$57,*225,*,1$/25,*,1$/$57,&/(

!21'!

"%.)'./"3425#4)/./&4(%
#/--/.(%0!4)#$5#4
-)2)::)39.$2/-% 
DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
*AQUES7!)3"%2'!DRIANO#/2/.!)SAAC7ALKERDE!"2%5
*OS&RANCISCODE-ATOS&!2!(2ENATO!RIONI,50).!##)AND&BIO3CHMIDT'/&&)
!"342!#4 "ACKGROUNDn-IRIZZISYNDROMEISARARECOMPLICATIONOFPROLONGEDCHOLELITHIASISCHARACTERIZEDBYNARROWINGOFTHECOMMON
HEPATICDUCTDUETOMECHANICALCOMPRESSIONANDORINmAMMATIONDUETOBILIARYCALCULUSIMPACTEDINTHEINFUNDIBULAOFTHEGALLBLADDEROR
INTHECYSTICDUCT/BJECTIVESn4ODESCRIBEASERIESOFEIGHTCONSECUTIVEPATIENTSWITH-IRIZZISYNDROMEATASINGLEINSTITUTIONSUBMITTEDTO
SURGICALTREATMENTANDTOCOMMENTONTHEIRASPECTSWITHEMPHASISONTHEDIAGNOSISANDTREATMENT-ETHODSn&OURWOMENANDFOURMEN
WITHAMEANAGEOFYEARSTOYEARS PRESENTING-IRIZZISYNDROMEWEREOPERATEDBETWEENAND4HEFOLLOWINGITEMS
WEREEVALUATEDCLINICALPRESENTATIONLABORATORYRESULTSPREOPERATIVEEVALUATIONOPERATIVElNDINGSPRESENCEOFCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISTYPEOF
-IRIZZISYNDROMEACCORDINGTOTHECLASSIlCATIONBY#SENDESCHOICEOFOPERATIVEPROCEDURESANDCOMPLICATIONS2ESULTSn4HEMOSTFREQUENT
SYMPTOMSWEREABDOMINALPAIN ANDJAUNDICE !LLTHEPATIENTSPRESENTEDALTEREDHEPATICFUNCTIONTESTS4HEDIAGNOSISOF
-IRIZZISYNDROMEWASINTRA OPERATIVEINSEVEN PATIENTSANDPREOPERATIVEINONE #HOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHALlSTULAASSOCIATED
WITHCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISWASOBSERVEDINTHREE CASES-IRIZZISYNDROMEWASCLASSIlEDAS#SENDESTYPE)INlVE PATIENTS
TYPE))INONE TYPE)))INONE ANDTYPE)6INANOTHER #HOLECYSTECTOMYASANISOLATEDSURGICALPROCEDUREWAS
PERFORMEDINFOUR PATIENTS/NE PATIENTWASSUBMITTEDTOPARTIALCHOLECYSTECTOMYANDCLOSUREOFTHElSTULOUSORIlCEWITH
THECENTRALPARTOFTHEINFUNDIBULA4WO PATIENTSWERESUBMITTEDTOCHOLECYSTECTOMYANDSIDE TO SIDECHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY
ANDANOTHER TOSIDE TO SIDECHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMYREMAININGTHEGALLBLADDERINSITU3EVEN PATIENTSHADANUNEVENTFUL
RECOVERYANDWEREDISCHARGEDINGOODCONDITIONS/NE PATIENTPRESENTEDAPOSTOPERATIVESEPSISDUETOASUB HEPATICABSCESSAND
WASREOPERATED4HEREWASNOOPERATIVEMORTALITY#ONCLUSIONSn4HEPREOPERATIVEDIAGNOSISOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEISDIFlCULTANDANAWARDED
SUSPICIONISNECESSARYTOAVOIDLESIONSOFTHEBILIARYTREE4HEPROBLEMMAYONLYBECOMEEVIDENTDURINGTHEOPERATIONDUETOlRMADHERENCES
AROUND#ALOTSTRIANGLE4HESUCCESSOFTHETREATMENTISRELATEDTOAPRECOCIOUSRECOGNITIONOFTHECONDITIONEVENATTHETIMEOFSURGERYAND
ADAPTINGTHEMANAGEMENTCONSIDERINGTOTHEINDIVIDUALCHARACTERISTICSOFEACHCASE
(%!$).'3n#HOLESTASISEXTRAHEPATICSURGERY"ILEDUCTDISEASESSURGERY#HOLELITHIASISSURGERY#HOLECYSTECTOMY

).42/$5#4)/.

)N  THE!RGENTINEAN SURGEON 0!",/ -)2)::) 

DESCRIBEDAPATIENTWITHPARTIALOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATIC
DUCTSECONDARYTOIMPACTEDBILIARYSTONEINTHECYSTICDUCTORIN
THEINFUNDIBULAOFTHEGALLBLADDERASSOCIATEDTOANINmAMMATORY
RESPONSEINVOLVINGTHECYSTICDUCTANDTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT
4HISPRESENTATIONBECAMEKNOWNAS-IRIZZISYNDROME
-IRIZZI SYNDROME IS A RARE COMPLICATION OF PROLONGED
CHOLELITHIASISWITHPREVALENCEFROMTOAMONGPATIENTS
WITHCALCULOSISOFTHEGALLBLADDER )TPRESENTSASPECTRUMTHAT
VARIESFROMEXTRINSICCOMPRESSIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT
TOTHEPRESENCEOFCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULA&ORTHISREASONTHE
DISEASEREPRESENTSADANGEROUSALTERATIONINTHEANATOMYDURINGTHE
PERFORMANCEOFCHOLECYSTECTOMYBYPREDISPOSINGTHEPATIENTSTOTHE
RISKOFANINADVERTENTLESIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT 

4HE DIFlCULTY SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF THE DISEASE IS

USUALLYDUETOTHEPRESENCEOFANINTENSElBROTICPROCESSAND
ANEVENTUALCOMMUNICATIONBETWEENGALLBLADDERANDCOMMON
HEPATICDUCT 
4HEOBJECTIVEOFTHISSTUDYWASTODESCRIBEASERIESOFEIGHT
PATIENTSWITH-IRIZZISYNDROMESUBMITTEDTOSURGICALTREATMENT
ANDTOCOMMENTONASPECTSOFTHEETIOPATHOGENESISANDCLINICAL
PRESENTATIONWITHEMPHASISONTHEDIAGNOSISANDTREATMENTOF
THISCOMPLICATIONOFBILIARYLITHIASIS
-%4(/$
%IGHTCONSECUTIVEPATIENTSWEREOPERATEDANDDIAGNOSED
WITH-IRIZZISYNDROMEFROM.OVEMBERTO*UNE
AT THE 'ENERAL 3URGERY $EPARTMENT h(OSPITAL DO 3ERVIDOR
0BLICO%STADUALv3O0AULO30"RAZIL

'ENERAL3URGERY$EPARTMENT(OSPITALDO3ERVIDOR0BLICO%STADUALDE3O0AULOh&RANCISCO-ORATODE/LIVEIRAv3O0AULO30"RAZIL

!DDRESSFORCORRESPONDENCE$R*AQUES7AISBERG 2UADAS&IGUEIRAS APT "AIRRO*ARDIM   3ANTO!NDR30"RAZIL% MAILJAQUESWAISBERG UOLCOMBR

YQRMDQPDU

$UT*DVWURHQWHURO



7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3"ENIGNOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT-IRIZZISYNDROME DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT

4HECLINICALANDMORPHOLOGICINFORMATIONWASOBTAINEDBYCONSULTING
THEMEDICALRECORDSOFPATIENTSINCLUDEDINTHESTUDYANDFOLLOW UPDATA
WEREOBTAINEDBYOUTPATIENTVISITS
4HEINCLUSIONCRITERIAWASCHARACTERIZATIONOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEBY
THEPRESENCEOFCHOLECYSTOLITHIASISANDDILATIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATIC
DUCTABOVETHELEVELOFBILIARYOBSTRUCTIONCAUSEDBYIMPACTEDCALCULUS
INTHECYSTICDUCTORINTHEGALLBLADDERINFUNDIBULAANDORINmAMMATORY
PROCESSDUETOTHEPRESENCEOFBILIARYSTONESWITHANORMALCOMMON
DUCTDIAMETERBELOWTHEOBSTRUCTION
4HEFOLLOWINGDATAWEREEVALUATEDTHECLINICALPRESENTATIONRESULTS
OF THE LABORATORY AND IMAGE EXAMS OPERATIVE lNDINGS PRESENCE OF
CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISTYPEOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEACCORDINGTO#3%.$%3ETAL
4ABLE&IGURE CHOICEOFTHEOPERATIVEPROCEDUREANDTHEPOSTOPERATIVE
COMPLICATIONS0ATIENTSWITHJAUNDICEINTHEINITIALCLINICALPRESENTATIONHAD
THEIRHEPATICFUNCTIONAPPRAISEDINTHEPRE ANDPOSTOPERATIVEPERIODS

4HEQUANTITATIVEVARIABLESWEREREPRESENTEDBYABSOLUTEFREQUENCY
. ANDRELATIVEFREQUENCY #ONSIDERINGTHESAMPLESIZEDATAARE
GIVENASTHEPERCENTAGEANDMEAN
2%35,43
&OUR PATIENTSWEREFEMALEANDFOUR MALE4ABLE
 4HE MEAN AGE WAS  YEARS  TO  YEARS !LL THE PATIENTS
WEREWHITE
4!",%n0RINCIPALCLINICALDIAGNOSTICANDOPERATIVECHARACTERISTICSOF
PATIENTSWITH-IRIZZISYNDROME
#ASE 3EX

4!",%  n #LASSIlCATION OF -IRIZZI SYNDROME ACCORDING TO #SENDES

ETAL
#SENDESTYPE

#HARACTERISTICS

4YPE)

%XTRINSICCOMPRESSIONINTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTBYSTONES
GENERALLYIMPACTEDINTHECYSTICDUCTORINTHEINFUNDIBULAOFTHE
GALLBLADDER

4YPE))

0RESENCEOFCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAWITHADIAMETERONETHIRDOF
THECIRCUMFERENCEOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTWALL

4YPE)))

0RESENCEOFCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAWITHADIAMETEROVERTWOTHIRDS
OFTHECIRCUMFERENCEOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTWALL

4YPE)6

0RESENCEOFCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAWHICHINVOLVESTHEENTIRE
CIRCUMFERENCEOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTWALL

!GE
#SENDES
*AUNDICE
#HOLEDOCOLITHIASIS
YR
TYPE

4YPEOFOPERATION



9ES

.O

#HOLECYSTECTOMY

&



.O

.O

#HOLECYSTECTOMY



9ES

)))

9ES

#HOLECYSTECTOMY
CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY

&



9ES

.O

#HOLECYSTECTOMY



9ES

.O

#HOLECYSTECTOMY

&



9ES

)6

9ES

#HOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY

&



9ES

.O

#HOLECYSTECTOMY
CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY



9ES

))

9ES

#HOLECYSTECTOMYCLOSURE
THElSTULASORIlCE

4HEMOSTFREQUENTSIGNSANDSYMPTOMSARESHOWNIN4ABLE4HE
MEANVALUESFORTHEHEPATICFUNCTIONEXAMSCONCERNINGTHEPATIENTS
WITHJAUNDICEN AREGIVENIN4ABLE
4!",%n3IGNSANDSYMPTOMSMOSTFREQUENTLYPRESENTEDBYPATIENTS
WITH-IRIZZISYNDROME
3IGNSORSYMPTOMS

!BDOMINALPAIN



*AUNDICE



.AUSEAANDVOMITING



#HOLURIA



&EVER



4!",%n6ALUESOFTHEHEPATICFUNCTIONTESTSINPATIENTSWITHJAUNDICE
AND-IRIZZISYNDROME
4EST
4OTALBILIRUBINMG$,

-EANVALUE

2ANGE

-AXIMUM
NORMALVALUE



 



3'/45),



 



3'045),



 



!LKALINEPHOSPHATASE5),



 



G'405),



 



3'/4SERUMGLUTAMICOXALOACETICTRANSAMINASE
3'04SERUMGLUTAMICPIRUVICTRANSAMINASE
G'40GAMMAGLUTAMYLTRANSPEPTIDASE

&)'52%  n 3CHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF #SENDES CLASSIlCATION FOR

-IRIZZISYNDROME



$UT*DVWURHQWHURO

4HEDIAGNOSISOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEWASINTRA OPERATIVEINSEVEN
 PATIENTSANDPREOPERATIVEINONE #ASE4ABLE 3EVEN
CASESWITHINTRA OPERATIVEDIAGNOSISWERESUBMITTEDTOULTRASONOGRAPHY
53 BEFORETHEOPERATIONTHATREVEALEDCHOLELITHIASISINSIX
ANDCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISWITHDILATIONOFTHEINTRAHEPATICBILEDUCTIN
ONE 4ABLE 4WO OFTHESEWEREALSOSUBMITTEDTO
ABDOMINALTOMOGRAPHY#4 THATSHOWEDGALLSTONESINONECASE

YQRMDQPDU

7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3"ENIGNOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT-IRIZZISYNDROME DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT

ANDOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONDUCTINANOTHER %NDOSCOPIC
RETROGRADECHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY%2#0 INANOTHERTWO
PATIENTSREVEALEDCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISANDAPAPILLOTOMYWASPERFORMED
FORREMOVALOFTHESTONEFROMTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT)NONEPATIENT
 #ASE4ABLE THEDIAGNOSISOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEWASREACHED
PREOPERATIVELYBYABDOMINAL53&IGURE ABDOMINAL#4&IGURE
AND%2#0&IGURE THATREVEALEDlXEDCALCULUSINTHEINFUNDIBULA
AREAOFTHEGALLBLADDERCLOSETOTHEJUNCTIONOFTHECYSTICDUCTANDTHE
HEPATICDUCTANDDILATIONOFTHEINTRAANDEXTRAHEPATICBILIARYDUCTS
ABOVETHESITEOFTHEOBSTRUCTION
4HESURGICALINCISIONUSEDWASRIGHTSUBCOSTALINSEVEN PATIENTS
ANDRIGHTTRANSVERSEINONE 4HREE PATIENTSINITIALLY
APPROACHEDBYLAPAROSCOPYWEREOPERATEDUSINGTHEOPENMETHOD
4HE INTRA OPERATIVE lNDINGS SHOWED IMPACTED STONE IN THE
INFUNDIBULA OF THE GALLBLADDER OR IN THE CYSTIC DUCT OF ALL THE
PATIENTS IN THE STUDY #HOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHAL lSTULA ASSOCIATED
WITHCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASISWASOBSERVEDINTHREE CASES)N
FOUR PATIENTSTHECYSTICDUCTWASISOLATEDWHILEINTHREE
 PATIENTS THE STRUCTURE WAS NOT IDENTIlED )NTRA OPERATIVE

&)'52%n%NDOSCOPICRETROGRADECHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY#HOLE
DOCHALDUCTCONTRASTEDUNTILTOTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT
WITHACALCULUSINTHISREGIONARROW
&)'52%  5LTRASONOGRAPHY OF BILIARY TRACT )MPACTED STONE IN THE
INFUNDIBULAOFTHEGALLBLADDERLARGEARROW ANDDILATATION
OFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTSMALLARROW

&)'52%n!BDOMINALTOMOGRAPHY$ENSEIMAGECOMPATIBLEWITH
LITHIASIS IN TOPOGRAPHY OF THE GALLBLADDER INFUNDIBULA
ANDCYSTICDUCTLARGEARROW ASSOCIATEDTODILATATIONOF
THE INTRA AND EXTRA HEPATIC BILIARY DUCTS SMALL ARROWS
ANDHEPATOMEGALY

YQRMDQPDU

CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AFTER REMOVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER WAS PERFORMED

INSEVEN PATIENTSTHROUGHTHECYSTICDUCTINTHREEANDBY
PUNCTUREOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTWITHAlNENEEDLEINTHEOTHER
FOUR)NlVE PATIENTSTHEINTRA OPERATIVECHOLANGIOGRAPHY
lNDINGSDIDNOTREVEALSIGNIlCANTALTERATIONSWHILEINONE
THE EXAM REVEALED CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS AND IN OTHER TWO 
PATIENTSTHEINTRA OPERATIVECHOLANGIOGRAPHYSHOWEDDILATIONGREATER
THANCMINTHEMAINBILIARYDUCTANDCHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS4ABLE
 )NONE ANICTERICPATIENTINTRA OPERATIVECHOLANGIOGRAPHY
WASNOTPERFORMEDDUETOTHElNDINGOFANEXTREMELYlNECYSTIC
DUCTTHATPREVENTEDITSCATHETERIZATION
-IRIZZISYNDROMEWASCLASSIlEDACCORDINGTO#3%.$%3ETAL 
ASTYPE)INlVE PATIENTSTYPE))INONE TYPE)))IN
ONE ANDTYPE)6INANOTHERONE 4ABLE 
#HOLECYSTECTOMYASANISOLATEDSURGICALPROCEDUREWASPERFORMED
IN FOUR  PATIENTS WITH -IRIZZI SYNDROME #SENDES TYPE )
4ABLE /NE PATIENTWITH#SENDESTYPE))WASSUBMITTED
TOPARTIALCHOLECYSTECTOMYCLOSUREOFTHEORIlCEOFTHElSTULAINTHE
COMMON HEPATIC DUCT WITH THE CENTRAL PART OF THE INFUNDIBULA AND
INSERTIONOF4 TUBEFORDRAINAGEABOVETHESITEOFTHEREPAIR&IGURE
 4WO PATIENTSONEWITH#SENDESTYPE)ANDOTHERWITH
#SENDESTYPE)))WERESUBMITTEDTOCHOLECYSTECTOMYANDSIDE TO SIDE
CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMYANDANOTHER WITH#SENDESTYPE)6

$UT*DVWURHQWHURO



7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3"ENIGNOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT-IRIZZISYNDROME DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT

"

&)'52%n#HOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHALlSTULA!n0ARTIALDISTALCHOLECYSTEC
TOMYLEAVINGTHECENTRALPARTOFTHEINFUNDIBULAINTACTTOBE
USEDWHENCLOSINGTHElSTULOUSORIlCEINTHECOMMONBILI
ARYDUCT"n4HEDEFECTHASBEENCOVEREDWITHOUTCAUSING
ANARROWINGOFTHEDUCTANDA4 TUBEHASBEENINTRODUCED
ABOVETHESITEOFTHEREPAIR
TOSIDE TO SIDECHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMYLEAVINGTHEGALLBLADDERIN
SITU4ABLE )NTHESEVEN CHOLECYSTECTOMIZEDPATIENTSNO
MALIGNANCYWASDETERMINEDINANYSECTIONSOFTHECHOLECYSTECTOMY
SPECIMEN)NONEPATIENTCASE WITHADIFFUSELYNODULARANDlRM
SURFACEOFTHELIVERATLAPAROTOMYANINTRA OPERATIVEHEPATICBIOPSY
REVEALEDCHOLESTASISWITHANOBSTRUCTIVEPATTERNOFTHELARGEBILIARY
DUCTSANDCHRONICALCOHOLICHEPATOPATHY4HEMACROSCOPICAPPEARANCE
OFTHEOTHERPATIENTSLIVERWASNORMALANDTHESEWERENOTSUBMITTED
TO INTRA OPERATIVE HEPATIC BIOPSY4HE COMMON HEPATIC DUCT WAS
DRAINEDINTHREE CASESANDTHEABDOMINALCAVITYWASDRAINED
INlVE PATIENTS
3EVEN PATIENTSCOURSEDWITHOUTPOSTOPERATIVECOMPLICATIONS
ANDWEREDISCHARGEDINGOODCONDITIONS/NE PATIENTPRESENTED
SEPSISONPOSTOPERATIVEDAYDUETOASUB HEPATICABSCESSANDWAS
REOPERATED!N INTRA OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED THAT
REVEALED CALCULUS IN THE DISTAL REGION OF THE CHOLEDOCHAL DUCT &OUR
DAYSLATERTHEPATIENTWASSUBMITTEDTO%2#0ANDPAPILLOTOMYWITH
REMOVALOFTHECALCULUSFROMTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT4HISPATIENT
WASDISCHARGEDONPOSTOPERATIVEDAY4HEPERIOPERATIVEMORBIDITY
WASANDTHEMORTALITYRATEWASZERO
/UTOFTHESEVEN PATIENTSWITHPREOPERATIVEJAUNDICE4ABLE
 SIX PRESENTEDNORMALIZEDHEPATICFUNCTIONTESTSDAYS
AFTERTHEOPERATIONWHILETHEREMAININGONE WERENORMALON
POSTOPERATIVEDAY.ONEPATIENTSHOWEDANYSYMPTOMSATTRIBUTABLE
TOTHEBILIARYTRACT4HEMEANDURATIONOFPOSTOPERATIVEFOLLOW UPWAS
MONTHSTOMONTHS 
$)3#533)/.
#3%.$%3ETAL CLASSIlED-IRIZZISYNDROMEINTOFOURTYPES
ASSHOWNIN4ABLETYPE)REPRESENTEDBYTHEPRESENCEOFEXTRINSIC
COMPRESSION OF THE COMMON BILIARY DUCT BY CALCULUS IN THE AREA
OFTHEINFUNDIBULAOFTHEGALLBLADDERORINTHECYSTICDUCTTYPE))
CHARACTERIZEDBYCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAWITHTHEDIAMETEROFTHE



$UT*DVWURHQWHURO

ORIlCELESSTHANOFTHECIRCUMFERENCEOFTHECOMMONBILIARY
DUCTINTYPE)))THEORIlCEOFTHECHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAHASA
DIAMETER UP TO  OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE COMMON BILIARY
DUCTANDINTYPE)6THECHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAINVOLVESTHEENTIRE
CIRCUMFERENCEOFTHECOMMONBILIARYDUCTWALLWITHTHEINmAMMATORY
PROCESS 4ABLE  &IGURE   )N THE PRESENT STUDY #SENDES TYPE )
PREVAILEDANDWASOBSERVEDINlVEPATIENTSFOLLOWEDBYTYPES))
)))AND)6WITHONEPATIENTEACH
4HEINmAMMATORYPROCESSPLAYSANIMPORTANTROLEINPROMOTING
THE ADHERENCES OF NEIGHBORING STRUCTURES MOST FREQUENTLY
INVOLVINGTHECOMMONBILEDUCTTHEDUODENUMANDTHECOLON 
#HOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHALlSTULAARISESFROMTHEINmAMMATIONOFTHE
GALLBLADDERWALLANDITSCONSEQUENTADHERENCEANDCOMMUNICATIONWITH
THECOMMONBILEDUCT )NTHEPRESENTSERIESCHOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHAL
lSTULAWASVERIlEDINTHREECASES
#HRONICINmAMMATIONOFTHEGALLBLADDERWALLISUSUALLYFOUND
IN PATIENTS WITH -IRIZZI SYNDROME AND MAY HAVE A ROLE IN THE
PATHOGENESISOFTHECANCER)THASBEENREPORTED THATTHEINCIDENCE
OFNEOPLASIAOFTHEGALLBLADDERTHATPASSESUNRECOGNIZEDINPATIENTS
WITH-IRIZZISYNDROMEISSIGNIlCANTLYHIGHERTHANTHEINCIDENCEOF
NEOPLASIAOFTHESAMEORGANINLONG STANDINGCHOLELITHIASIS
VSRESPECTIVELY 
4HEREISNOSPECIlCCLINICALORLABORATORYPRESENTATIONFOR-IRIZZI
SYNDROME .EVERTHELESS STUDIES  HAVE SHOWN THAT JAUNDICE
ABDOMINALPAINANDALTERATIONSINTHESERUMTESTSOFHEPATICFUNCTION
COMPRISEPARTOFTHEPRESENTATIONOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEINABOUT
OF THE CASES AS WAS ALSO OBSERVED IN THE PRESENT STUDY!LTHOUGH
JAUNDICE AND OR ALTERATIONS IN THE SERUM TESTS OF HEPATIC FUNCTION
WITHOUTMACROSCOPICLIVERABNORMALITIESOCCURREDINlVEPATIENTSIN
THISSERIESTHEYWERENOTSUBMITTEDTOINTRA OPERATIVEHEPATICBIOPSY
.EVERTHELESSWEADVOCATEINTRA OPERATIVEHEPATICBIOPSYWHENEVER
JAUNDICEANDORALTERATIONSINTHESERUMTESTSOFHEPATICFUNCTIONARE
FOUND/NEPATIENTCASE PRESENTEDJAUNDICEANDDIFFUSELYNODULAR
ANDlRMSURFACEOFTHELIVERATLAPAROTOMYANINTRA OPERATIVEHEPATIC
BIOPSYWASPERFORMEDTHATREVEALEDACHRONICALCOHOLICHEPATOPATHY
)N FACT CHRONIC HEPATOPATHY CAN LEAD TO THE FORMATION OF BILIARY
CALCULUSDUETOTHEHYPERSECRETIONOFBILIRUBINANDESPECIALLYEXCESS
OFMONOGLYCURONIL BILIRUBIN4HATNONCONJUGATIVEMONO HYDROGENATED
BILIRUBIN IS FORMED BY THE ENDOGENOUS ENZYMATIC ACTION OF A
B GLYCURONIDASE$UETOTHEHYPERSECRETIONOFBILIRUBINPRECIPITATION
OFCALCIUMBILIRUBINATEBEGINSINBILE 
4HEDIAGNOSISCANBESUGGESTEDWHEN53ORABDOMINAL#4FEATURES
REVEALBILIARYSTONESINTHEJUNCTIONOFTHECYSTICANDCOMMONHEPATIC
DUCTSANDASSOCIATEDTODILATIONPROXIMALTOTHEBILIARYTREE (OWEVER
ADILATEDCYSTICDUCTCANBECONFUSEDWITHTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTOF
NORMALDIAMETER THEREBYHINDERINGTHEDIAGNOSISOFTHISCONDITION
7EALSOVERIlEDSUCHDIFlCULTYINTHEPRESENTSTUDYWHEREANEXACT
PREOPERATIVEDIAGNOSISOBTAINEDANDABDOMINAL#4WASONLYACHIEVED
INONEOUTOFEIGHTPATIENTS
#HOLANGIORESONANCEISAUSEFULMETHODFORDIAGNOSISOF-IRIZZI
SYNDROME #HOLANGIORESONANCE CAN DEMONSTRATE WITH PRECISION THE
PRESENCEOFBILIARYDILATIONTHEDEGREEOFOBSTRUCTIONTHEINTRALUMINAL
OR EXTERNAL LOCATION OF THE BILIARY STONES AND ALSO IDENTIlES AND
EVALUATES THE DEGREE OF INmAMMATION AROUND THE GALLBLADDER   
#HOLANGIORESONANCEALSOCANREVEALEXTRINSICNARROWINGOFTHECOMMON
BILEDUCTCOMPLICATIONSSUCHASlSTULAANDHELPSTOSHOWANATOMICAL
VARIANTSANDMALFORMATIONS 

YQRMDQPDU

7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3"ENIGNOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT-IRIZZISYNDROME DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT

%2#0ORPERCUTANEOUSTRANSHEPATICCHOLANGIOGRAPHYCANREVEAL
NARROWINGORCOMPRESSIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT )NONEPATIENT
OFTHEPRESENTSTUDY%2#0WASPERFORMEDINTHEPREOPERATIVEPERIOD
ANDCONlRMEDTHEDIAGNOSISOF-IRIZZISYNDROME
$URINGTHEINTRA OPERATIVETHEPRESENCEOF-IRIZZISYNDROMECAN
BESUGGESTEDBYTHElNDINGOFINTENSEADHESIONBETWEENTHEGALLBLADDER
ANDTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTINTHEAREAOF#ALOTSTRIANGLE 
3URGICAL TREATMENT OF -IRIZZI SYNDROME INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING
IMPORTANTSTEPSCAREFULDISSECTIONOFTHEBILIARYSTRUCTURESCOMPLETE
REMOVALOFTHESTONESFROMTHEBILIARYTRACTANDIDENTIlCATIONOFTHE
COMMONHEPATICDUCT )NTRA OPERATIVECHOLANGIOGRAPHYSHOULDBE
PERFORMEDWHENEVERPOSSIBLEESPECIALLYINCASESWITHOUTADElNED
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OR WHENEVER -IRIZZI SYNDROME IS SUSPECTED
DURINGTHEOPERATION 
)N THE ABSENCE OF CHOLECYSTOBILIARY lSTULA #SENDES TYPE ) 
CHOLECYSTECTOMYANDREMOVALOFTHEBILIARYSTONESCONSTITUTETHETREATMENT
OFCHOICE )NTHEPRESENCEOFLITHIASISINTHECOMMONBILIARYDUCT
ANDWHENCHOLEDOCHOTOMYPRESENTSTECHNICALDIFlCULTIESPOSTOPERATIVE
%2#0WITHEXTRACTIONOFTHECALCULUSCANOFFERASAFERALTERNATIVE
ASOCCURREDWITHONEPATIENTINTHEPRESENTSERIES
#OMPLETEREMOVALOFTHEGALLBLADDEROFPATIENTSWITH-IRIZZI
SYNDROMECANBEDIFlCULTTOACHIEVEDUETOINmAMMATIONAROUND
#ALOTSTRIANGLE !NEXHAUSTIVEDISSECTIONOFTHECYSTICDUCTAND
EXPOSUREOF#ALOTSTRIANGLECANLEADTOTHEOPENINGOFAPREVIOUSLY
EXISTENT lSTULA OR TO THE IATROGENIC CREATION OF A COMMUNICATION
BETWEENTHEGALLBLADDERANDTHECOMMONBILEDUCT 4OAVOIDLESION
OFTHECOMMONBILIARYDUCTAPARTIALCHOLECYSTECTOMYCANCONSTITUTE
ASAFEALTERNATIVEINTHEMORECOMPLEXCASES 4HISMANAGEMENT
WASEMPLOYEDINONEOFOURCASESWITH-IRIZZISYNDROME#SENDES
TYPE)))NTHEPRESENTSERIESACOMPLETEREMOVALOFTHEGALLBLADDER
WASPERFORMEDINOTHERSSIXPATIENTS)NTHEREMAININGPATIENTWITH
-IRIZZISYNDROME#SENDESTYPE)6THEORGANWASLEFTINSITUDUE
TO THE ABSENCE OF DISSECTION PLANES BETWEEN THE GALLBLADDER THE
COMMON HEPATIC DUCT AND THE DUODENUM AND TO AVOID IATROGENIC
LESIONOFTHEBILIARYDUCTS
#ONCERNING THE -IRIZZI SYNDROME #SENDES TYPES )) AND )))
THEDISSECTIONINTHELEVELOFTHECYSTICDUCTANDTHEEXPOSUREOF
#ALOTSTRIANGLECANLEADTOTHEOPENINGOFAlSTULOUSORIlCEINTHE
COMMON BILIARY DUCT WITH INSUFlCIENT TISSUE FOR A SATISFACTORY
SUTURE  )N SUCH A SITUATION ONE OF THE ALTERNATIVES ISTOUSETHE
TECHNIQUEPROPOSEDBY3!.$",/-ETAL INWHICHANINITIAL
PARTIAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS PERFORMED BY ANTEROGRADE VIA WITH
PRESERVATIONOFTHEINFUNDIBULAFOLLOWEDBYOPENINGOFTHEBOTTOM
OFTHEGALLBLADDERANDREMOVALOFTHESTONESFROMITSINTERIORAND
CHOLEDOCHOPLASTYWITHSUTUREOFTHElSTULOUSORIlCEINTHEWALLOF
THE REMAINING GALLBLADDER USING ABSORBABLE THREAD4HE4 TUBE IS
INTRODUCEDINTOTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCTABOVETHEREPAIRSITE4HE
CLOSING OF THE HOLE IN THE COMMON HEPATIC DUCT SHOULD BE MADE
WITHOUTTENSIONANDWITHTHEMUCOUSMEMBRANEOFTHEGALLBLADDER
STUMPJUXTAPOSEDTOTHEMUCOUSMEMBRANEOFTHEDUCT5SINGTHE
INFUNDIBULAOFTHEGALLBLADDERCLOSETOTHEORIlCEINTHECOMMON
HEPATIC DUCT HAS THE ADVANTAGE THAT IT CONSTITUTES VASCULAR TISSUE
ANDHASAMUCOUSMEMBRANESIMILARTOTHATOFTHEBILIARYDUCT 
7EADOPTEDTHISTECHNIQUEWITHSUCCESSINTHEPATIENTWITH-IRIZZI
SYNDROME#SENDESTYPE))(OWEVERCORRECTIONOFTHElSTULOUSORIlCE
EVENWHENPERFORMEDCAREFULLYPRESENTSATENDENCYTOFORMATION
OFlBROSISANDSTENOSISINTHESUTURELINESINTHEBILIARYDUCT)FTHE

YQRMDQPDU

lSTULA CANNOT BE CORRECTED PRIMARILY A BILIOENTERIC ANASTOMOSIS

MAYBEPERFORMED 7HILEFORRECONSTRUCTIONOFTHEBILIARYDUCTIN
-IRIZZISYNDROMETYPE)6A2OUX EN 9HEPATICOJEJUNOSTOMYORSIDE
TO SIDECHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMYISUSUALLYNECESSARYASTHEINITIAL
MANAGEMENT )NTHEPRESENTSTUDYTHREEPATIENTSWERESUBMITTED
TOCHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMYONEDUETODIFlCULTYINREPAIRINGTHE
CHOLECYSTOCHOLODOCHALlSTULA-IRIZZISYNDROMETYPE))) ANDTWO
DUETOANADVANCEDDEGREEOFDILATIONOFTHEEXTRAHEPATICBILIARY
DUCT-IRIZZISYNDROMETYPE)AND)6 
0ATIENTSWITHJAUNDICEINTHEINITIALCLINICALPRESENTATIONHADTHEIR
HEPATICFUNCTIONAPPRAISEDINTHEPRE ANDPOSTOPERATIVEPERIODS!LL
SEVEN PATIENTSWITHPREOPERATIVEJAUNDICEPRESENTEDNORMALIZED
HEPATICFUNCTIONTESTSONPOSTOPERATIVEDAYANDNOPATIENTSHOWED
ANY SYMPTOMS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE BILIARY TRACT4HIS COURSE REmECTS
AN APPROPRIATE POSTOPERATIVE PERMEABILITY OF THE BILIARY TRACT /N
THEOTHERHANDTHECHRONICOBSTRUCTIONOFTHEBILIARYTRACTCANCAUSE
PERMANENT HEPATIC LESION ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE IS SOME DEGREE OF
CHRONICINFECTION )NSUCHASITUATIONDUCTALBILIARYPROLIFERATIONIS
FOLLOWEDBYPORTALlBROSIS(OWEVERPROLONGEDCHOLESTASISCANLEADTO
SECONDARYBILIARYCIRRHOSIS7HENTHECHOLESTASISISALLEVIATEDTHERECAN
BEREGRESSIONTHATISUSUALLYSLOWOFTHEHEPATICHISTOLOGICALFEATURES
ESPECIALLYEVENTUALlBROSISOFTHEPORTALZONESANDDISAPPEARANCEOF
THEINlLTRATIONOFBILIARYPIGMENTS 
4HEROLEOFMINIMALLYINVASIVESURGERYINTHETREATMENTOF-IRIZZI
SYNDROMEREMAINSCONTROVERSIAL3OMEAUTHORS CONSIDERSUCHA
CONDITIONTOBEINAPPROPRIATEOREVENCONTRAINDICATEDFORLAPAROSCOPIC
SURGERY AS THE ADHERENCES AND INmAMMATORY TISSUE IN THE AREA OF
#ALOTS TRIANGLE OFFER DIFlCULTY IN DISSECTION /THER AUTHORS  
HAVE REPORTED THAT A LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH ESPECIALLY FOR #SENDES
TYPE ) LESIONS IS FEASIBLE ALBEIT TECHNICALLY DEMANDING (OWEVER
CONVENTIONAL LAPAROTOMY IS USUALLY NECESSARY FOR THE CORRECTION OF
CHOLECYSTOCHOLEDOCHALlSTULA )NTHEPRESENTSTUDYTHREEOPERATIONS
WITH INITIAL ACCESS BY LAPAROSCOPY WERE CONVERTED TO CONVENTIONAL
SURGERYDUETOTECHNICALDIFlCULTIES
)N PATIENTS WITH -IRIZZI SYNDROME AND A HIGH OPERATIVE RISK
SATISFACTORYRESULTSCANBEOBTAINEDEITHERTHROUGHBILIARYDRAINAGE
BYENDOSCOPICPAPILLOTOMYANDPLACEMENTOFABILIARYENDOPROTHESIS
ORNASOBILIARYCATHETERASSOCIATEDWITHELECTROHYDRAULICLITHOTRIPSYBY
CHOLANGIOSCOPY 4HESEPROCEDURESUSUALLYRELIEFTHECHOLANGITISAND
THELOCALINmAMMATORYPROCESSPREPARETHEPATIENTFORSUBSEQUENT
SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND SERVE AS A GUIDE TO AVOID LESION OF THE
BILIARYDUCTS 
7ITHREGARDTOPERFECTINGDIAGNOSTICMETHODSFORBILIARYDISEASE
-IRIZZISYNDROMECONTINUESTOBEACHALLENGEFORTHESURGEON4HE
CONDITIONMAYNOTBERECOGNIZEDBYROUTINEPREOPERATIVEIMAGE
EXAMSANDTHEPROBLEMONLYBECOMEEVIDENTATTHEMOMENTOFTHE
OPERATIONINTHEFORMOFFIRMADHERENCESAROUND#ALOTSTRIANGLE
4HEMAJORFACTORFORTHESUCCESSFULTREATMENTOF-IRIZZISYNDROME
ISITSPRECOCIOUSRECOGNITIONEVENINTHEINTRA OPERATIVEANDONTHE
MODIFICATIONOFTHEMANAGEMENTACCORDINGTOTHECHARACTERISTICS
OFEACHCASE
!#+./7,%$'-%.43
4HEAUTHORSAREGRATEFULLYINDEBTEDTO'ABRIEL-ORlN*LIO:AKI
!BUCHAM.ETOAND6IVIANE!PARECIDA3OTTO"AZALIAFORTHEIRHELPFUL
INTHISMANUSCRIPT

$UT*DVWURHQWHURO



7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3"ENIGNOBSTRUCTIONOFTHECOMMONHEPATICDUCT-IRIZZISYNDROME DIAGNOSISANDOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT

7AISBERG*#ORONA!!BREU)7&ARAH*&-,UPINACCI2!'OFl&3/BSTRUOBENIGNADODUCTOHEPTICOCOMUMSNDROMEDE-IRIZZI DIAGNSTICOE

TRATAMENTOOPERATRIO!RQ'ASTROENTEROL  
2%35-/ 2ACIONAL !SNDROMEDE-IRIZZICOMPLICAORARADACOLELITASEDELONGADURAOCARACTERIZADAPELOESTREITAMENTODODUCTOHEPTICOCOMUMDEVIDO
AMECANISMODECOMPRESSOEOUINmAMAOPORCLCULOSBILIARESIMPACTADOSNOINFUNDBULODAVESCULABILIAROUNODUCTOCSTICO/BJETIVOS $ESCREVERSRIE
DEOITOENFERMOSCONSECUTIVOSCOMSNDROMEDE-IRIZZIDEUMANICAINSTITUIOSUBMETIDOSAOTRATAMENTOCIRRGICOECOMENTARSEUSASPECTOSCOMNFASE
NODIAGNSTICOETRATAMENTO-TODO 1UATROMULHERESEQUATROHOMENSCOMMDIADEIDADEDEANOSAANOS FORAMOPERADOSCOMSNDROME
DE-IRIZZIENTREE!VALIARAM SEAAPRESENTAOCLNICAOSRESULTADOSDOSEXAMESLABORATORIAISEDEIMAGEMOSACHADOSOPERATRIOSAPRESENA
DECOLEDOCOLITASEOTIPODESNDROMEDE-IRIZZIDEACORDOCOMACLASSIlCAODE#SENDESAESCOLHADOPROCEDIMENTOOPERATRIOEASCOMPLICAESPS
OPERATRIAS2ESULTADOSn/SSINTOMASMAISFREQENTESFORAMDORABDOMINAL EICTERCIA 4ODOSOSDOENTESAPRESENTARAMEXAMESDEFUNO
HEPTICAALTERADOS/DIAGNSTICODASNDROMEDE-IRIZZIFOIINTRA OPERATRIOEMSETE DOENTESEPR OPERATRIOEMUM /BSERVOU SEFSTULA
COLECISTOCOLEDOCIANAASSOCIADACOLEDOCOLITASEEMTRS CASOS!SNDROMEDE-IRIZZIFOICLASSIlCADACOMOTIPO)EMCINCO DOENTESTIPO))
EMUM TIPO)))EMUM ETIPO)6EMOUTRO !COLECISTECTOMIACOMOPROCEDIMENTOCIRRGICOISOLADOFOIREALIZADAEMQUATRO
DOENTES5M ENFERMOFOISUBMETIDOACOLECISTECTOMIAPARCIALEFECHAMENTODOORIFCIOlSTULOSOCOMAREGIOCENTRALDOINFUNDBULO$OIS
ENFERMOSFORAMSUBMETIDOSACOLECISTECTOMIAEANASTOMOSECOLEDOCODUODENALLTERO LATERALEOUTRO AANASTOMOSECOLEDOCODUODENALLTERO LATERAL
DEIXANDO SEAVESCULABILIARINSITU3ETE DOENTESEVOLURAMSEMCOMPLICAESPS OPERATRIASEOBTIVERAMALTAHOSPITALAREMBOASCONDIES5M
 ENFERMOAPRESENTOUNOPS OPERATRIOSEPSEPORABSCESSOSUB HEPTICOSENDORE OPERADO.OHOUVEMORTALIDADEOPERATRIA#ONCLUSESn/
DIAGNSTICOPR OPERATRIODASNDROMEDE-IRIZZIDIFCILENECESSRIOELEVADONDICEDESUSPEITAPARAEVITARLESESDARVOREBILIAR/PROBLEMAPODESE
TORNAREVIDENTEAPENASNOMOMENTODAOPERAONAFORMADEADERNCIASlRMESAOREDORDOTRINGULODE#ALOT/SUCESSODOTRATAMENTOESTRELACIONADOAO
RECONHECIMENTOPRECOCEDACONDIOMESMONOINTRA OPERATRIOENAINDIVIDUALIZAODACONDUTADEACORDOCOMASCARACTERSTICASDECADACASO
$%3#2)4/2%3n#OLESTASEEXTRA HEPTICACIRURGIA$OENASDASVIASBILIARESCIRURGIA#OLELITASECIRURGIA#OLECISTECTOMIA

2%&%2%.#%3





















"ECKER#$'ROSSHOLZ--ENTHA'DE0EYER24ERRIER&-2CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY

TECHNIQUEPOTENTIALINDICATIONSANDDIAGNOSTICFEATURESOFBENIGNPOSTOPERATIVEAND
MALIGNANTCONDITIONS%UR2ADIOL 
"INMOELLER+&4HONKE&3OEHENDRA.%NDOSCOPICTREATMENTOF-IRIZZISYNDROME
'ASTROINTEST%NDOSC 
#AREY-#0ATHOGENESISOFGALLSTONES!M*3URG 
#SENDES!$IAZ*#"URDILES0-IRIZZISYNDROMEANDCHOLECYSTOBILIARYlSTULAA
UNIFYINGCLASSIlCATION"R*3URG 
%NGLAND 2% -ARTIN $& %NDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF -IRIZZI SYNDROME 'UT
 
&IGUEIRA!#OSENTINO*%-&RANA 0INTO0,34RIVIO4!NASTOMOSECOLDOCO
DUODENALREALIZADAEMDOENTESCOMCOLEDOCOLITASEECOMESTREITAMENTOINmAMATRIO
DOCOLDOCO&OLHA-D 
&ULCHER!34URNER-!#APPS'7-2CHOLANGIOGRAPHYTECHNICALADVANCESAND
CLINICALAPPLICATIONS2ADIOGRAPHICS 
(ILGER$*6ER3TEEG+2"EATY0*-IRIZZISYNDROMEWITHCOMMONSEPTUMULTRASOUND
ANDCOMPUTEDTOMOGRAPHYlNDINGS*5LTRASOUND-ED 
*OHNSON ,7 3EHON *+ ,EE7# :IBARI '" -C$ONALD *# -IRIZZI SYNDROME
EXPERIENCEFROMAMULTI INSTITUTIONALREVIEW!M3URG 
+ARAKOYUNLAR/3IVREL%+OC/$ENECLI!'-IRIZZISYNDROMEMUSTBERULEDOUTINTHE
DIFFERENTIALDIAGNOSISOFANYPATIENTSWITHOBSTRUCTIVEJAUNDICE(EPATOGASTROENTEROLOGY
 
+OK+99'OH09-.GOI33-ANAGEMENTOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEINTHELAPAROSCOPIC
ERA3URG%NDOSC 
-ACHADO-!#2OCHA*2-"OVE#-ACHADO-###OLECISTECTOMIAVIDEOLAPAROSCPICA
EMPACIENTECOMSNDROMEDE-IRIZZI2EV(OSP#LIN&AC-ED30AULO 
-ARKS*7"ONOMIS'#!LBERTS'3CHOENlELD,*4HESEQUENCEOFBILIARYEVENTS
PRECEDINGTHEFORMATIONOFGALLSTONEINHUMANS'ASTROENTEROLOGY 
-ARTIN2&2OSSI2,"ILEDUCTINJURIES3PECTRUMMECHANISMOFINJURYANDTHEIR
PREVENTION3URG#LIN.ORTH!M 
-ARTINS*R%62OHR-233IQUEIRA%3"LUM6&&ERRARI*R!03NDROMEDE-IRIZZI
RELATODECASOEREVISODELITERATURA'%$'ASTROENTEROL%NDOSC$IG 

$UT*DVWURHQWHURO

 -C3HERRY #+ &ERSTENBERG (6IRSHUP - 4HE -IRIZZI SYNDROME SUGGESTED

CLASSIlCATIONANDSURGICALTHERAPY3URG'ASTROENTEROL 
 -IRIZZI0L3INDROMEDELCONDUCTOHEPATICO*)NT#HIRUR 
 .UNES##!0ETER*0INTO20'RECHI",03NDROMEDE-IRIZZIEFSTULACOLECISTOBILIAR
2EV-D3T#ASA 
 0EMBERTON-7ELLS!$4HE-IRIZZISYNDROME0OSTGRAD-ED* 
 0OSTA''5NEXPECTED-IRIZZIANATOMYAMAJORHAZARDTOTHECOMMONBILEDUCT
DURINGLAPAROSCOPICCHOLECYSTECTOMY3URG,APAROC%NDOSC 
 2EDAELLI#!"UCHLER-73CHILLING-++RAHENBUHL,2UCHTI#"LUMGART,(
"AER(5(IGHCOINCIDENCEOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEANDGALLBLADDERCARCINOMA3URGERY
 
 2OSELLO%,3ORBELLO!!#OLECISTECTOMIASLAPAROSCPICASTECNICAMENTECOMPLICADAS
'%$'ASTROENTERROL%NDOSC$IG 
 2UST +2 #LANCY467ARREN ' -ERTESDORF * -AXWELL *' -IRIZZI SYNDROME A
CONTRAINDICATIONTOCOELIOSCOPICCHOLECYSTECTOMY*,APAROENDOSC3URG 
 3ANDBLOM04ABRIZIAN-&LUCKIGER!2EPAIROFCOMMONBILEDUCTDEFECTSUSINGTHE
GALLBLADDERORCYSTICDUCTASAPEDICLEDGRAFT3URG'YNECOL/BSTET 
 3CHREIBER *" 2OSENTHAL ,% 3COVILL 7! .ELSON!, 4HE -IRIZZI SYNDROME
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS BY ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY 'ASTROINTEST
%NDOSC 
 3COTT #ONNER#%'ROGAN*"4HEPATHOPHYSIOLOGYOFBILIARYOBSTRUCTIONANDITS
EFFECTONPHAGOCYTICANDIMMUNEFUNCTIONS*3URG2ES 
 3HAH/*$AR-!7ANI-!7ANI.!-ANAGEMENTOF-IRIZZISYNDROMEANEW
SURGICALAPPROACH!.:*3URG 
 3OTO*!9UCEL%+"ARISH-!#HUTAN2&ERRUCI*4-2CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
AFTERUNSUCCESSFULORINCOMPLETE%2#02ADIOLOGY 
 6ITALE'#3IOW9"AKER02#UCHIERRI!2EVERSIBLEBILEACIDCHANGESINBILEDUCT
OBSTRUCTIONANDITSPOTENTIALFORHEPATOCELULARINJURY*(EPATOL 
 9ASOJEMA %9 3OUZA %!#9OKOUAMA -9 #OLANGIOGRAlA PER POSPERATRIA NA
COLECISTECTOMIAVIDELAPAROSCPICA2EV0ARA-ED 

2ECEBIDOEM
!PROVADOEM

YQRMDQPDU