Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Receivables is one of the three primary components of working capital, the other two being
inventory and cash. Receivables occupy second important place after inventories and thereby
constitute a substantial portion of current assets in several firms. The capital invested in
receivables is almost of the same as that of the investment made in cash and inventories.
Accounts receivable typically comprise more than 25 percent of a firms assets. So the
management of accounts receivable means the management of one-quarter of the firms
assets. The cash flows from a sale cannot be invested until the account is collected, the
control of receivables takes on added importance in that it affects both the profitability and
liquidity of the firm. Effective management of receivables facilitates to increase the size of
the business activities by increasing total sales consequently increasing recycling of funds
and generating higher profitability.
Problem Statement
Most of the times it is noticed that firms does not hold the right amount of stocks, debtors and
cash. Due to this reason the firm is unable to meet its maturing short term obligations and its
upcoming operational needs. Lack of adequate working capital also means that a firm is
unable to undertake expansion projects and increase its sales, therefore limiting the growth
and profitability of the business. Proper management of inventory and receivables leads to the
increase profitability.
Research Question
1. Does Inventory control have an impact on firms profitability?
2. What impact Inventory management has on profitability of the paper and board sector
of Pakistan?
3. What impact receivable management has on profitability of the paper and board sector
of Pakistan?
Literature review
Management of inventories and receivables was found to have a significant impact on
profitability in studies from different countries.
Sinha .KP, Sinha.AK and Singh. SC (1988) in their study on the analysis of working capital
management in Fertilizer Corporation of India with reference to Gujarat State Fertilizer
Corporation revealed that a huge portion of funds was tied up in the form of working capital,
especially in inventories and receivables. The study revealed ineffective management of
working capital as the prime cause for erosion in profits. It found that the management of
receivables particularly was highly unplanned and ineffective, which resulted in unpredicted
cash inflows and huge amount of bad debts. The study strongly recommended urgent action
to avoid further deterioration.
Suk. H, Kim.SH and Rowland have conducted a survey among 94 Japanese companies
in USA (1992) found that they differed in working capital management practices from the US
companies in terms of lower levels of inventory and higher levels of accounts receivables.
The study revealed that the US firms piled-up their inventories; Japanese firms had higher
percentage of receivables to total assets.
Padachi. K (2006) examined the trends in working capital management and its impact on
firms performance. The results proved that a high investment in inventories and receivables
is associated with lower profitability. Further, he showed that inventory days and cash
conversion cycle had positive relation with profitability. On the other hand, account
receivables days and account payables days correlated negatively with profitability.
Deloof, M (2003) found a significant negative relation between gross operating income and
the number of days accounts receivables, inventories and accounts payables of Belgian firms.
These results suggested that managers can create value for their shareholders by reducing the
number of days accounts receivables and inventories to a reasonable minimum. The negative
relationship between accounts payable and profitability inconsistent with the view that less
profitable firms wait longer to pay their bills.
Falope and Ajilore (2009) used a sample of 50 Nigerian quoted non financial firms for the
period 1996 2005. Their study utilized panel data econometrics in a pooled regression,
where time series and cross sectional observations were combined and estimated. They found
a significant negative relationship between net operating profit on one hand and the average
collection period (ACP) and average payment period (APP) on the other hand for a sample of
fifty Nigerian firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.
Dr. Srinivas Madishetti and Mr. Deogratias Kibona (2013) determine the impact of
average collection period and average payment period on SMEs profitability In Tanzania.
5
The study is carried out using dependent variable as gross operating profit and independent
variables as average collection period and average payment period employing relevant
information of 38 Tanzanian SMEs,s for the period from 2006 to 2011. This study employed
Regression analysis to determine the impact of average collection period and average
payment period on gross operating profit taking current ratio, size of the firm, financial debt
ratio as control variables. The results indicate that there is a significant negative relationship
between average collection period and profitability. Positive relationship is observed between
average payment period and gross operating profit. The relationship between two control
variables viz; current ratio, financial debt ratio and gross operating profit indicate the
expected negative relationship whereas the firm size indicate unexpected negative
relationship which may be due to gaps in managerial performance.
Theoretical framework
Independent variable
Dependent variable
Account receivable
turnover in Days
Average collection period
NET OPERATING
PROFIT
Research hypothesis
H1: The number of days accounts receivable are outstanding has no significant impact on the
profitability of Pakistani Paper and Board companies.
H2: There is positive and significant relationship between average collection period and
ROE.
H3: The number of days inventory are held has no significant impact on the profitability of
Pakistani Paper and Board companies.
H4: The Inventory conversion ratio has positive impact on the profitability of Pakistani Paper
and Board companies.
Research Methodology
Population of this study is total listed companies of Paper and Board industry in Karachi
stock exchange.
Data collection
Secondary data will be collected through through financial statements and URL of Karachi
stock exchange.
Data analysis
In order to analyze data SPSS software will be used. Descriptive statistics will be used to
calculate mean and standard deviation. Regression analysis is conducted to find out if there is
an association/ Relation between Inventory and Receivable Management on Profitability.
References
Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), Estimating non response bias in mail surveys,
Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), pp. 396-402.
Boon-Itt, S. and Wong, C.Y. (2011), The moderating effects of technological and demand
uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery
performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management,
41(3), pp. 253-276.
Boyer, K.K. (1998), Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations
strategies, International Journal of Operations and Production Management,18(4), pp. 356373.
Boyer, K.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2002), Competitive priorities: investigating the need for
trade offs in operations strategy, Production and Operations Management, 11(1), pp. 9-20.
10
Boyer, K.K., Leong, G., Ward, P. and Krajewski, L. (1997), Unlocking the potential of
advanced manufacturing technologies, Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), pp. 331347.
Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X. (2010), The impact of supply chain integration on
performance: a contingency and configuration approach, Journal of Operations
Management,
28(1), pp. 58-71.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with
unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research,18(1), pp.
29-50.
Germain,
R. and
Iyer, K.N.S.
integration and its association with performance, Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), p. 29.
11
E. (2003),
Van Hoek, R.I. and Mitchell, A.J. (2006), The challenge of internal misalignment,
International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply
Chain Management, 9(3), pp. 269-81.
12