Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laura M. Pigozzi
Brian N. Larson
MLA: January 10, 2015
Agenda
Introduction
Methods and findings of study
Universal design in technical and professional
communication classroom
Contact info:
Pigozzi = pigoz002@umn.edu
Larson = larson@Rhetoricked.com @Rhetoricked
Slides and handout at www.Rhetoricked.com
Introduction
Funding from internal grant
Writing for International
Students (WINS)
Avoiding deficiency paradigm
No presumption: NNSinternational
student
Methods: Questions
Why students took these courses
Genres they expected to learn
Feedback students wanted/got from
instructors
Whether they had difficulties (and which)
Satisfaction with class
Things that would improve the class
Findings: No significant
differences, except . . .
OL1
Students
(n=20)
EL1
Students
(n=134)
X
(p<0.05)
55%
28%
5.85
50%
21%
7.68
45%
12%
12.64
65%
36%
5.93
Universal Design
Universal Design
all possible barriers for all possible students
Harrison, 2006, p. 154
Framework
Delivery of information to students
Supporting students in their studying
Assignment design and assessment
Online Instruction
Provide multiple means of
representation
Provide multiple means of action and
expression
Provide multiple means of engagement
Oswal & Meloncon, 2014, pp. 288-289
Not a panacea
Individual students will still need
individualized attention.
There may be barriers to
implementation.
Negative perceptions by instructors.
Thank you!
Pigozzi
Pigoz002@umn.edu
Larson
larson@rhetoricked.com @Rhetoricked