Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The minimum span required to classify any structure as a long span has
been a topic for debate. The encyclopedia Britannica sets the minimum
value to 30 metres whereas in D.K Chings book its 18 metres, while many
other sources just define it as a large unobstructed space. So in this
presentation we are going to explain the common techniques of
constructing slabs in concrete and also explore their limits.
Flat Plate
Flat Slab
Beam & Slab Structure
Ribbed (Waffle) Slab
Band Beam System
Slab and Joist System
Precast Concrete Slabs
Composite floor slab system
Shell Structures
Types of Concrete
slab systems
Flat Plate
Pros
Medium spans.
Limited lateral load capacity as part of a moment
frame.
May need shear heads or shear reinforcement at the
columns or larger columns
for shear.
Long-term deflection may be controlling factor.
May not be suitable for supporting brittle (masonry)
partitions
May not be suitable for heavy loads.
Cons
4m 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 10m11m12m
Span
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Thickness of slab
Flat Slab
Simple formwork
No beams simplifying
under-floor services outside
the drops
Minimum structural depth
Usually does not require
shear reinforcement at the
columns
Pros
Medium spans
Generally not suitable for supporting brittle
(masonry) partitions
Drop panels may interfere with larger
mechanical ducting
Vertical penetrations need to avoid area
around columns
For reinforced flat slabs, deflection at the
middle strip may be critical.
Cons
Span
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Thickness (mm)
Simply Supported
Fixed
Cantilever
Continuous
Overhanging
Cons
Pros
Ribbed/Waffle Slab
Cons
Requires special or proprietary formwork
Greater floor-to-floor height
Large vertical penetrations are more difficult to
handle.
Pros
Span
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Thickness (mm)
Multi Span
Single Span
The primary purpose of thickening the slab is to provide an increased drape for
the tendons that are banded in this region.
Increasing the drape allows larger upward prestressing forces to counteract the
load effects in the long direction. Depending on the span lengths and/or the
magnitude of the loads, either non-prestressed or post-tensioned
reinforcement
is used in the slab in the direction perpendicular to the bands.
Banded-beam systems are economically viable for span lengths from 35 ft to
50 ft and beyond.
Pros
Cons
Wide-module joist
systems may be
defined as joist
systems with clear
spacings of Ribs
exceeding 30 in.
Pros
More formwork
Joists and beams intrude on services
Depth of floor
Greater floor-to-floor height.
Cons
Potential savings in both materials and construction with the use of widemodule
Joist systems include:
Utilization of the top slab required for fire rating,
Elimination of 50% of the ribs,
Uniform height of the deck form with the wide beam,
Easy adjustments to fit the common range of modular column layouts,
Less field labor time for construction.
Ability to route mechanical HVAC, plumbing and electrical lines through joist open webs.
Ease of moving HVAC during life of building
Better Plenum space utilization
Floor-to-floor height can be reduced by not having to run mechanical joints under the joists
More efficient and stiffer composite design makes it possible to support a given load with a
shallower joist.
Weight svings from the joist reduces building costs.
Simplified erection, faster connections and minimal crane lifts. With fewer and simpler
connections, ironworkers dont have to align a large number of bolt holes.
Customised composite floor designs can be made for any given loading and serviceabilty.
Composite joists have been used to make floor slabs exceeding a span of 100 feet.
Precast Slab
Speed of erection
Precast slabs can typically be erected in one or two days.
Pricing
Precast flooring is more economical than cast in situ
concrete, due to the lower mass and better span to depth
ratios possible.
Thermal properties
Hollow core slabs and beam and block systems incorporating
hollow blocks provide superior insulation, although it is
recommended that an insulating screed is applied on top of
the precast units when they are used as roofs.
Features
Housing
Educational
Offices & Commercial
Industrial
Warehouses
Hospitals
Roofs
Car parks
Suspended ground slabs (heaving clays)
Hotels
Building Types
Shell structures
Single curvature shells : are curved on one linear axis and are part of a
cylinder or cone in the form of barrel vaults and conoid shells.
Double curvature shells : they are either part of a sphere or a
hyperboloid of revolution.
and use less much lesser concrete and steel for the same span.
Advantage : a folded plate structure may be formed in the same cost as a horizontal plate structure
Principle components:
Barrel vaults are perhaps the most useful shell structure because they can span upto
150 feet with minimum material.
They are very efficient structures because the arched shape reduces the stresses ad
thickness in the transverse direction.
Domes of revolution
Cons
Pros
For the construction of shells concrete is the most suitable material because its a highly
plastic material that can take up any shape on centering or inside formwork.
Small sections of reinforcement bars can be bent to follow the curvature of the shell.
Once the concrete hardens into the shape of the shell it becomes a rigid member that acts
both as the structure and the covering to the building.
Why Concrete ?
Centering is the necessary temporary support that is required for on which the rcc
concrete shell structure is to be cast.
The centering of a barrel vault is less complex than that of a dome or a conoid as it has
the same curvature along its length.
Centering of shells
Literature Study
The shells were perceived as a series of parabolas supported by precast ribs, the formwork
for using in-situ concrete would have been prohibitively expensive but because there was no
repetition in any of the roof forms, the construction of precast concrete for each of the
individual section would possibly have been more expensive.
The design team went through at least 12 iterations of the form of the shells trying to find an
economically acceptable form (including schemes with parabolas, circular ribs and ellipsoids)
before a workable solution was completed. In the mid 1961, the design team found a
solution to the problem.
The shells all being created as sections from a sphere, this solution allows arches of varying
length to be cast in a common mould, and a number of arch segments of common length to
be placed adjacent to one another to form a spherical section.
Case Study
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Span in metres
Hollow
Core
10
15
20
THANK YOU
Devika (072)