Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zehra (Bozkurt) ZDEMIR1 ;Ismail GK2 ;Yusuf YAYLI3 and Faik Nejat EKMEKCI4
1
ekmekci@science.ankara.edu.tr,
Abstract
A magnetic eld is dened by the property that its divergence is zero in three dimensional
semi-Riemannian manifolds. Each magnetic eld generates a magnetic ow whose trajectories are
curves
called as magnetic curves. In this paper, we investigate the eect of magnetic elds on
the moving particle trajectories by variational approach to the magnetic ow associated with the
Killing magnetic eld on three dimensional semi-Riemannian manifolds. Then, we investigate the
trajectories of these magnetic elds and give some characterizations and examples of these curves.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classication. 37C10, 53A04.
Key words and phrases. Special curves, vectorelds, fows, ordinary dierential equations
Introduction
A charged particle moves along a regular curve in 3-dimensional space. The tangent, normal and
binormal vectors describe kinematic and geometric properties of the particle. These vectors aect
trajectory of the charged particle during motion of in a magnetic eld. Also, time dimension aects its
trajectory. Therefore, motion of the charged particle in a magnetic vector eld should be investigated
considering time dimension. In this article, we investigate eects of magnetic elds on charged particle
trajectories by variational approach to magnetic ow associated with Killing magnetic eld on a three
dimensional semi-Riemannian manifold M .
A divergence free vector eld denes a magnetic eld in a three dimensional semi-Riemannian manifold M . It is known that V 2
skew-symmetric operator in T p(M n ), at each point p 2 M n . It is clear that any Killing vector eld on
(M n ; g) is divergence-free. In particular, if n = 3, then every Killing vector eld denes a magnetic eld
which will be called a Killing magnetic eld(see for details ref.[3]).
Lorentz force
and trajectories
= ( 0) = V
1
(1)
where r is the Levi-Civita connection of the manifold M (in this article we call these curves as Tmagnetic curves to avoid confusion with other denitions): Using Eq.(1) we can study the magnetic
eld in a space which has non-zero sectional curvature C. So, this gives more important and realitic
approach than the classical approach. Also, this equality and the Hall eect (explains the dynamics of
an electric current ow in R3 when exposed to a perpendicular magnetic eld V ) have some important
applications in analytical chemistry, biochemistry, atmospheric science, geochemistry, cyclotron, proton,
cancer therapy and velocity selector. Solutions of the Lorentz force equation are Kirchho elastic rods.
This provides an amazing connection between two apprently unrelated physical models and classical
elastic theory. The Lorentz force is always perpendicular to both the velocity of the particle and the
magnetic eld created it. When a charged particle moves in a static magnetic eld, it traces a helical
path and the axis of helix is parallel to the magnetic eld. The speed of particle remains constant.
Since the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the motion, the magnetic eld does no work on an
isolated charge. If the charged particle moves parallel to magnetic eld, the Lorentzian force acting on
the particle is zero. When the two vectors (velocity and the magnetic eld) are perpendicular to each
other, the Lorentz force is maximum (see for details ref. [2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9]).
When a charged particle moves along a curve
and binormal vectors be exposed to the magnetic eld. Then forces associated with the magnetic eld
for motion in the normal and binormal directions of the curve are given by
(N ) = V
N and (B) = V
B;
and the trajectories of charged particle are changed according to this equation. For example; when a
charged particle moves in a static magnetic eld in 3D Riemannian space the particle has a two dierent
paths. If one of the tangent or binormal vectors is exposed to this eld, it traces a circular helix path.
On the other hand, if the normal vector is exposed the this eld, it traces a slant helical path. Also,
their axes are parallel to the magnetic eld (see ref. [5]).
Preliminaries
Let (M; g) be a 3 dimensional semi-Riemannian manifold with the standard at metric g dened by
g(X; Y ) = x1 y1 + x2 y2
x3 y3
(2)
(3)
for all X; Y 2 (M ):
The T-magnetic trajectories of F are curves
r
= ( 0 ):
(4)
Y = (x2 y3
x3 y2 ; x3 y1
2
x1 y3 ; x2 y1
x1 y2 ):
(5)
Y; Z) = dvg (X; Y; Z)
(6)
X:
(7)
determined by V are solutions of the
=V
(8)
as
V (s) = f (s)T (s) + g(s)B(s)
(9)
where T and B are the tangent and binormal vectors of the curve , respectively (see ref. [4]).
Lemma 1 Let
: I
(M; g) with sectional curvature C and V be a vector eld along the curve .
(s; 0) = (s);
@
@s (s; t)
: ( "; ")
I ! M satisfy
@
@s (s; t)
t (s);
t (s):
@v
(s; t)
@s
@{
(s; t)
@s
"1 g(rT V; T );
(10)
t=0
t=0
(11)
@
(s; t)
@s
2"2 g((1={)r3T V
({ 0 ={ 2 )r2T V
(12)
t=0
where "1 = g(T; T ); "2 = g(N; N ), "3 = g(B; B), R and C are curvature tensor and sectional curvature
of M; respectively [4, 7]:
Also, if V (s) is the restriction to (s) of a Killing vector eld then the vector eld V satisfy following
condition
V (v) = V ({) = V ( ) = 0
[4].
(13)
Proposition 2 Let
{(s)2 6= 0: Then
is a slant helix (which is dened by the property that the normal vector makes a constant angle with a
xed straight line) if and only if
("3
{2
{2
+ "1
0
2)
is a constant function. Where "1 = g(T; T ); "2 = g(N; N ) and "3 = g(B; B) (see ref. [1]).
Proposition 3 Let
(14)
3.1
T-magnetic curves
In this section, we give some characterizations for T-magnetic curves in semi-Riemannian manifolds.
Proposition 4 Let
be a unit speed T-magnetic curve in semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g) with the Frenet
apparatus fT; N; B; {; g. From the denition of the magnetic curve we know that
(T ) = "2 {N:
Since (N ) 2 span fT; N; Bg ; we have
(N ) = T + N + B
Then using the following equalities
= "1 g( (N ); T ) =
"1 g( (T ); N ) =
= "2 g( (N ); T ) = 0;
= "3 g( (N ); B) = "3 $;
we get
(N ) =
"1 {;
Proposition 5 Let
curve
"2 $N:
be a unit speed non-null curve in semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g). Then the
is a T-magnetic trajectory of a magnetic eld V if and only if the vector eld V can be written
as
V = "3 ($T + {B):
Proof. Let
(16)
is a N-magnetic
be a unit speed T-magnetic curve and V be a Killing vector eld on a simply connected
"3 { 00
"2 { ($ + )
(17)
(18)
(19)
"2 { $
"2 {
)B:
(20)
$
+ ) + "1 A = 0
2
(21)
Similarly, Eq.(19) and Eq.(20) are considered with V ( ) = 0 in Lemma 1, we can easily see that,
"3 { 00
"2 { ($ + )
"3 C{ +
{3
2
B{ = 0:
(22)
Corollary 7 Let
be a unit speed T-magnetic curve and V be a Killing vector eld on a simply con-
nected space form (M (C); g): If the function $ is equal to zero, then the curvature and torsion of the
curve
is given by
"1 { 2
2"3 { 00 + { 3
2"2 {
2"3 C{
2B{
0:
So, we know that these two equations are just the Euler Lagrange equations for elasticae (see for details
ref. [7]) in M (C):
It is easily seen that a T-magnetic curve is a general helix in Lorentzian 3-space. Some characterizations and examples about it are detailed in the articles [4, 6].
3.2
N-magnetic curves
In this section, we dene a new kind of magnetic curve called N-magnetic curve in 3D semi-Riemannian
Manifold M . Moreover, we obtain some characterizations and examples of this curve. Also we draw the
image of these curves using the programme Mathematica.
Denition 8 Let
:I
N:
with the Frenet apparatus fT; N; B; {; g. Then the Lorentz force in the Frenet frame can be written
as
2
6
6
6
4
(T )
7 6
7 6
(N ) 7 = 6
5 4
(B)
"2 {
"3 $1
"1 {
"3
"1 $ 1
"2
32
76
7
76
7
76 N 7
54
5
B
(23)
be a unit speed N-magnetic curve in semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g) with the Frenet
"2 g( (N ); T ) =
= "3 g( (T ); B) = "3 $1 ;
we get
(T ) = "2 {N + "3 $1 B:
6
Proposition 10 Let
curve
(N ) =
"1 {T
"3 B;
(B) =
"1 $1 T + "2 N:
be a unit speed non-null curve in semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g). Then the
is a N-magnetic trajectory of a magnetic eld V if and only if the vector eld V can be written
as
V =
Proof. Let
"3 T
(24)
be a unit speed N-magnetic trajectory of a magnetic eld V: Using the Proposition 9 and
N =
is a
02
+ 2"1 (
)0
"2 C{ +
{ 3 + "2 {
2
(25)
is a constant.
rT V = ( " 3
"2 $1 {)T
(26)
"1 { 0 + "2
$1 )N + ("3 { 00 +
$1 + 2$01 )B:
(27)
(28)
Then, if Eq.(26) and Eq.(27) are considered with V ({) = 0 in Lemma 1, we obtain
"3 $001
"1 { 0 + "2
"1 { 0 + "2
$1 + "2 C$1 = 0:
(29)
Similarly, Eq.(26) and Eq.(27) are considered with V ( ) = 0 in Lemma 1, we can easily see that,
[(1={)("3 { 00 +
$1 + 2$01
"2 C{)]0 +
7
{ 2 + "2
2
= 0:
(30)
02
+ 2"1 (
)0
"2 C{ +
{ 3 + "2 {
2
is a arbitrary constant.
y(s)2 = 0:
y(s) = c2 e
log@e
(31)
p2
p3
0
p
log@e 6c1 + e
p
Thus, the curve having the curvature {(s) = 1 and torsion (s) = c2 e
1
A
are N-
ref.[11].
g(N; "3 T
"3 $ 1
.
j"1 2 +$21 +"3 { 2 j
Case 2. If N and V are spacelike vectors and these vectors span timelike plane,
cos =
g(N; V ) = kN k kV k cosh
ref.[11].
g(N; "3 T
"3 $ 1
.
j"1 2 +$21 +"3 { 2 j
Case 3. If N and V are timelike vectors in the same timecone,
cosh =
g(N; V ) =
kN k kV k cosh
ref.[11].
g(N; "3 T
1 we obtain
"3 $ 1
.
j"1 2 $21 +"3 { 2 j
Case 4. If N spacelike (resp. timelike) and V timelike (resp. spacelike) vectors in the future timecone,
cosh =
g(N; V ) = kN k kV k sinh
ref.[11].
"3 $ 1
j "1
2 +"
2
2
2 $ 1 +"3 {
g(N;V )
kN kkV k
g(N; "3 T
Corollary 14 Let
"3
8
{0
= $1
(32)
= const:
Also, Eq. (32) carry out the following equation with the dierent point of view, we get
{0 + {
) = const:
or
{2
("3 { 2 + "1
0
2 )3=2
= const:
3-space.
Example 15 We consider a spacelike N-magnetic curve
space dened by
0
B
B
(s) = B
@
p
p
p 3p 2
cos( 3
2 3( 3+2)
p
p
p 3p 2
sin( 3
2 3( 3+2)
p
p 3+2
p
2 3( 3 2)
p
p
2)s + 2p3(3+2
3 2)
cos
2s
p
2 3
+ 2)s +
+
p
cos( 3
p
sin( 3
2)s;
C
C
2)s; C
A
is a N-magnetic curve.
3 space dened by
(s) = (
4 sinh 3s 1
2
1
;
sinh 8s + sinh( 2s);
cosh 8s
15
40
5
40
2
cosh( 2s))
5
is a N-magnetic curve.
3 sinh 2s;
(s) =
3 cosh 2s;
2: So,
is a N-magnetic curve.
2:
is a circular helix whose axis of the circular helix is the vector eld V:
10
3.3
B-magnetic Curves
In this section, we dene a new kind of magnetic curve called B-magnetic curve in 3D semi-Riemannian
manifold: We obtain some characterizations and examples of this curve. Also, we draw the image of
these curves using the programme Mathematica.
Denition 19 Let
:I
(33)
(M; g) with the Serret-Frenet apparatus fT; N; B; {; g. Then the Lorentz force in the Frenet frame
written as
2
6
6
6
4
(T )
7 6
7 6
(N ) 7 = 6
5 4
(B)
"2 $ 2
"3
"2
"1 $ 2
0
32
76
7
76
7
76 N 7
54
5
B
(34)
be a unit speed non-null B-magnetic curve in 3D semi-Riemannian space with the Frenet
"3 g( (B); T ) =
"3 g(rT B; T ) =
"3 g("3 N; T ) = 0:
we get
(T ) = "2 $2 N:
Similarly, we can easily obtain that
(T ) =
"1 $2 T
"3 B;
(T ) = "2 N:
Proposition 21 Let
curve
be a unit speed non-null curve in semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g): Then the
is B-magnetic trajectory of a magnetic eld V if and only if the magnetic vector eld V can be
as
V =
"3 T + "3 $ 2 B
11
(35)
Proof. Let
"3 T + "3 $ 2 B
is a B-magnetic
"2
C
2
){ 2
(2a"2
and
+ 3"2 C){ +
{4
= :
4
(36)
are constants.
$2 )N + "3 $02 B
"3 T + "1 ({
(37)
= 0:
(38)
{)T + "1 ({ 0
"2
$2 )B:
(39)
Then, if Eq.(37) and Eq.(39) are considered with V ({) = 0 in Lemma 1, we obtain,
["1 ({ 0
2$02 ) = 0
(40)
"2 $2
{2
2
= 0;
= const:
(41)
"2 $ 2
"2 C$2 +
{3
2
B{ = 0;
= const:
(42)
"2 C
2B){{ 0
(2a"2
+ 3"2 C){ 0 + { 3 { 0 = 0;
= const:
(43)
"2
C
2
){ 2
(2a"2
12
+ 3"2 C){ +
{4
= ;
4
= const:
(44)
2 and
di erential equation
y(t)4
5=0
4
we obtain Figure 4 and Figure 5 by using the programme Mathematica:
y 0 (t)2 + 4y(t)2
5y(t) +
ref.[11].
g(B;
T +$ 2 B)
kV k
$2
:
j"1 2 +$22 j
Case 2. If B and V are spacelike vectors and these vectors span timelike plane,
cos =
ref.[11].
g(B;
T +$ 2 B)
kV k
$2
:
j"1 2 +$22 j
Case 3. If B and V are timelike vectors in the same timecone,
cosh =
g(B; V ) =
kBk kV k cosh
ref.[11].
g(B;V )
kBkkV k
g(B;
T +$ 2 B)
kV k
:
j 2 $22 j
Case 4. If N spacelike (resp. timelike) and V timelike (resp. spacelike) vectors in the future timecone,
1 we obtain
q $2
ref.[11].
g(B;V )
kBkkV k
j "1
$2
2 +"
2
3 $2
13
Corollary 25 Let
is rendered in Figure 6.
1
:
2
is a B-magnetic curve.
is rendered in Figure 7.
is a B-magnetic curve.
14
References
[1] Ali AT, Lopez R. Slant helices in Minkowski space. J Korean Math S 2011; 48: 159-167.
[2] Barros M, Romero A. Magnetic vortices. EPL. 2007; 77: 1-5.
[3] Barros M, Cabrerizo JL, Fernndez M, Romero A. Magnetic vortex lament ows. J Math Phys
2007; 48: 1-27.
[4] Barros M, Ferrandez A, Lucas P, Meronos MA. General helices in the 3 dimensional Lorentzian
space forms. Rocky Mt J Math 2001; 31: 373388.
[5] Bozkurt Z, Gk I, Yayl Y, Ekmekci FN. A new Approach for Magnetic Curves in Riemannian
3D Manifolds. J Math Phys 2014; 55: 1-12.
[6] Drut-Romaniuc SL, Munteanu MI. Killing magnetic curves in a Minkowski 3-space, Nonlinear
Anal-Real 2013; 14: 383396.
[7] Grbz N. p-Elastica in the 3-Dimensional Lorentzian Space Forms. Turk J Math 2006; 30: 33-41.
[8] Hasimoto H. A soliton on a vortex lament. J Fluid Mech 1972; 51: 477485.
[9] Hasimoto H. Motion of a vortex lament and its relation to elastica. J Phys Soc Jpn 1971; 31:
293294.
[10] Neovic E, Petrovic-Torgaev M, Verstraelen L. Curves in Lorentzian Spaces. B Unione Mat Ital
2005; 8: 685-696.
[11] Ratclie JG. Foundations of Hyperbolic Manifolds. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
15