Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
The wake vortex development in the near eld and extended near eld behind a four engined large transport
aircraft model tted with an active winglet is presented. A detailed wind-tunnel investigation is conducted using a
half-model focusing on the high-lift case of a typical approach conguration at a Reynolds number of 0:5 106 based
on the wing mean aerodynamic chord and an angle of attack of 6.5 deg. The oweld is observed using advanced hotwire anemometry mainly focusing on the crossow plane at 5.6 spans downstream of the model. Based on the timedependent velocity components the wake oweld is analyzed by distributions of mean vorticity, turbulence
intensities, and spectral densities. Seven main vortical structures dominating the near-eld wing vortex sheet roll up
and merge to form the remaining trailing vortex in the extended near eld. By the use of oscillating winglet aps the
velocity uctuations at the core region of the remaining vortex are signicantly inuenced. Distinct narrowband
concentrations of turbulent kinetic energy can be found for the farthest downstream plane documenting the presence
of the disturbances generated by the winglet aps which may result in an amplication of inherent far-eld
instabilities. The frequencies at which these narrowband energy concentrations occur are, on the one hand,
dependent on the oscillation frequency of the winglet aps; on the other hand, there are also independent energy
concentrations within the frequency bands associated with wake instabilities.
w0
Nomenclature
AR
b
b0
b~0
=
=
=
=
CD
CL
Cm
c
f
fM
k
L
nB
Rec
rc
SNc;u0
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
SNu0
Tux , Tuy , =
Tuz
U1
u, v, w
w
v,
u,
u0 , v0 , w 0
=
=
=
=
=
aspect ratio
wing span, m
main vortex pair distance, m
distance between two adjacent vortices of a four
vortex system, m
drag coefcient
2 2
lift coefcient, 2LAR=U1
b
pitching moment coefcient
wing mean aerodynamic chord, m
frequency, Hz
sampling frequency, Hz
reduced frequency, fb=2U1
lift, N
number of band-averaging intervals
Reynolds number, U1 c=
vortex core radius, m
cross-spectral density of u0 normalized with
kU1 =u02 b=2
power spectral density of u0 normalized with
kU1 =u02 b=2
load factor, =4 0:7854 for an elliptic lift
distribution
axial,
turbulence intensity,
p lateral,
pvertical
02
02
=U1 , v =U1
pu
x
y , z
0
! x
Subscripts
Crouch
Crow
d
max, min
osc
w02 =U1
freestream velocity, m=s
axial, lateral, and vertical velocities, m=s
mean axial, lateral, and vertical velocities, m=s
uctuation part of u, v, and w, m=s
=
=
=
=
=
Crouch instability
Crow instability
dominant
maximum, minimum
oscillating
Introduction
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
176
Experimental Setup
The wind-tunnel facility C of the Institute of Aerodynamics at the
Technische Universitt Mnchen was used for this investigation
employing a detailed large transport aircraft conguration and
applying advanced hot-wire anemometry.
Wind Tunnel
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
177
wing tip lower side, Fig. 2, and has only a minor inuence on the
overall oweld and wake vortex evolution [32].
Measurement System and Test Conditions
178
0.4
0.2
WTV
9.8
WLV
18.8
A vortex wake can be divided into four main regions regarding the
downstream development: 1) the near eld, x=c 1, which is
characterized by the formation of highly concentrated vortices shed
at all surface discontinuities; 2) the extended near eld, x 10,
where the wake roll-up process takes place, and the merging of
dominant vortices (ap edge, wing tip) occurs, leading gradually to
two counter-rotating vortices; 3) the far eld, 10 x 100, where
the wake is descending in the atmosphere and linear instabilities
emerge; and 4) the decay region, x > 100, where fully developed
instabilities cause a strong interaction between the two trailing
vortices until they collapse. The results shown here are solely for the
near eld and extended near eld. The downstream stations are
marked by the nondimensional distance x and the nondimensional
characteristic time x 16CL =4 AR. The latter number
includes lift coefcient and aspect ratio to compare results of
different tests and congurations with reference to an elliptic lift
distribution. The owelds are presented as contour plots of
nondimensional axial vorticity ! x b=2U1 and vertical
turbulence intensity Tuz . The term ! x indicates the mean axial
vorticity component (dw=dy
dv=dz).
HTV
-55.4
IFV/WFV
-14.3
-0.2
ONV
36.1
OFV
55.9
INV
31.1
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
y*
a)
0.4
0.2
WLV
0.050
WTV
0.047
Baseline Conguration
z*
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
z*
IFV/WFV
0.030
-0.2
HTV
0.030
ONV
0.137
OFV
0.172
-0.4
INV
0.111
-0.6
-0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
y*
b)
Fig. 3 Contour plots of nondimensional axial vorticity () and
turbulence intensity (Tuz ) distributions at x 0:37; Rec 0:5 106 ;
a) ; solid lines: positive values, dashed lines: negative values;
10 50; 1; b) Tuz ; 0:02 Tuz 0:2; Tuz 0:01.
179
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
Main Vortex
(OFV/ONV/WTV)
30.1
z*
z*
INV
WLV
HT V
ON V- MV
-0.2
HTV x*=0.37
MV x*=5.6
ONV x*=0.02
-0.2
INV x*=0.02
WLV
1.3
-0.4
WLV x*=0.02
WLV x*=5.6
-0.4
INV x*=4.0
-0.6
HTV x*=5.6
HTV
-6.2
-0.8
-0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
y*
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
y*
Fig. 5 Positions of the vortices between x 0:02 and x 5:6;
Rec 0:5 106 .
a)
0.4
0.2
Main Vortex
(OFV/ONV/WTV)
0.146
z*
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
-0.6
-0.2
WLV
0.028
-0.4
-0.6
HTV
0.084
-0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
y*
b)
Fig. 4 Contour plots of nondimensional axial vorticity () and
turbulence intensity (Tuz ) distributions at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ;
a) ; solid lines: positive values, dashed lines: negative values;
10 50; 1; b) Tuz ; 0:02 Tuz 0:2; Tuz 0:01.
180
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
z*
z*
OFV/ONV/WTV
31.7
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-0.4
0.6
1.1
OFV/ONV/WTV
32.5
WLV
1.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.1
y*
y*
a)
b)
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
OFV/ONV/WTV
39.8
-0.1
-0.1
z*
z*
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
Wake Floweld
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.4
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.8
-0.4
0.6
1 .1
OFV/ONV/WTV
33.4
WLV
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.9
y*
y*
c)
d)
Fig. 6 Contour plots of nondimensional axial vorticity () distributions at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; 1 50; 1; a) symmetrical oscillation at
k 0:199; b) symmetrical oscillation at k 0:596; c) asymmetrical oscillation at k 0:199; d) asymmetrical oscillation at k 0:596.
181
0.2
0.2
0.1
OFV/ONV/WTV
0.199
OFV/ONV/WTV
0.174
-0.1
-0.1
z*
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
0.6
WLV
0.032
0.7
0.8
y*
0.9
1.1
0.9
1.1
y*
b)
a)
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
OFV/ONV/WTV
0.175
-0.1
-0.1
z*
z*
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
z*
0.1
-0.2
OFV/ONV/WTV
0.144
-0.2
WLV
0.026
-0.3
-0.4
-0.3
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-0.4
0.6
1.1
y*
0.7
0.8
y*
c)
d)
Fig. 7 Contour plots of turbulence intensity (Tuz ) distributions at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; 0:02 Tuz 0:2; Tuz 0:01; a) symmetrical oscillation
at k 0:199; b) symmetrical oscillation at k 0:596; c) asymmetrical oscillation at k 0:199; d) asymmetrical oscillation at k 0:596.
182
60
0.05
40
0.04
20
0.03
rc/b
max
-20
0.02
-40
Main Vortex
Symmetrical k =0.199
Symmetrical k =0.596
Asymmetrical k= 0.199
Asymmetrical k= 0.596
0.01
-80
3
x*
3
x*
b)
a)
0.4
0.2
Main Vortex
Symmetrical k=0.199
Symmetrical k=0.596
Asymmetrical k=0.199
Asymmetrical k=0.596
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.3
Tux, Tu y, Tu z
0.15
(U-u min)/ U
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
-60
3
x*
3
x*
c)
d)
Fig. 8 Development of oweld variables between x 1:0 and x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; a) max for the main vortex and the HTV; b) rc =b for the main
vortex; c) U1 u min =U1 for the main vortex; d) Tux;max , Tuy;max , and Tuz;max for the main vortex.
of oscillating aps. The data substantiate the fact that the oscillations
of the winglet aps can enhance vortex merging and lead to higher
rms levels in velocity perturbations at the core of the remaining
rolled-up vortex.
max
30.1
rc =b
0.034
Tux
0.050
Tuy
0.153
Tuz
0.146
47.3
42.4
46.4
44.0
0.024
0.028
0.025
0.025
0.114
0.126
0.126
0.157
0.044
0.044
0.044
0.042
0.179
0.165
0.135
0.144
0.153
0.150
0.150
0.147
31.7
32.5
39.8
33.4
0.031
0.028
0.031
0.029
0.043
0.029
0.036
0.037
0.043
0.048
0.047
0.046
0.169
0.193
0.184
0.170
0.199
0.174
0.175
0.144
183
10
10
10
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
100
Su
S u
100
10-1
10
-1
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
10-2
10-2
10
10
-3
10
-3
10
-1
10
10
-1
10
10
a)
a)
10
10
10
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
10
S u
10-1
10-1
10-2
10-2
10
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
100
100
S Nu
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
Spectral Analysis
-3
10
-1
10
10
k
b)
Fig. 9 Normalized power spectral densities of the axial velocity
uctuations at x 0:02; Rec 0:5 106 ; a) symmetrical oscillations;
b) asymmetrical oscillations.
10
-3
10
-1
10
10
b)
Fig. 10 Normalized power spectral densities of the axial velocity
uctuations at x 0:37; Rec 0:5 106 ; a) symmetrical oscillations;
b) asymmetrical oscillations.
184
10
10
10
k osc
S u
1.5
10-1
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
10
0.5
-3
10
-1
10
10
0.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
a)
10
10
a)
2
1.5
100
N
k osc
S u
10-1
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
10-2
10
0.5
-3
10
-1
10
10
0.5
b)
Fig. 11 Normalized power spectral densities of the axial velocity
uctuations at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; a) symmetrical oscillations;
b) asymmetrical oscillations.
1.5
b)
2
1.5
k osc
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
10-2
0.5
0.5
1.5
c)
Fig. 12 Relative difference of the power spectral densities for different
frequencies of symmetrical ap oscillations with reference to the baseline
conguration at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; isolines plotted for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
10, 15, 20; a) Su0 ; b) Sv0 ; c) Sw0 .
k osc
1.5
0.5
1.5
k
2.5
0.5
1.5
k
2.5
0.5
1.5
k
2.5
a)
2
k osc
1.5
0.5
b)
2
1.5
k osc
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
0.5
0.5
c)
Fig. 13 Relative difference of the power spectral densities for different
frequencies of asymmetrical ap oscillations with reference to the
baseline conguration at x 5:6; Rec 0:5 106 ; isolines plotted for 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20; a) Su0 ; b) Sv0 ; c) Sw0 .
185
186
360
102
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
270
Phase a ngle []
101
S c,u
100
10-1
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
315
225
180
135
90
-2
45
10
-3
10-1
100
101
k=0.099
k=0.199
k=0.497
k=0.994
k=1.987
101
100
N
10-1
-2
10
-3
10-1
100
101
102
10
a)
S c,u
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
10
100
10-1
101
b)
Fig. 14 Normalized cross-spectral densities of the amplitude of the
axial velocity uctuations for stations x1 0:02 and x2 5:6;
Rec 0:5 106 ; a) symmetrical oscillations; b) asymmetrical oscillations.
correlated with the second probe at station x2 5:6. The probes are
positioned in the core region of the WLV (x1 0:02) and the main
vortex (x2 5:6) at the same locations as taken for evaluation of the
power spectral densities shown in Figs. 9 and 11.
Normalized cross spectral densities SNc;u0 of the axial velocity
uctuations u0 are plotted against the reduced frequency k, Fig. 14.
The calculation of the cross-spectral densities is performed using the
same parameters as for the power spectral densities. Results are
shown again for symmetrical and asymmetrical winglet ap
oscillations. Distinct spectral peaks are clearly visible at reduced
frequencies corresponding to the oscillation frequencies and their
higher harmonics. The amplitudes of these peaks are comparably
high for both types of oscillations indicating the dominance of the
forced oscillations being convected from near-eld to extended neareld positions. Figure 15 contains the phase angle distributions of the
axial velocity uctuations as a function of the reduced frequency for
the asymmetrical oscillations. Phase angles at the values of the
reduced oscillation frequencies are within a band of 180 30 deg.
Conclusions
The wake vortex development of a large transport aircraft in
approach conguration tted with large winglet and oscillating
winglet aps is investigated by experimental means. A detailed four
engined half-model of 1:32 scale is studied at an angle of attack of
6.5 deg and a Reynolds number based on the mean aerodynamic
chord of 0:5 106 . Vorticity and turbulence intensity as well as
spectral density and cross-spectral density distributions are analyzed
in the near and extended near eld based on advanced hot-wire
anemometry. The winglet ap oscillations are aimed to introduce
desired perturbations in the wake oweld to promote and amplify
the development of inherent far-eld wake instabilities. It is shown
that the generated near-eld disturbances (at x 0) are still present
at the farthest downstream plane (at x 5:6). The oscillation
frequencies are chosen to match the frequency range of the wake
instabilities. The main results of this study can be summarized as
follows:
1) The wake near eld shows seven particular vortices, namely,
from outboard to inboard, the WLV, the WTV, the OFV, the ONV
and INV, the IFV/WFV, and the HTV. These vortices are connected
through the vortex sheet shed at the wing trailing edge, except for the
HTV. Positive axial vorticity is attributed to WLV, WTV, OFV,
ONV, and INV, whereas IFV/WFV and HTV show negative axial
vorticity. The latter is caused by the negative circulation gradient at
the wing-fuselage junction and the negative lift of the horizontal tail
plane needed for trimmed ight. The highest level of axial peak
vorticity is given by the OFV because of the highly loaded outboard
ap. It is located close to the free circulation centroid which is the
wake vortex roll-up center.
2) In the extended near eld the position and strength of the
particular vortices change progressively because of the wake roll-up
process and vortex merging. This process forms the remaining
rolled-up vortex to which most of the vorticity is fed up to 0:16.
The core regions of the particular wake vortices are characterized by
axial vorticity peaks and considerable axial velocity decits (8
11%). The vortex core structure exhibits maximum turbulence
intensities on the order of 520%.
3) Spectral analysis of the velocity uctuations shows a specic
narrowband concentration of turbulent kinetic energy in the core of
the rolled-up vortex, mainly at the frequencies of the winglet ap
oscillations. The velocity spectra show peak values at these
frequencies raising the perturbation level by a factor of 5 to 20
compared to the case of static ap deection or oscillation off. This
synchronous forcing can amplify the long wave Crow-type
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
Acknowledgment
The support of this investigation within the framework of IHK
Innovative High-Lift Congurations by the German Government,
Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, under contract
number 20A0301J is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Hnecke, K., Structure of a Transport Aircraft-Type Near Field
Wake, The Characterisation & Modication of Wakes from Lifting
Vehicles in Fluids, CP-584, AGARD, May 1996, pp. 5-15-9.
[2] Brenner, F., Air Trafc Control Procedures for the Avoidance of Wake
Vortex Encounters: Today and Future Developments by Deutsche
Flugsicherung GmbH, The Characterisation & Modication of Wakes
from Lifting Vehicles in Fluids, CP-584, AGARD, May 1996, pp. 4-1
4-14.
[3] Gerz, T., Wake Vortex Prediction and Observation: Towards an
Operational System, Proceedings of ODAS 2001, S1-3, ONERA-DLR
Aerospace Symposium, ONERA, Chatillon, France, June 2001,
ISBN 2-7257-006-X.
[4] Betz, A., Das Verhalten von Wirbelsystemen, Zeitschrift fr
Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1932, pp. 164
174.
doi:10.1002/zamm.19320120307
[5] Donaldson, C. P., and Bilanin, A. J., Vortex Wakes of Conventional
Aircraft, AGARDograph, No. 204, May 1975.
[6] Devenport, W. J., Rife, M. C., Liapis, S. I., and Follin, G. J., The
Structure and Development of a Wing-Tip Vortex, Journal of Fluid
Mechanics, Vol. 312, 1996, pp. 67106.
doi:10.1017/S0022112096001929
[7] Spalart, P. R., Airplane Trailing Vortices, Annual Review of Fluid
Mechanics, Vol. 30, 1998, pp. 107138.
doi:10.1146/annurev.uid.30.1.107
[8] Rossow, V. J., Lift-Generated Vortex Wakes of Subsonic Transport
Aircraft, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1999,
pp. 507560.
doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(99)00006-8
[9] Hnecke, K., From Formation to DecayExtended-Time Wake
Vortex Characteristics of Transport-Type Aircraft, AIAA Paper 20023265, June 2002.
[10] Henke, R., Validation of Wing Technologies on an Airbus A340
Flying Testbed: First Flight Test Results from the European Program
AWIATOR, International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences
(ICAS) Paper 2004-4.4.1, Sept. 2004.
[11] Coustols, E., Stumpf, E., Jacquin, L., Moens, F., Vollmers, H., and
Gerz, T., Minimised Wake: A Collaborative Research Programme on
Aircraft Wake Vortices, AIAA Paper 2003-0938, Jan. 2003.
[12] Gerz, T., Holzpfel, F., and Darracq, D., Commercial Aircraft Wake
Vortices, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2002,
pp. 181208.
doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00004-0
[13] Kpp, F., Rahm, S., Smalikho, I., Dol, A., Cariou, J.-P., Harris, M.,
and Young, R. I., Comparison of Wake-Vortex Parameters Measured
by Pulsed and Continuous-Wave Lidars, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 42,
No. 4, 2005, pp. 916923.
doi:10.2514/1.8177
187
188
Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on January 3, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.37307
[35] Crouch, J. D., Instability and Transient Growth for Two TrailingVortex Pairs, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 350, 1997, pp. 311
330.
doi:10.1017/S0022112097007040
[36] Breitsamter, C., Nachlaufwirbelsysteme groer Transportugzeuge
Experimentelle Charakterisierung und Beeinussung. Habilitationsschrift, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Herbert Utz Verlag
(Aerodynamik), Germany (ISBN 3-8316-0713-3), Feb. 2007.