Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In India, quality of Higher Education has been a matter of concern over the past many years. There has been a
growing feeling that institutions of higher learning in India are degenerating into degree-producing machines instead of
acting as fountain heads of knowledge. The past two decades have witnessed revolutionary developments in the field of
Information Technology (IT). The impact of this revolution has been felt in almost every field. This paper reviews the
impact of Information Technology on education in India. It also explores the role that IT can play towards improving the
quality of Higher Education in India.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
10
Mukti Gill
standard of excellence in teaching, examination, research and extension. Quality in the context of higher education is all
about the content, its relevance and delivery. It is about the moral obligation that the students deserve the best of higher
education. Quality is also about the professional imperative that the teachers have to give their best and is also a social
implication that the system must exhibit accountability.
PERCEPTION OF QUALITY IN INDIA
In India, the traditional perception of quality higher education focuses on the accumulation of information.
It considers a person having higher education as the one who is well read and experienced in certain ideas and thoughts;
has the capability to quote facts already explored and explained by others. So far, most of our educational institutes have
remained regimens oflearning answers. Quantity, rather than quality has been the parameter for measuring higher
education. This has resulted in mediocrity. Currently, students passing out from institutions of higher education do so
without obtaining the kind of skills they really need to work in a real-world environment. The students are increasingly
deficient in analytical skills, reasoning, problem solving and communicational skills. They lack in curiosity, inquisitiveness
and creativity.
In a survey carried out by Wheebox, Peoples Strong in collaboration with Confederation of Indian Industry in
2013, it has been reported that out of the over five million graduates in 2014, only 34% of them would be employable as
most of them lack the necessary skills required for any role in the industry. The industry is facing shortage of skilled
workers despite the vast human resources that the country possesses. Dr Kalam, former President of India, has rightly said
that India faces a problem ofunemployability and not of unemployment. All this reflects the status and the quality of our
higher education system. It also stresses the need for quality assurance and identification of academic and other
benchmarks.
QUALITY DRIVE IN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION
Higher education acts as a catalyst to promote socio-economic empowerment of a nation (Cholin, 2005; Mehta
and Kalra, 2006). It is an agent of social transformation and is universally recognized as an investment in building human
capital which is the driver of technological innovation and economic growth. Thus upholding the quality standards of
higher education is of prime importance for the all round growth and development of the nation. Recognizing this need, the
University Grants Commission (UGC) was formed in 1956 and was assigned the responsibility of maintenance of quality
standards in the higher education sector. Since then, the UGC has taken various steps towards the fulfillment of this
responsibility. With vast expansion of higher education since then and the growing concern regarding the degradation in
the quality of education being imparted in the countrys colleges and universities, the UGC established National
Assessment and Accreditation Council of India (NAAC), an autonomous body in 1994.
NAAC was established with a vision to make quality as the defining element of higher education in India through
a combination of self and external quality evaluation, promotion and sustenance initiatives (NAAC, 2012).
For this its mission is To arrange for periodic assessment and accreditation of institutions of higher education or units
thereof or specific programs or projects, to simulate the academic environment for promotion of quality of
teaching-learning and research in higher education institutions; to encourage self assessment, accountability, autonomy and
innovations in higher education; to undertake quality related research studies, counseling and training programs and to
collaborate with other quality stakeholders for quality evaluation, promotion and sustenance.(NAAC, 2013)
11
For quality promotion in professional courses, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) which is a
statuary body for technical institutions established the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) in 1994 to accredit programs
offered by the technical institutions.
Likewise, there are other statuary bodies like Medical Council of India, Distance Education Council, Indian
Nursing Council etc. which have been established for quality auditing of various professional institutions.
Despite the existence of these quality regulation bodies, there has not been considerable improvement in the
quality standards of our institutions of higher learning. According to a NAAC report, published in 2013, 90% of colleges
and 62% of universities accredited are average or below average. The real numbers are likely to be even worse as so far
only 179 universities and 5,224 colleges have valid accreditation. Only 11% of the accredited institutions are 'A' grade,
while 71% are in 'B' grade and the remaining 18% of the accredited colleges and universities are in the lowest grade that is
'C'. (Gohain, 2014).
Considering the fact that just one-sixth of the colleges and less than 30% of the universities have got themselves
accredited, the MHRD in a step towards ensuring that all the educational institutes get accredited have made accreditation
mandatory for an institute to be eligible to receive funds under a new Central government sponsored Rashtriya Uchchatar
Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) scheme. This scheme, launched in 2013 aims to improve access, equity and quality in higher
education through planned development of higher education at the state level (Deloitte, 2013).
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION
The last two decades have witnessed revolutionary developments in the field of Information and Communication
Technologies (ICT). New innovations in these technologies have made their impact on all nations across the globe and
have affected our lifestyles considerably. ICTs have become an integral part of our lives in this digitally connected and
rapidly changing 21st century (Kim, 2014). These new technologies have affected all the facets of our activities and have
contributed to the overall development of our society. As far as higher education is considered, adoption and penetration of
these new technologies has been rather slow. As a result the impact of these technologies in education is not as
considerable as it can be seen in the other fields. The potential of these technologies to transform the education system has
still to be harnessed and explored. The following section of the paper explores the important role that the recent advances
in information technology can play in the upliftment of the educational standards of higher education.
ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR QUALITY ENHANCEMENT
ICT is an umbrella term that includes computer hardware and software; broadcasting and telecommunications
technologies as also electronic information repositories such as the World Wide Web or those found on CD-ROMs
(Selwyn, 2002). ICT is a strategic tool that allows users to become more efficient and effective (Ssewanyana, 2009).
In this era of globalization, the role of ICT in education is becoming more and more important and this importance
will continue to grow and develop in the 21st century (Buabeng-Andoh, 2012; Oliver, 2002).
The benefits of using information technology in our day to day life are well recognized. In the field of education,
it can be effectively used by various stakeholders viz. students / learners, teachers, administrators, researchers and policy
makers. Information Technology is a medium to improve the overall quality of education (Toro and Joshi, 2012).
Technology resources can provide opportunities for learning and can create the "conditions that optimize learning"
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
12
Mukti Gill
13
CONCLUSIONS
Quality enhancement in higher education is assuming immense significance. This is mainly because the system is
becoming more complex and competitive under the continuing technological, information and communication
advancements which are changing the employment generation scenario and the socio-economic needs. This demands an
integration of different kinds of technologies in the future knowledge delivery and acquisition systems.
The study highlights the various ways in which information technology can be integrated into our teaching learning process
to make our higher education system more effective, productive and qualitatively enhanced.
REFERENCES
1.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors Influencing Teachers Adoption and Integration of Information and
Communication Technology into Teaching: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Education and
Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 136-155.
2.
Carnoy, M. (2006). Higher education and economic development: India, China and the 21st century. In Pan Asia
Conference: Focus on Economic Challenges, Stanford Center for International Development, Stanford University,
Palo Alto, CA.
3.
Cholin, V. S. (2005). Study of the application of information technology for effective access to resources in Indian
university libraries. The International Information & Library Review 37(3), pp. 189-197.
4.
Deloitte. (2013, November). ASHE 2013: Annual Status of Higher education of States and UTs in India.
Deloitte Education Sector Team.
5.
Gohain, M.P. (2014, February 21). Indian universities-Second grade? The Times of India. Retrievedfrom
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/Indian-universities-secondgrade/articleshow/30747157.cms.
6.
Kozma, R. (2005). National Policies That Connect ICT -Based Education Reform To Economic And Social
Development, Human Technology Vol. 1, No. (2), pp. 117-156.
7.
Kulik, J. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools:
What controlled evaluation studies say (Final Report No. P10446.001). Arlington, VA: SRI International
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
14
Mukti Gill
8.
Mehta, S. and Kalra, M. (2006). Information and Communication Technologies: A bridge for social equity and
sustainable development in India. The International Information & Library Review 38(3), 147-160.
9.
Makkar, U, Gabriel, E. Ole, & Tripathi, S. K. (2008). Value chain for higher education sector case studies of India
and
Tanzania.
Journal
of
Services
Research,
8.
Retrieved
from
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/32022426/value-chain-higher-education-sectorcase-studies-indiatanzania.
10. NAAC, (2012). Manual for Self appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions, National Assessment and
Accreditation
Council
of
India.
Retrieved
from
http://naac.gov.in/docs/Manual%20for%
20Teacher
%20Education.pdf.
11. NAAC, (2013). Institutional Accreditation Manual for Self-Study Report Affiliated / Constituent Colleges.
National Assessment and Accreditation Council
12. Oliver, R. (2002). The Role of ICT in Higher Education for the 21st Century: ICT as a Change Agent for
Education. Proceedings of the Higher Education for the 21st Century Conference, Miri, Sarawak:
Curtin University.
13. Powar, K. B, & Panda, S. K. (2012). Higher education in India -In search of quality. Retrieved from
http://dspace.nehu.ac.in/handle/1/778
14. Raj, K. N. (1971). Crisis of higher education in India. New Delhi.
15. Selwyn, N. (2002). Defining the digital divide: developing a theoretical understanding of inequalities in the
information age. Cardiff School of Social Sciences Occasional Paper, 49. School of Social Sciences,
Cardiff University, Cardiff. Retrieved from: www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/ict/definingdigitaldivide.pdf
16. Ssewanyana, J. K. (2009). ICT Usage in Microfinance Institutions in Uganda. The African Journal of Information
Systems (AJIS), 1(3), pp.5-28.
17. Switzer, T. J, Callahan, W. P, & Quinn, L. (1999, March). Technology as facilitator of quality education:
An unfinished model. Paper presented at Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio.
18. Toro, U. & Joshi, M. (2012). ICT in Higher Education: Review of Literature from the Period 2004-2011.
International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1
19. Webb, M, & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology.
Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 13 No. (3), pp. 235286