Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Large diameter rock-socketed bored piles are
commonly used as foundations for multi-storey
buildings in India. Although considerable attention
has been given to the design of rock-socketed piles
in past decades (Carter and Kulhawy, 1988; Cole
and Stroud 1977; Horvath and Kenny 1979;
Rosenberg and Journeaux 1976; Rowe and
Armitage 1987; Williams et al. 1981; Zhang and
Einstein, 1998; for both rough and smooth socket),
the current design procedure is still highly
empirical. In general, research on the shaft friction
and end bearing of piles in rocks lags considerably
behind that of piles in soils. Limited information is
available on the load transfer characteristics of
rock-socketed piles and very little, if any,
published data has been reported on the behaviour
of such piles in service.
Till recent time, it was usual to adopt allowable
bearing pressure of 3.0MPa for sound rocks like
basalt, and 2.5MPa for weaker rocks like volcanic
Breccia and Tuff. During installation, criterion
based on chiselling energy (Datye, 1990) is being
practiced for pile termination in weathered rocks.
These practices appear to be very conservative as
they neglect, or assume very low values of the side
Page 1 of 8
R2
R3
R4
Description
Straight,
smooth-sided
socket,
grooves
or
indentations less than 1 mm
deep.
Grooves of depth 1-4 mm,
width greater than 2 mm, at
spacing 50 mm to 200 mm.
Grooves of depth 4-10 mm,
width greater than 5 mm, at
spacing 50 mm to 200 mm.
Grooves or undulations of
depth > 10 mm, width > 10
mm at spacing 50 mm to
200 mm.
Page 2 of 8
Estimation of ultimate socket friction capacity for micro piles in rock strata
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.1
10
100
Page 3 of 8
increment
and
corresponding
settlement
observation continue till the model pile fails by
loss of friction. Based on observed failure load,
coefficient of unit side resistance is computed for
model pile and summarized in the Table 3.
P
Concrete Specimen
Rock
Soft Material
Estimation of ultimate socket friction capacity for micro piles in rock strata
Rock Type
Hard
Soft
Hard +
Soft
Avg. UCS
Value
(MPa)
72-150
30-84
30-150
Equations
fsu = 0.22qu-0.5
fsu = 1.12qu-0.5
fsu =130.66 qu1.847
Page 6 of 8
Estimation of ultimate socket friction capacity for micro piles in rock strata
Table 3 Estimated and observed coefficient of uniform side resistance for rock plug specimens
Socket
Observed
Unit Side
Unit Side
length
Ultimate
Resistance
Resistance
(mm)
load (kg)
(MPa)
Coefficient
52
104
13200
7.77
0.216
40
52
130
13200
6.21
36
52
104
13200
39.6
52
130
47
52
30
Rock
UCS
of
rock
(MPa)
Socket
Dia
(mm)
36
Horvath
ZA1998
ZA 1998
Smooth
Rough
Sockets
Sockets
IRC
78
:2000
RA1987
0.08
0.037
0.075
0.041
0.062
0.067
0.155
0.075
0.035
0.071
0.039
0.059
7.77
0.213
0.08
0.037
0.075
0.041
13200
6.21
0.157
0.078
0.035
0.071
104
13200
7.77
0.165
0.07
0.032
52
130
13200
6.21
0.207
0.095
32.4
52
130
13200
6.21
0.192
43.2
52
104
13200
7.77
43.2
52
156
12900
104.3
52
130
7500
72
52
104
140
52
156
148
52
84
50
70
52
130
1300
0.612
0.009
0.05 0.027 0.054
0.03
0.045
0.048
0.096
0.08 0.075
A - Gritty Sandstone; B- Cilious & Argillaceous Sandstone; C - Ferruginous & Argillaceous Sandstone; D - Argillaceous Sandstone; E Ortho
Quartzite
Sandstone; F - dark greyish black colour fine grained porphyritic Basalt. G - Fresh pinkish red colour ferrogenous Sandstone RA Rowand Armitage;
RJ
Rosenberg and Journeaux; ZA Zang and Einstein; HK Horvath and Kenney; CK Carter and Kulhawy
Type
IS:
14593
et al. 1980
RJ 1976
HK 1979
CK 1988
0.133
0.111
0.105
0.063
0.126
0.106
0.099
0.062
0.067
0.133
0.111
0.105
0.039
0.059
0.064
0.127
0.106
0.1
0.065
0.036
0.054
0.058
0.116
0.097
0.091
0.041
0.082
0.045
0.068
0.073
0.146
0.122
0.115
0.09
0.039
0.079
0.044
0.065
0.07
0.14
0.118
0.11
0.179
0.072
0.034
0.068
0.038
0.057
0.06
0.121
0.102
0.096
5.06
0.117
0.072
0.034
0.068
0.038
0.057
0.06
0.121
0.102
0.096
3.53
0.034
0.05
0.022
0.044
0.024
0.036
0.039
0.078
0.065
0.061
2400
1.41
0.019
0.06
0.026
0.053
0.029
0.044
0.047
0.094
0.078
0.074
6888
2.703
0.019
0.01
0.019
0.038
0.021
0.032
0.034
0.068
0.057
0.053
130
6750
3.178
0.021
0.01
0.018
0.037
0.021
0.031
0.033
0.066
0.055
0.052
52
104
1500
0.883
0.011
0.04
0.025
0.049
0.027
0.041
0.044
0.087
0.073
0.069
52
130
7500
0.353
0.007
0.08
0.032
0.064
0.035
0.053
0.057
0.113
0.095
0.089
Page 7 of 8
TABLE 4 Observed and Predicted Coefficient of Side Resistance () (Box Shear Test)
Without Roughness
Porphyritic
Basalt
Ferruginous
Sandstone
150
52
1800
50.32
52
2520
2.85
2.7
3.6
2.04
1.8
1.8
4.8
3.75
1.8
2.52
0.019
0.018
0.024
0.041
0.036
0.036
0.083
0.066
0.052
0.012
0.05
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Estimation of coefficient of unit side resistance using bored pile analogy
0.018
0.037
0.02
0.0184
0.037
0.02
0.0184
0.037
0.02
0.032
0.063
0.035
0.032
0.063
0.035
0.032
0.063
0.035
0.0264
0.053
0.029
0.0264
0.053
0.029
0.0264
0.053
0.029
0.0184
0.037
0.02
0.032
0.063
0.035
0.031
0.031
0.031
0.053
0.053
0.053
0.044
0.044
0.044
0.031
0.053
0.033
0.033
0.033
0.056
0.056
0.056
0.047
0.047
0.047
0.033
0.056
0.065
0.055
0.051
0.065
0.055
0.051
0.065
0.055
0.051
0.113
0.094
0.088
0.113
0.094
0.088
0.113
0.094
0.088
0.094
0.079
0.074
0.094
0.079
0.074
0.094
0.079
0.074
0.065
0.055
0.051
0.113
0.094
0.088
Page 8 of 8