Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
)
)
)
Pro Se Petitioner,
)
) Case No. 06C14067023
v.
)
)
WILLIAM M. SCHMALFELDT
)
6636 Washington Blvd. #71
)
Elkridge, MD 21075
)
)
Pro Se Respondent.
)
__________________________________ )
RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS
PETITION FOR CONTEMPT
Now comes Respondent William M. Schmalfeldt (SCHMALFELDT)
with this Motion to Dismiss the petition for contempt fled by William John
Joseph Hoge III (HOGE)
HOGE asks this honorable court to find SCHMALFELDT in
contempt of this courts Peace Order dated August 27, 2014, claiming
SCHMALFELDT violated the no contact portion of the order by posting a
blog entry containing a link to HOGEs blog. This link caused the blogging
platform WordPress to automatically (and without SCHMALFELDTs
knowledge or active consent) send HOGE an e-mail notification that
1!
1.
2.
3.
HOGE uses the peace order for purposes for which it was never
intended.
4.
5.
6.
2!
7.
8.
That HOGEs main purpose for this action as well as the 367
criminal charges filed against SCHMALFELDT and the
previous peace order and the recent Copyright Infringement
case in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
(Case No. 1:14-ELH-01683) had nothing whatsoever to do with
an ongoing search for justice and everything to do with an
ongoing attempt to use SCHMALFELDTs Parkinsons disease
to cause his early death or total incapacitation by keeping him
under a constant state of stress and forcing him to venture
outside in winter weather, which in and of itself is a dangerous,
life-threatening endeavor for SCHMALFELDT.
ARGUMENTS
I.
3!
had committed 367 (three hundred sixty seven) crimes, mostly for violations
of the peace order. The Carroll County States Attorney deemed each charge
nolle prosequi. (Carroll County District Court Cases 0S00058205, (1 count
each, Harassment as a Course of Conduct, Electronic Mail Harassment,
Illegal Access to a Computer); 06C1306335 (1 count, Harassment as a
course of conduct); 2S00058501 (1 count, Harassment as a course of
conduct); 5S00058427 (1 count, Failure to comply with peace order
[FTCWPO]); 3S00059643 (5 counts, FTCWPO); 6S00059086 (3 counts,
FTCWPO); 4S00060729 (1 count, each, Harassment as a course of conduct,
Electronic mail harassment, 36 counts of FTCWPO); 3S00060735 (198 [one
hundred ninety eight] counts of FTCWPO); 0S00060886 (88 [eighty eight]
counts of FTCWPO); and 1S00060635 (29 counts of FTCWPO). Each and
every charge was deemed nolle prosequi by the Carroll County States
Attorneys office. As the weeks and months went on, HOGEs allegations of
SCHMALFELDTs violation of the peace order got more and more bizarre.
(The illegal access to a computer charge arose from a HOGE fantasy
in which SCHMALFELDT somehow gained control of a computer server in
Kansas City, and using the Internet Provider Number (IP Number) of a
religious organization in Brazil, used that server to send harassing
4!
messages to HOGE on the same day Super Storm Sandy was ravaging the
East Coast.
Other HOGE fantasies included the belief that the words Beware the
Ides of March uttered by SCHMALFELDT in reference to a Deputy
District Attorney in Los Angeles County, California, on a Blog Talk Radio
Show in which SCHMALFELDT was making a sly reference to a story he
knew to be coming out in the Boston Phoenix on March 15 that would cast
this person in an unfavorable light, constituted a direct death threat to
HOGE.
HOGE has stated on numerous occasions that SCHMALFELDT is
perfectly free to write about him. But he is not free to write TO him if he
doesnt wish to be contacted by SCHMALFELDT. Unfortunately, in his
three year campaign to destroy SCHMALFELDT, far too often HOGE has
conflated the words about and to in his numerous complaints against
SCHMALFELDT. In fact, using HOGEs own words, his first peace order
was not about content sent to him. It was what SCHMALFELDT wrote
about him.
(Screen capture [emphasis added] from
http://hogewash.com/2013/06/14/my-side-part-2/)
5!
6!
Here, again, HOGE puts the English language on the water board and
tortures it to fit his purposes. The offending blog post was intended for
everyone who read the Breitbart Unmasked blog. It was not intended as a
personal message to HOGE. The art of rhetoric in editorial writing has long
been understood to be protected by the First Amendment. It was not a letter
sent to HOGEs home. It was not an e-mail sent to HOGEs inbox. It was a
blog post, read by everyone who read that particular online edition of the
news magazine Breitbart Unmasked. If it had been printed out, placed into
an envelope and mailed to HOGEs address, that would constitute contact.
In further charges against SCHMALFELDT, Hoge charged
SCHMALFELDT with using hashtag mentions on Twitter (#wjjhoge)
which do not alert the person being referred to that hes been referred to,
On July 9, 2013, not even one month after receiving his first Peace
Order, HOGE attempted to follow SCHMALFELDTs Twitter account,
which would ensure that HOGE received each and every word
SCHMALFELDT wrote on his Twitter account. So much for being
alarmed, frightened and annoyed by SCHMALFELDTs tweets.
(Screen capture from http://hogewash.com/2013/07/10/follower-no394/)
7!
8!
9!
10!
11!
denied twice in the District Court, he lied to this honorable court when he
alleged that he was being harassed by SCHMALFELDT over Twitter. When
asked why he didnt take the 3-second action of blocking SCHMALFELDT
on Twitter, which would ensure he would never see SCHMALFELDTs
tweets ever again, HOGE told this court that blocking SCHMALFELDT
would be the same as disabling a significant portion of his Internet
functionality and would be the same as having to change his telephone
number to avoid telemarketers.
HOGE lied by telling this court through his signed peace order
petition that SCHMALFELDTs tweets put him in fear of his life and
personal safety. He checked the yes box when asked if he felt
SCHMALFELDT was causing him substantial fear of death or physical
12!
13!
III.
from the violent actions of others, and from harassing phone calls, letters, emails and other direct contact that could alarm or frighten a person. HOGE
is neither alarmed by nor frightened by SCHMALFELDT. He has gained
this peace order and the one before it for one reason to use it as a cudgel
against SCHMALFELDT.
SCHMALFELDT maintains that he would happily live out the rest of
his Parkinsons disease-shortened existence never seeing HOGE or hearing
or seeing his name again. SCHMALFELDT doesnt require a peace order to
stay away from or cease contact with HOGE. SCHMALFELDT is, in fact,
disgusted by HOGE and his followers and their repeated suggestions that he
end his own life.
When SCHMALFELDT ignores HOGE, something always happens
to draw SCHMALFELDTs attention back to HOGE. The copyright
infringement suit is an example. After the suit, SCHMALFELDT resumed
ignoring HOGE, only to receive a Tupperware container filled with wet
horse feces from an unnamed person. On Nov. 30, 2014, HOGE wrote the
following on his blog.
14!
I believe that the readers of this blog find the story of how the
Cabin Boy is reacting to a tasteless, but exquisitely appropriate, prank to
be newsworthy. Therefore, Hogewash! will continue to provide news and
commentary on the matter.
15!
16!
to go to the mailbox himself lives in fear every time his wife gets in the car
to drive down to the mailbox.
HOGE did not obtain a peace order for the purposes for which it was
intended. HOGE obtained the peace order to give him leave to harass
SCHMALFELDT without affording SCHMALFELDT a legal recourse to
respond. That is unfair and this court should take actions to ensure that this
sort of behavior is halted.
IV.
SCHMALFELDT about his intentions with the Peace Order appeal. Had
SCHMALFELDT been informed that HOGE had changed his mind,
SCHMALFELDT would have attended the August 27 hearing and
vigorously defended himself, including asking the honorable court to rule on
his motion that the petition be dismissed. HOGE stole that opportunity from
SCHMALFELDT, and that action should shock the sensibilities of this court
and, at the very least, lead to a rehearing or a reversal of the peace order.
V.
17!
18!
honorable judge explain that he had no idea what the Twitter was for or
how it was used. His honor explained that his knowledge of computerrelated issues was very limited. Yet, he completely disregarded
SCHMALFELDTs explanations, backed by evidence provided by experts at
Twitter that supported SCHMALFELDTs contention that HOGE was
wasting taxpayer money and interfering with SCHMALFELDTs first
amendment rights when a simple 3-second action on HOGEs part could
have blocked SCHMALFELDT from his computer for all time.
The honorable judge set aside the ruling of the US District Court for
the District of Maryland in the case of US v. Cassidy (Criminal Case No.
RWT 11-091) that found:
harassing telephone calls are targeted towards a particular victim
and are received outside a public forum. United States v. Bowker, 372 F.3d
365, 379 (6th Cir. 2004). Twitter and Blogs are todays equivalent of a
bulletin board that one is free to disregard, in contrast, for example, to emails or phone calls directed to a victim. (See id. at 378)
!
19!
20!
21!
fact that SCHMALFELDT did not send the e-mail or post the comment on
HOGEs blog.
SCHMALFELDT has since learned that he could have disabled his
blogs ping back functionality. This would be unfair to everyone else
mentioned by hyperlink in SCHMALFELDTs WordPress blog. Nobody
would ever be notified that SCHMALFELDT had referred to his or her blog
in his blog postings. There is no way to selectively refrain from sending a
pingback to a certain blog, just like there is no way for Channel 11 to
broadcast its signal to everybodys house but HOGEs. If SCHMALFELDT
were to block his ping back functionality for one and all, if he ever resumed
his blogs ping back function, the software would search through previous
blog posts, find the mention of HOGEs blog, and notify HOGE of the
pingback.
Regarding the posting of the comment on HOGEs blog, that is
entirely HOGEs doing. At the bottom of the email automatically sent by
WordPress to notify HOGE that his blog had been pinged, he is given the
choice of accepting or rejecting the ping back.
HOGE took the affirmative action to accept the ping back, believing
this was the opportunity he was waiting for. The weeks of sitting by the
mouse hole waiting for the mouse to stick out a whisker had paid off. So
22!
terribly frightened, alarmed and annoyed was HOGE by this innocent action
of the automatic, default workings of the WordPress algorithm, he decided
he had to spend more of Carroll Countys money and use more of this
courts valuable time and once more risk SCHMALFELDTs life and/or
health by dragging him back out into the cold weather on Jan. 30, to cause
him the physical pain of having to sit upright on courtroom benches when
even sitting in his recliner become more uncomfortable as weeks go by. This
is of no import to HOGE. A law has been broken in his mind, and he has yet
another chance to punish SCHMALFELDT.
Like he did in December 2013, SCHMALFELDT advises the court
that HOGE will not be satisfied with a finding of contempt. If this honorable
court decides SCHMALFELDT should pay the $1,000 fine and spend 90
days in jail (which SCHMALFELDT honestly feels, given his present
condition, he would not survive), once these measures have expired, HOGE
will look for other ways to harass SCHMALFELDT, to worsen the stress in
his life, to cause him pain and hasten the day of his total incapacity or death.
Now that HOGE cant get a states attorney to give him the time of
day, he is using this honorable court as an end run to get around the states
attorney and he will continue to misuse and abuse this court and any court
23!
that will listen to him in his baffling quest to cause harm to, injure, or
indirectly kill SCHMALFELDT.
THEREFORE, William M. Schmalfeldt, Sr., asks this court to
dismiss HOGEs petition for contempt with prejudice.
FURTHERMORE, if it is in the courts power to do so,
SCHMALFELDT asks this court to sanction HOGE for this latest attempt to
use the courts as his personal whipping post. If this court has the power to do
so, SCHMALFELDT asks that the honorable court consider HOGEs
duplicity in robbing SCHMALFELDT of the opportunity to defend himself
and either set aside its previous decision or rehear the motion for a peace
order, or otherwise declare the peace order invalid.
FURTHERMORE, if it is in the courts power to do so,
SCHMALFELDT respectfully asks this court to ORDER HOGE to refrain
from filing further legal actions against SCHMALFELDT without the
courts permission.
FURTHERMORE, SCHMALFELDT asks that HOGE be ordered to
pay all costs associated with this misbegotten adventure.
24!
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
William M. Schmalfeldt, Pro Se
6636 Washington Blvd. Lot 71
Elkridge, MD 21075
410-206-9637
bschmalfeldt@comcast.net
Verification
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief and all copies are true and correct
representations of the original documents.
William M. Schmalfeldt
Certificate of Service
I certify that on the 9th day of January 2015, I served a copy of the
foregoing Motion to Dismiss WJJ Hoge IIIs Petition for Contempt by First
Class Mail to W.J.J. Hoge, 20 Ridge Road, Westminster, MD 21157,
Certified, Return Receipt Requested.
William M. Schmalfeldt
25!
INDEX!OF!EXHIBITS!
!
EXHIBIT!A!!Proof!of!WJJ!Hoge!III!lies,!to!his!
readers!and!under!oath!to!the!court.!
!
EXHIBIT!B!!Hoge!demands!hyperlinks!when!
referring!to!his!blog.!
!
EXHIBIT!C!!Carroll!County!District!Court!Denies!
Hoges!Peace!Order!Petition!
!
EXHIBIT!D!!WordPress!states!that!ping!backs!
are!the!default,!automatic!function!of!a!WordPress!
blog!when!a!hyperlink!is!used.!
!
EXHIBIT!E!!Various!technical!blog!posts!backing!
what!WordPress!says!in!Exhibit!D.!
!
EXHIBIT!F!!Proof!that!Hoge!posted!the!ping!back!
comment!of!his!own!will.!
!
EXHIBIT!G!!Hoges!readers!and!supporters!egg!
him!on!to!put!Schmalfeldt!in!jail.!
!
EXHIBIT!H!!Schmalfeldts!ignored!motion!to!
dismiss!Hoges!peace!order!petition.!
!
26!
EXHIBIT'A'
!
!
!
!
HOGE!LIES,!ON!HIS!BLOG!TO!HIS!
READERS,!AND!TO!THE!COURT!UNDER!
PENALTY!OF!PERJURY!
27!
From!Hoges!initial!peace!order!petition,!swearing!under!penalty!of!perjury!that!my!
tweets!put!him!in!fear!of!his!life!and!personal!safety.!
!
!
!
Another!Hoge!Lie!under!penalty!of!perjury.!I!am!not!bragging!about!being!a!scofflaw.!
Im!mocking!and!marveling!at!the!fact!that!Hoge!would!file!criminal!charges!against!
someone!for!responding!to!a!Tweet!without!removing!Hoges!Twitter!handle.!This!is!
from!Hoges!application!for!charges!from!August!2013.!
!
!
This!is!a!lie,!one!of!many,!that!Hoge!told!to!his!readers.!
28!
!
http://hogewash.com/2014/08/27/inbrebabpeaceborder/!
29!
EXHIBIT'B'
!
SECTIONS'FROM'HOGES'MOTION'IN'
OPPOSITION'TO'DEFENDANTS'
MOTION'FOR'SUMMARY'JUDGMENT'IN'
WHICH'HE'DEMANDS'THAT'A'
HYPERLINK'TO'HIS'SITE'IS'A'
REQUIREMENT'FOR'THE'USE'OF'
MATERIAL'FROM'HIS'BLOG.'
'
30!
'
'
'
******
'
'
!
31!
'
'
32!
EXHIBIT'C'
!
!
!
!
!
ORDER!OF!CARROLL!COUNTY!DISTRICT!
COURT!DENYING!HOGES!PETITION!FOR!A!
PEACE!ORDER!AGAINST!SCHMALFELDT.!
33!
34!
EXHIBIT'D'
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
DIRECT!COMMUNICATION!TO!
SCHMALFELDT!FROM!AUTOMATTIC,!
INC.,!THE!SAN!FRANCISCO!COMPANY!
THAT!CREATED!WORDPRESS,!
SIGNIFYING!THAT!PING!BACKS!ARE!AN!
AUTOMATIC,!DEFAULT!FUNCTIONING!OF!
WORDPRESS,!AND!ARE!NOT!
CONSCIOUSLY!SENT!BY!THE!BLOGGER.!
!
!
35!
36!
37!
EXHIBIT'E'
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
VARIOUS!TECHNICAL!BLOG!POSTS!
DEMONSTRATING!THAT!PING!BACKS!
ARE!AN!AUTOMATIC!FUNCTION!OF!
WORDPRESS!AND!THAT!PING!BACK!
MESSAGES!ARE!SENT!AUTOMATICALLY,!
NOT!BY!THE!INDIVIDUAL!BLOGGER.!
38!
!
!
!
!
!
!
39!
40!
41!
42!
43!
44!
45!
46!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
EXHIBIT'F'
PROOF'THAT'THE'PING'BACK'ONLY'
SHOWED'UP'ON'HOGES'BLOG'
BECAUSE'HE'APPROVED'IT.'THIS'WAS'
HIS'DOING,'NOT'SCHMALFELDTS'
'
47!
'
'
He'approved'it.'
'
http://hogewash.com/2014/11/08/th
eUdreadfulUproUseUschmalfeldt/'
'
This'is'what'appeared'on'his'blog.'
!
48!
'
EXHIBIT'G'
!
!
!
!
HOGES!READERS,!SUPPORTERS!EGGING!
HIM!ON!IN!HIS!EFFORT!TO!FINALLY!PUT!
SCHMALFELDT!BEHIND!BARS!
!
49!
!
http://kimberlinunmask.com/files/categorybbillbschmalfeldt.php!
!
!
!
50!
51!
!
HOGE!AS!CAESAR!OR!OBI!WAN!FROM!STAR!WARS!IS!A!COMMON!MEME!AMONG!
HIS!SUPPORTERS.!
!
THE!FOLLOWING!ARE!ALL!COMMENTS!FROM!A!SINGLE!BLOG!POST!ON!
HOGEWASH,!http://hogewash.com/2014/12/22/howbpingbacksbwork/!
!
52!
53!
54!
55!
56!
57!
58!
59!
60!
61!
62!
63!
64!
65!
66!
67!
68!
69!
!
!
70!
EXHIBIT H
SCHMALFELDTs MOTION TO DISMISS HOGES APPEAL OF
THE CARROLL COUNTY DISTRICT COURTs DENIAL OF HIS
PEACE ORDER PETITION, OF WHICH SCHMALFELDT NEVER
HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
AS A RESULT OF HOGEs DUPLICITY IN TELLING
SCHMALFELDT HE WOULD NOT PURSUE THE APPEAL, THEN
GOING TO COURT AND GETTING HIS PEACE ORDER
UNOPPOSED.
!
!
71!
72!
On the same day, the Petitioner filed an appeal of the District Courts
decision.
On August 6, 2014, the Circuit Court for Carroll County, Maryland,
docketed the instant case for a de novo appeal hearing on August 27, 2014.
Given the fact that the Respondent lives in Howard County,
Maryland, and the Petitioner lives in Carroll County, Maryland, the
Petitioner still finds himself unable to provide a statutory base for relief,
according to Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings 6201(a).
Subject to the provisions of 6202 and 6203 of this subtitle
and unless otherwise provided by law, a civil action shall be
brought in a county where the defendant resides, carries on a
regular business, is employed, or habitually engages in a vocation.
In addition, a corporation also may be sued where it maintains its
principal offices in the State. (Id.)
Respondent resides and is retired, living in Howard County,
Maryland.
Petitioner is engaged in a vexatious copyright infringement case
against Respondent in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
(Northern Division), Case No. 1:14-CV-01683-ELH, and this action before
the Circuit Court for Carroll County arose from the fact that Respondent sent
message to Petitioner regarding the Copyright Infringement case in a lawful,
peaceful fashion. This attempt to get yet another Peace Order against the
respondent is just one more attempt by this petitioner in his nearly two year
!
73!
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
William M. Schmalfeldt, Pro Se
6636 Washington Blvd. Lot 71
Elkridge, MD 21075
410-206-9637
bschmalfeldt@comcast.net
Verification
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief and all copies are true and correct
representations of the original documents.
William M. Schmalfeldt
!
74!
Certificate of Service
I certify that on the 7th day of August, 2014, I served a copy of the
foregoing Motion to Dismiss Petitioners Appeal by First Class Mail to
W.J.J.Hoge, 20 Ridge Road, Westminster, MD 21157, Certified, Return
Receipt Requested.
William M. Schmalfeldt
!!
75!