Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20. Embick, D., R. Noyer (1999), Locality in Post-Syntactic Operations, MIT Working
Papers in Linguistics, 34.
21. En, M. (2004), Functional Categories in Turkish. The Proceedings of the Workshop
Altaic Formal Linguistics I, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 46.
22. Fries, Charles C. (1957), The Structure of English, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
23. Fromkin, V., R. Rodman (1998), An Introduction to Language, sixth edition, Thomson
and Heinle.
24. Giering, D. et al. (1979), A University Handbook, VEB Verlag Enzyklopdie Leipzig.
25. Gonzlez Torres, Elisa (2009), Affixal Nouns in Old English: Morphological Description,
Multiple Bases and Recursivity, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of La Rioja, Spain.
26. Gonzlez Torres, Elisa (2010), The Inflection-Derivation Continuum and the Old
English Suffixes -a, -e, -o, -u, Atlantis, 32.1, pp. 103-122.
27. Greenbaum, S., R. Quirk, (1990), A Students Grammar of the English Language,
Longman.
28. Halle, M., A. Marantz (1994), Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology, A.
Carnie et. al (eds.). Papers in Phonology and Morphology MITWPL, 21.
29. Howard, Philip (1984), The State of the Language, Pelican Books, London.
30. Iarovici, Edith (1973), A History of the English Language, E. D. P., Bucharest.
31. Iarovici, Edith (2002), Engleza american, Ed. Teora, Bucharest.
32. Jespersen, Otto (1955), Growth and Structure of the English Language, Doubleday &
Company, New York.
33. Kastovsky, Dieter (1968), Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by Means of a
Zero Morpheme, Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universitt, Tubingen.
34. Kayne, R. S. (1994), The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.
35. Kelepir, M. (2001), Topics in Turkish Syntax: Clausal Structure and Scope, Ph. D. Thesis,
MIT.
36. Kornfilt, J. (1996), On Copular Clitic Forms in Turkish, ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 6.
37. Kural, M. (1997), Postverbal Constituents in Turkish and the Linear Correspondence
Axiom, Linguistic Inquiry, 28.3.
38. Leech, G., Jan Svartvik (1975), A Communicative Grammar of English, Longman Group
U.K. Limited.
39. Lewis, G. L. (1967), Turkish Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Macmillan (2002), English Dictionary for Advanced Students, International Student
Edition, Oxford, London.
41. Mairal Usn, Ricardo and Francisco Corts Rodrguez (2000-2001) Semantic
Packaging and Syntactic Projections in Word Formation Processes: the Case of Agent
Nominalizations, Revista Espaola de Linguistica Aplicada, 14, pp. 271-94.
42. Marchand, Hans (1963), On a Question of Contrary Analysis with Derivationally
Connected but Morphologically Uncharacterized Words, English Studies, no. 44, pp.
176-187.
43. Marchand, Hans (1967), Expansion, Transposition and Derivation, D. Kastovsky,
Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation. Selected Articles by Hans Marchand, Wilhelm
Fink, Mnchen, pp. 322-337.
44. Marchand, Hans (1969), The Categories and Types of Present-Day English WordFormation, second edition, Beck, Mnchen.
45. Mencken, H. L. (1955), The American Language, New York.
46. Pesquera Fernndez, Laura (2009), Transparent and Opaque Word-formation in the
Derivational Paradigms of Old English Strong Verbs, Unpublished Ph. D. thesis,
University of La Rioja, Spain.
47. Plag, Ingo (2003), Word-Formation in English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2003.
48. Potter, Simeon (1990), Our Language, Pelican Books, London.
49. Pyles, Th. (1971), The Origins and Development of the English Language, 2nd edition,
Harcourt Brace New York.
50. Quirk, Randolph et al. (1972), A Grammar of English, Longman Group U.K. Limited.
51. Quirk, Randolph, Gabrielle Stein (1994), English in Use, Longman Group U.K. Limited,
England.
52. Rizzi, L. (2004), Locality and Left Periphery, A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond.
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, OUP, Oxford.
53. Rizzi, L. (2005), On some Properties of Subjects and Topics, L. Brug, G. Giusti, N.
Munaro, W. Schweikert, G. Turano (eds.), Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di
Grammatica Generativa, Cafoscarina, Venezia.
54. Robertson, Stuart (1958), The Development of Modern English, New Jersey.
55. Sproat, R. (1985), On Deriving the Lexicon, MIT.
56. tekauer, Pavol (1996), A Theory of Conversion in English, Peter Lang, Frankfurt.
57. tekauer, Pavol (1997), On the Semiotics of Proper Names and Their Conversion,
Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 27-36.
58. tekauer, Pavol (2006), On the Meaning Predictability of Novel Context-Free Converted
Naming Units, Linguistics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 489-539.
59. tekauer, Pavol, Rochelle Lieber (eds.) (2005), Handbook of Word-Formation, Springer,
Dordrecht.
60. Sundby, Bertil (1995), English Word-Formation as Described by English Grammarians
1600-1800, Novus Forlag, Oslo.
61. Swan, Michael (1980), Practical English Usage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
62. Tournier, Jean (1985), Introduction descriptive la lexicogntique de langlais
contemporain, Slatkine, Genve.
63. Townson, A. Nigel (1995), Language and Languages in Contemporary Britain, Clusium,
Cluj-Napoca.
64. Valera, Salvador (2006), Conversion, K. Brown, Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics, second edition, Elsevier, Boston, MA, vol. 3, pp. 172-175.
65. Williams, Edwin (1981) On the Notions Lexically Related and Head of a Word,