Civil Procedure 2015 Prof. Solomon F. Lumba Recitation Recitation is voluntary and will co mprise 20% of your final grade. The de on ie anbee of acseptable recitations, follow 050° 1240, 2°30, 392.75 2 os oS 135 5; 9=1.25; 10=1.0. You can confirm after each class if your recitation was Attendance Perfect attendance = +.25 in the final grade. Late = absent. No excused absence for whatever reason. However, you are given 2 absences to use as you wish. Every absence thereafter will result in your final grade being diminished by .125. You can confirm after each class if your attendance was recorded. Quizzes Pre-announced quizzes will comprise 80% of your final grade. Quizzes always cover the subject matter taken up sifice the start of the semester. The student/s who get the highest point total will receive a quiz grade of 1.0. The others will receive a quiz grade based on a sliding scale of 4% increments, Thus, a student with a point total within 4% of the highest will get a quiz grade of 1.25. Bonus ‘An additional +25 in the final grade will be given to those who can be mindful in a cross-legged position for 25 minutes. 1.0/Finals/Removals Only one student willbe given a grade of 10, except when there is Se A grade of 25 ot better at soar ral ol can wmrebster age ang inte acct tie quinats, seid eo attendance, will exempt enccadent from taking the final exam. For those who must take che final exam, the best grade that they can get is a 2.5. No removal examination will be given. References Code (downloadable online) ae Ce Coat Dos Mindfulness Meditation Do To Your Brain? om , c year blog (2014/06/12 /whar-does-mindfulness-mnedi crican.com/guest-blog, Iusp:/Zblogs.scientiticamert cout by tationWilliam Bodri. The Little Book of Meditation. Pages 125-135 (handout) ‘There is no prescribed textbook. Consulations sflumba@yahoo.com; 09399193295; Library Meeting Room 1 L Subject Matter Jurisdiction ‘A. Original (exclusive/concurrent) 1. Supreme Court: section 5(1), article VII, Consts paragraph A, section 7, article PX, Constitution; section 2, Rule 64; section 1-4, Rule 65; section 1, Rule 43; sec. 18, art. VIL, Const; section 1, Rule 56; paragraph 4, section 4, Sandiganbayan law Tijam v Sibonghanoy, 23 5 29 (1968) Sy v Coslap, 365 S 49 (2001) St. Martin Funeral Homes v CA, G.R. No. 130866, 16 September 1998 “Manchester Development » CA, 149 $ 562 (1987) ‘Sun Insurance v Asuncion, 170 5 274 (1989) 2, Court of Appeals: Section 9(1)(2), BP 129; section 1, 4, Rule 65; Rule 415 3, Regional Trial Court: section 19, 21, BP 129; SC Admin Circular 09-94; section 10, Rule 47; section 1, Rule 63 Russel » Vestl, 304 S 738 (1999) Malana v Tappa, GR. No, 181303, 17 September 200? ‘Scabitsana » Maertegai, GR. No. 181359, 5 Angust 2013 4. Municipal Tail Court section 32-35, 382), BP 129; SC Admin Circular 09-94 Fernandez International, 316 § 326 (1992) B. Appellate (exclusive/concurtent) 1. Supreme Court: section 5@), aticle VIE Const; section 1, Rule 45; section 2), * Rule 41; section 5(2), Article VIII, Const; Section 30, Article VI; section 1, Rule 56; section 3(€), Rule 122; jan v Desierto, 295 S 470 (1998) Foeet ‘Marble v CA 225 § 249 (1993)2. Court of Appeals: sectic a 43; section 1, Rule 42 ion (2)(a)(b), Rule 41; Section 93), 22, BP 129; section 1, Rule 3. Regional Trial Cour: section 1, Rule 40; Section 22, BP 129 Tl. Venue: Rule 4; Article 360, RPC; section 1(¢), Rule 16 Daraycay » LAC, 195 S 641 (1991) Davao Light v CA, G.R. No. 111685, 20 August 2001 Hemandez ». DBP, 71 5 290 (1976) Unimaster » CA, 267 S 759 (1997) Adamos v J.M. Tuason, 25 SCRA 529 (1968) Cabutiban v Landcenter, G.R. 146594, 10 June 2002 Infante v Aran, GR No. 156596, 24 August 2007 Baritua v CA, 267 S 331(1997) Philippine Banking v Tensuan, 228 S 385 (1993) TIL. Cause of Action: Rule 1; sections 1-4, 6, Rule 2; section 5(b), Rule 6 A. General ‘Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld. Reasoning.” hrrp://www Heirs of Nala v Cabansag, G. Far East Marble » CA supra me Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial wandedu/ facults /edonshuc /courses/ prop/mat/Hohfeld pdf No. 161188, 13 June 2008 B. Joinder; section 5, Rule 2; section 6, Rule 3; sections 2, 6, RSC'; IA, B (last par.), RSP* Flores » Mallare Philipps, 144 § 277 (1986) Republic v Hernandez, 253 S 509 (1996) Pantranco v Standard, 453 5 482 (2005) IV. Parties |A.. Real party in interest; section 2-4, 11, 13-15, 18-19, 21-22, Rule 3 , 199 S205 (1991) i Ee Peursem "AM. No. RT]-01-1662, 26 November 2001 Premium Marble v CA, 264 5 11 (1996) BB. Necessary and indispensible pasties: sections 7-10, Rule 3; art 487, NCC No, 08-8-7-S, 1 October 2008 {Procedure on Small Claims Cases, AM 1 Octo 1 Rule of Pre 2 Revised Rules on Summary ProcedureAreelona v. CA, 280 S 20 (1997) De Guia v. CA, G.R. No. 120864, 8 October 2003 Baloloy v. Hular, G.R. No. 157767, 9 Se Ge _ ber 2004 Adlawan v. Adlavan, 479 § 275 2005) C. Class suits: section 12, Rule 3 Newsweek v LAC, 142 $ 171 (1986) MURS Publications v Islamic, G.R. 135306, 28 January 2003) D. Deceased parties: sections 16-17, Rule 3 V. Pleadings A. Complaint 1. General: Sections 1, 3, Rule 6; Section 5, Rule 1 2. Fornmt, certification, verification: Rule 7, A.M. No. 07-6-5; SC AM 00-2-10 SC Ayala Land v Valisno, 324 § 522 (2000) BA Savings » Sia, 336 5 484 (2000) Cagayan Valley Drug v CIR, G.R. No, 151413, 13 Feb 2008 Santos » CA, 360 S521 (2001) Cavile v Cari, 400 S 255 (2003) MC Engineering v NLRC, 360 5 183 (2001) Hamilton v Levy, 344 5 821 (2000) Sevileja v Laggui, 362 S715 (2001) 3, Alleging causes of action: sections 1-2, 5, 6, 9, Rule 8; section 16(9), Rule 16 Tantuico » Republic, 204 $ 428 (1991) 4, Alleging capacity to sue: section 4, Rule §; section 16(4), Rule 16 5, Alleging compliance with conditions precedent: section 3, Rule 8; section 16(), Rule 6. cee out: section 12, Rule 8 B. Answer 1. General: section 4, Rule 6; section 1, 2, 1, Rule 11; Rule 22 2, Alleging defenses: section 5, Rule 6; section 2, 7-8, 10-11, Rule 8; section 1, Rule 9 Philippine American General Insurance» Set Lines GR. No, 87434, 5 August 19923. Bill of particulars: Rule 12 4. Default section 3, Rule 9 Garcia v CA, 209 5 732 (1992) Filinvest v CA, 182 5 664 (1990) Talsan v Baliwag, G.R. No. 126258, 8 July 1999 5. Counter-claims: section 2, 6-7, 9, Rule 6; section 2, Rule 9; sections 4, 8-10, Rule 11; Art. 1283, NCC; section 13, RSC; section 3(A), 5, RSP Meliton v CA, 216 S 485 (1992) Francisco Motors v CA, 309 S 72 (1999) Visayan Packing v Reparations Commission, G.R. No. L-29673, 12 November 1987 6. Cxoss-claims: section 2, 8-9, Rule 6; section 2, Rule 9; sections 4, 8-10, Rule 11; 7. Third-party complaint: sections 11, Rule 6 Republic v Central Surety, 25S 641 (1968) Pascual » Bautista, 33 S 301 (1970) C. Reply: section 10, Rule 6; section 6, Rule 11 D. Intervention: Rule 19 VI. Amendments and Supplements: Rule 10 Loobrera v CA, GR. No. 80001, 27 Feb 1989 Lambino v Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 169551, 14 Jan 2007 vil. Filing A. Modes of filing: section 2-4, 11-12, Rule 13 B, Modes of service: section 5-10, 13, Rule 13 1, Personal 2. Mail 3, Substituted 4, Publication Solar v Rivafort, G.R. No. 152007, 5 August 1998VIL. Service of Summons: section 1(0), Rule 16 A. Modes of service 1. Petsonal: section 6, Rule 14 2. Substituted: section 7, Rule 14 ‘Sps. Miranda » CA, 326 S 278 (2000) Manotoc v CA, G.R. No. 130974, 16 Aug 2006 3. Publication: section 14, Rule 14; section 1(6), Rule 57 4. Any other manner: section 15-16, Rule 14; section 1(6), Rule 57 Pennoyer v Nef, 95 U.S. 714 (1878) El Blanco Espanol Filipino v Palanca, G.R. No, L-11390. March 26, 1918 Shafer v Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977) Abiavest v CA, 296 S 539 (1998) Singapore v Dakila Trading, 530 S 170 (2007) Belen v Chaves, 549 § 472 (2008) Long arm jurisdiction B. Voluntary appearance: section 20, Rule 14 : La Nawal Drug v CA, GR. No. 103200, 31 August 1994 Ejercito » Vargas, 551 S97 (2008) C. Who Can Serve: section 3, 9, Rule 14 D. Service on a Representative: 1. Domestic juridical persons: section 11, Rule 14 Villarosa v Benito, 312 S 65 (1999) Talsan v Baliwag, 310 S 156 (1999) 2. Foreign juridical persons: section 12, Rule 14; section 128, Corporation Code French Oil v CA, 295 S 462 (1998) 3, Entities without juridical personality: section 8, Rule 14; section 21, Corporation Code 4, Public corporations: section 13, Rule 14 5, Minors and incompetents: section 10, Rule 146. Substituted service: section 7, Rule 14 TX. Early Dismissal A. Dismissal by the plaintiff section 1-2, 4, Rule 17; section 6, Rule 16 BA Finance v Rufino, 224 S 163 (1993) Roxas v CA, 363 S 207 (2001) BPI vy CA, 303 5 19 (1999) B. Demurrer to evidence: Rule 33; Section 23, Rule 119 Radiowealth v Spouses Del Rosario, 335 5 288 (2000) Bernardo v CA, 278 S 782 (1997) C. Judgment on the pleadings: Rule 34 D. Summary judgment: Rule 35; section 1, Rule 17 Diman v Alumbres, 299 S459 (1998) Velasques,v CA, 309 S 539 (1999) E. Motion to Dismiss: section 9, RSC; section 4, RSP 1. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction: section 1, Rule 9; section 1(b), Rule 16; section 15, Rule 8 2. Presctiption: section 1, Rule 9; section 1(8), Rule 16; section 15, Rule 8; Sections 555, 1120-23, 1140-1147, 1155 NCC; section 5, Rule 1 Viillagonala v, LAC, 167 5 535 (1988) De Cabrera v. CA, 267 S 339 (1997) Ledesma v, CA, 224 $ 175 (1993) 3, Res judicata ltis pendentia: section 1, Rule 9; section 1(f), Rule 16; section 15, Rule 8; Section 47, Rule 39 Camara v CA, 310 5 608 (1999) Zarate v Director, G.R. No. 13334, 18 March 1919 Tan » CA, GR. No. 142401, 20 August 2001 Feliciano v CA, 287 S 61 (1998) Obando v Figueras supra Agravante v Patriarca, 183.5 113 (1990) 4, No jutisdiction over the person: section 1(), Rule 16Venue is improperly laid: section 1(c), Rule 16 6. Plaintiff ty 3, Rule 2 senna oe SaPacity to sue: section 1(), Rule 16; section 4, Rule 37-39, NCC; secti : f Intellectual Property Code 133, Corporation Code; section 160, ection Columbia Pictures v CA, 261 S 144 (1996) Philip Morris v CA, G.R. No. 91332, 16 July 1993 7. Failure to state a cause of action: Section 5(b), Rule 6 Heirs of Paes,» Torres, G.R. No. 104314, 2 February 2000 Travel Wide v CA, G.R. No. 77356, 15 July 1991 Heirs of Clavano v Genato, G.R. No, L-45837, 28 October 28 1977 8. Payment, waiver, abandonment, extinguishment: Section 5(b), Rule 6 9. Failure to comply with a condition precedent: sections 399-422, 515, Local Government Code; Article 151, Family Code; section 24, ADR Law Blardony v Coscolluela 182 S 8,25 (1990) Chung Fa v CA, 206 S 545 (1992) Guerrero » RTC, 229 § 274 (1994) Hontiveros v RTC, 309 § 340 (1999) Dy v CA, 304 S331 (1999) F. Affirmative defenses: section 6, Rule 16 G. Others: section 3, Rule 17 X. Discovery 'A. Interrogatories to parties: Rule 25 Republic v Sandiganbayan, G-R. No. 90478, 21 November 1994 Dela Torre v Pepsi, 298 S 366 (1998) Producer's Bank v CA, 285 S 385 (1998) B. Requests for admission: Rule 26 Lanada v CA, 375 § 543 (2002) . Production or inspection of documents or things: Rule 27Security Bank v CA, 323 S 330 (2000) ae 5 Physical and mental examination of persons: Rule 28 E. Depositions pending action: Rule 23 F. Depositions before action or pending appeal: Rule 24 San Luis v Rojas, 547 S 345 (2008) Dasmarinas v Reyes, (1993) Northwest v Cruz, 317 S 761 (1999) XL Pre-Trial: Rule 18; Sections LA1-IA9, AM. No. 03-1-09-SC; A.M. No. 11-1-6-SC-PHILJA Son v Son, 251 S 556 (1995) Monarch v CA, 333 S71 (2000) Ramnani v CA, 221 S 582 (1993) XII. Trial: Rule 30; Rule 31; Rule 32 XII, Judgment: Rule 36; Section 48, Rule 39; UN. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards; Section 40, ADR Law; Section 23, RA 876; De Leon » CA, 383 5 216 (2002) Manning v NLRC, 195 ‘S155 (1991) ‘Lichanco v Tan Pho, 51 P 862 (1923) ‘St, Aviation » Grand International, G.R. 140288, 23 October 2006 Mijares v Ranada, 455 S 397 (2005) XIV. Execution Rule 39; Section 14, Rude 57; Section 7, Rule 61; 1144(3), NCC; 'A. Matter of sight and discretionary execution: sections 1-3, Rule 39 Philippine Bank of Communications » CA, 344 S 596 (1997) Planters Products v CA, 317 5 195 (1999) B. Executory but not final judgments: sections 4-5, Rule 39; section 12, Rule 43; section £8(b), Rule 42; section 21, RSP C. Revival of judgment: section 6, Rule 39 Terry v People, 314 S 669 (1999) Republic v CA, 260 S 344 (1996) Pascual v Bastista supraD. Execution after death: section 7, Rule 39; section 5, Rule 86 E. Formalities: sections 8, 14-15, 17-22, 44-45, Rule 39 F. Kinds of execution: sections 9-11, 39-43, Rule 39 Perla v Ramolete, 203 § 487 (1991) G. Exempt properties: section 12, Rule 39 H. Third party claim (terceria): section 16, Rule 39; section 14, Rule 57; section 7, Rule 60 ‘Transfer of ownership: sections 23-26, 33, Rule 39 J. Redemption: sections 27-33, Rule 39 K. Revival of judgment: section 34, Rule 39 Right against co-defendants or third parties: sections 35, 12, 46, Rule 39 M. Discovery: sections 36-38, Rule 39 XV. Post-judgment Remedies A. Motion for New Trial/Motion for Reconsideration: Rule 37; section 3, Rule 41 Nopes v CA, 469 5 633 (2005) Velasco v Ortiz 184 S 303 (1990) Fajardo v CA, 354 S 736 (2001) B. Petition for Relief from Judgment: Rule 38 Goldline v Ramos, 363 S 262 (2001) Twason v CA, 256 5 158 (1996) C. Petition for Annulment of Judgment: Rule 47; section 9@), BP 129 ‘Lancaro Rural Bank, GiB. No, 139895, 15 August 2003 D. Ordinary Appeal 4, From MTC to RTC: Rule 40; section 23, RSC 2. From RTC to CA 10Non-ay ;Ppealable orders: section 1, Rule 41 Period: section 3, Rule 41 Notice of appeal vs. record on appeal: sections 5-8, Rule 41 Perfection of appeal: section 9, Rule 41 €. Residual jutisdiction: sections 9, 13, Rule 41 Abubakar v Abubakar, 317 5 264 (1999) Five Star v CA, 259 S 120 (1996) f. Applicability of Rule 41 to Rule 40: section 8-9, Rule 40; section 1(h), Rule 41 g. Harmless error; section 6, Rule 51 h. Exroneous appeal; sections 1-2, Rule 50 i, Withd:awal of appeal; section 3, Rule 50 E, Extraordinary Appeals 1. From M © to RVC to CA: Rule 42; section 2(b), Rule 41 2. From RTC to SC: Rule 45; section 2(0), Rule 41; section 6, Rule 56; section 5(2)(e), 1987 Const. Paa v CA, 282 § 448 (1997) 3. From CA to SC: Rule 45; section 2(0), Rule 41 4, From quasi-judicial agencies to CA: Rule 43 XVI. Provisional remedies |A. Preliminary attachment: 1. Grounds: section 1, Rule 575 sections 14-16, Rule 14 Cuartero v CA, 212 5 260 (1992) Late 2 Nn 1126 Pb 1, 2008 2. Procedure for grant: sections 2-4, Rule 5 nvpene avao Light v CA, 204 § 303 (1991) 3. Pri HOF OF contemporaneous service of summons: section 5, Rule 57 Master Tours » CA, 219 § 321 (1993) 4. Duration, discharge: sections 5, 12, 13, Rule 57 Audlawan v Tomol, 184 S 31 (1990) 5. Damages: sections 17, 20, Rule 57 B. Preliminary injunction: 1. Grounds: sections 1, 3, Rule 58 Devesa v Arbes, G.R. No. 4891, 23 March 1909 Marquez, v Sanches, 515 SCRA 577 (2007) Social Security Commission v Bayona, GR} Asnar Brothers » CA, G.R. Nu, 1281 30 May 1962 2. Proceduse for grant: sections 2, 4-5, Rule 58 Adao » Lorenzo, 316 $570 (1999) 3, Prior or contemporaneous service of summons: section 4(¢), Rule 57 4. Duration, discharge: sections 5, 6, Rule 57 Federation v CA, 246 5 175 (1995) Santiago v Vasquer, 217 S633 (1993) 5, Damages: sections 8, Rule 57 Paramount v CA, 310 S 377 (1999) 6. No injunctions: PD 1818, labor code PEZA v Vianzon, 336 5 309 (2000) Philippine Ports v CA, 253 S 212 (1996) C. Replevin 1, Ground: sections 1-2, Rule 60 12ie Chiao Liong v CA, 228 S 75 (1993) 2. Procedure for grant: sections 1-3, Rule 60 3. Discharge: section 5-6, Rule 60 4. Damages: sections 9-10, Rule 60 D. Receivership: 1. Grounds: section 1, Rule 59 2. Procedure for grant: sections 1-2, Rule 59 3. Duration, discharge: section 3, 8, Rule 59 4. Powers: sections 6-7, Rule 59 5. Damages: section 9, Rule 59 E, Support pendente lite: Rule’6t XVII. Special Civil Actions A. Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus 4. General: Rule 65; section 5(1), article VIII, Const. Liberty » CA, supra 2. Public, private actions: section 2, Rule 2; sections 2-3, Rule 66; section 4, Rule 110; ‘Arts. 695, 699, 701, 703, New Civil Code; Sec. 5, Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases; ‘Sec. 18, Art. VIL, 1987 Constitution David » Arrayo, GR. No. 171396, 3 May 2006 5, Standing, zeal pasty in interest: sections 23, 12, Rule 3 David » Arroyo, supra Seis » on nae Com GR No. 6250, a Ange 1910 Kilosbayan v Guingona, GR. No- 113375, 5 May 1 Symaco Trading v Santos, GR No, 142474, 18 August 2005 4, Facial challenge BEE White Light Corporation v City of Manila, GR. No, 122846, 20 January Estrada v Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 19 Never 200) om B. Forecl 5 ‘oreclosure: Rule 68; General Banking Law Sec. 47; RA 3135 Sec. 7 A.M. 99-10-05-O Limpin » IAC, G.R. No. 70987, Teer a lo. , 29 Seplember 1988 C. Contempt: Rule 71 Wicker v Arcangel, GR. No. 112869, 29 January 1996 Quinio v CA, G.R. No. 113867, 13 Jub 2000 ‘San Luis v CA, G.R. No. 142649, 13 September 2001 People v Godoy, G.R. Nos. 115908, 29 March 1995 D. Petition for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus; Rae 65; A.M. 00-2.03 SC E. Quo Warranto: 1. Public action: sections 1-3, Rule 66 2. Private action: section 5, Rule 66 ‘Mendoga v Alas, G.R. No. 131977, 4 February 1999 F, Declaratory Relieft Rule 63 Malana » Tappa, supra Sabitsana v Muertegui, supra Ofc of te Ombudsman Toy, G-R. No. 137538, 3 September 2001 COA y Province of Cebu, GR. No. 141386, 29 November 2001 Visayan Packing » Reparations Comision, sMpra G. Forcible Entry/Unlawful Detainer 1. Grounds: sections 1-2, Rule 70 Maddamn v judge of Manipal Court of Manila, C. No 48940, 22 June 1943 ‘$y Ob v Gana, G-R. No, 129328, 30 Jane 1969 2. Preliminary mandatory injunction: section 15, 20 Rule 70 3, Judgment: section 18, Rule 70; section 33(2), BP 129 144 Execunon sections 19,21, Rule 70 H Expropranua Rube 67 Rapetis » Phas Vale GR Ne 02M, foo 200?