Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KNOWLEDGE AS-A-WHOLE
Ron Paul news and information | Main | Now the time has come, TO MAKE DEMANDS at
DEMONSTRATIONS
C
Y
E
O
L
U
E
N
B
G
S
S
M
I
T
O
M
B
A
R
P
O
R
E
G
W
T
E
I
A
T
T
N
H
G
O
J
C
L
R
U
O
E
G
I
N
A
A
C
C
R
N
E
E
N
Email Me
++++++++++++++++++
+ Pay forward w/PayPal +
++++++++++++++++++
L
D
T
A.
++++++++++++++++++
++ We accept Bitcoins ++
++++++++++++++++++
The most significant challenge to federal court jurisdiction is being filed shortly as a class action
challenging the jurisdiction of the DOJ to incarcerate federal prisoners. LAW is a group
dedicated to the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. The lawsuit, in D.C., seeks
expungement plus $3,000/day/person. Cost is $2,000 to cover expenses.[1]
B.
H
S
D
M
I
U
E
O
G
P
T
R
H
P
O
E
L
X
The Challenge
Our group has obtained and verified the evidence directly from Congress that Public Law 80-772
was never passed by Congress, the only statute which gives the court jurisdiction to indict and
convict on any crime (Title 18, Title 21, Title 26). No court has addressed the challenge as
presented
nor
from
Q
Uproperly[2],
A
L the evidence
I
T obtained
Y by us directly
I
O Congress.
D
IOver 3Nyears,Eall
administrative
and
court
remedies
have
been
exhausted.
E
M
E
N
T
I
C.
One of the most significant cases in recent history related to jurisdiction and the right to
challenge a federal statute was ruled on by the Supreme Court on June 16, 2011. In Bond v.
United States, No. 09-1227, the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, ruled that Bond had standing
to challenge a federal statute on grounds that the measure interferes with the powers reserved
to States, pg. 3-14. Anything in repugnance to the Constitution is invalid or unlawful. Bond,
supra.
Bond now opens the door for us to challenge 18 USC section 3231, part of the enactment of Title
Minority Demand
English Common Law v. Roman Civil
Law (Mixed Jurisdictions: common
law vs. civil law [codified and
uncodified]) - Part I and II by William
Tetley, Q.C.
Chris Ruddy (owner of NewsMax) with
his pal serial rapist, pedophile and
deadbeat dad Bill Clinton
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
D
L
S
O
G
E
I
T
P
E
A
E
O
P
T
D
R
O
R
E
R
Y
A
B
H
S
L
R
I
A
E
E
M
L
A
A
A
T
R
T
L
H
A
I
E
A By LAW
S
D. E Services Provided
Y
Y
A
N
C
R
N
H
A
L
E
R
Class
M action
O challenging
R
E jurisdiction
S
-
E
D
I
R
N
A
N
N
January 2015
T
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
O
O
W
R
Y
S
April 2014
V
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
I heard your show last night. You were awesome!! Joe F. Cal., 9/28.11. (LAW has been on
radio talk shows 6 times in the last few weeks explaining the class action.)
November 2013
Over 50 wins!
N
M
L
L
A
O
I
E
T
O
T
A
U
D
H
R
Only research group accepted directly 5 times on habeas into Supreme Court!
A
What
Karen F.
S you
Wwrote Iis awesome!
N
GHabeas,
S NDCal, 8/25/11.
I
N
U
M
O
R
O
T
A
T
Massive
Grand Jury Fraud
uncovered!
C.D.Cal.,
6/1/11.
M
Youre known for not quitting until you get results. G. Spry, S.D.W.Va., 6/10/11.
E
O
L
Revised 10/22/11
S
I
Z
A
++++++++++++++++++
WHY THE BOP DOES NOT WANT YOU TO JOIN THE CLASS ACTION
B
S
X
After 9 years of research, we have established conclusively by fact and law that Public
Law 80-772 was never enacted by Congress, which contains 18 USC 3231, the only statute
allowing a court criminal jurisdiction, making illegal any charge or conviction.
The BOP admitted that in an internal memo from Harley Lappin, BOP Director (below).
The facts in the memo have been verified. Thus any court has no jurisdiction to sentence. The
BOP Budget for FY 2011 is $6.8 Billion, a 10% increase from 2010.[3] We have already caught
one warden giving legal advise.[4] Trust me, I am from the government. Or is it about
money? Below is memo:
T
I
B
M
H
M
E
O
E
P
O
R
R
R
R
R
E
T
O
G
I
++++++++++++++++++
Attention all Department Heads, there has been a large volume of inmate Requests for
Administrative Remedies questioning the validity of the Bureau's authority to hold or classify
them under 18 U.S,C, 4081, et seq., (1948). On the claim that Public Law 80-772 was never
A
M of a Quorum
I or Majority
S
R
Eas
passed
orLsignedI In theUpresence
of bothHHousesE of Congress
required by Article I, 5, Clause 1 of the Constitution, Although most courts have, thus far,
retied on Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649(1892) to avoid ruling on the moots of these claims,
however, there have been some which have stated that they were not bound by the Field case,
D
B
I
E
S
N
C
E
O
F
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
Y
+
P
O
A
U
H
K
N
E
S
but those cases did not involve any Quorum Clause challenge. So out of an abundance of caution,
I contacted the Office of Legal . Counsel, the National Archives and the Clerk of the House of
Representatives to learn that there is no record of any quorum being present during the May 12,
1947 vote on the H.R. 3190 Bill in the House (See 93 Cong.Rec. 5049), and the record is not
clear as to whether there was any Senate vote on the H,R. 3190 Bill during any session of the
80th Congress, There is only one Supreme Court case that says in order for any bill to be valid
the Journals of both Houses must show that it was passed In the presence of a Quorum. See
United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). The Clerk of the House states that
the May 12, 1947 vote was a 'voice vote,' but the Parliamentarian of the House states that a
voice vote is only valid when the Journal shows that a quorum is present and that it's unlawful
for the Speaker of the House to sign any enrolled bill in the absence of a quorum. On May 12,
1947, a presence of 218 members in the hall of the House was required to be entered on the
Journal in order for the 44 Member 38 to 6 voice vote to be legal. It appears that the 1909
version of the Federal Criminal Code has never been repealed. Therefore, in essence, our only
G true
E authority
V is derived
I
Tfrom the
Y 1948 predecessor
B
Tto Public
T Law 80-772.2 Although
.
0
adjudication of the constitutionality of congressional enactments has generally been
A
L
T
H
Y
S
T
A
R
T
thought to be beyond the jurisdiction of federal administrative agencies, this rule is not
2
.
0
mandatory,"
according
to the Supreme Court in the case of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich,
510 U,S, 200,215 (1994), Therefore, the Bureau under the advice of the Legal Counsel feels that
it is in the best interest of public safety to continue addressing all of these Administrative
Remedy Requests by stating ,that only the Congress or courts can repeal or declare a federal
statute unconstitutional.
O
O
F
U
F
N
E
G
E
E
S
V
F
T
R
Y
H
S
M
L
A
T
++++++++++++++++++
D
B
H
S
G
M
I
E
I
A
R
O
S
N
M
L
A
R
C
E
A
T
N
E
O
F
L
U
++++++++++++++++++
F
A
M
I
A
[1] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes
from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his discretion
to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without
advising Congress of the problem.
O
Q
O
R
U
R
A
E
R
S
++++++++++++++++++
[1] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011
budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment.
Obstruction of Congress???
Y
C
O
H
U
A
N
N
G
G
E
E
D
O
F
L
I
F
A
E
S
R
O
A
C
I
N
R
O
N
I
E
N
O
N
I
O
N
O
N
I
U
A
++++++++++++++++++
Y
C
O
H
U
O
N
C
G
O
LAW specializes in the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. As of August 31, 2011,
LAW had exhausted all administrative remedies related to the class action lawsuit as well as all
court remedies, thus freeing up LAW to file the class action.
E
L
V
A
I
T
T
E
D
O
F
L
I
F
A
E
S
R
T
A
C
I
W
R
++++++++++++++++++
We currently have about 250 people on the class action. We anticipate having approximately 500
prior to filing. The brief has already been written and will be filed in the next few weeks.
Anyone wishing to join should contact us immediately.
C.
In their 9-0 ruling in Carol Ann Bond v. United States, 09-1227, the Supreme Court stated that
any act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is void. Lower courts are required to follow
Supreme Court rulings, and we have seen an improved attitude in district courts after the Bond
ruling regarding jurisdictional challenges. We currently have filed an amicus curaie brief in a
case in Denver, a case in New Jersey, the government has waived argument on a habeas case in
Houston, and the district judge in Miami has stated on the record that if the facts could be
O
R person would
C be released.
R
E OneAof the Tmembers
E of LAW hasA been interviewed on 6
proven,
the
D
O
F
-
I
F
A
S
R
F
L
C
I
O
E
++++++++++++++++++
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
As part of the class action lawsuit, LAW will also file a request for Declatory Judgment
pursuant
A
U
to 28 USC
L 2201, et Fseq., inOorder Rto forceUthe court
M to research
S
the Congressional
records and declare the statute invalid.
E.
D
O
F
L
I
F
A
E
S
R
C
A
C
I
O
R
O
N
I
R
N
++++++++++++++++++
Who Is Eligible
Anyone charged with a federal crime since 1948, pretrial, post-trial, or released.
W
R
A
E
A
R
D
C
T
I
H
H
O
I
E
V
N
E
P
E
E
T
O
W
P
O
L
R
E
K
D
O
F
U
I
F
A
N
S
R
O
I
C
I
P
T
O
N
I
P
++++++++++++++++++
L
W
E
A
O
N
DISCLAIMER: Legal Information is NOT the same as Legal Advice This site provides
M
E
S
S information
A
G aboutElaw designedBto helpOusers safely
A
R with
D their
entertainment/educational
cope
own legal needs. But legal educational information is not the same as legal advice. The
application of law varies with an individual's specific circumstances. The laws of every state are
in constant change, and although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is
accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that
our information, and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation.
E
A
^v^v^v^v^v^^v^
SPAM: We Support Responsible Email Compliance: This email cannot be considered spam as long
as we include: Contact information & remove instructions. This message is being sent to you in
compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.4176 - SECTION
M
I
L
W
A
N
T
/
101Paragraph
(e)(1)(A))
AND Bill
s.1618
TITLE
III passed
byAthe 105th U.S.
Congress.
G
UNSUBSCRIBE: Not responsible for typographical errors. Further transmissions to you may be
stopped at no cost to you by replying back with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line of the Email which was sent.
Contact Information: Most Affordable Marketing - Administrator 839 Royalwood Lane Oviedo,
Florida 32765
[1] A Major federal judge has agreed to hear the issue on October 28, 2011and release person
upon evidence. A second major federal judge issued a show cause order to government;
government waived argument.
B
B
F
E
I
O
C
T
U
O
B
N
M
I
L
D
[2] The Enrolled Bill Rule, Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 does not apply to a proper challenge,
because Munos Flores, Clinton v. N.Y., and Bond v. United States, all S.Ct. overturned Field v.
Clark.
[3] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his discretion
to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without
advising Congress of the problem.
[4] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011
budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment.
Obstruction of Congress???
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com