Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journalof
Fatigue
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfatigue
a
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheeld, Mappin Street, Sheeld S1 1JD, United Kingdom
Structural Materials and Integrity Research Centre, Materials and Engineering Research Institute (MERI), Sheeld Hallam University,
City Campus, Howard Street, Sheeld S1 1WB, United Kingdom
c
Metal Improvement Company, Newsbury, Berkshire RG14 5TU, United Kingdom
d
Airbus UK, Chester Road, Broughton, Chester CH4 0DR, United Kingdom
Received 5 April 2006; received in revised form 18 September 2006; accepted 16 October 2006
Available online 29 December 2006
Abstract
The work examines the microstructural and fatigue properties of friction stir welds made of 2024-T3 aluminium alloy and provides
extensive information towards their cyclic stressstrain behaviour, residual stress distribution and crack initiation sites. To eliminate the
cost associated with the removal of the ow arm by milling and other costs associated with the quality control of the welding process
(residual stress distribution, micro-hardness prole, welding scar, etc.), controlled shot peening is introduced. Tensile residual stresses
introduced in the thermomechanical aected zone during welding are found to become compressive after peening. The eect can be held
responsible for increasing the fatigue resistance of the weld beyond the values of the bare (parent) material.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Friction-stir welding; Controlled shot peening; Residual stresses; Fatigue life; Cyclic yield stress; Rening of precipitates
1. Introduction
Commercial transport airplanes generally consist of a
built-up structure where the skin-to-stringer, skin-to-clip
and clip-frame joints are riveted, bolted or bonded. Such
joints for many years have been the subject of extensive
research, especially in terms of multiple site damage, widespread damage, fretting fatigue, etc. The proceedings of the
International Conference of Aeronautical Fatigue provide
an excellent source for referencing.
Friction stir welding (FSW) is a relatively new process
patented by The Welding Institute (Cambridge, UK) in
1992 [1]. A friction stir butt weld is produced by plunging
a rotating tool into the facing surfaces of the two plates.
The tool consists of a shoulder and a proled pin emerging
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 114 2254 257; fax: +44 114 2253501.
E-mail address: C.Rodopoulos@shu.ac.uk (C.A. Rodopoulos).
0142-1123/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.032
from it. As the rotating pin moves along the weld line, the
material is heated up by the friction generated by the shoulder and stirred by the rotating pin in a process similar to an
extrusion. Since the temperatures are well below the melting point, problems associated with the liquid/solid phase
transformation are avoided.
Besides the attractive mechanical properties, especially
in fatigue and load bearing capacity strength, FSW integral
structures are claimed to oer cost and weight savings [2,3].
Therefore, FSW was recently identied by leading aircraft
manufacturers as key technology for fuselage and wing
manufacturing [4,5]. Yet, problems associated with the fatigue behaviour of FSW are numerous and not well
established.
Generally FSW produces ve distinct microstructural
zones [6], namely the weld nugget (N), the shoulder contact
zone or ow arm region, the thermomechanical aected
zone (TMAZ), the heat aected zone (HAZ) and unaected
zone or parent plate (PP). Consequently, the fatigue
1532
Table 1
Chemical composition of 2024-T351 in wt% based on EDX measurements
Alloy
2024-T351
Minimum
Maximum
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Zn
Ti
Zr
Al
0.50
0.50
3.8
4.9
0.30
0.90
1.2
1.8
0.10
0.25
0.15
Balance
Table 2
Basic mechanical properties of 2024-T351 according to ASTM E8m-94a
Mechanical properties
Mean
Standard deviation
Standard error
347.4
484.6
15.0
135.5
70.5
5.13
2.6
0.2
8.7
0.6
4.6
2.3
0.2
3.00
0.6
1.5
0.8
0.1
1.5
0.2
Fig. 1. Grain structure distribution exhibited within the ve zones. (a) Flow arm; (b) nugget; (c) TMAZ; (d) HAZ; and (e) parent.
near surface region and surface roughening [2629]. Residual stresses are likely to benet the fatigue resistance of
high strength materials. Softer materials on the other hand
are likely to experience fatigue resistance improvement
owning mostly to strain hardening, since partial or even
complete relaxation of the residual stresses may occur
depending on the type of loading, stress level and the residual stress distribution prole [3032]. Strain hardening is
likely to increase the ow resistance of the material to plastic deformation.
Roughening of the surface is the major detrimental eect
of CSP. Surface roughness, owing to the local intensication of the far-eld stress, can account for the premature
initiation and propagation of short fatigue cracks [33].
Rodopoulos et al. [34] suggested that a portion of residual
stresses is consumed in order to counteract the detrimental
eects of surface roughening. In brief, the elastic stress concentration provided by the surface roughness will increase
the surface stress and hence the near-surface crack growth
rate.
In this work, the use of the CSP technology to provide
an improvement of the fatigue resistance of FSW has
been selected on the grounds that: (a) the technology
180
170
160
Hardness (HV)
taken from nugget zone of 6063 Al alloy showed a minimum value among other regions. These dierences in hardness value within the nugget have been correlated with the
size of the precipitates present in the region [10,1214].
Investigations in the 2xxx and 7xxx aluminium series
showed hardness minima within the TMAZ zone
[6,8,15,16]. The eect has been attributed to overaging [10].
Residual stress elds are widely believed to signicantly
eect catastrophic crack nucleation and growth. In [8,17
19], residual stress distribution was reported to vary along
the zones of the weld. Webster et al. [20] measured the
residual stresses using Synchrotron X-ray technique and
reported tensile residual stress in the nugget zone of
7108-T79. Similar nding were also reported by Bussu
and Irving [10], Oosterkam et al. [21] for 2024-T351 and
AA7108-T79, respectively. Nevertheless, Jata et al. [11]
and Dalle Donne et al. [22] found a small compressive
residual stress located at the centre of the nugget zone for
7050-T7451, AlLiCu and 6013-T6.
Defects associated with the FSW process are strongly
associated with fatigue resistance. In [13,15,23] it was
reported that voids, inclusions and surface cracks dominate the nugget and represent potential sites for crack initiation. The above makes clear that quality process control
and quality fatigue damage tolerance control over FSW
joints is a complex requirement demanding extensive and
well organised international research. Yet, driven from
todays market and societal needs for prompt innovation,
cost and pollutant emission reduction [24], the fatigue
behaviour of FSW joints needs to be improved and safeguarded without the need for an in-depth research. Such
solution can be sought in terms of controlled shot peening
(CSP).
CSP is a well established surface engineering treatment
in the area of aeronautical and automotive engineering
[25]. Pellets made of steel, ceramic or even dry ice, accelerated by either pneumatic or mechanical means are directed
through controllable ow conditions onto the surface of
the target material. The above results into the development
of compressive residual stresses, strain hardening of the
1533
150
140
130
120
Hardness on the top weld surface
110
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
Fig. 2. 2-D mapping of the weld. The plate joint line (PJL) corresponds to the centre weld section and is being used as scaling origin. The map also reveals
the non-symmetrical distribution of the zones left or right to the PJL with the right TMAZ showing smaller area compared to its left counterpart. Such
discrepancy is attributed to contact pressure dierence in the disc shoulder (possibly during rotation).
1534
has been previously applied to aluminium tungsten-inertgas (TIG) and metal-inert-gas (MAG) welds with exceptional results [35]; (b) FSW does not create softening
eects typical to TIG which would prevent the complete
development of residual stresses [35]; (c) CSP has the
potential of altering the state and magnitude of residual
stresses (from tension to compression) [36]; and (d) the
strain rate from CSP is low enough not to aect microstructural properties like the explosive hardening treatment [36] which would have complicated the case. This
work presents a detailed analysis towards the potential
of CSP to improve the fatigue resistance of 2024-T3 aluminium alloy friction stir welds.
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Weld micromechanical properties and zone mapping
The investigation was performed on 13 mm thick 2024T351 FSW joint. The joints were provided by Airbus UK,
Broughton. Plates 13 mm thick have been welded along
their long edge with the weld direction parallel to the
150
145
Experimental PJL
Regression
140
Microhardness, HV 0.1
Microhardenss, HV 0.1
140
130
120
110
100
135
130
125
120
90
115
0
10
12
14
2000
140
8000
10000
12000
14000
150
Experimental 9mm from PJL
Regression
135
145
Microhardness, HV0.1
Microhardness HV0.1
6000
130
125
120
115
140
135
130
125
110
105
120
0
10
12
14
10
12
14
12
14
150
150
Microhardness, HV0.1
140
Microhardness, HV0.1
4000
130
120
110
145
140
135
130
125
100
10
12
14
10
Fig. 4. Microhardness measurements along the six selected sections. To better acknowledge the tendencies, regression analysis was performed.
1535
Fig. 5. Back scattered images taken from GDOES prepared spots at dierent locations as well as from the left ( ) or right (+) side of the weld.
1536
longitudinal (rolling) orientation. The welds have been produced using a spindle speed of 200 rpm and a feed rate of
120 mm/min. The chemical composition and basic static
mechanical properties of the parent material are shown in
Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
For identication and measurement of the ve zones
microstructure, the weld was cross-sectioned using a Beuhler Isomet 4000 precision diamond saw with rotational disk
speed of 4100 rpm and a feed rate of 1.6 mm/min. The sections, undergone mechanical polishing using a series of
emery papers and diamond pastes until reaching a 1/
4 lm nish. To reveal the microstructure the sections were
etched using Kellers reagent in accordance with ASTM
E340-00. Fig. 1 shows the grain size distribution of the different zones.
The nugget exhibits the nest grain with sizes in the
range between 5 and 10 lm. The ow arm zone was found
having a ne equiaxed grain structure of approximately 15.
The TMAZ exhibits a non-uniform and severely elongated
microstructure. The elongated grain size is found to range
between 200 and 400 lm representing dierent degrees of
thermomechanical plastic deformation which governed
the amount of material drawn into the weld zone. The
grain structure in HAZ and in the parent plate appears
have similar size in the order of 150200 lm. The process
also allowed the detailed 2-D mapping of all the dierent
zones as shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3 shows hardness proles measured along the top
and bottom surface. Generally the hardness of the bottom
surface is lower than that at the top. This is particularly the
case for the nugget zone (ow arm for the top surface). The
lowest hardness value from the top surface, approximately
118 Hv1, was found in the TMAZ and especially closer to
the interface with the HAZ (13 mm from the plate joint line
(PJL)). In contrast, the bottom surface exhibited its lowest
microhardness value within the nugget and TMAZ zone
(approximately 105118 Hv1). The highest top surface
microhardness value of 167 Hv1 was found within the
HAZ (approximately 16 mm from the PJL). Similar results
can also be conrmed for the bottom surface.
In order to investigate the eect of the gradient of the
thermomechanical plastic deformation taking place during
the welding process, which, as previously shown is manifested by dierences between the top and bottom weld surface, through thickness microhardness measurements were
taken from six selected sections (see Fig. 2). The measurements are depicted in Fig. 4.
The analysis reveals that: (a) section 1 (nugget) exhibits
degradation of its microhardness value with depth at a rate
of 1.4 HV/mm; (b) section 2 exhibits similar behaviour to
section 1 at a rate of 0.78 HV/mm; (c) section 3 (TMAZ +
HAZ) demonstrates minimum microhardness growth at a
rate of 0.42 HV/mm. Herein it is important to note that the
transition from TMAZ to HAZ at a depth of approximately
3.2 mm did not register any signicant change; (d) section 4
(HAZ close to TMAZ) shows signicant increase in the
microhardness with a growth rate of 0.85 HV/mm; (e)
Fig. 6. (a) 3-D distribution of residual stresses from the top (b) and
bottom (c) surface of the weld.
1537
Table 3
The result of cyclic tests in pure bending
Section
Youngs Strain
Hardening Cyclic
modulus hardening constant
yield
(GPa)
exponent (MPa)
stress
(MPa)
Parent material
Nugget
HAZ
TMAZ
(35% TMAZ + 65%
HAZ)
68
68
68
68
0.086
0.12
0.05546
0.413
770
720
719
800
340
270
410
250
1538
250
200
150
Fractographic analysis of the broken specimens was performed using a Philips XL-40 scanning electron microscope. Fig. 9a and b shows the crack nucleation sites
from the as-weld and polished condition tested at
300 MPa. The crack nuclei for the as-welded case are
500
Parent
As-Welded
Polished
450
400
350
300
100
10 4
10 5
10 6
10 7
10 8
Fig. 9. Fractographs from the broken surface of (a) as-welded and (b) polished tested at a maximum stress of 300 MPa.
Fig. 10. Fractographs taken at stress levels near to life run-outs (high cycle fatigue).
1539
1540
150
100
-50
-100
-150
-200
-300
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
TMAZ As-welded
TMAZ Peened as-welded
TMAZ Peened after 3mm skimming
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
50
-250
-300
0.0
1.6
0.2
0.4
Depth (mm)
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
50
0
0.8
Depth (mm)
50
-50
-100
-150
-200
0.0
0.6
HAZ as Welded
HAZ peened after skimming
HAZ peened as Welded
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
-50
-100
-150
-200
1.8
-250
0.0
Parent as welded
Parent peened as welded
Parent peened after 3mm skimming
0.2
0.4
Depth (mm)
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Depth (mm)
Fig. 11. Residual stress proles of each zone for the states of as-welded, peened as-welded and peened after 3 mm skimming.
190
190
PJL As-welded
PJL Peened as-welded
PJL Peened after 3mm Skimming
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
0.0
TMAZ as-welded
TMAZ Peened as-welded
TMAZ Peened after 3mm Skimming
180
Microhardness, HV0.1
Microhardness, HV0.1
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
110
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.8
1.0
Parent As-welded
Parent Peened as-welded
Parent Peened after 3mm skimming
170
Microhardness, HV0.1
Microhardness, HV0.1
0.6
180
HAZ As-welded
HAZ Peened as-welded
HAZ Peened after 3mm skimming
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
0.0
0.4
160
150
140
130
120
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
110
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Fig. 12. Microhardness proles of each zone for the states of as-welded, peened as-welded and peened after 3 mm skimming.
500
400
300
250
150
100
10 4
10 5
10 6
10 7
10 8
Fig. 13. SN curves from the testing matrix. The arrows indicate run-outs.
0
TMAZ Prior to loading
TMAZ After failure
350
200
-100
-120
Parent
Peened as-welded
Peened after 3mm skimming
As-welded
Mirror Polished
450
1541
-140
-160
-180
-200
-220
-50
-100
-150
-200
-240
-260
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
-250
0.0
1.6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
-120
-140
-160
-180
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Fig. 14. Residual stress proles prior and after failure at a maximum stress level of 310 MPa. Measurements were taken from the peened after 3 mm
skimming state.
1542
Fig. 15. Fractographs taken from (a) peened as-welded and (b) peened
after 3 mm skimming tested at 412 MPa (low cycle fatigue).
1543
Fig. 16. Fractographs taken from (a) peened as-welded and (b) peened after 3 mm skimming tested at 320 MPa (high cycle fatigue).
1544
presence of such stress concentration could be held responsible for shifting the positions of the crack nuclei, by inducing or not crack growth from the TMAZ/HAZ interface.
Once such feature is removed, the crack initiation is positioned within the nugget and TMAZ. Herein, it is important to note that the debonding of the ow arm from the
main nugget body is of crucial importance considering
the resulting changes in the stress gradient. Yet, both cases
exhibited multi-cracking in LCF. Such tendency, changes
to single crack nucleation and growth under HCF conditions. In addition, of out most importance is the value relation between the TMAZ cyclic yield stress and that of the
endurance limit found in the as-polished case. Considering
that no other area is characterised by such low cyclic
elasto-plastic transition value, it is rational to assume a
physical relation in terms of assuming LCF conditions
for the TMAZ even when the external stress denotes
HCF conditions for all other areas. Agglomeration of precipitates, variations in the grain size distribution and the
presence of K, Si oxides (inclusions) can be held responsible for such behaviour. Of course dierences in the cyclic
yield stress value were also measured in every other zone,
resulting in a highly irregular accumulation of straining
during cyclic loading. The above results into strain irregularity across the interfaces between the zones and could be
held responsible for crack nucleation, mainly, at these locations. Crack initiation from the debonding of the ow arm
from the nugget raises concerns over whether such feature
should be retained.
In general, CSP delivers a signicant improvement in
terms of fatigue life both in the region of low and high cycle
fatigue. The improvement against the as-welded state is evident for both the peened as-welded and peened after 3 mm
skimming state, with the rst showing further improvement. In all cases, CSP concetrated the crack initiation sites
into the nugget zone. Multiple cracking in this zone could
be attributed to surface stress concentration (roughness)
being particular detrimental since the material is exhibiting
ne grained structure. Considering that removal of the
onion ring scar, either by polishing, skimming or peening
(relieved some stress concentration), resulted into the
change of the crack initiation sites into the nugget zone it
is dicult to conclude on the direct impact that CSP has
on fatigue crack initiation. Being speculative, it would
not be irrational to consider that the most fragile zone in
terms of fatigue resistance is the TMAZ. The zone exhibits
irregular grain size distribution, contains tensile residual
stresses and its cyclic yield stress is particularly low. Yet,
only in the as-welded case tested in high cycle fatigue conditions, crack initiation was found to emanate within. On
the other hand, the nugget zone characterised by low cyclic
yield stress, ne grained microstructure, agglomeration and
rening of Cu precipitates and an overall compressive
residual stress nature, exhibited high density of crack initiation. Based on the above it is rational to conclude that
CSP does not alter the crack initiation tendency of the
FSW and hence the enhanced fatigue life is the result of
1545
[29] Romero JS. Ph.D. Thesis. The study of residual stresses due to shot
peening on aluminium alloys 2024 and 7150, The University of
Sheeld; 2002.
[30] Zhuang WZ, Halford GR. Investigation of residual stress relaxation
under cyclic load. Int J Fatigue 2001;23:S317.
[31] Curtis S, Rodopoulos CA, de los Rios ER, Levers A.
Analysis of the eects of controlled shot peening on fatigue
damage of high strength aluminium alloys. Int J Fatigue
2003;25:5966.
[32] Ordieres JM. Investigating the stability of residual stresses induced
by controlled shot peening on 7150-T651 aluminium alloy
subjected to cyclic loading, M.Sc. Thesis, The University of
Sheeld; 2003.
[33] Rodopoulos CA, Edwards R, Curtis SA, Romero JS, Choi J, de los
Rios ER, et al. In: Wagner L, editor. Theoretical analysis of
benecial and detrimental eects of controlled shot peening in high
strength aluminium alloys, 8th ICSP. New York: WileyVCH; 2003.
p. 54753.
[34] Rodopoulos CA, Curtis SA, de los Rios ER, Romero JS. Optimisation of the fatigue resistance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloys by
controlled shot peening methodology, results and analysis. Int J
Fatigue 2004;26:84956.
[35] Nitschecke-Pagel T, Wohlfahrt H. In: Wagner L, editor. Fatigue
strength improvement of welded aluminium alloys by dierent postweld treatment methods, 8th ICSP. New York: WileyVCH; 2003. p.
3606.
[36] Altenberger I. In: Wagner L, editor. Alternative mechanical surface
treatments: microstructures, residual stresses and fatigue behaviour,
8th ICSP. New York: WileyVCH; 2003. p. 42134.
[37] Ali A. Improving the fatigue life of aircraft components by using
surface engineering, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Sheeld;
2005.
[38] James MR. The relaxation of residual stresses during fatigue. In:
Kula E, Volker Weiss, editors. Proceedings of the 28th Sagamore
army materials research conference. New York: Plenum Press; 1981.
p. 297314.