS STRUCT. FIELD BASES. YARDS & SHOPS 7,333

13.907 7,333 7.333 7.333 7.380 50,829 50,629
REPAIRABLES 5,000
5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 30,000
BUSIRAIL SUPPORT eQUIPMENT 7,981
9,851 10,731 10,852 10,851 11.000 61,146 61,148
SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE 3,985
247 247 247 0 0 4,728 4.728
PENNSY DRIVE FACILITY 0
38.000 0 0 0 0 38,000
RAIL WORK EQUIPMENTILOCOMOTIVES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.205 23,342 23,342
TOTAL 70,341 25.819 ~ 27,491 -.!!m... 27.595 205,843 22.843 26,583 25,854 28,145 103935 308,778
SYSTEMS
COMPREHENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM 1,124 2.000 0 0 0 0 3,124 3.124

ATC AND POWER SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT 11,555 9,854 10,794 10,448 9,923 10.100 82.474 62,474
UPSlElECTRICAL SYSTEMS REHABIUTATlON 2,804 2,584 2,598 2.504 2,440 2.410 15,140 15,140
_ _ _0_ _ _ _0_ _ _ _0_
BUS FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ~ ----!!!.. 0 22.785 22.185
-U
m TOTAL 37,185 ~ 13,392 ~ ~ 12.510 103.533 24538 ~ 32.262 35.861 123775 227,308
CC
CD
~
0
CD
-u-
Q)::J TABLE NO.1
(Q~ FY 2001 • 2006
mOl
CI)
-ol ..,
.-+
-ole:
00
.-+
Pr ram be ond FY 06 Is for Information onl
e DESCRIPTION .FY.01 FYI2 FY03 FY04 FYO~,.:f\; FY08. .;TOTAL FY07' FY08 " FYOO' ·j:y~10
' .
'_TOTAL T()TAL
~ "'01-08 FY07~10 Pfoi:io
CD
::JJ
CD TRACK AND STRUCTURES
::J
en ROW TRACK AND STRUCTURES REHABIUTATION 11,592 12,938 8,376 8,376 8,376 8,300 57,958 51,958
~ STATION lUNNEL LEAK MmGATION ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,834 1.800 10,970 10,870
Q)
TOTAL 13,428 14,772 ~ ~ 10,210 10,100 88,828 22528 23.288 ~ 28,745 100778 169,708
-U
....,
0 INFORMA1l0N TECNNHNOLOGY 1m
co
..,
Q)
INFORMAnoN TECHNOLOGY 22,126 17,755 ~ ~ 8,328 3.018 80.541 60,141
3 TOTAL 22.928 11.755 ~ ~ 8,328 3,018 80,541 4758 ----M!!.... ~ ----!.!!L 17B90 78,431
JJ
::s
Q)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT
::J
0
oi' PROGRAM ADMINISTRAnON 2,700
_ _ _0_
2,800 3,200 3,60D 4.000 4,000 20,400 20,400
CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP) 11 ~ ~ ~ 8,000 8,000 41.000 41,ODO
-f
OJ TOTAL ~ 10.900 12.200 ~ 12,000 12,000 61,400 14433 --.!!J!!!... 17.493 ~ 61168 128,568
c-
CD 20,700 124,815
en PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ~ 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700 124.815
TOTAL 21,115 20.700 20,700 20.700 20,700 20,700 124.615 20700 20,700 20,700 20,700 82800 207.415
FINANCiNG COSTS
TOTAL ~ 8.700 11,400 13,800 13,600 5,200 52,200 7490 ----L!!!... ----!.!!L ~ 21309 73.509
GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS 877,267 208.532 155,572 188,404 151,564 137,518 1,414,858 188,615 203.416 218,782 241,150 860,023 2.354.881
PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING 21 195,855 191,100 215.100 240,100 285,100 285,100 1,372,455 265100 285,100 285,100 285,100 1080 00 2.432.855
FINANCING (PAYBACK) 481,312 15.432 (58,528) -!!!.!!!l. (113,538) (127.IB1) 122.403 6e425 ~ (48,318) (23.950) 00377 (71.914) 31
Notes:
1/IAWP estimate for Fiscal 2001 of $18.1 miJlion has been allocated and induded in the above projects,
2J FY 2001lndudes additional runds or $24.9 million from reprogrammed funds.
31 ThIs amount will be applied as payback for Fiscal 2000.
I , ,
~ WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

~
-,
Q) TABLE NO.2
en
r-+ FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2001·20061RP
-,
c (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
(")
r-+
C
-,
il
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 TOTALS
(FED 00) (FED 01) (FED 02) (FED 03) (FED 04) (FED 05)
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,10~ 215,100 240,100 265,100 265,100 1,372.455
CD
~
~I TO BE FUNDED BY:
-0
O.
co
REPROGRAMMED FUNDING 24,944 24.944
-,
!I.
SECTION 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS 78.782 78.924 84,803 90.738 90.738 90,738 514,723
20% LOCAL MATCHING CONTRIBU'nON FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS 19,696 19,730 21.200 22,684 22,684 22,684 128.678
::J
~ SECTION 5309 RAIL MODERNIZATION GRANTS 44,654 53,558 61,599 70,628 70,628 70,628 311,695
(")
-.
iii
-I
W
20% MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS 11,164 13,390 15,400 17,651 11.651 11,651 92,925
2:.
CD
BUSIRAIL REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 1,500 1,500 1.500 1,500 0 0 6,000
en I
LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
ADDITIONAL LOCAL FUNDING 2,161 10,944 11,544 23,839 50,339 50,339 155,166
FEDERAL TEA·21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT) _.8.0~ .1.054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8,054 48.324
TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,100 215,100 240,100 285,100 265.100 1,372,455
FINANCING/(PAYBACK) ~'I.31Z 15.432 (59,528) (73,696) (113,536) (127,581) 122,403
"U
Q)
. TOTAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING 877,287 208,532 155,572 186,404 151,564 137,519 1.494.858
co
CD
........
........
-oJ.
INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Bus Procurement
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of older buses and will ensure safe and continued
service to the Washington Metropolitan Area. Fiscal 2001 funds the replacement of
approximately 100 forty foot buses.
JUSTIFICATION:
The current average age of the WMATA bus fleet is 6.6 years. FTA's new bus
specifications suggest a bus average age of 6 years with a bus life expectancy of 12 years.
However, a mid-life bus overhaul program is extending the life of Metrobuses to 15 years.
This will allow for a reduction in new bus procurements, while maintaining a bus fleet that
is efficient and provides a high level of service to customers.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
$ In Thousands I Total: $152,548 I
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FY06
Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Project Descriptions

Page 112
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds acceleration of rail car reliability and major maintenance programs.
Included in the program are accelerated major maintenance and interim rehabilitation of
rail friction brakes, rail car doors, car bodies, wayside equipment, communications, rail car
couplers, HVAC systems, battery systems and propulsion systems. Also included are
engineering action teams to focus on resolving rail car problems, accelerating maintenance
and rehabilitation activities, supporting resolution of critical ATC issues and identifying and
resolving train control vital relay issues. This project will also fund acceleration of the
Breda rehabilitation program, consolidation of a seven year floating slab repair program
into four years and additional maintenance efforts on escalators. Fiscal 2001 funds the
continuation of rail car rehabilitation, engineering, and core capacity studies.
JUSTIFICATION:
In 1999, operational issues on Metrorail highlighted the need to advance critical

maintenance projects that will address performance related problems. The Board directed
that the General Manager prepare a plan in response to the current emergency on
Metrorail that identified the most urgently needed repairs that could significantly correct and
improve the reliability of the rail system. This plan was approved by the Board on April 22,
1999. This plan includes immediate, near-term and longer term elements to maximize
rapid implementation in a way that will contribute to tangible and immediate benefits for rail
operations while addressing other issues that could affect future system performance.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $16,600
Sin Thousands
o o D
FYD1 FY02 FYD3 FY04 FYD5 FYD8

Page 113
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Enhancements
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the retrofit or replacement of rail car related equipment that will improve
the accessibility, safety, diagnostic capability, maintenance, appearance and reliability of
the rail car fleet.
JUSTIFICATION:
Recent technological advances in rail crash worthiness, accessibility and diagnostic

capabilities have made it possible to improve the performance of the existing rail car fleet.
Fiscal 2001 funds inter-car barriers.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $5,337
$In Thousands
o
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06

Page 114
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Purchase
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the purchase of additional rail cars in Fiscal 2001 to meet estimated
ridership levels.
JUSTIFICATION:
This is the first purchase of rail cars in the Infrastructure Renewal Program. The cars are
needed to meet planned passenger volumes in the 103 mile system when the last segment
to Branch Avenue is opened in early 2001. Without these cars, a shortage would exist and
cause challenges in meeting scheduled service.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $24,000
$ In Thousands
24,000
o o o o o
Infrastructure Renewal Program -- Project Descriptions·

Page 115
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
This project will enhance rail car reliability with the mid-life overhaul of 364 Breda cars
including propulsion, brake, door controls, signs, interior, truck, heating, ventilation and air
conditioning, lighting, communications, high voltage and control cables systems/equipment.
Fiscal 2001 funds the award of the four year Breda overhaul contract.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Breda car overhaul includes the replacement ofthe DC propulsion system with an AC
drive system which will result in lower maintenance costs for the remaining life of the cars.
Substantial power savings may be derived from the regenerative braking system. In
addition, the friction brake hydraUlic, pneumatic and electronic control systems and door
system components are nearing the end of their useful life. This rehabilitation must be
performed to avoid the additional maintenance caused by worn out parts and electrical
system degradation.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
$ In Thousands
I Total: $409.230 I
&.489 o o o

Page 116
FY 2001· 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Rehabilitation/Maintenance
DESCRIPTION:
This project provides funding for the following:
• escalator maintenance,
• escalator rehabilitation.
These projects will fund the maintenance and the rehabilitationlreplacement of escalators.
A contract will provide funds for escalator work at 21 stations. The escalator rehabilitation
includes the rehabilitation and code upgrade of the Westinghouse modular escalators
beginning with the oldest and poorest performing equipment in the highest use stations,
the installation of a comb plate and impact detectors, the relocation of emergency stop
switches, and the installation of equipment to automatically report all escalator faults to the
maintenance control center. Fiscal 2001 funds contract maintenance labor and material
required to maintain the escalators at 70 stations, and the rehabilitation of 26 escalators
in 10 stations.
JUSTIFICATION:
The escalator overhaul/rehabilitation program is the result of a detailed staff investigation,

system wide inspection effort and contractor study to identify needed enhancement and
rehabilitation to prevent deterioration and to improve the reliability and safety of the
escalator system.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $83,259
$ In Thousands
37.623
910
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FY08

Page 117
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Elevator Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the rehabilitationlreplacement of WMATA elevators. It includes three

elements. 1) The rehabilitation ofthe elevators that have exceeded their useful life or have
deteriorated beyond economic repair. This element includes: durable stainless steel cabs,
enhanced ventilation systems, installation of energy efficient fluorescent light fixtures,
refurbished elevator housings and sill structures, and installation of state-of-the-art
controllers and motor systems. The integrity of hydraulic pistons and cylinders will be
tested and replaced as required. 2) Upgrade of 110 elevators in key stations to bring the
units into conformance with current ADA requirements. 3) The installation of equipment
to automatically report all elevator faults to maintenance control. Fiscal 2001 funds the
rehabilitation of 11 elevators in 6 stations, the beginning of the exception reporter
installation on 83 elevators and the ADA upgrade on 60 elevators.
JUSTIFICATION:
Normal and abnormal use, as well as vandalism has caused the deterioration of elevators
in the rail system. Elevator rehabilitation of major systems must be accomplished because
of high failure rates which result in elevator downtime. The modernization effort must also
be accomplished to assure that system elevators meet ADA code requirements and that
all equipment failures are identified, promptly reported and addressed.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
S In Thouaanda
I Total: $6,953

Page 118
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Canopies
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds design and installation of canopies with lighting at various locations.
Included in the project will be waterproofing and repair of structures surrounding exterior
escalators. Approximately 53 escalators are exposed to the elements and will be covered
by canopies over the next several years.
JUSTIFICATION:
Covering outside escalators will reduce maintenance to escalators due to weather damage
and minimize customer complaints.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
$In Thousands
I Total: $26.230 I
o o o

Page 119
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Station Enhancement Program
DESCRIPTION:
• station sign initiative,

• station enhancements,
• customer communication initiative.
This project funds the upgrade of existing signage at Metrorail facilities and the
enhancement and restoration of rail stations. This project includes the rehabilitation,
replacement and installation ofconcrete structures, granite edge stones, paver quarry tiles,
sidewalks, elastomeric roof coatings, metal gratings, stairwells, stairways, platform
shelters, doors, hatches, exterior lighting, station signage and graphics. Fiscal 2001 funds
major and mini enhancements at 14 rail stations and the procurement of variable message
signs, bus route maps and vending machines.
JUSTIFICATION:
The station structures are aging and must be rehabilitated. Vaulted ceiling spalling and
deteriorated concrete has to be repaired to maintain structural integrity. Surface station
elastomeric roofing replacement is necessary to prevent accelerated deterioration. Station
walkways must be maintained to provide an adequate and safe environment for our
patrons. Station signage renewal is needed to ensure patron information is clear and well
designed. Enhanced customer communications continues to be a priority.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total: $32,759 I
$ In Thousands
8,324

Page 120
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Parking Lot Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the rehabilitation of asphalt pavement, curbs, curbs/gutter, and
sidewalks; drainage systems, signage, electrical wiring/conduits, pavement
marking/striping, structures, station access roadways/bus bays, and parking lot equipment
such as lot full signs and cashier booths.
JUSTIFICATION:
The parking facilities are deteriorating due to weathering and normal wear and tear. Some
of the facilities have been in operation for over 24 years. The asphalt paving, concrete
sidewalks/roadways, and bus loops have deteriorated and require rehabilitation in order
to maintain safe and reliable service. Parking facilities/equipment requires periodic
rehabilitation to ensure safety of operation and reliability of revenue collection.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $27,654
$ In Thousands
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FYOI

Page 121
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Mechanical Systems Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
This project prOVides funding for the following:
• station and tunnel rehabilitation,

• fire system rehabilitation,
• station chiller rehabilitation,
• drainage pumping/sewer rehabilitation.
These projects include rehabilitation and replacement ofaging and deteriorated equipment
including ventilation equipment, standpipes and sprinklers, and electrical systems. Fiscal
2001 activities include the replacement of 4 chillers, cooling towers, drainage pumping
stations, and the installation of ventilation equipment.
JUSTIFICATION:
It is vital to replace tunnel ventilation systems, meet National fire code mandates requiring
installation ofnew fire suppression systems, and to maintain mechanical systems to ensure
that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total: $33,228
$ In Tbousands
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FYOB

Page 122
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Rail/Bus Structures, Field Bases, Yards and Shops
DESCRIPTION:
• environmental assessment,
• emergency construction,
• rail structures, field bases, yards and shops.
These projects include design, installation, replacement and upgrade of equipment to

ensure environmental regulatory compliance of bus and rail facilities, the continuation of
emergency repairs and other construction/improvements, and a variety of rehabilitation to
facilities including masonry, door replacement, sidewalk and roadway repairs, and roof
replacement. Fiscal 2001 funds emergency construction and repair, procurement of
pollution control equipment, paving, storage tank replacement and water separator
replacement.
JUSTIFICATION:
The replacement of equipment is necessary to meet regulatory standards and ensure

timely repairs to facility roofs, roadways, and interiors to maintain a safe environment for
employees and to protect vital equipment.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $50,629
$ In Thousands
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FYOS

Page 123
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Repairables
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of repairable parts for rail cars, facilities, systems
equipment, bus parts and major components which are beyond economic repair and
increases in repairable parts inventories when required to support system expansion,
increased mileage of the fleets, and effective scheduling of the bus overhaul program.
Fiscal 2001 funds the continued support of repairable parts inventories.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project funds the procurement of repairable parts which are vital components of
WMATA's bus and rail system. Adequate quantities of parts are required to perform
corrective and preventative maintenance, and overhauls. The funding is provided by 100%
local jurisdiction contributions.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $30,000
$ In Thousands

Page 124
INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWALPROGRAM
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Bus/Rail Support Equipment
DESCRIPTION:
• non-revenue vehicles,
• miscellaneous support equipment-other offices,
• misc. bus support equipment,
• misc. rail support equipment,
• bus lifts/bus work equipment,
• bus washer rehabilitation,
• rail car washer rehabilitation.
Types of equipment to be rehabilitated or replaced include non-revenue vehicles, shop

equipment, test equipment, work equipment, major components for buses, overhead
cranes, compressors, lifts, jacks, drills, brake testers, brake lathes, chasis washers and
dynamometers, and car washing enhancements at all five rail car wash locations. Fiscal
2001 funds the replacement of bus lift systems and the continued support of repairable
parts inventories, the procurement of non-revenue vehicles and various testing and shop
equipment.
JUSTIFICATION:
The replacement of support equipment is critical to the day-to-day operating and

administrative functions of Metrobus and Metrorail operations. Bus work equipment and
bus lift enhancements are needed to maintain the reliability of Metrobus service and
provide for an effective maintenance program.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $61,146
$ In Thousands
FV01 FV02 FVD3 FY04 FY05 FY08

Page 125
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Southeast Bus Garage
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the rehabilitation of the existing, out-dated Southeastern Metrobus
Garage which is necessary to provide a bus maintenance, operation and storage facility.
The rehabilitation will be completed within site constraints and environmental
considerations. A more modern facility will ensure reliable and efficient bus service to the
Southeast area of the District of Columbia and Southern Prince George's County. Fiscal
2001 work includes the award of a contract to rehabilitate the building.
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing facility is more than 60 years old and is in poor condition. It has a capacity
for 100 buses, although it currently houses 129. Southeastern division is one of the better
located garages in relation to the service area and scheduling efficiency. However, the
physical condition ofthe building has deteriorated to a point where it is impacting employee
morale and compromising the reliability of service operated from this garage.
Rehabilitation will be less costly than replacement.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $4,726
$ In Thousands
247 247 247

o o

Page 126
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Pennsy Drive Facility
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the lease/purchase of a training and maintenance facility, known as the
Pennsy Drive Facility. Fiscal 2001 funds lease/purchase costs, including renovation.
JUSTIFICATION:
Over the years the training and maintenance facilities required to keep pace with the
expansion of bus and rail service has not been adequate. An opportunity exists to
lease/purchase a facility to house major functions of the Authority.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $36,000
o o o o o

Page 127
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Rail Work Equipment/Locomotives
DESCRIPTION:
• rail work equipment rehabilitation,

• locomotives and prime movers.
These projects fund the design and rehabilitation of all major shop equipment located in
the rail car maintenance shops including overhead cranes, rail train lifts and hoists,
industrial shop air compressors, equipment service elevators and hoisting mechanisms,
as well as self-propelled rail work equipment and rehabilitation and replacement of
locomotives, deicer cars, flat cars and specialty cars. Fiscal 2001 funds the replacement
of cranes and overhaul/repair of lifts and the replacement of 2 prime movers.
JUSTIFICATION:
The replacement of shop equipment and the replacement of heavy work equipment is
necessary to maintain rail car service reliability.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $23,342
$ In Thousands
FY01 FY02 FY03 FYD4 FY05 FY06

Page 128
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Comprehensive Radio System
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the 1) Infrastructure backbone for a new integrated communications
system that will serve the needs of all WMATA users, and 2) Integration of new Transit
Police and bus radio systems into the infrastructure. An unfunded contract option would
allow the addition of rail and maintenance radio systems, if exercised. Fiscal 2001 funds the
continuation of project management to support the installation of the radio system.
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing TPAS and BUSV radio systems are outdated and outmoded. The reliability of
the systems, especially at the fringes of the WMATA service area, is unacceptable.
Communication is essential to the safety and performance of personnel.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total:$3,124
$ In Thousands
o o o o
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FYOS

Page 129
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: ATC and Power Systems Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
• train communications upgrade,

• public address systems replacement,
• rehabilitation of ATC equipment,
• rehabilitation of Ale, TPSS and TPS equipment,
• traction power switchgear rehabilitation,
• Ale power control system,
• DC power redundancy.
These projects include design, procurement and installation of all communications

equipment with the systems including stations, yards and shops, and the rehabilitation and
replacement of electrical systems, AC and DC circuit breakers, switchgear, and wayside
automatic train control equipment. These projects address the need to maintain the
infrastructure and replace worn out, obsolete systems with new components utiliZing new
technology and achieving energy savings. Fiscal 2001 funds the installation of generators,
voltage regulators, motor control centers, track feeder breakers, traction power rectifiers,
switchgear, and the mUlti-year train to wayside rehabilitation.
JUSTIFICATION:
Communications systems and right-of-way systems have been in place for up to 24 years
and have been impacted by the elements which include station dust, water, high humidity
and corrosion. Equipment must be rehabilitated/replaced to ensure system reliability and
integrity.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
• In Thouaands Total: $62,474 I
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYO& FYD8

Page 130
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: UPS/Electrical Systems Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
• UPS system replacement,

• electrical systems rehabilitation.
These projects fund the replacement of UPS systems and battery banks and the
rehabilitation, replacement and upgrading of electrical systems including lighting, power
cables, power distribution feeds and panels, power transfer switches, motor control centers,
voltage regulators, generators and ancillary connected devices. Fiscal 2001 activities
include the replacement of UPS/batteries at 7 stations, and installation of generators, voltage
regulators and motor control centers.
JUSTIFICATION:
It is vital to replace and rehabilitate tunnel and passenger station lighting due to the harsh
underground environment and to to procure battery banks to provide emergency power at
stations to ensure that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.
BUDGET SCHDULE
Total: $15,140
$ In Thousands

Page 131
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Bus Fare Collection System Replacement
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of the existing bus fare collection system which has
exceeded its useful life, with a modern system that will enhance revenue collection by
ensuring accurate determination and reporting of fares. Approximately 1,400 buses will be
equipped with the new system. The new system will have the capability for integration with
other on-board bus systems and with Metrorail and parking lot fare collection equipment.
Fiscal 2001 funds the contract award for the procurement and installation of the fareboxes.
JUSTIFICATION:
It is believed that WMATA is losing considerable revenue because of the poor reliability of
the existing system, the requirement for the operator to monitor and enforce various fares,
and the fact that the system cannot recognize flash passes and does not automatically
deduct fares. The existing equipment has exceeded its useful life and must be replaced.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total: $22,795 I
$ In Thousands
21,902
893 o o o o
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY06 FYOS

Page 132
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: ROW Track and Structures Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION:
• ROW structural rehabilitation,

• ROW floating slab,
• ROW track rehabilitation.
These projects include the design, construction and rehabilitation of aerial structures and
tunnels, the retrofit of floating slabs to maintain proper rail elevations, and the replacement
of running rail, rail fasteners, rail switch points, stock rail frogs, restraining rail, cross ties and
fences and gates. Fiscal 2001 funds the installation of running rail and fasteners along the
Yellow Line, the steel tunnel liner rehabilitation on the Orange and Yellow Lines and retrofit
of floating slabs.
JUSTIFICATION:
These projects are required to control corrosion and deterioration due to weather, thermal
effects, cracks or breaks. Failure to replace these items will effect service reliability and
cause system degradation.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Sin Thouaands
I Total: $57,958 I
FY01 . FY02 FYD3 FY04 FYOS FYOS

Page 133
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Station Tunnel Leak Mitigation
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the design and implementation of a program to correct water leaks in
stations and tunnels to ensure the structural integrity of the tunnel liners and to prevent
corrosion of wayside systems and equipment. Ground water intrusion into stations and
tunnels is occurring at numerous stations within Metrorail at cracks and expansion joints.
Fiscal 2001 funds the repair of critical leaks along the Blue and Red Lines.
JUSTIFICATION:
Groundwater intrusion has caused extensive corrosion to wayside tunnel systems including
automatic train control, communications, traction power equipment and cabling. A program
is necessary to address this problem.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $10,970
$ In Thousands
Infrastructure Renewal Program --- Project Descriptions

Page 134
FY 2001 • 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Information Technology
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds a comprehensive program of replacement of technology systems

supporting the Rail Operations Control Center (ROCS), the mainframe computer, and the
major financial systems and databases. Fiscal 2001 funds the continuation of the ROCS
replacement, as well as database, mainframe and scheduling systems replacement.
JUSTIFICATION:
A long term focused approach is needed to address the technological needs of the Authority
and to insure a systematic replacement of systems is achieved so that the gathering,
processing and storing of data is secure.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
$ In Thousands
I Total: $60,541 I
2279

Page 135
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Program Management and Support
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds General and Program Administration costs, including outside engineering
and consultant costs.
JUSTIFICATION:
These costs are necessary to support the management and administration of the IRP and to
contract for the expertise necessary to design specific IRP projects.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total:$61,400
$ In Thousands
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FYOS FYOS

Page 136
FY 2001 - 2006
PROJECT TITLE: Preventive Maintenance
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds a portion of the bus/rail vehicle overhaul/maintenance program which is
included in the IRP. Fiscal 2001 funds the continuation of the comprehensive bus/rail
overhaul/maintenance program.
JUSTIFICATION:
Capitalizing a portion of the bus/rail overhaul/maintenance costs will ensure high quality bus
and rail vehicles. This program will also help to extend bus life to 15 years and will reduce
bus replacement costs and relieve the IRP of some financial burden.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total: $124,615 I
$ In Thousands
21.116

Page 137
This Page Not Used
Infrastructure Renewal Program' -'- Project Descriptions

Page 138
RAIL CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Rail Construction Program

Page 139
This Page Not Used
Rail Construction Program

Page 140
FISCAL 2001 RAIL CAPITAL BUDGET
103·MILE SYSTEM COMPLETION
REAUTHORIZATION
In November, 1990, President Bush signed Reauthorization Legislation, Public Law

101-551, which provides$1.3 billion* in Federal funding to virtually complete the remaining
13.5 miles of the 103-mile Adopted Regional System. Local matching funds will total
$775.9 million*, resulting in $2,069.1 million* for rail construction after a $6.5 million
deduction for project management oversight from the Federal share. Local governments
and utilities have provided $10.3 million for additional scope work, $104 million was
transferred from the 89.5 mile budget, and $36.4 million was transferred from the
insurance buy-out for rail cars and the Branch Avenue Yard, bringing the total program
funds to $2,219.8 million.
*The originallCCA-5 program total was $2,069.6M, however, after the FY1999 appropriation, $O.3M federal remains
in the authorization that is not likely to be appropriated. The federal funds combined with the local match of $O.2M
results in a revised total of $2,069.1M. .
THE FAST TRACK
The Fast Track Program, whichtheWMATABoard adopted December 19, 1991, includes
construction of the last 13.5 miles of the Adopted Regional System for $2.1 billion
by 2001. This accelerated program creates the annual obligation level which in turn
becomes the annual budget, and is premised on concurrent construction on all lines with
strategies designed to compress schedules and reduce costs. There are four segments
in the Fast Track Program:
• Blue Line from Van Dorn Street to Franconia-Springfield;

• Red Line from Wheaton to Glenmont;
• Green Line from U Street-Cardozo to Fort Totten; and
• Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue
The Blue Line extension to Franconia-Springfield opened for revenue service on June 29,
1997, which completed the 103-mile system in Virginia. The segment consists of one
station and 3.30 miles of surface and aerial line in Fairfax County, Virginia. It is a vital link
in Northern Virginia's network oftransportation enhancements that include a transportation
center in Franconia adjacent to the station and commuter rail service between
Fredericksburg and Union Station on the Virginia Railway Express (VRE). The VRE
passengers will use the Metrorail parking facilities, busbays and pedestrian bridge to
access the VRE facilities which opened in July 1996. Metrorail construction began in late
Rail Construction Program -- Financial Summary

Page 141
1992 and was completed within budget and on schedule.
The Red Line extension to Glenmont opened for revenue service on JUly 25, 1998. The
extension consists of one station, one rail car yard and 1.35 miles of subway line. The
Red Line extension to Glenmont completes the system in Montgomery County.
Construction began in mid-1993 and was completed within budget and on schedule.
Two segments of the Green Line, the Mid-City Route extension between U Street and
Cardozo and Fort Totten, and the Branch Avenue extension between Anacostia and
Branch Avenue, are also included in this program. Completion of the full Green Line,
which begins in northern and ends in southern Prince George's County and travels
through the center of the District of Columbia, will mean increased economic vitality for
transit dependent communities to get to and from jobs, schools, recreation centers, stores
and other attractions.
The Mid-City Route opened for revenue service September 18, 1999. The extension
includes two stations and 2.9 miles of underground line tunnel construction in the District
of Columbia. Construction began in early 1994 and was complete within budget ahead
of schedule. This segment completes the Green Line from Greenbelt to Anacostia.
The Branch Avenue extension includes five stations and 6.42 miles of underground,
surface and aerial lines in the District of Columbia and Prince George's County, Maryland.
Groundbreaking was held in September 1995. Construction and installation of follow-on
systemwide components is well underway. The segment excluding the Branch Avenue
Yard is approximately 900k complete, is on schedule and within budgetfor revenue service
to commence in early 2001. The Branch Avenue Yard is approximately 25% complete,
is on schedule and within budget. The Yard is scheduled to be available for service mid
2002.
Overall, more than $1.9 billion of the $2.1 billion Fast Track bUdget is under contract and
more than $1.6 billion has been expended. All four segments are on schedule and are
on or below budget. More than $260 million in assured savings has been reserved for
construction of the Branch Avenue Yard and procurement of rail cars.
FUNDING FAST TRACK
The Fast Track Program requires three funding components to maintain the schedule.
These are, (1) stable Federal Appropriations beginning in Federal Fiscal 1992 and
continuing through 1999, (2) local matching contributions from local jurisdictions to secure
the Federal Appropriation, and (3) a Credit Facility or Line of Credit from major lending
institutions.
During the past year, the cumulative grant funds approved by the Federal Transit
Administration reached the level that permitted cancellation of the Line of Credit that was
critical to commencing the Fast Track Program. The Credit Facility was needed, since
under WMATA's Compact, it must have a funding source in place at the time it contracts

Page 142
with a third party for construction, material or services. Further, in order to sustain the
schedule, WMATA must contract with third parties at an aggregate value in excess of the
combined Federal Appropriations and local jurisdictional match. Thus, by incorporating
private sector financing into the base, the construction schedule was achieved. The Credit
Facility was maintained with the Union Bank of Switzerland and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company.
Each of the local jurisdictions has endorsed the program and signed the Fifth Interim
Capital Contributions Agreement (ICCA-V) which lays out the schedule and associated
costs for both the federal and local share of construction.
ADMINISTRATION
The Fast Track Construction Program relies on a project management organization at

WMATA wherein each segment is under the responsibility of a project manager,
supported by a team of architects and engineers from start to finish. The project manager
has ultimate responsibility for maintaining the budget and schedule for his or her discrete
portion of Fast Track.

Page 143
FINANCING SOURCES FOR METRORAIL CONSTRUCTION
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
INVESTMENTSI
TOTAL FEDERAL LOCAL BONDS
Funds Authorized Prior to

Stark-Harris Appropriations
Direct Appropriation # 1 $1,721 $1,147 $474 $100

Handicapped Facilities 65 52 13 0
Add-On Projects 23 7 16 0
Highway Transfers 2,610 2,156 258 196
Bond Sales 813 0 49 764
Subtotal $5,232 $3,362 $810 $1,060
Stark-Harris Appropriations
1983 $300 $240 $38 $22

1984 312 250 37 25
1985 312 250 47 15
1986 270 216 36 18
1987 250 200 31 19
1988 224 179 25 20
1989 209 167 22 20
1990 106 85 6 15
1991 80 64 9 7
1992 35 28 0 7
1993 20 16 0 4
Subtotal $2,118 $1,695 $251 $172

Project Management Oversight (1 ) 5 5 0 0
Stark-Harris Total $2,123 $1,700 $251 $172
Reauthorizations Appropriations
1992 $154 $96 $58 $0

1993 245 153 92 0
1994 318 199 119 0
1995 318 199 119 0
1996 318 199 119 0
1997 318 199 119 0
1998 319 199 120 0
1999 80 50 30 0
Subtotal thru FY 1999 $2,070 $1,294 $776 $0

Project Management Oversight (1) 6 6 0 0
Reauthorization Total $2,076 $1,300 $776 $0
Total Authorized $9,431 $6,362 $1,837 $1,232
(1) NOTE: Funds retained by the Federal Government to fund FTA oversight of the WMATA
Construction Program.
Rail Construction Program -- Funding Sources

Page 144
METRORAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
103 Mile System Completion
Projected Obligation Schedule

Mid-City Outer
Fiscal Year Rail Cars OCC Blue Line Red Line Green Line Green Line Total
Prior $8.5 $5.6 $16.5 $2.8 $33.4

1993 4.0 38.0 9.2 8.6 2.8 62.6
1994 2.4 38.2 126.5 261.3 30.3 458.7
1995 47.6 27.6 100.4 66.8 242.4
1996 11.4 34.4 60.2 310.1 416.1
1997 1.0 0.7 8.5 14.7 61.1 109.3 195.3
1998 198.6 5.7 11.4 35.0 103.4 354.1
1999 20.7 0.4 7.7 34.7 39.2 102.7
2000 51.6 7.1 14.1 22.4 110.5 205.7
2001 6.9 0.3 5.1 67.7 80.0
2002 38.3 24.6 62.9
2003 6.0 6.0
TOTAL PROGRAM $278.8 $7.1 $165.4 $251.5 $643.6 $873.5 $2,219.9
Project Cost Summary

Mid-City Outer
Description Blue Line Red Line Green Line Green Line Total
Management and Consultants $29.5 $41.8 $88.8 $115.9 $276.0

Startup and Force Account 1.4 3.4 2.0 2.5 9.3
Work Equipment 3.1 2.7 1.1 8.8 15.7
Preliminary Engineering 0.2 0.5 1.3 2.8 4.8
Design 8.1 9.4 20.0 32.2 69.7
Real Estate 5.2 1.6 19.5 30.0 56.3
Station, Line and Yard 80.5 123.6 386.4 392.2 982.7
Systemwide 27.3 44.6 47.8 103.5 223.2
Other Construction 0.0 1.4 3.0 5.4 9.8
Contingency 0.0 5.0 35.0 12.0 52.0
Insurance 7.7 14.3 33.4 46.2 101.6
Fare Collection 1.4 1.9 2.5 6.0 11.8
Cost of Credit Facility 1.0 1.3 2.8 4.0 9.1
Subtotal 103-Mile System 165.4 251.5 643.6 761.4 1,821.9
Operations Control Center 7.1

Rail Cars 69.1 42.4 0.0 167.3 278.8
Branch Avenue Yard 112.0 112.0
TOTAL PROGRAM $234.5 $293.9 $643.6 $1,040.7 $2,219.8

Page 145
FY 2001 Obligations
Mid-City Outer
Management and Consultants $0.3 $5.0 $13.8 $19.1

Startup and Force Account 2.0 2.0
Work Equipment 4.6 4.6
Preliminary Engineering
Design 0.1 0.4 0.5
Real Estate 1.5 1.5
Station, Line and Yard 10.8 10.8
Systemwide 11.5 11.5
Other Construction 2.0 2.0
Contingency 8.5 8.5
Insurance
Fare Collection
Cost of Credit Facility
Yard 12.6 12.6
Rail Cars 6.9 6.9
Subtotal 103 Mile Program 0.0 0.3 5.1 74.6 80.0
89 Mile Program 2.0
TOTAL OBLIGATIONS 0.0 0.3 5.1 74.6 $82.0
FY 2001 Expenditures
Mid-City Outer
Management and Consultants $0.3 $7.3 $13.2 $20.8

Startup and Force Account 1.7 1.7
Work Equipment 0.2 4.8 5.0
Preliminary Engineering
Design 0.5 1.1 1.6
Real Estate 0.3 3.0 3.3
Station, Line and Yard 4.8 17.4 22.2
Systemwide 0.9 25.8 26.7
Other Construction 0.4 2.7 3.1
Contingency 1.5 1.5
Insurance
Fare Collection 0.3 0.3
Cost of Credit Facility
Yard 44.3 44.3
Rail Cars 96.6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0.0 $0.3 $14.4 $115.8 $227.1

Page 146
BLUE LINE: VAN DORN TO FRANCONIA-SPRINGFIELD (J/H ROUTE)
Status Entering WMATA Fiscal 2001
• METRORAIL Station Complete and in Revenue Service
Major Activities During WMATA Fiscal 2001
• Contract Close-out
Revenue Operations Date
• June 1997 - Completed on Schedule
Rail Construction Program -- Franconia/Springfield Line

Page 147
Q)
c:
:.J
"0
Q)
~
Cl
...
C
C-
en
""'-
.~
C
o
Route .Station "~
~
Mil•• Locatlona u.
-~ ..•.- E
Surface 3.28 1
...roCD
I Aerial 0.02
--=... ........
0
0
L.
0..
C
~
811 .0
~
()
~
Totals 3.30 1 .....,
~
0CO
c~
o~
u m
Fairfax Co•• VA 3.30 1 ==(0 CJ)
ro
a: a...
RED LINE: WHEATON TO GLENMONT (OUTER B ROUTE)
• Glenmont Station complete and in Revenue Service
• Contract Close-out
• July 25, 1998 - Completed on Schedule
Rail Construction Program -- Glenmont Line

Page 149
":IJ
Q) Q)
cc==
CD
~o
n
O1::J
oen.-+
..,
C
o
.....
o·
::J
..,-U
o
..,
(Q
Q)
Route Station
Mil_ Locations
........ ~
Underground 1.35 1
(Montgomery Co., MD)
GREEN LINE: U STREET TO FORT TOTTEN (E ROUTE)
• . Mid-City Route complete and in revenue service
• Complete landscaping
• Contract close-out
• September 18,1999 - Completed 3 months ahead of schedule
Rail Construction Program -- Mid-City Green Line

Page 151
--...
~
c:
I
o
;:;"
-<
G>
...,
CD
CD
::J
c:
::J
CD
Raute Billion
Mil•• Locatlona
• J
Underground 2.10 2
(Dlsbie!of Columbl.t
GREEN LINE: ANACOSTIA TO BRANCH AVENUE (F ROUTE)
• All major structural contracts completed.
• All reforestation and station landscaping contracts awarded

and underway.
• Track and special trackwork installation completed and contact rail

energized for the entire route.
• Dynamic testing of automatic train control underway
• Yard construction underway. All underground utilities and sitework

completed.
• Complete systemwide contracts (traction power, automatic train

control, station furniture, communications and kiosks, elevators and
escalators, graphics)
• Complete reforestation, landscaping and wetland mitigation

contracts.
• Install fare collection equipment.
• Complete pre-revenue operations and testing.
• Complete 500/0 of O&M Building, car wash and car maintenance

buildings of the yard; all systems work underway.
• Early 2001 - on schedule
• Branch Avenue Yard schedule completion - mid 2002
Rail Construction Program -- Branch Avenue Line

Page 153
"'U:IJ
OJ Q)
co =:
ron
~o
O1::J
~cn
.-+..,
C
(')
d.
o
:::J
"..,
o
co
..,
Q)
OJ
..,
Q)
:J
()
::r
»
<
ro
::J
c
CD
Route Station
c: MII.s Locations
~
-----..._--- ...._...- ..
CD
V.d Underground 1.27 1

Surf.c. 3.82 3
Aerial 1.&3 1
• .aa. .c:a ••c •• ==-_
Total. 8.42 &
I
i
t •"
Dlatrlct of Columbia 1.88 1
Prince Oeorg8'. 4.73 4
County, MD
REIMBURSABLE
PROJECTS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Reimbursable Projects
Page 155
This Page Not Used
Reimbu rsable Projects

Page 156
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS
The projects budgeted here are for new services or for items that incur operating
expenses for which there is a specific funding source other than local operating
subsidy. The concept of "New Service" was a direct offshoot of the Regional Mobility
Panel's recommendations to stabilize and strengthen Metrobus through a series of
initiatives. Through the Panel's efforts, a new spirit reinvigorated Metrobus and
provided a nationally recognized system a means to compete in terms of cost
effectiveness and efficiency with private carriers. A part of this competitiveness was
the acceptance of a New Service Agreement by Local 689 of the Amalgamated Transit
Union, which established new wages and benefits for bus operators operating new
service routes.
In fiscal 1999, the Authority established a new budget category to account for New
Service being operated by Metrobus. New Service is bus service not previously
performed by either the Authority or directly by a Compact Jurisdiction, and for which
a separate subsidy payment is made. Thus, these costs and revenues are not included
in either the regional or non-regional bus budgets. Examples of new service include the
Prince William County Service, 1-270 Shuttle, and the Greenbelt Shuttle.
POTOMAC & RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PRTC). WMATA

was awarded a multi-year contract (three year base, with two one-year options) to
operate local and express bus service in Prince William County beginning on July 6,
1998. The multi-million dollar annual contract marks the first time that the Authority
has competed successfully with private carriers to provide bus service. A staff of 95
Metrobus employees will operate and maintain 75 buses owned by Prince William
County, which are located in the County's transportation facility in Dale City, Virginia.
The service operates in Woodbridge, Dale City, Manassas and Manassas Park and
provides bus service to downtown Washington, and to the Pentagon, Crystal City,
Franconia-Springfield and West Falls Church Metro stations, in addition to local routes
in Prince William County. The fiscal year 2001 is the last year of the three year base
contract with an estimated amount of $4.8 million dollars.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DC DPW). On

November 10, 1999, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the District of
Columbia and the Authority was entered into for the duration of one year. WMATA will
provide technical staff and resources to assist the District's Department of Public
Works (DC-DPW) in administering their street, highway, and bridge construction and
rehabilitation programs. A staff of 35 limited-duration WMATA employees will be hired
for the duration of this MOA. All work associated with the MOA will be reimbursed by
the DC-DPW.
Page 157
MONTGOMERY COUNTY RIDE-ON. WMATA was awarded a one year contract to
operate bus service beginning September 7, 1999. The Authority is providing bus
service formerly operated by Montgomery County's Ride-On Service from the
Germantown / Gaithersburg / Poolesville area to/from Shady Grove Station and local
shuttle service around Silver Spring and Bethesda area. A staff of 22 Metrobus
employees will operate and maintain the service utilizing 12 specially painted
Metrobuses. The contract amount is $1.2 million.
GREENBELT SHUTTLE. The Greenbelt parking lot is larger than all other parking lots
in the Metro system, with 3,364 parking spaces. Estimated walking time from the
station to outlying areas of the parking lot is seven minutes. A shuttle operates
throughout the parking lot to transport patrons between five shelters and the station.
There is no fee for this shuttle. This demonstration project, which began in January,
1997, is paid for by the State of Maryland. Two additional part-time operators are
required to operate this service. Operating expenses are budgeted at $56,400. The
shuttle service will operate as long as funding is available and there is a sufficient
demand to justify continuation of the service.
SPRINGFIELD CIRCULATOR SERVICE. Fairfax County, in conjunction with the

Transportation Association of Greater Springfield (TAGS), has requested this service
be operated to enhance public transportation and decrease traffic congestion. The
Authority will purchase and operate 20-passenger buses on weekdays and service five
stops, including Franconia-Springfield Metro Station. The Authority will be reimbursed
for all operating and capital costs through funding provided by Virginia's CMAQ funds
($650,000) and matching funds from Fairfax County and TAGS ($180,000). This
service has added an additional 6 operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels.
SPRINGFIELD SHUTTLE. As part of the 1-95 11-395 / 1-495 Interchange Reconstruction

Congestion Mitigation Program, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and
the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) has approved
funding for the Authority to purchase and operate a 20-passenger bus. This service will
provide shuttle service to and from the parking structure at the Franconia-Springfield
Metro Station (when garage capacity meets 90%) to a remote lot at Springfield Mall.
The service will operate during peak and limited mid-day hours, Monday through Friday.
This service has additional one bus operator to approved staffing levels.
CROFTON - NEW CARROLLTON SERVICE. The Washington Suburban Transit

Commission has requested and the Board of Directors approved expanding the Transit
Zone to designated areas within Anne Arundel County, in and around Crofton,
Maryland. At the request of the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA), the Authority
will operate service for residents of the Crofton area to the New Carrollton Metro
Station; provide new service to growing but unserved areas of Bowie, Maryland; and
Page 158
add service to the Bowie Park & Ride lot to alleviate overcrowding. The cost of the
service will be reimbursed 100°;& by Maryland. This service has added an additional 2
operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels. The operating expenses are
budgeted at $138,000 offset by an estimated $31,000 in revenues.
VAN POOLS. This program is to assist Northern Virginia and the region in meeting air
quality conformity through emission reductions by increasing the utilization of van pools
and the amount of federal formula funds (Section 5307) allocated to the region and the
Authority. The van pool incentive program is the only emissions reduction program that
will be financially self-sustaining. The Authority has been asked to coordinate and
manage the program because it is the only regional agency that can accept and
disburse these federal funds. A portion of the funds received will be used to pay the
administrative costs of the Authority. The budget for fiscal 2001 is $150,500,
including two additional positions.
ACCESS-TO-JOBS. This program has five grant elements and when complete will
provide a "One Stop" employment trip information, referral and dispatching center
within the Authority, as well as provide trip brokerage services, outreach and reverse
commute to the suburban job market. The program will require three reimbursable
temporary positions which will remain for the duration of the grant. In Fiscal 2001,
WMATA will receive $344, 000 for direct expenses.
HYBRID-ELECTRIC BUS SERVICE. This is a new experimental service using hybrid-

electric buses in the City of Falls Church. The agreement is between the Northern
Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC), the City of Falls Church and WMATA. The
Authority will operate and maintain the buses by providing one additional mechanic and
four operators. The Fiscal 2001 budget is estimated at $512,000 and will be fully
reimbursed by NVTC.
Page 159
SUMMARY
REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS
FISCAL 2001
(in millions of dollars)
Service Expense Revenue Positions
PRTe $4.80 $4.80 95
DCDPW $3.70 $3.70 35

Ride-On $1.20 $1.20 22
Greenbelt Shuttle $0.06 $0.06 2
Springfield Circulator $0.66 $0.66 8
Springfield Shuttle $0.15 $0.15 1

Crofton - New Carrollton $0.14 $0.14 3
Van Pools $0.15 $0.15 2
Access-to-Jobs $0.34 $0.34 3

Hybrid-Electric Bus Service $0.51 $0.51 8
Total $11.71 $11.71 179
Page 160
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION
A separate budget category, reimbursable capital projects, was established during fiscal 1996
to fund projects that are fully reimbursed for all costs by state or local governments or private
entities. As a general rule, the reimbursable capital projects budget includes those projects
that are beyond the Authority's operating, capital improvement program or rail construction
program budgets.
The following list summarizes the currently approved projects and funding sources for
WMATA staff support and associated expenses. Each of the projects contains several
increments and specific activities, all of which will be performed on a reimbursable basis. In
fiscal 2001, an estimated 43 staff years and associated costs will be required to support
projects valued at approximately $74.6 million. The list also includes several large projects
for which some funds have been received by WMATA but are still in negotiation. It is
anticipated that there will be changes to the project budgets and staffing that will require
budget adjustments during the fiscal year.
BLUE LINE EXTENSION TO LARGO. On July 7,2000, the FTA granted approval forWMATA
to begin final design on the 3.1 mile Extension to Largo Town Center. Also, FTA issued pre-
award spending authority for the Extension in the amount of $33.0 million, exclusive of final
design cost. An agreement between WMATA and the Maryland Department of
Transportation has been executed providing financial commitment for the State share of the
$434 million project budget. An application for Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) was
submitted in May, 2000 and is under review by the FTA. Execution of the FFGA and
groundbreaking is anticipated for the Fall 2000. In May 2000, the WMATA Board approved
the Extension into the Adopted Region System (ARS) subject to Congressional approval of
the FFGA.
ROSSLYN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES. This project is comprised of modifications to the Rosslyn

Station entrance and mezzanine to provide passenger-oriented amenities and accommodations
by widening sidewalks, enhancing bus shelters, and improving external and internal signage,
lighting, entrances, and other elements of the station. WMATA will design and construct the
jointly agreed upon improvements for Arlington County. Construction contract was awarded
and Notice to Proceed issued October 18, 1999. Contract completion scheduled for May
2000. Total project budget is $2,125,000.
NEW DC CONVENTION CENTER. A new DC Convention Center has been approved for the
Mt. Vernon Square area which will require major modifications to the Mt. Vernon Square/UDC
Metrorail station. The Washington Convention Center Authority and WMATA have executed
Operating and Construction Agreements for the $25' million budgeted for station
improvements. The Mezzanine Contract was awarded in April, 1999 and substantial
completion occurred in February, 2000. The Entrance Expansion contract is scheduled to be
awarded in the Fall, 2000. In fiscal 2000 approximately $3.2 million will be allocated to this
project.
KING STREET STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS. The City of Alexandria accepted the King
Page 161
portions of the Study. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved the King Street Station
Project as a Reimbursable Project. An Agreement is scheduled for execution by July, 2000.
WMATA Staff will proceed with the installation of new fare gates and fare vendors, and
station modifications; thereby providing a new entrance to the existing mezzanine and a new
mezzanine with escalators, elevators, gates and vendors on the north side of Commonwealth
Avenue. The FY2001 budget for this project is $1.2 million.
DULLES AIRPORT CORRIDOR. Current proposals for the provision of improved public transit
services in the Tysons Corner to Dulles Airport corridor involve the creation of a bus rapid
transit service, followed by the construction of a rail line from West Falls Church to Dulles
Airport and beyond. A total of $1.5 million has been obligated to date for consultant services
and staff to study transit alternatives. A grant application for $40 million was submitted in
January 2000. Work will commence when funding becomes available.
VIENNA PARKING GARAGE. Fairfax County requested WMATA to conduct a feasibility study
for an additional parking structure at the Vienna station. Project agreements with Fairfax
County for the feasibility study, planning and design were approved in fiscal 1999, with
funding from the County's parking surcharge account. Public hearings were held and a design-
build contract was awarded in May 1999 and is scheduled for completion by February 2001.
SILVER SPRING TRANSPORTATION CENTER (SSTC) PHASES I & II: MTA is relocating its
MARC Silver Spring Commuter Railroad Station from its current location at the intersection
of Georgia Avenue to the immediate vicinity of the existing Silver Spring Metrorail station.
This relocation (SSTC Phase I Project) will require the construction of two (2) platforms
including associated pedestrian access facilities, a pedestrian bridge with stair towers and
elevators. As of December 1999 MTA has funded $216,863 for WMATA 's effort on this
project. The new intermodal transportation center (SSTC Phase II Project by Montgomery
County) will be a multilevel facility that will include improved bus bays, kiss & ride and taxi
spaces, intercity bus terminal, regional bicycle trails, future light rail and commuter oriented
retail/service spaces. The general plans were completed in December, 1999 and the WMATA
public hearing was held on January 18, 2000. The amount of funding and scope of support
for this project are still under negotiation between WMATA and Montgomery County.
WMATA temporarily funded their effort in SSTC Phase II using MTA's SSTC Phase I funds.
NEW PROJECT PLANNING. In fiscal 2001, $2.3 million is budgeted for advancing selected
projects through Engineering Development. This effort provides sketch engineering concepts
for new extension or capacity enhancement projects in the District, Maryland and Virginia.
Current focus is on the following projects:
Route 1 Pentagon to Braddock Road LRT

Maryland Beltway New Carrollton to Montgomery Mall Metrorail
Maryland Beltway Branch Avenue to Wilson Bridge Metrorail
Virginia Belt.way Wilson Bridge to Alexandria
Rosslyn Station Second Entrance
Projects within the district remain on hold pending confirmation from the Director of
Public Works.
Page 162
NEW YORK AVENUE STATION. This project involves the environmental planning, preliminary
engineering, public hearing, design and construction of a new "infill" station on the Red Line
between Union Station and Rhode Island Station. On July 22, 1999, the Board approved this
project as a Reimbursable Project. An initial $5,000,000 has been made available for the
environmental planning, preliminary engineering and public hearing. Funding for the total
project budget of approximately $84,000,000 is being coordinated with the District of
Columbia and the Federal Government. Obligations for FY2001 are projected at approximately
$2.9 million with obligations for FY2002 and beyond subject to approval of the project in the
TIP, WMATA Board approval of the project into the Adopted Regional System (ARS), and the
availability of funds.
BALLSTON STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This work involves planning, design and construction
of a new mezzanine, new entrance(s), and new elevators. On December 9, 1999, the Board
approved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinated with
Arlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $8,700,000
has been identified by the County for this project with additional funds anticipated to be
identified in the future. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will be dependent on Task Order
requests received from Arlington County.
CLARENDON STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This project involves a planning, design and

construction of an Entrance Canopy and related site improvements. On December 9, 1999,
the Board approved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinated
with Arlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately
$960,000 has been identified for the project. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will be
dependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.
ROSSLYN STATION IMPROVEMENTS. This project involves a planning study effort for a new
2 nd Entrance into the Station. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as a
Reimbursable Project. An agreement is being coordinated with Arlington County and is
expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $120,000 has been identified for the
project with additional funds to be identified in the future. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond
will be dependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.
SHIRLINGTON BUS TERMINAL. This project involves the design and construction of a new
off-street terminal with improved passenger transfer capability and patron amenities. On
December 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as a Reimbursable Project. An agreement
is being coordinated with Arlington County and is expected to be executed by July 2000.
Approximately $1,100,000 has been identified for this project. Obligations for FY2001 and
beyond will be dependent on Task Order requests received from Arlington County.
PENTAGON BUS TERMINAL. This project involves the relocation and reconfiguration of the
existing bus terminal. On December 9, 1999, the Board approved this project as a
Reimbursable Project. An Agreement is being coordinated with Arlington County and is
expected to be executed by July 2000. Approximately $200,000 has been identified for this
project. Obligations for FY2001 and beyond will be dependent on Task Order requests
received from Arlington County.
Page 163
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT·AUTHORITY
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION
Estimate In
Millions
Blue Line Extension to Largo $100.00
Rosslyn Livable Communities $ 0.00
New DC Convention Center $ 3.20
King Street Station Access Improvements $ 1.42
Dulles Airport Corridor $ 40.00*
Vienna Parking Garage $ 0.34
Silver Spring Transportation Center $ 0.00
New Project Planning $ 2.30
New York Avenue Station $ 70.00
Ballston Station Improvements $ 8.70
Clarendon Station Improvements $ 0.96
Rosslyn Station Improvements $ 0.12
Shirlington Bus Terminal $ 1.10
ITS Communication Projects $ 1.56
Pentagon Bus Terminal $ 0.20
Total $229.91
* Fiscal 2001-2002 Budget
Page 164
ALLOCATION OF
SUBSIDY BY
JURISDICTION
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction

Page 165
This Page Not Used
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction

Page 166
FISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION SUBSIDY REQUIREMENTS
OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY
The Operating Budget for Fiscal 2001 is supported by $338.8 million of state and local subsidy
contributions, excluding debt service costs of $27.5 million. Funding for operations comes
from many sources, the largest source being passenger and non-passenger revenues generated
from operation of the system. Total operating revenues for fiscal 2001 are projected at
$389.6 million.
The total operating subsidy plus d~bt service, $366.3 million, will be billed to the District of
Columbia; Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland; and the Cities of
Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church and the Counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia.
Subsidy contributions are billed in accordance with a series of allocation procedures as
approved by the WMATA Board of Directors. The State of Maryland funds all of the operating
assistance, matching funds for rail construction expenditures and funding for the Infrastructure
Renewal Program allocated to the two Maryland Counties. The Commonwealth of Virginia
provides a portion of the operating and capital funds to the Northern Virginia Transportation
Commission on behalf of the Northern Virginia jurisdictions.
The allocations presented in this budget are computed based on the fiscal 2001 costs and
revenues by mode as follows:
Approved Budget
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Net Local Audit
Cost Revenue Subsidy Adjustment
Bus Operations (incl. Charter) $297,144 $106,742 $190,402 ($4,978)

Rail Operations * 406,742 281,551 125,191 ($17,548)
MetroAccess 24,598 1,346 23,252 2,010
TOTAL - Operating $728,484 $389,639 $338,845 ($20,516)

Plus: Debt Service 27,484
Net Operating Subsidy $366,329

* Includes max fare subsidy of $3, 196,700.
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction-- Operating

Page 167
The costs shown above are net of $19.4 million of preventive maintenance expenses that are
capitalized and funded through the Infrastructure Renewal Program (lRP). Beginning in fiscal
1998, in lieu of federal operating assistance, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) allowed
transit properties to capitalize a portion, not to exceed 50%, of revenue vehicle maintenance
expenses. In line with this authority, the operating budget for fiscal 2001 capitalizes $18
million of Metrobus revenue vehicle maintenance and overhaul expense and $1.4 million for
Metrorail preventive maintenance.
The revenues shown on the previous page incorporate the transfer of $8.7 million of Metrorail
passenger revenues to the Metrobus mode. This was a funding concept initiated with the Fiscal
2000 Operating Budget to help fund the Metrobus Fare Simplification program. On February
25, 1999, the WMATA Board approved Resolution #99-09, adopting the fare restructuring
effective June 20, 1999. This resolution recognized the General Manager's commitment not
to increase Metrobus average fares or subsidies for the same level of service through fiscal
2002 and extended this commitment to include Metrorail fares through fiscal 2002. In the
Fiscal 2000 Budget, $3.8 million of rail revenues were transferred to the Metrobus mode; the
Fiscal 2001 Budget transfers an additional $4.9 million.
A. METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE FORMULA
In 1997 , the WMATA Board of Directors established a Regional Mobility Panel to determine
how to meet current and future bus transportation needs for the region. As part of that effort,
the Panel conducted an in-depth study of Metrobus service and how local jurisdictions are
charged for their service. The Panel recommended: (1) criteria to classify Metrobus service as
regional and non-regional service; and (2) a new benefit-based subsidy allocation formula for
regional service. The Board of Directors approved the regional Metrobus subsidy allocation
formula on June 25, 1998 (Resolution #98-27) and the non-regional Metrobus subsidy
allocation formula on July 9, 1998 (Resolution #98-32). Each local jurisdiction and the
Washington Suburban Transit Commission approved the new regional formula by signing the
Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement (IFA) for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and
Replacement Program. The chart at the end of this section, entitled "Fiscal 2001 Summary of
State/Local Operating Requirements," is based on the new for~ulas and transition ceilings for
each jurisdiction to phase in the change from the old to the new formula.
Based on the criteria set out in the IFA, each bus route has been designated either as a route
of regional significance or as a non-regional route. The routes by category have been modified
from the originallFA as changes have been made to the Metrobus service plan. Estimates of
the annual platform hours for fiscal 2001 for each Metrobus route are presented in the
UMetrobus Operations" section of this book.

Page 168
Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation
The regional Metrobus subsidy allocation formula is based on each jurisdiction's share of four
factors:
~ 25% of subsidy - a weighted average of urbanized area population and population

density using 1990 census data and the 1990 census population definition of the
urbanized area;
~ 15% of subsidy - weekday ridership on the regional routes by jurisdiction of residence;
~ 35% of subsidy - annual revenue miles for the regional routes; and
~ 25% of subsidy - annual revenue hours for the regional routes.
However, for fiscal 1999 through 2002, the amounts billed to each jurisdiction for regional
service are the amounts set out in Resolution #98-27, plus improvements to regional service
implemented as part of (1) new rail phase openings or (2) Board approved regional service
guidelines. Specifically, the changes to the regional base allocation are:
~ service on Route C8 from the Glenmont Station to College Park was expanded to add
mid-day weekday and Saturday service (fiscal 1999);
~ a Route F2 loop was added on the Chillum Road line (fiscal 1999);
~ regional bus routes serving the neighborhoods around the Columbia Heights and Georgia
Avenue - Petworth Metrorail Stations were restructured to better serve the community
(fiscal 2000);
the deployment of small buses in the District of Columbia allowed improved structuring
of service on Routes 01, D3 from Sibley Hospital to Stadium - Armory, Routes H2, 3,
4, the Crosstown Line, and the N2,4,6, the Massachusetts Avenue line (fiscal 2000);
~ service adjustments to relieve overcrowding and improve schedule adherence were
approved as part of the Fiscal 2000 Operating Budget (fiscal 2000);
~ additional service adjustments to relieve overcrowding and improve schedule adherence
are included in the Proposed Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget;
~ new regional bus service which consists of service from Anacostia to Minnesota
Avenue, from Chevy Chase to Dupont Circle, from Brookland to Potomac Park, from
Greenbelt to Twinbrook (C2/C4), from Greenbelt to Glenmont, and from Alexandria to
the Potomac Yard Circulator (fiscal 2001);
~ Branch Avenue Bus Service Plan for 5.5 months of rail service from the Anacostia
Station to Branch Avenue. This service will commence on January 13, 2001.
~ conversion of the SmartMover bus service from demonstration service to regional bus
service. Express bus service from Bethesda to Tyson's Corner, Metrobus Routes 14A,B,
M, has been operating as a demonstration service since September 28, 1998. The
approved budget includes a plan to cut back service to reflect the ridership, thereby
creating a cut-back route 14C and 14D from Lake Forest to Rock Springs in Montgomery
County. In the allocation formula, ridership, revenue miles, and revenue hours are
charged 50% to Fairfax County and 50% to Montgomery County for all express and
shuttle routes except Route 14C and 140 where they are charged to Montgomery
County (fiscal 2001);
~ implementation of the Washington Navy-Yard Shuttle, Branch Avenue to King Street
route (fiscal 2001);
~ additional strategic buses (fiscal 2001);

Page 169
additional bus service resulting from weekend late closing from midnight to 2:00 a.m.
Service from midnight to 1:00 a.m. was implemented in November 1999 as
demonstration service and is now a permanent part of the fiscal 2001 budget. Service
from 1:00 - 2:00 a.m. is in the fiscal 2001 budget as demonstration service for a full
year (fiscal 2001);
other revenues and costs related to regional bus service such as new advertising
contract revenues and worker's compensation savings, and costs for enhanced
marketing, diesel fuel, and employee training and accelerated recruitment (fiscal 2001).
The allocation of the regional Metrobus subsidy for the Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget is
presented on Table 1.
Non-regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation
In Resolution #98-32, the Board approved a mechanism to allocate among the jurisdictions the
costs and revenues for non-regional Metrobus service. The mechanism essentially distributes
the cost of non-regional service in proportion to the platform hours and the passenger revenues
in accordance with revenue-by-line data from the registering farebox system. The platform
hours by line and by jurisdiction are shown in the "Metrobus Operations" section of this book.
The General Manager's commitment to stable Metrobus subsidies from fiscal 1998 through
fiscal 2002 applies to non-regional, as well as to regional, Metrobus service. Thus, the base
subsidy for non-regional remains as established in Resolution #98-32. Metrobus service
changes to the base are:
.. the Oyster/Lewis school service, L30-34, in the District of Columbia (fiscal 1999);
.. the 1-270 express service, J8, 9, from Montgomery Village to the Bethesda Metro
Station (fiscal 1999);
.. restructuring of service in the Kettering area of Prince George's County, routes
C22,23,25,26 (fiscal 1999);
.. extension of route 28C to Northern Virginia Community College (fiscal 1 S99);
.. restructuring of Glover Park-Trinidad line, the Crosstown lines, the Massachusetts
A venue line, and the Southeast Community Hospital Line with deployment of the new
small bus fleet in the District of Columbia (fiscal 2000);
.. new routes serving the Columbia Heights, Woodley Park, and Mount Pleasant
neighborhoods with the opening of the Inner Green Line; and
.. the extension of routes 3W, 3Z, and 24T in Fairfax County to the new Tyson's
Transportation Center.
.. adjustments in service resulting from implementation of new rail service from Anacostia
to Branch Avenue (fiscal 2001)
.. planning activities for bus service from Union Station to the Dulles corridor (fiscal 2001 );
other non-regional bus service costs resulting from the weekend late closing, enhanced
marketing, and diesel fuel (fiscal 2001).

Page 170
The platform hours by jurisdiction are:
TABLE 2
Platform
Jurisdiction Hours
District of Columbia 344,316
Montgomery County 106,410
Prince George's County 208,034
Alexandria 19,743
Fairfax County 106,510
Total 785,013
The subsidies by jurisdiction for non-regional service are shown on Table 3. The base is the
service approved for the Fiscal 1999 Budget. The new service is any service since the Fiscal
1999 Budget was approved.

Page 171
B. METRORAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE
Metrorail operating assistance is $125.2 million for fiscal 2001. Two allocation formulas are
used to determine the subsidy for each jurisdiction: the rail sUbsidy allocation formula has been
used to allocate $122.0 million of subsidy and the max fare subsidy formula has been used to
allocate $3.2 million of subsidy.
(1 ) Metrorail Subsidy
The Metrorail subsidy allocated for billing purposes totals $121,994,729. Each jurisdiction's
share is determined as follows:
~ One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the relative number of stations in
operation in each jurisdiction. This factor includes all stations in the system with the
exception of the Arlington Cemetery Station.
One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of a weighted average of urbanized

area population and population density using 1990 census data and the 1990 census
population definition of the urbanized area. Fiscal 1994 was the first fiscal year that
1990 census data was used.
One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the weekday Metrorail passengers
by jurisdiction of residence. This factor has been computed using data from the Spring
1994 Metrorail Passenger Survey.
The percent distribution for fiscal 2001 is shown on the following page. The allocation of
stations and passengers includes the opening of the outer green line stations on January 13,
2001.
(2) Max Fare Subsidy
The max fare subsidy is one-half the revenue differential between what riders traveling more
than six composite miles actually pay and what they would have paid without a tapered mileage
charge or a fare cap. The allocation of this subsidy by jurisdiction is determined from the
Metrorail passenger survey. The charge to each jurisdiction reflects the residence of the riders
receiving the benefit of the reduced peak period fares and the value of the benefit received.
The estimated amount of max fare subsidy for fiscal 2001 is $3, 196,700. The slight increase
over fiscal 2000 reflects the opening of the outer green line stations on January 13,2001. The
estimated distribution is shown below.

Page 172
Metrorail Subsidy and
Max Fare Subsidy
Estimated Jurisdiction Distributions - Fiscal 2001
Metrorail Max Fare

Jurisdiction Subsidy Subsidy
District of Columbia 36.93% 6.85%
Montgomery County 18.00% 50.30%
Prince George's County 16.29% 15.93%
Alexandria 4.38% 2.08%
Arlington County 9.95% 1.66%
Fairfax City 0.30% 1.06%
Fairfax County 13.87% 21.81 %
Falls Church 0.28% 0.31 °16
Total 100.00% 100.00%

Page 173
C. METROACCESS OPERATING ASSISTANCE
MetroAccess is the regional paratransit system coordinated by WMATA to provide public transit
services to individuals with disabilities who either reside in or are visiting the WMATA service
area. The system was established in response to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA). The Act requires that complementary paratransit service be provided to persons who
are not able to use the regular transit system. MetroAccess is supported by members of the
WMATA compact. The system is operated with core carriers 1 complemented by contract
service operators. 2 Fiscal 2001 will be the fifth year of the Federal mandate requiring all transit
properties to provide unconstrained levels of paratransit service.
The WMATA Board of Directors approved a new paratransit formula on June 10, 1999, that
more accurately assigned the costs of the MetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served.
Beginning with fiscal 2000 and continuing until changed by the Board of Directors, WMATA's
MetroAccess costs will be allocated among the District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince
George's Counties in Maryland, and Northern Virginia as an entity, as follows:
• Direct Costs - the contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation, and eligibility
charges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and
• Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocated in
proportion to the direct costs.
The Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and Fairfax Counties, and the Cities of
Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined that the following procedure will be used
by WMATA to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia:
• Direct Costs - per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of trips
provided for each jurisdiction; and
• Overhead Costs - these costs will be allocated within Northern Virginia based on
the direct costs as calculated for each jurisdiction.
I Core carriers are operators of local paratransit services that participate in the
MetroAccess Regional Paratransit System. Core carriers, as carrier of first choice in their
jurisdiction, are committed to operating as many paratransit trips as capacity permits.
2 Contract service providers are those carriers who provide paratransit services,
under contract with WMATA.
AJlocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction-- Operating

Page 174
The proposed and the jurisdiction allocation are based on the rates in the contract effective mid-
January 2000 as follows:
July Through Mid-December

Mid-December, 2000 Through
Monthly Fees 2000 June 2001
Vehicle Lease per Vehicle $1,100 $1,098
Reservation/Scheduling
Cost per Trip Requests $3 $3
Vehicle Operating Cost Per

Trips Completed $24 $23
Eligibility - Interviews Only

- Per Interview $14 $14
Eligibility - Interview and

Testing - Per Individual $65 $65
These rates are then used to estimate the cost to each jurisdiction based on projected data for:
.. vehicles required
.. total trip requests including core trips
.. trips completed using MetroAccess
.. certifications and re-certifications for eligibility
.. average trip length - Virginia jurisdictions only
On June 8, 2000, WMATA's Board of Directors modified the Fiscal 2001 contract funding
authority on the paratransit contract. This modification also authorized WMATA to assume
responsibility for operating the paratransit core services for Prince George's County and Fairfax
County on September 1, 2000 and October 1, 2000 respectively.
Table 4 presents estimates of the data listed above and the allocated cost for the District of
Columbia, Montgomery County, Prince George's County and total Northern Virginia. Table 5
presents the data and allocated cost for each Northern Virginia jurisdiction.

Page 175
D. WMATA DEBT SERVICE
In December 1993, WMATA and the Federal Government refinanced the $997 million of transit
revenue bonds issued in the 1970's to construct the Metrorail Adopted Regional System. The
Authority refinanced its one-third share of bonds ($332.3 million) by issuing $334,015,000 of
gross revenue transit refunding bonds at varying coupon rates ranging from 2.75% to 6.00/0.
The objectives of the refinancing were to:
(1) generate funding for the capital improvement program;

(2) take advantage of the suppressed bond market;
(3) maintain the current annual net cost to WMATA and the jurisdictions of
$27,484,194; and
(4) maintain the original bond maturity date of July 1, 2014.
The refinancing generated $54 million of proceeds for the capital improvement program.
The allocation of the local share remains as in all prior year budgets and is based on the rail
construction formula for the Adopted Regional System using data developed for the Proposed
Financial Plan, August 1978. The local shares remain as set forth in the Ancillary Bond
Repayment Agreements and are not revised as the data used for the rail construction formula
is updated.
E. FISCAL 1999 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT
In May 1999, the Authority recognized that there would be a significant budget surplus at the
end of fiscal 1999 of approximately $20.1 million. At the same time, the jurisdictions were
reviewing the recommended Fiscal 2000 Operating Budget. To give the jurisdictions maximum
flexibility as to the use and flexibility of year-end budget savings, the Board of Directors
approved Resolution #99-24, stating that ... "a jurisdiction may utilize immediately its share of
the estimated fiscal 1999 savings ... subject to subsequent adjustments as a result of the final
audited subsidy for each jurisdiction. The actual year-end savings were $20,515,500. Table
6 shows the computation of the final audit adjustment for fiscal 1999 by mode and by
jurisdiction, as well as a comparison of the final adjustment to the estimate.
F. SUMMARY
Table 7 presents the state and local funding requirements for fiscal 2001.

Page 176
» TABLE 1
0
()
METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE
Q)
REGIONAL
d.
0 FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
::J
0
-to.
en
C
C" PRINCE
en DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
a:
'<
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
C" REGIONAL· BASE PER RESOLUTION #98-27 $65,054,000 $19,174.000 $22.132.000 $7,765.000 $11.970,000 $135.000 $17,420.000 $649.000 $144,299,000
-< FISCAL 1999 SERVICE CHANGES:
L ROUTE C8 EXPANSION ($50.600) $280.200 $270,500 ($7.100) ($12.200) $600 $300 ($700) $481.000
,c: ROUTE F1/2 LOOP
FISCAL 2000 SERVICE CHANGES:
($3.000) ($4.000) $11.900 ($500) ($700) ($700) $3.000
Cii· DC SMALL BUS $228.000 ($28.000) ($29,000) ($11.000) ($17.000) $0 ($14.000) ($1,000) $128,000
a. MID-CITY LINE $60,000 $90.667 $109.333 $36.000 $57,333 $1,333 $74,667 $2.667 $432,000
n FISCAL 2000 BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES $1,002,000 $695.000 $353.000 $51,000 $56,000 $4.000 $721.000 $9,000 $2.891.000
!:!'. FISCAL 2000 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT ($1,528,478) ($448.678)
0 ($506.048) ($187,920) ($289.842) ($2,205) ($436,322) ($16,807) ($3.416,300)
:J FISCAL 2001 SERVICE CHANGES:
I FISCAL 2001 BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES $690,100 $955.600 $697,200 $268,400
I $141.400 $4,200 $567,800 $2,400 $3.327,100
TECHNJCAl SKILLS PROGRAM - YEAR 2 $397,618 $125.857 $139.964 $47,306 $73,096 $868 $111,374 $3,916 $900.000
0 NEW ADVERTISING CONTRACT REVENUES (1.189,243) (376,429) (418.622) (141.490) (218.624) (2.597) (333.111) (11,712) (2,691,829)
-0 NEW REGIONAL BUS SERVICE 1.031.000 445.000 445.000 558.000 133,000 3,000 168.000 4.000 2.787.000
..,CD
Q)
BRANCH AVENUE BUS SERVICE PLAN - 5.5 MON 250,000 11,000 (126.000) 5.000 7.000 16.000 0 163,000
CONVERT sMARTMOVER TO REGIONAL 43.000 786.000 19.000 (3,000) 2.000 675,000 1,522.000
d. ENHANCED MARKETING 108.049 33.901 37.957 12.630 20.260 409 30,344 1,448 245.000
~
co WASHINGTON NAVY-YARD sHUffiE 127.000 (14.000) 18.000 36,000 (6.000) 163,000
BRANCH AVENUE TO KING STREET 150,000 46.000 1901000 17,000 26,000 43.000 1.000 473,000
WEEKEND LATE CLOSING TO 2:00 A.M. 330.211 96,941 109,304 40,597 62.611 476 94,270 3.630 738.040
ADDITIONAL STRATEGIC BUSES 238.601 75.500 84,000 28.400 43,900 500 66,800 2.299 540,000
TRAINING AND ACCELERATED RECRUITMENT 110,449 34,960 38.879 13.141 20.304 241 30.937 1.088 250,000
DIESEL FUEL 327.393 103.629 115.245 38.951 60.186 715 91,704 3.224 741.048
WORKER'S COMPENSATION (53.753) (16.680) (35.100) (3,815) 0 0 (20.651) 0 C130.000)
TOTAL REGIONAL $67,320,346 $22,068,469 $23,638,514 $8,420,601 $12.294,726 $148.541 $19.300.412 $653.452 $153,845,059
-u
Q)
co
CD
-0»
Ol- TABLE 3
eo-
m g
~Q)
METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE
....... _.
n NON-REGIONAL
oog
FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
0
.....--
(J)
C PRINCE
C'" DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
CJ) COLUMBIA COUNlY COUNlY ALEXANDRIA COUNlY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
c:
'<
C-
-< NON-REGIONAl BASE PER RESOLUTION # 98-32 $12.975.919 $3.930.347 $9.214.738 $594.462 $0 $0 $5.247,334 $0 $31,962,800
FISCAL 1999 SERVICE CHANGES:
'-
C OYSTERILEWIS SCHOOL SERVICE $100,700 $100,700
::::!. 1-270 EXPRESS SERVICE: J8. J9 $512.000 $512,000
CI'J RESTRUCTURE kETTERING SERVICE: C22,23,25,26 ($66,900) ($66,900)
a. EXTEND ROUTE 28C TO NVCC $421.600 $421,600
,...
n FISCAl 2000 SERVICE CHANGES:
o'
:J
DC SMALL BUS
MID-CllY LINE
$591.000 $591,000
I
I
BRANCH AVENUE - BUS REVENUE LOSS $200.000 $200.000
EXTEND ROUTES 3T.W,Z TO TYSON'S - WESTPARK
0 TRANSPORTATION CENTER $35.000 $35,000
"0 M20 $2,000 $2,000
CD
...., B9. H8. K2. M4 $357,000 $357,000
Q)
W2.6,e $289.000 $289.000
!:!'. 12C.E.F $217.400 $217,400
::J
CO FISCAL 2001 SERVICE CHANGES:
BRANCH AVENUE BUS SERVICE PLAN· 5.5 MONTHS 584,000 253.000 837,000
UNION STATION TO DULLES 750.000 750.000
ENHANCED MARKETING 23.982 7,442 15,660 1,702 0 0 9.213 0 58.000
WEEKEND LATE CLOSING TO 2:00 A.M. 37.004 13,583 22.438 3.087 0 0 5.847 0 81.960
DIESEL FUEL 86,399 26.811 56.417 6,132 0 0 33.193 0 208.952
TOTAL NON-REGIONAL $15,797,004 $4.490.183 $9.695.353 $1.026,984 $0 $0 $5,547,987 $0 $36,557,512
TABLE 4
» ALLOCATION OF METROACCESS COSTS AND REVENUES

o
o
w ESTIMATED METROACCESS USAGE DURING FISCAL 2001:
C.
o EUglbflitV Certification
::J
Vehicles Trip Requests MelroAccess Medica! Testing
o
-h Required Incruding Core Trips Compteted Interviews Plus Interviews
(j)
C Jurisdiction
C"
en District of Columbia 35 251.020 201528 649 278
a:
-< Montgomery 59 350,686 331991 991 424
C- Prince George's 25 227,025 151110 608 261
<
L Virginia 19 167.563 98231 755 324
c:
.,
(j)' Total 138 996.294 782.860 3.003 1.287
e.
o
,..... COMPUTATION OF SUBSIDY:
o·
::I Direct Operating Costs
I
I Vehicle Reservation! Vehlcte Direct Allocation of Revenue:
Lease Scheduling Operating Operating % Distribution Overhead Eligibility Eligibility Tests Completed Trips
o Cost Cost Cost Cost of Dlrect Costs Costs Interviews and Interviews Total Cost Minus Companions Subsidy
u
..,
CD
Composite Unit Cost for Fisca' 2001 $1100/month $3.01/trip $23.22 $14.00 $65.00 $2.20 fare
Q)
~. Jurisdiction
~
CO $5.915,683
District of Columbia $461.740 $756.524 $4.678,110 $5.696.374 25.63% $338.215 $9.086 $18.075 $6.261.750 $346.067
Montgomery $780.315 $1,056.897 $7.706.573 $9.543.785 41.49% $547,430 $13.874 $27,586 $10,132,676 $569,961 $9.562.715
Prince George"s $329.814 $684.208 $3,508.419 $4,522.441 19.66% $259,406 $8.512 $16.950 $4,801.308 $259.527 $4.547.781
Virginia $250.681 $505.001 $2,285.301 $3.040.983 13.22% $174.430 $10.570 $21.045 $3,247,028 $110,394 $3.076,634
Total $1.822.550 $3,002.630 $18.178.403 $23.003.583 100.00% $1.319,481 $42,042 $83.656 $24.448.762 $1.345.949 $23,102.813
""tJ
Q)
CO
CD
TABLE 5
""0»
0>-
COo ALLOCATION OF METROACCESS COSTS AND REVENUES
CD (') AMONG THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA JURISDICTIONS
~w
r+
OJ -.
og ESTIMATED METROACCESS USAGE DURING FISCAL 2001:
0 Eligibility Certification
-h
(J) Trip Requests MetroAccess Trip Length Medical Testing

c Including Core Trips Completed Factor Interviews Plus Interviews
C'"
C/)
~ Jurisdiction
-<
C"'
'< Alexandria 14,048 7881 1.06 50 21
'-
c.., Arlington County 30,387 2694 1.11 222 95
(ii'
e. Fairfax City 3,301 2685 1.00 25 10
0
,.....
O· Fairfax County 119.004 84388 0.94 456 195
:J
r• 822 584 0.88 3 2
Falls Church
0
"0 Total 167,562 98,232 756 323
CD
~
OJ
ct.
::J COMPUTATION OF SUBSIDY:
(Q
Reservation! Direct Revenue:

Scheduling Operating Overhead Eligibility Eligibility Tests Completed Trips
Cost Cost Costs Interviews and Interviews Total Cost Minus Companions Su~sidy
Composite Unit Cost for Fiscal 2001 $3.01 trips completed weighted by $14.00 $65.00 $2.20 fare
trip length factor
Jurisdiction
Alexandria $42,339 $219,290 $15.398 $700 $1,380 $279,109 $15,349 $263,760
Arlington County $91,581 $78,870 $5,538 $3,108 $6,180 $185,279 $4,624 $180,655
Fairfax City $9,949 $71,107 $4,993 $350 $676 $87,076 $4,607 $82.469
Fairfax County $358,653 $2,153,087 $147,544 $6,384 $12,690 $2,678,360 $144.820 $2,533.540
Falls Church $2,478 $13,629 $957 $42 $105 $17,213 $1,003 $16.210
Total $505,000 $2,535.983 $174.430 $10,584 $21,031 $3,247,037 $170,403 $3,076.634

TABLE 6
1c'lseAL 1999 AUDIT COMPARED TO FISCAL 1999 BIU.s

AND ESTIMATED AUDIT ADJUsrMENT
» SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUJREMENTS OPERATING
0
0
m
~. PRINCE
0 DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CJTYOF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIA
::J COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH SUBTOTAL TOTAL
0 METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE
-h
-------------------------------
en
C
BILLED $78. J11.700 $21,615,968 $29,564,348 $8.996.516 513.012.892 $44.993 $24.124.553 $790.040 $46.968,994 $176.261.010
REGIONAL $65.666.713 $16.613.826 $20.249.125 58,441.167 $13.012.892 $44.993 519,479,441 $790.040 $41.768.539 SI44.298.203
C'" NON-REGIONAL $12.444.987 $5.002.142 59.315.213 S55S,349 $0 $0 $4.645,106 $0 $5.200,455 $31.962.801
~.
a. BILLING FOR NEW SERVICE $31.000 $335.000 $240,000 5240.000 $606.000
-< Oyster School Route 18 Extend Rte. 28e
CT
'< TOTAL BILLED $78.142.700 $21.950.968 $29.564.348 $9.236.516 $13,012.892 $44.993 $24.124,553 $190.040 $47.208.994 $176,861.010
L AUDIT
..,
C REGIONAL $64.014.238 $16.195,746 519,739.564 $8.228.749 $12,685.428 $43.861 $18.989.255 $770.159 $40,717.451 $140.667.000
Cir NON-REGIONAL $11.920,596 $4,791.368 $8.922.710 $531.948 $0 50 $4.449,371 $0 $4.981.325 S30.616,000
a.
o·
,....
NEW SERVICE (NON-REGIONAL)
TOTAL AUDITED
531,000
$75.965.834
$335.000
$21.322.114 $28.662.275
$140,000
S9,000,691 $12.685.428 $43,861 $23.438.632 $770.159 $45.698.776
5606.000
$171,889,000
O·
::J
,
I AUDIT ADJUSTMENT
ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT
($2,176,866)
(SI.600.000)
($628,854)
($400.000)
($902.073)
($600.000)
($235.819)
($100.000)
($327.464)
($200.000)
($1.132)
SO
($685.921)
($400,000)
(S19,881)
SO
($1,510,218)
($700.000)
($4.978,010)
($3,300,000)
0 ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($516.866) ($228.8S4) ($302.073) ($135.819) ($127.464) ($1.132) ($285.921) (519,881) ($810.218) ($1.678,010)
'U
..,
CD
METRORAll OPERATING ASSISTANCE - INCLUDES MAX FARE SUBSIDY
Q)
d.
..-......_._._•.•...._._----_.----_._-----------_........ _---.-.-
BILLED $37.412,840 $20,542.480 $16.278.828 $4.714.756 $10.682.732 $349.148 $14,914,732 $305.888 $31.037.256 5105.171.404
:::J
ce AUDIT $31.074,560 $17,209.589 $13,696.330 $3.902.619 S8,818,581 $286.458 $12.761,489 $2S5.S18 $26,024.665 $88.005.144
AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($6.338,280) ($3.332.891) ($2.582.498) ($822~131) ($1.864.151) ($62.690) ($2,213.243) ($50.370) ($5.012,591) ($17,266.260)
ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT ($6.900.000) ($3,500,000) (52.900.000) ($900.000) ($2.000,000) ($100,000) ($2.600.000) ($(00,000) ($5.10C).()oo) ($19.000.000)
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT $561.720 $167.109 $317.502 $77.863 $135.849 $37.310 $386,757 $49.630 $687.409 $1.733.740
FEDERALLY INELIGIBLE COSTS

BILLBD $863.156 $486.112 $414.672 $104.664 $224.008 $4.384 $305.188 $3.020 $641,264 $2.40S.204
AUDIT $762.134 5429.220 $366.141 $92.415 SI97,791 $3.869 $269.468 $2,665 $S66.209 $2,123,704
AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($101.022) ($56,892) ($48,531) ($12,249) ($26.217) (SSIS) ($J5.720) ($355) ($15.055) ($281,500)
ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT JY 1.2 ~ 1Q M! IQ ~ ~ 1Q 1Q
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMBNT ($101.022) ($56.892) ($48.531) ($12.149) ($26.217) ($515) ($35.720) ($355) ($75.0SS) ($281.500)
PARATRANSIT
._.....................__ ....... _---_.. __ ..
B1LLBD $4,335,220 $1.814.256 52.479,100 $171.112 $214,368 $25.512 $1.511.192 $31,344 $1.953,528 $10.582,104
AUDIT $3,314,253 $4.814.709 $2,597.604 $185.167 5201.040 $48.306 $1,411,591 $19,699 $1.865.809 SI2.592.375
"0 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($1.020.967) $3,000.453 S118,504 $14.055 ($13.328) $22.194 ($99.595) ($11.645) ($81.719) $2.010.271
W ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT ($500.000)
(C $2.600.000 $2.100.000
CD
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($520.967) $400.453 $IJ8,S04 514,055 ($13,328) $22.794 ($99.595) ($11.645) ($87.719) ($89.729)
~
00
~
TOTAL AUDIT ADJUSTMENT ($9.637.13S) ($1,018,184) ($3.414.598) ($1,056,150) ($2.231.160) ($41.543) ($3.034,479) ($82.251) (56,445,582) ($20.515.499)
ESTIMATED ADJUSTMENT (8.900.000) (1,300,000) (3.500.000) (1.000.000) (2~200.000) (100.000) (3.100.000) (100,000) (S6.500.000) • (20.200,000)
ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ($737,135) $281.816 $85,402 ($56.150) ($31.160) 558.457 $65.521 $17.749 $54.418 ($315.499)
"1J)"> TABLE 7
0)=
COo
CD 0 FISCAL 2001 SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS (1)
~Q)
00 M
_.
Ng
PRINCE
....
0
DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CITY OF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX
gn:.
FAIRFAX FALLS
en
C
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
C" METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE:

en REGIONAL $67.320.346 $22.068,469 $23,638.514 $8,420,601 $12.294.726 $148.541 $19.300.412 $653.452 $153.845,059
a: NON-REGIONAL $15,797.004 $4,490,183 $9,695,353 $1,026,984 IQ JQ $5547.987 IQ $36,557,512
-< TOTAL BUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE $83,117,350 $28.558.851 $33.333.888 $9.447.585 $12.294,728 $148.541 $24.848.399 $653,452 $190.402.571
0-
'< METRORAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE:
L BASE AlLOCATION $44,994,089 $21.958.015 $19.957.566 $5.331.953 $12.129.555 $366.214 $16.915.037 $342.301 $121.994.729
C MAX. FARE SUBSIDY $218,974 $1.607.940 $509.234 $66.491 $53.065 $33,885 $697.200 $9910 $3,196,700
-c TOTAL RAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE $45,213.083 $23.585,955 $20,488.800 $5.398.444 $12,182,820 $400,099 $17.612,237 $352.211 $125.191,429
iii"
a. PARATRANS1T $5,958,261 59,612,760 $4,582.681 $266,916 $182,070 $82,625 $2,550,304 $16,605 $23,252223
0
Z. FISCAL 2001 W/O DEBT SERVICE $134.288.674 $59.737,366 $58.383.349 $15.112.945 $24.659,415 $631.266 $45.0101940 $1.022.268 $338.846.223
0
::J
I
I DEBT SERVICE $10.331.309 $4.867,451 $4.872.948 $1.418.184 $2.740.174 $46,723 $3.168.927 $38,478 $27.484.194
0 TOTAL fiSCAL 2001 REQUIREMENT $144,619,983 $64,604,817 $83,258,297 $16.531,129 $27.399.589 $677.989 $48.179,867 51.080.748 $368,330,417
U
..,
CD
FINAL FISCAL 1999 AUDIT ADJUSTMENT (1) ($9.637.135) ($1.018.184) ($3.414,598) ($1.056.150) ($2.231.160) ($41.543) ($3.034,479) ($82.251) ($20.515,500)
Q)
~,
:;:]
co (1) Jurisdictions may use this credit for bills due in fiscal 2000; they may reserve the savings for fiscal 2001; or may use the savings for other programs
FISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS
INFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The Infrastructure Renewal Program for fiscal 2001 is supported by $677.3 million of
Federal, State, and local subsidy contributions, debt financing, and investment income.
Most of this year's program, seventy-two percent, will be funded with $481.3 million
of debt financing, similar to that established to support the 'fast-track' rail construction
program in 1991. New federal grants, including flexible funds and local match, are
programmed at $162.4 million. The repairable parts reserve and new procurements of
repairable parts will require $5.0 million of 100 percent statellocal funds. Funding of
$24.9 million from previously approved grants will be reprogrammed to the fiscal
2001 program element. The remaining funding is from investment income projected
at $1.5 million and additional local funding of $2.2 million.
Table 1 summarizes the projects in fiscal 2001 and assigns the costs to the
appropriate mode and formula allocation categories, e.g., Metrobus, Metrobus
Repairable Parts, Metrorail Category I, Metrorail Category II, and Rail Repairable Parts.
Table 2 presents the allocation of state/local requirements among the jurisdictions.
These requirements include 20 percent local match for projects funded with federal
grants, the 100 percent local funding for the depreciation of repairable parts and the
purchase of new repairable parts inventory and the additional local funding. All local
funds are expected to be billed in fiscal 2001. The following generally describes the
formulas and procedures used to allocate each cost category.
(1 ) Metrobus Capital Projects and Bus Repairable Parts
The local match for bus capital items is distributed among the local jurisdictions using
a projection of the weekday revenue bus miles. This was projected for fiscal 2001
using actual schedule data for September 1999. Table 3 presents the estimated
weekday revenue miles for fiscal 200 1.
(2) Metrorail Capital Projects - Category I
Category I projects are defined as system deficiencies including items whose actual
life is significantly less than planned and whose replacement will correct design or
quality deficiencies and extend the life of the equipment, and/or save on operating and
maintenance costs. The local share of cost for these items is allocated using the latest
estimate of the rail construction formula.
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Infrastructure and Renewal Program

Page 183
(3) Metrorail Capital Projects - Category II
Normal replacement and rehabilitation programs for the rail system in operation are
allocated among the local jurisdictions using the past five year average of rail operating
assistance percentages. The fiscal 2001 bills will use the average of rail operating
assistance distributions for Fiscal 1995 through Fiscal 1999. Table 4 presents the
fiscal 2001 distribution of category II local costs.
(4) Rail Repairable Parts: Depreciation and New Procurements
Repairable parts are part of the normal replacement and rehabilitation program. As
such, the cost is allocated in the same manner as category II costs - using the past five
year average of rail operating assistance percentages.
(5) Bus Capital One-tenth Adjustments
One-tenth of each year's billing for bus capital projects is adjusted using a distribution
of actual miles. Ten adjustments to each year's bills occur over a ten-year period.
This procedure was implemented to allow each jurisdiction's contribution to more
accurately represent the benefits received by the jurisdiction. This does not apply to
bus capital projects supported by the flexible funding program.
Table 5 presents the one-tenth adjustments using actual fiscal 1999 weekday revenue
bus miles. The adjustments are due July 1, 2000.
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Infrastructure and Renewal Program

Page 184
TABLE 1
»
o FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET
o (In thousands of dollarsl
Q)
,.....
o'
::J FUNDING SOURCES
o
-h
(J) 100% LOCAL ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT
C ALLOCATION FLEXIBLE REPAIRABLE NON-FEDERAL INCOMEI DEBT REPROGRAMMED
0- PROJECTS:
00 CATEGORY SECTION 9 SECTION 3 fUNDS PARTS FUNDING SUBTOTAL OTHER FINANCtNG fUNDING III TOTAL
Q.
-< RAIL CAR PROCUREMENT RAIL CAT. 1 $0 $24,896 $24,896
RAIL CAR REHABILITATION RAIL CAT. 2 1.902 $1,902 $408,201 $410,109
0-
'< EMERGENCY RAil REHABILITATION RAIL CAT. 2 $10,556 $10,556 $10,666
L STATION STRUCTURES &
c: EQUIPMENT REHABILITATION RAtLCAT.2 $19.042 $43,817 $62,919 $62,919
:::!. RAil MAINTENANCE RAIL CAT. 2 $2,700 $2,700 $253 $2.963
00
C- OTHER RAIL PROJECTS RAIL CAT. 2 $5.644 $10.038 $5,000 $2.162 $22.844 $14.682 $7,045 $44.671
O
.-+
o· BUS PURCHASES
ANNUAL BUS OVERHAUL
BUS MilES
BUS MilES
$1.190
$18,416
$8,064 $9,244
$18,415
$23,205 $2.674 $35,123
$18,415
::J $4,473
SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE BUS MilES $4,473 $4,473
OTHER BUS PROJECTS BUS MILES $25,085 $25,085 $26,085
JOINT BUS & RAil BUS MILES $11.373 $11,373 $1.500 $10.069 $16.225 $38.161
:J
-h
-,
OJ TOTAL $98,418 $66,817 $8,054 $5.000 $2,162 $169,511 $1,500 $481.312 $24.944 $677,267
en
..,
~
c: LOCAL MATCH:
....c:
C')
FLEXIBLE FUNDING· BUS $1,611 1,611
.., OTHER BUS ITEMS $12.107 $0 eo 12.107
CD BUS REPAIRABLE PARTS 0
Ell RAIL CATEGORY I $0 $0 $0 eo 0
:J RAIL CATEGORY II $7.588 $11,163 eo $2,162 20,914
a.
RAIL REPAIRABLE PARTS $5,000 6.000
:u
CD
0
::J TOTAL LOCAL $19,696 $11.163 $1.611 $5.000 $2.162 $39,632
CD
~ (11 The local match for reprogrammed funding was billed and paid in prior years.
Q)
\J
~
o
..,
(0
m
'1J3
Q)
en
CD
~
CO
(J1
N:\FY2001lClp12OO'CIPUW2 OW,2ItIO 2:08:5f PM

TABLE 2
-0»
w-
COo
<Do
,...
~Q)
00 _.
FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET
mg STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
0
~
en
c:
0- PRINCE
en DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
0.: COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
-<
C-
-< FLEXIBLE FUNDING MATCH:
c.. BUS PROJECTS
C
FEDERAL $2,366,465 $1,018,322 $1,402,364 $335,160 $450,552 $0 $869,109 $21,248 $6,443,200
""'"
en" LOCAL $589,114 $254,680 $350,591 $83,788 $1 t 2,638 $0 $214,777 $5,312 $1,610,800
a.
o·
,... TOTAt FLEXIBLE FUNDING $2,945,669 $1,272,902 $1,762,954 $418,938 $563,190 $0 $1,073,886 $26,560 $8,054,000
0
:J SECTION 9 MATCH:
BUS PROJECTS $4,427,936 $1,913,494 $2,635,134 &629,769 $846,617 $0 $1,614,323 $39,926 $12,107,200
RAIL CATEGORY 2 $2,784,184 $1,388,374 $1,178,023 $347,397 $794,505 $22,917 $1,050,690 $22,310 $7,588,400
::J TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH $7,212,120 $3.301,868 $3,813,157 $977,166 $1,641.123 $22,917 $2,665,013 $62.236 $19,695,600
........
-c
Q)
en
..,
r-+ SECTION 3 MATCH:
C BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0
,..... $1,733,006 $33,713 $1,546,684 $11,163,400
RAIL CATEGORY 2 $4,095,851 $2.042.456 $511,060 $1,168.808 $32,820
C
.., $1,733,006 $511,060 $1,168,808 $33,713 $1,546,684 $32,820 $11,163,400
TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH $4,095,851 $2.042.456
CD
m ADDITIONAL NON·FEDERAL:
::J
0.. BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
:0 RAil CATEGORY 2 $793.238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,629 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000
<D
::J TOTAL ADD1L. NON·FEDERAL $793,238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,529 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000
CD
~ REPAIRABLE PARTS:
Q)
BUS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
..,-0 RAIL $1,834,500 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $16,100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000.000
0 $1,834,600 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $15,100 $692,300 $14,700
CO TOTAL REPAIRABLE PARTS $5,000.000
-.
Q)
3 TOTAL LOCAL WID FLEX. $13,935,709 $6,654,683 $6,657,992 $1,816,103 $3,559,792 $78,260 $5,202,348 $116,113 $38.021,000
TOTAL LOCAL PLUS FLEX. $16,881,278 $7,927,686 $8,410,947 $2,235,041 $4,122,982 $78,260 $6,276,234 $142,673 $46,075,000
BUS CAPITAL ONE-TENTH

ADJUSTMENT ($67,888) $1,991 $81.617 ----------•••--------------.- NVTC ($1 5,720 ) ••••••-.------..---..---...•••••. $0
N:lFY2001\Clp\2001CIP1.WB2 09112/00 2:09:34 PM

TABLE 3
FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM
ESTIMATED FISCAL 2001 WEEKDAY REVENUE BUS MILES

TO ALLOCATE BUS CAPITAL PROJECTS
(J)
c WEEKDAY DECEMBER PLANNED ESTIMATED FISCAL 2001
C'" REVENUE 1999 FISCAL 2001 CHANGES WEEKDAY REVENUE MILES
en
~ MILES AS OF CHANGES GUIDELINES NEW SERVICE
-< SEPT. 20, 1999 RTE.C2 MILES DISTRIBUTION
0-
-<
L DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10,478,916 0 96,114 80,925 125,994 10,781,949 36.5727%
..,
C
Cir
C-
MONTGOMERY COUNTY 4,405,781 (50,000) 124,139 179,407 4,659,327 15.8046%
o PRINCE GEORGE1S COUNTY 6,315,138 50,000 9,849 41,520 6,416,507 21.7650%
~.
o
::l MARYLAND SUBTOTAL 10,720,919 0 9,849 165,659 179,407 11,075,834 37.5696%
:J ALEXANDRIA 1,382,946 0 31,276 45,523 73,734 1,533,478 5.2016%

..,
""""h
ARLINGTON COUNTY 1,883,187 0 42,589 61,989 73,734 2,061,499 6.9927%
m
en FAIRFAX CITY 0 0 0 0
..,
rl
FAIRFAX COUNTY 3,722,027 0 86,303 122,519 3,930,849 13.3336%
C
o
,..... FALLS CHURCH 94,122 0 0 3,098 97,220 0.3298%
c:
~
0
CD 7,082,282 0 160,168 233,129 147,467 7,623,046 25.8576%
VIRGINIA SUBTOTAL
0>
::J
C.
::n TOTAL 28,282,117 0 266,131 406,752 452,868 29,480,829 100.0000%
CD
::J
CD
~
0>
..,-0
o
co
..,
Q)
""03
m
(C
CD
N:\FY2001\Clp\2001CIP1.WB2 09112/00 2:16:12 PM

TABLE 4
"""0»
0)-
COo RSCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM
CD 0
~Q) ALLOCATION OF LOCAL MATCH FOR RAIL RELIABILITY PROJECTS· CATEGORY 2
00 r_.l
oog
0
-h PRINCE
(J) DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
C COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
tT
(f)
c:
-< DISTRIBUTION OF
0- RAil OPERATING
-< ASSISTANCE:
L
C FY1981 45.13% 10.69% 16.39% 3.3696 14.99% 0.29% 8.77% 0.38% 100.00%
~
en' FV1982 45.18% 10.5396 16.76% 3.27% 14.23% 0.29% 9.39% 0.35% 100.00%
a. FY1983 47.381)6 10.67% 16.15% 3.26% 13.72% 0.29% 8.329& 0.31% 100,0096
O· FY1984 46.1996 10.44% 16.08% 4.63% 13.04% 0.26% 9.18% 0.28% 100.00%
&""'+
O· FY1985
FY1986
43.24%
41.87%
14.96%
17.19%
14.70%
14.38%
6.28%
5.04%
11.78%
11.29%
0.25%
0.26%
9.56%
9.71%
0.23%
0.26%
100.00%
100.00%
::J
FY1987 40.11% 16.91% 14.23% 4.70% 11.32% 0.30% 12.18% 0.2596 100.00%
FY1988 39.97% 16.95% 14.34% 4.6996 11.25% 0.30% 12.24% 0.26% 100.00%
::::J FY1989 39.89% 17.03% 14.26CJ& 4.58% 11.7096 0.31% 11.97% 0.27% 100.0096
..,
-h
Q)
FY1990 39.61% 16.9396 14.66% 4.64% 11.49% 0.32% 12.21% 0.25% 100.00%
FY1991 38.43% 18.03% 14.36% 4.68% 11.50% 0.33% 12.37% 0.30% 100.00%
,...-,en FY1992 39.38% 17.77% 14.05% 4.86% 10.90% 0.34% 12.41% 0.30% 100.00%
C FY1993 41.52% 17.34% 13.77% 4.64% 10.38% 0.31% 11.80% O.241jf, 100.00%
() FY1994 37.4396 18.54% 14.47% 4.6696 10.68% 0.30% 13.63% 0.29% 100.00%
I"""f'
36.92% 18.28% 15.43% 4.62% 0.29%
...,
C FY1995
FY1996 36.7996 18.32% 16.51% 4.61%
10.58%
10.64% 0.31%
13.58%
13.63%
0.30%
0.29%
100.00%
100.00%
CD
FY1997 36.84% 18.28% 16.66% 4.60% 10.61% 0.31% 13.61% 0.29% 100.00%
Q)
:::J FY1998 36.51% 18.11% 16.56% 4.54% 10.40% 0.30% 14.22% 0.30% 100.00%
C. FY1999 36.33% 18.49% 15.66% 4.52% 10.32% 0.30% 14.19% 0.2996 100.00%
:JJ
CD FIVE YEAR AVE.:
:::J
CD
11.44%
~
FY1981-1985 45.42% 16.02% 3.94% 13.65% 0.28% 9.04% 0.31% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1987 COMMITMENTS
Q) FV1982-1986 44.77% 12.74% 16.61% 4.28% 12.81% 0.27% 9.23% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1988 COMMtTMENTS
FY1983·1987 43.76% 14.01% 15.11% 4.56% 12.23% 0.27% 9.79% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1989 COMMITMENTS
"'1J FY1984·1988 42.28% 15.29% 14.75% 4.85% 11.74% 0.27% 10.57% 0.26% 100,00% USED TO Bill FY1990 COMMITMENTS
0"""" FY1986·1989 41.02% 16.61% 14.38% 4.86% 11.47% 0.28% 11.13% 0.26% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1991 COMMITMENTS
CO
-, FY1986·1990 40.27% 17.00% 14.37% 4.73% 11.41% 0.30% 11.66% 0.26% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1992 COMMITMENTS
Q) FY1987·1991 39.58% 17.17% 4.66% 12.19%
14.37% 11.45% 0.31% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1993 COMMITMENTS
3 FY 1988·1992 39.44% 17.34% 14.33% 4.69% 11.31% 0.32% 12.2496 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1994 COMMITMENTS
FY 1989-1993 39.75% 17.42% 14.22% 4.68% 11.1996 0.32% 12.16% 0.27% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1996 COMMITMENTS
FY1990·1994 39.25% 17.72% 14.26CJ6 4.69% 10.99CJ6 0.32% 12.48% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1996 COMMITMENTS
FY1991·1996 38.74% 17.99% 14.42% 4.69% 10.81% 0.31% 12.16% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY1991 COMMITMENTS
FY1992-1996 38.41% 18.05% 14.65% 4.68% 10.62% 0.31% 13.01% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY1998 COMMITMENTS
FY1993-1997 37,90% 18.15% 14.95% 4.63% 10.54% 0.30% 13.26% 0.28% 100.00% USED TO BILL FY1999 COMMITMENTS
FY1994-1998 36.91% 18.31% 15.31% 4.61% 10.54% 0.30% 13.73% 0.29% 100.00% USED TO BilL FY2000 COMMITMENTS
FY1996·1999 36.69% 18.30% 16.52% 4.58% 10.47% 0.30% 13.86% 0.2996 100.0096 USED TO BILL FY2001 COMMITMENTS
N.\FV200"Cip\200fClPUVB2 mv'2IOO '2:f5:Ofi PM

TABLE 5
» FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE AND RENEWAL PROGRAM

0
(')
,...
Q) BUS CAPITAL 1/10th ADJUSTMENTS
o· FY 1999 ADJUSTMENT
:3
0 Prince
-h
en District of Montgomery George's Northern
c 1/10th of Original Billing Columbia County County Virginia Total
C"
en
a:
"< FY1990 - 10th ADJUST $272.986 $94.553 $108,959 $178,302 $654.800
0'" FY1991 - 9th ADJUST $154.925 $55,549 $67.880 $103,424 $381,778
-< FY1992 - 8th ADJUST $188,556 $70.112 $84,239 $129.547 $472,454
L
c:
...., FY1993 - 7th ADJUST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Cj;" FY1994 - 6th ADJUST $32,110 $11,207 $15,199 $22,285 $80.801
c. FY1995 - 5th ADJUST $157,558 $57,049 $79.149 $108,108 $401,864
0
~. FY1996 - 4th ADJUST $123.587 $47,838 $73,300 $85.849 $330,574
0 FY1997 - 3rd ADJUST $104,436 $41,258 $62,080 $72,235 $280,008
:::J
FY1998 - 2nd ADJUST $70,554 $27,150 $43.174 $47,247 $188,126
FY1999 -1st ADJUST $305,995 $119,044 $187.623 $203,338 $816,000
:J
....,
""""h
Q) $1.410,707 $523,759 $721,603 $950.336 $3.606,405
en
..,
~
c FY1999 DISTRIBUTION
,...
()
OF ACTUAL WEEKDAY
c:
....,
CD REVENUE MILES 37.2343% 14.5782% 22.27200/0 25.9154% 100.0000%
Q)
::J
C.
:Xl REVISED DISTRIBUTION $1,342.819 $525.750 $803,220 $934,615 $3,606,405
CD
::J
CD
~ ADJUSTMENT DUE
w
JULY 1,2000 ($67,888) $1.991 $81.617 ($15.720) $0
..,
'1J
0
co
..,
m
"1J3
Q)
(Q
CD
~
00
CD
FISCAL 2001 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS

RAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
THE FORMULA
On January 9, 1970, WMATA, the Washington Suburban Transit District (WSTD) in

Maryland, the counties of Arlington and Fairfax in Virginia, the cities of Alexandria,
Fairfax, and Falls Church in Virginia, and the District of Columbia executed a Capital
Contributions'Agreement which established the basis for local contributions for the rail
construction program. Included in the document is a Guaranty Agreement between
WMATA and Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland guaranteeing full
and prompt payment by the WSTD.
The Agreement sets out a formula to allocate all local costs, with the exception of add-
on costs, for the Adopted Regional System (ARS) using four sets of percent
distributions:
1
Weight Given
Factor To Each Factor Factor Description
Construction 40% Cost in 1969 dollars to place construction

in each signatory.
Service 30% 1990 train miles and stations in each
. 2
signatory .
Ridership 15% 1990 ridership in each signatory's area.
Population 15% 1990 population within the Transit Zone.
The term Ilsignatory" in the factor description refers to the signatories to the WMATA
interstate compact, namely, the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, and the
Commonwealth of Virginia. The construction and service factors are computed after
eliminating the costs, stations, and train miles attributable to the Modified Sector Zero
(MSO) portion of the system. This means that each jurisdiction shares in the cost of
sector zero in proportion to its share of non-sector zero cost, stations, and train miles.
The geographic boundaries as agreed to in 1970 are:
1 The allocation to Virginia is computed using the factors as weighted on the above chart. The
suballocation among the Virginia jurisdictions weights each factor 25 percent.
2 Within the service factor, the weighting of the components has been 7.5% for station distributions and
22.5% for train mile distributions.
Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Rail Construction Program

Page 190
• Northern boundary - The Potomac River east to Rock Creek and up to L Street;
east on L Street to
• Eastern boundary - First Street, N.E.; south on First Street to
• Southern boundary - Southwest Freeway to the vicinity of 6th Street, S.W.,
southerly to the D.C./Virginia boundary, then westerly to and including the
Pentagon;
• Western boundary - along a line from the Pentagon north to the intersection of
Wilson Boulevard and Fort Myer Drive and east to the Potomac River.
The initial set of data used for the allocation formula was developed from the 1969
Net Income Analysis Study, Council of Governments (MWCOG) population forecasts
for 1990, and engineering cost estimates for the entire construction program. This
was used to compute the Schedule A, Capital Receipts Schedule (the original payment
schedule) in the Capital Contributions Agreement. Revisions to the data base that
actually adjusted billin,g to the jurisdictions were implemented as follows:
• In 1974, jurisdiction payments were re-allocated using 1990 ridership and train
mile forecasts for the 98 mile system prior to the addition of the Shady Grove
Road extension. The data was developed as part of the 1974 Net Income
Analysis Study and included revised MWCOG population projections for 1990
and revised base year dollar costs (1969 dollars) for the Adopted Regional
System.
• In 1978, MWCOG concluded an extensive Alternatives Analysis Study on all

unbuilt segments of the Adopted Regional System, except the segment from
3
Silver Spring to Glenmont • This effort essentially reaffirmed the need for the
ARS and recommended several changes in alignments. Using much of the data
developed for the Alternatives Analysis Study, WMATA contracted for a
Detailed Financial Analysis (DFA) for the 101 mile system. DFA forecasts of
1990 ridership and 1990 train miles were used in the allocation formula for
ICCA-II, ICCA-III, and ICCA-IV.
• In 1982, a jurisdiction task force was appointed by the WMA TA Board to

review the formula data for an amendment to ICCA-Ili. The task force agreed
to use updated construction costs for the 1 01 mile system and the MWCOG
Round 3 population forecasts for 1990. Due to concerns regarding the
assumptions and bases used for the 1980 Net Income Analysis Study, the task
force agreed to continue using the 1978 DFA data for the service factor of the
formula.
3 UMTA, now FTA, conceded the need for this segment prior to the Alternative Analysis and required
only an engineering analysis on this segment.

Page 191
• In 1991, the WMATA Board appointed a jurisdiction task force to review the
formula data and procedures in order to develop the payment schedule for
ICCA-V. Concurrent with this effort, WMATA completed a financial analysis
study for the 103 mile system using the MWCOG forecast year of 201 0 to
determine the ridership, population, and service factors. The task force could
not reach consensus on the appropriate forecast year to use' as the basis for the
final computation of local shares. It was agreed that the commitment schedule
in ICCA-V should be updated every two years until the system is completed and
that the data used to update the population and ridership factors of the formula
would be based on a 50%/50% composite of the latest FAS year 2010 data
and the best available current population and ridership data. The actual and
projected data for population and ridership should converge over time, thereby
minimizing the final recomputation. The Board of Directors also approved the
allocation of the Southern Avenue Station in the service factor of the formula
to the District of Columbia and Prince George's County using peak period
boardings by jurisdiction of residence. Table 1 shows the distribution for each
factor in the formula as updated in December 1995.
THE CONSTANT DOLLAR CONCEPT
In 1981, a jurisdiction task force developed a payment schedule for ICCA-1I1. ICCA-1I1
was to complete funding for nearly 75 miles of the Metro System:
Shady Grove to Silver Spring on the Red Line;

Vienna to New Carrollton on the Orange Line;
Huntington to Addison Road on the Blue Line; and
the southern Potomac River crossing (Fenwick Bridge) between Gallery
Place and the Pentagon on the Yellow Line.
There was considerable concern that most of the unfunded system segments were in
Maryland and the District of Columbia. Annual payments in previous contributions
agreements had been allocated among the jurisdictions based on each jurisdiction's
share of the ARS formula. The concept put forth by Maryland DOT staff was that the
payment schedule should in some way reflect the rate at which construction
progressed or work was funded in each jurisdiction.
It was agreed that the rail construction formula for the full ARS must remain intact.
The formula would determine the ceiling or maximum amount that each jurisdiction
would pay for the ARS. However, the annual payments due from each jurisdiction for
ICCA-III would be computed using data for that portion of the system funded through
ICCA-1I1 (nearly 75 miles). The same allocation formula would be used, but the data
base would be for a projected 75 mile system.
The impact of this precedure was to bill at a faster rate those jurisdictions that had all

Page 192
or most of their system funded through ICCA-III, because they would have a higher
percentage of a 75 mile system than of a 103 mile system. The jurisdictions that
would pay faster expressed concern that they would be paying in more expensive
dollars. It was then agreed that:
1. All costs associated with construction of the system (ARS) beginning with
December 1, 1981 would be computed in 1981 dollars;
2. The allocation of the share each jurisdiction must pay for the total ARS would
be computed in 1981 dollars;
3. Annual local payments would be computed in current dollars;
4. Payments made prior to ICCA-1I1 would be reallocated using the allocation for
the 75 mile system and any adjustments would be phased in over a five-year
period;
5. Each payment would be devalued to 1981 dollars using the WMA TA
construction index (January 1981 = 100) for the month of the payment;
6. When the 1981 dollar value of a jurisdiction's payments reaches its total share
of the ARS (Step 2), that jurisdiction, in essence, would be paid up unless there
are changes to system scope, unanticipated changes in base year (1 981 ) dollar
costs, or changes in the federal/local match ratio.
This concept and the same procedures have been used to develop the ICCA-IV
payment schedule using a data base for the 89.5 mile system and the ICCA-V Local
Commitments Schedule using a data base for the 103 mile system.
ICCA-V BILLING PROCEDURES
All jurisdictions have provided all the required written commitments for the fast-track
program. The level of commitment among the jurisdictions may be modified every two
years. ICCA-V requires a recomputation of each jurisdiction's commitment every two
years based on updated data in the allocation formula. The fiscal 2001 expenditure
ceiling is based on an update in November 1997 of the construction factor and the
MWCOG round V.4 population forecast for year 2010. Exhibit 4 shows actual
commitments through fiscal 1999.
The local funding agreements between WMATA and each Political

Subdivision/Guarantor require that a cumulative monthly billing ceiling be established
and incorporated into the annual budget. The billing ceiling for fiscal 2001 is
presented on the following page.

Page 193
\1»
m-
co-
eD g
~a>
(0 r-+
_.
~g EXHIBIT 4 - REVISED RCPMT -95 12-Sep-OO
0
-h
en
c METRORAIL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS SCHEDULE
rr
(J)
LOCAL COMMITMENTS TO FUND THE LOCAL MATCH FOR P.L. 101-551
lc
'<
Cj FIFTH INTERIM CAPJTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AGREEMENT
-<
L (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
C
-.,
Cii·
C. ADD-ONS IN THE SERVICE FACTOR
o·
r-+
SOUTHERN AVENUE - 73% PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
o· - 27% DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

::J
PROGRAM DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY PRINCE MARYLAND ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIA
::JJ YEAR COLUMBIA COUNTY GEORGE'S CO SUBTOTAL ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH SUBTOTAL TOTAL
Q)
-
n
0
::J
rJ)
FISCAL 1992 17.689.74 12.034.73 13.228.18 25,262.91 1.552.08 3.656.97 34.54 9.096.48 19.28 14.359.35 57.312.00
...,
r-+
FISCAL 1993 28.358.87 19.293.17 21.206.43 40.499.60 2.488.18 5.862.58 55.38 14,582.79 30.90 23.019.83 91.878.30
c
0 FISCAL 1994 36,817.44 25.047.69 27,531.64 52,579.33 3,230.29 7.611.19 71.93 18,932.43 40.08 29.885.92 119,282.69
,...+
FISCAL 1995 37,424.20 25.579.53 27,622.10 53,201.63 3.219.56 7.313.11 111.91 18,066.59 63.00 28,774.17 119,400.00
0 FISCAL 1996 37,424.20 25,579.53 27,622.10 53.201.63 3.219.56 7.313.11 111.91 18.066.59 63.00 28,774.17 119,400.00
::J
FISCAL 1997 39,219.85 23.664.19 32,290.77 55.954.96 2,261.88 6,594.86 111.90 15.193.57 62.98 24,225.19 119,400.00
""U
-., FISCAL 1998 39.219.85 23.664.19 32,290.77 55.954.96 2,261.88 6.594.86 111.90 15.193.57 62.98 24.225.19 119,400.00
0 FISCAL 1999 11,486.90 9.459.20 1.926.50 11.385.70 (239.40) 3,276.90 28.20 4,093.00 15.90 7,174.60 30.047.20
co
...,
Q)
3 --- --- ---- - - - - - - - ----- ----- - - - - - - -

TOTAL 247,641.05 164.322.23 183.718.49 348,040.72 17.994.03 48.223.58 637.67 113,225.02 358.12 180.438.42 776.120.19
RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET • 103 MILE SYSTEM
CUMULATIVE MONTHLY CEILING FOR FISCAL 2001 CASH PAYMENTS
»
o
(')
Q)
PRINCE
,..... DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS VIRGINIA
o'
j
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL TOTAL
o-t\ FISCAL 2001 ESTIMATE OF BILLS:
JULY 2000 4.279.090 2.723.330 3.164,130 219.468 788.548 12.071 1.681.064 6.799 2.707.950 12,874.500
AUGUST 2000 6.552.497 4,170,189 4.845.177 336.067 1,207.490 18.484 2.574,185 10,411 4,146,637 19.714,500
SEPTEMBER 2000 9,147,471 5.821.701 6,764,005 469,159 1.685,690 25,805 3.593,635 14,534 5.788.823 27.522.000
OCTOBER 2000 10.984,643 6.990,928 8.122.483 563,384 2.024,243 30.988 4.315,378 17.453 6,951.446 33.049,500
NOVEMBER 2000 13.402.630 8,529.801 9,910.439 687,399 2.469.829 37.809 5.265.298 21,295 8,481,629 40,324,500
DECEMBER 2000 18,114,764 10.255,878 11,915.900 826,500 2.969.619 45,460 6,330.775 25,604 10.197,958 48.484,500
JANUARY 2001 17,883,385 11.381,477 13.223,688 917.210 3,295,540 50,449 7,025.587 28,415 11.317,200 53,805,750
FEBRUARY 2001 19,633.310 12,495,177 14.517.653 1,006,960 3.618.015 55.385 7.713,055 31,195 12.424,610 59,070,750
MARCH 2001 21.6071584 13,751,659 15,977,510 1.108,218 3,981,833 60,955 8.488,660 34,332 13,673.997 651010.750
APRil 2001 23.011.014 14.644,840 17,015.262 1.180,197 4,240,456 64.914 9.040,005 36,562 14.582,134 69.233,250
MAY 2001 24,577,721 15.641.935 18,173,747 1,260,551 4,529.168 69,333 9.655.494 39,051 15.553.597 73.947,000
JUNE 2001 26,579,415 16.915.869 19,653,880 1,363,215 4,898,039 741980 10,441.871 42.231 16,820,336 79,969,500
::0
Q)
n
o
j
,..en-,
c::
(')
~.
o
:::J
..,"1J
o
co
.,
Q)
lJ
Q)
ro
CD
This Page Not Used

Page 196
RESOLUTIONS OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
Resolutions of the Board of Directors

Page 197
This Page Not Used
Resolutions of the Board of Directors

Page 198
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
1. Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula (98-27)
2. Non-Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation (98-32)
3. Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement (98-38)
4. Operating Budget Reprogramming Policy (99-21)
5. Paratransit Formula (99-31)
6. Fiscal 2001 Guidelines and Assumptions (99-41)
7. Create an Integrated Annual Work Program (99-55)
8. Reimbursable Project Policy and Project Reserve Funds (99-63)
9. Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services (00-10)
10. Fiscal 2001 - 2006 Infrastructure Renewal Program (OO-34)
11. Extension of Metrorail Operating Hours (00-39) ,
12. Fiscal Year 2001 Operating Budget (00-40)
13. Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions (00-41)
14. Changes to the Procurement Statement (00-42)
15. Revised IRP Reprogramming Policy (00-43)
16. 103 mile Rail Capital Program BUdget - Fiscal 2001 (00-44)
11. System Improvement and Expansion Program Budget - Fiscal 2001 (00-45)
17. Carryover Fiscal 2000 IRP Funds into Fiscal 2001 (00-47)
Page 199
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 25, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF METROBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION FORMULA
#98-27
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, was
charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National
Capital Region; and
WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula and

its impact on the future o.f Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMP
concluded the following in regard to the current formula:
• it relies on outdated information and reduces management1s ability to

implement system cost savings because these actions may result in cost
increases in some jurisdictions; and .
• jurisdictions that reduce bus service save more than the resulting system
savings and jurisdictions that increase bus service pay more than the
resulting system increases; and
• as Metrobus service is reduced in anyone jurisdiction, the unit costs for

all remaining bus service increases resulting in cost increases in
jurisdictions that do not change their service; and
WHEREAS, the RMP has recommended, and the Board of Directors has agreed,
that a revised Metrobus subsidy allocation formula for regional Metrobus service be
implemented beginning in Fiscal 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Board anticipates that the Member Jurisdictions will agree that
conversion to the new' Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula will begin in Fiscal 1999
with phased transition limits during the period of Fiscal 1999-2002 (as previously
Page 200
adopted by the Regional Mobility Panel) and that the phased non-federal share of
funding for the $100 million rehabilitation and replacement shortfall requirements will
begin in Fiscal 2000 and continue through Fiscal 2003. Beginning in Fiscal 1999, and
in every year thereafter, the benefit to all Member Jurisdictions from the application
of phased transition limits .in the new Regional Bus Service Operating Subsidy
Allocation Formula will be reduced proportionate to the lowest percentage contribution
made by any benefitting Member Jurisdiction to the phased non-federal shortfall in the
Rehabilitation and Replacement Program, including any state funds attributable to that
jurisdiction.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the current Metrobus subsidy

allocation formula be revised, as recommended by the RMP and agreed to by the Board
of Directors, and that a new Metrobus subsidy allocation formula be implemented
through a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts a new Metrobus

Subsidy Allocation Formula that: allocates the regional Metrobus subsidy on a regional
basis; uses data that can be periodically updated; allocates the Metrobus subsidy
based on benefits received in each jurisdiction; and evaluates carefully the mechanisms
to implement a ridership incentive factor; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following Metrobus Subsidy Allocation

Formula for regional Metrobus services shall be adopted based on each jurisdiction's
share of the following four factors:
• 25 % of Subsidy - a weighted average of urbanized population and

population density using 1990 census data and the 1990 population
definition of the urbanized area;
• 15% of Subsidy - weekday ridership on the regional routes by jurisdiction

of residence;
• 35 % of Subsidy - annual revenue miles for the regional routes; and
• 25 % of Subsidy - annual revenue hours for the regional routes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts the attached

transition limits to be applied to each jurisdiction for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal 2002
as the basis for phasing in the revised Metrobus Regional Subsidy Allocation Formula;
and
Page 201
J urisdiclion Annual Regional Metrobus Subsidies With Transition Limit
Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2002
District of Columbia 65,136 65.095 65,054 65,013
Montgomery County 17,686 18,430 19,174 19,918

Prince George's County 20,350 21.241 22,132 23,Q23
Maryland 38,036 39,671 41,306 42,941
Alexandria 8,402 8,084 7,765 7,447

Arlington County 13,013 12,491 11,970 11,448
Fairfax City 45 90 135 180
Fairfax County 18.877 18,148 17,420 16,691
Falls Church 790 719 649 578
Virginia 41,127 39,533 37,938 36,344
Total 144,298 144,298 144,298 144,298

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation
Formula, as modified by the transition limits prescribed for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal ~
200~ attached hereto, shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shall remain in effect
until changed by the Board of Directors; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective

immediately.
Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.
J?~
Robert L. Poll<
General Counsel
Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mrs. Walker
and Mr. Kinlaw
...
Page 203
PRESENTED: JUNE 25, 1998
ADOPTED; JULY 9, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NON-REGIONAL METAOBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION
#98-32
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (AMP), created in January 1997, was
charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National
Capital Region; and
WHEREAS, the RMP recommended a new Metrobus service plan based on the
development of regional and non-regional bus routes so that neither the regional bus
subsidy nor any individual jurisdiction's subsidy is affected by any change that might
occur in non-regional services except for the jurisdiction proposing the change; and
WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula and

its impact on the future of Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMP
proposed a new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus services
beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002, with specified annual
transition limits; and
WHEREAS, based on the recommendations of the RMP, the Board of Directors

has approved a revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus
service to be implemented through a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 and
continuing through Fiscal 2002; and
WHEREAS, Metrobus subsidies are determined separately for regional and non-
regional Metrobus services; and
WHEREAS, as a result of approval by the Board of Directors of a new Metrobus

Subsidy Allocation Formula for Regional Metrobus service only, a new subsidy
allocation mechanism for non-regional Metrobus services must be approved beginning
in Fiscal 1999.
Page 204
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Metrobus subsidy for non-regional
Metrobus service shall be computed by utilizing the following steps:
1. Identify the costs of a.1f Metrobus service, regional and non-regional;
2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no non-
regional bus service were provided;
3. Determine the costs of non-regional service by subtracting the regional

Metrobus costs from the costs of all Metrobus service;
4. Divide the costs for non-regional service as computed in step three by total
platform hours for non-regional service;
5. Jdentify the non-regional platform hours for each jurisdiction;
6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate.
7. Determine the revenue for each jurisdiction; and
8. Subtract the revenue as determined in step seven from costs.
The product from the process, as outlined above, equals subsidy by jurisdiction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation process

for Non-Regional Metrobus services shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shall
remain in effect until changed by the Board of Directors; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately.
!ku~/-!~ ZJIt&
Robert L. Polk
General couns:

Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmennan, and Mr. Evans
Page 205
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: AUGUST 13, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT
#98-38
Resolution
of the
Board of Directors
of the
WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress, in the 1997 U. S. Department of Transportation

Appropriations Act, directed the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to
conduct an independent study to analyze how to meet current and future bus transportation needs
for the greater Washington metropolitan region through the year 2020; and
WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors appointed the Regional Mobility Panel, a
group of regional government, business, labor and citizen leaders, in January 1997 and charged
that panel with the responsibility of addressing the concerns expressed by Congress concerning
the rising costs and fragmentation of regional bus services; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel provided its recommendations on improving

regional mobility and on transit funding in two reports to the WMATA Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors reviewed the reports and recommendations of the
Regional Mobility Panel and accepted them for implementation in cooperation with the local
jurisdictions of the Washington metropolitan area;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Member Jurisdictions have worked to develop an
Inter-Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and
Replacement Program that will implement the recommendations of the Regional Mobility Panel;
and
WHEREAS, the Agreement will delineate responsibilities for the planning, funding and
service delivery of Regional and Non-Regional Bus Services, establish a new funding formula for
Regional Bus Services similar to the regional Metrorail formula, create a Coordinated Service
Planning process to provide for the efficient integration of bus services in the Transit Zone, and
provide for certain pledges regarding the adequacy of funding and the maintenance of average
bus passenger fares and Regional bus subsidies through FY 2002 for the same level of Regional
bus service; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement establishes a commitment by the Member Jurisdictions to

pursue, support and implement necessary legislative and other actions in the Member
Jurisdictions, the states and the federal government to fully fund the average annual $100 million
t
shortfall in the WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program; and

Page 206
WHEREAS, the Member Jurisdictions have approved and signed the Inter-Jurisdictional
Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the Inter-
Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement
Program and authorizes the Chairman of the Board to execute the Agreement on behalf of the
Authority;
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective immediately.
Robert L. Polk, General Counsel

Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mrs. Mason
Page 207
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 13, 1999
SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING POLICY
#99-21
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors approves an annual operating

budget by department and by expense category and establishes the total number of
authorized positions for the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors has approved Resolution #97-31

(Attachment A) establishing procurement procedures and providing thresholds for
procurements which require approval of the Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, in approving the Fiscal 1999 Operating Budget (Resolution #97-21,

Attachment B), the Authority Board of Directors resolved that expenditures which
exceed $25 thousand for programs not defined or provided for in the budget shall
require Board approval; and
WHEREAS, from time to time approval by the Board of Directors may be

required for adjustments to approved staffing and expenditure levels;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following actions affecting the

I
operating budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior to
submission to the Board of Directors:
• Any action that requires an increase in the total number of positions

Authority-wide; and
• Any action that requires a transfer of funds between the personnel and
.non-personnel categories of expense; and
• Any action which meets the threshold for Board approval and results in
a cumulative increase of $200,000 in operating funds during the fiscal
year:
• from other than the category in which it is budgeted; or
• from other than the department in which it is budgeted; or
• in excess of the amount budgeted for any given category in any
department; and
• Any professional and technical services contracts over $50,000 and any
unbudgeted professional and technical services contracts over $10,000;
and
Page 208
• Any expenditures which exceed $25 thousand for programs not defined
or provided for in the budget and/or any new initiative which has out year
operating budget impacts; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective

immediately.
Rev·ewed as to form and legal sufficiency.
.A
Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmennan, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett
,.'
Page 209
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARATRANSIT FORMULA'
# 99-31
RESOLUTION
OFTHE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Cor:nmittee has reviewed the current four-
tiered formula used to determine each jurisdiction's 'share of the MetroAccess subsidy and has
concluded that a new allocation formula is needed; and
WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed and agrees with changes to the
MetroAccess formula as proposed by the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Committee; and
WHEREAS, the proposed MetroAccess formula more accurately assigns the cost of the
MetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, beginning with fiscal 2000, WMATA's

MetroAccess costs will be allocated among the District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince
George's Counties in Maryland, and Northern Virginia as an entity, as follows:
• Direct Costs - the contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation, and eligibility
charges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and
• Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocated in
proportion to the direct costs; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and Fairfax
Counties, and the Cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined an appropriate
procedure for WMATA to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia:
• Direct Costs - per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of trips
provided for each jurisdiction; and
• Overhead Costs - these costs will be allocated within Northern Virginia based on the
direct costs as calculated for each jurisdiction; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall become effective for fiscal 2000 and
shall remain in effect for subsequent fiscal years unless changed by the Board of Directors; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately.
Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.

~~,'Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JULY 22, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROPOSED GUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS
#99-41
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the General Manager has proposed guidelines and assumptions for
developing the Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget and the Fiscal 2001-2006 Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee recommends approval of such

guidelines and assumptions.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approve the

Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Guidelines and Assumptions
contained in Attachment A; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon approval of the Board of Directors this

resolution shall become effective immediately.
,
Cheryl C. rke
General Counsel

~i(~o§,'~JfQttc1~~1cMftiR~e5'~dMr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett
Page 211
July 22, 1 999
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED FISCAL 2001 BUDGET
GUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS
The General Manager will present the Proposed. Operating Budget and Capital
Improvement Program requests, including jurisdictional allocations, to the Board
Budget Committee in December 1999.
Operating Budget
The proposed operating budget will include a summary of each program, personnel
and non-personnel costs, revenues, staffing levels, and an explanation of significant
changes from the prior year budget.
All buses, trains and equipment must be operated and maintained in a manner to
ensure customer and employee safety.
There will be no fare increase.
Continue integration of bus and rail passenger revenues.
The Outer Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue will begin operations in
March 2001.
The total su.bsidies for bus, rail and paratransit service shall not exceed $313.2 million
(exclusive of debt service), except for:
• the addition of inflation on the subsidy of Metrorail service; and
• the annualization of service approved in fiscal 2000; and
• any new services added in fiscal 2001, including the opening of the Outer
Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue, and any service associated
with the bus service guidelines.
All federal mandates will be funded.
Proposals will be made for service options to accommodate increasing ridership

demands on existing service levels.
Proposals will also be made to enhance and expand existing service levels to further
encourage increased ridershio.
Page 212
Capital Improvement Program
"
The CIP will include a summary indicating the cost of projects, source of funds, other
budget and staffing requirements, the local jurisdictional contributions in support of
the fiscal 2001 program, and an explanation of the changes compared to fiscal 2000-
2005.
System preservation and safety will continue to be the top priorities.
Assume continuation of a $25 million ramp-up in fiscal 2001, per the

Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement.
The CIP will cover fiscal 2001 for approval purposes, fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2006
for planning purposes, and fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2010 for information purposes.
No funds should be requested in fiscal 2001 for planning or execution of projects that
are not reasonably expected to be committed in fiscal 2001. Any funds not
committed in fiscal 1999 should be separately identified and proposed to the Board
for consideration as part of the fiscal 2001 budget.
Staffing
There will be no increase in Authority-wide positions in fiscal 2001 except for new
services and any Board approved reimbursable projects.
Proposed Authority-wide staffing changes and position conversions will be separately

and specifically identified.
Reimbursable orojects and staffing for reimbursable projects will be separately and
specifically identified.
Page 213
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: SEPTEMBER 23, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO INTEGRATE FOUR CONSULTANT SERVICES
CONTRACTS INTO A CONSORTIUM OF INTERESTS AND CREATE AN
INTEGRATED ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM
#99-55
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Authority has entered into four separate contracts with
DMJM/DeLeuw Cather, JV, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Raytheon and Booz Allen &
Hamilton for professional and technical services; and
WHEREAS, the four contracts provide professional services to eleven internal

clients, and the services are funded from several funding sources; and
WHEREAS, the four contracts have various expiration dates, with Contract
3Z800A and 32800B expiring in August of 2003, Contract 3Z203A expiring in June
of 2003, and Contract FG-1451 expiring in June of 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Authority's CIP program is a six year program, and terminates
in June of 2005; and
WHEREAS, the professional services provide the greatest benefit to the

Authority if they are coterminous with the CIP program; and
WHEREAS, wide ranging professional services are provided in the most

expedient and cost-effective manner when coordinated through a single entity; and
WHEREAS, the four existing contractors have agreed to form a consortium

called Capital Transit Consultants (eTC) and executed an agreement to provide a
single administrative and management team to WMATA; and
WHEREAS, the four contractors have further agreed to an extension to their

contracts through June, 2005, which will make them coterminous with the CIP
program; and
WHEREAS, the extension of the contracts beyond a five year period has been
approved by FTA; and
Page 1 of 2
Page 214
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THATTHE Board of Directors desires that
the Authority obtain its consulting services in the most beneficial and cost-effective
manner; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the General Manager to

approve the consortium concept by endorsing the agreement reached by the
Consortium to provide WMATA a single entity for the management and coordination
of the consulting services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the execution of contract

modifications to the four existing contracts to extend the period of performance
through June 2005 to be coterminous with the Capital Improvement Program; and

implement a six-year Integrated Annual Work program subject to annual approval of
funding; and

implement the first year of the integrated annual work program; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the funding requirements in excess of: total

budget approved tor the program; funding approved by individual funding sources; and
amounts budgeted tor projects or category shall require Board approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be effective immediately.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham & Mr. Barnett
Page 2 of 2
Page 2·15
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
REIMBURSABLE PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT RESERVE FUNDS
#99-63
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, from time to time the Authority is called upon to provide assistance
and services on behalf of the local jurisdictions, state governments, and other entities;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors encourages staff to support, to the extent

possible, requests by the local jurisdictions and state governments that are of benefit
to the Authority, provided that such projects do not affect the approved annual
operating, capital improvement program or rail construction budgets or subsidies; and
WHEREAS, over the past several years, the number and complexity of
reimbursable project requests have been increasing so as to require a definitive set
of policy guidelines for recommending such requests to the Board Budget Committee
for review and to the Board of Directors for approval; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors encourages

staff to support, to the extent possible, requests for reimbursable projects by the local
jurisdictions and state governments that are beyond the annual operating, capital
improvement program and rail construction budgets and subsidies approved by the
Board of Directors; and
1. That a Reimbursable Project, excluding adjacent construction projects,

charter bus services, and projects with a full funding grant agreement
shall be classified as either Reimbursable Services/Projects or
Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts and shall be fully funded (including
all direct and indirect costs, insurance, and associated overhead costs),
and paid for by the entity requesting the project; and
Page 1 of 4
Page 216
2. That upon request by a local jurisdiction, state government, or other
entity, the General Manager shall present to the Board Budget
Committee for review and to the Board of Directors for approval, a
project description, staffing, funding and duration of each request for a
reimbursable project; except the General Manager may approve
Reimbursable Projects with participating jurisdictions and state
governments, provided that such projects do not require additional
positions and do not exceed $200,000; and the Board will be notified in
advance of such actions; and
3. That the General Manager shall ensure that staffing and funding for a
Reimbursable Project wiIJ be available so as to not require any staff or
funds from the operating, capital improvement program or rail capital
budgets or subsidies; and
4. That funding for all Reimbursable Projects shall be available in advance,

except those under a Reimbursable Fixed Price Contract which may be
paid in arrears; and
5. That pricing for all Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts with an arrears
payment schedule will include the cost of money; and
6. That either signed arrears payment contracts or funds for advance

payments must be in place before work on a project begins; and
7. That the funds for Reimbursable Projects are payable within 30 days
after the billing date, and all accounts that are not paid by the 31 st day
after billing are considered delinquent and will be assessed a late
payment penalty and interest charge, except that the Authority will be
responsible for any billing errors; and
8. That the Board of Directors will be notified of any Reimbursable Project

for which payment is 90 days past due, that the project will cease when
payment is 120 days past due, unless the Board of Directors authorizes
continuation of the project; however, in no case, without approval of the
Board of Directors, will the amount overdue for a project exceed the
amount available in the Reimbursable Project Reserve; and
9. That if a project is discontinued for non-payment or non-adherence to

project and funding agreements, the requesting party will be responsible
for close-out and termination costs; and
Page 2 of 4
Page 217
10. That the Board authorizes and directs the use of the $1.0 million new
service reserve, established by Resolution #98-14, to establish the
Reimbursable Project Reserve; and
11 . That the Reimbursable Project Reserve shall be additionally funded from

any savings realized at the completion of any Reimbursable Fixed Price
Projects and shall be used to offset potential cost overruns and start-up
costs for Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts, delinquent payments from
any Reimbursable Project, and to cover ineligible costs for reimbursable
services agreements; and
12. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the
Reimbursable Project Reserve balance is inadequate, to borrow from the
Operating Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with
interest as reimbursable program funds become available; and
13. That at the completion of a Reimbursable Services/Project, any savings

realized or shortfalls incurred shall be returned or billed, respectively, to
the participating jurisdiction; and
14. That a Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will be

established in an amount necessary to provide appropriate insurance
coverage and funding for claims up to the deductible with the reserve
level reviewed annually by an actuary; and
15. That the Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will be
funded by each project to provide protection for workers compensation,
third party claims, errors and omissions, and property damage; and
16. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the
Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve balance is
inadequate for insurance deductibles, to borrow from the Operating
Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with interest as
reimbursable program funds become available; and
17. That upon completion or termination of a Reimbursable Project, the

staffing positions associated with the project will be deleted and
removed from the Authority's position authorization; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager will provide to the Board
Budget Committee the Policyllnstruction setting forth the procedures for Reimbursable
Services/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts;
Page 3 of 4
Page 218
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager shall submit to the Board
Budget Committee a quarterly report on the status of the Reimbursable
Services/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Catania
N :\FY 2000\R ESC LUTN\reimbursable4. wpd
Page 4 of 4
Page 219
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 10, 2000
Subject: Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services
#2000-10 .
RESOLUTION
OFTHE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel directed WMATA to take the lead in
planning the regional bus network; and
WHEREAS, bus ridership has grown as a result of increased demand and the
implementation of fare integration measures, necessitating minor changes to the
regional bus services; and
WHEREAS, in May 1999 the Board of Directors adopted a set of guidelines for
adding service to existing regional Metrobus routes; and .
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors instructed staff to develop similar guidelines

for reduction of service on existing regional Metrobus routes and for adding new
regional Metrobus routes and services; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it would be beneficial to extend the

period of experimental service from one year to two years to enable flexibility to
respond to the needs of the developing market;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts the

Guidelines for Regional Bus Services dated February 3,2000, which are the May 1999
guidelines amended to include new guidelines for the reduction of service on existing
regional Metrobus lines and for adding new regional Metrobus lines and services; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board-adopted Rules And Regulations for

Metrobus Operations dated October 1996 is hereby amended to state that new
Metrobus routes and services may be operated for up to 18 months as "experimental
service" with the option to extend the period to 24 months at the Board's discretion;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be effective immediately.
Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency:
¥Q~B~Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 4 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mr. Barnett
!lUwashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR

REGIONAL METROBUS SERVICES
February 3, 2000
Page 221
~ Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services
SECTION I: GUIDELINES FOR ADDING NEW LINES AND SERVICES
The regional mobility plan as adopted, identified WMATA as the lead agency to develop
a plan for regional bus needs. As the transit needs change within the Washington D.C.
region, a guideline is needed to determine when' neWI regional service may be
implemented. Through regional service, Metrobus must meet the needs of emerging
markets that can support transit.
Identifying markets that can support transit and determining how to serve them is a task
that WMATA staff will coordinate with the staff of the jurisdictions. Once a new market is
identified, staff will use passenger demand as the performance measure for implementing
new service. Passenger demand is determined by estimating the number of passengers
that will utilize the service. Staff will recommend new service as needed as part of the
fiscal year service plan during the budget process. Service will be developed in concert
with local jurisdictions and presented to the board committees. The recommendation will
include cost, subsidy, and performance goals for 6 months, 12 months, and,
18 months.
SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCING New LINES AND SERVICES
• Determine demand for new service

• Semi-annual performance goals will be established
• Evaluate new service recommendation to identify potential success
• New service will be reviewed every six months to track ridership
One Guideline
• Minimum load factor
Service will be recommended as an experimental line if it has the potential demand

to achieve the minimum load factor for its line classification within an 18 month
period.
February 3, 2000 Page 1

Page 222
The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass
the maximum Joad point, the number of trips made during the period and the l
number of seats available on a bus. This load factor differential by line type is as
follows:
Line Classifications Minimum Load Factor
• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors .65

and is oriented toward major urban centers.
• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .55
generally does not serve urban centers.
• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .50
includes significant non-stop segments oriented
toward major centers.
• Off-peak (all service types) .50
ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES
As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using
the proposed guidelines.
• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.
• Performance goals will be set and service will be reviewed every six months

Page 223
SECTION II: GUIDEUNES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES
INTRODUCTION
When a bus service overcrowding problem is identified, staff will review existing data or
collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate
alternatives to determine if a no cost solution is possible. The following no cost
alternatives are typically used by staff:
• integrate headways along a corridor

• adjust headways
• replace smaller buses with larger buses
• have a pull-out or pull-in trip make a revenue trip
• redistribute running time
• adjust recovery time
• short turn trips
• reroute to avoid congestion
Only after it is determined that a no cost alternative does not exist will additional service
be recommended.
SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO ExiSTING LINES
• effectively measure service performance

• evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of gUidelines for
entire regional bus network.
• on a semi-annual basis service changes will be reviewed to track the impact of the
changes on the budget and ridership.
Four Guidelines
1. load factor (radial, crosstown and express)

2. running time
3. non-peak productivity standard
4. regional equity optional at the Board's discretion

Page 224
~ Service Guidelines for Regional MetrobusServices
1. Load Factor
A service increase is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum

load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour exceeds the load factor. The
load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the
maximum load point. the number of trips made during the period. and the number
of seats available on a bus (45). For example: 225 passengers divided by 5 trips,
divided by 45 seats, yields a load factor of 1.0. This load factor differential by line
type is as follows:
Line Classification Load Factors
• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors 1.2

• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1
• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0
• Off-peak (all service types) 1.0
2. Running Time Adjustments
Service will be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33% of the trips
on a linee within a 30 minute period during the peak and 60 minute period during
the off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time.
3. Non-peak Productivity
Service will be increased if ridership averages more than 30 passengers per

revenue hour during non-peak hours (at the increased service level).
4. Regional Equity at The Board's Discretion
New service, line extensions or other service enhancements to new areas will be
considered as an option to ensure regional equity as determined by relative subsidy
contributions. It is at the boards discretion to consider this option.

Page 225
IlU Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services
ApPUCATION OF GUIDEUNES
the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends service improvements, they will first
identify any no cost alternatives. If staff cannot identify any no cost alternatives then the
guidelines will be applied.
. I
• The specific changes will be proposed.
• The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.
• The final servi.ce change recommendations will be brought to the Board Operations
and Budget Committees only if there is a budget implication.
February 3, 2000 PageS

Page 226
SECTION III: GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES
INTRODUCTION
When a bus service is identified as a candidate for redu~tiont staff will review existing data
or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate
alternatives to determine if a solution is possible. The following alternatives to reducing
service are typically used by staff:
• Integrate headways along a corridor

• Adjust headways
• Adjust trips
• . Replace larger buses with smaller buses
• Short turn trips
• Public information
Only after it is determined that an alternative to reducing service does not exist will a
reduction of service be recommended.
SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES
• Effectively measure service performance

• Evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for
entire regional bus network.
• Service changes will be reviewed on a semi-annual basis to track the impact of the
changes on the budget and ridership.
Two guidelines
1. Load factor (radial, crosstown, express and off-peak)

2. Non-peak productivity standard
1. Load Factor
A service decrease is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum

load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour does not meet the minimum
load factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers
that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and
the number of seats available on a bus. The goal is to maintain a minimum load
factor for each line classification. This may require service to be reduced to
achieve the minimum goal. The minimum load factor differential by line type is as
follows:

Page 227
~ Service Guidelines for Relilional Metrobus Services
Line Classification Load Factors
• Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors .60

• Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .55
• Express - operates over major travel corridors and . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .50
2. Non-peak Productivity
Service may be decreased if ridership averages less than 18 passengers per

revenue hour during non-peak hours and staff determines that a decrease in
service is warranted based on current performance trends. A reduction of service
hours may result in improved performance.
ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES
the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends a service reduction they will first
identify any alternatives to reducing service. If staff cannot identify any alternatives, then
the guidelines will be applied.
• The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.
• The final service change recommendations wiff be brought to the board operations
and budget committees only if there is a budget implication.

Page 228
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 25,2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001-2006
#2000-34
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments from
the local jurisdictions on the Proposed Infrastructure Renewal Program for
implementation in Fiscal 2001, for planning purposes in Fiscal 2002 - 2006, and for
information purposes in Fiscal 2007 - 2010; and
WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program provides for the rehabilitation

and replacement of existing assets based on funding constraints; and
WHEREAS, the local jurisdictions have approved an Interjurisdictional Funding

Agreement through Fiscal 2003 which includes a commitment of federal and/or local
resources to meet the requirements necessary to maintain system reliability; and
WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program assumes for planning purposes

only, a $25 million increase in additional federal or non-federal funding in Fiscal 2004
and Fiscal 2005 to meet the projected requirements of the bus and rail system; and
WHEREAS, in order to meet the funding requirements in Fiscal 2001 and

beyond, the proposed program includes the use of a loan guarantee up to $600
million under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998
(TIFIA); and
WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the Authority for the General Manager,
1
or the Chief of Staff, to have standing authorization to apply for funds from the
Federal government and any other public or private entity, and to file or provide
necessary documents in order to implement the Infrastructure Renewal Program; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the

Fiscal 2001 Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $677,267,000, including
$8,054,000 in flexible funds, as identified on Attachment A; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that the Board Budget Committee will re-examine

the General Manager's proposed ramp-up plan beginning in 2006, the out-year
funding needs of the Infrastructure Renewal Program in Fiscal 2006 and beyond, the
projected ridership increases, the required vehicles and the facilities needed to
accommodate this growth from Fiscal 2001-2025, and report its findings to the Board
by November 2000; and
1 Page 229
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, with the understanding that the Budget
Committee will re-examine the out-year funding needs, the Fiscal 2002 - 2006
Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $817,591,000, as identified on Attachment
A, is hereby approved for planning purposes and the Fiscal 2007 - 201 0 Infrastructure
Renewal Program, totaling $860,023,000, is inc!uded for information purposes; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to implement the Fiscal 2001

Infrastructure Renewal Program, which involves the obligation of $667 million partially
supported by the TIFIA loan guarantee, the General Manager is authorized to issue
revenue anticipation notes, revenue bonds, certificates of participation, and other
financial borrowing instruments, subject to Board approval of the final papers for each
such financial transaction; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Infrastructure Renewal Program is the same

program as the Capital Improvement Program referenced in the TIFIA Loan Guarantee
Agreement and related documentation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.
Reviewed as form and legal sufficiency.
Cheryl C. Burke
General Counsel
Motion by Mr. Zimmerman. seconded by Mr. Davey, and unanimously·approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack! Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham! Mrs. Hanley, Mr. Davey, and Mr. Sickles
Page 230 2
p toaram b eyan dF Y06 Is for Inf ormation only
FY07 FYOB FY09 FY 10 TOTAL .TOTAL
FY07·10 FY01-10
p rogram b eyon d FY 061 s f or In f ormat on on IY
FY07 FYOB FY09 F.Y 10 TOTAL TOTAL
FY07-10 FV ot-10
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 2,700 2.900 3.200 3.600 4,000 4,000 20.400

CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP) 11 0 8,000 9.000 8.000 8,000 8.000 41,000
TOTAL 2,700 10.900 12.200 11,600 12,000 12,000 61,400
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 21.115 20.700 20.700 20.700 20,700 20.100 124,615
TOTAL 21,115 20,700 20.700 20,700 20,700 20,700 124,815
FINANCING COSTS
TOTAL 1,500 6.700 11.400 13.800 13,600 5.200 52,200
GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS 677,267 206.532 155.572 166.404 151.564 137.519 1,494.858 198,675 203.416 216.782 241.150 860.023 2,354.881
PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING 21 195.955 191.100 215.100 240.100 265,100 265.100 1,372.455 265.100 265.100 265.100 265.tOO 1.0&0.400
FINANCING (PAYBACK) 481.312 15.432 (59.528) (73.696) 1113.538) (127.5811 122.403 (66425. (61.684» (48,3181 (23,9501 (200,371) (77.974) 31
N~\FY2001\CJP\TABLE I· tOVEARa1265.W83
Noles:
1/IAWP estimato for Fiscal 2001 of $16. t million has boen allocaled and included in the abovo proJocls.
21 FY 2001 includes addillonal funds of $24.9 million from reprogrammod funds.
31 This amounl will be applied as payback for FtscaJ 2000.
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN ARE ~NSIT AUTHORITY
TABLE NO.2
FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2001 ..2006 IRP
FY 01 FY02 FYOJ FY04 FY05 FY06 TOTALS

(FED 00) (FED 01) (FED 02) (FED OJ) (FED 04) (FED 05)
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET WITHOUT FINANCING ~,955 191,100 215,100 240,100 265,100 265,100 1,372,455
TO BE FUNDED BY:
REPROGRAMMED FUNDING 24,944 24.944
SECTION 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS 78,782 78,924 84.803 90,738 90,738 90,738 514,723
20% LOCAL MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS 19,696 19,730 21,200 22,684 22,684 22,684 128,678
SECTiON 5309 RAil MODERNIZATION GRANTS 44,654 53.558 61,599 70,628 70,628 70,628 371,695
20% MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS 11,164 13,390 15.400 17,657 17,657 17,657 92,925
J1
BUS/RAil REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 1.500 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0 6,000
LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS 5.000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
ADDITIONAL LOCAL FUNDING 2,161 10,944 17,544 23,839 50.339 90,239 195,066
FEDERAL TEA-21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT) 8.054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8,054 8.054 48.324
TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING 195.955 191,100 215,100 240,100 285,100 265,100 1,372.455
FINANCING/(PAYBACK) 481.312 15.432 (59.528) (73,898) (113.536) (127,581) 122,403
TOTAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING 677.267 206.532 155,572 166.404 151.564 137,519 1,494.858
""U
Q)
~y2001~Ip\l1lble2.t285y,bJ
CD
f\J
W
W
TABLE 3
"1J
Q)
CO FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET
CD Un I"ousand! of doCla,s.
N
W
~ FUNDINQ SOURCES
100,., LOCAL ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT

ALLOCATION FlEXIDLE REPAIRABLE NON·FEOERAl INCOMEI DEBT REPROGRAMMED
PROJECTS: CATEGORY SECTION 9 SECTION J FUNDS PAnTS FUNDING SUBTOTAL OTHER FINANCING FUNDING 11) TOTAL
RAfl CAR PROCUREMENT nAil CAT. 1 $0 $24,896 $24,898

RAil CAR REHAOIUTATION RAil CAT. 2 1,902 $1,902 $408.207 $410.109
EMERGENCY RAil REHA81UT ATION RAil CAT. 2 $10.556 $10.556 $10.556
STATION STRUCTURES &
EaUfPMENT REHABILITATION RAil CAT. 2 $19.042 $43.877 $62.919 $62.919
RAil MAINTENANCE RAIL CAT. 2 $2.700 $2,100 $253 $2,953
OTHER nAil PROJECTS RAil CAT. 2 $5.644 '10,038 $5.000 $2.162 $22,944 $14,682 $7.046 $44,571
BUS PURCHASES BUS MILES $1,190 $8,054 $9,244 $23,206 82.674 $35.123
ANNUAL BUS oveRHAUL DUSMILES $18,415 "8.416 $18.415
SOUTtIEAST DUS GARAGE BUS MtlES $4,473 $4.473 '4,473
OTHER BUS PROJECTS BUS MilES $25,085 $25.085 $25,095
JOINT BUS & RAIL BUS MilES S1'.373 $11,373 $1.500 $10,069 $15.225 $38.167
(}\ TOTAL $98.478 $55,817 $8,054 '6,000 $2.162 $169.511 $1.500 $481.312 $24.944 $677,261
LOCAL MATCH:
FLEXIBLE FUNDING· BUS $1.611 1.611
OTHER BUS ITEMS $12.107 $0 $0 12,107
aus REPAIRABLE PARTS 0
RAIL CATEGOAY I $0 $0 $0 $0 0
RAIL CATEGORY II $7,588 $11,163 $0 $2.162 20,914
RAil REPAIRABLE PARTS $5,000 5.000
0
TOTAL lOCAL $19.696 $11,163 $1.611 $6.000 $2,162 $39,632
TABLE 4
FISCAL 2001 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM BUDGET
STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
PRINCE
DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
FLEXIBLE FUNDING MATCH:

BUS PROJECTS
FEDERAL $2,356,455 $1,018,322 $1,402,364 $335,150 $450,552 $0 $859,109 $21,248 $6.443,200
LOCAL $589.114 $254,580 $350,591 $83,788 $112..638 $0 $214.771 $5.312 $1.610..800
TOTAl FLEXIBLE FUNDING $2.945.569 $1,212.902 $1.752.954 $418,938 $563,190 $0 $1,073,886 $26,560 $8.054,000
SECTION 9 MATCH:
BUS PROJECTS $4.427,936 $1.913,494 $2,635,134 $629,169 $846,617 $0 $1.614,323 $39,926 $12.107,200
RAIL CA TEGOnV 2 $2,784,184 $1.388,374 $1, 178,023 $341,397 $794.. 505 $22.917 $1,050,690 $22,310 $7.588,400
TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH $7,212.120 $3,301,868 $3,813,157 $977.166 $1,641,123 $22.917 $2,665.013 $62.236 $19,695.600
SECTION 3 MATCH:
'-J BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
RAIL CA TEGOAY 2 $4.095,851 $2,042,456 $1,733.006 $511,060 $1.168,808 $33.713 $1,545,684 $32,820 $11,163,400
TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH $4.095.851 $2,042,456 $1,733.006 $511.060 $1,168,808 $33..713 $1,545,684 $32,820 $11,163..400
ADDITIONAL NON·FEDERAL:
BUS PROJECTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
RAIL CA TEGOnV 2 $793.238 $395.560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6.529 $299.351 $6,356 $2,162,000
TOTAL AOO'L. NON·FEDERAl $793.238 $395,560 $335,629 $98,976 $226,361 $6,529 $299,351 $6,356 $2,162,000
REPAIRABLE PARTS:
BUS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
RAIL $1.834,500 $914.800 $776.200 $228,900 $623,500 $15,100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000.000
TOTAL REPAIRABLE PARTS $1.834,500 $914,800 $776,200 $228,900 $523,500 $15.100 $692,300 $14,700 $5,000,000
TOTAL LOCAL W/O FLEX. $13,935,709 $6.654.683 $6.657.992 $1,816,103 $3.559,792 $78,260 $5,202,348 $116,113 $38,021,000
TOTAL lOCAL PLUS FLEX. $16.881.278 $7.927.586 $8,410,947 $2.235,041 $4,122,982 $78;260 $6,276,234 $142;673 $46..075,000
BUS CAPITAL ONE-TENTH

ADJUSTMENT ($67,8881 $ 1.991 $81,617 .•..•..••-------•..•.•••••.-- NVTC c $15,720 •••••.••••••.•..•••.•--------.••• $0
"'U
Q)
CO
CD
N
tv
01
N.V=Y200I\CIIJ'2DO.CIPr.\VU2 05118100 7;53:27 AM

SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF METRORAIL OPERATING HOURS
#2000-39
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority is committed to

enhancing service for its riders in a cost-effective manner; and
WHEREAS, it would be beneficial for our riders and the regional economy for
WMATA to extend the hours of Metrorail operations; and
WHEREAS, safety and service reliability remain the top priorities for Metrorail
operations; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted a Transit Service Expansion,Plan on

March 25, 1999, that calls for WMATA to "improve access to and capacity of the Metro
System", and the extension of hours of Metro operations, which is supported by segments
of the community and may have economic development benefits, is consistent with the
goals of the Board's service expansion policy; and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 1999, Metrorail extended its hours of revenue

operations and the hours of associated Metrobus service from midnight to 1:00 AM on
Friday and Saturday nights for an eight-month demonstration period through June 30,
2000;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the demonstration to extend

operations hours to 1:00 AM on Friday and Saturday is hereby made a permanent addition
to Metrorail and associated Metrobus operating hours;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Metrorail shall extend its hours of revenue

operations and the hours of associated Metrobus service from 1:00 AM to 2: 00 AM on
Friday and Saturday nights for a demonstration period beginning July 1,2000 through
June 30. 2001;
Page 236
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF METRORAIL OPERATING HOURS
Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthatthe General Managershall issue a memorandum

to the Board of Directors that WMATA has the resources, including staffing and equipment,
to implement the extension to 2:00 a.m. and that there are no operational, reliability,
maintenance, or safety impediments to implementation;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager shall provide to the Board
Budget Committee by April, 2001 a report on the extension of Metrorail hours of operation
from 1:00 AM to 2:00 AM covering the time period through March, 2001, and the Board at
that time shall consider that analysis, which minimally will include the following:
• Actual revenues compared to projections,

• Actual expenses compared to projections,
• Actual ridership compared to projections,
• An assessment of crime to persons and property,
• An assessment of impact on maintenance, and
• An assessment of the impact on service reliability;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, absent subsequent Board action or specific

budget authorization, this extension of the hours of Metrorail operation will terminate on
June 30,2001;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager shall clearly identify in the
proposed Fiscal Year 2002 budget the expected revenue, expenses and jurisdictional
subsidies required for the extension of operating hours proposal until 2:00 AM so that the
Board may examine and considerthis item in conjunction. with other service enhancements
during its budget deliberations;
BE lT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective

immediately.
~\EXPANPLN/I:tESOI.UTION·200AMwPCl
Motion by Mr. Graham. seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mrs. Hanley
Page 237
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL

2001 OPERATING BUDGET
. #2000-40
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFTHE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the comments of the local jurisdictions
on the Proposed Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the comments received support adoption of the Fiscal 2001 Operating
BUdget as distributed to the local jurisdictions.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal
2001 Operating Budget providing for revenues of $389,638,372 , operating expenses of
$728,484,595 , and a gross subsidy requirement of $338,846,223 and 9,419 positions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 2001 debt service requirement is

$27,484,194
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 1999 audit adjustment is $20,515,500
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the jurisdictional shares of the Fiscal 2001 gross
subsidy and debt service requirement are as follows:
District of Columbia $144,619,983

Montgomery County $64,604,817
Prince George's County $63,256,297
City of Alexandria $16,531,129
Arlington County $27,399,589
Fairfax City $677,989
Fairfax County $48 ,179,867
City of Falls Church...................... $1,060,746
Total $366,330,417
Cheryl C(~urke
General eounsel
Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 • Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett, and Mrs. Hanley
Page 238
41, , ~
"
Q)
CO
CD
N
W
to
Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget
""U $ in T/JoUSBnds
Q)
co
en
tv
~ District of Montgo.nery Pro George's City of Arlington Fairfax Fairfax Falls
0 Total Columbia County County Alexandria County City County Church
Base BUdget $336,251.0 $133,235.5 $59,399.8 $57.725.4 $14,759.6 $25,036.0 $641.6 $44,423.5 $1,029.6
Paratransit Services for Fairfax &

Prince George's Counties $418.2 ($6.7) ($10.9) $42.2 ($4.2) ($1.5) ($1.3) $400.9 ($0.3)
Revenue Adjustment ($11.100.0) ($4,303.6) ($1,898.3) ($1,758.0) ($511 ..4) ($1,061.1) ($27.8) ($1,504.4) ($35.3)
Continuation of Metrorail 1:00 am Close $2,100.0 $796.0 $367.0 $364.0 $93.0 $189.0 $5.0 $280.0 $6.0
Extension of Late Closing to 2:00 am $1.500.0 $576.0 $260.0 $260.0 $67.0 $131.0 $3.0 $198.0 $5.0
New Regional Bus Service $2,787.0 $1,031.0 $445.0 $445.0 $558.0 $133.0 $3.0 $168.0 $4.0
Jan 13 Opening of Branch Ave Line $1,359.0 $364.0 $133.0 $652.0 $30.0 $53.0 $3.0 $121.0 $3.0
Branch Avenue Bus Service Plan $393.0 $568.0 ($99.0) $80.0 ($25.0) ($57.0) $0.0 ($74.0) $0.0
SmartMover $1,522.0 $43.0 $786.0 $19.0 $0.0 ($3.0) $2.0 $675.0 $0.0
Enhanced Marketing $500.0 $205.0 $77.0 $85.0 $23.0 $40.0 $1.0 $67.0 $2.0
Washington Navy Yard Shuttle $163.0 $127.0 ($14.0) $0.0 $18.0 $38.0 $0.0 ($6.0) $0.0
Union station to Dulles $750.0 $750.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Branch Avenue to King Street $473.0 $150.0 $46.0 $190.0 $17.0 $26.0 $0.0 $43.0 $1.0
Accelerated Recruitment and Training $500.0 $203.0 $80.0 $79.0 $24.0 $45.0 $1.0 $66.0 $2.0
Diesel Fuel $950.0 $413.8 $130.4 $171.7 $45.1 $80.2 $0.7 $124.9 $3.2
Workers' Compensation ($260.0) ($101.9) ($40.2) ($55.8) ($9.5) ($13.0) ($0.4) ($38.8) ($0.4)
Additional Strategic Buses $540.0 $238.6 $75.5 $84.0 $28.4 $43.9 $0.5 $66.8 $2.3
Debt Service $27,484.2 $10,331.3 $4,867.5 $4.872.9 $1,418.2 $2,740.2 $46.7 $3,188.9 $38.5
VA Total = $93,849.3
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: June 8, 2000
SUBJECT: POLICY FOR TRAVEL TO APTA, COMTO & UITP FUNCTIONS
#2000-41
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution #98-28 on June 25, 1998,
establishing policy on staff participation in activities sponsored by the American Public
Transportation Association (APTA)1 the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials
(COMTO), and the International Union of Public Transport (UITP); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors recognizes the benefit to the Authority from
Board and staff participation in activities sponsored by APTA, COMTO, and UITP; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that WMATA benefits from staff
participation in APTA activities by keeping abreast of the best practices in the transit
industry; by receiving professional training and development; by participating in the
exchange of ideas, experiences and regulatory/legislative/product improvement updates;
and by being represented in functional areas where many transit industry decisions are
being made; and
WHEREAS. the Board of Directors recognizes the importance of being cost

conscious in funding travel expenses for staff participation in conferences;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors authorizes the

General Manager to designate staff participation at APTA and COMTO conferences,
seminars and workshops;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager may attend any APTA,
U1TP or COMTO events as necessary;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is directed to provide

quarterly reports to the Board on staff participation at these functions, to include who
traveled, where the function was held, and the purpose of the participation;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one member of the Board of Directors may

represent the Authority at UITP functions;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that attendance by the Board of Directors and senior

staff at the APTA Legislative Conference shall be in accordance with the flat fee
negotiated between the Authority and APTA;
Page 241
SUBJECT: Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary shall coordinate Board member

attendance at APTA and COMTO functions;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that at its discretion and subject to availability of

funding, the Board of Directors may approve attendance by any member of the Board or
staff at any function not specifically authorized above;
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effectively immediately

and shall supercede Resolution #98-28.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett. and Mrs. Hanley
Page 242
. PRESENTED & ADOPTED: June B 2000
1
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE·

PROCUREMENT POLICY STATEMENT
#2000-42
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFTHE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors approved specific procurement thresholds

on July 24, 1997, and approved the Procurement Policy Statement by Resolution No.
97-31; and
WHEREAS, the dynamic nature of Authority procurements require changing the

thresholds for designated procurement actions and to elaborate on the emergency
authority delegated to the General Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following changes to the

Procurement Policy Statement are hereby approved:
• the Board contract approval thresholds for Professional and Technical

(P&T) actions is consistent regardless of fund source;
• the Board approval threshold for modification of equipment, supplies,

services, construction and real estate contracts not funded from P&T
funds is changed from $200,000 to: A) for Board approved contracts,
10 % of the original approved contract value or $200,000, whichever is
lower; and B) for non-Board approved contracts when the cumulative
value of the original contract and all modifications will exceed $100,000;
and
• the Board guidelines for reporting emergency procurements is changed

from periodically to within 60 days of the action.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that this Resolution shalf be effective

immediately.
Reviewed as form and legal sufficiency.
Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmennan, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mrs. Hanley
Page 243
· "
XV. Contract ~.!\pproval Requirements -The Board has delegated approval authority to the
General Manager for cenain activities identified below. The General Manager is authorized
to delegate the approval of procurement initiation and award activities that the B~ard has
delegated to the General Manager to subordinate officials of the A.uthority. The General
Manager will establish procedures which will provide for timely revie\v and processing of
all procurement actions. Board approval is required for the follo\ving:
ACTIVITY REQUIRING BOARD APPROV.A.L DOLLAR THRESHOLD

E. Initiation of Procurement:
1. All procurement actions except as li~ed Over 5100,000

below.
2. Real Estate Acquisitions Board Approval Not

Required
3. Professional and Technical Services (P&T)
a. Operating Over S50,OOO If

Budgeted
Over 510,000 If Non-
Budgeted
b. Capital Over 550,000 If

Budgeted
Over S10.000 If Non-
Budgeted
F. Contract Awards:
1. All awards, except as listed below. Over S100.000
., Real Estate Acquisitions Over S150~OOO
3. .-:\ny award which would represent a

change to Board policy.
4. Professional and Technical SeiVices (P&T)
a. Operating o ve r S 5 0 . 0 a 0 Ii
Budgeted
Over 510,000 If Non-
Budgeted
b. Capital Over 550,000 If

Budgeted
Over S10,000 If Non-
Budgeted
Revised 5/01/00.
Page 244
· ".
G. Modifications:
1. All modifications for equipment, supplies, A. For Board Annr'oved

services, construction and real estate Contracts:
including exercise of options, ex.cept as 10% of the original
noted below. approved contract
value or 5-200,000!
whichever is lower.
B. For Non-Board
Anoroved Contracts:
The cumulative
value oithe original
contract and all
modifications exceeds
SIOOtOOO
1. Any modification exceeding the authorized Over Budget

budget including contingency, if any.
3. Any budgeted modification to exercise a Board Appro\'al

contract option when the option was evaluated Not Required.
as part of the basis of award and Board approval
was provided as part of the initial award.
4. Piofessional and Technical Sen;ces (P&T)
a. Operating Over S I 0.000: Board

approval required if
modification is greater
than S10.000 more than
funds prevlously
approved on Staff
Summary Sheet.
b. Capital Over S 10,000; Board

approval required if
modification is greater
than 510,000 more than
funds previously
approved on Staff
Summary Sheet.
NOTE 1: Notwithstanding the above, the Generaliv!anager has the authority to incur
obligations in emergency situations, and \vill report back to the Board on all
emergency procurements within 60 days ofthe action. Emergency is defined
as a situation (such as a flood, epidemic) riot, equipment failure, or other
reason declared by the General Manager) \vhich creates an immediate threat
10 the public health, welfare or safety. The existence of an emergency
condition creates an innnediate need for supplies, services or construction
\vhich cannot be met throu~h Donnal procurement methods, and the lack of
which "would seriously threaten either the health or safety of any person, the
Revised 5/QlIOO _
Page 245
·..
preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary
'.
Authority functions.
NOTE 2: Professional and Technical (P&T) services includes but is not limited to labor
and services provided by attorneys, accountants, appraisers, arbiters, auditors,
investment bankers, computer service companies, architect/engineering firms,
management consultants, and transit industry consultants. . .
Revised 5101/00
Page 246
B(lARD ''It()ClJl~EI\'II(NT ACTION I"IATI~IX
Revised 5/01/00
ACTIVITY IU~QUIIUNG BOAIUl D()LLAR TIIIU~SIl()I.I) - CURRI~NT DOLLAR TIIRI~S"'OLD

- 1)I~OI)OSI~D IIY
AI'PROVAL TIIEGMGR
A. Initiation of Procurement
I. AII procurement actions except as Over $100)000 No Change

Iisted below.
2. Real Estate Acquisitions Board Approval not Required No Change
3. Professional and Technical

Services (P&T)
a. Operating Over $50,000 if Budgeted No Change

Over $10,000 if Non-13udgcted
b. Capital Over $100,000 Over $50)000 if Buugetcd

Over $10)000 if Non-Budgeted
"lJ
Q)
(0
(1)
I\.)
~
-..J
·gACTIVITY 1~I~QlJlIUNG BOARD J)OLLAI~ TIII~ESIIOLJ) - CUI~IU~NT DOLLAI~ T"'I~ESHOLD - JlI~OI)OSED BY
~fJl)ROVAIJ THE GI\'IGI{
~. Contract Awards:
I. All awards except as listed below Over $100,000 No Change
2. Real Estate Acquisitions Over $250,000 No Change
3. Any award which would Requires Board Approval No change

represent a change to Board
policy e.g. Indemnification
4. Professional and Technical

Services (P&T)
a. Operating r
Over $50,000 i Budgeted No Change
Over $10,000 i r Non-Budgeted
Over $50,000 if Budgeted

b. Capital Over $100,000 Over $1 o,ono if Non-budgeted
ACTIVITV H.lc:QlJlIUNG nOAIU) I)()LLAR TllnESII()I.ll - CLJIUU~NT D()LI-AI{ TIIRI~SIlOLD- PROI)OSI~J) BY
AI)I)({()VAI. TilE GMGR
C. Modifications
I. All modi fications for equipmcllt Over $200,000 A. For Board Approved Contracts:
supplies, services, construction Hnd 10%. of thc original approvcd contract
rClIl estate including exercise of vulue or $200,000, whichever is lower.
options, except us noted below B. For Non-Board Approved Contracts:
The cumulative value of the original contract
and nil modifielltions excceds $100,000.
2. Any modification exceeding the Ovcr Budget No Change

authorized budget including
contingency, if any.
3. Any budgeted modi fication tn Board Approval not Required No ('hange

exercise a contract option whcn the
option was evaluated as part of the
hasis of aWilrd and Board approval
was provided as part of thc initial
award.
4. Professional and Technical Services
a. Operating Over $10,000; Board approval required ir No Change

Modi fication is greater than $1 n,OO() more than
funds previously approved on StalT Summary Shect
b. CapitClI Over $200,000 Over $10,000; Board approval required i r

Modification is grcaler lh:m $10,"00 more than
:P
(~ funds previously approvcd on Sta IT Summary Shcet.
.U
~
CD
"U
w
$.lo(e: Thc (jencral Manager hns the ilUlhority to incur obligations in emcrgency situations, and will report back to the Board on all emergency procurements within
I'V 60 days. Emergency is defined as n situation (such as a flood. cpidcmic, riot, equipmcnt f~lilure, or other reason dechlred by the General Manager) which
CJ1
o creatcs an illll1lcdiutc threat to the public hecllth, welfare. or safety. The existence uran cmcrgency conc.Jition creates an immediate need It)r supplies. services
or construction which cannot be met through normal procurement mcthods, iIIul the lack of which would seriously threaten either the health or safety of any
persont the preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary Authority functions.
SUBJECT: REVISED IRP REPROGRAMMING POLICY
-12000-43
(
RESOLUTION
( OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, beginning in fiscal 2000, the Board of Directors has determined that a quarterly
report on the status of the Infrastructure Renewal Program will be presented to the Board Budget
Committee; and
WHEREAS the Infrastructure Renewal Program includes Internally Generated Funds as a funding
source for projects; and
WHEREAS from time to time adjustments may be required to approved Infrastructure Renewal
Program budgets and project funding levels; and
WHEREAS the Board Budget Comminee has directed the General Manager to establish a budget
amendment and reprogramming policy for the Infrastructure Renewal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEO that the following actions affecting the Infrastructure
Renewal Program budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior to submission to
the Board of Directors:
• initiation of any new project; or
• amendment of any fiscal year's total budget in the approved six-year program; or
• any increase in IRP staffing; or
• any reprogramming actions over $200,000 on an annual cumulative basis between IRP
projects in the current year's budget; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when the General Manager submits an annual proposed IRP
budget, the total amount of IRP Internally Generated Funds available shall be identified, the proposed
use of all or part of these funds in the proposed IRP shall be provided, and any use of IRP Internally
Generated Funds other than as included in an approved IRP budget shall require approval by the Board
Budget Committee prior to submission to the Board of Directors; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any reprogramming actions below the $200,000 threshold will
be identified and included in the quarterly report to the Board Budget Committee; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is authorized to approve reprogramming

actions exceeding the $200,000 limit on an emergency basis, as defined in the WMATA Procurement
Regulations, provided that the Board Budget Committee be immediately notified of such actions; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that this Resolution supercedes Resolution #99-64 adopted on

October 28, 1999 and shall be effective immediately.
~d~;-
General Counsel
Motion by Mr. Zimmerman, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved.
Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. ~~~s 251
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001103·MILE RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET
#2000-44
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Fifth Interim Capital Contributions Agreement (ICCA-V), executed on

January 29,1992, provides for the completion of the folloWing Metrorail segments:
a. Blue Line from Van Darn to Franconia-Springfield

b. Red Line from Wheaton to Glenmont
c. Green Line from U Street-Cardozo to Fort Totten
d. Green Line from Anacostia to Branch Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the WMATA Rail Capital Program Committee has reviewed the proposed
Fiscal 2001 Budget, as attached hereto, and recommends Board approval; and
WHEREAS, on January 27,2000 WMATA submitted the Proposed Rail Capital

Program Budget to the Political Subdivisions/Guarantors; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments from the
local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2001 103-Mile Rail Capital Program Budget; and
WHEREAS, completion of the 103-mile system requires a Fiscal 2001 Budget

(obligation plan) totaling $80,04Q,000 and a cumulative monthly ceiling for local jurisdictional
cash payments totaling $79,969,500 consistent with Local Funding Agreements signed by
each participating jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, a total of $383,900,000 has been identified for transfer to construction of

the Branch Avenue Yard and rail car procurement ($1 04,000,000 from the 89.5-Mile System
Budget, $29,500,000 from the insurance buy-out and $250,400,000 from the 103-Mile
System Budget); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors, in accordance

with ICCA-V, approves the Authority's proposed Fiscal 2001 Rail Capital Program Budget.
Cheryl C. u'rke
General C unsel
Motion by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Trotter, and unanimously approved.

A~§ 2~2i' Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. Sickles
I ~ ~ I I • if. •
•• ,t' \.
.1 ... .. .. ... ..... . . . ... ... ... . .... .. .. ... . ... . . _...
. / . . ' . .
103-MILE SYSTEM COMPLETION
Fiscal 2001
Segment Obligation Schedule Expenditure Schedule

.
JanuarY June January June

Mailout Current Mailout Current
J/H Route $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0

08 Route $ 0.0 $ 0.3 $ 0.2 $ 0.3
ME Route $ 5.1 $ 5.1 $ 46.0 $ 14.5
OF Route* $60.5 $67.7 $112.9 $115.8
Rail Cars S 6.9 $ 6.9 ~ 94.2 $ 96.6
"U
Q)
TOTAL $72.6 $80.0 $253.4 $227.2
co
CD
tv
01
w ($ in Millions)
*Includes Branch Avenue Yard..
103-MILE SYSTEM
BRANCH AVENUE YARD & RAIL CARS REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING
As of June 15, 2000 ($ in millions)
Rgguirements
Branch Avenue Yard $112.0
192 Rail Cars $378.1 $490.1
Current Funding
103-Mile System
> JH Route $69.1
> B Route $42.4
> F Route $138.9
89.5 Mile System $104.0
Insurance Buy-Out $29.5
Tax Advantage Leases - Closed Transactions $81.0
Rail Car Insurance Payment $1.2
.Subtotal (Completes Ya"rd & Buys 150 Rail Cars) $466.1
Remaining Funds Needed: .$24.0
Probable Source:
> CIP Funds $24.0
Total Funding: 'Completes Yard & Buys 192. Rail'Cars $490.1
, I
.: .. .
'r·:··':"·~:·:_-·~:"· ~: ~":K': . :::. "::..
~::.: .:-.:.~::.~:: .; -
~':.": ~ :.':.:'-:~.:. :'.. "> :: : ••• ' .: , ••••••• '.-' ••• , :~'." ::.:'.. • " ••• , • • • '-.::
i,V ~ 't' i~~'::i'~;.1 ;i :(1 Ii I,'~"i I; ;', i;,'!1 ;,,.,, ~~.~ Ii,., '" \ ,'l;"j" l:]'a';'" I;. -:, ;':.; ,i': ." 'o,;! '" ",. '. ' !: "" ;, ,', ! < 'i:; i; ;: " ,
: I' \.. / :->..",::.. :',,; ","';'.' j',.''-::,.. ' " , .'.. \. :-,\
'.t', :::. :- ,,'
~ '''~' ~ ,! : . ' ,:' , ::: I:'! ," :'.'" \ '~, " " .... ' ", '" '. :':- :;. ,,". ,. ,.,. ,", I .,.,.. " ' h : ..:
J
.. ... '
RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM BUDGET -103 MILE SYSTEM

CUMULATIVE MONTHLY CEILING FOR FISCAL 2001 CASH PAYMENTS
=~=·-::~~~~==--~--=:=:~~=~~=:.rD~~;;~;;;I~~~"~~~~;~~r~:::g:;s';~;;~~;·~:='·::·=--=~·~~;;;rljN-;:'~;;'.:~;~~~~~';;''wm;;'~-==~~: :-~:~
---- -------------- ...-_.. -----"-CoWM BIA - ---coUNty ---- -- COUNty-I---tOtAr-~LEXANDRIAI---couNrv,·-I-clt\r--1 cl1UNfV ICRuRcHI-rofAf -r -tOtAL "
.
FISCAL 2001 E:STIMATEOF BILLS:
------------
, - _______ ' .--L-
'"U
m
(Q
CD
I\.>
rn
(11 Revised 4:00 p.m.
June 13. 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2001 SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION
PROGRAM BUDGET
#2000-45
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments from
the local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2001 System Improvement and Expansion
Program; and
WHEREAS, public transit services in the Washington metropolitan area playa key
role in providing mobility, reducing traffic congestion, lowering emissions and improving the
quality of life and the economic vitality of the region; and
WHEREAS , the WMATA Board of Directors recognizes that transit services must
continue to be a major element of the region's transportation network and that the region's
bus and rail services must continue to expand as the region grows; and
WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors adopted a Transit Service Expansion

Plan which defines proposed projects and programs to double transit ridership by 2025;
and
WHEREAS , the System Improvement and Expansion Program is comprised of a

Project Development Program, Improvement Projects and Major Expansion Projects.
1
Development of the System Improvement and Expansion Program was initiated at the
request of the WMATA Board of Directors to implement the Transit Service Expansion
Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approve the

Fiscal 2001 System Improvement and Expansion Program Budget totaling $ 229,909,000,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.
Motion by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hanley, and Mr. Sickles
Page 256
FY 2001 - 2006 System Impru'Iement and Expansion Program
Current Project - Obligation Projections
(Dollars in Thousands) FY 2001 for Approval & FY 2002 - 2006 for Planning Purposes Only
Project Current FY 2000 & FY 2001 2001 Thru
~_~:. . 1... : _
Prior FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 2008
Project Development" 19,30C 2,000 2.30C 3.000 3.000 3,000 3,OOC 3.00e 17,30C
Largo Extension 4331B6~ 14 t 602 100,OO( 100 OO(
t 105.011 100,OO( 14,24~ 0 419,26,
Duties PE/NEPA 40 550t 550 40,OO( 0 0 0 0 0 40.00C
DC Convention Center 25,20(J 19,77A 3,20C 1,80(J 426 0 0 0 5,426
Vienna Parking Garage 25,10C 24,757 343 0 0 a a 0 343
New York Avenue Station 84.00C 3,800 IO,OOC 5,000 3.000 2.200 0 0 aO,200
Rosslyn Livable Communities 2,125 2.125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
King street SlaUon .13,10C 0 1,423 9,900 1,777 0 0 0 13,100
Ballston Station Improvements·· 8,700 0 a.70C 0 0 0 0 0 8.700
Clarendon Station Improvements·· 960 0 960 0 0 0 0 a 960
Rosslyn Station Improvements·· 120 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 120
Shirlington Bus Terminal·· 1.100 0 1.100 0 0 0 0 0 1,100
Pentagon Bus Terminal"· 200 0 200 a 0 0 0 0 200
Silver Spring Transit Center 8,972 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ITS Communications Enhancement 1.563 0 1,56~ 0 0 0 0 0 1,563

TOTALS 664 85~ 67.82A 229 90~ 11970( 113~2201 10520( 17246 3 000 588.27~
"Proposed FY 2001 Budget ··Needs further definition of scope and funding by jurisdictional slaff
Note: Largo $ amounts represent the Maryland approved Budget including Maryland's estfmated Federal match
Allocation of FY '01 Protect Development Funds ($ In Millions)
District of Columbia 37% $0.85
Maryland 35% $0.81
Virginia 280/0 $0.64
$2.30
FUNDED PROJECTS
to $2.3 million Project Development Program candidate projects to be reviewed and approved per adopted
policy:
District of Columbia
Transit Service
Expansion
Project FY 2001 Budget Plan Element*
to
to
Georgetown Connection with optional routes
Downtown to Fort Lincoln via New York Avenue with
connection to future New York Avenue Station
-
'** 4
4
to Georgia Avenue from Silver Spring to Howard *'* 4

University with alternative routes south
.. Woodley Park to Minnesota Avenue, SE via Adams Morgan, ** 4
U Street, Florida Avenue and Benning Road
.. Georgetown or Foggy Bottom to Southwest Waterfront '*'* 4
via Kennedy Center and the Tidal Basin
.. Southeast/Southwest Business Route to connect *. 4
M Street SW to Buzzard Point and back to M Street SE
.. Congress Heights or Anacostia to National Harbor, ** 2
Prince George's County
.. Cleveland Park or Woodley Park to Brookland via Medstar 4
Washington Hospital Center and the McMillan Sand Filtration Site
'** Project specific budget to be determined

Total: $850,000·*
State of Maryland
. Georgetown Branch Transitway $300,000 4

.. Beltway Transit Study $200,000 4
.. Woodrow Wilson Bridge $170,000 4
.. New Carrollton Parking Garage $ 90,000 1
1-270 Corridor Study $ 50.000 4
Total: $810,000
Commonwealth of Virginia
.. Rosslyn (2 nd entrance) $ 40,000 3

Crystal City (2 nd entrance) $ 60,000 3
Columbia Pike - LRT $ 60,000 4
.. Parking Franconia/Springfield (Conceptual) $140,000 1
.. West Falls Church/Dunn Loring (2 nd Parking Lot) (Conceptual) $ 90.000 1
East Falls Church (2 nd Parking Lot) (Conceptual) $ 90,000 1
Woodrow Wilson Bridge $100,000 4
VA Beltway/Highway NEPA Process Review $ 40,000 4
.. VDOT Route 1 Center Line StUdy $ 20.000 2
Total: $640,000
Notes: * Element 1: Improve access to and capacity of Metrorail.

Element 2: Improve bus service levels and expand to new service areas.
Element 3: Selectively add stations, entrances and station capacity to the existing system.
Element 4: Expand fixed guideway services.
··District of Columbia has an additional S740K in unallocated carryover from FY 2000.
Recommend that all unobligated FY 2000 Project Development funds carryover to FY 2001.
T\ROO\F'19aOgR~E25"S
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JULY 27, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO CARRYOVER FISCAL

2000 IRP FUNDS INTO FISCAL 2001
{
#2000-47
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed the Fiscal 2000
Preliminary Fourth Quarter Infrastructure Renewal Program Status Report and has
determined that funds for certain criticaJ projects which have not been encumbered in
Fiscal 2000 should be carried over into Fiscal 2001 for implementation; and
WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program provides for the rehabilitation

and replacement of existing assets, and the completion of these projects is necessary
to maintain system reliability.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the

carryover of' funding in the amount of approximately $7.1 million for the following five
projects from Fiscal 2000 to Fiscal 2001 for encumbrance and implementation:
o ERRP projects estimated at $ 3.6 million,

o IAWP projects estimated at $2.5 million,
o Silver Spring Call Center project estimated at $0.3 million, and
o Station Signage project estimated at $0.7 million; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the funding for these projects shall be

encumbered by December 31, 2000 unless otherwise directed by the Board of
Directors; and
o
ad as to form and legal sufficiency.

Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Kauffman
Page 259
The reNEWed WMATA
We will aggressively transform WMATA
into
an entrepreneurial, customer and business focused, empowered team
Page 260

FY2001 Approved Budget (263 Pages)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FY2001 Approved Budget (263 Pages)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

APPROVED FISCAL 2001

Infrastructure Renewal Program........................................ 103

Rail Construction Program 139

Reimbursable Projects 155

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction 165

Resolutions of the Board of Directors 197

j This Page Not Used

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

System Operating Budget $755.9 million

Infrastructure Renewal Program $677.3 million

Rail Construction Budget $ 84.8 million

System Improvement and Expansion Budget $229.9 million

Reimbursable Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $11.7 million

Reinvestment in existing MetroraH and Metrobus assets remains a critical priority to

Where it Comes From

Federal I Other $1,031.2

Gross Subsidy $338.8

REVENUE AND FEDERAL I LOCAL FUNDING

FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-

Line of Credit Financing $0.0 $47.6 $481.3

Repairable Parts Reserve:

Bond Refinancing, IGF and

89.5 Mile System $16.2 $10.0 $4.8

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS $11.7

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION $8.0 $57.2 $229.9

TOTAL REVENUE & FUNDING $976.7 $1,141.5 $1,759.6

Infrastructure Renewal Program

Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%

System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%

TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%

Infrastructure Renewal Program 677.3 38%

Rail Construction 84.8 5%

Reimbursable Projects 11.7 1%

System Improvements & Expansion 229.9 13%

TOTAL ANNUAL BUDGET $1,759.6 100%

MULTI YEAR BUDGET SUMMARY

FISCAL 1999 FISCAL 2000 FISCAL 2001

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM-

89.5 Mile System 16.2 10.0 4.8

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS 11.7

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION 8.0 57.2 229.9

TOTAL BUDGET $976.7 $1.141.5 $1,759.6

FISCAL 2001 BUDGET

Summary -- Organization and Staffing

This Page Not Used

Summary -- Organization and Staffing

James Gallagher (A)

James Stewart Fred Goodine

Summary -- Organization and Staffing

FY2000 FY2001 Net

Asst. General Manager - COMP 3 4 1

Deputy General Manager - Operations 5 6 1

Chief Operating Officer - Rail 3 3 0

Chief Operating Officer - Bus 6 6 0

Department of Operations 7,244 7,737 493

Continued Next Page."""

Summary -- Organization and Staffing

FY2000 FY 2001 Net

Asst. General Manager - TSDV 4 5 1

Asst. General Manager - ADMN 27 32 5

Authority Total 8,946 9,419 473

Summary -- Organization and Staffing

Continued next page...