Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clinically Detectable
Alfred Sommer, MD, MHSc; Joanne Katz, MS; Harry A. Quigley, MD; Neil R.
Alan L. Robin, MD; Ronald C. Richter, MD; Kathe A. Witt, COMT
ber
angle glaucoma
remain
Intraocular pressure
(IOP) is an important risk factor for
glaucoma but not definitive evidence of
the disease.13 At present, diagnosis
generally requires evidence of typical
glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy in
the absence of other potential causes.
Methods for reliably establishing
glaucomatous nerve atrophy are lim
ited. These include functional distur
bance, traditionally identified by typi
cal field abnormalities (eg, localized or
asymmetric depressions in retinal sen
sitivity corresponding to the arcuate
mary open
problematic.
1990.
From the Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology of the Wilmer Eye Institute, and the
School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.
Reprint requests to Wilmer 120, The Johns
Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD
21205 (Dr Sommer).
Miller, MD;
loss.8"10
Recruitment
presentations.
Beginning in 1986, routine follow-up ex
aminations were performed on the Hum
phrey Field Analyzer (Allergan-Humphrey
Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) using the
C-30-2 program. All data were transferred
a central file and analyzed by our cross-
to
Fig 1.Results in a 48-year-old white woman with normal visual field examination by Goldmann perimetry and Humphrey
C-30-2 in both eyes until 1988, when a small paracentral scotoma connecting to the blind spot developed in the right eye.
Top left, Nerve fiber layer (NFL) photograph from 1984 of the right eye. The appearance is entirely normal, with bright
striations, which cross the first- and second-order vessels, blurring the wall edges. The maculopapular bundle is dark
relative to the arcuate zones above and below. Bottom left, Corresponding Goldmann field from the same visit. Top center,
Photograph of the same eye from 1985 reveals a subtly dark, wedge-shaped area within the inferior arcuate zone, with
brighter NFL striations on either side (arrows). Bottom center, Corresponding Humphrey threshold field from the same visit.
Top right, Same eye photographed in 1987. The inferior defect has become darker and wider. The maculopapular bundle is
now brighter and more obviously striated in comparison. Vessels within the area of NFL atrophy stand out in sharp relief
(arrows). A swath of the superior arcuate zone has also become atrophie. Bottom right, Corresponding Humphrey threshold
field from the same visit.
were
re
study
was
at their
met the
RESULTS
to
up.
Fig
an
was
photo
photographs
were
considered
too poor to
ered
photographic technique.2"
As in our previous study,11 uninter
pretable photographs were more likely
to have been from older
subjects (Ta
of reader A
Fig
4.A
read as
eyes, all of which reader
abnormal. Those eyes that they agreed
were abnormal had the most severe
field defects; those that they agreed
were normal had the mildest field de
fects; and those about which they dis
agreed had defects between these two
extremes (Table 5). Eyes that they
both considered normal had smaller
cups and wider rims than those consid
ered abnormal by one or both observ
ers. Neither race nor iris color, factors
commonly associated with fundus pig
mentation and therefore the potential
visibility of the NFL, consistently in
fluenced the likelihood that an eye was
considered abnormal (data not given).
Nerve fiber layer abnormalities
were seemingly more extensive than
the corresponding field loss. At con
version, visual field loss (by kinetic and
suprathreshold static perimetry) in
volved both hemifields in only 14.8%
(reader A) and 13.2% (reader B) of all
eyes in which NFL defects were re
corded. In contrast, NFL abnormali
ties were noted in both hemispheres of
81.5% (reader A) and 84.9% (reader B)
of these same eyes (Table 6). The
proportion of eyes in which NFL ab
normalities involved both hemispheres
was greater for the three visits ending
with conversion than for the four pre
ceding visits.
In eyes with apparently localized
NFL defects, there was a close corre
spondence between the location of the
visual field and the NFL abnormali
ties. At conversion, field loss and NFL
defects were both limited to one hemi
sphere in seven eyes read by reader B,
and in every instance the hemispheres
were in perfect correspondence. Over-
38-year-old white
Table 1.
Number of Ocular
Unreadable
No. of
No. of Years
Before Onset of
Field Defect
Follow-up
Examinations
1
2
No. of Eyes
_
1176*
935
699
5301
5
6
672
449
One hundred forty eyes missed their first followwere seen at least once at a later follow-up.
tRepresents temporary interruption of study from
hiatus in funding.
up but
NFL indicates
nerve
Reader B,
No. (%)
Reader
A,
(%)
3/14(21.4)
2/16 (12.5)
0/21 (0.0)
0/18 (0.0)
3/21 (14.3)
6/58(10.3)
6/65(9.2)
fiber layer. Year 0
No.
3/13(23.1)
1/21 (4.8)
1/20(5.0)
0/19(0.0)
2/21 (9.5)
3/57 (5.3)
5/63(7.9)
was
year in which
Abnormal
Reader A,
No. (%)
Reader
B,
No. (%)
6/10(60.0)
15/20(75.0)
9/19(47.3)
16/19 (84.2)
15/19(78.9)
33/54(61.1)
51/58 (87.9)
visual field defect first appeared.
5/11
(45.5)
(14.3)
7/21 (33.3)
10/18 (55.6)
8/18(44.4)
19/52 (36.5)
27/59 (45.8)
2/14
Age, y
No.
61 13
64 15
73 10
32
Reader A
Normal
Abnormal
Cannot evaluate
Reader
Normal
Abnormal
Cannot evaluate
NFL indicates
nerve
65 10
62 14
76 6
fiber
NFL Status*
Reader A/Reader
No. of Years
Before Onset of
Field Defect
Mean (SD)
Assessment
on
abn/abn
Agreement
Total
abn/nl
100.0
27
6
64.7
7
51
5
77.6
49
20
60.0
layer.
*
34 examinations by reader B,
field loss and NFL defects were limit
ed to a single hemisphere; in 33 (97%)
these were in perfect correspondence.
Results for reader A, who found fewer
NFL abnormalities, were less well cor
related: overall, there was 69% corre
all, in
to
Excludes photographs examined by only one reader to date or that one or both readers considered too poor
nerve fiber layer; abn, abnormal; and nl, normal.
Optic
Nerve
Damage*
Reader A/Reader
nl/abn
abn/abn
At Field
Conversion
(n
More severe
field loss,
No. (%)
19
(73.1)
(15.4)
nl/nl
(n
(n 22)
26)
14
(63.6)
7)
(57.1)
Field defect
in more than
1 hemisphere,
172
56
spondence (11/16).
48
68
Total examinations
No.
(%)
2(9.1)
(0.0)
Horizontal
cup/disc,
mean
2 SE
Reader A
Reader
0.62 0.12
0.60 0.08
0.63 0.06
0.67 0.06
0.40 0.18
0.37 0.23
Reader A
Reader
0.15 0.06
0.16 0.05
0.13 0.05
0.14 0.05
0.27 0.13
0.32 0.12
Narrowest
rim
width,
mean
2 SE
Severe indicates
arcuate scotoma
or
more
worse;
than
or
isolated nasal
step),
eg, full
COMMENT
Table
6.Correspondence
Hemispheres
No. of
Years
Before
Onset of
Field Defect
Hemifields
Reader
Reader A
With
Goldmann ,Defects
Sup Inf
Sup
3-6
Both
Total
10
(includes
conversion)
At conversion
Sup
Both
Total
Sup
Both
Total
6
17 (77.2%) 22
32
26
12
io
45
(83.3%)
12
Sup
(27.3%)
10(18.5%)
*ln
nerve
Total
4(14.8%)
by definition,
Sup, superior; and Inf, inferior.
fiber layer;
far more subjects, who were reexamined annually following a strictly moni
tored protocol.
Nerve fiber layer abnormalities
were infrequent among normal con
trols and somewhat more frequent
16
11
6 31 (67..
10 45
46
56
30
15
14
(23.9%)
(14.9%)
84(83.2%) 101
4 26
15
22 (81.5%) 27
Total
Both
11
54
8
Both
Inf
Inf
2-0
.-
13
5 45
(84.!
30
16
7
53
(13.2%)
yet
Reading*
Reader
12
82(87%)
3/27
Total
47
94
layer. Results
are
57/214(26.6) 84/327(25.7)
27/59 (45.8) 51/58 (87.9)
*
NFL indicates nerve fiber layer. Field loss is prev
alence of NFL defects at the time of field loss repeated
from Table 3 for ease of comparison. Difference in
rates for ocular hypertensive vs control eyes, < .05
(reader A), P< .001 (reader B).
Field loss
of
.001).
tographic technique
the criteria by
which the two readers judged the pres
ence of NFL abnormalities.
The prevalence of defects among
eyes with OH is presumably greater
than among normal controls because
some eyes with OH have already suf
fered glaucomatous optic nerve dam
age sufficient to alter NFL appearance
but insufficient to produce field loss
meeting our rigid criteria. Indeed, this
is exactly the explanation postulated in
our baseline report," before the eyes
that were then in the group with H
(many of which already had NFL de
fects) subsequently suffered the field
loss that is the basis of the present
analysis.
or
optic
(11.1)
eyes
(3.7)
hypertensive
16
fiber
1/27
Ocular
31(66%)
nerve
controls
Reader
Normal
Abnormal
indicates
No.
Normal
Interpretation of
Subsequent
NFL Photographs
*NFL
B,
(%)
Reader
present
not yet
to show
to normal
retina.23
Diffuse
bundle
appreciated
References
1. Sommer A. Intraocular pressure and glaucoAm J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:186-188.
2. Anderson DR. Glaucoma: the damage caused
by pressure: XLVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:485-495.
3. Van Buskirk EM. Glaucoma lexicon. Am J
ma.
Ophthalmol. 1989;108:730-731.
1984;98:566-571.
Ophthalmol. 1985;103:205-207.
layer
assessment. Arch
1766-1771.
Ophthalmol. 1984;102:
1987;105:1355-1357.
1988;106:1252-1254.
19. Miller NR, George TW. Monochromatic
(red-free) photography and ophthalmoscopy of the
Ophthalmology. 1989;96:639-641.
23.
layer
1990;108:557-560.
28. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Measurement of relative nerve fiber layer surface height in glaucoma.
Ophthalmology. 1989;96:633-639.
29. Enger C, Sommer A. Automated threshold
perimetry before glaucomatous field loss in eyes